Why does swappiness not work?Why is swappiness set to 60 by default?How can I get the amount of available memory portably across distributions?Meaning of “available” field in “free -m” commandWhy does RHEL use swap even when vm.swappiness = 1?High swapiness on VM hostreal memory usageWhat do top's %MEM and VSZ mean?swappiness and RAM usageWhat does -/+ buffers/cache means in the output of free?Expand the size of swap partitionWhy QEMU can't use the linux memory buffers memory?Linux: When time to upgrade RAMIs vm.swappiness dynamic property in linuxHow shall I understand the output of free?Swappiness set at 100, but is empty nonetheless

I see my dog run

Is there a familial term for apples and pears?

Shell script can be run only with sh command

What do you call something that goes against the spirit of the law, but is legal when interpreting the law to the letter?

Do airline pilots ever risk not hearing communication directed to them specifically, from traffic controllers?

A Journey Through Space and Time

I probably found a bug with the sudo apt install function

Why is "Reports" in sentence down without "The"

Is Social Media Science Fiction?

What do you call a Matrix-like slowdown and camera movement effect?

declaring a variable twice in IIFE

What Brexit solution does the DUP want?

How to type dʒ symbol (IPA) on Mac?

Patience, young "Padovan"

N.B. ligature in Latex

What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?

What is the command to reset a PC without deleting any files

Are tax years 2016 & 2017 back taxes deductible for tax year 2018?

Why don't electron-positron collisions release infinite energy?

Can a German sentence have two subjects?

Motorized valve interfering with button?

A function which translates a sentence to title-case

Draw simple lines in Inkscape

The use of multiple foreign keys on same column in SQL Server



Why does swappiness not work?


Why is swappiness set to 60 by default?How can I get the amount of available memory portably across distributions?Meaning of “available” field in “free -m” commandWhy does RHEL use swap even when vm.swappiness = 1?High swapiness on VM hostreal memory usageWhat do top's %MEM and VSZ mean?swappiness and RAM usageWhat does -/+ buffers/cache means in the output of free?Expand the size of swap partitionWhy QEMU can't use the linux memory buffers memory?Linux: When time to upgrade RAMIs vm.swappiness dynamic property in linuxHow shall I understand the output of free?Swappiness set at 100, but is empty nonetheless






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















We have a RHEL 7 machine, with only 2G of available RAM:



free -g
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 31 28 0 0 1 2
Swap: 15 9 5


so we decided to increase the swappiness to the maximum with vm.swappiness = 100 in /etc/sysctl.conf instead of 10, and used sysctl -p to apply the setting.



After some time we checked the status again:



 free -g
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 31 28 0 0 2 2
Swap: 15 9 5


as we can see despite the new swappiness setting, we see from free -g that the available RAM stays at 2G. Why? What is wrong here?



We expected to see 15G of used swap.



We also checked:



cat /proc/sys/vm/swappiness
100


so everything should work according to the new settings BUT free shows the same situation. What is going here?










share|improve this question






























    2















    We have a RHEL 7 machine, with only 2G of available RAM:



    free -g
    total used free shared buff/cache available
    Mem: 31 28 0 0 1 2
    Swap: 15 9 5


    so we decided to increase the swappiness to the maximum with vm.swappiness = 100 in /etc/sysctl.conf instead of 10, and used sysctl -p to apply the setting.



    After some time we checked the status again:



     free -g
    total used free shared buff/cache available
    Mem: 31 28 0 0 2 2
    Swap: 15 9 5


    as we can see despite the new swappiness setting, we see from free -g that the available RAM stays at 2G. Why? What is wrong here?



    We expected to see 15G of used swap.



    We also checked:



    cat /proc/sys/vm/swappiness
    100


    so everything should work according to the new settings BUT free shows the same situation. What is going here?










    share|improve this question


























      2












      2








      2








      We have a RHEL 7 machine, with only 2G of available RAM:



      free -g
      total used free shared buff/cache available
      Mem: 31 28 0 0 1 2
      Swap: 15 9 5


      so we decided to increase the swappiness to the maximum with vm.swappiness = 100 in /etc/sysctl.conf instead of 10, and used sysctl -p to apply the setting.



      After some time we checked the status again:



       free -g
      total used free shared buff/cache available
      Mem: 31 28 0 0 2 2
      Swap: 15 9 5


      as we can see despite the new swappiness setting, we see from free -g that the available RAM stays at 2G. Why? What is wrong here?



      We expected to see 15G of used swap.



