NIntegrate: How can I solve this integral numerically? NIntegrate fails while Integrate worksNIntegrate fails while Integrate worksCauchy principal value integral of a list of numbers. How?How to numerically integrate this integral?How to do multi-dimensional principal value integration?How to calculate the principal value for a two-dimensional integral numerically?Interesting discrepencies between integrate functionsHow to overcome this error in NIntegrate?Divergence With NIntegrateEvaluating this double integral numerically using NIntegrateNIntegrate error message: “The integrand…has evaluated to non-numerical values for all sampling points in the region with boundaries…”

Trouble understanding overseas colleagues

Was Spock the First Vulcan in Starfleet?

Why is delta-v is the most useful quantity for planning space travel?

Increase performance creating Mandelbrot set in python

(Bedrock Edition) Loading more than six chunks at once

How can I use the arrow sign in my bash prompt?

Personal Teleportation as a Weapon

Do there exist finite commutative rings with identity that are not Bézout rings?

What would happen if the UK refused to take part in EU Parliamentary elections?

Tiptoe or tiphoof? Adjusting words to better fit fantasy races

when is out of tune ok?

There is only s̶i̶x̶t̶y one place he can be

Modify casing of marked letters

Is there any easy technique written in Bhagavad GITA to control lust?

How do I rename a LINUX host without needing to reboot for the rename to take effect?

Was the picture area of a CRT a parallelogram (instead of a true rectangle)?

Is a roofing delivery truck likely to crack my driveway slab?

Implement the Thanos sorting algorithm

How does residential electricity work?

Why Were Madagascar and New Zealand Discovered So Late?

Prove that a horizontal asymptote can never be crossed

Is there a problem with hiding "forgot password" until it's needed?

Valid Badminton Score?

Can I use my Chinese passport to enter China after I acquired another citizenship?



NIntegrate: How can I solve this integral numerically? NIntegrate fails while Integrate works


NIntegrate fails while Integrate worksCauchy principal value integral of a list of numbers. How?How to numerically integrate this integral?How to do multi-dimensional principal value integration?How to calculate the principal value for a two-dimensional integral numerically?Interesting discrepencies between integrate functionsHow to overcome this error in NIntegrate?Divergence With NIntegrateEvaluating this double integral numerically using NIntegrateNIntegrate error message: “The integrand…has evaluated to non-numerical values for all sampling points in the region with boundaries…”













4












$begingroup$


I know the exact solution of the principal value of this integral is equal to zero:



$int_-1^1int_-1^1fracx^2sqrt1-x^2fracsqrt1-y^2y-xdydx=0$



doing:



Integrate[x^2/Sqrt[1 - x^2] Sqrt[1 - y^2]/(y - x), x, -1, 1, y, -1, 1, 
PrincipalValue -> True]


but I want to do it numerically and it doesn't work:



NIntegrate[x^2/Sqrt[1 - x^2] Sqrt[1 - y^2]/(y - x), x, -1, 1, y, -1, 1]


This is the error message returned:



enter image description here



How can I get Mathematica to solve this problem numerically?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Javier Alaminos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The issue is that the integrand approaches infinity as x->±1, x->y, and y->x. That kind of behavior is toxic to numerical methods: you need to reason out a way to deal with it, not merely probe it numerically. PrincipalValue -> True gives you access to automated reasoning in this case, and you've solved the problem that way. Do you have a different problem you're trying to solve?
    $endgroup$
    – John Doty
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, I'm trying to solve a similar integral, when x^2 is multplied by exp^(-i*b*(x + y)). So, firstly I wanted to try to solve this known integral.
    $endgroup$
    – Javier Alaminos
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Use option Exclusions -> -1, 1, y + x == 0]
    $endgroup$
    – user18792
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    All that is built on the sand because the PrincipalValue option for multivariate integrals is undocumented.
    $endgroup$
    – user64494
    yesterday















4












$begingroup$


I know the exact solution of the principal value of this integral is equal to zero:



$int_-1^1int_-1^1fracx^2sqrt1-x^2fracsqrt1-y^2y-xdydx=0$



doing:



Integrate[x^2/Sqrt[1 - x^2] Sqrt[1 - y^2]/(y - x), x, -1, 1, y, -1, 1, 
PrincipalValue -> True]


but I want to do it numerically and it doesn't work:



NIntegrate[x^2/Sqrt[1 - x^2] Sqrt[1 - y^2]/(y - x), x, -1, 1, y, -1, 1]


