Does an adjective change meaning in “in length”?“Desolated”; past tense of an adjective?How can 'important', an adjective, modify an entire clause? Why not an adverb?It is + adjective + wh clauseMeaning of AdjectiveDoes the verb “reduce” have an adjective form meaning “can be reduced”?“Quite” before an adjectiveUsage of ''as'' before adjectiveUsage of “worth” as both adjective and noun in question sentencemake a question sentence with adjective '' long ''Use of rotating in two different form

Mapping a list into a phase plot

Can somebody explain Brexit in a few child-proof sentences?

How does residential electricity work?

Why "be dealt cards" rather than "be dealing cards"?

Why is delta-v is the most useful quantity for planning space travel?

Teaching indefinite integrals that require special-casing

How to prove that the query oracle is unitary?

Personal Teleportation as a Weapon

There is only s̶i̶x̶t̶y one place he can be

Implement the Thanos sorting algorithm

What are the ramifications of creating a homebrew world without an Astral Plane?

How will losing mobility of one hand affect my career as a programmer?

Best way to store options for panels

Is there a measurement for the vocal speed of a song?

Do I need a multiple entry visa for a trip UK -> Sweden -> UK?

Can I Retrieve Email Addresses from BCC?

How does a character multiclassing into warlock get a focus?

Print name if parameter passed to function

Star/Wye electrical connection math symbol

Why does John Bercow say “unlock” after reading out the results of a vote?

At which point does a character regain all their Hit Dice?

What is the oldest known work of fiction?

Is exact Kanji stroke length important?

MaTeX, font size, and PlotLegends



Does an adjective change meaning in “in length”?


“Desolated”; past tense of an adjective?How can 'important', an adjective, modify an entire clause? Why not an adverb?It is + adjective + wh clauseMeaning of AdjectiveDoes the verb “reduce” have an adjective form meaning “can be reduced”?“Quite” before an adjectiveUsage of ''as'' before adjectiveUsage of “worth” as both adjective and noun in question sentencemake a question sentence with adjective '' long ''Use of rotating in two different form













2















When an adjective is used in structure “ in length “ as is the case with sentence below, does it change it's meaning ?




We can cut lumbers into 5 meters in longest length .




If this sentence are wrong ,please correct me .










share|improve this question
























  • "lumbers" with an "s" is simply totally wrong. You cut planks to length. The word "lumbers" does not exist (except in very unusual situations).

    – Fattie
    yesterday











  • Note that timber (softwood anyway) tends to come in a variety of standard sizes from 1.8m to 6.3m. It would be quite limiting to be unable to provide timber in a length of less than 5m.

    – Strawberry
    yesterday











  • What are you asking? In the first sentence, you say that 5 meters is the longest length, but in your second sentence you say it's the minimum length. The words longest and minimum have essentially opposite meanings.

    – Jason Bassford
    yesterday











  • I deleted second one . I realized later . My fault. I asked if the use of in longest length correct or not.

    – language learner
    yesterday
















2















When an adjective is used in structure “ in length “ as is the case with sentence below, does it change it's meaning ?




We can cut lumbers into 5 meters in longest length .




If this sentence are wrong ,please correct me .










share|improve this question
























  • "lumbers" with an "s" is simply totally wrong. You cut planks to length. The word "lumbers" does not exist (except in very unusual situations).

    – Fattie
    yesterday











  • Note that timber (softwood anyway) tends to come in a variety of standard sizes from 1.8m to 6.3m. It would be quite limiting to be unable to provide timber in a length of less than 5m.

    – Strawberry
    yesterday











  • What are you asking? In the first sentence, you say that 5 meters is the longest length, but in your second sentence you say it's the minimum length. The words longest and minimum have essentially opposite meanings.

    – Jason Bassford
    yesterday











  • I deleted second one . I realized later . My fault. I asked if the use of in longest length correct or not.

    – language learner
    yesterday














2












2








2


1






When an adjective is used in structure “ in length “ as is the case with sentence below, does it change it's meaning ?




We can cut lumbers into 5 meters in longest length .




If this sentence are wrong ,please correct me .










share|improve this question
















When an adjective is used in structure “ in length “ as is the case with sentence below, does it change it's meaning ?




We can cut lumbers into 5 meters in longest length .




If this sentence are wrong ,please correct me .







adjectives






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday







language learner

















asked yesterday









language learnerlanguage learner

1165




1165












  • "lumbers" with an "s" is simply totally wrong. You cut planks to length. The word "lumbers" does not exist (except in very unusual situations).

    – Fattie
    yesterday











  • Note that timber (softwood anyway) tends to come in a variety of standard sizes from 1.8m to 6.3m. It would be quite limiting to be unable to provide timber in a length of less than 5m.

