Basic combinations logic doubt in probability The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InProbability of picking three marbles in ordergetting an outcome x number of attemptsProbability of a certain outcomeProbability of drawing colored MarblesProbability with changing number of marblesExpected number o f draws with replacement to reach probability.Probability that the first marble was blue, given the second is blueGiven a bag of 3 red marbles, 5 black, and 8 green, what is the probability that?A bag contains contains 20 blue marbles, 20 green marbles, and 20 red marblesMarble probability without replacement question

How to change the limits of integration

Access elements in std::string where positon of string is greater than its size

How is radar separation assured between primary and secondary targets?

Where does the "burst of radiance" from Holy Weapon originate?

How do you say "canon" as in "official for a story universe"?

How was Skylab's orbit inclination chosen?

Why is my p-value correlated to difference between means in two sample tests?

How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?

Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?

Why is Grand Jury testimony secret?

Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?

Falsification in Math vs Science

I see my dog run

Limit the amount of RAM Mathematica may access?

How to manage monthly salary

Potential by Assembling Charges

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?

In microwave frequencies, do you use a circulator when you need a (near) perfect diode?

Understanding the implication of what "well-defined" means for the operation in quotient group

The difference between dialogue marks

What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?

Can the Protection from Evil and Good spell be used on the caster?

What tool would a Roman-age civilization have to grind silver and other metals into dust?

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky



Basic combinations logic doubt in probability



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InProbability of picking three marbles in ordergetting an outcome x number of attemptsProbability of a certain outcomeProbability of drawing colored MarblesProbability with changing number of marblesExpected number o f draws with replacement to reach probability.Probability that the first marble was blue, given the second is blueGiven a bag of 3 red marbles, 5 black, and 8 green, what is the probability that?A bag contains contains 20 blue marbles, 20 green marbles, and 20 red marblesMarble probability without replacement question










3












$begingroup$



"If $3$ students are chosen at random from a class with $6$ girls and $4$ boys, what is the probability that all $3$ students chosen will be girls?"



$left(dfrac610right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)$




So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?



"A bag holds $4$ red marbles, $5$ blue marbles, and $2$ green marbles. If $5$ marbles are selected one after another without replacement, what is the probability of drawing $2$ red marbles, $2$ blue marbles, and $1$ green marble?"



My answer: $left(dfrac411right)left(dfrac310right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)left(dfrac27right)$



But the correct answer is $dfrac(_4C_2) cdot (_5C_2) cdot (_2C_1)_11C_5$ (where $C$ is a combination).



Why doesn't the logic from the first problem work here?



The draws are without replacement in all cases.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    2 days ago
















3












$begingroup$



"If $3$ students are chosen at random from a class with $6$ girls and $4$ boys, what is the probability that all $3$ students chosen will be girls?"



$left(dfrac610right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)$




So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?



"A bag holds $4$ red marbles, $5$ blue marbles, and $2$ green marbles. If $5$ marbles are selected one after another without replacement, what is the probability of drawing $2$ red marbles, $2$ blue marbles, and $1$ green marble?"



My answer: $left(dfrac411right)left(dfrac310right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)left(dfrac27right)$



But the correct answer is $dfrac(_4C_2) cdot (_5C_2) cdot (_2C_1)_11C_5$ (where $C$ is a combination).



Why doesn't the logic from the first problem work here?



The draws are without replacement in all cases.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    2 days ago














3












3








3


2



$begingroup$



"If $3$ students are chosen at random from a class with $6$ girls and $4$ boys, what is the probability that all $3$ students chosen will be girls?"



$left(dfrac610right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)$




So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?



"A bag holds $4$ red marbles, $5$ blue marbles, and $2$ green marbles. If $5$ marbles are selected one after another without replacement, what is the probability of drawing $2$ red marbles, $2$ blue marbles, and $1$ green marble?"



My answer: $left(dfrac411right)left(dfrac310right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)left(dfrac27right)$



But the correct answer is $dfrac(_4C_2) cdot (_5C_2) cdot (_2C_1)_11C_5$ (where $C$ is a combination).



Why doesn't the logic from the first problem work here?



The draws are without replacement in all cases.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





"If $3$ students are chosen at random from a class with $6$ girls and $4$ boys, what is the probability that all $3$ students chosen will be girls?"



$left(dfrac610right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)$




So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?



"A bag holds $4$ red marbles, $5$ blue marbles, and $2$ green marbles. If $5$ marbles are selected one after another without replacement, what is the probability of drawing $2$ red marbles, $2$ blue marbles, and $1$ green marble?"



