Is iptables string matching still supported? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inincoming ACCEPT all iptables rule still appearingstring matching not working in iptablesIPtables installation questionunderstand chains and tables in netfilter/iptablesIptables packet src ip not NATed in case of icmp reply and tcp ackiptables ERROR targetOUTPUT chain rules in iptablesiptable string matching to find application type / application layer protocoHow --set-mark option works on Netfilter (IPTABLES)?iptables blocking local traffic

Apparent duplicates between Haynes service instructions and MOT

Is this app Icon Browser Safe/Legit?

Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?

Why did Acorn's A3000 have red function keys?

Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?

FPGA - DIY Programming

Geography at the pixel level

Can you compress metal and what would be the consequences?

Am I thawing this London Broil safely?

Protecting Dualbooting Windows from dangerous code (like rm -rf)

Can a rogue use sneak attack with weapons that have the thrown property even if they are not thrown?

Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?

What is the accessibility of a package's `Private` context variables?

Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?

For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?

Can one be advised by a professor who is very far away?

Loose spokes after only a few rides

Did 3000BC Egyptians use meteoric iron weapons?

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

Why do we hear so much about the Trump administration deciding to impose and then remove tariffs?

Who coined the term "madman theory"?

What tool would a Roman-age civilization have for the breaking of silver and other metals into dust?

Delete all lines which don't have n characters before delimiter

Why is the Constellation's nose gear so long?



Is iptables string matching still supported?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inincoming ACCEPT all iptables rule still appearingstring matching not working in iptablesIPtables installation questionunderstand chains and tables in netfilter/iptablesIptables packet src ip not NATed in case of icmp reply and tcp ackiptables ERROR targetOUTPUT chain rules in iptablesiptable string matching to find application type / application layer protocoHow --set-mark option works on Netfilter (IPTABLES)?iptables blocking local traffic



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















I was reading the book Linux Firewalls - Attack Detection and Response (by M. Rash, No Starch Press, 1 Ed., Oct. 2007). In one of its chapter it discusses string matching using iptables. I was wondering:



  • if string matching is still supported by Linux kernel and
    iptables/Netfilter

  • if yes, can string matching search the encrypted payloads (e.g. HTTPS packets)?

I searched the net but most of the links are old, and the book itself is published in 2007.










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    I very much suspect that whatever it is you're doing, your iptables modules don't have the keys to any encrypted contents within the packets passing through them

    – ilkkachu
    Nov 14 '17 at 13:42

















2















I was reading the book Linux Firewalls - Attack Detection and Response (by M. Rash, No Starch Press, 1 Ed., Oct. 2007). In one of its chapter it discusses string matching using iptables. I was wondering:



  • if string matching is still supported by Linux kernel and
    iptables/Netfilter

  • if yes, can string matching search the encrypted payloads (e.g. HTTPS packets)?

I searched the net but most of the links are old, and the book itself is published in 2007.










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    I very much suspect that whatever it is you're doing, your iptables modules don't have the keys to any encrypted contents within the packets passing through them

    – ilkkachu
    Nov 14 '17 at 13:42













2












2








2








I was reading the book Linux Firewalls - Attack Detection and Response (by M. Rash, No Starch Press, 1 Ed., Oct. 2007). In one of its chapter it discusses string matching using iptables. I was wondering:



  • if string matching is still supported by Linux kernel and
    iptables/Netfilter

  • if yes, can string matching search the encrypted payloads (e.g. HTTPS packets)?

I searched the net but most of the links are old, and the book itself is published in 2007.










share|improve this question
















I was reading the book Linux Firewalls - Attack Detection and Response (by M. Rash, No Starch Press, 1 Ed., Oct. 2007). In one of its chapter it discusses string matching using iptables. I was wondering:



  • if string matching is still supported by Linux kernel and
    iptables/Netfilter

  • if yes, can string matching search the encrypted payloads (e.g. HTTPS packets)?