      We also checked:



      cat /proc/sys/vm/swappiness
      100


      so everything should work according to the new settings BUT free shows the same situation. What is going here?










      share|improve this question
















      We have a RHEL 7 machine, with only 2G of available RAM:



      free -g
      total used free shared buff/cache available
      Mem: 31 28 0 0 1 2
      Swap: 15 9 5


      so we decided to increase the swappiness to the maximum with vm.swappiness = 100 in /etc/sysctl.conf instead of 10, and used sysctl -p to apply the setting.



      After some time we checked the status again:



       free -g
      total used free shared buff/cache available
      Mem: 31 28 0 0 2 2
      Swap: 15 9 5


      as we can see despite the new swappiness setting, we see from free -g that the available RAM stays at 2G. Why? What is wrong here?



      We expected to see 15G of used swap.



      We also checked:



      cat /proc/sys/vm/swappiness
      100


      so everything should work according to the new settings BUT free shows the same situation. What is going here?







      linux rhel memory swap free






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jan 9 at 13:32









      Stephen Kitt

      180k25409488




      180k25409488










      asked Jan 9 at 11:00









      yaelyael

      2,81232979




      2,81232979




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          The swappiness setting is working as intended. Increasing swappiness doesn’t cause the system to prefer swap to anything else; increasing swappiness affects the balance between the page cache and swap. When the kernel needs to make physical memory available, it can discard generally use one of two strategies: it can discard pages from the page cache (since their content is on disk), or it can move pages to swap; swappiness determines how much it favours one strategy over another. Setting swappiness to 0 (the minimum) means the kernel will avoid swapping until it hits various high water marks, and evict pages from the page cache instead; setting it to 100 (the maximum) means the kernel will consider swapping and evicting the page cache equally.



          You’ll only see your new setting make a difference when the kernel needs more memory: you’ll see the amount of swap used increase before the amount of memory used in the cache decreases.



          You can’t use swappiness to get the kernel to keep more memory available. Physical memory is always best used rather than left free, so the kernel has no incentive to pre-emptively free physical memory (increasing available memory).



          See the RHEL 7 performance tuning guide for more information.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Stephen, you mention "setting swappiness to 100 means the kernel will always prefer swapping over discarding pages from the page cache". On the other hand Thomas Nyman's answer states setting swappiness to 100 should cause the swap and page cache priorities to be equal. Are you able to comment? Thanks

            – iruvar
            Mar 27 at 11:59












          • @iruvar thanks, my explanation was indeed incorrect. In practice the effect tends to end up being that the kernel prefers swapping, presumably because of the way it takes previous scanning results into account (I haven’t thought about it enough to say for sure), but the base priorities are indeed equal when swappiness is set to 100.

            – Stephen Kitt
            Mar 27 at 14:37











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f493436%2fwhy-does-swappiness-not-work%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5














          The swappiness setting is working as intended. Increasing swappiness doesn’t cause the system to prefer swap to anything else; increasing swappiness affects the balance between the page cache and swap. When the kernel needs to make physical memory available, it can discard generally use one of two strategies: it can discard pages from the page cache (since their content is on disk), or it can move pages to swap; swappiness determines how much it favours one strategy over another. Setting swappiness to 0 (the minimum) means the kernel will avoid swapping until it hits various high water marks, and evict pages from the page cache instead; setting it to 100 (the maximum) means the kernel will consider swapping and evicting the page cache equally.



          You’ll only see your new setting make a difference when the kernel needs more memory: you’ll see the amount of swap used increase before the amount of memory used in the cache decreases.



          You can’t use swappiness to get the kernel to keep more memory available. Physical memory is always best used rather than left free, so the kernel has no incentive to pre-emptively free physical memory (increasing available memory).



          See the RHEL 7 performance tuning guide for more information.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Stephen, you mention "setting swappiness to 100 means the kernel will always prefer swapping over discarding pages from the page cache". On the other hand Thomas Nyman's answer states setting swappiness to 100 should cause the swap and page cache priorities to be equal. Are you able to comment? Thanks

            – iruvar
            Mar 27 at 11:59












          • @iruvar thanks, my explanation was indeed incorrect. In practice the effect tends to end up being that the kernel prefers swapping, presumably because of the way it takes previous scanning results into account (I haven’t thought about it enough to say for sure), but the base priorities are indeed equal when swappiness is set to 100.