My answer: $left(dfrac411right)left(dfrac310right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)left(dfrac27right)$



But the correct answer is $dfrac(_4C_2) cdot (_5C_2) cdot (_2C_1)_11C_5$ (where $C$ is a combination).



Why doesn't the logic from the first problem work here?



The draws are without replacement in all cases.







probability combinatorics permutations combinations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Bladewood

337213




337213










asked 2 days ago









LuckyLucky

295




295











  • $begingroup$
    Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    2 days ago

















  • $begingroup$
    Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    2 days ago
















$begingroup$
Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
$endgroup$
– NoChance
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
$endgroup$
– NoChance
2 days ago












$begingroup$
@NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
$endgroup$
– Lucky
2 days ago





$begingroup$
@NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
$endgroup$
– Lucky
2 days ago











4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.



To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
$$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$



Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
$$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    10 hours ago


















5












$begingroup$


"So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"




Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".



Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".



If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).



You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    10 hours ago


















0












$begingroup$

The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.



This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.



We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:



(6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)



which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
    $endgroup$
    – Ister
    2 days ago


















0












$begingroup$

The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
$$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.



Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177997%2fbasic-combinations-logic-doubt-in-probability%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7












    $begingroup$

    What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.



    To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
    $$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$



    Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
    $$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      10 hours ago















    7












    $begingroup$

    What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.



    To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
    $$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$



    Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
    $$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      10 hours ago













    7












    7








    7





    $begingroup$

    What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.



    To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
    $$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$



    Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
    $$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.



    To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
    $$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$



    Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
    $$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 2 days ago









    N. F. TaussigN. F. Taussig

    45.1k103358




    45.1k103358







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      10 hours ago












    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      10 hours ago







    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    10 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    10 hours ago











    5












    $begingroup$


    "So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"




    Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".



    Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".



    If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).



    You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      10 hours ago















    5












    $begingroup$


    "So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"




    Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".



    Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".



    If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).



    You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      10 hours ago













    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$


    "So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"




    Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".



    Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".



    If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).



    You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$




    "So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"




    Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".



    Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".



    If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).



    You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 2 days ago









    Jacob Jones

    14311




    14311










    answered 2 days ago









    drhabdrhab

    104k545136




    104k545136











    • $begingroup$
      Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      10 hours ago
















    • $begingroup$
      Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      10 hours ago















    $begingroup$
    Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    10 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    10 hours ago











    0












    $begingroup$

    The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.



    This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.



    We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:



    (6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)



    which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      2 days ago











    • $begingroup$
      also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      2 days ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
      $endgroup$
      – Ister
      2 days ago















    0












    $begingroup$

    The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.



    This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.



    We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:



    (6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)



    which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      2 days ago











    • $begingroup$
      also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      2 days ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
      $endgroup$
      – Ister
      2 days ago













    0












    0








    0





    $begingroup$

    The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.



    This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.



    We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:



    (6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)



    which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.



    This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.



    We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:



    (6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)



    which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 2 days ago









    jflippjflipp

    3,7511711




    3,7511711











    • $begingroup$
      so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      2 days ago











    • $begingroup$
      also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      2 days ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
      $endgroup$
      – Ister
      2 days ago
















    • $begingroup$
      so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      2 days ago











    • $begingroup$
      also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      2 days ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
      $endgroup$
      – Ister
      2 days ago















    $begingroup$
    so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    2 days ago





    $begingroup$
    so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    2 days ago













    $begingroup$
    also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    2 days ago




    $begingroup$
    also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    2 days ago












    $begingroup$
    @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
    $endgroup$
    – Ister
    2 days ago




    $begingroup$
    @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
    $endgroup$
    – Ister
    2 days ago











    0












    $begingroup$

    The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
    $$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
    Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.



    Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      0












      $begingroup$

      The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
      $$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
      Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.



      Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
        $$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
        Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.



        Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
        $$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
        Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.



        Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 2 days ago









        farruhotafarruhota

        21.9k2842




        21.9k2842



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177997%2fbasic-combinations-logic-doubt-in-probability%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -combinations, combinatorics, permutations, probability

            Popular posts from this blog

            Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god existsWord for having a definite opinion while simultaneously withholding judgment?What's the opposite of “newcomer? Is ”veteran" OK?What do you call an “atheist” who might believe in an afterlife?What's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Word for someone who dismisses contrary opinions as irrational?Somone who thinks they are overly special/out of the ordinaryIs there a word, phrase or idiom for “a person who is incapable of thinking about the future”?The belief that a god is human-likeA word for a non-famous person/thing you have heard a lot aboutAdjective for a person who enjoys taking care of their appearance

