Installing .deb (Brackets.Release.1.13.64-bit.deb) package in arch Linux The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InInstalling a .deb package on Arch - Is it possible?local package cache for arch linuxEnvironment for creating a packagedebootstrap terminates partway through with “stdin: not in compressed format”Determine if a package is provided by an installed packagein Arch LinuxConvert pacman package to deb or rpm?Which mirror did I download the Arch Linux package database from?How to update an Arch Linux PKGBUILD file for new version (printer driver)?“Arming ConditionNeedsUpdate” error when Building Arch Linux PackageHow to compile Neofetch (from git) in arch Linux?
Why isn't airport relocation done gradually?
A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky
"To split hairs" vs "To be pedantic"
I see my dog run
What tool would a Roman-age civilization have to grind silver and other metals into dust?
"Riffle" two strings
Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?
Access elements in std::string where positon of string is greater than its size
How to manage monthly salary
CiviEvent: Public link for events of a specific type
How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?
How can I fix this gap between bookcases I made?
What is the best strategy for white in this position?
Idiomatic way to prevent slicing?
What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?
How to deal with fear of taking dependencies
aging parents with no investments
Is three citations per paragraph excessive for undergraduate research paper?
Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?
What does "rabbited" mean/imply in this sentence?
Could JWST stay at L2 "forever"?
Pristine Bit Checking
What can other administrators access on my machine?
Understanding the implication of what "well-defined" means for the operation in quotient group
Installing .deb (Brackets.Release.1.13.64-bit.deb) package in arch Linux
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InInstalling a .deb package on Arch - Is it possible?local package cache for arch linuxEnvironment for creating a packagedebootstrap terminates partway through with “stdin: not in compressed format”Determine if a package is provided by an installed packagein Arch LinuxConvert pacman package to deb or rpm?Which mirror did I download the Arch Linux package database from?How to update an Arch Linux PKGBUILD file for new version (printer driver)?“Arming ConditionNeedsUpdate” error when Building Arch Linux PackageHow to compile Neofetch (from git) in arch Linux?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
The latest release of Brackets (v1.13) is not available in the AUR. So I downloaded the official .deb package from the official site. Now how do I go about installing it ? Do I have to write a PKGBUILD? I won't know it's dependency and all.
I have converted it to an arch package with Debtap.
But pacman -U <Convertedpackage.tar.xz>
throws unresolvable dependency for the following:
warning: cannot resolve "libudev>=147", a dependency of "brackets"
warning: cannot resolve "lsb-base>=3.2", a dependency of "brackets"
How should I go about this ?
arch-linux pacman deb pkgbuild makepkg
add a comment |
The latest release of Brackets (v1.13) is not available in the AUR. So I downloaded the official .deb package from the official site. Now how do I go about installing it ? Do I have to write a PKGBUILD? I won't know it's dependency and all.
I have converted it to an arch package with Debtap.
But pacman -U <Convertedpackage.tar.xz>
throws unresolvable dependency for the following:
warning: cannot resolve "libudev>=147", a dependency of "brackets"
warning: cannot resolve "lsb-base>=3.2", a dependency of "brackets"
How should I go about this ?
arch-linux pacman deb pkgbuild makepkg
Convert to atar.gz
file usingalien
. Then extract in a directory, check the binaries withldd
to make sure you have what they need, and then move files/directories around as needed. Personally I'd put 'em under/opt
and manually link binaries, etc to appropriate places under/usr
or/usr/local
– ivanivan
2 days ago
@ivanivan , is it working for you ?
– Just Khaithang
2 days ago
no, I use Debian and Mint, so ... But this is how I've used packages from other distros successfully in the past.
– ivanivan
2 days ago
@ivanivan, I considered that manual method but you see I already have v1.12 installed. So that means will it involve replacing the existing file of v1.12 . Isn't it?
– Just Khaithang
2 days ago
add a comment |
The latest release of Brackets (v1.13) is not available in the AUR. So I downloaded the official .deb package from the official site. Now how do I go about installing it ? Do I have to write a PKGBUILD? I won't know it's dependency and all.
I have converted it to an arch package with Debtap.
But pacman -U <Convertedpackage.tar.xz>
throws unresolvable dependency for the following:
warning: cannot resolve "libudev>=147", a dependency of "brackets"
warning: cannot resolve "lsb-base>=3.2", a dependency of "brackets"
How should I go about this ?
arch-linux pacman deb pkgbuild makepkg
The latest release of Brackets (v1.13) is not available in the AUR. So I downloaded the official .deb package from the official site. Now how do I go about installing it ? Do I have to write a PKGBUILD? I won't know it's dependency and all.
I have converted it to an arch package with Debtap.
But pacman -U <Convertedpackage.tar.xz>
throws unresolvable dependency for the following:
warning: cannot resolve "libudev>=147", a dependency of "brackets"
warning: cannot resolve "lsb-base>=3.2", a dependency of "brackets"
How should I go about this ?
arch-linux pacman deb pkgbuild makepkg
arch-linux pacman deb pkgbuild makepkg
edited 2 days ago
Prabhjot Singh
107213
107213
asked Apr 6 at 22:00
Just KhaithangJust Khaithang
207
207
Convert to atar.gz
file usingalien
. Then extract in a directory, check the binaries withldd
to make sure you have what they need, and then move files/directories around as needed. Personally I'd put 'em under/opt
and manually link binaries, etc to appropriate places under/usr
or/usr/local
– ivanivan
2 days ago
@ivanivan , is it working for you ?
– Just Khaithang
2 days ago
no, I use Debian and Mint, so ... But this is how I've used packages from other distros successfully in the past.
