fontconfig warning: “/etc/fonts/fonts.conf”, line 100: unknown “element blank” The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In“tar: unrecognized option --warning” during 'apt-get install'How to fix Fontconfig errorHow do I figure out which font file is chosen for a system generic font alias?Why are some apt-get-installed fonts being ignored by fc-list, xfontsel, etc?Reload settings in /etc/fonts/conf.dTaking 30 seconds longer to boot after upgrade from jessie to stretchHow to match multiple font names with a single <match> element?Adding a custom font to fontconfigRemoving fonts from fontconfig <match> resultsBroken fonts after upgrading Firefox ESR to latest Firefox

How to type this arrow in math mode?

Multiply Two Integer Polynomials

What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?

Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric?

For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?

Can one be advised by a professor who is very far away?

Identify boardgame from Big movie

slides for 30min~1hr skype tenure track application interview

Why do we hear so much about the Trump administration deciding to impose and then remove tariffs?

If I score a critical hit on an 18 or higher, what are my chances of getting a critical hit if I roll 3d20?

Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?

Worn-tile Scrabble

Output the Arecibo Message

What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?

How are circuits which use complex ICs normally simulated?

Shouldn't "much" here be used instead of "more"?

Delete all lines which don't have n characters before delimiter

Aging parents with no investments

Can someone be penalized for an "unlawful" act if no penalty is specified?

Is this app Icon Browser Safe/Legit?

What is the closest word meaning "respect for time / mindful"

Is there a symbol for a right arrow with a square in the middle?

What are the motivations for publishing new editions of an existing textbook, beyond new discoveries in a field?

Protecting Dualbooting Windows from dangerous code (like rm -rf)



fontconfig warning: “/etc/fonts/fonts.conf”, line 100: unknown “element blank”



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In“tar: unrecognized option --warning” during 'apt-get install'How to fix Fontconfig errorHow do I figure out which font file is chosen for a system generic font alias?Why are some apt-get-installed fonts being ignored by fc-list, xfontsel, etc?Reload settings in /etc/fonts/conf.dTaking 30 seconds longer to boot after upgrade from jessie to stretchHow to match multiple font names with a single <match> element?Adding a custom font to fontconfigRemoving fonts from fontconfig <match> resultsBroken fonts after upgrading Firefox ESR to latest Firefox



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















Getting this error on my vps server:



fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/fonts.conf", line 100: unknown element "blank"


This is the file:



https://pastebin.com/VqcSgJ9x



How to fix it?










share|improve this question
























  • Getting the same error when trying to launch headless Chrome in a docker container - still digging.

    – Jacob Thomason
    Mar 8 at 23:05

















2















Getting this error on my vps server:



fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/fonts.conf", line 100: unknown element "blank"


This is the file:



https://pastebin.com/VqcSgJ9x



How to fix it?










share|improve this question
























  • Getting the same error when trying to launch headless Chrome in a docker container - still digging.

    – Jacob Thomason
    Mar 8 at 23:05













2












2








2








Getting this error on my vps server:



fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/fonts.conf", line 100: unknown element "blank"


This is the file:



https://pastebin.com/VqcSgJ9x



How to fix it?










share|improve this question
















Getting this error on my vps server:



fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/fonts.conf", line 100: unknown element "blank"


This is the file:



https://pastebin.com/VqcSgJ9x



How to fix it?







linux debian error-handling fontconfig






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 5 at 7:26







Ned St

















asked Mar 4 at 19:15









Ned StNed St

112




112












  • Getting the same error when trying to launch headless Chrome in a docker container - still digging.

    – Jacob Thomason
    Mar 8 at 23:05

















  • Getting the same error when trying to launch headless Chrome in a docker container - still digging.

    – Jacob Thomason
    Mar 8 at 23:05
















Getting the same error when trying to launch headless Chrome in a docker container - still digging.

– Jacob Thomason
Mar 8 at 23:05





Getting the same error when trying to launch headless Chrome in a docker container - still digging.

– Jacob Thomason
Mar 8 at 23:05










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














TL;DR: You should probably just ignore this warning.



