When the Haste spell ends on a creature, do attackers have advantage against that creature? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)On the turn after Haste ends, can you use a reaction?On the turn after Haste ends, can you use a reaction?Does Fey Ancestry grant advantage on the save against Otto's Irresistible Dance?What happens with lethargy when Haste is cast again on a creature before first cast runs out?Can I use haste on an enemy to make them waste two turns?Will an Antimagic Field on a target of a “Haste” spell trigger the wave of lethargy?Can you magically fly while Paralyzed?Does paralysis prevent actions that don’t require movement?Is a slowed creature denied the action to break free from Hold Person spell?Can you use a readied action after Haste?Can Bigby's Hand attempt Strength and Dexterity saving throws?

When the Haste spell ends on a creature, do attackers have advantage against that creature?

When a candle burns, why does the top of wick glow if bottom of flame is hottest?

Did MS DOS itself ever use blinking text?

How does the math work when buying airline miles?

Amount of permutations on an NxNxN Rubik's Cube

How would a mousetrap for use in space work?

Maximum summed powersets with non-adjacent items

What does the "x" in "x86" represent?

How do I find out the mythology and history of my Fortress?

Does classifying an integer as a discrete log require it be part of a multiplicative group?

Using audio cues to encourage good posture

Generate an RGB colour grid

Do wooden building fires get hotter than 600°C?

How do I make this wiring inside cabinet safer? (Pic)

Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?

Denied boarding although I have proper visa and documentation. To whom should I make a complaint?

Is CEO the profession with the most psychopaths?

Is it fair for a professor to grade us on the possession of past papers?

Circuit to "zoom in" on mV fluctuations of a DC signal?

Why are both D and D# fitting into my E minor key?

What do you call the main part of a joke?

Is there such thing as an Availability Group failover trigger?

For a new assistant professor in CS, how to build/manage a publication pipeline

How can I use the Python library networkx from Mathematica?



When the Haste spell ends on a creature, do attackers have advantage against that creature?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)On the turn after Haste ends, can you use a reaction?On the turn after Haste ends, can you use a reaction?Does Fey Ancestry grant advantage on the save against Otto's Irresistible Dance?What happens with lethargy when Haste is cast again on a creature before first cast runs out?Can I use haste on an enemy to make them waste two turns?Will an Antimagic Field on a target of a “Haste” spell trigger the wave of lethargy?Can you magically fly while Paralyzed?Does paralysis prevent actions that don’t require movement?Is a slowed creature denied the action to break free from Hold Person spell?Can you use a readied action after Haste?Can Bigby's Hand attempt Strength and Dexterity saving throws?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








11












$begingroup$


The rules for the haste spell state the following:




When the spell ends, the target can’t move or take actions until after its next turn, as a wave of lethargy sweeps over it.



--- Player's Handbook p. 250




Does this give attackers an advantage against you as you cannot move? What about making Strength/Dexterity saves during this period? I find it unclear as to what it means by 'can’t move or take actions'?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If it meant the "Stunned" condition, it would say so. The only ambiguity in my eyes is whether "actions" includes Bonus Actions. I think so.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Cordes
    10 hours ago

















11












$begingroup$


The rules for the haste spell state the following:




When the spell ends, the target can’t move or take actions until after its next turn, as a wave of lethargy sweeps over it.



--- Player's Handbook p. 250




Does this give attackers an advantage against you as you cannot move? What about making Strength/Dexterity saves during this period? I find it unclear as to what it means by 'can’t move or take actions'?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If it meant the "Stunned" condition, it would say so. The only ambiguity in my eyes is whether "actions" includes Bonus Actions. I think so.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Cordes
    10 hours ago













11












11








11





$begingroup$


The rules for the haste spell state the following:




When the spell ends, the target can’t move or take actions until after its next turn, as a wave of lethargy sweeps over it.



--- Player's Handbook p. 250




Does this give attackers an advantage against you as you cannot move? What about making Strength/Dexterity saves during this period? I find it unclear as to what it means by 'can’t move or take actions'?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




The rules for the haste spell state the following:




When the spell ends, the target can’t move or take actions until after its next turn, as a wave of lethargy sweeps over it.



