Have systemd not kill your service if it is in a state it should not be killedMake systemd reload only single openvpn process and not the whole grouphow does systemd determine service is stopped?Systemd - how service can determine first run from restart run?Why is systemd stopping service immediately after it is started?Instruct to execute an unit after completing another unit successfullysystemd: finish the execution of custom shell script before starting nginxStopping systemd unit together with another. Starting workssystemd doesn't recognize init.d statussystemd not autorestarting the last docker container after it crashes or kill -9 or docker stop serviceDoes systemctl consider service dependencies when starting or stopping multiple services in one command?

Curses work by shouting - How to avoid collateral damage?

What is difference between behavior and behaviour

What is the intuitive meaning of having a linear relationship between the logs of two variables?

What defines a dissertation?

Have I saved too much for retirement so far?

apt-get update is failing in debian

I'm in charge of equipment buying but no one's ever happy with what I choose. How to fix this?

Are there any comparative studies done between Ashtavakra Gita and Buddhim?

Implement the Thanos sorting algorithm

Valid Badminton Score?

How can I replace every global instance of "x[2]" with "x_2"

Failed to fetch jessie backports repository

Why "be dealt cards" rather than "be dealing cards"?

Where in the Bible does the greeting ("Dominus Vobiscum") used at Mass come from?

Is the destination of a commercial flight important for the pilot?

Go Pregnant or Go Home

Why is delta-v is the most useful quantity for planning space travel?

Efficiently merge handle parallel feature branches in SFDX

What to do with wrong results in talks?

How could Frankenstein get the parts for his _second_ creature?

Is there an Impartial Brexit Deal comparison site?

Minimal reference content

What will be the benefits of Brexit?

Teaching indefinite integrals that require special-casing



Have systemd not kill your service if it is in a state it should not be killed


Make systemd reload only single openvpn process and not the whole grouphow does systemd determine service is stopped?Systemd - how service can determine first run from restart run?Why is systemd stopping service immediately after it is started?Instruct to execute an unit after completing another unit successfullysystemd: finish the execution of custom shell script before starting nginxStopping systemd unit together with another. Starting workssystemd doesn't recognize init.d statussystemd not autorestarting the last docker container after it crashes or kill -9 or docker stop serviceDoes systemctl consider service dependencies when starting or stopping multiple services in one command?













3















I have a question regarding the configuration of a systemd service.



The service application is an application the controls a machine. Within the application the SIGINT, SIGTERM, SIGQUIT and SIGHUP are captured. When the machine is "RUNNING", these signals are ignored and the application is not exited. If the machine is in "STOPPED" mode, the controlling application is exited.



We want to boot this application together with Linux, so we added the application as a systemd service.



We have the following configuration so far:



[Unit]
Description=Machine control service
After=network.target

[Service]
Type=simple
User=simplemachine
Group=simplemachine
CPUSchedulingPolicy=other
LimitRTPRIO=80
LimitRTTIME=infinity

WorkingDirectory=/opt/simplemachine/bin/
ExecStart=/opt/simplemachine/bin/simplemachine
KillMode=none
Restart=always
RestartSec=10

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target


Now I have the following questions.
When I perform:



sudo systemctl stop machine.service


I would like systemctl to send a SIGTERM, this way the application is only stopped when it is allowed to stopped.
Also when the application does not stop. It would be nice that systemctl does not kill the process, but for example returns some kind of fault or timeout code meaning that it may not stop the process.



How can I achieve this with the new systemd system?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • That is just a shot in the dark, is ExecStop usefully in some way? for example by creating a shell script that will consider the importance of this(I am not very sure if systemd at end will not try to crazy stop your service). How can someone dislike this post. It is a genuine question.

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    yesterday
















3















I have a question regarding the configuration of a systemd service.



The service application is an application the controls a machine. Within the application the SIGINT, SIGTERM, SIGQUIT and SIGHUP are captured. When the machine is "RUNNING", these signals are ignored and the application is not exited. If the machine is in "STOPPED" mode, the controlling application is exited.



We want to boot this application together with Linux, so we added the application as a systemd service.