This is the error message returned:



enter image description here



How can I get Mathematica to solve this problem numerically?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Javier Alaminos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The issue is that the integrand approaches infinity as x->±1, x->y, and y->x. That kind of behavior is toxic to numerical methods: you need to reason out a way to deal with it, not merely probe it numerically. PrincipalValue -> True gives you access to automated reasoning in this case, and you've solved the problem that way. Do you have a different problem you're trying to solve?
    $endgroup$
    – John Doty
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, I'm trying to solve a similar integral, when x^2 is multplied by exp^(-i*b*(x + y)). So, firstly I wanted to try to solve this known integral.
    $endgroup$
    – Javier Alaminos
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Use option Exclusions -> -1, 1, y + x == 0]
    $endgroup$
    – user18792
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    All that is built on the sand because the PrincipalValue option for multivariate integrals is undocumented.
    $endgroup$
    – user64494
    yesterday













4












4








4





$begingroup$


I know the exact solution of the principal value of this integral is equal to zero:



$int_-1^1int_-1^1fracx^2sqrt1-x^2fracsqrt1-y^2y-xdydx=0$



doing:



Integrate[x^2/Sqrt[1 - x^2] Sqrt[1 - y^2]/(y - x), x, -1, 1, y, -1, 1, 
PrincipalValue -> True]


but I want to do it numerically and it doesn't work:



NIntegrate[x^2/Sqrt[1 - x^2] Sqrt[1 - y^2]/(y - x), x, -1, 1, y, -1, 1]


This is the error message returned:



enter image description here



How can I get Mathematica to solve this problem numerically?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Javier Alaminos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I know the exact solution of the principal value of this integral is equal to zero:



$int_-1^1int_-1^1fracx^2sqrt1-x^2fracsqrt1-y^2y-xdydx=0$



doing:



Integrate[x^2/Sqrt[1 - x^2] Sqrt[1 - y^2]/(y - x), x, -1, 1, y, -1, 1, 
PrincipalValue -> True]


but I want to do it numerically and it doesn't work:



NIntegrate[x^2/Sqrt[1 - x^2] Sqrt[1 - y^2]/(y - x), x, -1, 1, y, -1, 1]


This is the error message returned:



enter image description here



How can I get Mathematica to solve this problem numerically?







numerical-integration






share|improve this question









New contributor




Javier Alaminos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Javier Alaminos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









mjw

1,03710




1,03710






New contributor




Javier Alaminos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Javier AlaminosJavier Alaminos

213




213




New contributor




Javier Alaminos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Javier Alaminos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Javier Alaminos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The issue is that the integrand approaches infinity as x->±1, x->y, and y->x. That kind of behavior is toxic to numerical methods: you need to reason out a way to deal with it, not merely probe it numerically. PrincipalValue -> True gives you access to automated reasoning in this case, and you've solved the problem that way. Do you have a different problem you're trying to solve?
    $endgroup$
    – John Doty
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, I'm trying to solve a similar integral, when x^2 is multplied by exp^(-i*b*(x + y)). So, firstly I wanted to try to solve this known integral.
    $endgroup$
    – Javier Alaminos
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Use option Exclusions -> -1, 1, y + x == 0]
    $endgroup$
    – user18792
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    All that is built on the sand because the PrincipalValue option for multivariate integrals is undocumented.
    $endgroup$
    – user64494
    yesterday












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The issue is that the integrand approaches infinity as x->±1, x->y, and y->x. That kind of behavior is toxic to numerical methods: you need to reason out a way to deal with it, not merely probe it numerically. PrincipalValue -> True gives you access to automated reasoning in this case, and you've solved the problem that way. Do you have a different problem you're trying to solve?
    $endgroup$
    – John Doty
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, I'm trying to solve a similar integral, when x^2 is multplied by exp^(-i*b*(x + y)). So, firstly I wanted to try to solve this known integral.
    $endgroup$
    – Javier Alaminos
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Use option Exclusions -> -1, 1, y + x == 0]
    $endgroup$
    – user18792
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    All that is built on the sand because the PrincipalValue option for multivariate integrals is undocumented.
    $endgroup$
    – user64494
    yesterday







1




1




$begingroup$
The issue is that the integrand approaches infinity as x->±1, x->y, and y->x. That kind of behavior is toxic to numerical methods: you need to reason out a way to deal with it, not merely probe it numerically. PrincipalValue -> True gives you access to automated reasoning in this case, and you've solved the problem that way. Do you have a different problem you're trying to solve?
$endgroup$
– John Doty
yesterday




$begingroup$
The issue is that the integrand approaches infinity as x->±1, x->y, and y->x. That kind of behavior is toxic to numerical methods: you need to reason out a way to deal with it, not merely probe it numerically. PrincipalValue -> True gives you access to automated reasoning in this case, and you've solved the problem that way. Do you have a different problem you're trying to solve?
$endgroup$
– John Doty
yesterday












