What would you call a finite collection of unordered objects that are not necessarily distinct?Definition of correspondenceName for variations of elements from several setsComparison of two sets of 4-tuples using combinatoricsComparison of two collections of 4-tuples using combinatorics - more complicated versionPermutation of numbers from multiple sets [May contain duplicate numbers among other sets], resulting in Non-Duplicate SetPredicting the number of unique elements in the Cartesian product of a set with itselfIs there symbol to denote a combination and permutation?Name for a set in which some of the elements are also contained in other set elements?What would you call this?Is there a name for the set of “unique” combinations of the powerset of $2^n$ modulo permutation?

Tiptoe or tiphoof? Adjusting words to better fit fantasy races

The plural of 'stomach"

Should my PhD thesis be submitted under my legal name?

If you attempt to grapple an opponent that you are hidden from, do they roll at disadvantage?

Why are on-board computers allowed to change controls without notifying the pilots?

How can I use the arrow sign in my bash prompt?

Coordinate position not precise

Using parameter substitution on a Bash array

How can I replace every global instance of "x[2]" with "x_2"

Is a roofing delivery truck likely to crack my driveway slab?

How to verify if g is a generator for p?

What's the purpose of "true" in bash "if sudo true; then"

Is it okay / does it make sense for another player to join a running game of Munchkin?

How will losing mobility of one hand affect my career as a programmer?

What will be the benefits of Brexit?

Mapping a list into a phase plot

Increase performance creating Mandelbrot set in python

when is out of tune ok?

Curses work by shouting - How to avoid collateral damage?

What would be the benefits of having both a state and local currencies?

Why "be dealt cards" rather than "be dealing cards"?

Is there any reason not to eat food that's been dropped on the surface of the moon?

Your magic is very sketchy

Generic lambda vs generic function give different behaviour



What would you call a finite collection of unordered objects that are not necessarily distinct?


Definition of correspondenceName for variations of elements from several setsComparison of two sets of 4-tuples using combinatoricsComparison of two collections of 4-tuples using combinatorics - more complicated versionPermutation of numbers from multiple sets [May contain duplicate numbers among other sets], resulting in Non-Duplicate SetPredicting the number of unique elements in the Cartesian product of a set with itselfIs there symbol to denote a combination and permutation?Name for a set in which some of the elements are also contained in other set elements?What would you call this?Is there a name for the set of “unique” combinations of the powerset of $2^n$ modulo permutation?













9












$begingroup$


I Just want to know the name for this if there is one because I don't think it satisifies any of the formal definitions for sets, n-tuples, sequences, combinations, permutations, or any other enumerated objects I can think of.



For convenience, I will henceforth use the term $mathbf set^*$ with an asterisk to refer to what I described in the title.



As a quick example, let $mathbfA$ and $mathbfB $ be $mathbf set^*$'s where $$mathbfA = 3,3,4,11,4,8$$
$$mathbfB = 4,3,4,8,11,3$$



Then $mathbfA $ and $mathbf B $ are equal.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    9












    $begingroup$


    I Just want to know the name for this if there is one because I don't think it satisifies any of the formal definitions for sets, n-tuples, sequences, combinations, permutations, or any other enumerated objects I can think of.



    For convenience, I will henceforth use the term $mathbf set^*$ with an asterisk to refer to what I described in the title.



    As a quick example, let $mathbfA$ and $mathbfB $ be $mathbf set^*$'s where $$mathbfA = 3,3,4,11,4,8$$
    $$mathbfB = 4,3,4,8,11,3$$



    Then $mathbfA $ and $mathbf B $ are equal.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      9












      9








      9


      2



      $begingroup$


      I Just want to know the name for this if there is one because I don't think it satisifies any of the formal definitions for sets, n-tuples, sequences, combinations, permutations, or any other enumerated objects I can think of.



      For convenience, I will henceforth use the term $mathbf set^*$ with an asterisk to refer to what I described in the title.



      As a quick example, let $mathbfA$ and $mathbfB $ be $mathbf set^*$'s where $$mathbfA = 3,3,4,11,4,8$$
      $$mathbfB = 4,3,4,8,11,3$$



      Then $mathbfA $ and $mathbf B $ are equal.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I Just want to know the name for this if there is one because I don't think it satisifies any of the formal definitions for sets, n-tuples, sequences, combinations, permutations, or any other enumerated objects I can think of.



