Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Favourite questions and answers from the 1st quarter of 2019How could Jon Snow do what he did in “Oathbreaker”?Was this Cersei's plan?What was the significance of Varys' appearance in Dorne?What was Lenny's obsession with Airplane models?Frank Underwood's Obsession with PowerIs this montage in Game of Thrones (S07E03) imaginary?Do the Faceless Men take more than just a face?What are Cersei's intentions throughout this interaction?Why does Ramsay Snow engineer a sham escape?Did Daenerys know how to hatch the dragon eggs?

また usage in a dictionary

Using et al. for a last / senior author rather than for a first author

Declining "dulcis" in context

Do wooden building fires get hotter than 600°C?

How to show element name in portuguese using elements package?

Is "Reachable Object" really an NP-complete problem?

Delete nth line from bottom

Can you use the Shield Master feat to shove someone before you make an attack by using a Readied action?

Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?

Why are both D and D# fitting into my E minor key?

Would "destroying" Wurmcoil Engine prevent its tokens from being created?

Quick way to create a symlink?

What is this building called? (It was built in 2002)

How to react to hostile behavior from a senior developer?

How can I use the Python library networkx from Mathematica?

What does the "x" in "x86" represent?

8 Prisoners wearing hats

What are the out-of-universe reasons for the references to Toby Maguire-era Spider-Man in ITSV

Can a new player join a group only when a new campaign starts?

Did MS DOS itself ever use blinking text?

How would a mousetrap for use in space work?

Is there any way for the UK Prime Minister to make a motion directly dependent on Government confidence?

How come Sam didn't become Lord of Horn Hill?

How do I find out the mythology and history of my Fortress?



Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Favourite questions and answers from the 1st quarter of 2019How could Jon Snow do what he did in “Oathbreaker”?Was this Cersei's plan?What was the significance of Varys' appearance in Dorne?What was Lenny's obsession with Airplane models?Frank Underwood's Obsession with PowerIs this montage in Game of Thrones (S07E03) imaginary?Do the Faceless Men take more than just a face?What are Cersei's intentions throughout this interaction?Why does Ramsay Snow engineer a sham escape?Did Daenerys know how to hatch the dragon eggs?










19















In Game of Thrones S08E01, Cersei was so disappointed for not getting elephants and it's being part of so many memes and joke now.



But why does elephant matter? Her competition/rivalry is with Daenerys/Starks etc. And they have dragons. So what purpose elephants can fulfill? What is the significance of this obsession?










share|improve this question



















  • 6





    Elephants can prove to be a valuable deterrent against charge of the Dothraki cavalry, provided Dragons do not interfere or are lured to deal with some other threat while Golden company with their elephants deals with the Dothraki. Horsemen and their horses can be terrified when they face elephants for first time. IRL Historically however, it doesn't work all that well. A determined mounted force can repel Elephants. See Alexander against Indian Elephants or Saad bin Abi Waqas against Persian Elephants.

    – Aegon
    11 hours ago






  • 3





    I took it as a joke and meant to highlight how out of touch Cersei is with the reality of the situation. The army of the dead marches on Westeros and she is concerned with the prestige of having elephants in her army. I laughed when she said "I really wanted those elephants..."

    – DKu
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    I wonder if the GoT budget this season wasn't big enough to include CGI and/or real elephants?

    – RobertF
    9 hours ago






  • 2





    @RobertF "What do dragons eat anyways?" ...... "CGI budget"....*Ghost whimpers sadly in the background*

    – Aegon
    9 hours ago











  • comment because unsubstantiated personal hypothesis: Cersei is jealous of Dany's dragons. She wanted the elephants so she could trot them out and say "look I can have intimidating war beasts too :P" as much to herself as to Dany.

    – Jared K
    6 hours ago















19















In Game of Thrones S08E01, Cersei was so disappointed for not getting elephants and it's being part of so many memes and joke now.



But why does elephant matter? Her competition/rivalry is with Daenerys/Starks etc. And they have dragons. So what purpose elephants can fulfill? What is the significance of this obsession?










share|improve this question



















  • 6





    Elephants can prove to be a valuable deterrent against charge of the Dothraki cavalry, provided Dragons do not interfere or are lured to deal with some other threat while Golden company with their elephants deals with the Dothraki. Horsemen and their horses can be terrified when they face elephants for first time. IRL Historically however, it doesn't work all that well. A determined mounted force can repel Elephants. See Alexander against Indian Elephants or Saad bin Abi Waqas against Persian Elephants.

