Would this custom Sorcerer variant that can only learn any verbal-component-only spell be unbalanced?Would this custom prestige class be balanced? (arcane battlesmith that cannot cast)Can Magic Mouth be used to speak the verbal component of a spell?At level up, can a sorcerer learn spells of a level granted by slots he has from any class?How Best to Improve Concentration Saves (or avoid the check all together)?How unbalanced would a feat that allowed access to other spell lists be?Is this custom darkness spell unbalanced?Can I learn sigil sequences for teleportation circles before learning a spell that can use them?What are the impacts of permitting casters to concentrate on 2 spells?Can a Spell Focus or Component Pouch be used with a spell that has costless consumed components?Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

The use of multiple foreign keys on same column in SQL Server

Can Medicine checks be used, with decent rolls, to completely mitigate the risk of death from ongoing damage?

"which" command doesn't work / path of Safari?

Why does apt-get install python3 with a trailing hyphen remove a lot of packages?

Why was the small council so happy for Tyrion to become the Master of Coin?

When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?

Can you lasso down a wizard who is using the Levitate spell?

declaring a variable twice in IIFE

Why don't electron-positron collisions release infinite energy?

Why are 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there are 300k+ births a month?

Non-Jewish family in an Orthodox Jewish Wedding

Is there really no realistic way for a skeleton monster to move around without magic?

Finding files for which a command fails

What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?

Could a US political party gain complete control over the government by removing checks & balances?

Draw simple lines in Inkscape

Why is "Reports" in sentence down without "The"

How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?

I see my dog run

How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?

Prevent a directory in /tmp from being deleted

How can the DM most effectively choose 1 out of an odd number of players to be targeted by an attack or effect?

Do airline pilots ever risk not hearing communication directed to them specifically, from traffic controllers?



Would this custom Sorcerer variant that can only learn any verbal-component-only spell be unbalanced?


Would this custom prestige class be balanced? (arcane battlesmith that cannot cast)Can Magic Mouth be used to speak the verbal component of a spell?At level up, can a sorcerer learn spells of a level granted by slots he has from any class?How Best to Improve Concentration Saves (or avoid the check all together)?How unbalanced would a feat that allowed access to other spell lists be?Is this custom darkness spell unbalanced?Can I learn sigil sequences for teleportation circles before learning a spell that can use them?What are the impacts of permitting casters to concentrate on 2 spells?Can a Spell Focus or Component Pouch be used with a spell that has costless consumed components?Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








7












$begingroup$


I recently started reading through the Shannara books by Terry Brooks, and it got me thinking about how the notion of the wishsong would translate into a system like D&D.



My (very) rough idea right now is a sub-class of sorcerer who can learn spells from any school or class as long as that spell uses only verbal components.



I found a pretty good tool on a site that let me filter to get a list of all verbal-only spells. Level-wise, the list looks reasonably well-distributed and has a decent mix of combat and non-combat spells. That said, I don't have an encyclopedic knowledge of D&D spells and my experiences with the Sorcerer class is limited.



Would these spells be seriously unbalanced when combined with the class features of a sorcerer?



To be clear, taken as a whole, this list will probably still be too limited and will require adding in some additional spells to round it out later. My primary concern is identifying any game-breaking outliers before I start making further changes.



Cantrips: Lightning Lure, Sword Burst, Thaumaturgy, Vicious Mockery
Lvl 1: Cause Fear, Command, Compelled Duel, Dissonant Whispers, Ensnaring Strike, Faerie Fire, Hail of Thorns, Healing Word, Hunter's Mark, Searing Smite, Thunderous Smite, Wrathful Smite, Zephyr Strike
Lvl 2: Blindness/Deafness, Blur, Branding Smite, Earthbind, Knock, Misty Step,
Prayer of Healing, Warding Wind
Lvl 3 Aura of Vitality, Blinding Smite, Crusader's Mantle, Mass Healing Word, Thunder Step
Lvl 4: Aura of Life, Aura of Purity, Dimension Door, Guardian of Faith, Guardian of Nature, Staggering Smite
Lvl 5: Banishing Smite, Circle of Power, Contact Other Plane, Destructive Wave, Far Step, Geas, Immolation
Lvl 6: Otto's Irresistible Dance, Scatter, Word of Recall
Lvl 7: Divine Word, Power Word Pain, Teleport,
Lvl 8: Glibness, Power Word Stun
Lvl 9: Power Word Kill, Time Stop, Wish










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @ Gandalfmeansme ONLY spells from this list. If it requires a material or somatic component it is not allowed.
    $endgroup$
    – pbuchheit
    Mar 27 at 16:25






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The site that you link to contains a lot of pirated material (material that they do not have a license to show). So, I have removed it from your question since we have a policy of not linking to sites that host such material.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Mar 27 at 16:31







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Rubiksmoose: The donjon site doesn't really include non-SRD content, as far as I know; it doesn't have any of the spell descriptions, so it's only the kind of general info about spells that's visible on D&D Beyond without owning the content.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Mar 28 at 1:24


















7












$begingroup$


I recently started reading through the Shannara books by Terry Brooks, and it got me thinking about how the notion of the wishsong would translate into a system like D&D.



My (very) rough idea right now is a sub-class of sorcerer who can learn spells from any school or class as long as that spell uses only verbal components.



I found a pretty good tool on a site that let me filter to get a list of all verbal-only spells. Level-wise, the list looks reasonably well-distributed and has a decent mix of combat and non-combat spells. That said, I don't have an encyclopedic knowledge of D&D spells and my experiences with the Sorcerer class is limited.



Would these spells be seriously unbalanced when combined with the class features of a sorcerer?



To be clear, taken as a whole, this list will probably still be too limited and will require adding in some additional spells to round it out later. My primary concern is identifying any game-breaking outliers before I start making further changes.



Cantrips: Lightning Lure, Sword Burst, Thaumaturgy, Vicious Mockery
Lvl 1: Cause Fear, Command, Compelled Duel, Dissonant Whispers, Ensnaring Strike, Faerie Fire, Hail of Thorns, Healing Word, Hunter's Mark, Searing Smite, Thunderous Smite, Wrathful Smite, Zephyr Strike
Lvl 2: Blindness/Deafness, Blur, Branding Smite, Earthbind, Knock, Misty Step,
Prayer of Healing, Warding Wind
Lvl 3 Aura of Vitality, Blinding Smite, Crusader's Mantle, Mass Healing Word, Thunder Step
Lvl 4: Aura of Life, Aura of Purity, Dimension Door, Guardian of Faith, Guardian of Nature, Staggering Smite
Lvl 5: Banishing Smite, Circle of Power, Contact Other Plane, Destructive Wave, Far Step, Geas, Immolation
Lvl 6: Otto's Irresistible Dance, Scatter, Word of Recall
Lvl 7: Divine Word, Power Word Pain, Teleport,
Lvl 8: Glibness, Power Word Stun
Lvl 9: Power Word Kill, Time Stop, Wish










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @ Gandalfmeansme ONLY spells from this list. If it requires a material or somatic component it is not allowed.
    $endgroup$
    – pbuchheit
    Mar 27 at 16:25






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The site that you link to contains a lot of pirated material (material that they do not have a license to show). So, I have removed it from your question since we have a policy of not linking to sites that host such material.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Mar 27 at 16:31







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Rubiksmoose: The donjon site doesn't really include non-SRD content, as far as I know; it doesn't have any of the spell descriptions, so it's only the kind of general info about spells that's visible on D&D Beyond without owning the content.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Mar 28 at 1:24














7












7








7





$begingroup$


I recently started reading through the Shannara books by Terry Brooks, and it got me thinking about how the notion of the wishsong would translate into a system like D&D.



