LWC and complex parameters The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow do I pass a SObject record from LWC to a custom Apex method to persist data?Apex Prepopulated Email bodyNeed help writing test Apex ClasseHow to pass a variable's value of child visualforce page to a variable in parent visualforce using jsI am getting Exception FATAL_ERROR|System. LimitException: Maximum stack depth reached: 12Not able to escape quote in visualforce page?fault string: No such parameter param defined for the operation, please check the WSDL for the servicewhat is wrong in this codeNeed to add field in apex class email template - not workingWhy is my Approval Process instance not creating NewWorkItems?Is there any help/ hint while attending trailhead challenge?
How to manage monthly salary
What is the meaning of the verb "bear" in this context?
Can one be advised by a professor who is very far away?
Why do we hear so much about the Trump administration deciding to impose and then remove tariffs?
Return to UK after having been refused entry years ago
Is a "Democratic" Oligarchy-Style System Possible?
What is the most effective way of iterating a std::vector and why?
Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"
A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky
How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect
Does the shape of a die affect the probability of a number being rolled?
Falsification in Math vs Science
Why is the maximum length of OpenWrt’s root password 8 characters?
Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?
Did 3000BC Egyptians use meteoric iron weapons?
Why hard-Brexiteers don't insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?
What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation
Am I thawing this London Broil safely?
Feature engineering suggestion required
If a Druid sees an animal’s corpse, can they Wild Shape into that animal?
Protecting Dualbooting Windows from dangerous code (like rm -rf)
What tool would a Roman-age civilization have for the breaking of silver and other metals into dust?
Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit
Loose spokes after only a few rides
LWC and complex parameters
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow do I pass a SObject record from LWC to a custom Apex method to persist data?Apex Prepopulated Email bodyNeed help writing test Apex ClasseHow to pass a variable's value of child visualforce page to a variable in parent visualforce using jsI am getting Exception FATAL_ERROR|System. LimitException: Maximum stack depth reached: 12Not able to escape quote in visualforce page?fault string: No such parameter param defined for the operation, please check the WSDL for the servicewhat is wrong in this codeNeed to add field in apex class email template - not workingWhy is my Approval Process instance not creating NewWorkItems?Is there any help/ hint while attending trailhead challenge?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I am trying to pass a list of objects to Apex from an LWC controller, and it looks like the Apex controller is getting the right sized list, but nothing is populated. Does anybody have any idea of what could be the problem?
Component JS code
refreshPeople()
let xxx = [];
xxx.push(name : 'aaa', email : 'bbb');
xxx.push(name : '111', email : '222');
getPeople(peopleInfo: xxx)
.then(result =>
console.log('#### HERE');
this.allPeople2 = result;
)
.catch(error =>
//Error Handling goes here
);
Apex:
@AuraEnabled(cacheable = true)
public static List<EmailPerson> getPeople(List<EmailPerson> peopleInfo)
try
System.debug('####' + peopleInfo);
return null;
catch (Exception e)
throw new AuraHandledException(e.getMessage() + ' ' + e.getStackTraceString());
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id;
@AuraEnabled
public String name;
@AuraEnabled
public String email;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName;
Note: I've tried @wire
, the behavior is the same. The list sees the two items, but none the values on the properties are assigned
<17:00:38:006 USER_DEBUG [20]|DEBUG|####(EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null], EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null])
apex lightning-web-components
add a comment |
I am trying to pass a list of objects to Apex from an LWC controller, and it looks like the Apex controller is getting the right sized list, but nothing is populated. Does anybody have any idea of what could be the problem?
Component JS code
refreshPeople()
let xxx = [];
xxx.push(name : 'aaa', email : 'bbb');
xxx.push(name : '111', email : '222');
getPeople(peopleInfo: xxx)
.then(result =>
console.log('#### HERE');
this.allPeople2 = result;
)
.catch(error =>
//Error Handling goes here
);
Apex:
@AuraEnabled(cacheable = true)
public static List<EmailPerson> getPeople(List<EmailPerson> peopleInfo)
try
System.debug('####' + peopleInfo);
return null;
catch (Exception e)
throw new AuraHandledException(e.getMessage() + ' ' + e.getStackTraceString());
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id;
@AuraEnabled
public String name;
@AuraEnabled
public String email;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName;
Note: I've tried @wire
, the behavior is the same. The list sees the two items, but none the values on the properties are assigned
<17:00:38:006 USER_DEBUG [20]|DEBUG|####(EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null], EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null])
apex lightning-web-components
add a comment |
I am trying to pass a list of objects to Apex from an LWC controller, and it looks like the Apex controller is getting the right sized list, but nothing is populated. Does anybody have any idea of what could be the problem?
Component JS code
refreshPeople()
let xxx = [];
xxx.push(name : 'aaa', email : 'bbb');
xxx.push(name : '111', email : '222');
getPeople(peopleInfo: xxx)
.then(result =>
console.log('#### HERE');
this.allPeople2 = result;
)
.catch(error =>
//Error Handling goes here
);
Apex:
@AuraEnabled(cacheable = true)
public static List<EmailPerson> getPeople(List<EmailPerson> peopleInfo)
try
System.debug('####' + peopleInfo);
return null;
catch (Exception e)
throw new AuraHandledException(e.getMessage() + ' ' + e.getStackTraceString());
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id;
@AuraEnabled
public String name;
@AuraEnabled
public String email;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName;
Note: I've tried @wire
, the behavior is the same. The list sees the two items, but none the values on the properties are assigned
<17:00:38:006 USER_DEBUG [20]|DEBUG|####(EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null], EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null])
apex lightning-web-components
I am trying to pass a list of objects to Apex from an LWC controller, and it looks like the Apex controller is getting the right sized list, but nothing is populated. Does anybody have any idea of what could be the problem?