    – Aegon
    11 hours ago






  • 3





    I took it as a joke and meant to highlight how out of touch Cersei is with the reality of the situation. The army of the dead marches on Westeros and she is concerned with the prestige of having elephants in her army. I laughed when she said "I really wanted those elephants..."

    – DKu
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    I wonder if the GoT budget this season wasn't big enough to include CGI and/or real elephants?

    – RobertF
    9 hours ago






  • 2





    @RobertF "What do dragons eat anyways?" ...... "CGI budget"....*Ghost whimpers sadly in the background*

    – Aegon
    9 hours ago











  • comment because unsubstantiated personal hypothesis: Cersei is jealous of Dany's dragons. She wanted the elephants so she could trot them out and say "look I can have intimidating war beasts too :P" as much to herself as to Dany.

    – Jared K
    6 hours ago













19












19








19








In Game of Thrones S08E01, Cersei was so disappointed for not getting elephants and it's being part of so many memes and joke now.



But why does elephant matter? Her competition/rivalry is with Daenerys/Starks etc. And they have dragons. So what purpose elephants can fulfill? What is the significance of this obsession?










share|improve this question
















In Game of Thrones S08E01, Cersei was so disappointed for not getting elephants and it's being part of so many memes and joke now.



But why does elephant matter? Her competition/rivalry is with Daenerys/Starks etc. And they have dragons. So what purpose elephants can fulfill? What is the significance of this obsession?







character game-of-thrones






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 10 hours ago









Paulie_D

89.5k18318294




89.5k18318294










asked 11 hours ago









Ankit SharmaAnkit Sharma

77.2k63413628




77.2k63413628







  • 6





    Elephants can prove to be a valuable deterrent against charge of the Dothraki cavalry, provided Dragons do not interfere or are lured to deal with some other threat while Golden company with their elephants deals with the Dothraki. Horsemen and their horses can be terrified when they face elephants for first time. IRL Historically however, it doesn't work all that well. A determined mounted force can repel Elephants. See Alexander against Indian Elephants or Saad bin Abi Waqas against Persian Elephants.

    – Aegon
    11 hours ago






  • 3





    I took it as a joke and meant to highlight how out of touch Cersei is with the reality of the situation. The army of the dead marches on Westeros and she is concerned with the prestige of having elephants in her army. I laughed when she said "I really wanted those elephants..."

    – DKu
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    I wonder if the GoT budget this season wasn't big enough to include CGI and/or real elephants?

    – RobertF
    9 hours ago






  • 2





    @RobertF "What do dragons eat anyways?" ...... "CGI budget"....*Ghost whimpers sadly in the background*

    – Aegon
    9 hours ago











  • comment because unsubstantiated personal hypothesis: Cersei is jealous of Dany's dragons. She wanted the elephants so she could trot them out and say "look I can have intimidating war beasts too :P" as much to herself as to Dany.

    – Jared K
    6 hours ago












  • 6





    Elephants can prove to be a valuable deterrent against charge of the Dothraki cavalry, provided Dragons do not interfere or are lured to deal with some other threat while Golden company with their elephants deals with the Dothraki. Horsemen and their horses can be terrified when they face elephants for first time. IRL Historically however, it doesn't work all that well. A determined mounted force can repel Elephants. See Alexander against Indian Elephants or Saad bin Abi Waqas against Persian Elephants.

    – Aegon
    11 hours ago






  • 3





    I took it as a joke and meant to highlight how out of touch Cersei is with the reality of the situation. The army of the dead marches on Westeros and she is concerned with the prestige of having elephants in her army. I laughed when she said "I really wanted those elephants..."

    – DKu
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    I wonder if the GoT budget this season wasn't big enough to include CGI and/or real elephants?

    – RobertF
    9 hours ago






  • 2





    @RobertF "What do dragons eat anyways?" ...... "CGI budget"....*Ghost whimpers sadly in the background*

    – Aegon
    9 hours ago











  • comment because unsubstantiated personal hypothesis: Cersei is jealous of Dany's dragons. She wanted the elephants so she could trot them out and say "look I can have intimidating war beasts too :P" as much to herself as to Dany.

    – Jared K
    6 hours ago







6




6





Elephants can prove to be a valuable deterrent against charge of the Dothraki cavalry, provided Dragons do not interfere or are lured to deal with some other threat while Golden company with their elephants deals with the Dothraki. Horsemen and their horses can be terrified when they face elephants for first time. IRL Historically however, it doesn't work all that well. A determined mounted force can repel Elephants. See Alexander against Indian Elephants or Saad bin Abi Waqas against Persian Elephants.