I searched the net but most of the links are old, and the book itself is published in 2007.







linux-kernel iptables netfilter






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 28 '18 at 19:18









U880D

417516




417516










asked Nov 14 '17 at 13:38









CoreyCorey

183




183







  • 1





    I very much suspect that whatever it is you're doing, your iptables modules don't have the keys to any encrypted contents within the packets passing through them

    – ilkkachu
    Nov 14 '17 at 13:42












  • 1





    I very much suspect that whatever it is you're doing, your iptables modules don't have the keys to any encrypted contents within the packets passing through them

    – ilkkachu
    Nov 14 '17 at 13:42







1




1





I very much suspect that whatever it is you're doing, your iptables modules don't have the keys to any encrypted contents within the packets passing through them

– ilkkachu
Nov 14 '17 at 13:42





I very much suspect that whatever it is you're doing, your iptables modules don't have the keys to any encrypted contents within the packets passing through them

– ilkkachu
Nov 14 '17 at 13:42










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4














Yes, the string extension is still supported (see also your local man iptables-extensions documentation). No, you can’t match against encrypted payloads — they’re still encrypted in the filtering layer...






share|improve this answer























  • Thank you, Stephen would tell more about filtering layer?

    – Corey
    Nov 15 '17 at 16:10











  • By “filtering layer” I just meant the part of the kernel which handles packet filtering (iptables etc.).

    – Stephen Kitt
    Nov 15 '17 at 19:04











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f404482%2fis-iptables-string-matching-still-supported%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4














Yes, the string extension is still supported (see also your local man iptables-extensions documentation). No, you can’t match against encrypted payloads — they’re still encrypted in the filtering layer...






share|improve this answer























  • Thank you, Stephen would tell more about filtering layer?

    – Corey
    Nov 15 '17 at 16:10











  • By “filtering layer” I just meant the part of the kernel which handles packet filtering (iptables etc.).

    – Stephen Kitt
    Nov 15 '17 at 19:04















4














Yes, the string extension is still supported (see also your local man iptables-extensions documentation). No, you can’t match against encrypted payloads — they’re still encrypted in the filtering layer...






share|improve this answer























  • Thank you, Stephen would tell more about filtering layer?

    – Corey
    Nov 15 '17 at 16:10











  • By “filtering layer” I just meant the part of the kernel which handles packet filtering (iptables etc.).

    – Stephen Kitt
    Nov 15 '17 at 19:04













4












4








4







Yes, the string extension is still supported (see also your local man iptables-extensions documentation). No, you can’t match against encrypted payloads — they’re still encrypted in the filtering layer...






share|improve this answer













Yes, the string extension is still supported (see also your local man iptables-extensions documentation). No, you can’t match against encrypted payloads — they’re still encrypted in the filtering layer...







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 14 '17 at 13:53









Stephen KittStephen Kitt

181k25414492




181k25414492












  • Thank you, Stephen would tell more about filtering layer?

    – Corey
    Nov 15 '17 at 16:10











  • By “filtering layer” I just meant the part of the kernel which handles packet filtering (iptables etc.).

    – Stephen Kitt
    Nov 15 '17 at 19:04

















  • Thank you, Stephen would tell more about filtering layer?

    – Corey
    Nov 15 '17 at 16:10











  • By “filtering layer” I just meant the part of the kernel which handles packet filtering (iptables etc.).

    – Stephen Kitt
    Nov 15 '17 at 19:04
















Thank you, Stephen would tell more about filtering layer?

– Corey
Nov 15 '17 at 16:10





Thank you, Stephen would tell more about filtering layer?

– Corey
Nov 15 '17 at 16:10













By “filtering layer” I just meant the part of the kernel which handles packet filtering (iptables etc.).

– Stephen Kitt
Nov 15 '17 at 19:04





By “filtering layer” I just meant the part of the kernel which handles packet filtering (iptables etc.).

– Stephen Kitt
Nov 15 '17 at 19:04

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f404482%2fis-iptables-string-matching-still-supported%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-iptables, linux-kernel, netfilter