Component JS code
refreshPeople()
let xxx = [];
xxx.push(name : 'aaa', email : 'bbb');
xxx.push(name : '111', email : '222');
getPeople(peopleInfo: xxx)
.then(result =>
console.log('#### HERE');
this.allPeople2 = result;
)
.catch(error =>
//Error Handling goes here
);
Apex:
@AuraEnabled(cacheable = true)
public static List<EmailPerson> getPeople(List<EmailPerson> peopleInfo)
try
System.debug('####' + peopleInfo);
return null;
catch (Exception e)
throw new AuraHandledException(e.getMessage() + ' ' + e.getStackTraceString());
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id;
@AuraEnabled
public String name;
@AuraEnabled
public String email;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName;
Note: I've tried @wire
, the behavior is the same. The list sees the two items, but none the values on the properties are assigned
<17:00:38:006 USER_DEBUG [20]|DEBUG|####(EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null], EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null])
apex lightning-web-components
apex lightning-web-components
asked 2 days ago
Sebastian KesselSebastian Kessel
9,08862239
9,08862239
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
After 2 hours of struggling, and only 5 minutes after posting, here is the answer:
You have to add add get;set;
explicitly for this to work. Changing my inner class to the below fixed the problem.
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String name get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String email get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName get;set;
3
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
2 days ago
1
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
2 days ago
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use theMap<String, Object>
datatypes.
– tsalb
2 days ago
FYI, I made an answer here about dealing with complex datatypes without wrappers.
– tsalb
2 days ago
I used the Map approach a lot with aura, but for things as simple as what I needed I should’ve been able to just pass an object. Making me be explicit with getter and setters is counter intuitive
– Sebastian Kessel
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "459"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f257074%2flwc-and-complex-parameters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
After 2 hours of struggling, and only 5 minutes after posting, here is the answer:
You have to add add get;set;
explicitly for this to work. Changing my inner class to the below fixed the problem.
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String name get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String email get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName get;set;
3
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
2 days ago
1
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
2 days ago
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use theMap<String, Object>
datatypes.
– tsalb
2 days ago
FYI, I made an answer here about dealing with complex datatypes without wrappers.
– tsalb
2 days ago
I used the Map approach a lot with aura, but for things as simple as what I needed I should’ve been able to just pass an object. Making me be explicit with getter and setters is counter intuitive
– Sebastian Kessel
yesterday
add a comment |
After 2 hours of struggling, and only 5 minutes after posting, here is the answer:
You have to add add get;set;
explicitly for this to work. Changing my inner class to the below fixed the problem.
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String name get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String email get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName get;set;
3
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
2 days ago
1
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
2 days ago
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use theMap<String, Object>
datatypes.
– tsalb
2 days ago
FYI, I made an answer here about dealing with complex datatypes without wrappers.
– tsalb
2 days ago
I used the Map approach a lot with aura, but for things as simple as what I needed I should’ve been able to just pass an object. Making me be explicit with getter and setters is counter intuitive
– Sebastian Kessel
yesterday
add a comment |
After 2 hours of struggling, and only 5 minutes after posting, here is the answer:
You have to add add get;set;
explicitly for this to work. Changing my inner class to the below fixed the problem.
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String name get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String email get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName get;set;
After 2 hours of struggling, and only 5 minutes after posting, here is the answer:
You have to add add get;set;
explicitly for this to work. Changing my inner class to the below fixed the problem.
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String name get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String email get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName get;set;
answered 2 days ago
Sebastian KesselSebastian Kessel
9,08862239
9,08862239
3
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
2 days ago
1
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
2 days ago
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use theMap<String, Object>
datatypes.
– tsalb
2 days ago
FYI, I made an answer here about dealing with complex datatypes without wrappers.
– tsalb
2 days ago
I used the Map approach a lot with aura, but for things as simple as what I needed I should’ve been able to just pass an object. Making me be explicit with getter and setters is counter intuitive
– Sebastian Kessel
yesterday
add a comment |
3
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
2 days ago
1
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
2 days ago
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use theMap<String, Object>
datatypes.
– tsalb
2 days ago
FYI, I made an answer here about dealing with complex datatypes without wrappers.
– tsalb
2 days ago
I used the Map approach a lot with aura, but for things as simple as what I needed I should’ve been able to just pass an object. Making me be explicit with getter and setters is counter intuitive
– Sebastian Kessel
yesterday
3
3
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
2 days ago
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
2 days ago
1
1
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
2 days ago
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
2 days ago
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use the
Map<String, Object>
datatypes.– tsalb
2 days ago
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use the
Map<String, Object>
datatypes.– tsalb
2 days ago
FYI, I made an answer here about dealing with complex datatypes without wrappers.
– tsalb
2 days ago
FYI, I made an answer here about dealing with complex datatypes without wrappers.
– tsalb
2 days ago
I used the Map approach a lot with aura, but for things as simple as what I needed I should’ve been able to just pass an object. Making me be explicit with getter and setters is counter intuitive
– Sebastian Kessel
yesterday
I used the Map approach a lot with aura, but for things as simple as what I needed I should’ve been able to just pass an object. Making me be explicit with getter and setters is counter intuitive
– Sebastian Kessel
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f257074%2flwc-and-complex-parameters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
-apex, lightning-web-components