If you feel a little bold you might try removing the <blank>...</blank> section from your /etc/fonts/fonts.conf file (maybe making a back-up first if you're not feeling quite so foolhardy). When I tried this, the warning went away. However, you may have noticed a scary looking message at the top of the file saying: DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE. IT WILL BE REPLACED WHEN FONTCONFIG IS UPDATED. LOCAL CHANGES BELONG IN 'local.conf'. So this was probably not the right solution. (If you wondering why I did it anyways: I didn't see a local.conf, was too lazy to read the fine manuals, and figured that my hack getting overwritten was more like a feature than a bug anyway since maintainers would likely publish an official solution later anyway -- besides I wanted to learn.)



OK, let's back up now. This is (unsurprisingly) related to fontconfig's <blank> element, whose usage is described in the fontconfig docs as




<blank>
Fonts often include "broken" glyphs which appear in the encoding but are drawn as blanks on the screen. Within the element, place each Unicode characters which is supposed to be blank in an element. Characters outside of this set which are drawn as blank will be elided from the set of characters supported by the font.




The docs suggest that there's nothing with having these options defined. Also, they are specified in the DTD.
However, you may have noticed a related fontconfig API called FcBlanks (emphasis mine):




An FcBlanks object holds a list of Unicode chars which are expected to be blank when drawn. When scanning new fonts, any glyphs which are empty and not in this list will be assumed to be broken and not placed in the FcCharSet associated with the font. This provides a significantly more accurate CharSet for applications.



FcBlanks is deprecated and should not be used in newly written code. It is still accepted by some functions for compatibility with older code but will be removed in the future.




This suggests to me that they are allowed in the configuration file for compatibility but are not intended to be used any more.



Without more information I'm not sure in what context you're seeing this warning, however, lately I've seen it a lot with chromium / electron / Google Chrome. Taking a peek at chromium's external/fontconfig's commit history I noticed:



commit dc8326d3f116bb2a1425aa68660a332e351b6cb4
Author: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@behdad.org>
Date: Fri Sep 15 01:20:56 2017 -0400

[fc-query] Remove --ignore-blanks / -b

Blanks are the new black, err, dead!

...

commit 8b46a518bda8ecb3c5e2dfb0c1e5fda99e40aa3e
Author: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@behdad.org>
Date: Tue Sep 12 17:08:08 2017 -0400

Update documentation for removal of blanks

Patch from Jerry Casiano.



You can also see this in the 2.12.91 change log.
I suspect that the warning started appearing around the time chromium updated to this (or newer) version of fontconfig. It looks like that happened around June 2018 / chromium 69. Peeking at the DEPS file and third_party/fontconfig/BUILD.gn suggests that ba206df9b9a7ca300265f650842c1459ff7c634a (a couple commits newer than 2.13.1) is used for embedded builds meanwhile ChromeOS and Linux will use "the system version." If I understand correctly that means that when building chromium on/for Linux, build/install-build-deps.sh would have installed the latest libfontconfig1 package provided by the distribution (in my case 2.11.0-6.7+b1). At this point I looked around a little bit for more information about how my build of chromium was compiled, specifically, but then I lost interest. I assume the maintainers try to keep it in step with the rest of the distribution.



In the end, if I'm not terribly mistaken, all this message really means is that the configuration file contains some information (other than comments) that will not be used by the program that output it.



See also:



  • https://askubuntu.com/questions/1018056/font-config-error-launching-google-chrome-stable-from-the-command-line-on-14-04#1018057

  • https://github.com/felixrieseberg/ember-electron/issues/386





share|improve this answer








New contributor




iX3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f504335%2ffontconfig-warning-etc-fonts-fonts-conf-line-100-unknown-element-blank%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    TL;DR: You should probably just ignore this warning.



    If you feel a little bold you might try removing the <blank>...</blank> section from your /etc/fonts/fonts.conf file (maybe making a back-up first if you're not feeling quite so foolhardy). When I tried this, the warning went away. However, you may have noticed a scary looking message at the top of the file saying: DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE. IT WILL BE REPLACED WHEN FONTCONFIG IS UPDATED. LOCAL CHANGES BELONG IN 'local.conf'. So this was probably not the right solution. (If you wondering why I did it anyways: I didn't see a local.conf, was too lazy to read the fine manuals, and figured that my hack getting overwritten was more like a feature than a bug anyway since maintainers would likely publish an official solution later anyway -- besides I wanted to learn.)