My (very) rough idea right now is a sub-class of sorcerer who can learn spells from any school or class as long as that spell uses only verbal components.



I found a pretty good tool on a site that let me filter to get a list of all verbal-only spells. Level-wise, the list looks reasonably well-distributed and has a decent mix of combat and non-combat spells. That said, I don't have an encyclopedic knowledge of D&D spells and my experiences with the Sorcerer class is limited.



Would these spells be seriously unbalanced when combined with the class features of a sorcerer?



To be clear, taken as a whole, this list will probably still be too limited and will require adding in some additional spells to round it out later. My primary concern is identifying any game-breaking outliers before I start making further changes.



Cantrips: Lightning Lure, Sword Burst, Thaumaturgy, Vicious Mockery
Lvl 1: Cause Fear, Command, Compelled Duel, Dissonant Whispers, Ensnaring Strike, Faerie Fire, Hail of Thorns, Healing Word, Hunter's Mark, Searing Smite, Thunderous Smite, Wrathful Smite, Zephyr Strike
Lvl 2: Blindness/Deafness, Blur, Branding Smite, Earthbind, Knock, Misty Step,
Prayer of Healing, Warding Wind
Lvl 3 Aura of Vitality, Blinding Smite, Crusader's Mantle, Mass Healing Word, Thunder Step
Lvl 4: Aura of Life, Aura of Purity, Dimension Door, Guardian of Faith, Guardian of Nature, Staggering Smite
Lvl 5: Banishing Smite, Circle of Power, Contact Other Plane, Destructive Wave, Far Step, Geas, Immolation
Lvl 6: Otto's Irresistible Dance, Scatter, Word of Recall
Lvl 7: Divine Word, Power Word Pain, Teleport,
Lvl 8: Glibness, Power Word Stun
Lvl 9: Power Word Kill, Time Stop, Wish










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I recently started reading through the Shannara books by Terry Brooks, and it got me thinking about how the notion of the wishsong would translate into a system like D&D.



My (very) rough idea right now is a sub-class of sorcerer who can learn spells from any school or class as long as that spell uses only verbal components.



I found a pretty good tool on a site that let me filter to get a list of all verbal-only spells. Level-wise, the list looks reasonably well-distributed and has a decent mix of combat and non-combat spells. That said, I don't have an encyclopedic knowledge of D&D spells and my experiences with the Sorcerer class is limited.



Would these spells be seriously unbalanced when combined with the class features of a sorcerer?



To be clear, taken as a whole, this list will probably still be too limited and will require adding in some additional spells to round it out later. My primary concern is identifying any game-breaking outliers before I start making further changes.



Cantrips: Lightning Lure, Sword Burst, Thaumaturgy, Vicious Mockery
Lvl 1: Cause Fear, Command, Compelled Duel, Dissonant Whispers, Ensnaring Strike, Faerie Fire, Hail of Thorns, Healing Word, Hunter's Mark, Searing Smite, Thunderous Smite, Wrathful Smite, Zephyr Strike
Lvl 2: Blindness/Deafness, Blur, Branding Smite, Earthbind, Knock, Misty Step,
Prayer of Healing, Warding Wind
Lvl 3 Aura of Vitality, Blinding Smite, Crusader's Mantle, Mass Healing Word, Thunder Step
Lvl 4: Aura of Life, Aura of Purity, Dimension Door, Guardian of Faith, Guardian of Nature, Staggering Smite
Lvl 5: Banishing Smite, Circle of Power, Contact Other Plane, Destructive Wave, Far Step, Geas, Immolation
Lvl 6: Otto's Irresistible Dance, Scatter, Word of Recall
Lvl 7: Divine Word, Power Word Pain, Teleport,
Lvl 8: Glibness, Power Word Stun
Lvl 9: Power Word Kill, Time Stop, Wish







dnd-5e homebrew balance sorcerer spell-components






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 28 at 1:21









V2Blast

26.2k590160




26.2k590160










asked Mar 27 at 15:54









pbuchheitpbuchheit

25128




25128







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @ Gandalfmeansme ONLY spells from this list. If it requires a material or somatic component it is not allowed.
    $endgroup$
    – pbuchheit
    Mar 27 at 16:25






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The site that you link to contains a lot of pirated material (material that they do not have a license to show). So, I have removed it from your question since we have a policy of not linking to sites that host such material.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Mar 27 at 16:31







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Rubiksmoose: The donjon site doesn't really include non-SRD content, as far as I know; it doesn't have any of the spell descriptions, so it's only the kind of general info about spells that's visible on D&D Beyond without owning the content.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Mar 28 at 1:24













  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @ Gandalfmeansme ONLY spells from this list. If it requires a material or somatic component it is not allowed.
    $endgroup$
    – pbuchheit
    Mar 27 at 16:25






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The site that you link to contains a lot of pirated material (material that they do not have a license to show). So, I have removed it from your question since we have a policy of not linking to sites that host such material.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Mar 27 at 16:31







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Rubiksmoose: The donjon site doesn't really include non-SRD content, as far as I know; it doesn't have any of the spell descriptions, so it's only the kind of general info about spells that's visible on D&D Beyond without owning the content.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Mar 28 at 1:24








4




4




$begingroup$
@ Gandalfmeansme ONLY spells from this list. If it requires a material or somatic component it is not allowed.
$endgroup$
– pbuchheit
Mar 27 at 16:25




$begingroup$
@ Gandalfmeansme ONLY spells from this list. If it requires a material or somatic component it is not allowed.
$endgroup$
– pbuchheit
Mar 27 at 16:25




2




2




$begingroup$
The site that you link to contains a lot of pirated material (material that they do not have a license to show). So, I have removed it from your question since we have a policy of not linking to sites that host such material.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
Mar 27 at 16:31





$begingroup$
The site that you link to contains a lot of pirated material (material that they do not have a license to show). So, I have removed it from your question since we have a policy of not linking to sites that host such material.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
Mar 27 at 16:31





2




2




$begingroup$
@Rubiksmoose: The donjon site doesn't really include non-SRD content, as far as I know; it doesn't have any of the spell descriptions, so it's only the kind of general info about spells that's visible on D&D Beyond without owning the content.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Mar 28 at 1:24





$begingroup$
@Rubiksmoose: The donjon site doesn't really include non-SRD content, as far as I know; it doesn't have any of the spell descriptions, so it's only the kind of general info about spells that's visible on D&D Beyond without owning the content.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Mar 28 at 1:24











5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















10












$begingroup$

This is a significant weakness for the subclass



This list of spells is extremely limited. If you subtract out the sorcerer spells from the new list and compare it to the default sorcerer list, you are trading...