Popular posts from this blog

2017 IndyCar Series Contents Series news Teams and drivers Schedule Season summary Footnotes References External links Navigation menu"INDYCAR: Initial 2018 bodywork concepts unveiled"the original"IndyCar confirms switch to Performance Friction brakes in 2017""AJ Foyt Racing will switch to Chevy"the original"Carlos Munoz, Conor Daly will drive for AJ Foyt Racing""Zach Veach's Indy 500 Debut Confirmed with Foyt""No mass exodus from Honda after Ganassi switch""Ex-F1 driver Sato joins Andretti Autosport for 2017 IndyCar season""IndyCar's Ryan Hunter-Reay, sponsor DHL paired through 2020""hhgregg and Andretti Autosport announce partnership for key races in 2016""INDYCAR: Rossi re-signs with Andretti"the original"McLaren Formula 1 - Fernando Alonso to race at Indy 500 with McLaren, Honda and Andretti Autosport""Shank will finally take part in Indy 500 with Harvey, Andretti | MotorSportsTalk""Andretti adds Jack Harvey to Indy 500 field""Ganassi switches to Honda power for 2017""INDYCAR: Chilton returns to Ganassi"the original"IndyCar silly season: Who's going where in 2017?""INDYCAR: Kanaan, NTT Data return to Ganassi"the original"Kimball to remain at Ganassi for 2017""Coyne confirms Bourdais for 2017 IndyCar season""Davison to sub for Bourdais in Indy 500"the original"Gutierrez confirmed for Detroit IndyCar debut""Gutierrez returns with Coyne for rest of 2017 season""Vautier to drive for Coyne at Texas"the original"INDYCAR: Coyne confirms Jones for 2017"the original"Pippa Mann returns to Coyne for Indy 500""Karam, Dreyer & Reinbold teaming up again for Indianapolis 500""Pigot to return to Ed Carpenter Racing""Hildebrand confirmed as full-time Ed Carpenter driver""Veach to replace injured Hildebrand at Barber"the originalNew Team Harding Racing Enters Chaves for 101st Indianapolis 500"Juncos Racing Announces Entry in 101st Running of the Indianapolis 500 :: Juncos Racing""Juncos confirms Pigot for Indy 500""Saavedra confirmed in Juncos' second 500 entry"the original"Lazier confirms Indy 500 run after son's USF2000 debut"the original"Claman DeMelo to race for RLLR at Sonoma"the original"Rahal signs Servia and ace engineer for 2017""IndyCar: Aleshin returns with Schmidt"the original"Aleshin replaced by Saavedra for Toronto""Jack Harvey will pilot SPM No. 7 car at Watkins Glen, Sonoma""Jay Howard confirmed in Tony Stewart's supported SPM Indy entry""INDYCAR: Newgarden to wave the flag at Penske"the original"Pagenaud opts for No. 1 in 2017"the original"Penske confirms Newgarden for 2017""Montoya to stay with Team Penske in 2017""Target leaving IndyCar after 27 seasons with Chip Ganassi""Cavin: IndyCar could see complete driver/team shakeup in 2017""End of the road for KV Racing?""KV Racing confirms closure, equipment sold to Juncos""Juncos confirms IndyCar Series entry"the original"Juncos readies IndyCar program, aims for '17 500"the original"Harding Racing to add Texas, Pocono to schedule"the original"Sato signs with Andretti Autosport for 2017""INDYCAR: Aleshin in Doubt at SPM"the original"Long Beach notebook: JR Hildebrand breaks hand""Hildebrand cleared to return at Phoenix"the original"Bourdais to undergo surgery on multiple fractures""Aleshin loses Schmidt Peterson IndyCar ride""Saavedra in at SPM for Pocono, Gateway"the original"Bourdais to make return at Gateway"the original"The IndyCar Grand Prix no longer is sponsored by Angie's List""2017 IndyCar Series rulebook""2017 Verizon IndyCar Series Official Rulebook"Official websiteeeeee

Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god existsWord for having a definite opinion while simultaneously withholding judgment?What's the opposite of “newcomer? Is ”veteran" OK?What do you call an “atheist” who might believe in an afterlife?What's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Word for someone who dismisses contrary opinions as irrational?Somone who thinks they are overly special/out of the ordinaryIs there a word, phrase or idiom for “a person who is incapable of thinking about the future”?The belief that a god is human-likeA word for a non-famous person/thing you have heard a lot aboutAdjective for a person who enjoys taking care of their appearance

Can I sign legal documents with a smiley face?Do Legal Documents Require Signing In Standard Pen Colors?Is it possible to legally prohibit someone from linking to specific pages on your website?Do scans of signed documents have the same legal power as the original document?What can I do if I signed an excessively restrictive contract?Can other party sneak in new contract terms via termination notice?How to prove that someone forged my signature on a contract that I was not aware of?In Australia, Is it legal to sign a document as somebody else?making a contract that includes video licenceLease dispute, over email and text messageIf you must include all of the natural language prose in a legal document, or if it can be abstracted outE-signing: legal ramifications of “identifying” a person