Why does swappiness not work?Why is swappiness set to 60 by default?How can I get the amount of available memory portably across distributions?Meaning of “available” field in “free -m” commandWhy does RHEL use swap even when vm.swappiness = 1?High swapiness on VM hostreal memory usageWhat do top's %MEM and VSZ mean?swappiness and RAM usageWhat does -/+ buffers/cache means in the output of free?Expand the size of swap partitionWhy QEMU can't use the linux memory buffers memory?Linux: When time to upgrade RAMIs vm.swappiness dynamic property in linuxHow shall I understand the output of free?Swappiness set at 100, but is empty nonetheless
I see my dog run
Is there a familial term for apples and pears?
Shell script can be run only with sh command
What do you call something that goes against the spirit of the law, but is legal when interpreting the law to the letter?
Do airline pilots ever risk not hearing communication directed to them specifically, from traffic controllers?
A Journey Through Space and Time
I probably found a bug with the sudo apt install function
Why is "Reports" in sentence down without "The"
Is Social Media Science Fiction?
What do you call a Matrix-like slowdown and camera movement effect?
declaring a variable twice in IIFE
What Brexit solution does the DUP want?
How to type dʒ symbol (IPA) on Mac?
Patience, young "Padovan"
N.B. ligature in Latex
What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?
What is the command to reset a PC without deleting any files
Are tax years 2016 & 2017 back taxes deductible for tax year 2018?
Why don't electron-positron collisions release infinite energy?
Can a German sentence have two subjects?
Motorized valve interfering with button?
A function which translates a sentence to title-case
Draw simple lines in Inkscape
The use of multiple foreign keys on same column in SQL Server
Why does swappiness not work?
Why is swappiness set to 60 by default?How can I get the amount of available memory portably across distributions?Meaning of “available” field in “free -m” commandWhy does RHEL use swap even when vm.swappiness = 1?High swapiness on VM hostreal memory usageWhat do top's %MEM and VSZ mean?swappiness and RAM usageWhat does -/+ buffers/cache means in the output of free?Expand the size of swap partitionWhy QEMU can't use the linux memory buffers memory?Linux: When time to upgrade RAMIs vm.swappiness dynamic property in linuxHow shall I understand the output of free?Swappiness set at 100, but is empty nonetheless
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
We have a RHEL 7 machine, with only 2G of available RAM:
free -g
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 31 28 0 0 1 2
Swap: 15 9 5
so we decided to increase the swappiness to the maximum with vm.swappiness = 100
in /etc/sysctl.conf
instead of 10, and used sysctl -p
to apply the setting.
After some time we checked the status again:
free -g
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 31 28 0 0 2 2
Swap: 15 9 5
as we can see despite the new swappiness setting, we see from free -g
that the available RAM stays at 2G. Why? What is wrong here?
We expected to see 15G of used swap.
We also checked:
cat /proc/sys/vm/swappiness
100
so everything should work according to the new settings BUT free
shows the same situation. What is going here?
linux rhel memory swap free
add a comment |
We have a RHEL 7 machine, with only 2G of available RAM:
free -g
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 31 28 0 0 1 2
Swap: 15 9 5
so we decided to increase the swappiness to the maximum with vm.swappiness = 100
in /etc/sysctl.conf
instead of 10, and used sysctl -p
to apply the setting.
After some time we checked the status again:
free -g
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 31 28 0 0 2 2
Swap: 15 9 5
as we can see despite the new swappiness setting, we see from free -g
that the available RAM stays at 2G. Why? What is wrong here?
We expected to see 15G of used swap.
We also checked:
cat /proc/sys/vm/swappiness
100
so everything should work according to the new settings BUT free
shows the same situation. What is going here?
linux rhel memory swap free
add a comment |
We have a RHEL 7 machine, with only 2G of available RAM:
free -g
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 31 28 0 0 1 2
Swap: 15 9 5
so we decided to increase the swappiness to the maximum with vm.swappiness = 100
in /etc/sysctl.conf
instead of 10, and used sysctl -p
to apply the setting.
After some time we checked the status again:
free -g
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 31 28 0 0 2 2
Swap: 15 9 5
as we can see despite the new swappiness setting, we see from free -g
that the available RAM stays at 2G. Why? What is wrong here?
We expected to see 15G of used swap.
We also checked:
cat /proc/sys/vm/swappiness
100
so everything should work according to the new settings BUT free
shows the same situation. What is going here?
linux rhel memory swap free
We have a RHEL 7 machine, with only 2G of available RAM:
free -g
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 31 28 0 0 1 2
Swap: 15 9 5
so we decided to increase the swappiness to the maximum with vm.swappiness = 100
in /etc/sysctl.conf
instead of 10, and used sysctl -p
to apply the setting.
After some time we checked the status again:
free -g
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 31 28 0 0 2 2
Swap: 15 9 5
as we can see despite the new swappiness setting, we see from free -g
that the available RAM stays at 2G. Why? What is wrong here?