  • 26 cantrips for 2 new ones

  • 25 1st-level spells for 13 new ones

  • 28 2nd-level spells for 2 new ones

  • 25 3rd-level spells for 4 new ones

  • 13 4th-level spells for 5 new ones

  • 16 5th-level spells for 5 new ones

  • 15 6th-level spells for 2 new ones

  • 9 7th-level spells for 1 new one

  • 5 8th-level spells for 1 new one

  • 6 9th level spells for 0 new ones

Your spell selection will be extremely limited as a result of this feature. There would have to be sizable compensation in the rest of the subclass features to account for this drastic reduction in versatility.



Another problem is that over the course of a sorcerer's adventuring life, they gain 6 cantrips while your subclass only has access to 4. I'm not sure how you would resolve this, but the subclass should probably account for this disparity.



Paladin spells



One possible redeeming factor is the availability of a handful of high-level paladin spells such as staggering smite and banishing smite. These spells are usually only available to paladins of level 13 (for the 4th level ones) and level 17 (for the 5th level ones), but would come online much sooner for your subclass. Usually the only way to get access to these spells earlier is through the bard's Magical Secrets feature.



Bards will get access to at most six of these over the course of their adventuring career (but reasonably only two as the other four could be used for much more powerful options at higher levels), while your sorcerer subclass gets access to all of them. Overall though, I doubt this makes up for the loss of so many spell options.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    6












    $begingroup$

    One issue you're likely to run into with this design, is that the list of spells with only verbal components is extremely limited. For example, there are two cantrips in the Player's Handbook with only verbal components, Xanathar's Guide to Everything has none, and the Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide has two more.



    This would be problematic for a sorcerer, in that they will never be able to have more cantrips than they start with at level 1 (4 cantrips).



    Outside of cantrips, the total list of spells is still very small and it only gets worse at higher level (there are a total of 11 spells level 6-9 that only have verbal components).



    As noted below, this is basically a weaker version of a Divine Soul Sorcerer, but with access to several Ranger and Paladin exclusive spells. Those classes are half casters, so your sorcerer gets access to spells that would usually only be available to higher level spells. That said, none of them are particularly powerful (Swiftquiver, for example, isn't present).



    Overall, I'd say this class is a less powerful version of arguably the best Sorcerer subclass. The sorcerer is generally acknowledged to be underpowered, so I'd guess this would be relatively underpowered.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      are you saying that it can't be overpowered due to that limitation?
      $endgroup$
      – KorvinStarmast
      Mar 27 at 16:24






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Or are you saying that is is underpowered. In short, what is your conclusion?
      $endgroup$
      – David Coffron
      Mar 27 at 16:26










    • $begingroup$
      FWIW, as I review the spell list it looks like a variation on the Divine Soul sorc.
      $endgroup$
      – KorvinStarmast
      Mar 27 at 16:27






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @András sounds like part of answer; I was asking a clarifying question of the OP.
      $endgroup$
      – David Coffron
      Mar 27 at 16:28






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @pbuchheit I would carefully evaluate the paladin exclusive spells, especially the lvl 4 and 5 ones. Those are usually only available to high level characters, due to paladins being half casters.
      $endgroup$
      – Matt Rick
      Mar 27 at 16:43


















    2












    $begingroup$

    It is still weak even if you add these above the usual Sorcerer list



    Divine Soul Sorcerers can learn spells from the Sorcerer and Cleric list.

    They also get 2d4 per short rest to an attack or save, and empowered healing and wings and half their hit points for a bonus action.



    I am comparing to the arguably best Sorcerer origin, but as long as it is weaker than the current best, it cannot be overpowered.



    My recommendation is to use Divine Soul as a template, so add these spells, and some other features for levels 1, 6, 14 and 18.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$




















      1












      $begingroup$

      The spells are deeply restricted, but it doesn't have to be this stark.



      The size of the cantrip list alone is an issue. The fact that many of these effects are not amazing for the sorcerer is another. Many of them, for example, strognly encourage melee combat - not an area that the sorceror particularly shines in. By contrast, you're missing almost all of the blasting spells that are the default sorceror's bread and butter.



      On the other hand, you do have class features to play with. One of the more obvious solutions for this one would be to have a class feature that lets you skip the material components (within a certain budget) and the somatic components, but removes access to the Subtle Spell metamagic or any other form of removing access to verbal components.



      Of course, you might still want to do some surgery to the spell list after this. In particular, the powers described for the various incarnations of the elfsong aren't necessarily well-aligned with either the Sorceror list or the Verbal-only list. It's going to have to be up to you to decide how far to take that, though.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$




















        1












        $begingroup$

        Nothing Gamebreaking, but a Problematic Subclass



        The good news is there really doesn't seem to be any spells that are overpowered (well, Wish, but Sorcerers get that anyway), so the answer your primary stated question/concern is a simple "no, none of these spells will break your game". Lets move on to the trouble:



        Weak, Though This May Not Bother You Thematically



        As others have discussed at length, this subclass is getting a very limited selection of spells versus other full spell-casters. Perhaps a larger issue, however, is that they simply don't have a viable list of spells at certain levels. I think a sorcerer without stronger attack cantrips is probably going to be a pretty useless party member for the first couple levels (when they have few spell slots) compared to any other subclass of any class. Meanwhile in the top two tiers they get very few spells at all, which means that spell-wise they will start to become a comparatively even weaker subclass after level ten.



        However this is a subclass built strongly around a theme, and thematic strength can offset mechanical weakness to people who care enough about theme. Still having mechanics that bear out the promise of the theme is important even to many people who prefer role-play to roll-play.



        Stronger for a Fighter-Caster Subclass or with Some Special Ability to Use Related Spells. But This May Bother You Thematically



        The spells they gain are disproportionately Paladin and Ranger spells, and many require a melee attack. This would suggest that if their subclass features involved weapons, armor, an extra attack at level six (like valor bards, sword bards and bladesingers), something to give them semi-competitive hit points, and/or other features to make them useful in non-magical combat then this might be a competitive subclass.



