Have systemd not kill your service if it is in a state it should not be killedMake systemd reload only single openvpn process and not the whole grouphow does systemd determine service is stopped?Systemd - how service can determine first run from restart run?Why is systemd stopping service immediately after it is started?Instruct to execute an unit after completing another unit successfullysystemd: finish the execution of custom shell script before starting nginxStopping systemd unit together with another. Starting workssystemd doesn't recognize init.d statussystemd not autorestarting the last docker container after it crashes or kill -9 or docker stop serviceDoes systemctl consider service dependencies when starting or stopping multiple services in one command?
Curses work by shouting - How to avoid collateral damage?
What is difference between behavior and behaviour
What is the intuitive meaning of having a linear relationship between the logs of two variables?
What defines a dissertation?
Have I saved too much for retirement so far?
apt-get update is failing in debian
I'm in charge of equipment buying but no one's ever happy with what I choose. How to fix this?
Are there any comparative studies done between Ashtavakra Gita and Buddhim?
Implement the Thanos sorting algorithm
Valid Badminton Score?
How can I replace every global instance of "x[2]" with "x_2"
Failed to fetch jessie backports repository
Why "be dealt cards" rather than "be dealing cards"?
Where in the Bible does the greeting ("Dominus Vobiscum") used at Mass come from?
Is the destination of a commercial flight important for the pilot?
Go Pregnant or Go Home
Why is delta-v is the most useful quantity for planning space travel?
Efficiently merge handle parallel feature branches in SFDX
What to do with wrong results in talks?
How could Frankenstein get the parts for his _second_ creature?
Is there an Impartial Brexit Deal comparison site?
Minimal reference content
What will be the benefits of Brexit?
Teaching indefinite integrals that require special-casing
Have systemd not kill your service if it is in a state it should not be killed
Make systemd reload only single openvpn process and not the whole grouphow does systemd determine service is stopped?Systemd - how service can determine first run from restart run?Why is systemd stopping service immediately after it is started?Instruct to execute an unit after completing another unit successfullysystemd: finish the execution of custom shell script before starting nginxStopping systemd unit together with another. Starting workssystemd doesn't recognize init.d statussystemd not autorestarting the last docker container after it crashes or kill -9 or docker stop serviceDoes systemctl consider service dependencies when starting or stopping multiple services in one command?
I have a question regarding the configuration of a systemd service.
The service application is an application the controls a machine. Within the application the SIGINT, SIGTERM, SIGQUIT and SIGHUP are captured. When the machine is "RUNNING", these signals are ignored and the application is not exited. If the machine is in "STOPPED" mode, the controlling application is exited.
We want to boot this application together with Linux, so we added the application as a systemd service.
We have the following configuration so far:
[Unit]
Description=Machine control service
After=network.target
[Service]
Type=simple
User=simplemachine
Group=simplemachine
CPUSchedulingPolicy=other
LimitRTPRIO=80
LimitRTTIME=infinity
WorkingDirectory=/opt/simplemachine/bin/
ExecStart=/opt/simplemachine/bin/simplemachine
KillMode=none
Restart=always
RestartSec=10
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
Now I have the following questions.
When I perform:
sudo systemctl stop machine.service
I would like systemctl to send a SIGTERM, this way the application is only stopped when it is allowed to stopped.
Also when the application does not stop. It would be nice that systemctl does not kill the process, but for example returns some kind of fault or timeout code meaning that it may not stop the process.
How can I achieve this with the new systemd system?
linux systemd systemctl
New contributor
Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I have a question regarding the configuration of a systemd service.
The service application is an application the controls a machine. Within the application the SIGINT, SIGTERM, SIGQUIT and SIGHUP are captured. When the machine is "RUNNING", these signals are ignored and the application is not exited. If the machine is in "STOPPED" mode, the controlling application is exited.
We want to boot this application together with Linux, so we added the application as a systemd service.
We have the following configuration so far:
[Unit]
Description=Machine control service
After=network.target
[Service]
Type=simple
User=simplemachine
Group=simplemachine
CPUSchedulingPolicy=other
LimitRTPRIO=80
LimitRTTIME=infinity
WorkingDirectory=/opt/simplemachine/bin/
ExecStart=/opt/simplemachine/bin/simplemachine
KillMode=none
Restart=always
RestartSec=10
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
Now I have the following questions.
When I perform:
sudo systemctl stop machine.service
I would like systemctl to send a SIGTERM, this way the application is only stopped when it is allowed to stopped.
Also when the application does not stop. It would be nice that systemctl does not kill the process, but for example returns some kind of fault or timeout code meaning that it may not stop the process.
How can I achieve this with the new systemd system?
linux systemd systemctl
New contributor
Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
That is just a shot in the dark, is ExecStop usefully in some way? for example by creating a shell script that will consider the importance of this(I am not very sure if systemd at end will not try to crazy stop your service). How can someone dislike this post. It is a genuine question.
– Luciano Andress Martini
yesterday
add a comment |
I have a question regarding the configuration of a systemd service.