– ivanivan
2 days ago
@ivanivan, I considered that manual method but you see I already have v1.12 installed. So that means will it involve replacing the existing file of v1.12 . Isn't it?
– Just Khaithang
2 days ago
add a comment |
Convert to atar.gz
file usingalien
. Then extract in a directory, check the binaries withldd
to make sure you have what they need, and then move files/directories around as needed. Personally I'd put 'em under/opt
and manually link binaries, etc to appropriate places under/usr
or/usr/local
– ivanivan
2 days ago
@ivanivan , is it working for you ?
– Just Khaithang
2 days ago
no, I use Debian and Mint, so ... But this is how I've used packages from other distros successfully in the past.
– ivanivan
2 days ago
@ivanivan, I considered that manual method but you see I already have v1.12 installed. So that means will it involve replacing the existing file of v1.12 . Isn't it?
– Just Khaithang
2 days ago
Convert to a
tar.gz
file using alien
. Then extract in a directory, check the binaries with ldd
to make sure you have what they need, and then move files/directories around as needed. Personally I'd put 'em under /opt
and manually link binaries, etc to appropriate places under /usr
or /usr/local
– ivanivan
2 days ago
Convert to a
tar.gz
file using alien
. Then extract in a directory, check the binaries with ldd
to make sure you have what they need, and then move files/directories around as needed. Personally I'd put 'em under /opt
and manually link binaries, etc to appropriate places under /usr
or /usr/local
– ivanivan
2 days ago
@ivanivan , is it working for you ?
– Just Khaithang
2 days ago
@ivanivan , is it working for you ?
– Just Khaithang
2 days ago
no, I use Debian and Mint, so ... But this is how I've used packages from other distros successfully in the past.
– ivanivan
2 days ago
no, I use Debian and Mint, so ... But this is how I've used packages from other distros successfully in the past.
– ivanivan
2 days ago
@ivanivan, I considered that manual method but you see I already have v1.12 installed. So that means will it involve replacing the existing file of v1.12 . Isn't it?
– Just Khaithang
2 days ago
@ivanivan, I considered that manual method but you see I already have v1.12 installed. So that means will it involve replacing the existing file of v1.12 . Isn't it?
– Just Khaithang
2 days ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Okay it seems Brackets 1.13 have some issues in arch linux
There are two provider for Brackets 1.12 in AUR and both have been flagged old because v1.13 was released more than six months ago.
link- http://blog.brackets.io/2018/06/18/brackets-1-13-is-now-available/
I should have checked the pinned comment by the maintainer.
link - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brackets-bin/
Also this.
http://github.com/adobe/brackets/issues/14485
So, currently, Brackets 1.13 breaks down in arch Linux and they are waiting for the fix from the upstream providers.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f510955%2finstalling-deb-brackets-release-1-13-64-bit-deb-package-in-arch-linux%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Okay it seems Brackets 1.13 have some issues in arch linux
There are two provider for Brackets 1.12 in AUR and both have been flagged old because v1.13 was released more than six months ago.
link- http://blog.brackets.io/2018/06/18/brackets-1-13-is-now-available/
I should have checked the pinned comment by the maintainer.
link - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brackets-bin/
Also this.
http://github.com/adobe/brackets/issues/14485
So, currently, Brackets 1.13 breaks down in arch Linux and they are waiting for the fix from the upstream providers.
add a comment |
Okay it seems Brackets 1.13 have some issues in arch linux
There are two provider for Brackets 1.12 in AUR and both have been flagged old because v1.13 was released more than six months ago.
link- http://blog.brackets.io/2018/06/18/brackets-1-13-is-now-available/
I should have checked the pinned comment by the maintainer.
link - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brackets-bin/
Also this.
http://github.com/adobe/brackets/issues/14485
So, currently, Brackets 1.13 breaks down in arch Linux and they are waiting for the fix from the upstream providers.
add a comment |
Okay it seems Brackets 1.13 have some issues in arch linux
There are two provider for Brackets 1.12 in AUR and both have been flagged old because v1.13 was released more than six months ago.
link- http://blog.brackets.io/2018/06/18/brackets-1-13-is-now-available/
I should have checked the pinned comment by the maintainer.
link - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brackets-bin/
Also this.
http://github.com/adobe/brackets/issues/14485
So, currently, Brackets 1.13 breaks down in arch Linux and they are waiting for the fix from the upstream providers.
Okay it seems Brackets 1.13 have some issues in arch linux
There are two provider for Brackets 1.12 in AUR and both have been flagged old because v1.13 was released more than six months ago.
link- http://blog.brackets.io/2018/06/18/brackets-1-13-is-now-available/
I should have checked the pinned comment by the maintainer.
link - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brackets-bin/
Also this.
http://github.com/adobe/brackets/issues/14485
So, currently, Brackets 1.13 breaks down in arch Linux and they are waiting for the fix from the upstream providers.
edited yesterday
answered 2 days ago
Just KhaithangJust Khaithang
207
207
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f510955%2finstalling-deb-brackets-release-1-13-64-bit-deb-package-in-arch-linux%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
-arch-linux, deb, makepkg, pacman, pkgbuild
Convert to a
tar.gz
file usingalien
. Then extract in a directory, check the binaries withldd
to make sure you have what they need, and then move files/directories around as needed. Personally I'd put 'em under/opt
and manually link binaries, etc to appropriate places under/usr
or/usr/local
– ivanivan
2 days ago
@ivanivan , is it working for you ?
– Just Khaithang
2 days ago
no, I use Debian and Mint, so ... But this is how I've used packages from other distros successfully in the past.
– ivanivan
2 days ago
@ivanivan, I considered that manual method but you see I already have v1.12 installed. So that means will it involve replacing the existing file of v1.12 . Isn't it?
– Just Khaithang
2 days ago