    OK, let's back up now. This is (unsurprisingly) related to fontconfig's <blank> element, whose usage is described in the fontconfig docs as




    <blank>
    Fonts often include "broken" glyphs which appear in the encoding but are drawn as blanks on the screen. Within the element, place each Unicode characters which is supposed to be blank in an element. Characters outside of this set which are drawn as blank will be elided from the set of characters supported by the font.




    The docs suggest that there's nothing with having these options defined. Also, they are specified in the DTD.
    However, you may have noticed a related fontconfig API called FcBlanks (emphasis mine):




    An FcBlanks object holds a list of Unicode chars which are expected to be blank when drawn. When scanning new fonts, any glyphs which are empty and not in this list will be assumed to be broken and not placed in the FcCharSet associated with the font. This provides a significantly more accurate CharSet for applications.



    FcBlanks is deprecated and should not be used in newly written code. It is still accepted by some functions for compatibility with older code but will be removed in the future.




    This suggests to me that they are allowed in the configuration file for compatibility but are not intended to be used any more.



    Without more information I'm not sure in what context you're seeing this warning, however, lately I've seen it a lot with chromium / electron / Google Chrome. Taking a peek at chromium's external/fontconfig's commit history I noticed:



    commit dc8326d3f116bb2a1425aa68660a332e351b6cb4
    Author: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@behdad.org>
    Date: Fri Sep 15 01:20:56 2017 -0400

    [fc-query] Remove --ignore-blanks / -b

    Blanks are the new black, err, dead!

    ...

    commit 8b46a518bda8ecb3c5e2dfb0c1e5fda99e40aa3e
    Author: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@behdad.org>
    Date: Tue Sep 12 17:08:08 2017 -0400

    Update documentation for removal of blanks

    Patch from Jerry Casiano.



    You can also see this in the 2.12.91 change log.
    I suspect that the warning started appearing around the time chromium updated to this (or newer) version of fontconfig. It looks like that happened around June 2018 / chromium 69. Peeking at the DEPS file and third_party/fontconfig/BUILD.gn suggests that ba206df9b9a7ca300265f650842c1459ff7c634a (a couple commits newer than 2.13.1) is used for embedded builds meanwhile ChromeOS and Linux will use "the system version." If I understand correctly that means that when building chromium on/for Linux, build/install-build-deps.sh would have installed the latest libfontconfig1 package provided by the distribution (in my case 2.11.0-6.7+b1). At this point I looked around a little bit for more information about how my build of chromium was compiled, specifically, but then I lost interest. I assume the maintainers try to keep it in step with the rest of the distribution.



    In the end, if I'm not terribly mistaken, all this message really means is that the configuration file contains some information (other than comments) that will not be used by the program that output it.



    See also:



    • https://askubuntu.com/questions/1018056/font-config-error-launching-google-chrome-stable-from-the-command-line-on-14-04#1018057

    • https://github.com/felixrieseberg/ember-electron/issues/386





    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    iX3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.
























      0














      TL;DR: You should probably just ignore this warning.



      If you feel a little bold you might try removing the <blank>...</blank> section from your /etc/fonts/fonts.conf file (maybe making a back-up first if you're not feeling quite so foolhardy). When I tried this, the warning went away. However, you may have noticed a scary looking message at the top of the file saying: DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE. IT WILL BE REPLACED WHEN FONTCONFIG IS UPDATED. LOCAL CHANGES BELONG IN 'local.conf'. So this was probably not the right solution. (If you wondering why I did it anyways: I didn't see a local.conf, was too lazy to read the fine manuals, and figured that my hack getting overwritten was more like a feature than a bug anyway since maintainers would likely publish an official solution later anyway -- besides I wanted to learn.)



      OK, let's back up now. This is (unsurprisingly) related to fontconfig's <blank> element, whose usage is described in the fontconfig docs as




      <blank>
      Fonts often include "broken" glyphs which appear in the encoding but are drawn as blanks on the screen. Within the element, place each Unicode characters which is supposed to be blank in an element. Characters outside of this set which are drawn as blank will be elided from the set of characters supported by the font.




      The docs suggest that there's nothing with having these options defined. Also, they are specified in the DTD.
      However, you may have noticed a related fontconfig API called FcBlanks (emphasis mine):




      An FcBlanks object holds a list of Unicode chars which are expected to be blank when drawn. When scanning new fonts, any glyphs which are empty and not in this list will be assumed to be broken and not placed in the FcCharSet associated with the font. This provides a significantly more accurate CharSet for applications.