      For convenience, I will henceforth use the term $mathbf set^*$ with an asterisk to refer to what I described in the title.



      As a quick example, let $mathbfA$ and $mathbfB $ be $mathbf set^*$'s where $$mathbfA = 3,3,4,11,4,8$$
      $$mathbfB = 4,3,4,8,11,3$$



      Then $mathbfA $ and $mathbf B $ are equal.







      combinatorics elementary-set-theory notation permutations definition






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked yesterday









      Nicholas CousarNicholas Cousar

      374212




      374212




















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          35












          $begingroup$

          If you're looking for something like a set which may have repeated elements, standard terms are multiset or bag. See multiset on wikipedia.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            7












            $begingroup$

            The common term is multiset. For a formal definition, you can for instance define the set of multisets of size $n$ of a given set $A$ as $A^n/mathfrakS_n$ where $mathfrakS_n$ acts by permutation of the factors; or if you don't want to be bothered by size you can define it as a map $f: Ato mathbbN$ where $f(a)$ is supposed to represent the number of times $a$ appears in the multiset.



            These are two interesting models for different situations, and there are probably more.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$




















              4












              $begingroup$

              In this context you can identify what you call a $mathbf set^*$ with a function that has a finite domain and has $mathbb N=1,2,3cdots$ as codomain.



              $A$ and $B$ in your question can both be identified with function: $$langle3,2rangle,langle4,2rangle,langle8,1rangle,langle11,1rangle$$Domain of the function in this case is the set $3,4,8,11$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$




















                1












                $begingroup$

                If two objects can be distinguished by the number of times an element appears in them, that is called "multiplicity". So the more mathy version of "finite collection of unordered objects that are not necessarily distinct" would be "unordered finite collection with multiplicity" or "finite collection with multiplicity but not order".



                The single-word term for unordered collections with multiplicity is "multi-set", but I don't think there's any single-word term for finite multi-sets. Googling "math collection multiplicity no order" returns http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Set.html and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiplicity_(mathematics) , both of which mention multisets.



                Another term that is used in the context of eigenvalues is "spectrum": the multiplicity of the eigenvalues is important, but there is no canonical order (other than the normal order of the real numbers, but that doesn't apply if they are complex). When you diagonalize or take the Jordan canonical form of a matrix, it matters how many times each eigenvalue appears, but putting the eigenvalues in a different order results in the same matrix, up to similarity.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$












                  Your Answer





                  StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
                  return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
                  StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
                  StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                  );
                  );
                  , "mathjax-editing");

                  StackExchange.ready(function()
                  var channelOptions =
                  tags: "".split(" "),
                  id: "69"
                  ;
                  initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                  StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                  // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                  if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                  StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                  createEditor();
                  );

                  else
                  createEditor();

                  );

                  function createEditor()
                  StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                  heartbeatType: 'answer',
                  autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                  convertImagesToLinks: true,
                  noModals: true,
                  showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                  reputationToPostImages: 10,
                  bindNavPrevention: true,
                  postfix: "",
                  imageUploader:
                  brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                  contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                  allowUrls: true
                  ,
                  noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                  discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                  ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                  );



                  );













                  draft saved

                  draft discarded


















                  StackExchange.ready(
                  function ()
                  StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3161647%2fwhat-would-you-call-a-finite-collection-of-unordered-objects-that-are-not-necess%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                  );

                  Post as a guest















                  Required, but never shown

























                  4 Answers
                  4






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes








                  4 Answers
                  4






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  active

                  oldest

                  votes






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  35












                  $begingroup$

                  If you're looking for something like a set which may have repeated elements, standard terms are multiset or bag. See multiset on wikipedia.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$

















                    35












                    $begingroup$

                    If you're looking for something like a set which may have repeated elements, standard terms are multiset or bag. See multiset on wikipedia.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$















                      35












                      35








                      35





                      $begingroup$

                      If you're looking for something like a set which may have repeated elements, standard terms are multiset or bag. See multiset on wikipedia.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      If you're looking for something like a set which may have repeated elements, standard terms are multiset or bag. See multiset on wikipedia.







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered yesterday









                      Especially LimeEspecially Lime

                      22.6k23059




                      22.6k23059





















                          7












                          $begingroup$

                          The common term is multiset. For a formal definition, you can for instance define the set of multisets of size $n$ of a given set $A$ as $A^n/mathfrakS_n$ where $mathfrakS_n$ acts by permutation of the factors; or if you don't want to be bothered by size you can define it as a map $f: Ato mathbbN$ where $f(a)$ is supposed to represent the number of times $a$ appears in the multiset.