$begingroup$
Yes, I'm trying to solve a similar integral, when x^2 is multplied by exp^(-i*b*(x + y)). So, firstly I wanted to try to solve this known integral.
$endgroup$
– Javier Alaminos
yesterday




$begingroup$
Yes, I'm trying to solve a similar integral, when x^2 is multplied by exp^(-i*b*(x + y)). So, firstly I wanted to try to solve this known integral.
$endgroup$
– Javier Alaminos
yesterday




2




2




$begingroup$
Use option Exclusions -> -1, 1, y + x == 0]
$endgroup$
– user18792
yesterday




$begingroup$
Use option Exclusions -> -1, 1, y + x == 0]
$endgroup$
– user18792
yesterday












$begingroup$
All that is built on the sand because the PrincipalValue option for multivariate integrals is undocumented.
$endgroup$
– user64494
yesterday




$begingroup$
All that is built on the sand because the PrincipalValue option for multivariate integrals is undocumented.
$endgroup$
– user64494
yesterday










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

The main problem is the point x=y. In principle, it seems that there the integral is singular. If you agree to get the principal value of it, you may exclude this point by a regularization as follows



NIntegrate[
x^2/Sqrt[1 - x^2] Sqrt[1 - y^2]/Sqrt[(y - x)^2 + i^-2], x, -1 + 1/i,
1 - 1/i, y, -1 + 1/i, 1 - 1/i, Method -> "AdaptiveMonteCarlo"]


where i is a large number. Then you may increase i and check the convergence of the integral:



 lst = Table[1/i, 
NIntegrate[
x^2/Sqrt[1 - x^2] Sqrt[1 - y^2]/
Sqrt[(y - x)^2 + i^-2], x, -1 + 1/i, 1 - 1/i, y, -1 + 1/i,
1 - 1/i, Method -> "AdaptiveMonteCarlo"], i, 1000, 100000,
1000] // N;

ListLogPlot[lst /. x_, y_ -> 1/x, y, Frame -> True,
FrameLabel -> Style["Number i", 16], Style["Integral", 16]]


yielding this



enter image description here



One can further a few other methods which may eventually enable a more accurate estimate of the integral.



Have fun!






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I don't understand what you're plotting. The value of this integral is 0 and your result is around 12.
    $endgroup$
    – Javier Alaminos
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    You are right, it is not the same integral, since I took Sqrt[(x-y)^2+eps^2] instead of x-y.
    $endgroup$
    – Alexei Boulbitch
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    So, to solve the original integral what do I have to do?
    $endgroup$
    – Javier Alaminos
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Note that $sqrt(y-x)^2 + epsilon^2$ approaches $|y - x|$ as $epsilon to 0$, not the $y - x$ that's in the original integrand.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Seifert
    yesterday



















2












$begingroup$

As the others say,simply integrate by avoiding singular points?



Fixed.



Try other integral.




target = Compile[x, _Real, y, _Real, 
x/[Sqrt](1 - x) [Sqrt](1 - y^2)/(y - x)];
integrand[x_, y_] := If[Or[(1 - x) == 0, y == x], 0, target[x, y]];
Quiet@NIntegrate[integrand[x, y], x, -1., 1., y, -1., 1.]


=>



-4.06259



Integration by manual




.



Plus @@ Flatten@
Table[integrand[x, y]*0.001*0.001, x, -1., 1., 0.001, y, -1., 1.,
0.001]


=>



-3.99866



Integration by NIntegrate




N@Integrate[
x/Sqrt[1 - x] Sqrt[1 - y^2]/(y - x), x, -1, 1, y, -1, 1,
PrincipalValue -> True]


=>



-4.14669



the question's integral.



target = Compile[x, _Real, y, _Real, 
x^2/[Sqrt](1 - x^2) [Sqrt](1 - y^2)/(y - x)];
integrand[x_, y_] := If[Or[(1 - x^2) == 0, y == x], 0, target[x, y]];
Quiet@NIntegrate[integrand[x, y], x, -1., 1., y, -1., 1.]


=>



-0.4542



By manual.




Plus @@ Flatten@
Table[integrand[x, y]*0.1*0.1, x, -1., 1., 0.1, y, -1., 1., 0.1]


=>



-8.88178*10^-16



By other method.