– Aegon
11 hours ago





Elephants can prove to be a valuable deterrent against charge of the Dothraki cavalry, provided Dragons do not interfere or are lured to deal with some other threat while Golden company with their elephants deals with the Dothraki. Horsemen and their horses can be terrified when they face elephants for first time. IRL Historically however, it doesn't work all that well. A determined mounted force can repel Elephants. See Alexander against Indian Elephants or Saad bin Abi Waqas against Persian Elephants.

– Aegon
11 hours ago




3




3





I took it as a joke and meant to highlight how out of touch Cersei is with the reality of the situation. The army of the dead marches on Westeros and she is concerned with the prestige of having elephants in her army. I laughed when she said "I really wanted those elephants..."

– DKu
11 hours ago





I took it as a joke and meant to highlight how out of touch Cersei is with the reality of the situation. The army of the dead marches on Westeros and she is concerned with the prestige of having elephants in her army. I laughed when she said "I really wanted those elephants..."

– DKu
11 hours ago




1




1





I wonder if the GoT budget this season wasn't big enough to include CGI and/or real elephants?

– RobertF
9 hours ago





I wonder if the GoT budget this season wasn't big enough to include CGI and/or real elephants?

– RobertF
9 hours ago




2




2





@RobertF "What do dragons eat anyways?" ...... "CGI budget"....*Ghost whimpers sadly in the background*

– Aegon
9 hours ago





@RobertF "What do dragons eat anyways?" ...... "CGI budget"....*Ghost whimpers sadly in the background*

– Aegon
9 hours ago













comment because unsubstantiated personal hypothesis: Cersei is jealous of Dany's dragons. She wanted the elephants so she could trot them out and say "look I can have intimidating war beasts too :P" as much to herself as to Dany.

– Jared K
6 hours ago





comment because unsubstantiated personal hypothesis: Cersei is jealous of Dany's dragons. She wanted the elephants so she could trot them out and say "look I can have intimidating war beasts too :P" as much to herself as to Dany.

– Jared K
6 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















21














It seems they were a kind of Easter-Egg.



In the novels, we received a long narrative about the elephants of The Golden Company, which was left out of the show.




In George R. R. Martin’s fifth GOT novel, A Dance With Dragons, we learn of The Golden Company through a rather long-winded side story that has thankfully been cut from the HBO show lest it get even more complicated. Someone in the writer’s room clearly wasn’t happy with this decision, and so decided to throw in an elephant-sized easter egg for viewers who have also read the series so far.




Cersei’s need for elephants in the Game Of Thrones premiere comes directly from the books - Metro UK




So, it seems like this is a special Easter-Egg for those who have read the series.






share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    I sooo wanted Aegon VI to come charging out on an Elephant. Surprise fellow-Valyrians!

    – Aegon
    10 hours ago






  • 1





    I'd assumed that they mentioned elephants at the end of Season 7 because the producers wanted to pressure HBO into providing enough budget for real elephants. "We need elephants, the fans expect it!". Cersei is expressing their disappointment.

    – user568458
    2 hours ago



















9














Elephants are always a funny kind of weapon



Having a big weapon on your side is a terrible advantage. Elephant is a good historical example: while they don't deal a lot of damage per se, they are terrible for enemy morale. You can only have a few, and each of them won't deal a lot of damage. But if you are on the other side, that's another topic.



Gosh, an elephant charging me! Ok, so if we all keep the formation, the elephant will crush on our spear formation. Sure, there will be casualties, but we will win. The only thing we had to do is keep our formation. Hey, what is Joe doing? he can't escape the battle, can he? Whatever, he was a coward. We can keep formation without him. But, wait, Jack is also fleeing! He was the best of us. If even he thinks we are lost... But we need to keep the formation! Oh, no, some others are also running. The formation just broke up, the odds are very bad for me. Yep, better run for my life.



Even if the elephant wouldn't do that much damage, it crushes the enemy formation, and you can now deal much more damage.



Why on earth wouldn(t you want such a weapon?



sure, the enemy also have a huge weapon. but that won't ensure you that the foot soldiers will keep the formation.



And it's because she doesn't have dragons that she wants a similar, smaller armed animal that can afraid the enemy.