      FcBlanks is deprecated and should not be used in newly written code. It is still accepted by some functions for compatibility with older code but will be removed in the future.




      This suggests to me that they are allowed in the configuration file for compatibility but are not intended to be used any more.



      Without more information I'm not sure in what context you're seeing this warning, however, lately I've seen it a lot with chromium / electron / Google Chrome. Taking a peek at chromium's external/fontconfig's commit history I noticed:



      commit dc8326d3f116bb2a1425aa68660a332e351b6cb4
      Author: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@behdad.org>
      Date: Fri Sep 15 01:20:56 2017 -0400

      [fc-query] Remove --ignore-blanks / -b

      Blanks are the new black, err, dead!

      ...

      commit 8b46a518bda8ecb3c5e2dfb0c1e5fda99e40aa3e
      Author: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@behdad.org>
      Date: Tue Sep 12 17:08:08 2017 -0400

      Update documentation for removal of blanks

      Patch from Jerry Casiano.



      You can also see this in the 2.12.91 change log.
      I suspect that the warning started appearing around the time chromium updated to this (or newer) version of fontconfig. It looks like that happened around June 2018 / chromium 69. Peeking at the DEPS file and third_party/fontconfig/BUILD.gn suggests that ba206df9b9a7ca300265f650842c1459ff7c634a (a couple commits newer than 2.13.1) is used for embedded builds meanwhile ChromeOS and Linux will use "the system version." If I understand correctly that means that when building chromium on/for Linux, build/install-build-deps.sh would have installed the latest libfontconfig1 package provided by the distribution (in my case 2.11.0-6.7+b1). At this point I looked around a little bit for more information about how my build of chromium was compiled, specifically, but then I lost interest. I assume the maintainers try to keep it in step with the rest of the distribution.



      In the end, if I'm not terribly mistaken, all this message really means is that the configuration file contains some information (other than comments) that will not be used by the program that output it.



      See also:



      • https://askubuntu.com/questions/1018056/font-config-error-launching-google-chrome-stable-from-the-command-line-on-14-04#1018057

      • https://github.com/felixrieseberg/ember-electron/issues/386





      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      iX3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















        0












        0








        0







        TL;DR: You should probably just ignore this warning.



        If you feel a little bold you might try removing the <blank>...</blank> section from your /etc/fonts/fonts.conf file (maybe making a back-up first if you're not feeling quite so foolhardy). When I tried this, the warning went away. However, you may have noticed a scary looking message at the top of the file saying: DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE. IT WILL BE REPLACED WHEN FONTCONFIG IS UPDATED. LOCAL CHANGES BELONG IN 'local.conf'. So this was probably not the right solution. (If you wondering why I did it anyways: I didn't see a local.conf, was too lazy to read the fine manuals, and figured that my hack getting overwritten was more like a feature than a bug anyway since maintainers would likely publish an official solution later anyway -- besides I wanted to learn.)



        OK, let's back up now. This is (unsurprisingly) related to fontconfig's <blank> element, whose usage is described in the fontconfig docs as




        <blank>
        Fonts often include "broken" glyphs which appear in the encoding but are drawn as blanks on the screen. Within the element, place each Unicode characters which is supposed to be blank in an element. Characters outside of this set which are drawn as blank will be elided from the set of characters supported by the font.




        The docs suggest that there's nothing with having these options defined. Also, they are specified in the DTD.
        However, you may have noticed a related fontconfig API called FcBlanks (emphasis mine):




        An FcBlanks object holds a list of Unicode chars which are expected to be blank when drawn. When scanning new fonts, any glyphs which are empty and not in this list will be assumed to be broken and not placed in the FcCharSet associated with the font. This provides a significantly more accurate CharSet for applications.



        FcBlanks is deprecated and should not be used in newly written code. It is still accepted by some functions for compatibility with older code but will be removed in the future.




        This suggests to me that they are allowed in the configuration file for compatibility but are not intended to be used any more.