Quiet@NIntegrate[integrand[x, y], x, -1., 1., y, -1., 1., 
Method -> "LocalAdaptive"]


=>



7.73766*10^-17


For now, we can see that the integral value is close to zero.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    But I can't avoid the singularity $x==y$, because for example if I have $x$ instead of $x^2$ the result of integral is $-pi^2/2$, and with your code the result is always 0.
    $endgroup$
    – Javier Alaminos
    yesterday











  • $begingroup$
    @JavierAlaminos as your point,my code was always 0. it's mainly because my code returns Nothing when the condition met,I think. so just modified.
    $endgroup$
    – Xminer
    yesterday










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Javier Alaminos is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193926%2fnintegrate-how-can-i-solve-this-integral-numerically-nintegrate-fails-while-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

The main problem is the point x=y. In principle, it seems that there the integral is singular. If you agree to get the principal value of it, you may exclude this point by a regularization as follows



NIntegrate[
x^2/Sqrt[1 - x^2] Sqrt[1 - y^2]/Sqrt[(y - x)^2 + i^-2], x, -1 + 1/i,
1 - 1/i, y, -1 + 1/i, 1 - 1/i, Method -> "AdaptiveMonteCarlo"]


where i is a large number. Then you may increase i and check the convergence of the integral:



 lst = Table[1/i, 
NIntegrate[
x^2/Sqrt[1 - x^2] Sqrt[1 - y^2]/
Sqrt[(y - x)^2 + i^-2], x, -1 + 1/i, 1 - 1/i, y, -1 + 1/i,
1 - 1/i, Method -> "AdaptiveMonteCarlo"], i, 1000, 100000,
1000] // N;

ListLogPlot[lst /. x_, y_ -> 1/x, y, Frame -> True,
FrameLabel -> Style["Number i", 16], Style["Integral", 16]]


yielding this



enter image description here



One can further a few other methods which may eventually enable a more accurate estimate of the integral.



Have fun!






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I don't understand what you're plotting. The value of this integral is 0 and your result is around 12.
    $endgroup$
    – Javier Alaminos
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    You are right, it is not the same integral, since I took Sqrt[(x-y)^2+eps^2] instead of x-y.
    $endgroup$
    – Alexei Boulbitch
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    So, to solve the original integral what do I have to do?
    $endgroup$
    – Javier Alaminos
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Note that $sqrt(y-x)^2 + epsilon^2$ approaches $|y - x|$ as $epsilon to 0$, not the $y - x$ that's in the original integrand.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Seifert
    yesterday
















2












$begingroup$

The main problem is the point x=y. In principle, it seems that there the integral is singular. If you agree to get the principal value of it, you may exclude this point by a regularization as follows



NIntegrate[
x^2/Sqrt[1 - x^2] Sqrt[1 - y^2]/Sqrt[(y - x)^2 + i^-2], x, -1 + 1/i,
1 - 1/i, y, -1 + 1/i, 1 - 1/i, Method -> "AdaptiveMonteCarlo"]


where i is a large number. Then you may increase i and check the convergence of the integral:



 lst = Table[1/i, 
NIntegrate[
x^2/Sqrt[1 - x^2] Sqrt[1 - y^2]/
Sqrt[(y - x)^2 + i^-2], x, -1 + 1/i, 1 - 1/i, y, -1 + 1/i,
1 - 1/i, Method -> "AdaptiveMonteCarlo"], i, 1000, 100000,
1000] // N;

ListLogPlot[lst /. x_, y_ -> 1/x, y, Frame -> True,
FrameLabel -> Style["Number i", 16], Style["Integral", 16]]


yielding this



enter image description here



One can further a few other methods which may eventually enable a more accurate estimate of the integral.



Have fun!






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I don't understand what you're plotting. The value of this integral is 0 and your result is around 12.
    $endgroup$
    – Javier Alaminos
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    You are right, it is not the same integral, since I took Sqrt[(x-y)^2+eps^2] instead of x-y.
    $endgroup$
    – Alexei Boulbitch
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    So, to solve the original integral what do I have to do?
    $endgroup$
    – Javier Alaminos
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Note that $sqrt(y-x)^2 + epsilon^2$ approaches $|y - x|$ as $epsilon to 0$, not the $y - x$ that's in the original integrand.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Seifert
    yesterday














2












2








2





$begingroup$

The main problem is the point x=y. In principle, it seems that there the integral is singular. If you agree to get the principal value of it, you may exclude this point by a regularization as follows



NIntegrate[
x^2/Sqrt[1 - x^2] Sqrt[1 - y^2]/Sqrt[(y - x)^2 + i^-2], x, -1 + 1/i,
1 - 1/i, y, -1 + 1/i, 1 - 1/i, Method -> "AdaptiveMonteCarlo"]


where i is a large number. Then you may increase i and check the convergence of the integral:



 lst = Table[1/i, 
NIntegrate[
x^2/Sqrt[1 - x^2] Sqrt[1 - y^2]/
Sqrt[(y - x)^2 + i^-2], x, -1 + 1/i, 1 - 1/i, y, -1 + 1/i,
1 - 1/i, Method -> "AdaptiveMonteCarlo"], i, 1000, 100000,
1000] // N;

ListLogPlot[lst /. x_, y_ -> 1/x, y, Frame -> True,
FrameLabel -> Style["Number i", 16], Style["Integral", 16]]


yielding this



enter image description here



One can further a few other methods which may eventually enable a more accurate estimate of the integral.