            – Stephen Kitt
            Mar 27 at 14:37















          5














          The swappiness setting is working as intended. Increasing swappiness doesn’t cause the system to prefer swap to anything else; increasing swappiness affects the balance between the page cache and swap. When the kernel needs to make physical memory available, it can discard generally use one of two strategies: it can discard pages from the page cache (since their content is on disk), or it can move pages to swap; swappiness determines how much it favours one strategy over another. Setting swappiness to 0 (the minimum) means the kernel will avoid swapping until it hits various high water marks, and evict pages from the page cache instead; setting it to 100 (the maximum) means the kernel will consider swapping and evicting the page cache equally.



          You’ll only see your new setting make a difference when the kernel needs more memory: you’ll see the amount of swap used increase before the amount of memory used in the cache decreases.



          You can’t use swappiness to get the kernel to keep more memory available. Physical memory is always best used rather than left free, so the kernel has no incentive to pre-emptively free physical memory (increasing available memory).



          See the RHEL 7 performance tuning guide for more information.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Stephen, you mention "setting swappiness to 100 means the kernel will always prefer swapping over discarding pages from the page cache". On the other hand Thomas Nyman's answer states setting swappiness to 100 should cause the swap and page cache priorities to be equal. Are you able to comment? Thanks

            – iruvar
            Mar 27 at 11:59












          • @iruvar thanks, my explanation was indeed incorrect. In practice the effect tends to end up being that the kernel prefers swapping, presumably because of the way it takes previous scanning results into account (I haven’t thought about it enough to say for sure), but the base priorities are indeed equal when swappiness is set to 100.

            – Stephen Kitt
            Mar 27 at 14:37













          5












          5








          5







          The swappiness setting is working as intended. Increasing swappiness doesn’t cause the system to prefer swap to anything else; increasing swappiness affects the balance between the page cache and swap. When the kernel needs to make physical memory available, it can discard generally use one of two strategies: it can discard pages from the page cache (since their content is on disk), or it can move pages to swap; swappiness determines how much it favours one strategy over another. Setting swappiness to 0 (the minimum) means the kernel will avoid swapping until it hits various high water marks, and evict pages from the page cache instead; setting it to 100 (the maximum) means the kernel will consider swapping and evicting the page cache equally.



          You’ll only see your new setting make a difference when the kernel needs more memory: you’ll see the amount of swap used increase before the amount of memory used in the cache decreases.



          You can’t use swappiness to get the kernel to keep more memory available. Physical memory is always best used rather than left free, so the kernel has no incentive to pre-emptively free physical memory (increasing available memory).



          See the RHEL 7 performance tuning guide for more information.






          share|improve this answer















          The swappiness setting is working as intended. Increasing swappiness doesn’t cause the system to prefer swap to anything else; increasing swappiness affects the balance between the page cache and swap. When the kernel needs to make physical memory available, it can discard generally use one of two strategies: it can discard pages from the page cache (since their content is on disk), or it can move pages to swap; swappiness determines how much it favours one strategy over another. Setting swappiness to 0 (the minimum) means the kernel will avoid swapping until it hits various high water marks, and evict pages from the page cache instead; setting it to 100 (the maximum) means the kernel will consider swapping and evicting the page cache equally.



          You’ll only see your new setting make a difference when the kernel needs more memory: you’ll see the amount of swap used increase before the amount of memory used in the cache decreases.



          You can’t use swappiness to get the kernel to keep more memory available. Physical memory is always best used rather than left free, so the kernel has no incentive to pre-emptively free physical memory (increasing available memory).



          See the RHEL 7 performance tuning guide for more information.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Mar 27 at 14:35

























          answered Jan 9 at 13:37









          Stephen KittStephen Kitt

          180k25409488




          180k25409488












          • Stephen, you mention "setting swappiness to 100 means the kernel will always prefer swapping over discarding pages from the page cache". On the other hand Thomas Nyman's answer states setting swappiness to 100 should cause the swap and page cache priorities to be equal. Are you able to comment? Thanks

            – iruvar
            Mar 27 at 11:59












          • @iruvar thanks, my explanation was indeed incorrect. In practice the effect tends to end up being that the kernel prefers swapping, presumably because of the way it takes previous scanning results into account (I haven’t thought about it enough to say for sure), but the base priorities are indeed equal when swappiness is set to 100.

            – Stephen Kitt
            Mar 27 at 14:37

















          • Stephen, you mention "setting swappiness to 100 means the kernel will always prefer swapping over discarding pages from the page cache". On the other hand Thomas Nyman's answer states setting swappiness to 100 should cause the swap and page cache priorities to be equal. Are you able to comment? Thanks

            – iruvar
            Mar 27 at 11:59












          • @iruvar thanks, my explanation was indeed incorrect. In practice the effect tends to end up being that the kernel prefers swapping, presumably because of the way it takes previous scanning results into account (I haven’t thought about it enough to say for sure), but the base priorities are indeed equal when swappiness is set to 100.