        Without more information I'm not sure in what context you're seeing this warning, however, lately I've seen it a lot with chromium / electron / Google Chrome. Taking a peek at chromium's external/fontconfig's commit history I noticed:



        commit dc8326d3f116bb2a1425aa68660a332e351b6cb4
        Author: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@behdad.org>
        Date: Fri Sep 15 01:20:56 2017 -0400

        [fc-query] Remove --ignore-blanks / -b

        Blanks are the new black, err, dead!

        ...

        commit 8b46a518bda8ecb3c5e2dfb0c1e5fda99e40aa3e
        Author: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@behdad.org>
        Date: Tue Sep 12 17:08:08 2017 -0400

        Update documentation for removal of blanks

        Patch from Jerry Casiano.



        You can also see this in the 2.12.91 change log.
        I suspect that the warning started appearing around the time chromium updated to this (or newer) version of fontconfig. It looks like that happened around June 2018 / chromium 69. Peeking at the DEPS file and third_party/fontconfig/BUILD.gn suggests that ba206df9b9a7ca300265f650842c1459ff7c634a (a couple commits newer than 2.13.1) is used for embedded builds meanwhile ChromeOS and Linux will use "the system version." If I understand correctly that means that when building chromium on/for Linux, build/install-build-deps.sh would have installed the latest libfontconfig1 package provided by the distribution (in my case 2.11.0-6.7+b1). At this point I looked around a little bit for more information about how my build of chromium was compiled, specifically, but then I lost interest. I assume the maintainers try to keep it in step with the rest of the distribution.



        In the end, if I'm not terribly mistaken, all this message really means is that the configuration file contains some information (other than comments) that will not be used by the program that output it.



        See also:



        • https://askubuntu.com/questions/1018056/font-config-error-launching-google-chrome-stable-from-the-command-line-on-14-04#1018057

        • https://github.com/felixrieseberg/ember-electron/issues/386





        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        iX3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.










        TL;DR: You should probably just ignore this warning.



        If you feel a little bold you might try removing the <blank>...</blank> section from your /etc/fonts/fonts.conf file (maybe making a back-up first if you're not feeling quite so foolhardy). When I tried this, the warning went away. However, you may have noticed a scary looking message at the top of the file saying: DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE. IT WILL BE REPLACED WHEN FONTCONFIG IS UPDATED. LOCAL CHANGES BELONG IN 'local.conf'. So this was probably not the right solution. (If you wondering why I did it anyways: I didn't see a local.conf, was too lazy to read the fine manuals, and figured that my hack getting overwritten was more like a feature than a bug anyway since maintainers would likely publish an official solution later anyway -- besides I wanted to learn.)



        OK, let's back up now. This is (unsurprisingly) related to fontconfig's <blank> element, whose usage is described in the fontconfig docs as




        <blank>
        Fonts often include "broken" glyphs which appear in the encoding but are drawn as blanks on the screen. Within the element, place each Unicode characters which is supposed to be blank in an element. Characters outside of this set which are drawn as blank will be elided from the set of characters supported by the font.




        The docs suggest that there's nothing with having these options defined. Also, they are specified in the DTD.
        However, you may have noticed a related fontconfig API called FcBlanks (emphasis mine):




        An FcBlanks object holds a list of Unicode chars which are expected to be blank when drawn. When scanning new fonts, any glyphs which are empty and not in this list will be assumed to be broken and not placed in the FcCharSet associated with the font. This provides a significantly more accurate CharSet for applications.



        FcBlanks is deprecated and should not be used in newly written code. It is still accepted by some functions for compatibility with older code but will be removed in the future.




        This suggests to me that they are allowed in the configuration file for compatibility but are not intended to be used any more.



        Without more information I'm not sure in what context you're seeing this warning, however, lately I've seen it a lot with chromium / electron / Google Chrome. Taking a peek at chromium's external/fontconfig's commit history I noticed:



        commit dc8326d3f116bb2a1425aa68660a332e351b6cb4
        Author: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@behdad.org>
        Date: Fri Sep 15 01:20:56 2017 -0400

        [fc-query] Remove --ignore-blanks / -b

        Blanks are the new black, err, dead!

        ...

        commit 8b46a518bda8ecb3c5e2dfb0c1e5fda99e40aa3e
        Author: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@behdad.org>
        Date: Tue Sep 12 17:08:08 2017 -0400

        Update documentation for removal of blanks

        Patch from Jerry Casiano.



