Where does the Shulchan Aruch quote an authority by name? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InParashat Metzora+HagadolPesach/PassoverWhat rules did Hamechaber set to himself before compiling the Shulchan Aruch?Shulchan Aruch UTF-8Anonymous glosses in the Shulchan AruchWhy is the Shulchan Aruch definitive?Siman 32, Kitzur Shulchan Aruch: UntranslatedLitvaks/Yeshivish and Shulchan AruchBuying a Shulchan AruchEnglish version of SHULCHAN ARUCHIs there any place where Shulchan Aruch rules with the Rosh against the Rif and Rambam?5th part of the shulchan aruchLearning to translate the Shulchan Aruch

How to type this arrow in math mode?

How to save as into a customized destination on macOS?

Why is the Constellation's nose gear so long?

Can you compress metal and what would be the consequences?

Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?

Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?

What is the closest word meaning "respect for time / mindful"

What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?

How to deal with fear of taking dependencies

Did 3000BC Egyptians use meteoric iron weapons?

What is the meaning of the verb "bear" in this context?

What is the accessibility of a package's `Private` context variables?

Can a flute soloist sit?

What tool would a Roman-age civilization have for the breaking of silver and other metals into dust?

Is there a symbol for a right arrow with a square in the middle?

How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure

Can a rogue use sneak attack with weapons that have the thrown property even if they are not thrown?

How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect

What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?

Where to refill my bottle in India?

Looking for Correct Greek Translation for Heraclitus

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky

Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?

Worn-tile Scrabble



Where does the Shulchan Aruch quote an authority by name?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Parashat Metzora+Hagadol
Pesach/PassoverWhat rules did Hamechaber set to himself before compiling the Shulchan Aruch?Shulchan Aruch UTF-8Anonymous glosses in the Shulchan AruchWhy is the Shulchan Aruch definitive?Siman 32, Kitzur Shulchan Aruch: UntranslatedLitvaks/Yeshivish and Shulchan AruchBuying a Shulchan AruchEnglish version of SHULCHAN ARUCHIs there any place where Shulchan Aruch rules with the Rosh against the Rif and Rambam?5th part of the shulchan aruchLearning to translate the Shulchan Aruch










2















Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.



In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):




הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן



The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].




Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?










share|improve this question
























  • I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

    – Dr. Shmuel
    2 days ago






  • 2





    There are dozens of such examples

    – Double AA
    2 days ago











  • In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?

    – Al Berko
    yesterday











  • Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…

    – Al Berko
    yesterday















2















Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.



In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):




הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן



The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].




Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?










share|improve this question
























  • I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

    – Dr. Shmuel
    2 days ago






  • 2





    There are dozens of such examples

    – Double AA
    2 days ago











  • In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?

    – Al Berko
    yesterday











  • Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…

    – Al Berko
    yesterday













2












2








2








Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.



In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):




הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן



The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].




Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?










share|improve this question
















Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.



In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):




הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן



The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].




Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?







shulchan-aruch






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









Al Berko

6,5371529




6,5371529










asked 2 days ago









DonielFDonielF

17.1k12690




17.1k12690












  • I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

    – Dr. Shmuel
    2 days ago






  • 2





    There are dozens of such examples

    – Double AA
    2 days ago











  • In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?

    – Al Berko
    yesterday











  • Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…

    – Al Berko
    yesterday

















  • I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

    – Dr. Shmuel
    2 days ago






  • 2





    There are dozens of such examples

    – Double AA
    2 days ago











  • In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?

    – Al Berko
    yesterday











  • Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…

    – Al Berko
    yesterday
















I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

– Dr. Shmuel
2 days ago





I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

– Dr. Shmuel
2 days ago




2




2





There are dozens of such examples

– Double AA
2 days ago





There are dozens of such examples

– Double AA
2 days ago













In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?

– Al Berko
yesterday





In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?