Have fun!






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The main problem is the point x=y. In principle, it seems that there the integral is singular. If you agree to get the principal value of it, you may exclude this point by a regularization as follows



NIntegrate[
x^2/Sqrt[1 - x^2] Sqrt[1 - y^2]/Sqrt[(y - x)^2 + i^-2], x, -1 + 1/i,
1 - 1/i, y, -1 + 1/i, 1 - 1/i, Method -> "AdaptiveMonteCarlo"]


where i is a large number. Then you may increase i and check the convergence of the integral:



 lst = Table[1/i, 
NIntegrate[
x^2/Sqrt[1 - x^2] Sqrt[1 - y^2]/
Sqrt[(y - x)^2 + i^-2], x, -1 + 1/i, 1 - 1/i, y, -1 + 1/i,
1 - 1/i, Method -> "AdaptiveMonteCarlo"], i, 1000, 100000,
1000] // N;

ListLogPlot[lst /. x_, y_ -> 1/x, y, Frame -> True,
FrameLabel -> Style["Number i", 16], Style["Integral", 16]]


yielding this



enter image description here



One can further a few other methods which may eventually enable a more accurate estimate of the integral.



Have fun!







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered yesterday









Alexei BoulbitchAlexei Boulbitch

21.9k2570




21.9k2570







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I don't understand what you're plotting. The value of this integral is 0 and your result is around 12.
    $endgroup$
    – Javier Alaminos
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    You are right, it is not the same integral, since I took Sqrt[(x-y)^2+eps^2] instead of x-y.
    $endgroup$
    – Alexei Boulbitch
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    So, to solve the original integral what do I have to do?
    $endgroup$
    – Javier Alaminos
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Note that $sqrt(y-x)^2 + epsilon^2$ approaches $|y - x|$ as $epsilon to 0$, not the $y - x$ that's in the original integrand.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Seifert
    yesterday













  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I don't understand what you're plotting. The value of this integral is 0 and your result is around 12.
    $endgroup$
    – Javier Alaminos
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    You are right, it is not the same integral, since I took Sqrt[(x-y)^2+eps^2] instead of x-y.
    $endgroup$
    – Alexei Boulbitch
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    So, to solve the original integral what do I have to do?
    $endgroup$
    – Javier Alaminos
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Note that $sqrt(y-x)^2 + epsilon^2$ approaches $|y - x|$ as $epsilon to 0$, not the $y - x$ that's in the original integrand.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Seifert
    yesterday








3




3




$begingroup$
I don't understand what you're plotting. The value of this integral is 0 and your result is around 12.
$endgroup$
– Javier Alaminos
yesterday




$begingroup$
I don't understand what you're plotting. The value of this integral is 0 and your result is around 12.
$endgroup$
– Javier Alaminos
yesterday












$begingroup$
You are right, it is not the same integral, since I took Sqrt[(x-y)^2+eps^2] instead of x-y.
$endgroup$
– Alexei Boulbitch
yesterday




$begingroup$
You are right, it is not the same integral, since I took Sqrt[(x-y)^2+eps^2] instead of x-y.
$endgroup$
– Alexei Boulbitch
yesterday












$begingroup$
So, to solve the original integral what do I have to do?
$endgroup$
– Javier Alaminos
yesterday




$begingroup$
So, to solve the original integral what do I have to do?
$endgroup$
– Javier Alaminos
yesterday












$begingroup$
Note that $sqrt(y-x)^2 + epsilon^2$ approaches $|y - x|$ as $epsilon to 0$, not the $y - x$ that's in the original integrand.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
yesterday





$begingroup$
Note that $sqrt(y-x)^2 + epsilon^2$ approaches $|y - x|$ as $epsilon to 0$, not the $y - x$ that's in the original integrand.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
yesterday












2












$begingroup$

As the others say,simply integrate by avoiding singular points?



Fixed.



Try other integral.




target = Compile[x, _Real, y, _Real, 
x/[Sqrt](1 - x) [Sqrt](1 - y^2)/(y - x)];
integrand[x_, y_] := If[Or[(1 - x) == 0, y == x], 0, target[x, y]];
Quiet@NIntegrate[integrand[x, y], x, -1., 1., y, -1., 1.]


=>



-4.06259



Integration by manual




.



