Have systemd not kill your service if it is in a state it should not be killedMake systemd reload only single openvpn process and not the whole grouphow does systemd determine service is stopped?Systemd - how service can determine first run from restart run?Why is systemd stopping service immediately after it is started?Instruct to execute an unit after completing another unit successfullysystemd: finish the execution of custom shell script before starting nginxStopping systemd unit together with another. Starting workssystemd doesn't recognize init.d statussystemd not autorestarting the last docker container after it crashes or kill -9 or docker stop serviceDoes systemctl consider service dependencies when starting or stopping multiple services in one command?

Curses work by shouting - How to avoid collateral damage?

What is difference between behavior and behaviour

What is the intuitive meaning of having a linear relationship between the logs of two variables?

What defines a dissertation?

Have I saved too much for retirement so far?

apt-get update is failing in debian

I'm in charge of equipment buying but no one's ever happy with what I choose. How to fix this?

Are there any comparative studies done between Ashtavakra Gita and Buddhim?

Implement the Thanos sorting algorithm

Valid Badminton Score?

How can I replace every global instance of "x[2]" with "x_2"

Failed to fetch jessie backports repository

Why "be dealt cards" rather than "be dealing cards"?

Where in the Bible does the greeting ("Dominus Vobiscum") used at Mass come from?

Is the destination of a commercial flight important for the pilot?

Go Pregnant or Go Home

Why is delta-v is the most useful quantity for planning space travel?

Efficiently merge handle parallel feature branches in SFDX

What to do with wrong results in talks?

How could Frankenstein get the parts for his _second_ creature?

Is there an Impartial Brexit Deal comparison site?

Minimal reference content

What will be the benefits of Brexit?

Teaching indefinite integrals that require special-casing



Have systemd not kill your service if it is in a state it should not be killed


Make systemd reload only single openvpn process and not the whole grouphow does systemd determine service is stopped?Systemd - how service can determine first run from restart run?Why is systemd stopping service immediately after it is started?Instruct to execute an unit after completing another unit successfullysystemd: finish the execution of custom shell script before starting nginxStopping systemd unit together with another. Starting workssystemd doesn't recognize init.d statussystemd not autorestarting the last docker container after it crashes or kill -9 or docker stop serviceDoes systemctl consider service dependencies when starting or stopping multiple services in one command?













3















I have a question regarding the configuration of a systemd service.



The service application is an application the controls a machine. Within the application the SIGINT, SIGTERM, SIGQUIT and SIGHUP are captured. When the machine is "RUNNING", these signals are ignored and the application is not exited. If the machine is in "STOPPED" mode, the controlling application is exited.



We want to boot this application together with Linux, so we added the application as a systemd service.



We have the following configuration so far:



[Unit]
Description=Machine control service
After=network.target

[Service]
Type=simple
User=simplemachine
Group=simplemachine
CPUSchedulingPolicy=other
LimitRTPRIO=80
LimitRTTIME=infinity

WorkingDirectory=/opt/simplemachine/bin/
ExecStart=/opt/simplemachine/bin/simplemachine
KillMode=none
Restart=always
RestartSec=10

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target


Now I have the following questions.
When I perform:



sudo systemctl stop machine.service


I would like systemctl to send a SIGTERM, this way the application is only stopped when it is allowed to stopped.
Also when the application does not stop. It would be nice that systemctl does not kill the process, but for example returns some kind of fault or timeout code meaning that it may not stop the process.



How can I achieve this with the new systemd system?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • That is just a shot in the dark, is ExecStop usefully in some way? for example by creating a shell script that will consider the importance of this(I am not very sure if systemd at end will not try to crazy stop your service). How can someone dislike this post. It is a genuine question.

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    yesterday
















3















I have a question regarding the configuration of a systemd service.



The service application is an application the controls a machine. Within the application the SIGINT, SIGTERM, SIGQUIT and SIGHUP are captured. When the machine is "RUNNING", these signals are ignored and the application is not exited. If the machine is in "STOPPED" mode, the controlling application is exited.



We want to boot this application together with Linux, so we added the application as a systemd service.