        You can also see this in the 2.12.91 change log.
        I suspect that the warning started appearing around the time chromium updated to this (or newer) version of fontconfig. It looks like that happened around June 2018 / chromium 69. Peeking at the DEPS file and third_party/fontconfig/BUILD.gn suggests that ba206df9b9a7ca300265f650842c1459ff7c634a (a couple commits newer than 2.13.1) is used for embedded builds meanwhile ChromeOS and Linux will use "the system version." If I understand correctly that means that when building chromium on/for Linux, build/install-build-deps.sh would have installed the latest libfontconfig1 package provided by the distribution (in my case 2.11.0-6.7+b1). At this point I looked around a little bit for more information about how my build of chromium was compiled, specifically, but then I lost interest. I assume the maintainers try to keep it in step with the rest of the distribution.



        In the end, if I'm not terribly mistaken, all this message really means is that the configuration file contains some information (other than comments) that will not be used by the program that output it.



        See also:



        • https://askubuntu.com/questions/1018056/font-config-error-launching-google-chrome-stable-from-the-command-line-on-14-04#1018057

        • https://github.com/felixrieseberg/ember-electron/issues/386






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        iX3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer






        New contributor




        iX3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 2 days ago









        iX3iX3

        1034




        1034




        New contributor




        iX3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        iX3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        iX3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f504335%2ffontconfig-warning-etc-fonts-fonts-conf-line-100-unknown-element-blank%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -debian, error-handling, fontconfig, linux

            Popular posts from this blog

            Mobil Contents History Mobil brands Former Mobil brands Lukoil transaction Mobil UK Mobil Australia Mobil New Zealand Mobil Greece Mobil in Japan Mobil in Canada Mobil Egypt See also References External links Navigation menuwww.mobil.com"Mobil Corporation"the original"Our Houston campus""Business & Finance: Socony-Vacuum Corp.""Popular Mechanics""Lubrite Technologies""Exxon Mobil campus 'clearly happening'""Toledo Blade - Google News Archive Search""The Lion and the Moose - How 2 Executives Pulled off the Biggest Merger Ever""ExxonMobil Press Release""Lubricants""Archived copy"the original"Mobil 1™ and Mobil Super™ motor oil and synthetic motor oil - Mobil™ Motor Oils""Mobil Delvac""Mobil Industrial website""The State of Competition in Gasoline Marketing: The Effects of Refiner Operations at Retail""Mobil Travel Guide to become Forbes Travel Guide""Hotel Rankings: Forbes Merges with Mobil"the original"Jamieson oil industry history""Mobil news""Caltex pumps for control""Watchdog blocks Caltex bid""Exxon Mobil sells service station network""Mobil Oil New Zealand Limited is New Zealand's oldest oil company, with predecessor companies having first established a presence in the country in 1896""ExxonMobil subsidiaries have a business history in New Zealand stretching back more than 120 years. We are involved in petroleum refining and distribution and the marketing of fuels, lubricants and chemical products""Archived copy"the original"Exxon Mobil to Sell Its Japanese Arm for $3.9 Billion""Gas station merger will end Esso and Mobil's long run in Japan""Esso moves to affiliate itself with PC Optimum, no longer Aeroplan, in loyalty point switch""Mobil brand of gas stations to launch in Canada after deal for 213 Loblaws-owned locations""Mobil Nears Completion of Rebranding 200 Loblaw Gas Stations""Learn about ExxonMobil's operations in Egypt""Petrol and Diesel Service Stations in Egypt - Mobil"Official websiteExxon Mobil corporate websiteMobil Industrial official websiteeeeeeeeDA04275022275790-40000 0001 0860 5061n82045453134887257134887257

            Frič See also Navigation menuinternal link

            Identify plant with long narrow paired leaves and reddish stems Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?What is this plant with long sharp leaves? Is it a weed?What is this 3ft high, stalky plant, with mid sized narrow leaves?What is this young shrub with opposite ovate, crenate leaves and reddish stems?What is this plant with large broad serrated leaves?Identify this upright branching weed with long leaves and reddish stemsPlease help me identify this bulbous plant with long, broad leaves and white flowersWhat is this small annual with narrow gray/green leaves and rust colored daisy-type flowers?What is this chilli plant?Does anyone know what type of chilli plant this is?Help identify this plant