Plus @@ Flatten@
Table[integrand[x, y]*0.001*0.001, x, -1., 1., 0.001, y, -1., 1.,
0.001]


=>



-3.99866



Integration by NIntegrate




N@Integrate[
x/Sqrt[1 - x] Sqrt[1 - y^2]/(y - x), x, -1, 1, y, -1, 1,
PrincipalValue -> True]


=>



-4.14669



the question's integral.



target = Compile[x, _Real, y, _Real, 
x^2/[Sqrt](1 - x^2) [Sqrt](1 - y^2)/(y - x)];
integrand[x_, y_] := If[Or[(1 - x^2) == 0, y == x], 0, target[x, y]];
Quiet@NIntegrate[integrand[x, y], x, -1., 1., y, -1., 1.]


=>



-0.4542



By manual.




Plus @@ Flatten@
Table[integrand[x, y]*0.1*0.1, x, -1., 1., 0.1, y, -1., 1., 0.1]


=>



-8.88178*10^-16



By other method.




Quiet@NIntegrate[integrand[x, y], x, -1., 1., y, -1., 1., 
Method -> "LocalAdaptive"]


=>



7.73766*10^-17


For now, we can see that the integral value is close to zero.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    But I can't avoid the singularity $x==y$, because for example if I have $x$ instead of $x^2$ the result of integral is $-pi^2/2$, and with your code the result is always 0.
    $endgroup$
    – Javier Alaminos
    yesterday











  • $begingroup$
    @JavierAlaminos as your point,my code was always 0. it's mainly because my code returns Nothing when the condition met,I think. so just modified.
    $endgroup$
    – Xminer
    yesterday















2












$begingroup$

As the others say,simply integrate by avoiding singular points?



Fixed.



Try other integral.




target = Compile[x, _Real, y, _Real, 
x/[Sqrt](1 - x) [Sqrt](1 - y^2)/(y - x)];
integrand[x_, y_] := If[Or[(1 - x) == 0, y == x], 0, target[x, y]];
Quiet@NIntegrate[integrand[x, y], x, -1., 1., y, -1., 1.]


=>



-4.06259



Integration by manual




.



Plus @@ Flatten@
Table[integrand[x, y]*0.001*0.001, x, -1., 1., 0.001, y, -1., 1.,
0.001]


=>



-3.99866



Integration by NIntegrate




N@Integrate[
x/Sqrt[1 - x] Sqrt[1 - y^2]/(y - x), x, -1, 1, y, -1, 1,
PrincipalValue -> True]


=>



-4.14669



the question's integral.



target = Compile[x, _Real, y, _Real, 
x^2/[Sqrt](1 - x^2) [Sqrt](1 - y^2)/(y - x)];
integrand[x_, y_] := If[Or[(1 - x^2) == 0, y == x], 0, target[x, y]];
Quiet@NIntegrate[integrand[x, y], x, -1., 1., y, -1., 1.]


=>



-0.4542



By manual.




Plus @@ Flatten@
Table[integrand[x, y]*0.1*0.1, x, -1., 1., 0.1, y, -1., 1., 0.1]


=>



-8.88178*10^-16



By other method.




Quiet@NIntegrate[integrand[x, y], x, -1., 1., y, -1., 1., 
Method -> "LocalAdaptive"]


=>



7.73766*10^-17


For now, we can see that the integral value is close to zero.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    But I can't avoid the singularity $x==y$, because for example if I have $x$ instead of $x^2$ the result of integral is $-pi^2/2$, and with your code the result is always 0.
    $endgroup$
    – Javier Alaminos
    yesterday











  • $begingroup$
    @JavierAlaminos as your point,my code was always 0. it's mainly because my code returns Nothing when the condition met,I think. so just modified.
    $endgroup$
    – Xminer
    yesterday













2












2








2





$begingroup$

As the others say,simply integrate by avoiding singular points?



Fixed.



Try other integral.




target = Compile[x, _Real, y, _Real, 
x/[Sqrt](1 - x) [Sqrt](1 - y^2)/(y - x)];
integrand[x_, y_] := If[Or[(1 - x) == 0, y == x], 0, target[x, y]];
Quiet@NIntegrate[integrand[x, y], x, -1., 1., y, -1., 1.]


=>



-4.06259



Integration by manual




.



Plus @@ Flatten@
Table[integrand[x, y]*0.001*0.001, x, -1., 1., 0.001, y, -1., 1.,
0.001]


=>



-3.99866



Integration by NIntegrate




N@Integrate[
x/Sqrt[1 - x] Sqrt[1 - y^2]/(y - x), x, -1, 1, y, -1, 1,
PrincipalValue -> True]


=>



-4.14669



the question's integral.



target = Compile[x, _Real, y, _Real, 
x^2/[Sqrt](1 - x^2) [Sqrt](1 - y^2)/(y - x)];
integrand[x_, y_] := If[Or[(1 - x^2) == 0, y == x], 0, target[x, y]];
Quiet@NIntegrate[integrand[x, y], x, -1., 1., y, -1., 1.]