The service application is an application the controls a machine. Within the application the SIGINT, SIGTERM, SIGQUIT and SIGHUP are captured. When the machine is "RUNNING", these signals are ignored and the application is not exited. If the machine is in "STOPPED" mode, the controlling application is exited.
We want to boot this application together with Linux, so we added the application as a systemd service.
We have the following configuration so far:
[Unit]
Description=Machine control service
After=network.target
[Service]
Type=simple
User=simplemachine
Group=simplemachine
CPUSchedulingPolicy=other
LimitRTPRIO=80
LimitRTTIME=infinity
WorkingDirectory=/opt/simplemachine/bin/
ExecStart=/opt/simplemachine/bin/simplemachine
KillMode=none
Restart=always
RestartSec=10
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
Now I have the following questions.
When I perform:
sudo systemctl stop machine.service
I would like systemctl to send a SIGTERM, this way the application is only stopped when it is allowed to stopped.
Also when the application does not stop. It would be nice that systemctl does not kill the process, but for example returns some kind of fault or timeout code meaning that it may not stop the process.
How can I achieve this with the new systemd system?
linux systemd systemctl
New contributor
Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I have a question regarding the configuration of a systemd service.
The service application is an application the controls a machine. Within the application the SIGINT, SIGTERM, SIGQUIT and SIGHUP are captured. When the machine is "RUNNING", these signals are ignored and the application is not exited. If the machine is in "STOPPED" mode, the controlling application is exited.
We want to boot this application together with Linux, so we added the application as a systemd service.
We have the following configuration so far:
[Unit]
Description=Machine control service
After=network.target
[Service]
Type=simple
User=simplemachine
Group=simplemachine
CPUSchedulingPolicy=other
LimitRTPRIO=80
LimitRTTIME=infinity
WorkingDirectory=/opt/simplemachine/bin/
ExecStart=/opt/simplemachine/bin/simplemachine
KillMode=none
Restart=always
RestartSec=10
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
Now I have the following questions.
When I perform:
sudo systemctl stop machine.service
I would like systemctl to send a SIGTERM, this way the application is only stopped when it is allowed to stopped.
Also when the application does not stop. It would be nice that systemctl does not kill the process, but for example returns some kind of fault or timeout code meaning that it may not stop the process.
How can I achieve this with the new systemd system?
linux systemd systemctl
linux systemd systemctl
New contributor
Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited yesterday
Rui F Ribeiro
41.7k1483142
41.7k1483142
New contributor
Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked yesterday
Jan JaapJan Jaap
191
191
New contributor
Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Jan Jaap is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
That is just a shot in the dark, is ExecStop usefully in some way? for example by creating a shell script that will consider the importance of this(I am not very sure if systemd at end will not try to crazy stop your service). How can someone dislike this post. It is a genuine question.
– Luciano Andress Martini
yesterday
add a comment |
That is just a shot in the dark, is ExecStop usefully in some way? for example by creating a shell script that will consider the importance of this(I am not very sure if systemd at end will not try to crazy stop your service). How can someone dislike this post. It is a genuine question.
– Luciano Andress Martini
yesterday
That is just a shot in the dark, is ExecStop usefully in some way? for example by creating a shell script that will consider the importance of this(I am not very sure if systemd at end will not try to crazy stop your service). How can someone dislike this post. It is a genuine question.
– Luciano Andress Martini
yesterday
That is just a shot in the dark, is ExecStop usefully in some way? for example by creating a shell script that will consider the importance of this(I am not very sure if systemd at end will not try to crazy stop your service). How can someone dislike this post. It is a genuine question.
– Luciano Andress Martini
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
This answer is primarily based on the documentation for systemd.kill. I'll see if I can do some actual tests with a service and update it accordingly.
The requirement here should be satisified by setting SendSIGKILL=no in your unit file. To allow the initial SIGTERM to be sent, you will likely need to restore the KillMode option to its default value, which is control-group.
With these settings, running systemctl stop machine.service should work like this:
Because there are no
ExecStop=commands specified in the unit file, aSIGTERMis sent to the process.After a period of 90 seconds (
DefaultTimeoutStopSec),systemdconsiders terminating the process forcefully.Because
SendSIGKILLis set tono,SIGKILL(FinalKillSignal) is not sent to the process, and the process continues running.
In effect, the only signal sent to the process on systemctl stop will be SIGTERM. Since the handling of SIGTERM is handled within the application itself, systemctl stop should work as intended: stops the application when the remote machine is down, times out when the remote machine is up.
As an additional note, the 90 seconds timeout can be configured with TimeoutStopSec.
Unfortunately while the process will indeed not be killed, systemd will consider the unit to be failed in such a situation. This likely may not be what the OP would want.
– Michał Politowski
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Jan Jaap is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f508484%2fhave-systemd-not-kill-your-service-if-it-is-in-a-state-it-should-not-be-killed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This answer is primarily based on the documentation for systemd.kill. I'll see if I can do some actual tests with a service and update it accordingly.
The requirement here should be satisified by setting SendSIGKILL=no in your unit file. To allow the initial SIGTERM to be sent, you will likely need to restore the KillMode option to its default value, which is control-group.