        If that is completely off theme (I which suspect it is for a "wishsong" theme) then perhaps they need some other special ability to make a more sorcerer appropriate at-will attack with which various smites and such can be used effectively. It just seems like without some sort of extra ability to take full advantage of smites, hunters mark, etc they are trading way too much for things they can't even get much use from and which probably don't bear out the theme.



        What do You Want Theme-wise?



        It seems like the real question is not whether these added spells are gamebreaking. Unless there is a particular exploit with metamagic it is hard to see how any RAW spells could be given to a Sorcerer and really "break" the game and most the usual suspects are spells that Sorcerers, or at least Divine Soul Sorcerers, already get. It seems like the real question, and the thing you will have to evaluate the specific spells being given for, is whether they suit the theme you are trying to achieve.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "122"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144038%2fwould-this-custom-sorcerer-variant-that-can-only-learn-any-verbal-component-only%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes








          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          10












          $begingroup$

          This is a significant weakness for the subclass



          This list of spells is extremely limited. If you subtract out the sorcerer spells from the new list and compare it to the default sorcerer list, you are trading...



          • 26 cantrips for 2 new ones

          • 25 1st-level spells for 13 new ones

          • 28 2nd-level spells for 2 new ones

          • 25 3rd-level spells for 4 new ones

          • 13 4th-level spells for 5 new ones

          • 16 5th-level spells for 5 new ones

          • 15 6th-level spells for 2 new ones

          • 9 7th-level spells for 1 new one

          • 5 8th-level spells for 1 new one

          • 6 9th level spells for 0 new ones

          Your spell selection will be extremely limited as a result of this feature. There would have to be sizable compensation in the rest of the subclass features to account for this drastic reduction in versatility.



          Another problem is that over the course of a sorcerer's adventuring life, they gain 6 cantrips while your subclass only has access to 4. I'm not sure how you would resolve this, but the subclass should probably account for this disparity.



          Paladin spells



          One possible redeeming factor is the availability of a handful of high-level paladin spells such as staggering smite and banishing smite. These spells are usually only available to paladins of level 13 (for the 4th level ones) and level 17 (for the 5th level ones), but would come online much sooner for your subclass. Usually the only way to get access to these spells earlier is through the bard's Magical Secrets feature.



          Bards will get access to at most six of these over the course of their adventuring career (but reasonably only two as the other four could be used for much more powerful options at higher levels), while your sorcerer subclass gets access to all of them. Overall though, I doubt this makes up for the loss of so many spell options.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$

















            10












            $begingroup$

            This is a significant weakness for the subclass



            This list of spells is extremely limited. If you subtract out the sorcerer spells from the new list and compare it to the default sorcerer list, you are trading...



            • 26 cantrips for 2 new ones

            • 25 1st-level spells for 13 new ones

            • 28 2nd-level spells for 2 new ones

            • 25 3rd-level spells for 4 new ones

            • 13 4th-level spells for 5 new ones

            • 16 5th-level spells for 5 new ones

            • 15 6th-level spells for 2 new ones

            • 9 7th-level spells for 1 new one

            • 5 8th-level spells for 1 new one

            • 6 9th level spells for 0 new ones

            Your spell selection will be extremely limited as a result of this feature. There would have to be sizable compensation in the rest of the subclass features to account for this drastic reduction in versatility.



            Another problem is that over the course of a sorcerer's adventuring life, they gain 6 cantrips while your subclass only has access to 4. I'm not sure how you would resolve this, but the subclass should probably account for this disparity.



            Paladin spells



            One possible redeeming factor is the availability of a handful of high-level paladin spells such as staggering smite and banishing smite. These spells are usually only available to paladins of level 13 (for the 4th level ones) and level 17 (for the 5th level ones), but would come online much sooner for your subclass. Usually the only way to get access to these spells earlier is through the bard's Magical Secrets feature.



            Bards will get access to at most six of these over the course of their adventuring career (but reasonably only two as the other four could be used for much more powerful options at higher levels), while your sorcerer subclass gets access to all of them. Overall though, I doubt this makes up for the loss of so many spell options.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$















              10












              10








              10





              $begingroup$

              This is a significant weakness for the subclass



              This list of spells is extremely limited. If you subtract out the sorcerer spells from the new list and compare it to the default sorcerer list, you are trading...



              • 26 cantrips for 2 new ones

              • 25 1st-level spells for 13 new ones

              • 28 2nd-level spells for 2 new ones

              • 25 3rd-level spells for 4 new ones

              • 13 4th-level spells for 5 new ones

              • 16 5th-level spells for 5 new ones

              • 15 6th-level spells for 2 new ones

              • 9 7th-level spells for 1 new one

              • 5 8th-level spells for 1 new one

              • 6 9th level spells for 0 new ones

              Your spell selection will be extremely limited as a result of this feature. There would have to be sizable compensation in the rest of the subclass features to account for this drastic reduction in versatility.



              Another problem is that over the course of a sorcerer's adventuring life, they gain 6 cantrips while your subclass only has access to 4. I'm not sure how you would resolve this, but the subclass should probably account for this disparity.



              Paladin spells



              One possible redeeming factor is the availability of a handful of high-level paladin spells such as staggering smite and banishing smite. These spells are usually only available to paladins of level 13 (for the 4th level ones) and level 17 (for the 5th level ones), but would come online much sooner for your subclass. Usually the only way to get access to these spells earlier is through the bard's Magical Secrets feature.



              Bards will get access to at most six of these over the course of their adventuring career (but reasonably only two as the other four could be used for much more powerful options at higher levels), while your sorcerer subclass gets access to all of them. Overall though, I doubt this makes up for the loss of so many spell options.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              This is a significant weakness for the subclass



              This list of spells is extremely limited. If you subtract out the sorcerer spells from the new list and compare it to the default sorcerer list, you are trading...



              • 26 cantrips for 2 new ones

              • 25 1st-level spells for 13 new ones

              • 28 2nd-level spells for 2 new ones

              • 25 3rd-level spells for 4 new ones

              • 13 4th-level spells for 5 new ones

              • 16 5th-level spells for 5 new ones

              • 15 6th-level spells for 2 new ones

              • 9 7th-level spells for 1 new one

              • 5 8th-level spells for 1 new one

              • 6 9th level spells for 0 new ones

              Your spell selection will be extremely limited as a result of this feature. There would have to be sizable compensation in the rest of the subclass features to account for this drastic reduction in versatility.



              Another problem is that over the course of a sorcerer's adventuring life, they gain 6 cantrips while your subclass only has access to 4. I'm not sure how you would resolve this, but the subclass should probably account for this disparity.