                          These are two interesting models for different situations, and there are probably more.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$

















                            7












                            $begingroup$

                            The common term is multiset. For a formal definition, you can for instance define the set of multisets of size $n$ of a given set $A$ as $A^n/mathfrakS_n$ where $mathfrakS_n$ acts by permutation of the factors; or if you don't want to be bothered by size you can define it as a map $f: Ato mathbbN$ where $f(a)$ is supposed to represent the number of times $a$ appears in the multiset.



                            These are two interesting models for different situations, and there are probably more.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$















                              7












                              7








                              7





                              $begingroup$

                              The common term is multiset. For a formal definition, you can for instance define the set of multisets of size $n$ of a given set $A$ as $A^n/mathfrakS_n$ where $mathfrakS_n$ acts by permutation of the factors; or if you don't want to be bothered by size you can define it as a map $f: Ato mathbbN$ where $f(a)$ is supposed to represent the number of times $a$ appears in the multiset.



                              These are two interesting models for different situations, and there are probably more.






                              share|cite|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$



                              The common term is multiset. For a formal definition, you can for instance define the set of multisets of size $n$ of a given set $A$ as $A^n/mathfrakS_n$ where $mathfrakS_n$ acts by permutation of the factors; or if you don't want to be bothered by size you can define it as a map $f: Ato mathbbN$ where $f(a)$ is supposed to represent the number of times $a$ appears in the multiset.



                              These are two interesting models for different situations, and there are probably more.







                              share|cite|improve this answer












                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer










                              answered yesterday









                              MaxMax

                              15.6k11143




                              15.6k11143





















                                  4












                                  $begingroup$

                                  In this context you can identify what you call a $mathbf set^*$ with a function that has a finite domain and has $mathbb N=1,2,3cdots$ as codomain.



                                  $A$ and $B$ in your question can both be identified with function: $$langle3,2rangle,langle4,2rangle,langle8,1rangle,langle11,1rangle$$Domain of the function in this case is the set $3,4,8,11$.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$

















                                    4












                                    $begingroup$

                                    In this context you can identify what you call a $mathbf set^*$ with a function that has a finite domain and has $mathbb N=1,2,3cdots$ as codomain.



                                    $A$ and $B$ in your question can both be identified with function: $$langle3,2rangle,langle4,2rangle,langle8,1rangle,langle11,1rangle$$Domain of the function in this case is the set $3,4,8,11$.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$















                                      4












                                      4








                                      4





                                      $begingroup$

                                      In this context you can identify what you call a $mathbf set^*$ with a function that has a finite domain and has $mathbb N=1,2,3cdots$ as codomain.



                                      $A$ and $B$ in your question can both be identified with function: $$langle3,2rangle,langle4,2rangle,langle8,1rangle,langle11,1rangle$$Domain of the function in this case is the set $3,4,8,11$.






                                      share|cite|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$



                                      In this context you can identify what you call a $mathbf set^*$ with a function that has a finite domain and has $mathbb N=1,2,3cdots$ as codomain.



                                      $A$ and $B$ in your question can both be identified with function: $$langle3,2rangle,langle4,2rangle,langle8,1rangle,langle11,1rangle$$Domain of the function in this case is the set $3,4,8,11$.







                                      share|cite|improve this answer












                                      share|cite|improve this answer



                                      share|cite|improve this answer










                                      answered yesterday









                                      drhabdrhab

                                      103k545136




                                      103k545136





















                                          1












                                          $begingroup$

                                          If two objects can be distinguished by the number of times an element appears in them, that is called "multiplicity". So the more mathy version of "finite collection of unordered objects that are not necessarily distinct" would be "unordered finite collection with multiplicity" or "finite collection with multiplicity but not order".



                                          The single-word term for unordered collections with multiplicity is "multi-set", but I don't think there's any single-word term for finite multi-sets. Googling "math collection multiplicity no order" returns http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Set.html and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiplicity_(mathematics) , both of which mention multisets.



                                          Another term that is used in the context of eigenvalues is "spectrum": the multiplicity of the eigenvalues is important, but there is no canonical order (other than the normal order of the real numbers, but that doesn't apply if they are complex). When you diagonalize or take the Jordan canonical form of a matrix, it matters how many times each eigenvalue appears, but putting the eigenvalues in a different order results in the same matrix, up to similarity.