We have the following configuration so far:



[Unit]
Description=Machine control service
After=network.target

[Service]
Type=simple
User=simplemachine
Group=simplemachine
CPUSchedulingPolicy=other
LimitRTPRIO=80
LimitRTTIME=infinity

WorkingDirectory=/opt/simplemachine/bin/
ExecStart=/opt/simplemachine/bin/simplemachine
KillMode=none
Restart=always
RestartSec=10

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target


Now I have the following questions.
When I perform:



sudo systemctl stop machine.service


I would like systemctl to send a SIGTERM, this way the application is only stopped when it is allowed to stopped.
Also when the application does not stop. It would be nice that systemctl does not kill the process, but for example returns some kind of fault or timeout code meaning that it may not stop the process.



How can I achieve this with the new systemd system?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • That is just a shot in the dark, is ExecStop usefully in some way? for example by creating a shell script that will consider the importance of this(I am not very sure if systemd at end will not try to crazy stop your service). How can someone dislike this post. It is a genuine question.

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    yesterday














3












3








3


1






I have a question regarding the configuration of a systemd service.



The service application is an application the controls a machine. Within the application the SIGINT, SIGTERM, SIGQUIT and SIGHUP are captured. When the machine is "RUNNING", these signals are ignored and the application is not exited. If the machine is in "STOPPED" mode, the controlling application is exited.



We want to boot this application together with Linux, so we added the application as a systemd service.



We have the following configuration so far:



[Unit]
Description=Machine control service
After=network.target

[Service]
Type=simple
User=simplemachine
Group=simplemachine
CPUSchedulingPolicy=other
LimitRTPRIO=80
LimitRTTIME=infinity

WorkingDirectory=/opt/simplemachine/bin/
ExecStart=/opt/simplemachine/bin/simplemachine
KillMode=none
Restart=always
RestartSec=10

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target


Now I have the following questions.
When I perform:



sudo systemctl stop machine.service


I would like systemctl to send a SIGTERM, this way the application is only stopped when it is allowed to stopped.
Also when the application does not stop. It would be nice that systemctl does not kill the process, but for example returns some kind of fault or timeout code meaning that it may not stop the process.



How can I achieve this with the new systemd system?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I have a question regarding the configuration of a systemd service.



The service application is an application the controls a machine. Within the application the SIGINT, SIGTERM, SIGQUIT and SIGHUP are captured. When the machine is "RUNNING", these signals are ignored and the application is not exited. If the machine is in "STOPPED" mode, the controlling application is exited.



We want to boot this application together with Linux, so we added the application as a systemd service.



We have the following configuration so far:



[Unit]
Description=Machine control service
After=network.target

[Service]
Type=simple
User=simplemachine
Group=simplemachine
CPUSchedulingPolicy=other
LimitRTPRIO=80
LimitRTTIME=infinity

WorkingDirectory=/opt/simplemachine/bin/
ExecStart=/opt/simplemachine/bin/simplemachine
KillMode=none
Restart=always
RestartSec=10

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target


Now I have the following questions.
When I perform:



sudo systemctl stop machine.service


I would like systemctl to send a SIGTERM, this way the application is only stopped when it is allowed to stopped.
Also when the application does not stop. It would be nice that systemctl does not kill the process, but for example returns some kind of fault or timeout code meaning that it may not stop the process.



How can I achieve this with the new systemd system?







linux systemd systemctl






share|improve this question









New contributor




Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









Rui F Ribeiro

41.7k1483142




41.7k1483142






New contributor




Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Jan JaapJan Jaap

191




191




New contributor




Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • That is just a shot in the dark, is ExecStop usefully in some way? for example by creating a shell script that will consider the importance of this(I am not very sure if systemd at end will not try to crazy stop your service). How can someone dislike this post. It is a genuine question.

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    yesterday


















  • That is just a shot in the dark, is ExecStop usefully in some way? for example by creating a shell script that will consider the importance of this(I am not very sure if systemd at end will not try to crazy stop your service). How can someone dislike this post. It is a genuine question.