We expected to see 15G of used swap.
We also checked:
cat /proc/sys/vm/swappiness
100
so everything should work according to the new settings BUT free
shows the same situation. What is going here?
linux rhel memory swap free
linux rhel memory swap free
edited Jan 9 at 13:32
Stephen Kitt
180k25409488
180k25409488
asked Jan 9 at 11:00
yaelyael
2,81232979
2,81232979
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The swappiness
setting is working as intended. Increasing swappiness
doesn’t cause the system to prefer swap to anything else; increasing swappiness
affects the balance between the page cache and swap. When the kernel needs to make physical memory available, it can discard generally use one of two strategies: it can discard pages from the page cache (since their content is on disk), or it can move pages to swap; swappiness
determines how much it favours one strategy over another. Setting swappiness
to 0 (the minimum) means the kernel will avoid swapping until it hits various high water marks, and evict pages from the page cache instead; setting it to 100 (the maximum) means the kernel will consider swapping and evicting the page cache equally.
You’ll only see your new setting make a difference when the kernel needs more memory: you’ll see the amount of swap used increase before the amount of memory used in the cache decreases.
You can’t use swappiness
to get the kernel to keep more memory available. Physical memory is always best used rather than left free, so the kernel has no incentive to pre-emptively free physical memory (increasing available memory).
See the RHEL 7 performance tuning guide for more information.
Stephen, you mention "setting swappiness to 100 means the kernel will always prefer swapping over discarding pages from the page cache". On the other hand Thomas Nyman's answer states setting swappiness to 100 should cause the swap and page cache priorities to be equal. Are you able to comment? Thanks
– iruvar
Mar 27 at 11:59
@iruvar thanks, my explanation was indeed incorrect. In practice the effect tends to end up being that the kernel prefers swapping, presumably because of the way it takes previous scanning results into account (I haven’t thought about it enough to say for sure), but the base priorities are indeed equal whenswappiness
is set to 100.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 27 at 14:37
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f493436%2fwhy-does-swappiness-not-work%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The swappiness
setting is working as intended. Increasing swappiness
doesn’t cause the system to prefer swap to anything else; increasing swappiness
affects the balance between the page cache and swap. When the kernel needs to make physical memory available, it can discard generally use one of two strategies: it can discard pages from the page cache (since their content is on disk), or it can move pages to swap; swappiness
determines how much it favours one strategy over another. Setting swappiness
to 0 (the minimum) means the kernel will avoid swapping until it hits various high water marks, and evict pages from the page cache instead; setting it to 100 (the maximum) means the kernel will consider swapping and evicting the page cache equally.
You’ll only see your new setting make a difference when the kernel needs more memory: you’ll see the amount of swap used increase before the amount of memory used in the cache decreases.
You can’t use swappiness
to get the kernel to keep more memory available. Physical memory is always best used rather than left free, so the kernel has no incentive to pre-emptively free physical memory (increasing available memory).
See the RHEL 7 performance tuning guide for more information.
Stephen, you mention "setting swappiness to 100 means the kernel will always prefer swapping over discarding pages from the page cache". On the other hand Thomas Nyman's answer states setting swappiness to 100 should cause the swap and page cache priorities to be equal. Are you able to comment? Thanks
– iruvar
Mar 27 at 11:59
@iruvar thanks, my explanation was indeed incorrect. In practice the effect tends to end up being that the kernel prefers swapping, presumably because of the way it takes previous scanning results into account (I haven’t thought about it enough to say for sure), but the base priorities are indeed equal whenswappiness
is set to 100.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 27 at 14:37
add a comment |
The swappiness
setting is working as intended. Increasing swappiness
doesn’t cause the system to prefer swap to anything else; increasing swappiness
affects the balance between the page cache and swap. When the kernel needs to make physical memory available, it can discard generally use one of two strategies: it can discard pages from the page cache (since their content is on disk), or it can move pages to swap; swappiness
determines how much it favours one strategy over another. Setting swappiness
to 0 (the minimum) means the kernel will avoid swapping until it hits various high water marks, and evict pages from the page cache instead; setting it to 100 (the maximum) means the kernel will consider swapping and evicting the page cache equally.
You’ll only see your new setting make a difference when the kernel needs more memory: you’ll see the amount of swap used increase before the amount of memory used in the cache decreases.
You can’t use swappiness
to get the kernel to keep more memory available. Physical memory is always best used rather than left free, so the kernel has no incentive to pre-emptively free physical memory (increasing available memory).
See the RHEL 7 performance tuning guide for more information.