So that we don't expect elephants



Golden company is well-known for their elephants. Harry Strickland is proud of them, and as it's the final season, we expect massive battles. This scene is also a way for showrunners to tell the spectators to don't expect any elephant. Sorry, all CGI budget was burned on dragons.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    The won't deal a lot of damage part depends on the strategy and the elephants, the Oliphaunts in Lord of the rings did a lot of damage.

    – Gustavo Gabriel
    10 hours ago







  • 6





    The oliphaunts were three times the height of elephants & carried huge "battle scythes" like living combined-harvesters, because their outsized tusks could sweep the ground.

    – Tetsujin
    9 hours ago






  • 2





    Elephants were very easy to defeat because they have a strong self-preservation instinct; give elephants a way to escape the battle (by, say, causing your formation to have large, safe gaps) and they take it. Until the Romans figured that out, though, elephants were extremely difficult to deal with.

    – Michael W.
    9 hours ago






  • 3





    @Tetsujin The LOTR Oliphaunts weren't elephants; they were Ultralisks!

    – Mason Wheeler
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    Paper beats rock, rock beats scissors, flaming pigs beat elephants.

    – Jeff Lambert
    7 hours ago


















2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









21














It seems they were a kind of Easter-Egg.



In the novels, we received a long narrative about the elephants of The Golden Company, which was left out of the show.




In George R. R. Martin’s fifth GOT novel, A Dance With Dragons, we learn of The Golden Company through a rather long-winded side story that has thankfully been cut from the HBO show lest it get even more complicated. Someone in the writer’s room clearly wasn’t happy with this decision, and so decided to throw in an elephant-sized easter egg for viewers who have also read the series so far.




Cersei’s need for elephants in the Game Of Thrones premiere comes directly from the books - Metro UK




So, it seems like this is a special Easter-Egg for those who have read the series.






share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    I sooo wanted Aegon VI to come charging out on an Elephant. Surprise fellow-Valyrians!

    – Aegon
    10 hours ago






  • 1





    I'd assumed that they mentioned elephants at the end of Season 7 because the producers wanted to pressure HBO into providing enough budget for real elephants. "We need elephants, the fans expect it!". Cersei is expressing their disappointment.

    – user568458
    2 hours ago
















21














It seems they were a kind of Easter-Egg.



In the novels, we received a long narrative about the elephants of The Golden Company, which was left out of the show.




In George R. R. Martin’s fifth GOT novel, A Dance With Dragons, we learn of The Golden Company through a rather long-winded side story that has thankfully been cut from the HBO show lest it get even more complicated. Someone in the writer’s room clearly wasn’t happy with this decision, and so decided to throw in an elephant-sized easter egg for viewers who have also read the series so far.




Cersei’s need for elephants in the Game Of Thrones premiere comes directly from the books - Metro UK




So, it seems like this is a special Easter-Egg for those who have read the series.






share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    I sooo wanted Aegon VI to come charging out on an Elephant. Surprise fellow-Valyrians!

    – Aegon
    10 hours ago






  • 1





    I'd assumed that they mentioned elephants at the end of Season 7 because the producers wanted to pressure HBO into providing enough budget for real elephants. "We need elephants, the fans expect it!". Cersei is expressing their disappointment.

    – user568458
    2 hours ago














21












21








21







It seems they were a kind of Easter-Egg.



In the novels, we received a long narrative about the elephants of The Golden Company, which was left out of the show.




In George R. R. Martin’s fifth GOT novel, A Dance With Dragons, we learn of The Golden Company through a rather long-winded side story that has thankfully been cut from the HBO show lest it get even more complicated. Someone in the writer’s room clearly wasn’t happy with this decision, and so decided to throw in an elephant-sized easter egg for viewers who have also read the series so far.




Cersei’s need for elephants in the Game Of Thrones premiere comes directly from the books - Metro UK




So, it seems like this is a special Easter-Egg for those who have read the series.






share|improve this answer















It seems they were a kind of Easter-Egg.



In the novels, we received a long narrative about the elephants of The Golden Company, which was left out of the show.




In George R. R. Martin’s fifth GOT novel, A Dance With Dragons, we learn of The Golden Company through a rather long-winded side story that has thankfully been cut from the HBO show lest it get even more complicated. Someone in the writer’s room clearly wasn’t happy with this decision, and so decided to throw in an elephant-sized easter egg for viewers who have also read the series so far.




Cersei’s need for elephants in the Game Of Thrones premiere comes directly from the books - Metro UK




So, it seems like this is a special Easter-Egg for those who have read the series.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 10 hours ago

























answered 10 hours ago









NifflerNiffler

2,9562329




2,9562329







  • 3





    I sooo wanted Aegon VI to come charging out on an Elephant. Surprise fellow-Valyrians!