            – Stephen Kitt
            Mar 27 at 14:37
















          Stephen, you mention "setting swappiness to 100 means the kernel will always prefer swapping over discarding pages from the page cache". On the other hand Thomas Nyman's answer states setting swappiness to 100 should cause the swap and page cache priorities to be equal. Are you able to comment? Thanks

          – iruvar
          Mar 27 at 11:59






          Stephen, you mention "setting swappiness to 100 means the kernel will always prefer swapping over discarding pages from the page cache". On the other hand Thomas Nyman's answer states setting swappiness to 100 should cause the swap and page cache priorities to be equal. Are you able to comment? Thanks

          – iruvar
          Mar 27 at 11:59














          @iruvar thanks, my explanation was indeed incorrect. In practice the effect tends to end up being that the kernel prefers swapping, presumably because of the way it takes previous scanning results into account (I haven’t thought about it enough to say for sure), but the base priorities are indeed equal when swappiness is set to 100.

          – Stephen Kitt
          Mar 27 at 14:37





          @iruvar thanks, my explanation was indeed incorrect. In practice the effect tends to end up being that the kernel prefers swapping, presumably because of the way it takes previous scanning results into account (I haven’t thought about it enough to say for sure), but the base priorities are indeed equal when swappiness is set to 100.

          – Stephen Kitt
          Mar 27 at 14:37

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f493436%2fwhy-does-swappiness-not-work%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -free, linux, memory, rhel, swap

          Popular posts from this blog

          Mobil Contents History Mobil brands Former Mobil brands Lukoil transaction Mobil UK Mobil Australia Mobil New Zealand Mobil Greece Mobil in Japan Mobil in Canada Mobil Egypt See also References External links Navigation menuwww.mobil.com"Mobil Corporation"the original"Our Houston campus""Business & Finance: Socony-Vacuum Corp.""Popular Mechanics""Lubrite Technologies""Exxon Mobil campus 'clearly happening'""Toledo Blade - Google News Archive Search""The Lion and the Moose - How 2 Executives Pulled off the Biggest Merger Ever""ExxonMobil Press Release""Lubricants""Archived copy"the original"Mobil 1™ and Mobil Super™ motor oil and synthetic motor oil - Mobil™ Motor Oils""Mobil Delvac""Mobil Industrial website""The State of Competition in Gasoline Marketing: The Effects of Refiner Operations at Retail""Mobil Travel Guide to become Forbes Travel Guide""Hotel Rankings: Forbes Merges with Mobil"the original"Jamieson oil industry history""Mobil news""Caltex pumps for control""Watchdog blocks Caltex bid""Exxon Mobil sells service station network""Mobil Oil New Zealand Limited is New Zealand's oldest oil company, with predecessor companies having first established a presence in the country in 1896""ExxonMobil subsidiaries have a business history in New Zealand stretching back more than 120 years. We are involved in petroleum refining and distribution and the marketing of fuels, lubricants and chemical products""Archived copy"the original"Exxon Mobil to Sell Its Japanese Arm for $3.9 Billion""Gas station merger will end Esso and Mobil's long run in Japan""Esso moves to affiliate itself with PC Optimum, no longer Aeroplan, in loyalty point switch""Mobil brand of gas stations to launch in Canada after deal for 213 Loblaws-owned locations""Mobil Nears Completion of Rebranding 200 Loblaw Gas Stations""Learn about ExxonMobil's operations in Egypt""Petrol and Diesel Service Stations in Egypt - Mobil"Official websiteExxon Mobil corporate websiteMobil Industrial official websiteeeeeeeeDA04275022275790-40000 0001 0860 5061n82045453134887257134887257

          Frič See also Navigation menuinternal link

          Identify plant with long narrow paired leaves and reddish stems Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?What is this plant with long sharp leaves? Is it a weed?What is this 3ft high, stalky plant, with mid sized narrow leaves?What is this young shrub with opposite ovate, crenate leaves and reddish stems?What is this plant with large broad serrated leaves?Identify this upright branching weed with long leaves and reddish stemsPlease help me identify this bulbous plant with long, broad leaves and white flowersWhat is this small annual with narrow gray/green leaves and rust colored daisy-type flowers?What is this chilli plant?Does anyone know what type of chilli plant this is?Help identify this plant