                                          share|cite|improve this answer









                                          $endgroup$

















                                            1












                                            $begingroup$

                                            If two objects can be distinguished by the number of times an element appears in them, that is called "multiplicity". So the more mathy version of "finite collection of unordered objects that are not necessarily distinct" would be "unordered finite collection with multiplicity" or "finite collection with multiplicity but not order".



                                            The single-word term for unordered collections with multiplicity is "multi-set", but I don't think there's any single-word term for finite multi-sets. Googling "math collection multiplicity no order" returns http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Set.html and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiplicity_(mathematics) , both of which mention multisets.



                                            Another term that is used in the context of eigenvalues is "spectrum": the multiplicity of the eigenvalues is important, but there is no canonical order (other than the normal order of the real numbers, but that doesn't apply if they are complex). When you diagonalize or take the Jordan canonical form of a matrix, it matters how many times each eigenvalue appears, but putting the eigenvalues in a different order results in the same matrix, up to similarity.






                                            share|cite|improve this answer









                                            $endgroup$















                                              1












                                              1








                                              1





                                              $begingroup$

                                              If two objects can be distinguished by the number of times an element appears in them, that is called "multiplicity". So the more mathy version of "finite collection of unordered objects that are not necessarily distinct" would be "unordered finite collection with multiplicity" or "finite collection with multiplicity but not order".



                                              The single-word term for unordered collections with multiplicity is "multi-set", but I don't think there's any single-word term for finite multi-sets. Googling "math collection multiplicity no order" returns http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Set.html and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiplicity_(mathematics) , both of which mention multisets.



                                              Another term that is used in the context of eigenvalues is "spectrum": the multiplicity of the eigenvalues is important, but there is no canonical order (other than the normal order of the real numbers, but that doesn't apply if they are complex). When you diagonalize or take the Jordan canonical form of a matrix, it matters how many times each eigenvalue appears, but putting the eigenvalues in a different order results in the same matrix, up to similarity.






                                              share|cite|improve this answer









                                              $endgroup$



                                              If two objects can be distinguished by the number of times an element appears in them, that is called "multiplicity". So the more mathy version of "finite collection of unordered objects that are not necessarily distinct" would be "unordered finite collection with multiplicity" or "finite collection with multiplicity but not order".



                                              The single-word term for unordered collections with multiplicity is "multi-set", but I don't think there's any single-word term for finite multi-sets. Googling "math collection multiplicity no order" returns http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Set.html and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiplicity_(mathematics) , both of which mention multisets.



                                              Another term that is used in the context of eigenvalues is "spectrum": the multiplicity of the eigenvalues is important, but there is no canonical order (other than the normal order of the real numbers, but that doesn't apply if they are complex). When you diagonalize or take the Jordan canonical form of a matrix, it matters how many times each eigenvalue appears, but putting the eigenvalues in a different order results in the same matrix, up to similarity.







                                              share|cite|improve this answer












                                              share|cite|improve this answer



                                              share|cite|improve this answer










                                              answered yesterday









                                              AcccumulationAcccumulation

                                              7,1752619




                                              7,1752619



























                                                  draft saved

                                                  draft discarded
















































                                                  Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                                  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                  But avoid


                                                  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                                  Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                                  To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                  draft saved


                                                  draft discarded














                                                  StackExchange.ready(
                                                  function ()
                                                  StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3161647%2fwhat-would-you-call-a-finite-collection-of-unordered-objects-that-are-not-necess%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                                  );

                                                  Post as a guest















                                                  Required, but never shown





















































                                                  Required, but never shown














                                                  Required, but never shown












                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Required, but never shown

































                                                  Required, but never shown














                                                  Required, but never shown












                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  -combinatorics, definition, elementary-set-theory, notation, permutations

                                                  Popular posts from this blog

                                                  Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god existsWord for having a definite opinion while simultaneously withholding judgment?What's the opposite of “newcomer? Is ”veteran" OK?What do you call an “atheist” who might believe in an afterlife?What's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Word for someone who dismisses contrary opinions as irrational?Somone who thinks they are overly special/out of the ordinaryIs there a word, phrase or idiom for “a person who is incapable of thinking about the future”?The belief that a god is human-likeA word for a non-famous person/thing you have heard a lot aboutAdjective for a person who enjoys taking care of their appearance

                                                  What was this official D&D 3.5e Lovecraft-flavored rulebook?What was this set of RPG tools called?As a first-time DM should I let my players play complex character classes and roles?Nymph's Kiss and the RelationshipWhat was the name of this Cleric Prestige Class that shapes metal with its bare hands?Are the 3.5e Dragonlance books third party or official works?What's up with the domain Vile Darkness?What was this 80s book about RPGs?What was the name of this Werewolf band?What book had Rituals to “upgrade” animal companions to keep them viable at higher levels?What was this RPG that had rules for player-owned businesses?