              Paladin spells



              One possible redeeming factor is the availability of a handful of high-level paladin spells such as staggering smite and banishing smite. These spells are usually only available to paladins of level 13 (for the 4th level ones) and level 17 (for the 5th level ones), but would come online much sooner for your subclass. Usually the only way to get access to these spells earlier is through the bard's Magical Secrets feature.



              Bards will get access to at most six of these over the course of their adventuring career (but reasonably only two as the other four could be used for much more powerful options at higher levels), while your sorcerer subclass gets access to all of them. Overall though, I doubt this makes up for the loss of so many spell options.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Mar 27 at 16:55

























              answered Mar 27 at 16:45









              David CoffronDavid Coffron

              39.5k3135280




              39.5k3135280























                  6












                  $begingroup$

                  One issue you're likely to run into with this design, is that the list of spells with only verbal components is extremely limited. For example, there are two cantrips in the Player's Handbook with only verbal components, Xanathar's Guide to Everything has none, and the Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide has two more.



                  This would be problematic for a sorcerer, in that they will never be able to have more cantrips than they start with at level 1 (4 cantrips).



                  Outside of cantrips, the total list of spells is still very small and it only gets worse at higher level (there are a total of 11 spells level 6-9 that only have verbal components).



                  As noted below, this is basically a weaker version of a Divine Soul Sorcerer, but with access to several Ranger and Paladin exclusive spells. Those classes are half casters, so your sorcerer gets access to spells that would usually only be available to higher level spells. That said, none of them are particularly powerful (Swiftquiver, for example, isn't present).



                  Overall, I'd say this class is a less powerful version of arguably the best Sorcerer subclass. The sorcerer is generally acknowledged to be underpowered, so I'd guess this would be relatively underpowered.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$












                  • $begingroup$
                    are you saying that it can't be overpowered due to that limitation?
                    $endgroup$
                    – KorvinStarmast
                    Mar 27 at 16:24






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    Or are you saying that is is underpowered. In short, what is your conclusion?
                    $endgroup$
                    – David Coffron
                    Mar 27 at 16:26










                  • $begingroup$
                    FWIW, as I review the spell list it looks like a variation on the Divine Soul sorc.
                    $endgroup$
                    – KorvinStarmast
                    Mar 27 at 16:27






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @András sounds like part of answer; I was asking a clarifying question of the OP.
                    $endgroup$
                    – David Coffron
                    Mar 27 at 16:28






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    @pbuchheit I would carefully evaluate the paladin exclusive spells, especially the lvl 4 and 5 ones. Those are usually only available to high level characters, due to paladins being half casters.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Matt Rick
                    Mar 27 at 16:43















                  6












                  $begingroup$

                  One issue you're likely to run into with this design, is that the list of spells with only verbal components is extremely limited. For example, there are two cantrips in the Player's Handbook with only verbal components, Xanathar's Guide to Everything has none, and the Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide has two more.



                  This would be problematic for a sorcerer, in that they will never be able to have more cantrips than they start with at level 1 (4 cantrips).



                  Outside of cantrips, the total list of spells is still very small and it only gets worse at higher level (there are a total of 11 spells level 6-9 that only have verbal components).



                  As noted below, this is basically a weaker version of a Divine Soul Sorcerer, but with access to several Ranger and Paladin exclusive spells. Those classes are half casters, so your sorcerer gets access to spells that would usually only be available to higher level spells. That said, none of them are particularly powerful (Swiftquiver, for example, isn't present).



                  Overall, I'd say this class is a less powerful version of arguably the best Sorcerer subclass. The sorcerer is generally acknowledged to be underpowered, so I'd guess this would be relatively underpowered.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$












                  • $begingroup$
                    are you saying that it can't be overpowered due to that limitation?
                    $endgroup$
                    – KorvinStarmast
                    Mar 27 at 16:24






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    Or are you saying that is is underpowered. In short, what is your conclusion?
                    $endgroup$
                    – David Coffron
                    Mar 27 at 16:26










                  • $begingroup$
                    FWIW, as I review the spell list it looks like a variation on the Divine Soul sorc.
                    $endgroup$
                    – KorvinStarmast
                    Mar 27 at 16:27






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @András sounds like part of answer; I was asking a clarifying question of the OP.
                    $endgroup$
                    – David Coffron
                    Mar 27 at 16:28






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    @pbuchheit I would carefully evaluate the paladin exclusive spells, especially the lvl 4 and 5 ones. Those are usually only available to high level characters, due to paladins being half casters.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Matt Rick
                    Mar 27 at 16:43













                  6












                  6








                  6





                  $begingroup$

                  One issue you're likely to run into with this design, is that the list of spells with only verbal components is extremely limited. For example, there are two cantrips in the Player's Handbook with only verbal components, Xanathar's Guide to Everything has none, and the Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide has two more.



                  This would be problematic for a sorcerer, in that they will never be able to have more cantrips than they start with at level 1 (4 cantrips).



                  Outside of cantrips, the total list of spells is still very small and it only gets worse at higher level (there are a total of 11 spells level 6-9 that only have verbal components).



                  As noted below, this is basically a weaker version of a Divine Soul Sorcerer, but with access to several Ranger and Paladin exclusive spells. Those classes are half casters, so your sorcerer gets access to spells that would usually only be available to higher level spells. That said, none of them are particularly powerful (Swiftquiver, for example, isn't present).



                  Overall, I'd say this class is a less powerful version of arguably the best Sorcerer subclass. The sorcerer is generally acknowledged to be underpowered, so I'd guess this would be relatively underpowered.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  One issue you're likely to run into with this design, is that the list of spells with only verbal components is extremely limited. For example, there are two cantrips in the Player's Handbook with only verbal components, Xanathar's Guide to Everything has none, and the Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide has two more.



                  This would be problematic for a sorcerer, in that they will never be able to have more cantrips than they start with at level 1 (4 cantrips).



                  Outside of cantrips, the total list of spells is still very small and it only gets worse at higher level (there are a total of 11 spells level 6-9 that only have verbal components).



                  As noted below, this is basically a weaker version of a Divine Soul Sorcerer, but with access to several Ranger and Paladin exclusive spells. Those classes are half casters, so your sorcerer gets access to spells that would usually only be available to higher level spells. That said, none of them are particularly powerful (Swiftquiver, for example, isn't present).