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    yesterday

















That is just a shot in the dark, is ExecStop usefully in some way? for example by creating a shell script that will consider the importance of this(I am not very sure if systemd at end will not try to crazy stop your service). How can someone dislike this post. It is a genuine question.

– Luciano Andress Martini
yesterday






That is just a shot in the dark, is ExecStop usefully in some way? for example by creating a shell script that will consider the importance of this(I am not very sure if systemd at end will not try to crazy stop your service). How can someone dislike this post. It is a genuine question.

– Luciano Andress Martini
yesterday











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














This answer is primarily based on the documentation for systemd.kill. I'll see if I can do some actual tests with a service and update it accordingly.



The requirement here should be satisified by setting SendSIGKILL=no in your unit file. To allow the initial SIGTERM to be sent, you will likely need to restore the KillMode option to its default value, which is control-group.



With these settings, running systemctl stop machine.service should work like this:



  1. Because there are no ExecStop= commands specified in the unit file, a SIGTERM is sent to the process.


  2. After a period of 90 seconds (DefaultTimeoutStopSec), systemd considers terminating the process forcefully.


  3. Because SendSIGKILL is set to no, SIGKILL (FinalKillSignal) is not sent to the process, and the process continues running.


In effect, the only signal sent to the process on systemctl stop will be SIGTERM. Since the handling of SIGTERM is handled within the application itself, systemctl stop should work as intended: stops the application when the remote machine is down, times out when the remote machine is up.



As an additional note, the 90 seconds timeout can be configured with TimeoutStopSec.






share|improve this answer























  • Unfortunately while the process will indeed not be killed, systemd will consider the unit to be failed in such a situation. This likely may not be what the OP would want.

    – Michał Politowski
    yesterday










Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Jan Jaap is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f508484%2fhave-systemd-not-kill-your-service-if-it-is-in-a-state-it-should-not-be-killed%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














This answer is primarily based on the documentation for systemd.kill. I'll see if I can do some actual tests with a service and update it accordingly.



The requirement here should be satisified by setting SendSIGKILL=no in your unit file. To allow the initial SIGTERM to be sent, you will likely need to restore the KillMode option to its default value, which is control-group.



With these settings, running systemctl stop machine.service should work like this:



  1. Because there are no ExecStop= commands specified in the unit file, a SIGTERM is sent to the process.


  2. After a period of 90 seconds (DefaultTimeoutStopSec), systemd considers terminating the process forcefully.


  3. Because SendSIGKILL is set to no, SIGKILL (FinalKillSignal) is not sent to the process, and the process continues running.


In effect, the only signal sent to the process on systemctl stop will be SIGTERM. Since the handling of SIGTERM is handled within the application itself, systemctl stop should work as intended: stops the application when the remote machine is down, times out when the remote machine is up.



As an additional note, the 90 seconds timeout can be configured with TimeoutStopSec.






share|improve this answer























  • Unfortunately while the process will indeed not be killed, systemd will consider the unit to be failed in such a situation. This likely may not be what the OP would want.

    – Michał Politowski
    yesterday















1














This answer is primarily based on the documentation for systemd.kill. I'll see if I can do some actual tests with a service and update it accordingly.



The requirement here should be satisified by setting SendSIGKILL=no in your unit file. To allow the initial SIGTERM to be sent, you will likely need to restore the KillMode option to its default value, which is control-group.



With these settings, running systemctl stop machine.service should work like this:



  1. Because there are no ExecStop= commands specified in the unit file, a SIGTERM is sent to the process.


  2. After a period of 90 seconds (DefaultTimeoutStopSec), systemd considers terminating the process forcefully.


  3. Because SendSIGKILL is set to no, SIGKILL (FinalKillSignal) is not sent to the process, and the process continues running.


In effect, the only signal sent to the process on systemctl stop will be SIGTERM. Since the handling of SIGTERM is handled within the application itself, systemctl stop should work as intended: stops the application when the remote machine is down, times out when the remote machine is up.



As an additional note, the 90 seconds timeout can be configured with TimeoutStopSec.






share|improve this answer























  • Unfortunately while the process will indeed not be killed, systemd will consider the unit to be failed in such a situation. This likely may not be what the OP would want.