With these settings, running systemctl stop machine.service should work like this:
Because there are no
ExecStop=commands specified in the unit file, aSIGTERMis sent to the process.After a period of 90 seconds (
DefaultTimeoutStopSec),systemdconsiders terminating the process forcefully.Because
SendSIGKILLis set tono,SIGKILL(FinalKillSignal) is not sent to the process, and the process continues running.
In effect, the only signal sent to the process on systemctl stop will be SIGTERM. Since the handling of SIGTERM is handled within the application itself, systemctl stop should work as intended: stops the application when the remote machine is down, times out when the remote machine is up.
As an additional note, the 90 seconds timeout can be configured with TimeoutStopSec.
Unfortunately while the process will indeed not be killed, systemd will consider the unit to be failed in such a situation. This likely may not be what the OP would want.
– Michał Politowski
yesterday
add a comment |
This answer is primarily based on the documentation for systemd.kill. I'll see if I can do some actual tests with a service and update it accordingly.
The requirement here should be satisified by setting SendSIGKILL=no in your unit file. To allow the initial SIGTERM to be sent, you will likely need to restore the KillMode option to its default value, which is control-group.
With these settings, running systemctl stop machine.service should work like this:
Because there are no
ExecStop=commands specified in the unit file, aSIGTERMis sent to the process.After a period of 90 seconds (
DefaultTimeoutStopSec),systemdconsiders terminating the process forcefully.Because
SendSIGKILLis set tono,SIGKILL(FinalKillSignal) is not sent to the process, and the process continues running.
In effect, the only signal sent to the process on systemctl stop will be SIGTERM. Since the handling of SIGTERM is handled within the application itself, systemctl stop should work as intended: stops the application when the remote machine is down, times out when the remote machine is up.
As an additional note, the 90 seconds timeout can be configured with TimeoutStopSec.
Unfortunately while the process will indeed not be killed, systemd will consider the unit to be failed in such a situation. This likely may not be what the OP would want.
– Michał Politowski
yesterday
add a comment |
This answer is primarily based on the documentation for systemd.kill. I'll see if I can do some actual tests with a service and update it accordingly.
The requirement here should be satisified by setting SendSIGKILL=no in your unit file. To allow the initial SIGTERM to be sent, you will likely need to restore the KillMode option to its default value, which is control-group.
With these settings, running systemctl stop machine.service should work like this:
Because there are no
ExecStop=commands specified in the unit file, aSIGTERMis sent to the process.After a period of 90 seconds (
DefaultTimeoutStopSec),systemdconsiders terminating the process forcefully.Because
SendSIGKILLis set tono,SIGKILL(FinalKillSignal) is not sent to the process, and the process continues running.
In effect, the only signal sent to the process on systemctl stop will be SIGTERM. Since the handling of SIGTERM is handled within the application itself, systemctl stop should work as intended: stops the application when the remote machine is down, times out when the remote machine is up.
As an additional note, the 90 seconds timeout can be configured with TimeoutStopSec.
This answer is primarily based on the documentation for systemd.kill. I'll see if I can do some actual tests with a service and update it accordingly.
The requirement here should be satisified by setting SendSIGKILL=no in your unit file. To allow the initial SIGTERM to be sent, you will likely need to restore the KillMode option to its default value, which is control-group.
With these settings, running systemctl stop machine.service should work like this:
Because there are no
ExecStop=commands specified in the unit file, aSIGTERMis sent to the process.After a period of 90 seconds (
DefaultTimeoutStopSec),systemdconsiders terminating the process forcefully.Because
SendSIGKILLis set tono,SIGKILL(FinalKillSignal) is not sent to the process, and the process continues running.
In effect, the only signal sent to the process on systemctl stop will be SIGTERM. Since the handling of SIGTERM is handled within the application itself, systemctl stop should work as intended: stops the application when the remote machine is down, times out when the remote machine is up.
As an additional note, the 90 seconds timeout can be configured with TimeoutStopSec.
answered yesterday
HaxielHaxiel
3,41811021
3,41811021
Unfortunately while the process will indeed not be killed, systemd will consider the unit to be failed in such a situation. This likely may not be what the OP would want.
– Michał Politowski
yesterday
add a comment |
Unfortunately while the process will indeed not be killed, systemd will consider the unit to be failed in such a situation. This likely may not be what the OP would want.
– Michał Politowski
yesterday
Unfortunately while the process will indeed not be killed, systemd will consider the unit to be failed in such a situation. This likely may not be what the OP would want.
– Michał Politowski
yesterday
Unfortunately while the process will indeed not be killed, systemd will consider the unit to be failed in such a situation. This likely may not be what the OP would want.
– Michał Politowski
yesterday
add a comment |
Jan Jaap is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jan Jaap is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jan Jaap is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jan Jaap is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f508484%2fhave-systemd-not-kill-your-service-if-it-is-in-a-state-it-should-not-be-killed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
-linux, systemctl, systemd
That is just a shot in the dark, is ExecStop usefully in some way? for example by creating a shell script that will consider the importance of this(I am not very sure if systemd at end will not try to crazy stop your service). How can someone dislike this post. It is a genuine question.
– Luciano Andress Martini
yesterday