                  Overall, I'd say this class is a less powerful version of arguably the best Sorcerer subclass. The sorcerer is generally acknowledged to be underpowered, so I'd guess this would be relatively underpowered.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Mar 27 at 16:33

























                  answered Mar 27 at 16:20









                  Matt RickMatt Rick

                  1,250615




                  1,250615











                  • $begingroup$
                    are you saying that it can't be overpowered due to that limitation?
                    $endgroup$
                    – KorvinStarmast
                    Mar 27 at 16:24






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    Or are you saying that is is underpowered. In short, what is your conclusion?
                    $endgroup$
                    – David Coffron
                    Mar 27 at 16:26










                  • $begingroup$
                    FWIW, as I review the spell list it looks like a variation on the Divine Soul sorc.
                    $endgroup$
                    – KorvinStarmast
                    Mar 27 at 16:27






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @András sounds like part of answer; I was asking a clarifying question of the OP.
                    $endgroup$
                    – David Coffron
                    Mar 27 at 16:28






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    @pbuchheit I would carefully evaluate the paladin exclusive spells, especially the lvl 4 and 5 ones. Those are usually only available to high level characters, due to paladins being half casters.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Matt Rick
                    Mar 27 at 16:43
















                  • $begingroup$
                    are you saying that it can't be overpowered due to that limitation?
                    $endgroup$
                    – KorvinStarmast
                    Mar 27 at 16:24






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    Or are you saying that is is underpowered. In short, what is your conclusion?
                    $endgroup$
                    – David Coffron
                    Mar 27 at 16:26










                  • $begingroup$
                    FWIW, as I review the spell list it looks like a variation on the Divine Soul sorc.
                    $endgroup$
                    – KorvinStarmast
                    Mar 27 at 16:27






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @András sounds like part of answer; I was asking a clarifying question of the OP.
                    $endgroup$
                    – David Coffron
                    Mar 27 at 16:28






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    @pbuchheit I would carefully evaluate the paladin exclusive spells, especially the lvl 4 and 5 ones. Those are usually only available to high level characters, due to paladins being half casters.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Matt Rick
                    Mar 27 at 16:43















                  $begingroup$
                  are you saying that it can't be overpowered due to that limitation?
                  $endgroup$
                  – KorvinStarmast
                  Mar 27 at 16:24




                  $begingroup$
                  are you saying that it can't be overpowered due to that limitation?
                  $endgroup$
                  – KorvinStarmast
                  Mar 27 at 16:24




                  2




                  2




                  $begingroup$
                  Or are you saying that is is underpowered. In short, what is your conclusion?
                  $endgroup$
                  – David Coffron
                  Mar 27 at 16:26




                  $begingroup$
                  Or are you saying that is is underpowered. In short, what is your conclusion?
                  $endgroup$
                  – David Coffron
                  Mar 27 at 16:26












                  $begingroup$
                  FWIW, as I review the spell list it looks like a variation on the Divine Soul sorc.
                  $endgroup$
                  – KorvinStarmast
                  Mar 27 at 16:27




                  $begingroup$
                  FWIW, as I review the spell list it looks like a variation on the Divine Soul sorc.
                  $endgroup$
                  – KorvinStarmast
                  Mar 27 at 16:27




                  1




                  1




                  $begingroup$
                  @András sounds like part of answer; I was asking a clarifying question of the OP.
                  $endgroup$
                  – David Coffron
                  Mar 27 at 16:28




                  $begingroup$
                  @András sounds like part of answer; I was asking a clarifying question of the OP.
                  $endgroup$
                  – David Coffron
                  Mar 27 at 16:28




                  2




                  2




                  $begingroup$
                  @pbuchheit I would carefully evaluate the paladin exclusive spells, especially the lvl 4 and 5 ones. Those are usually only available to high level characters, due to paladins being half casters.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Matt Rick
                  Mar 27 at 16:43




                  $begingroup$
                  @pbuchheit I would carefully evaluate the paladin exclusive spells, especially the lvl 4 and 5 ones. Those are usually only available to high level characters, due to paladins being half casters.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Matt Rick
                  Mar 27 at 16:43











                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  It is still weak even if you add these above the usual Sorcerer list



                  Divine Soul Sorcerers can learn spells from the Sorcerer and Cleric list.

                  They also get 2d4 per short rest to an attack or save, and empowered healing and wings and half their hit points for a bonus action.



                  I am comparing to the arguably best Sorcerer origin, but as long as it is weaker than the current best, it cannot be overpowered.



                  My recommendation is to use Divine Soul as a template, so add these spells, and some other features for levels 1, 6, 14 and 18.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$

















                    2












                    $begingroup$

                    It is still weak even if you add these above the usual Sorcerer list



                    Divine Soul Sorcerers can learn spells from the Sorcerer and Cleric list.

                    They also get 2d4 per short rest to an attack or save, and empowered healing and wings and half their hit points for a bonus action.



                    I am comparing to the arguably best Sorcerer origin, but as long as it is weaker than the current best, it cannot be overpowered.



                    My recommendation is to use Divine Soul as a template, so add these spells, and some other features for levels 1, 6, 14 and 18.






                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$















                      2












                      2








                      2





                      $begingroup$

                      It is still weak even if you add these above the usual Sorcerer list



                      Divine Soul Sorcerers can learn spells from the Sorcerer and Cleric list.

                      They also get 2d4 per short rest to an attack or save, and empowered healing and wings and half their hit points for a bonus action.



                      I am comparing to the arguably best Sorcerer origin, but as long as it is weaker than the current best, it cannot be overpowered.



                      My recommendation is to use Divine Soul as a template, so add these spells, and some other features for levels 1, 6, 14 and 18.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      It is still weak even if you add these above the usual Sorcerer list



                      Divine Soul Sorcerers can learn spells from the Sorcerer and Cleric list.

                      They also get 2d4 per short rest to an attack or save, and empowered healing and wings and half their hit points for a bonus action.



                      I am comparing to the arguably best Sorcerer origin, but as long as it is weaker than the current best, it cannot be overpowered.



                      My recommendation is to use Divine Soul as a template, so add these spells, and some other features for levels 1, 6, 14 and 18.







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Mar 28 at 1:25









                      V2Blast

                      26.2k590160




                      26.2k590160










                      answered Mar 27 at 16:57









                      AndrásAndrás

                      29.5k15113208




                      29.5k15113208





















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          The spells are deeply restricted, but it doesn't have to be this stark.



                          The size of the cantrip list alone is an issue. The fact that many of these effects are not amazing for the sorcerer is another. Many of them, for example, strognly encourage melee combat - not an area that the sorceror particularly shines in. By contrast, you're missing almost all of the blasting spells that are the default sorceror's bread and butter.



                          On the other hand, you do have class features to play with. One of the more obvious solutions for this one would be to have a class feature that lets you skip the material components (within a certain budget) and the somatic components, but removes access to the Subtle Spell metamagic or any other form of removing access to verbal components.



                          Of course, you might still want to do some surgery to the spell list after this. In particular, the powers described for the various incarnations of the elfsong aren't necessarily well-aligned with either the Sorceror list or the Verbal-only list. It's going to have to be up to you to decide how far to take that, though.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$

















                            1












                            $begingroup$

                            The spells are deeply restricted, but it doesn't have to be this stark.