    – Michał Politowski
    yesterday













1












1








1







This answer is primarily based on the documentation for systemd.kill. I'll see if I can do some actual tests with a service and update it accordingly.



The requirement here should be satisified by setting SendSIGKILL=no in your unit file. To allow the initial SIGTERM to be sent, you will likely need to restore the KillMode option to its default value, which is control-group.



With these settings, running systemctl stop machine.service should work like this:



  1. Because there are no ExecStop= commands specified in the unit file, a SIGTERM is sent to the process.


  2. After a period of 90 seconds (DefaultTimeoutStopSec), systemd considers terminating the process forcefully.


  3. Because SendSIGKILL is set to no, SIGKILL (FinalKillSignal) is not sent to the process, and the process continues running.


In effect, the only signal sent to the process on systemctl stop will be SIGTERM. Since the handling of SIGTERM is handled within the application itself, systemctl stop should work as intended: stops the application when the remote machine is down, times out when the remote machine is up.



As an additional note, the 90 seconds timeout can be configured with TimeoutStopSec.






share|improve this answer













This answer is primarily based on the documentation for systemd.kill. I'll see if I can do some actual tests with a service and update it accordingly.



The requirement here should be satisified by setting SendSIGKILL=no in your unit file. To allow the initial SIGTERM to be sent, you will likely need to restore the KillMode option to its default value, which is control-group.



With these settings, running systemctl stop machine.service should work like this:



  1. Because there are no ExecStop= commands specified in the unit file, a SIGTERM is sent to the process.


  2. After a period of 90 seconds (DefaultTimeoutStopSec), systemd considers terminating the process forcefully.


  3. Because SendSIGKILL is set to no, SIGKILL (FinalKillSignal) is not sent to the process, and the process continues running.


In effect, the only signal sent to the process on systemctl stop will be SIGTERM. Since the handling of SIGTERM is handled within the application itself, systemctl stop should work as intended: stops the application when the remote machine is down, times out when the remote machine is up.



As an additional note, the 90 seconds timeout can be configured with TimeoutStopSec.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered yesterday









HaxielHaxiel

3,41811021




3,41811021












  • Unfortunately while the process will indeed not be killed, systemd will consider the unit to be failed in such a situation. This likely may not be what the OP would want.

    – Michał Politowski
    yesterday

















  • Unfortunately while the process will indeed not be killed, systemd will consider the unit to be failed in such a situation. This likely may not be what the OP would want.

    – Michał Politowski
    yesterday
















Unfortunately while the process will indeed not be killed, systemd will consider the unit to be failed in such a situation. This likely may not be what the OP would want.

– Michał Politowski
yesterday





Unfortunately while the process will indeed not be killed, systemd will consider the unit to be failed in such a situation. This likely may not be what the OP would want.

– Michał Politowski
yesterday










Jan Jaap is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















Jan Jaap is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Jan Jaap is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Jan Jaap is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f508484%2fhave-systemd-not-kill-your-service-if-it-is-in-a-state-it-should-not-be-killed%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-linux, systemctl, systemd

Popular posts from this blog

Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god existsWord for having a definite opinion while simultaneously withholding judgment?What's the opposite of “newcomer? Is ”veteran" OK?What do you call an “atheist” who might believe in an afterlife?What's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Word for someone who dismisses contrary opinions as irrational?Somone who thinks they are overly special/out of the ordinaryIs there a word, phrase or idiom for “a person who is incapable of thinking about the future”?The belief that a god is human-likeA word for a non-famous person/thing you have heard a lot aboutAdjective for a person who enjoys taking care of their appearance

What was this official D&D 3.5e Lovecraft-flavored rulebook?What was this set of RPG tools called?As a first-time DM should I let my players play complex character classes and roles?Nymph's Kiss and the RelationshipWhat was the name of this Cleric Prestige Class that shapes metal with its bare hands?Are the 3.5e Dragonlance books third party or official works?What's up with the domain Vile Darkness?What was this 80s book about RPGs?What was the name of this Werewolf band?What book had Rituals to “upgrade” animal companions to keep them viable at higher levels?What was this RPG that had rules for player-owned businesses?