    – Aegon
    10 hours ago






  • 1





    I'd assumed that they mentioned elephants at the end of Season 7 because the producers wanted to pressure HBO into providing enough budget for real elephants. "We need elephants, the fans expect it!". Cersei is expressing their disappointment.

    – user568458
    2 hours ago













  • 3





    I sooo wanted Aegon VI to come charging out on an Elephant. Surprise fellow-Valyrians!

    – Aegon
    10 hours ago






  • 1





    I'd assumed that they mentioned elephants at the end of Season 7 because the producers wanted to pressure HBO into providing enough budget for real elephants. "We need elephants, the fans expect it!". Cersei is expressing their disappointment.

    – user568458
    2 hours ago








3




3





I sooo wanted Aegon VI to come charging out on an Elephant. Surprise fellow-Valyrians!

– Aegon
10 hours ago





I sooo wanted Aegon VI to come charging out on an Elephant. Surprise fellow-Valyrians!

– Aegon
10 hours ago




1




1





I'd assumed that they mentioned elephants at the end of Season 7 because the producers wanted to pressure HBO into providing enough budget for real elephants. "We need elephants, the fans expect it!". Cersei is expressing their disappointment.

– user568458
2 hours ago






I'd assumed that they mentioned elephants at the end of Season 7 because the producers wanted to pressure HBO into providing enough budget for real elephants. "We need elephants, the fans expect it!". Cersei is expressing their disappointment.

– user568458
2 hours ago












9














Elephants are always a funny kind of weapon



Having a big weapon on your side is a terrible advantage. Elephant is a good historical example: while they don't deal a lot of damage per se, they are terrible for enemy morale. You can only have a few, and each of them won't deal a lot of damage. But if you are on the other side, that's another topic.



Gosh, an elephant charging me! Ok, so if we all keep the formation, the elephant will crush on our spear formation. Sure, there will be casualties, but we will win. The only thing we had to do is keep our formation. Hey, what is Joe doing? he can't escape the battle, can he? Whatever, he was a coward. We can keep formation without him. But, wait, Jack is also fleeing! He was the best of us. If even he thinks we are lost... But we need to keep the formation! Oh, no, some others are also running. The formation just broke up, the odds are very bad for me. Yep, better run for my life.



Even if the elephant wouldn't do that much damage, it crushes the enemy formation, and you can now deal much more damage.



Why on earth wouldn(t you want such a weapon?



sure, the enemy also have a huge weapon. but that won't ensure you that the foot soldiers will keep the formation.



And it's because she doesn't have dragons that she wants a similar, smaller armed animal that can afraid the enemy.



So that we don't expect elephants



Golden company is well-known for their elephants. Harry Strickland is proud of them, and as it's the final season, we expect massive battles. This scene is also a way for showrunners to tell the spectators to don't expect any elephant. Sorry, all CGI budget was burned on dragons.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    The won't deal a lot of damage part depends on the strategy and the elephants, the Oliphaunts in Lord of the rings did a lot of damage.

    – Gustavo Gabriel
    10 hours ago







  • 6





    The oliphaunts were three times the height of elephants & carried huge "battle scythes" like living combined-harvesters, because their outsized tusks could sweep the ground.

    – Tetsujin
    9 hours ago






  • 2





    Elephants were very easy to defeat because they have a strong self-preservation instinct; give elephants a way to escape the battle (by, say, causing your formation to have large, safe gaps) and they take it. Until the Romans figured that out, though, elephants were extremely difficult to deal with.

    – Michael W.
    9 hours ago






  • 3





    @Tetsujin The LOTR Oliphaunts weren't elephants; they were Ultralisks!

    – Mason Wheeler
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    Paper beats rock, rock beats scissors, flaming pigs beat elephants.

    – Jeff Lambert
    7 hours ago















9














Elephants are always a funny kind of weapon



Having a big weapon on your side is a terrible advantage. Elephant is a good historical example: while they don't deal a lot of damage per se, they are terrible for enemy morale. You can only have a few, and each of them won't deal a lot of damage. But if you are on the other side, that's another topic.



Gosh, an elephant charging me! Ok, so if we all keep the formation, the elephant will crush on our spear formation. Sure, there will be casualties, but we will win. The only thing we had to do is keep our formation. Hey, what is Joe doing? he can't escape the battle, can he? Whatever, he was a coward. We can keep formation without him. But, wait, Jack is also fleeing! He was the best of us. If even he thinks we are lost... But we need to keep the formation! Oh, no, some others are also running. The formation just broke up, the odds are very bad for me. Yep, better run for my life.