--- Player's Handbook p. 250




Does this give attackers an advantage against you as you cannot move? What about making Strength/Dexterity saves during this period? I find it unclear as to what it means by 'can’t move or take actions'?







dnd-5e spells advantage-and-disadvantage






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago









V2Blast

27.5k597167




27.5k597167










asked 12 hours ago









GeorgeGeorge

1117




1117







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If it meant the "Stunned" condition, it would say so. The only ambiguity in my eyes is whether "actions" includes Bonus Actions. I think so.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Cordes
    10 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If it meant the "Stunned" condition, it would say so. The only ambiguity in my eyes is whether "actions" includes Bonus Actions. I think so.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Cordes
    10 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
If it meant the "Stunned" condition, it would say so. The only ambiguity in my eyes is whether "actions" includes Bonus Actions. I think so.
$endgroup$
– Peter Cordes
10 hours ago




$begingroup$
If it meant the "Stunned" condition, it would say so. The only ambiguity in my eyes is whether "actions" includes Bonus Actions. I think so.
$endgroup$
– Peter Cordes
10 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















20












$begingroup$

It means exactly what it says: No movement (speed becomes 0), and no actions (action, bonus action or reaction).



The rest of the mechanics apply normally: no disadvantage, saves as needed. It doesn't say that any specific condition applies, so nothing else matters...






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    According to rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/59079/… you can still use reactions.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob Watts
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @RobWatts According to that link it seems that reactions are "a special kind of action".
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    9 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Vadruk: That is according to the answer with fewer upvotes. While reactions may be a "special kind of action", there's no rule that says things that prevent actions also prevent reactions (and, in fact, everything that prevents reactions specifically says so, separately from actions). They are "special", after all.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @V2Blast After reading both answers a couple more time, I have to agree with you.
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I feel that Crawford's tweet is (intentionally?) vague, probably stating his preference for ruling over the Haste spell, but it was two years ago and it hasn't made it into the Sage Advice (updated 2019), so his ruling may not be what the developers intended - as stated in PHB (special kind of action).
    $endgroup$
    – adonies
    1 hour ago












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145379%2fwhen-the-haste-spell-ends-on-a-creature-do-attackers-have-advantage-against-tha%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









20












$begingroup$

It means exactly what it says: No movement (speed becomes 0), and no actions (action, bonus action or reaction).



The rest of the mechanics apply normally: no disadvantage, saves as needed. It doesn't say that any specific condition applies, so nothing else matters...






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    According to rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/59079/… you can still use reactions.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob Watts
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @RobWatts According to that link it seems that reactions are "a special kind of action".
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    9 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Vadruk: That is according to the answer with fewer upvotes. While reactions may be a "special kind of action", there's no rule that says things that prevent actions also prevent reactions (and, in fact, everything that prevents reactions specifically says so, separately from actions). They are "special", after all.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @V2Blast After reading both answers a couple more time, I have to agree with you.
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I feel that Crawford's tweet is (intentionally?) vague, probably stating his preference for ruling over the Haste spell, but it was two years ago and it hasn't made it into the Sage Advice (updated 2019), so his ruling may not be what the developers intended - as stated in PHB (special kind of action).
    $endgroup$
    – adonies
    1 hour ago
















20












$begingroup$

It means exactly what it says: No movement (speed becomes 0), and no actions (action, bonus action or reaction).



The rest of the mechanics apply normally: no disadvantage, saves as needed. It doesn't say that any specific condition applies, so nothing else matters...






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    According to rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/59079/… you can still use reactions.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob Watts
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @RobWatts According to that link it seems that reactions are "a special kind of action".
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    9 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Vadruk: That is according to the answer with fewer upvotes. While reactions may be a "special kind of action", there's no rule that says things that prevent actions also prevent reactions (and, in fact, everything that prevents reactions specifically says so, separately from actions). They are "special", after all.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @V2Blast After reading both answers a couple more time, I have to agree with you.
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I feel that Crawford's tweet is (intentionally?) vague, probably stating his preference for ruling over the Haste spell, but it was two years ago and it hasn't made it into the Sage Advice (updated 2019), so his ruling may not be what the developers intended - as stated in PHB (special kind of action).
    $endgroup$
    – adonies
    1 hour ago














20












20








20





$begingroup$

It means exactly what it says: No movement (speed becomes 0), and no actions (action, bonus action or reaction).



The rest of the mechanics apply normally: no disadvantage, saves as needed. It doesn't say that any specific condition applies, so nothing else matters...






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



It means exactly what it says: No movement (speed becomes 0), and no actions (action, bonus action or reaction).



The rest of the mechanics apply normally: no disadvantage, saves as needed. It doesn't say that any specific condition applies, so nothing else matters...