2017 IndyCar Series Contents Series news Teams and drivers Schedule Season summary Footnotes References External links Navigation menu"INDYCAR: Initial 2018 bodywork concepts unveiled"the original"IndyCar confirms switch to Performance Friction brakes in 2017""AJ Foyt Racing will switch to Chevy"the original"Carlos Munoz, Conor Daly will drive for AJ Foyt Racing""Zach Veach's Indy 500 Debut Confirmed with Foyt""No mass exodus from Honda after Ganassi switch""Ex-F1 driver Sato joins Andretti Autosport for 2017 IndyCar season""IndyCar's Ryan Hunter-Reay, sponsor DHL paired through 2020""hhgregg and Andretti Autosport announce partnership for key races in 2016""INDYCAR: Rossi re-signs with Andretti"the original"McLaren Formula 1 - Fernando Alonso to race at Indy 500 with McLaren, Honda and Andretti Autosport""Shank will finally take part in Indy 500 with Harvey, Andretti | MotorSportsTalk""Andretti adds Jack Harvey to Indy 500 field""Ganassi switches to Honda power for 2017""INDYCAR: Chilton returns to Ganassi"the original"IndyCar silly season: Who's going where in 2017?""INDYCAR: Kanaan, NTT Data return to Ganassi"the original"Kimball to remain at Ganassi for 2017""Coyne confirms Bourdais for 2017 IndyCar season""Davison to sub for Bourdais in Indy 500"the original"Gutierrez confirmed for Detroit IndyCar debut""Gutierrez returns with Coyne for rest of 2017 season""Vautier to drive for Coyne at Texas"the original"INDYCAR: Coyne confirms Jones for 2017"the original"Pippa Mann returns to Coyne for Indy 500""Karam, Dreyer & Reinbold teaming up again for Indianapolis 500""Pigot to return to Ed Carpenter Racing""Hildebrand confirmed as full-time Ed Carpenter driver""Veach to replace injured Hildebrand at Barber"the originalNew Team Harding Racing Enters Chaves for 101st Indianapolis 500"Juncos Racing Announces Entry in 101st Running of the Indianapolis 500 :: Juncos Racing""Juncos confirms Pigot for Indy 500""Saavedra confirmed in Juncos' second 500 entry"the original"Lazier confirms Indy 500 run after son's USF2000 debut"the original"Claman DeMelo to race for RLLR at Sonoma"the original"Rahal signs Servia and ace engineer for 2017""IndyCar: Aleshin returns with Schmidt"the original"Aleshin replaced by Saavedra for Toronto""Jack Harvey will pilot SPM No. 7 car at Watkins Glen, Sonoma""Jay Howard confirmed in Tony Stewart's supported SPM Indy entry""INDYCAR: Newgarden to wave the flag at Penske"the original"Pagenaud opts for No. 1 in 2017"the original"Penske confirms Newgarden for 2017""Montoya to stay with Team Penske in 2017""Target leaving IndyCar after 27 seasons with Chip Ganassi""Cavin: IndyCar could see complete driver/team shakeup in 2017""End of the road for KV Racing?""KV Racing confirms closure, equipment sold to Juncos""Juncos confirms IndyCar Series entry"the original"Juncos readies IndyCar program, aims for '17 500"the original"Harding Racing to add Texas, Pocono to schedule"the original"Sato signs with Andretti Autosport for 2017""INDYCAR: Aleshin in Doubt at SPM"the original"Long Beach notebook: JR Hildebrand breaks hand""Hildebrand cleared to return at Phoenix"the original"Bourdais to undergo surgery on multiple fractures""Aleshin loses Schmidt Peterson IndyCar ride""Saavedra in at SPM for Pocono, Gateway"the original"Bourdais to make return at Gateway"the original"The IndyCar Grand Prix no longer is sponsored by Angie's List""2017 IndyCar Series rulebook""2017 Verizon IndyCar Series Official Rulebook"Official websiteeeeee