=>



-0.4542



By manual.




Plus @@ Flatten@
Table[integrand[x, y]*0.1*0.1, x, -1., 1., 0.1, y, -1., 1., 0.1]


=>



-8.88178*10^-16



By other method.




Quiet@NIntegrate[integrand[x, y], x, -1., 1., y, -1., 1., 
Method -> "LocalAdaptive"]


=>



7.73766*10^-17


For now, we can see that the integral value is close to zero.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



As the others say,simply integrate by avoiding singular points?



Fixed.



Try other integral.




target = Compile[x, _Real, y, _Real, 
x/[Sqrt](1 - x) [Sqrt](1 - y^2)/(y - x)];
integrand[x_, y_] := If[Or[(1 - x) == 0, y == x], 0, target[x, y]];
Quiet@NIntegrate[integrand[x, y], x, -1., 1., y, -1., 1.]


=>



-4.06259



Integration by manual




.



Plus @@ Flatten@
Table[integrand[x, y]*0.001*0.001, x, -1., 1., 0.001, y, -1., 1.,
0.001]


=>



-3.99866



Integration by NIntegrate




N@Integrate[
x/Sqrt[1 - x] Sqrt[1 - y^2]/(y - x), x, -1, 1, y, -1, 1,
PrincipalValue -> True]


=>



-4.14669



the question's integral.



target = Compile[x, _Real, y, _Real, 
x^2/[Sqrt](1 - x^2) [Sqrt](1 - y^2)/(y - x)];
integrand[x_, y_] := If[Or[(1 - x^2) == 0, y == x], 0, target[x, y]];
Quiet@NIntegrate[integrand[x, y], x, -1., 1., y, -1., 1.]


=>



-0.4542



By manual.




Plus @@ Flatten@
Table[integrand[x, y]*0.1*0.1, x, -1., 1., 0.1, y, -1., 1., 0.1]


=>



-8.88178*10^-16



By other method.




Quiet@NIntegrate[integrand[x, y], x, -1., 1., y, -1., 1., 
Method -> "LocalAdaptive"]


=>



7.73766*10^-17


For now, we can see that the integral value is close to zero.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited yesterday

























answered yesterday









XminerXminer

33818




33818











  • $begingroup$
    But I can't avoid the singularity $x==y$, because for example if I have $x$ instead of $x^2$ the result of integral is $-pi^2/2$, and with your code the result is always 0.
    $endgroup$
    – Javier Alaminos
    yesterday











  • $begingroup$
    @JavierAlaminos as your point,my code was always 0. it's mainly because my code returns Nothing when the condition met,I think. so just modified.
    $endgroup$
    – Xminer
    yesterday
















  • $begingroup$
    But I can't avoid the singularity $x==y$, because for example if I have $x$ instead of $x^2$ the result of integral is $-pi^2/2$, and with your code the result is always 0.
    $endgroup$
    – Javier Alaminos
    yesterday











  • $begingroup$
    @JavierAlaminos as your point,my code was always 0. it's mainly because my code returns Nothing when the condition met,I think. so just modified.
    $endgroup$
    – Xminer
    yesterday















$begingroup$
But I can't avoid the singularity $x==y$, because for example if I have $x$ instead of $x^2$ the result of integral is $-pi^2/2$, and with your code the result is always 0.
$endgroup$
– Javier Alaminos
yesterday





$begingroup$
But I can't avoid the singularity $x==y$, because for example if I have $x$ instead of $x^2$ the result of integral is $-pi^2/2$, and with your code the result is always 0.
$endgroup$
– Javier Alaminos
yesterday













$begingroup$
@JavierAlaminos as your point,my code was always 0. it's mainly because my code returns Nothing when the condition met,I think. so just modified.
$endgroup$
– Xminer
yesterday




$begingroup$
@JavierAlaminos as your point,my code was always 0. it's mainly because my code returns Nothing when the condition met,I think. so just modified.
$endgroup$
– Xminer
yesterday










Javier Alaminos is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















Javier Alaminos is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Javier Alaminos is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Javier Alaminos is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193926%2fnintegrate-how-can-i-solve-this-integral-numerically-nintegrate-fails-while-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-numerical-integration

Popular posts from this blog

Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god existsWord for having a definite opinion while simultaneously withholding judgment?What's the opposite of “newcomer? Is ”veteran" OK?What do you call an “atheist” who might believe in an afterlife?What's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Word for someone who dismisses contrary opinions as irrational?Somone who thinks they are overly special/out of the ordinaryIs there a word, phrase or idiom for “a person who is incapable of thinking about the future”?The belief that a god is human-likeA word for a non-famous person/thing you have heard a lot aboutAdjective for a person who enjoys taking care of their appearance