Even if the elephant wouldn't do that much damage, it crushes the enemy formation, and you can now deal much more damage.



Why on earth wouldn(t you want such a weapon?



sure, the enemy also have a huge weapon. but that won't ensure you that the foot soldiers will keep the formation.



And it's because she doesn't have dragons that she wants a similar, smaller armed animal that can afraid the enemy.



So that we don't expect elephants



Golden company is well-known for their elephants. Harry Strickland is proud of them, and as it's the final season, we expect massive battles. This scene is also a way for showrunners to tell the spectators to don't expect any elephant. Sorry, all CGI budget was burned on dragons.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    The won't deal a lot of damage part depends on the strategy and the elephants, the Oliphaunts in Lord of the rings did a lot of damage.

    – Gustavo Gabriel
    10 hours ago







  • 6





    The oliphaunts were three times the height of elephants & carried huge "battle scythes" like living combined-harvesters, because their outsized tusks could sweep the ground.

    – Tetsujin
    9 hours ago






  • 2





    Elephants were very easy to defeat because they have a strong self-preservation instinct; give elephants a way to escape the battle (by, say, causing your formation to have large, safe gaps) and they take it. Until the Romans figured that out, though, elephants were extremely difficult to deal with.

    – Michael W.
    9 hours ago






  • 3





    @Tetsujin The LOTR Oliphaunts weren't elephants; they were Ultralisks!

    – Mason Wheeler
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    Paper beats rock, rock beats scissors, flaming pigs beat elephants.

    – Jeff Lambert
    7 hours ago













9












9








9







Elephants are always a funny kind of weapon



Having a big weapon on your side is a terrible advantage. Elephant is a good historical example: while they don't deal a lot of damage per se, they are terrible for enemy morale. You can only have a few, and each of them won't deal a lot of damage. But if you are on the other side, that's another topic.



Gosh, an elephant charging me! Ok, so if we all keep the formation, the elephant will crush on our spear formation. Sure, there will be casualties, but we will win. The only thing we had to do is keep our formation. Hey, what is Joe doing? he can't escape the battle, can he? Whatever, he was a coward. We can keep formation without him. But, wait, Jack is also fleeing! He was the best of us. If even he thinks we are lost... But we need to keep the formation! Oh, no, some others are also running. The formation just broke up, the odds are very bad for me. Yep, better run for my life.



Even if the elephant wouldn't do that much damage, it crushes the enemy formation, and you can now deal much more damage.



Why on earth wouldn(t you want such a weapon?



sure, the enemy also have a huge weapon. but that won't ensure you that the foot soldiers will keep the formation.



And it's because she doesn't have dragons that she wants a similar, smaller armed animal that can afraid the enemy.



So that we don't expect elephants



Golden company is well-known for their elephants. Harry Strickland is proud of them, and as it's the final season, we expect massive battles. This scene is also a way for showrunners to tell the spectators to don't expect any elephant. Sorry, all CGI budget was burned on dragons.






share|improve this answer













Elephants are always a funny kind of weapon



Having a big weapon on your side is a terrible advantage. Elephant is a good historical example: while they don't deal a lot of damage per se, they are terrible for enemy morale. You can only have a few, and each of them won't deal a lot of damage. But if you are on the other side, that's another topic.



Gosh, an elephant charging me! Ok, so if we all keep the formation, the elephant will crush on our spear formation. Sure, there will be casualties, but we will win. The only thing we had to do is keep our formation. Hey, what is Joe doing? he can't escape the battle, can he? Whatever, he was a coward. We can keep formation without him. But, wait, Jack is also fleeing! He was the best of us. If even he thinks we are lost... But we need to keep the formation! Oh, no, some others are also running. The formation just broke up, the odds are very bad for me. Yep, better run for my life.



Even if the elephant wouldn't do that much damage, it crushes the enemy formation, and you can now deal much more damage.



Why on earth wouldn(t you want such a weapon?



sure, the enemy also have a huge weapon. but that won't ensure you that the foot soldiers will keep the formation.



And it's because she doesn't have dragons that she wants a similar, smaller armed animal that can afraid the enemy.