Stephen, you mention "setting swappiness to 100 means the kernel will always prefer swapping over discarding pages from the page cache". On the other hand Thomas Nyman's answer states setting swappiness to 100 should cause the swap and page cache priorities to be equal. Are you able to comment? Thanks
– iruvar
Mar 27 at 11:59
@iruvar thanks, my explanation was indeed incorrect. In practice the effect tends to end up being that the kernel prefers swapping, presumably because of the way it takes previous scanning results into account (I haven’t thought about it enough to say for sure), but the base priorities are indeed equal whenswappiness
is set to 100.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 27 at 14:37
add a comment |
The swappiness
setting is working as intended. Increasing swappiness
doesn’t cause the system to prefer swap to anything else; increasing swappiness
affects the balance between the page cache and swap. When the kernel needs to make physical memory available, it can discard generally use one of two strategies: it can discard pages from the page cache (since their content is on disk), or it can move pages to swap; swappiness
determines how much it favours one strategy over another. Setting swappiness
to 0 (the minimum) means the kernel will avoid swapping until it hits various high water marks, and evict pages from the page cache instead; setting it to 100 (the maximum) means the kernel will consider swapping and evicting the page cache equally.
You’ll only see your new setting make a difference when the kernel needs more memory: you’ll see the amount of swap used increase before the amount of memory used in the cache decreases.
You can’t use swappiness
to get the kernel to keep more memory available. Physical memory is always best used rather than left free, so the kernel has no incentive to pre-emptively free physical memory (increasing available memory).
See the RHEL 7 performance tuning guide for more information.
The swappiness
setting is working as intended. Increasing swappiness
doesn’t cause the system to prefer swap to anything else; increasing swappiness
affects the balance between the page cache and swap. When the kernel needs to make physical memory available, it can discard generally use one of two strategies: it can discard pages from the page cache (since their content is on disk), or it can move pages to swap; swappiness
determines how much it favours one strategy over another. Setting swappiness
to 0 (the minimum) means the kernel will avoid swapping until it hits various high water marks, and evict pages from the page cache instead; setting it to 100 (the maximum) means the kernel will consider swapping and evicting the page cache equally.
You’ll only see your new setting make a difference when the kernel needs more memory: you’ll see the amount of swap used increase before the amount of memory used in the cache decreases.
You can’t use swappiness
to get the kernel to keep more memory available. Physical memory is always best used rather than left free, so the kernel has no incentive to pre-emptively free physical memory (increasing available memory).
See the RHEL 7 performance tuning guide for more information.
edited Mar 27 at 14:35
answered Jan 9 at 13:37
Stephen KittStephen Kitt
180k25409488
180k25409488
Stephen, you mention "setting swappiness to 100 means the kernel will always prefer swapping over discarding pages from the page cache". On the other hand Thomas Nyman's answer states setting swappiness to 100 should cause the swap and page cache priorities to be equal. Are you able to comment? Thanks
– iruvar
Mar 27 at 11:59
@iruvar thanks, my explanation was indeed incorrect. In practice the effect tends to end up being that the kernel prefers swapping, presumably because of the way it takes previous scanning results into account (I haven’t thought about it enough to say for sure), but the base priorities are indeed equal whenswappiness
is set to 100.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 27 at 14:37
add a comment |
Stephen, you mention "setting swappiness to 100 means the kernel will always prefer swapping over discarding pages from the page cache". On the other hand Thomas Nyman's answer states setting swappiness to 100 should cause the swap and page cache priorities to be equal. Are you able to comment? Thanks
– iruvar
Mar 27 at 11:59
@iruvar thanks, my explanation was indeed incorrect. In practice the effect tends to end up being that the kernel prefers swapping, presumably because of the way it takes previous scanning results into account (I haven’t thought about it enough to say for sure), but the base priorities are indeed equal whenswappiness
is set to 100.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 27 at 14:37
Stephen, you mention "setting swappiness to 100 means the kernel will always prefer swapping over discarding pages from the page cache". On the other hand Thomas Nyman's answer states setting swappiness to 100 should cause the swap and page cache priorities to be equal. Are you able to comment? Thanks
– iruvar
Mar 27 at 11:59
Stephen, you mention "setting swappiness to 100 means the kernel will always prefer swapping over discarding pages from the page cache". On the other hand Thomas Nyman's answer states setting swappiness to 100 should cause the swap and page cache priorities to be equal. Are you able to comment? Thanks
– iruvar
Mar 27 at 11:59
@iruvar thanks, my explanation was indeed incorrect. In practice the effect tends to end up being that the kernel prefers swapping, presumably because of the way it takes previous scanning results into account (I haven’t thought about it enough to say for sure), but the base priorities are indeed equal when
swappiness
is set to 100.– Stephen Kitt
Mar 27 at 14:37
@iruvar thanks, my explanation was indeed incorrect. In practice the effect tends to end up being that the kernel prefers swapping, presumably because of the way it takes previous scanning results into account (I haven’t thought about it enough to say for sure), but the base priorities are indeed equal when
swappiness
is set to 100.– Stephen Kitt
Mar 27 at 14:37
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f493436%2fwhy-does-swappiness-not-work%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
-free, linux, memory, rhel, swap