            2017 IndyCar Series Contents Series news Teams and drivers Schedule Season summary Footnotes References External links Navigation menu"INDYCAR: Initial 2018 bodywork concepts unveiled"the original"IndyCar confirms switch to Performance Friction brakes in 2017""AJ Foyt Racing will switch to Chevy"the original"Carlos Munoz, Conor Daly will drive for AJ Foyt Racing""Zach Veach's Indy 500 Debut Confirmed with Foyt""No mass exodus from Honda after Ganassi switch""Ex-F1 driver Sato joins Andretti Autosport for 2017 IndyCar season""IndyCar's Ryan Hunter-Reay, sponsor DHL paired through 2020""hhgregg and Andretti Autosport announce partnership for key races in 2016""INDYCAR: Rossi re-signs with Andretti"the original"McLaren Formula 1 - Fernando Alonso to race at Indy 500 with McLaren, Honda and Andretti Autosport""Shank will finally take part in Indy 500 with Harvey, Andretti | MotorSportsTalk""Andretti adds Jack Harvey to Indy 500 field""Ganassi switches to Honda power for 2017""INDYCAR: Chilton returns to Ganassi"the original"IndyCar silly season: Who's going where in 2017?""INDYCAR: Kanaan, NTT Data return to Ganassi"the original"Kimball to remain at Ganassi for 2017""Coyne confirms Bourdais for 2017 IndyCar season""Davison to sub for Bourdais in Indy 500"the original"Gutierrez confirmed for Detroit IndyCar debut""Gutierrez returns with Coyne for rest of 2017 season""Vautier to drive for Coyne at Texas"the original"INDYCAR: Coyne confirms Jones for 2017"the original"Pippa Mann returns to Coyne for Indy 500""Karam, Dreyer & Reinbold teaming up again for Indianapolis 500""Pigot to return to Ed Carpenter Racing""Hildebrand confirmed as full-time Ed Carpenter driver""Veach to replace injured Hildebrand at Barber"the originalNew Team Harding Racing Enters Chaves for 101st Indianapolis 500"Juncos Racing Announces Entry in 101st Running of the Indianapolis 500 :: Juncos Racing""Juncos confirms Pigot for Indy 500""Saavedra confirmed in Juncos' second 500 entry"the original"Lazier confirms Indy 500 run after son's USF2000 debut"the original"Claman DeMelo to race for RLLR at Sonoma"the original"Rahal signs Servia and ace engineer for 2017""IndyCar: Aleshin returns with Schmidt"the original"Aleshin replaced by Saavedra for Toronto""Jack Harvey will pilot SPM No. 7 car at Watkins Glen, Sonoma""Jay Howard confirmed in Tony Stewart's supported SPM Indy entry""INDYCAR: Newgarden to wave the flag at Penske"the original"Pagenaud opts for No. 1 in 2017"the original"Penske confirms Newgarden for 2017""Montoya to stay with Team Penske in 2017""Target leaving IndyCar after 27 seasons with Chip Ganassi""Cavin: IndyCar could see complete driver/team shakeup in 2017""End of the road for KV Racing?""KV Racing confirms closure, equipment sold to Juncos""Juncos confirms IndyCar Series entry"the original"Juncos readies IndyCar program, aims for '17 500"the original"Harding Racing to add Texas, Pocono to schedule"the original"Sato signs with Andretti Autosport for 2017""INDYCAR: Aleshin in Doubt at SPM"the original"Long Beach notebook: JR Hildebrand breaks hand""Hildebrand cleared to return at Phoenix"the original"Bourdais to undergo surgery on multiple fractures""Aleshin loses Schmidt Peterson IndyCar ride""Saavedra in at SPM for Pocono, Gateway"the original"Bourdais to make return at Gateway"the original"The IndyCar Grand Prix no longer is sponsored by Angie's List""2017 IndyCar Series rulebook""2017 Verizon IndyCar Series Official Rulebook"Official websiteeeeee

            Can I sign legal documents with a smiley face?Do Legal Documents Require Signing In Standard Pen Colors?Is it possible to legally prohibit someone from linking to specific pages on your website?Do scans of signed documents have the same legal power as the original document?What can I do if I signed an excessively restrictive contract?Can other party sneak in new contract terms via termination notice?How to prove that someone forged my signature on a contract that I was not aware of?In Australia, Is it legal to sign a document as somebody else?making a contract that includes video licenceLease dispute, over email and text messageIf you must include all of the natural language prose in a legal document, or if it can be abstracted outE-signing: legal ramifications of “identifying” a person