We have the following configuration so far:



[Unit]
Description=Machine control service
After=network.target

[Service]
Type=simple
User=simplemachine
Group=simplemachine
CPUSchedulingPolicy=other
LimitRTPRIO=80
LimitRTTIME=infinity

WorkingDirectory=/opt/simplemachine/bin/
ExecStart=/opt/simplemachine/bin/simplemachine
KillMode=none
Restart=always
RestartSec=10

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target


Now I have the following questions.
When I perform:



sudo systemctl stop machine.service


I would like systemctl to send a SIGTERM, this way the application is only stopped when it is allowed to stopped.
Also when the application does not stop. It would be nice that systemctl does not kill the process, but for example returns some kind of fault or timeout code meaning that it may not stop the process.



How can I achieve this with the new systemd system?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • That is just a shot in the dark, is ExecStop usefully in some way? for example by creating a shell script that will consider the importance of this(I am not very sure if systemd at end will not try to crazy stop your service). How can someone dislike this post. It is a genuine question.

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    yesterday














3












3








3


1






I have a question regarding the configuration of a systemd service.



The service application is an application the controls a machine. Within the application the SIGINT, SIGTERM, SIGQUIT and SIGHUP are captured. When the machine is "RUNNING", these signals are ignored and the application is not exited. If the machine is in "STOPPED" mode, the controlling application is exited.



We want to boot this application together with Linux, so we added the application as a systemd service.



We have the following configuration so far:



[Unit]
Description=Machine control service
After=network.target

[Service]
Type=simple
User=simplemachine
Group=simplemachine
CPUSchedulingPolicy=other
LimitRTPRIO=80
LimitRTTIME=infinity

WorkingDirectory=/opt/simplemachine/bin/
ExecStart=/opt/simplemachine/bin/simplemachine
KillMode=none
Restart=always
RestartSec=10

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target


Now I have the following questions.
When I perform:



sudo systemctl stop machine.service


I would like systemctl to send a SIGTERM, this way the application is only stopped when it is allowed to stopped.
Also when the application does not stop. It would be nice that systemctl does not kill the process, but for example returns some kind of fault or timeout code meaning that it may not stop the process.



How can I achieve this with the new systemd system?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I have a question regarding the configuration of a systemd service.



The service application is an application the controls a machine. Within the application the SIGINT, SIGTERM, SIGQUIT and SIGHUP are captured. When the machine is "RUNNING", these signals are ignored and the application is not exited. If the machine is in "STOPPED" mode, the controlling application is exited.



We want to boot this application together with Linux, so we added the application as a systemd service.



We have the following configuration so far:



[Unit]
Description=Machine control service
After=network.target

[Service]
Type=simple
User=simplemachine
Group=simplemachine
CPUSchedulingPolicy=other
LimitRTPRIO=80
LimitRTTIME=infinity

WorkingDirectory=/opt/simplemachine/bin/
ExecStart=/opt/simplemachine/bin/simplemachine
KillMode=none
Restart=always
RestartSec=10

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target


Now I have the following questions.
When I perform:



sudo systemctl stop machine.service


I would like systemctl to send a SIGTERM, this way the application is only stopped when it is allowed to stopped.
Also when the application does not stop. It would be nice that systemctl does not kill the process, but for example returns some kind of fault or timeout code meaning that it may not stop the process.



How can I achieve this with the new systemd system?







linux systemd systemctl






share|improve this question









New contributor




Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









Rui F Ribeiro

41.7k1483142




41.7k1483142






New contributor




Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Jan JaapJan Jaap

191




191




New contributor




Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • That is just a shot in the dark, is ExecStop usefully in some way? for example by creating a shell script that will consider the importance of this(I am not very sure if systemd at end will not try to crazy stop your service). How can someone dislike this post. It is a genuine question.

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    yesterday


















  • That is just a shot in the dark, is ExecStop usefully in some way? for example by creating a shell script that will consider the importance of this(I am not very sure if systemd at end will not try to crazy stop your service). How can someone dislike this post. It is a genuine question.

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    yesterday

















That is just a shot in the dark, is ExecStop usefully in some way? for example by creating a shell script that will consider the importance of this(I am not very sure if systemd at end will not try to crazy stop your service). How can someone dislike this post. It is a genuine question.