                                                  2017 IndyCar Series Contents Series news Teams and drivers Schedule Season summary Footnotes References External links Navigation menu"INDYCAR: Initial 2018 bodywork concepts unveiled"the original"IndyCar confirms switch to Performance Friction brakes in 2017""AJ Foyt Racing will switch to Chevy"the original"Carlos Munoz, Conor Daly will drive for AJ Foyt Racing""Zach Veach's Indy 500 Debut Confirmed with Foyt""No mass exodus from Honda after Ganassi switch""Ex-F1 driver Sato joins Andretti Autosport for 2017 IndyCar season""IndyCar's Ryan Hunter-Reay, sponsor DHL paired through 2020""hhgregg and Andretti Autosport announce partnership for key races in 2016""INDYCAR: Rossi re-signs with Andretti"the original"McLaren Formula 1 - Fernando Alonso to race at Indy 500 with McLaren, Honda and Andretti Autosport""Shank will finally take part in Indy 500 with Harvey, Andretti | MotorSportsTalk""Andretti adds Jack Harvey to Indy 500 field""Ganassi switches to Honda power for 2017""INDYCAR: Chilton returns to Ganassi"the original"IndyCar silly season: Who's going where in 2017?""INDYCAR: Kanaan, NTT Data return to Ganassi"the original"Kimball to remain at Ganassi for 2017""Coyne confirms Bourdais for 2017 IndyCar season""Davison to sub for Bourdais in Indy 500"the original"Gutierrez confirmed for Detroit IndyCar debut""Gutierrez returns with Coyne for rest of 2017 season""Vautier to drive for Coyne at Texas"the original"INDYCAR: Coyne confirms Jones for 2017"the original"Pippa Mann returns to Coyne for Indy 500""Karam, Dreyer & Reinbold teaming up again for Indianapolis 500""Pigot to return to Ed Carpenter Racing""Hildebrand confirmed as full-time Ed Carpenter driver""Veach to replace injured Hildebrand at Barber"the originalNew Team Harding Racing Enters Chaves for 101st Indianapolis 500"Juncos Racing Announces Entry in 101st Running of the Indianapolis 500 :: Juncos Racing""Juncos confirms Pigot for Indy 500""Saavedra confirmed in Juncos' second 500 entry"the original"Lazier confirms Indy 500 run after son's USF2000 debut"the original"Claman DeMelo to race for RLLR at Sonoma"the original"Rahal signs Servia and ace engineer for 2017""IndyCar: Aleshin returns with Schmidt"the original"Aleshin replaced by Saavedra for Toronto""Jack Harvey will pilot SPM No. 7 car at Watkins Glen, Sonoma""Jay Howard confirmed in Tony Stewart's supported SPM Indy entry""INDYCAR: Newgarden to wave the flag at Penske"the original"Pagenaud opts for No. 1 in 2017"the original"Penske confirms Newgarden for 2017""Montoya to stay with Team Penske in 2017""Target leaving IndyCar after 27 seasons with Chip Ganassi""Cavin: IndyCar could see complete driver/team shakeup in 2017""End of the road for KV Racing?""KV Racing confirms closure, equipment sold to Juncos""Juncos confirms IndyCar Series entry"the original"Juncos readies IndyCar program, aims for '17 500"the original"Harding Racing to add Texas, Pocono to schedule"the original"Sato signs with Andretti Autosport for 2017""INDYCAR: Aleshin in Doubt at SPM"the original"Long Beach notebook: JR Hildebrand breaks hand""Hildebrand cleared to return at Phoenix"the original"Bourdais to undergo surgery on multiple fractures""Aleshin loses Schmidt Peterson IndyCar ride""Saavedra in at SPM for Pocono, Gateway"the original"Bourdais to make return at Gateway"the original"The IndyCar Grand Prix no longer is sponsored by Angie's List""2017 IndyCar Series rulebook""2017 Verizon IndyCar Series Official Rulebook"Official websiteeeeee