                            The size of the cantrip list alone is an issue. The fact that many of these effects are not amazing for the sorcerer is another. Many of them, for example, strognly encourage melee combat - not an area that the sorceror particularly shines in. By contrast, you're missing almost all of the blasting spells that are the default sorceror's bread and butter.



                            On the other hand, you do have class features to play with. One of the more obvious solutions for this one would be to have a class feature that lets you skip the material components (within a certain budget) and the somatic components, but removes access to the Subtle Spell metamagic or any other form of removing access to verbal components.



                            Of course, you might still want to do some surgery to the spell list after this. In particular, the powers described for the various incarnations of the elfsong aren't necessarily well-aligned with either the Sorceror list or the Verbal-only list. It's going to have to be up to you to decide how far to take that, though.






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$















                              1












                              1








                              1





                              $begingroup$

                              The spells are deeply restricted, but it doesn't have to be this stark.



                              The size of the cantrip list alone is an issue. The fact that many of these effects are not amazing for the sorcerer is another. Many of them, for example, strognly encourage melee combat - not an area that the sorceror particularly shines in. By contrast, you're missing almost all of the blasting spells that are the default sorceror's bread and butter.



                              On the other hand, you do have class features to play with. One of the more obvious solutions for this one would be to have a class feature that lets you skip the material components (within a certain budget) and the somatic components, but removes access to the Subtle Spell metamagic or any other form of removing access to verbal components.



                              Of course, you might still want to do some surgery to the spell list after this. In particular, the powers described for the various incarnations of the elfsong aren't necessarily well-aligned with either the Sorceror list or the Verbal-only list. It's going to have to be up to you to decide how far to take that, though.






                              share|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$



                              The spells are deeply restricted, but it doesn't have to be this stark.



                              The size of the cantrip list alone is an issue. The fact that many of these effects are not amazing for the sorcerer is another. Many of them, for example, strognly encourage melee combat - not an area that the sorceror particularly shines in. By contrast, you're missing almost all of the blasting spells that are the default sorceror's bread and butter.



                              On the other hand, you do have class features to play with. One of the more obvious solutions for this one would be to have a class feature that lets you skip the material components (within a certain budget) and the somatic components, but removes access to the Subtle Spell metamagic or any other form of removing access to verbal components.



                              Of course, you might still want to do some surgery to the spell list after this. In particular, the powers described for the various incarnations of the elfsong aren't necessarily well-aligned with either the Sorceror list or the Verbal-only list. It's going to have to be up to you to decide how far to take that, though.







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered Mar 27 at 17:24









                              Ben BardenBen Barden

                              12.1k13067




                              12.1k13067





















                                  1












                                  $begingroup$

                                  Nothing Gamebreaking, but a Problematic Subclass



                                  The good news is there really doesn't seem to be any spells that are overpowered (well, Wish, but Sorcerers get that anyway), so the answer your primary stated question/concern is a simple "no, none of these spells will break your game". Lets move on to the trouble:



                                  Weak, Though This May Not Bother You Thematically



                                  As others have discussed at length, this subclass is getting a very limited selection of spells versus other full spell-casters. Perhaps a larger issue, however, is that they simply don't have a viable list of spells at certain levels. I think a sorcerer without stronger attack cantrips is probably going to be a pretty useless party member for the first couple levels (when they have few spell slots) compared to any other subclass of any class. Meanwhile in the top two tiers they get very few spells at all, which means that spell-wise they will start to become a comparatively even weaker subclass after level ten.



                                  However this is a subclass built strongly around a theme, and thematic strength can offset mechanical weakness to people who care enough about theme. Still having mechanics that bear out the promise of the theme is important even to many people who prefer role-play to roll-play.



                                  Stronger for a Fighter-Caster Subclass or with Some Special Ability to Use Related Spells. But This May Bother You Thematically



                                  The spells they gain are disproportionately Paladin and Ranger spells, and many require a melee attack. This would suggest that if their subclass features involved weapons, armor, an extra attack at level six (like valor bards, sword bards and bladesingers), something to give them semi-competitive hit points, and/or other features to make them useful in non-magical combat then this might be a competitive subclass.



                                  If that is completely off theme (I which suspect it is for a "wishsong" theme) then perhaps they need some other special ability to make a more sorcerer appropriate at-will attack with which various smites and such can be used effectively. It just seems like without some sort of extra ability to take full advantage of smites, hunters mark, etc they are trading way too much for things they can't even get much use from and which probably don't bear out the theme.



                                  What do You Want Theme-wise?



                                  It seems like the real question is not whether these added spells are gamebreaking. Unless there is a particular exploit with metamagic it is hard to see how any RAW spells could be given to a Sorcerer and really "break" the game and most the usual suspects are spells that Sorcerers, or at least Divine Soul Sorcerers, already get. It seems like the real question, and the thing you will have to evaluate the specific spells being given for, is whether they suit the theme you are trying to achieve.






                                  share|improve this answer











                                  $endgroup$

















                                    1












                                    $begingroup$

                                    Nothing Gamebreaking, but a Problematic Subclass



                                    The good news is there really doesn't seem to be any spells that are overpowered (well, Wish, but Sorcerers get that anyway), so the answer your primary stated question/concern is a simple "no, none of these spells will break your game". Lets move on to the trouble:



                                    Weak, Though This May Not Bother You Thematically



                                    As others have discussed at length, this subclass is getting a very limited selection of spells versus other full spell-casters. Perhaps a larger issue, however, is that they simply don't have a viable list of spells at certain levels. I think a sorcerer without stronger attack cantrips is probably going to be a pretty useless party member for the first couple levels (when they have few spell slots) compared to any other subclass of any class. Meanwhile in the top two tiers they get very few spells at all, which means that spell-wise they will start to become a comparatively even weaker subclass after level ten.



                                    However this is a subclass built strongly around a theme, and thematic strength can offset mechanical weakness to people who care enough about theme. Still having mechanics that bear out the promise of the theme is important even to many people who prefer role-play to roll-play.



                                    Stronger for a Fighter-Caster Subclass or with Some Special Ability to Use Related Spells. But This May Bother You Thematically



                                    The spells they gain are disproportionately Paladin and Ranger spells, and many require a melee attack. This would suggest that if their subclass features involved weapons, armor, an extra attack at level six (like valor bards, sword bards and bladesingers), something to give them semi-competitive hit points, and/or other features to make them useful in non-magical combat then this might be a competitive subclass.



                                    If that is completely off theme (I which suspect it is for a "wishsong" theme) then perhaps they need some other special ability to make a more sorcerer appropriate at-will attack with which various smites and such can be used effectively. It just seems like without some sort of extra ability to take full advantage of smites, hunters mark, etc they are trading way too much for things they can't even get much use from and which probably don't bear out the theme.



                                    What do You Want Theme-wise?