– Luciano Andress Martini
yesterday






That is just a shot in the dark, is ExecStop usefully in some way? for example by creating a shell script that will consider the importance of this(I am not very sure if systemd at end will not try to crazy stop your service). How can someone dislike this post. It is a genuine question.

– Luciano Andress Martini
yesterday











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














This answer is primarily based on the documentation for systemd.kill. I'll see if I can do some actual tests with a service and update it accordingly.



The requirement here should be satisified by setting SendSIGKILL=no in your unit file. To allow the initial SIGTERM to be sent, you will likely need to restore the KillMode option to its default value, which is control-group.



With these settings, running systemctl stop machine.service should work like this:



  1. Because there are no ExecStop= commands specified in the unit file, a SIGTERM is sent to the process.


  2. After a period of 90 seconds (DefaultTimeoutStopSec), systemd considers terminating the process forcefully.


  3. Because SendSIGKILL is set to no, SIGKILL (FinalKillSignal) is not sent to the process, and the process continues running.


In effect, the only signal sent to the process on systemctl stop will be SIGTERM. Since the handling of SIGTERM is handled within the application itself, systemctl stop should work as intended: stops the application when the remote machine is down, times out when the remote machine is up.



As an additional note, the 90 seconds timeout can be configured with TimeoutStopSec.






share|improve this answer























  • Unfortunately while the process will indeed not be killed, systemd will consider the unit to be failed in such a situation. This likely may not be what the OP would want.

    – Michał Politowski
    yesterday










Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Jan Jaap is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f508484%2fhave-systemd-not-kill-your-service-if-it-is-in-a-state-it-should-not-be-killed%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














This answer is primarily based on the documentation for systemd.kill. I'll see if I can do some actual tests with a service and update it accordingly.



The requirement here should be satisified by setting SendSIGKILL=no in your unit file. To allow the initial SIGTERM to be sent, you will likely need to restore the KillMode option to its default value, which is control-group.



With these settings, running systemctl stop machine.service should work like this:



  1. Because there are no ExecStop= commands specified in the unit file, a SIGTERM is sent to the process.


  2. After a period of 90 seconds (DefaultTimeoutStopSec), systemd considers terminating the process forcefully.


  3. Because SendSIGKILL is set to no, SIGKILL (FinalKillSignal) is not sent to the process, and the process continues running.


In effect, the only signal sent to the process on systemctl stop will be SIGTERM. Since the handling of SIGTERM is handled within the application itself, systemctl stop should work as intended: stops the application when the remote machine is down, times out when the remote machine is up.



As an additional note, the 90 seconds timeout can be configured with TimeoutStopSec.






share|improve this answer























  • Unfortunately while the process will indeed not be killed, systemd will consider the unit to be failed in such a situation. This likely may not be what the OP would want.

    – Michał Politowski
    yesterday















1














This answer is primarily based on the documentation for systemd.kill. I'll see if I can do some actual tests with a service and update it accordingly.



The requirement here should be satisified by setting SendSIGKILL=no in your unit file. To allow the initial SIGTERM to be sent, you will likely need to restore the KillMode option to its default value, which is control-group.



With these settings, running systemctl stop machine.service should work like this:



  1. Because there are no ExecStop= commands specified in the unit file, a SIGTERM is sent to the process.


  2. After a period of 90 seconds (DefaultTimeoutStopSec), systemd considers terminating the process forcefully.


  3. Because SendSIGKILL is set to no, SIGKILL (FinalKillSignal) is not sent to the process, and the process continues running.


In effect, the only signal sent to the process on systemctl stop will be SIGTERM. Since the handling of SIGTERM is handled within the application itself, systemctl stop should work as intended: stops the application when the remote machine is down, times out when the remote machine is up.



As an additional note, the 90 seconds timeout can be configured with TimeoutStopSec.






share|improve this answer























  • Unfortunately while the process will indeed not be killed, systemd will consider the unit to be failed in such a situation. This likely may not be what the OP would want.

