Basic combinations logic doubt in probability The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InProbability of picking three marbles in ordergetting an outcome x number of attemptsProbability of a certain outcomeProbability of drawing colored MarblesProbability with changing number of marblesExpected number o f draws with replacement to reach probability.Probability that the first marble was blue, given the second is blueGiven a bag of 3 red marbles, 5 black, and 8 green, what is the probability that?A bag contains contains 20 blue marbles, 20 green marbles, and 20 red marblesMarble probability without replacement question

How to change the limits of integration

Access elements in std::string where positon of string is greater than its size

How is radar separation assured between primary and secondary targets?

Where does the "burst of radiance" from Holy Weapon originate?

How do you say "canon" as in "official for a story universe"?

How was Skylab's orbit inclination chosen?

Why is my p-value correlated to difference between means in two sample tests?

How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?

Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?

Why is Grand Jury testimony secret?

Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?

Falsification in Math vs Science

I see my dog run

Limit the amount of RAM Mathematica may access?

How to manage monthly salary

Potential by Assembling Charges

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?

In microwave frequencies, do you use a circulator when you need a (near) perfect diode?

Understanding the implication of what "well-defined" means for the operation in quotient group

The difference between dialogue marks

What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?

Can the Protection from Evil and Good spell be used on the caster?

What tool would a Roman-age civilization have to grind silver and other metals into dust?

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky



Basic combinations logic doubt in probability



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InProbability of picking three marbles in ordergetting an outcome x number of attemptsProbability of a certain outcomeProbability of drawing colored MarblesProbability with changing number of marblesExpected number o f draws with replacement to reach probability.Probability that the first marble was blue, given the second is blueGiven a bag of 3 red marbles, 5 black, and 8 green, what is the probability that?A bag contains contains 20 blue marbles, 20 green marbles, and 20 red marblesMarble probability without replacement question










3












$begingroup$



"If $3$ students are chosen at random from a class with $6$ girls and $4$ boys, what is the probability that all $3$ students chosen will be girls?"



$left(dfrac610right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)$




So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?



"A bag holds $4$ red marbles, $5$ blue marbles, and $2$ green marbles. If $5$ marbles are selected one after another without replacement, what is the probability of drawing $2$ red marbles, $2$ blue marbles, and $1$ green marble?"



My answer: $left(dfrac411right)left(dfrac310right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)left(dfrac27right)$



But the correct answer is $dfrac(_4C_2) cdot (_5C_2) cdot (_2C_1)_11C_5$ (where $C$ is a combination).



Why doesn't the logic from the first problem work here?



The draws are without replacement in all cases.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    2 days ago
















3












$begingroup$



"If $3$ students are chosen at random from a class with $6$ girls and $4$ boys, what is the probability that all $3$ students chosen will be girls?"



$left(dfrac610right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)$




So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?



"A bag holds $4$ red marbles, $5$ blue marbles, and $2$ green marbles. If $5$ marbles are selected one after another without replacement, what is the probability of drawing $2$ red marbles, $2$ blue marbles, and $1$ green marble?"



My answer: $left(dfrac411right)left(dfrac310right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)left(dfrac27right)$



But the correct answer is $dfrac(_4C_2) cdot (_5C_2) cdot (_2C_1)_11C_5$ (where $C$ is a combination).



Why doesn't the logic from the first problem work here?



The draws are without replacement in all cases.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    2 days ago














3












3








3


2



$begingroup$



"If $3$ students are chosen at random from a class with $6$ girls and $4$ boys, what is the probability that all $3$ students chosen will be girls?"



$left(dfrac610right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)$




So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?



"A bag holds $4$ red marbles, $5$ blue marbles, and $2$ green marbles. If $5$ marbles are selected one after another without replacement, what is the probability of drawing $2$ red marbles, $2$ blue marbles, and $1$ green marble?"



My answer: $left(dfrac411right)left(dfrac310right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)left(dfrac27right)$



But the correct answer is $dfrac(_4C_2) cdot (_5C_2) cdot (_2C_1)_11C_5$ (where $C$ is a combination).



Why doesn't the logic from the first problem work here?



The draws are without replacement in all cases.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





"If $3$ students are chosen at random from a class with $6$ girls and $4$ boys, what is the probability that all $3$ students chosen will be girls?"



$left(dfrac610right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)$




So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?



"A bag holds $4$ red marbles, $5$ blue marbles, and $2$ green marbles. If $5$ marbles are selected one after another without replacement, what is the probability of drawing $2$ red marbles, $2$ blue marbles, and $1$ green marble?"



My answer: $left(dfrac411right)left(dfrac310right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)left(dfrac27right)$



But the correct answer is $dfrac(_4C_2) cdot (_5C_2) cdot (_2C_1)_11C_5$ (where $C$ is a combination).



Why doesn't the logic from the first problem work here?



The draws are without replacement in all cases.







probability combinatorics permutations combinations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Bladewood

337213




337213










asked 2 days ago









LuckyLucky

295




295











  • $begingroup$
    Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    2 days ago

















  • $begingroup$
    Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    2 days ago
















$begingroup$
Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
$endgroup$
– NoChance
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
$endgroup$
– NoChance
2 days ago












$begingroup$
@NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
$endgroup$
– Lucky
2 days ago





$begingroup$
@NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
$endgroup$
– Lucky
2 days ago











4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.



To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
$$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$



Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
$$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    10 hours ago


















5












$begingroup$


"So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"




Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".



Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".



If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).



You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    10 hours ago


















0












$begingroup$

The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.



This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.



We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:



(6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)



which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
    $endgroup$
    – Ister
    2 days ago


















0












$begingroup$

The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
$$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.



Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177997%2fbasic-combinations-logic-doubt-in-probability%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7












    $begingroup$

    What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.



    To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
    $$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$



    Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
    $$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      10 hours ago















    7












    $begingroup$

    What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.



    To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
    $$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$



    Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
    $$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      10 hours ago













    7












    7








    7





    $begingroup$

    What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.



    To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
    $$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$



    Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
    $$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.



    To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
    $$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$



    Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
    $$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 2 days ago









    N. F. TaussigN. F. Taussig

    45.1k103358




    45.1k103358







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      10 hours ago












    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      10 hours ago







    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    10 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    10 hours ago











    5












    $begingroup$


    "So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"




    Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".



    Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".



    If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).



    You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      10 hours ago















    5












    $begingroup$


    "So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"




    Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".



    Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".



    If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).



    You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      10 hours ago













    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$


    "So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"




    Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".



    Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".



    If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).



    You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$




    "So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"




    Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".



    Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".



    If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).



    You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 2 days ago









    Jacob Jones

    14311




    14311










    answered 2 days ago









    drhabdrhab

    104k545136




    104k545136











    • $begingroup$
      Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      10 hours ago
















    • $begingroup$
      Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      10 hours ago















    $begingroup$
    Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    10 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    10 hours ago











    0












    $begingroup$

    The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.



    This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.



    We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:



    (6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)



    which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      2 days ago











    • $begingroup$
      also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      2 days ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
      $endgroup$
      – Ister
      2 days ago















    0












    $begingroup$

    The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.



    This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.



    We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:



    (6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)



    which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      2 days ago











    • $begingroup$
      also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      2 days ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
      $endgroup$
      – Ister
      2 days ago













    0












    0








    0





    $begingroup$

    The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.



    This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.



    We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:



    (6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)



    which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.



    This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.



    We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:



    (6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)



    which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 2 days ago









    jflippjflipp

    3,7511711




    3,7511711











    • $begingroup$
      so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      2 days ago











    • $begingroup$
      also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      2 days ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
      $endgroup$
      – Ister
      2 days ago
















    • $begingroup$
      so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      2 days ago











    • $begingroup$
      also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      2 days ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
      $endgroup$
      – Ister
      2 days ago















    $begingroup$
    so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    2 days ago





    $begingroup$
    so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    2 days ago













    $begingroup$
    also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    2 days ago




    $begingroup$
    also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    2 days ago












    $begingroup$
    @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
    $endgroup$
    – Ister
    2 days ago




    $begingroup$
    @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
    $endgroup$
    – Ister
    2 days ago











    0












    $begingroup$

    The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
    $$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
    Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.



    Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      0












      $begingroup$

      The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
      $$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
      Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.



      Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
        $$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
        Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.



        Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
        $$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
        Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.



        Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 2 days ago









        farruhotafarruhota

        21.9k2842




        21.9k2842



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177997%2fbasic-combinations-logic-doubt-in-probability%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -combinations, combinatorics, permutations, probability

            Popular posts from this blog

            Mobil Contents History Mobil brands Former Mobil brands Lukoil transaction Mobil UK Mobil Australia Mobil New Zealand Mobil Greece Mobil in Japan Mobil in Canada Mobil Egypt See also References External links Navigation menuwww.mobil.com"Mobil Corporation"the original"Our Houston campus""Business & Finance: Socony-Vacuum Corp.""Popular Mechanics""Lubrite Technologies""Exxon Mobil campus 'clearly happening'""Toledo Blade - Google News Archive Search""The Lion and the Moose - How 2 Executives Pulled off the Biggest Merger Ever""ExxonMobil Press Release""Lubricants""Archived copy"the original"Mobil 1™ and Mobil Super™ motor oil and synthetic motor oil - Mobil™ Motor Oils""Mobil Delvac""Mobil Industrial website""The State of Competition in Gasoline Marketing: The Effects of Refiner Operations at Retail""Mobil Travel Guide to become Forbes Travel Guide""Hotel Rankings: Forbes Merges with Mobil"the original"Jamieson oil industry history""Mobil news""Caltex pumps for control""Watchdog blocks Caltex bid""Exxon Mobil sells service station network""Mobil Oil New Zealand Limited is New Zealand's oldest oil company, with predecessor companies having first established a presence in the country in 1896""ExxonMobil subsidiaries have a business history in New Zealand stretching back more than 120 years. We are involved in petroleum refining and distribution and the marketing of fuels, lubricants and chemical products""Archived copy"the original"Exxon Mobil to Sell Its Japanese Arm for $3.9 Billion""Gas station merger will end Esso and Mobil's long run in Japan""Esso moves to affiliate itself with PC Optimum, no longer Aeroplan, in loyalty point switch""Mobil brand of gas stations to launch in Canada after deal for 213 Loblaws-owned locations""Mobil Nears Completion of Rebranding 200 Loblaw Gas Stations""Learn about ExxonMobil's operations in Egypt""Petrol and Diesel Service Stations in Egypt - Mobil"Official websiteExxon Mobil corporate websiteMobil Industrial official websiteeeeeeeeDA04275022275790-40000 0001 0860 5061n82045453134887257134887257

            Frič See also Navigation menuinternal link

            Identify plant with long narrow paired leaves and reddish stems Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?What is this plant with long sharp leaves? Is it a weed?What is this 3ft high, stalky plant, with mid sized narrow leaves?What is this young shrub with opposite ovate, crenate leaves and reddish stems?What is this plant with large broad serrated leaves?Identify this upright branching weed with long leaves and reddish stemsPlease help me identify this bulbous plant with long, broad leaves and white flowersWhat is this small annual with narrow gray/green leaves and rust colored daisy-type flowers?What is this chilli plant?Does anyone know what type of chilli plant this is?Help identify this plant