    – Strawberry
    yesterday











  • What are you asking? In the first sentence, you say that 5 meters is the longest length, but in your second sentence you say it's the minimum length. The words longest and minimum have essentially opposite meanings.

    – Jason Bassford
    yesterday











  • I deleted second one . I realized later . My fault. I asked if the use of in longest length correct or not.

    – language learner
    yesterday


















  • "lumbers" with an "s" is simply totally wrong. You cut planks to length. The word "lumbers" does not exist (except in very unusual situations).

    – Fattie
    yesterday











  • Note that timber (softwood anyway) tends to come in a variety of standard sizes from 1.8m to 6.3m. It would be quite limiting to be unable to provide timber in a length of less than 5m.

    – Strawberry
    yesterday











  • What are you asking? In the first sentence, you say that 5 meters is the longest length, but in your second sentence you say it's the minimum length. The words longest and minimum have essentially opposite meanings.

    – Jason Bassford
    yesterday











  • I deleted second one . I realized later . My fault. I asked if the use of in longest length correct or not.

    – language learner
    yesterday

















"lumbers" with an "s" is simply totally wrong. You cut planks to length. The word "lumbers" does not exist (except in very unusual situations).

– Fattie
yesterday





"lumbers" with an "s" is simply totally wrong. You cut planks to length. The word "lumbers" does not exist (except in very unusual situations).

– Fattie
yesterday













Note that timber (softwood anyway) tends to come in a variety of standard sizes from 1.8m to 6.3m. It would be quite limiting to be unable to provide timber in a length of less than 5m.

– Strawberry
yesterday





Note that timber (softwood anyway) tends to come in a variety of standard sizes from 1.8m to 6.3m. It would be quite limiting to be unable to provide timber in a length of less than 5m.

– Strawberry
yesterday













What are you asking? In the first sentence, you say that 5 meters is the longest length, but in your second sentence you say it's the minimum length. The words longest and minimum have essentially opposite meanings.

– Jason Bassford
yesterday





What are you asking? In the first sentence, you say that 5 meters is the longest length, but in your second sentence you say it's the minimum length. The words longest and minimum have essentially opposite meanings.

– Jason Bassford
yesterday













I deleted second one . I realized later . My fault. I asked if the use of in longest length correct or not.

– language learner
yesterday






I deleted second one . I realized later . My fault. I asked if the use of in longest length correct or not.

– language learner
yesterday











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4














The reason we say, for example, "5 metres in length" is to show that the measurement of 5 metres is the length and not any other dimension such as width. We don't always prefix "length" with "in".



You are right in saying that "lumber" and "timber" are non-countable nouns, but "a length" can be used as a noun for a specific cut of timber, the plural of which is "lengths".



So you could say:




We can cut timber into 5-metre minimum lengths.*




*you have to be careful this does not sound like you mean 5 lengths of one metre each, because a 1-metre length can be called "a metre length".



or




We can cut timber into lengths no shorter than 5 metres.




(these are using "length" as a noun for the piece of cut timber)



or




The minimum length we can cut timber into is 5 metres.




(this is using "length" as a noun for the measurement)






share|improve this answer

























  • @Justin Quite right, corrected.

    – Astralbee
    yesterday


















3














I think "lumber" is a non-countable noun, and "timber" is both countable and non-countable, but that may be an American English difference if that's what you're learning.



"We can cut lumber to 5 metres longest length" means (a) they can cut to less than 5 metres, and (b) some pieces will be shorter than 5 metres.



"We can cut timber into minimum of 5 metres" means they can't cut timber shorter than 5 metres -- the opposite to above.






share|improve this answer






















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "481"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f202239%2fdoes-an-adjective-change-meaning-in-in-length%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    The reason we say, for example, "5 metres in length" is to show that the measurement of 5 metres is the length and not any other dimension such as width. We don't always prefix "length" with "in".



    You are right in saying that "lumber" and "timber" are non-countable nouns, but "a length" can be used as a noun for a specific cut of timber, the plural of which is "lengths".



    So you could say:




    We can cut timber into 5-metre minimum lengths.*




    *you have to be careful this does not sound like you mean 5 lengths of one metre each, because a 1-metre length can be called "a metre length".



    or




    We can cut timber into lengths no shorter than 5 metres.




    (these are using "length" as a noun for the piece of cut timber)



    or




    The minimum length we can cut timber into is 5 metres.




    (this is using "length" as a noun for the measurement)






    share|improve this answer

























    • @Justin Quite right, corrected.

      – Astralbee
      yesterday















    4














    The reason we say, for example, "5 metres in length" is to show that the measurement of 5 metres is the length and not any other dimension such as width. We don't always prefix "length" with "in".