    – Michał Politowski
    yesterday













1












1








1







This answer is primarily based on the documentation for systemd.kill. I'll see if I can do some actual tests with a service and update it accordingly.



The requirement here should be satisified by setting SendSIGKILL=no in your unit file. To allow the initial SIGTERM to be sent, you will likely need to restore the KillMode option to its default value, which is control-group.



With these settings, running systemctl stop machine.service should work like this:



  1. Because there are no ExecStop= commands specified in the unit file, a SIGTERM is sent to the process.


  2. After a period of 90 seconds (DefaultTimeoutStopSec), systemd considers terminating the process forcefully.


  3. Because SendSIGKILL is set to no, SIGKILL (FinalKillSignal) is not sent to the process, and the process continues running.


In effect, the only signal sent to the process on systemctl stop will be SIGTERM. Since the handling of SIGTERM is handled within the application itself, systemctl stop should work as intended: stops the application when the remote machine is down, times out when the remote machine is up.



As an additional note, the 90 seconds timeout can be configured with TimeoutStopSec.






share|improve this answer













This answer is primarily based on the documentation for systemd.kill. I'll see if I can do some actual tests with a service and update it accordingly.



The requirement here should be satisified by setting SendSIGKILL=no in your unit file. To allow the initial SIGTERM to be sent, you will likely need to restore the KillMode option to its default value, which is control-group.



With these settings, running systemctl stop machine.service should work like this:



  1. Because there are no ExecStop= commands specified in the unit file, a SIGTERM is sent to the process.


  2. After a period of 90 seconds (DefaultTimeoutStopSec), systemd considers terminating the process forcefully.


  3. Because SendSIGKILL is set to no, SIGKILL (FinalKillSignal) is not sent to the process, and the process continues running.


In effect, the only signal sent to the process on systemctl stop will be SIGTERM. Since the handling of SIGTERM is handled within the application itself, systemctl stop should work as intended: stops the application when the remote machine is down, times out when the remote machine is up.



As an additional note, the 90 seconds timeout can be configured with TimeoutStopSec.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered yesterday









HaxielHaxiel

3,41811021




3,41811021












  • Unfortunately while the process will indeed not be killed, systemd will consider the unit to be failed in such a situation. This likely may not be what the OP would want.

    – Michał Politowski
    yesterday

















  • Unfortunately while the process will indeed not be killed, systemd will consider the unit to be failed in such a situation. This likely may not be what the OP would want.

    – Michał Politowski
    yesterday
















Unfortunately while the process will indeed not be killed, systemd will consider the unit to be failed in such a situation. This likely may not be what the OP would want.

– Michał Politowski
yesterday





Unfortunately while the process will indeed not be killed, systemd will consider the unit to be failed in such a situation. This likely may not be what the OP would want.

– Michał Politowski
yesterday










Jan Jaap is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















Jan Jaap is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Jan Jaap is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Jan Jaap is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f508484%2fhave-systemd-not-kill-your-service-if-it-is-in-a-state-it-should-not-be-killed%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-linux, systemctl, systemd

Popular posts from this blog

Creating 100m^2 grid automatically using QGIS?Creating grid constrained within polygon in QGIS?Createing polygon layer from point data using QGIS?Creating vector grid using QGIS?Creating grid polygons from coordinates using R or PythonCreating grid from spatio temporal point data?Creating fields in attributes table using other layers using QGISCreate .shp vector grid in QGISQGIS Creating 4km point grid within polygonsCreate a vector grid over a raster layerVector Grid Creates just one grid

Nikolai Prilezhaev Bibliography References External links Navigation menuEarly Russian Organic Chemists and Their Legacy092774english translationRussian Biography

Why is this plane circling around the Lucknow airport every day?Why do aircraft on Flight Radar 24 jump around randomly sometimes?What airport has this walkway over a taxiway?How does Chicago O'Hare's tower sequence aircraft at peak capacity?Which airport is featured in this Delta commercial?After a crash, for how long is the airport closed?Can a passenger plane stand still in the air, or hover at a fixed location above a ground?What are those trucks towing around, and why?What is this airport outside of Cairo, Egypt?Which US airport has the lowest circling MDH?What is this airport video?