So that we don't expect elephants



Golden company is well-known for their elephants. Harry Strickland is proud of them, and as it's the final season, we expect massive battles. This scene is also a way for showrunners to tell the spectators to don't expect any elephant. Sorry, all CGI budget was burned on dragons.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 11 hours ago









KepotxKepotx

644410




644410







  • 1





    The won't deal a lot of damage part depends on the strategy and the elephants, the Oliphaunts in Lord of the rings did a lot of damage.

    – Gustavo Gabriel
    10 hours ago







  • 6





    The oliphaunts were three times the height of elephants & carried huge "battle scythes" like living combined-harvesters, because their outsized tusks could sweep the ground.

    – Tetsujin
    9 hours ago






  • 2





    Elephants were very easy to defeat because they have a strong self-preservation instinct; give elephants a way to escape the battle (by, say, causing your formation to have large, safe gaps) and they take it. Until the Romans figured that out, though, elephants were extremely difficult to deal with.

    – Michael W.
    9 hours ago






  • 3





    @Tetsujin The LOTR Oliphaunts weren't elephants; they were Ultralisks!

    – Mason Wheeler
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    Paper beats rock, rock beats scissors, flaming pigs beat elephants.

    – Jeff Lambert
    7 hours ago












  • 1





    The won't deal a lot of damage part depends on the strategy and the elephants, the Oliphaunts in Lord of the rings did a lot of damage.

    – Gustavo Gabriel
    10 hours ago







  • 6





    The oliphaunts were three times the height of elephants & carried huge "battle scythes" like living combined-harvesters, because their outsized tusks could sweep the ground.

    – Tetsujin
    9 hours ago






  • 2





    Elephants were very easy to defeat because they have a strong self-preservation instinct; give elephants a way to escape the battle (by, say, causing your formation to have large, safe gaps) and they take it. Until the Romans figured that out, though, elephants were extremely difficult to deal with.

    – Michael W.
    9 hours ago






  • 3





    @Tetsujin The LOTR Oliphaunts weren't elephants; they were Ultralisks!

    – Mason Wheeler
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    Paper beats rock, rock beats scissors, flaming pigs beat elephants.

    – Jeff Lambert
    7 hours ago







1




1





The won't deal a lot of damage part depends on the strategy and the elephants, the Oliphaunts in Lord of the rings did a lot of damage.

– Gustavo Gabriel
10 hours ago






The won't deal a lot of damage part depends on the strategy and the elephants, the Oliphaunts in Lord of the rings did a lot of damage.

– Gustavo Gabriel
10 hours ago





6




6





The oliphaunts were three times the height of elephants & carried huge "battle scythes" like living combined-harvesters, because their outsized tusks could sweep the ground.

– Tetsujin
9 hours ago





The oliphaunts were three times the height of elephants & carried huge "battle scythes" like living combined-harvesters, because their outsized tusks could sweep the ground.

– Tetsujin
9 hours ago




2




2





Elephants were very easy to defeat because they have a strong self-preservation instinct; give elephants a way to escape the battle (by, say, causing your formation to have large, safe gaps) and they take it. Until the Romans figured that out, though, elephants were extremely difficult to deal with.

– Michael W.
9 hours ago





Elephants were very easy to defeat because they have a strong self-preservation instinct; give elephants a way to escape the battle (by, say, causing your formation to have large, safe gaps) and they take it. Until the Romans figured that out, though, elephants were extremely difficult to deal with.

– Michael W.
9 hours ago




3




3





@Tetsujin The LOTR Oliphaunts weren't elephants; they were Ultralisks!

– Mason Wheeler
8 hours ago





@Tetsujin The LOTR Oliphaunts weren't elephants; they were Ultralisks!

– Mason Wheeler
8 hours ago




2




2





Paper beats rock, rock beats scissors, flaming pigs beat elephants.

– Jeff Lambert
7 hours ago





Paper beats rock, rock beats scissors, flaming pigs beat elephants.