    You are right in saying that "lumber" and "timber" are non-countable nouns, but "a length" can be used as a noun for a specific cut of timber, the plural of which is "lengths".



    So you could say:




    We can cut timber into 5-metre minimum lengths.*




    *you have to be careful this does not sound like you mean 5 lengths of one metre each, because a 1-metre length can be called "a metre length".



    or




    We can cut timber into lengths no shorter than 5 metres.




    (these are using "length" as a noun for the piece of cut timber)



    or




    The minimum length we can cut timber into is 5 metres.




    (this is using "length" as a noun for the measurement)






    share|improve this answer

























    • @Justin Quite right, corrected.

      – Astralbee
      yesterday













    4












    4








    4







    The reason we say, for example, "5 metres in length" is to show that the measurement of 5 metres is the length and not any other dimension such as width. We don't always prefix "length" with "in".



    You are right in saying that "lumber" and "timber" are non-countable nouns, but "a length" can be used as a noun for a specific cut of timber, the plural of which is "lengths".



    So you could say:




    We can cut timber into 5-metre minimum lengths.*




    *you have to be careful this does not sound like you mean 5 lengths of one metre each, because a 1-metre length can be called "a metre length".



    or




    We can cut timber into lengths no shorter than 5 metres.




    (these are using "length" as a noun for the piece of cut timber)



    or




    The minimum length we can cut timber into is 5 metres.




    (this is using "length" as a noun for the measurement)






    share|improve this answer















    The reason we say, for example, "5 metres in length" is to show that the measurement of 5 metres is the length and not any other dimension such as width. We don't always prefix "length" with "in".



    You are right in saying that "lumber" and "timber" are non-countable nouns, but "a length" can be used as a noun for a specific cut of timber, the plural of which is "lengths".



    So you could say:




    We can cut timber into 5-metre minimum lengths.*




    *you have to be careful this does not sound like you mean 5 lengths of one metre each, because a 1-metre length can be called "a metre length".



    or




    We can cut timber into lengths no shorter than 5 metres.




    (these are using "length" as a noun for the piece of cut timber)



    or




    The minimum length we can cut timber into is 5 metres.




    (this is using "length" as a noun for the measurement)







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited yesterday

























    answered yesterday









    AstralbeeAstralbee

    12.9k1146




    12.9k1146












    • @Justin Quite right, corrected.

      – Astralbee
      yesterday

















    • @Justin Quite right, corrected.

      – Astralbee
      yesterday
















    @Justin Quite right, corrected.

    – Astralbee
    yesterday





    @Justin Quite right, corrected.

    – Astralbee
    yesterday













    3














    I think "lumber" is a non-countable noun, and "timber" is both countable and non-countable, but that may be an American English difference if that's what you're learning.



    "We can cut lumber to 5 metres longest length" means (a) they can cut to less than 5 metres, and (b) some pieces will be shorter than 5 metres.



    "We can cut timber into minimum of 5 metres" means they can't cut timber shorter than 5 metres -- the opposite to above.






    share|improve this answer



























      3














      I think "lumber" is a non-countable noun, and "timber" is both countable and non-countable, but that may be an American English difference if that's what you're learning.



      "We can cut lumber to 5 metres longest length" means (a) they can cut to less than 5 metres, and (b) some pieces will be shorter than 5 metres.



      "We can cut timber into minimum of 5 metres" means they can't cut timber shorter than 5 metres -- the opposite to above.






      share|improve this answer

























        3












        3








        3







        I think "lumber" is a non-countable noun, and "timber" is both countable and non-countable, but that may be an American English difference if that's what you're learning.



        "We can cut lumber to 5 metres longest length" means (a) they can cut to less than 5 metres, and (b) some pieces will be shorter than 5 metres.



        "We can cut timber into minimum of 5 metres" means they can't cut timber shorter than 5 metres -- the opposite to above.






        share|improve this answer













        I think "lumber" is a non-countable noun, and "timber" is both countable and non-countable, but that may be an American English difference if that's what you're learning.



        "We can cut lumber to 5 metres longest length" means (a) they can cut to less than 5 metres, and (b) some pieces will be shorter than 5 metres.