                                    It seems like the real question is not whether these added spells are gamebreaking. Unless there is a particular exploit with metamagic it is hard to see how any RAW spells could be given to a Sorcerer and really "break" the game and most the usual suspects are spells that Sorcerers, or at least Divine Soul Sorcerers, already get. It seems like the real question, and the thing you will have to evaluate the specific spells being given for, is whether they suit the theme you are trying to achieve.






                                    share|improve this answer











                                    $endgroup$















                                      1












                                      1








                                      1





                                      $begingroup$

                                      Nothing Gamebreaking, but a Problematic Subclass



                                      The good news is there really doesn't seem to be any spells that are overpowered (well, Wish, but Sorcerers get that anyway), so the answer your primary stated question/concern is a simple "no, none of these spells will break your game". Lets move on to the trouble:



                                      Weak, Though This May Not Bother You Thematically



                                      As others have discussed at length, this subclass is getting a very limited selection of spells versus other full spell-casters. Perhaps a larger issue, however, is that they simply don't have a viable list of spells at certain levels. I think a sorcerer without stronger attack cantrips is probably going to be a pretty useless party member for the first couple levels (when they have few spell slots) compared to any other subclass of any class. Meanwhile in the top two tiers they get very few spells at all, which means that spell-wise they will start to become a comparatively even weaker subclass after level ten.



                                      However this is a subclass built strongly around a theme, and thematic strength can offset mechanical weakness to people who care enough about theme. Still having mechanics that bear out the promise of the theme is important even to many people who prefer role-play to roll-play.



                                      Stronger for a Fighter-Caster Subclass or with Some Special Ability to Use Related Spells. But This May Bother You Thematically



                                      The spells they gain are disproportionately Paladin and Ranger spells, and many require a melee attack. This would suggest that if their subclass features involved weapons, armor, an extra attack at level six (like valor bards, sword bards and bladesingers), something to give them semi-competitive hit points, and/or other features to make them useful in non-magical combat then this might be a competitive subclass.



                                      If that is completely off theme (I which suspect it is for a "wishsong" theme) then perhaps they need some other special ability to make a more sorcerer appropriate at-will attack with which various smites and such can be used effectively. It just seems like without some sort of extra ability to take full advantage of smites, hunters mark, etc they are trading way too much for things they can't even get much use from and which probably don't bear out the theme.



                                      What do You Want Theme-wise?



                                      It seems like the real question is not whether these added spells are gamebreaking. Unless there is a particular exploit with metamagic it is hard to see how any RAW spells could be given to a Sorcerer and really "break" the game and most the usual suspects are spells that Sorcerers, or at least Divine Soul Sorcerers, already get. It seems like the real question, and the thing you will have to evaluate the specific spells being given for, is whether they suit the theme you are trying to achieve.






                                      share|improve this answer











                                      $endgroup$



                                      Nothing Gamebreaking, but a Problematic Subclass



                                      The good news is there really doesn't seem to be any spells that are overpowered (well, Wish, but Sorcerers get that anyway), so the answer your primary stated question/concern is a simple "no, none of these spells will break your game". Lets move on to the trouble:



                                      Weak, Though This May Not Bother You Thematically



                                      As others have discussed at length, this subclass is getting a very limited selection of spells versus other full spell-casters. Perhaps a larger issue, however, is that they simply don't have a viable list of spells at certain levels. I think a sorcerer without stronger attack cantrips is probably going to be a pretty useless party member for the first couple levels (when they have few spell slots) compared to any other subclass of any class. Meanwhile in the top two tiers they get very few spells at all, which means that spell-wise they will start to become a comparatively even weaker subclass after level ten.



                                      However this is a subclass built strongly around a theme, and thematic strength can offset mechanical weakness to people who care enough about theme. Still having mechanics that bear out the promise of the theme is important even to many people who prefer role-play to roll-play.



                                      Stronger for a Fighter-Caster Subclass or with Some Special Ability to Use Related Spells. But This May Bother You Thematically



                                      The spells they gain are disproportionately Paladin and Ranger spells, and many require a melee attack. This would suggest that if their subclass features involved weapons, armor, an extra attack at level six (like valor bards, sword bards and bladesingers), something to give them semi-competitive hit points, and/or other features to make them useful in non-magical combat then this might be a competitive subclass.



                                      If that is completely off theme (I which suspect it is for a "wishsong" theme) then perhaps they need some other special ability to make a more sorcerer appropriate at-will attack with which various smites and such can be used effectively. It just seems like without some sort of extra ability to take full advantage of smites, hunters mark, etc they are trading way too much for things they can't even get much use from and which probably don't bear out the theme.



                                      What do You Want Theme-wise?



                                      It seems like the real question is not whether these added spells are gamebreaking. Unless there is a particular exploit with metamagic it is hard to see how any RAW spells could be given to a Sorcerer and really "break" the game and most the usual suspects are spells that Sorcerers, or at least Divine Soul Sorcerers, already get. It seems like the real question, and the thing you will have to evaluate the specific spells being given for, is whether they suit the theme you are trying to achieve.







                                      share|improve this answer














                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer








                                      edited Mar 28 at 1:25









                                      V2Blast

                                      26.2k590160




                                      26.2k590160










                                      answered Mar 27 at 21:25









                                      Benjamin OlsonBenjamin Olson

                                      8067




                                      8067



























                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded
















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid


                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function ()
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144038%2fwould-this-custom-sorcerer-variant-that-can-only-learn-any-verbal-component-only%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          -balance, dnd-5e, homebrew, sorcerer, spell-components

                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Frič See also Navigation menuinternal link

                                          Identify plant with long narrow paired leaves and reddish stems Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?What is this plant with long sharp leaves? Is it a weed?What is this 3ft high, stalky plant, with mid sized narrow leaves?What is this young shrub with opposite ovate, crenate leaves and reddish stems?What is this plant with large broad serrated leaves?Identify this upright branching weed with long leaves and reddish stemsPlease help me identify this bulbous plant with long, broad leaves and white flowersWhat is this small annual with narrow gray/green leaves and rust colored daisy-type flowers?What is this chilli plant?Does anyone know what type of chilli plant this is?Help identify this plant

                                          fontconfig warning: “/etc/fonts/fonts.conf”, line 100: unknown “element blank” The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In“tar: unrecognized option --warning” during 'apt-get install'How to fix Fontconfig errorHow do I figure out which font file is chosen for a system generic font alias?Why are some apt-get-installed fonts being ignored by fc-list, xfontsel, etc?Reload settings in /etc/fonts/conf.dTaking 30 seconds longer to boot after upgrade from jessie to stretchHow to match multiple font names with a single <match> element?Adding a custom font to fontconfigRemoving fonts from fontconfig <match> resultsBroken fonts after upgrading Firefox ESR to latest Firefox