– Al Berko
yesterday













Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…

– Al Berko
yesterday





Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…

– Al Berko
yesterday










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















7














It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:



In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:




סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם




In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:




ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך




In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:




הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר




O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:




והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג




There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.






share|improve this answer






























    5














    Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:




    הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:







    share|improve this answer























    • This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

      – user6591
      2 days ago












    • First thing to pop on my mind

      – sam
      2 days ago











    • There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

      – Double AA
      2 days ago






    • 1





      @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

      – user6591
      2 days ago


















    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7














    It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:



    In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:




    סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם




    In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:




    ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך




    In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:




    הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר




    O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:




    והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג




    There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.






    share|improve this answer



























      7














      It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:



      In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:




      סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם




      In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:




      ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך




      In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:




      הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר




      O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:




      והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג




      There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.






      share|improve this answer

























        7












        7








        7







        It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:



        In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:




        סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם




        In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:




        ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך




        In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:




        הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר




        O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:




        והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג




        There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.






        share|improve this answer













        It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:



        In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:




        סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם




        In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:




        ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך




        In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:




        הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר




        O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:




        והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג




        There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 days ago









        AlexAlex

        23.5k157134




        23.5k157134





















            5














            Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:




            הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:







            share|improve this answer























            • This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

              – user6591
              2 days ago












            • First thing to pop on my mind

              – sam
              2 days ago











            • There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

              – Double AA
              2 days ago






            • 1





              @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

              – user6591
              2 days ago















            5














            Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:




            הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:







            share|improve this answer























            • This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

              – user6591
              2 days ago












            • First thing to pop on my mind

              – sam
              2 days ago











            • There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

              – Double AA
              2 days ago






            • 1





              @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

              – user6591
              2 days ago













            5












            5








            5







            Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:




            הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:







            share|improve this answer













            Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:




            הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:








            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 2 days ago









            user6591user6591

            25.8k12758




            25.8k12758












            • This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

              – user6591
              2 days ago












            • First thing to pop on my mind

              – sam
              2 days ago











            • There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

              – Double AA
              2 days ago






            • 1





              @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

              – user6591
              2 days ago

















            • This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

              – user6591
              2 days ago












            • First thing to pop on my mind

              – sam
              2 days ago











            • There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

              – Double AA
              2 days ago






            • 1





              @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

              – user6591
              2 days ago
















            This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

            – user6591
            2 days ago






            This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

            – user6591
            2 days ago














            First thing to pop on my mind

            – sam
            2 days ago





            First thing to pop on my mind

            – sam
            2 days ago













            There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

            – Double AA
            2 days ago





            There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

            – Double AA
            2 days ago




            1




            1





            @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

            – user6591
            2 days ago





            @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

            – user6591
            2 days ago



            -shulchan-aruch

            Popular posts from this blog

            Frič See also Navigation menuinternal link

            Identify plant with long narrow paired leaves and reddish stems Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?What is this plant with long sharp leaves? Is it a weed?What is this 3ft high, stalky plant, with mid sized narrow leaves?What is this young shrub with opposite ovate, crenate leaves and reddish stems?What is this plant with large broad serrated leaves?Identify this upright branching weed with long leaves and reddish stemsPlease help me identify this bulbous plant with long, broad leaves and white flowersWhat is this small annual with narrow gray/green leaves and rust colored daisy-type flowers?What is this chilli plant?Does anyone know what type of chilli plant this is?Help identify this plant

            fontconfig warning: “/etc/fonts/fonts.conf”, line 100: unknown “element blank” The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In“tar: unrecognized option --warning” during 'apt-get install'How to fix Fontconfig errorHow do I figure out which font file is chosen for a system generic font alias?Why are some apt-get-installed fonts being ignored by fc-list, xfontsel, etc?Reload settings in /etc/fonts/conf.dTaking 30 seconds longer to boot after upgrade from jessie to stretchHow to match multiple font names with a single <match> element?Adding a custom font to fontconfigRemoving fonts from fontconfig <match> resultsBroken fonts after upgrading Firefox ESR to latest Firefox