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 8 mins ago









V2Blast

27.5k597167




27.5k597167










answered 12 hours ago









adoniesadonies

7772615




7772615







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    According to rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/59079/… you can still use reactions.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob Watts
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @RobWatts According to that link it seems that reactions are "a special kind of action".
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    9 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Vadruk: That is according to the answer with fewer upvotes. While reactions may be a "special kind of action", there's no rule that says things that prevent actions also prevent reactions (and, in fact, everything that prevents reactions specifically says so, separately from actions). They are "special", after all.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @V2Blast After reading both answers a couple more time, I have to agree with you.
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I feel that Crawford's tweet is (intentionally?) vague, probably stating his preference for ruling over the Haste spell, but it was two years ago and it hasn't made it into the Sage Advice (updated 2019), so his ruling may not be what the developers intended - as stated in PHB (special kind of action).
    $endgroup$
    – adonies
    1 hour ago













  • 3




    $begingroup$
    According to rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/59079/… you can still use reactions.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob Watts
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @RobWatts According to that link it seems that reactions are "a special kind of action".
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    9 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Vadruk: That is according to the answer with fewer upvotes. While reactions may be a "special kind of action", there's no rule that says things that prevent actions also prevent reactions (and, in fact, everything that prevents reactions specifically says so, separately from actions). They are "special", after all.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @V2Blast After reading both answers a couple more time, I have to agree with you.
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I feel that Crawford's tweet is (intentionally?) vague, probably stating his preference for ruling over the Haste spell, but it was two years ago and it hasn't made it into the Sage Advice (updated 2019), so his ruling may not be what the developers intended - as stated in PHB (special kind of action).
    $endgroup$
    – adonies
    1 hour ago








3




3




$begingroup$
According to rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/59079/… you can still use reactions.
$endgroup$
– Rob Watts
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
According to rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/59079/… you can still use reactions.
$endgroup$
– Rob Watts
11 hours ago












$begingroup$
@RobWatts According to that link it seems that reactions are "a special kind of action".
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
9 hours ago





$begingroup$
@RobWatts According to that link it seems that reactions are "a special kind of action".
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
9 hours ago





2




2




$begingroup$
@Vadruk: That is according to the answer with fewer upvotes. While reactions may be a "special kind of action", there's no rule that says things that prevent actions also prevent reactions (and, in fact, everything that prevents reactions specifically says so, separately from actions). They are "special", after all.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Vadruk: That is according to the answer with fewer upvotes. While reactions may be a "special kind of action", there's no rule that says things that prevent actions also prevent reactions (and, in fact, everything that prevents reactions specifically says so, separately from actions). They are "special", after all.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
@V2Blast After reading both answers a couple more time, I have to agree with you.
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@V2Blast After reading both answers a couple more time, I have to agree with you.
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
I feel that Crawford's tweet is (intentionally?) vague, probably stating his preference for ruling over the Haste spell, but it was two years ago and it hasn't made it into the Sage Advice (updated 2019), so his ruling may not be what the developers intended - as stated in PHB (special kind of action).
$endgroup$
– adonies
1 hour ago





$begingroup$
I feel that Crawford's tweet is (intentionally?) vague, probably stating his preference for ruling over the Haste spell, but it was two years ago and it hasn't made it into the Sage Advice (updated 2019), so his ruling may not be what the developers intended - as stated in PHB (special kind of action).
$endgroup$
– adonies
1 hour ago


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145379%2fwhen-the-haste-spell-ends-on-a-creature-do-attackers-have-advantage-against-tha%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-advantage-and-disadvantage, dnd-5e, spells

Popular posts from this blog

Frič See also Navigation menuinternal link

Identify plant with long narrow paired leaves and reddish stems Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?What is this plant with long sharp leaves? Is it a weed?What is this 3ft high, stalky plant, with mid sized narrow leaves?What is this young shrub with opposite ovate, crenate leaves and reddish stems?What is this plant with large broad serrated leaves?Identify this upright branching weed with long leaves and reddish stemsPlease help me identify this bulbous plant with long, broad leaves and white flowersWhat is this small annual with narrow gray/green leaves and rust colored daisy-type flowers?What is this chilli plant?Does anyone know what type of chilli plant this is?Help identify this plant

fontconfig warning: “/etc/fonts/fonts.conf”, line 100: unknown “element blank” The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In“tar: unrecognized option --warning” during 'apt-get install'How to fix Fontconfig errorHow do I figure out which font file is chosen for a system generic font alias?Why are some apt-get-installed fonts being ignored by fc-list, xfontsel, etc?Reload settings in /etc/fonts/conf.dTaking 30 seconds longer to boot after upgrade from jessie to stretchHow to match multiple font names with a single <match> element?Adding a custom font to fontconfigRemoving fonts from fontconfig <match> resultsBroken fonts after upgrading Firefox ESR to latest Firefox