What was this official D&D 3.5e Lovecraft-flavored rulebook?What was this set of RPG tools called?As a first-time DM should I let my players play complex character classes and roles?Nymph's Kiss and the RelationshipWhat was the name of this Cleric Prestige Class that shapes metal with its bare hands?Are the 3.5e Dragonlance books third party or official works?What's up with the domain Vile Darkness?What was this 80s book about RPGs?What was the name of this Werewolf band?What book had Rituals to “upgrade” animal companions to keep them viable at higher levels?What was this RPG that had rules for player-owned businesses?

2017 IndyCar Series Contents Series news Teams and drivers Schedule Season summary Footnotes References External links Navigation menu"INDYCAR: Initial 2018 bodywork concepts unveiled"the original"IndyCar confirms switch to Performance Friction brakes in 2017""AJ Foyt Racing will switch to Chevy"the original"Carlos Munoz, Conor Daly will drive for AJ Foyt Racing""Zach Veach's Indy 500 Debut Confirmed with Foyt""No mass exodus from Honda after Ganassi switch""Ex-F1 driver Sato joins Andretti Autosport for 2017 IndyCar season""IndyCar's Ryan Hunter-Reay, sponsor DHL paired through 2020""hhgregg and Andretti Autosport announce partnership for key races in 2016""INDYCAR: Rossi re-signs with Andretti"the original"McLaren Formula 1 - Fernando Alonso to race at Indy 500 with McLaren, Honda and Andretti Autosport""Shank will finally take part in Indy 500 with Harvey, Andretti | MotorSportsTalk""Andretti adds Jack Harvey to Indy 500 field""Ganassi switches to Honda power for 2017""INDYCAR: Chilton returns to Ganassi"the original"IndyCar silly season: Who's going where in 2017?""INDYCAR: Kanaan, NTT Data return to Ganassi"the original"Kimball to remain at Ganassi for 2017""Coyne confirms Bourdais for 2017 IndyCar season""Davison to sub for Bourdais in Indy 500"the original"Gutierrez confirmed for Detroit IndyCar debut""Gutierrez returns with Coyne for rest of 2017 season""Vautier to drive for Coyne at Texas"the original"INDYCAR: Coyne confirms Jones for 2017"the original"Pippa Mann returns to Coyne for Indy 500""Karam, Dreyer & Reinbold teaming up again for Indianapolis 500""Pigot to return to Ed Carpenter Racing""Hildebrand confirmed as full-time Ed Carpenter driver""Veach to replace injured Hildebrand at Barber"the originalNew Team Harding Racing Enters Chaves for 101st Indianapolis 500"Juncos Racing Announces Entry in 101st Running of the Indianapolis 500 :: Juncos Racing""Juncos confirms Pigot for Indy 500""Saavedra confirmed in Juncos' second 500 entry"the original"Lazier confirms Indy 500 run after son's USF2000 debut"the original"Claman DeMelo to race for RLLR at Sonoma"the original"Rahal signs Servia and ace engineer for 2017""IndyCar: Aleshin returns with Schmidt"the original"Aleshin replaced by Saavedra for Toronto""Jack Harvey will pilot SPM No. 7 car at Watkins Glen, Sonoma""Jay Howard confirmed in Tony Stewart's supported SPM Indy entry""INDYCAR: Newgarden to wave the flag at Penske"the original"Pagenaud opts for No. 1 in 2017"the original"Penske confirms Newgarden for 2017""Montoya to stay with Team Penske in 2017""Target leaving IndyCar after 27 seasons with Chip Ganassi""Cavin: IndyCar could see complete driver/team shakeup in 2017""End of the road for KV Racing?""KV Racing confirms closure, equipment sold to Juncos""Juncos confirms IndyCar Series entry"the original"Juncos readies IndyCar program, aims for '17 500"the original"Harding Racing to add Texas, Pocono to schedule"the original"Sato signs with Andretti Autosport for 2017""INDYCAR: Aleshin in Doubt at SPM"the original"Long Beach notebook: JR Hildebrand breaks hand""Hildebrand cleared to return at Phoenix"the original"Bourdais to undergo surgery on multiple fractures""Aleshin loses Schmidt Peterson IndyCar ride""Saavedra in at SPM for Pocono, Gateway"the original"Bourdais to make return at Gateway"the original"The IndyCar Grand Prix no longer is sponsored by Angie's List""2017 IndyCar Series rulebook""2017 Verizon IndyCar Series Official Rulebook"Official websiteeeeee