        "We can cut timber into minimum of 5 metres" means they can't cut timber shorter than 5 metres -- the opposite to above.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        OwainOwain

        46115




        46115



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f202239%2fdoes-an-adjective-change-meaning-in-in-length%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -adjectives

            Popular posts from this blog

            Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god existsWord for having a definite opinion while simultaneously withholding judgment?What's the opposite of “newcomer? Is ”veteran" OK?What do you call an “atheist” who might believe in an afterlife?What's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Word for someone who dismisses contrary opinions as irrational?Somone who thinks they are overly special/out of the ordinaryIs there a word, phrase or idiom for “a person who is incapable of thinking about the future”?The belief that a god is human-likeA word for a non-famous person/thing you have heard a lot aboutAdjective for a person who enjoys taking care of their appearance

            What was this official D&D 3.5e Lovecraft-flavored rulebook?What was this set of RPG tools called?As a first-time DM should I let my players play complex character classes and roles?Nymph's Kiss and the RelationshipWhat was the name of this Cleric Prestige Class that shapes metal with its bare hands?Are the 3.5e Dragonlance books third party or official works?What's up with the domain Vile Darkness?What was this 80s book about RPGs?What was the name of this Werewolf band?What book had Rituals to “upgrade” animal companions to keep them viable at higher levels?What was this RPG that had rules for player-owned businesses?

            2017 IndyCar Series Contents Series news Teams and drivers Schedule Season summary Footnotes References External links Navigation menu"INDYCAR: Initial 2018 bodywork concepts unveiled"the original"IndyCar confirms switch to Performance Friction brakes in 2017""AJ Foyt Racing will switch to Chevy"the original"Carlos Munoz, Conor Daly will drive for AJ Foyt Racing""Zach Veach's Indy 500 Debut Confirmed with Foyt""No mass exodus from Honda after Ganassi switch""Ex-F1 driver Sato joins Andretti Autosport for 2017 IndyCar season""IndyCar's Ryan Hunter-Reay, sponsor DHL paired through 2020""hhgregg and Andretti Autosport announce partnership for key races in 2016""INDYCAR: Rossi re-signs with Andretti"the original"McLaren Formula 1 - Fernando Alonso to race at Indy 500 with McLaren, Honda and Andretti Autosport""Shank will finally take part in Indy 500 with Harvey, Andretti | MotorSportsTalk""Andretti adds Jack Harvey to Indy 500 field""Ganassi switches to Honda power for 2017""INDYCAR: Chilton returns to Ganassi"the original"IndyCar silly season: Who's going where in 2017?""INDYCAR: Kanaan, NTT Data return to Ganassi"the original"Kimball to remain at Ganassi for 2017""Coyne confirms Bourdais for 2017 IndyCar season""Davison to sub for Bourdais in Indy 500"the original"Gutierrez confirmed for Detroit IndyCar debut""Gutierrez returns with Coyne for rest of 2017 season""Vautier to drive for Coyne at Texas"the original"INDYCAR: Coyne confirms Jones for 2017"the original"Pippa Mann returns to Coyne for Indy 500""Karam, Dreyer & Reinbold teaming up again for Indianapolis 500""Pigot to return to Ed Carpenter Racing""Hildebrand confirmed as full-time Ed Carpenter driver""Veach to replace injured Hildebrand at Barber"the originalNew Team Harding Racing Enters Chaves for 101st Indianapolis 500"Juncos Racing Announces Entry in 101st Running of the Indianapolis 500 :: Juncos Racing""Juncos confirms Pigot for Indy 500""Saavedra confirmed in Juncos' second 500 entry"the original"Lazier confirms Indy 500 run after son's USF2000 debut"the original"Claman DeMelo to race for RLLR at Sonoma"the original"Rahal signs Servia and ace engineer for 2017""IndyCar: Aleshin returns with Schmidt"the original"Aleshin replaced by Saavedra for Toronto""Jack Harvey will pilot SPM No. 7 car at Watkins Glen, Sonoma""Jay Howard confirmed in Tony Stewart's supported SPM Indy entry""INDYCAR: Newgarden to wave the flag at Penske"the original"Pagenaud opts for No. 1 in 2017"the original"Penske confirms Newgarden for 2017""Montoya to stay with Team Penske in 2017""Target leaving IndyCar after 27 seasons with Chip Ganassi""Cavin: IndyCar could see complete driver/team shakeup in 2017""End of the road for KV Racing?""KV Racing confirms closure, equipment sold to Juncos""Juncos confirms IndyCar Series entry"the original"Juncos readies IndyCar program, aims for '17 500"the original"Harding Racing to add Texas, Pocono to schedule"the original"Sato signs with Andretti Autosport for 2017""INDYCAR: Aleshin in Doubt at SPM"the original"Long Beach notebook: JR Hildebrand breaks hand""Hildebrand cleared to return at Phoenix"the original"Bourdais to undergo surgery on multiple fractures""Aleshin loses Schmidt Peterson IndyCar ride""Saavedra in at SPM for Pocono, Gateway"the original"Bourdais to make return at Gateway"the original"The IndyCar Grand Prix no longer is sponsored by Angie's List""2017 IndyCar Series rulebook""2017 Verizon IndyCar Series Official Rulebook"Official websiteeeeee