– Jeff Lambert
7 hours ago



-character, game-of-thrones

Popular posts from this blog

2017 IndyCar Series Contents Series news Teams and drivers Schedule Season summary Footnotes References External links Navigation menu"INDYCAR: Initial 2018 bodywork concepts unveiled"the original"IndyCar confirms switch to Performance Friction brakes in 2017""AJ Foyt Racing will switch to Chevy"the original"Carlos Munoz, Conor Daly will drive for AJ Foyt Racing""Zach Veach's Indy 500 Debut Confirmed with Foyt""No mass exodus from Honda after Ganassi switch""Ex-F1 driver Sato joins Andretti Autosport for 2017 IndyCar season""IndyCar's Ryan Hunter-Reay, sponsor DHL paired through 2020""hhgregg and Andretti Autosport announce partnership for key races in 2016""INDYCAR: Rossi re-signs with Andretti"the original"McLaren Formula 1 - Fernando Alonso to race at Indy 500 with McLaren, Honda and Andretti Autosport""Shank will finally take part in Indy 500 with Harvey, Andretti | MotorSportsTalk""Andretti adds Jack Harvey to Indy 500 field""Ganassi switches to Honda power for 2017""INDYCAR: Chilton returns to Ganassi"the original"IndyCar silly season: Who's going where in 2017?""INDYCAR: Kanaan, NTT Data return to Ganassi"the original"Kimball to remain at Ganassi for 2017""Coyne confirms Bourdais for 2017 IndyCar season""Davison to sub for Bourdais in Indy 500"the original"Gutierrez confirmed for Detroit IndyCar debut""Gutierrez returns with Coyne for rest of 2017 season""Vautier to drive for Coyne at Texas"the original"INDYCAR: Coyne confirms Jones for 2017"the original"Pippa Mann returns to Coyne for Indy 500""Karam, Dreyer & Reinbold teaming up again for Indianapolis 500""Pigot to return to Ed Carpenter Racing""Hildebrand confirmed as full-time Ed Carpenter driver""Veach to replace injured Hildebrand at Barber"the originalNew Team Harding Racing Enters Chaves for 101st Indianapolis 500"Juncos Racing Announces Entry in 101st Running of the Indianapolis 500 :: Juncos Racing""Juncos confirms Pigot for Indy 500""Saavedra confirmed in Juncos' second 500 entry"the original"Lazier confirms Indy 500 run after son's USF2000 debut"the original"Claman DeMelo to race for RLLR at Sonoma"the original"Rahal signs Servia and ace engineer for 2017""IndyCar: Aleshin returns with Schmidt"the original"Aleshin replaced by Saavedra for Toronto""Jack Harvey will pilot SPM No. 7 car at Watkins Glen, Sonoma""Jay Howard confirmed in Tony Stewart's supported SPM Indy entry""INDYCAR: Newgarden to wave the flag at Penske"the original"Pagenaud opts for No. 1 in 2017"the original"Penske confirms Newgarden for 2017""Montoya to stay with Team Penske in 2017""Target leaving IndyCar after 27 seasons with Chip Ganassi""Cavin: IndyCar could see complete driver/team shakeup in 2017""End of the road for KV Racing?""KV Racing confirms closure, equipment sold to Juncos""Juncos confirms IndyCar Series entry"the original"Juncos readies IndyCar program, aims for '17 500"the original"Harding Racing to add Texas, Pocono to schedule"the original"Sato signs with Andretti Autosport for 2017""INDYCAR: Aleshin in Doubt at SPM"the original"Long Beach notebook: JR Hildebrand breaks hand""Hildebrand cleared to return at Phoenix"the original"Bourdais to undergo surgery on multiple fractures""Aleshin loses Schmidt Peterson IndyCar ride""Saavedra in at SPM for Pocono, Gateway"the original"Bourdais to make return at Gateway"the original"The IndyCar Grand Prix no longer is sponsored by Angie's List""2017 IndyCar Series rulebook""2017 Verizon IndyCar Series Official Rulebook"Official websiteeeeee

Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god existsWord for having a definite opinion while simultaneously withholding judgment?What's the opposite of “newcomer? Is ”veteran" OK?What do you call an “atheist” who might believe in an afterlife?What's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Word for someone who dismisses contrary opinions as irrational?Somone who thinks they are overly special/out of the ordinaryIs there a word, phrase or idiom for “a person who is incapable of thinking about the future”?The belief that a god is human-likeA word for a non-famous person/thing you have heard a lot aboutAdjective for a person who enjoys taking care of their appearance

Can I sign legal documents with a smiley face?Do Legal Documents Require Signing In Standard Pen Colors?Is it possible to legally prohibit someone from linking to specific pages on your website?Do scans of signed documents have the same legal power as the original document?What can I do if I signed an excessively restrictive contract?Can other party sneak in new contract terms via termination notice?How to prove that someone forged my signature on a contract that I was not aware of?In Australia, Is it legal to sign a document as somebody else?making a contract that includes video licenceLease dispute, over email and text messageIf you must include all of the natural language prose in a legal document, or if it can be abstracted outE-signing: legal ramifications of “identifying” a person