Why does udev concatenate two symlinks? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) 2019 Community Moderator Election Results Why I closed the “Why is Kali so hard” questionHow to troubleshoot udev not creating /dev/hda3 on gentoo boot?udev re-numbering when creating symlinksSymlinks on /dev/ttyUSB* via udevudev does not apply rulesWhat are these symlinks in /run/udev/watch?confused about udevadm usageudev in two stepsPersistent names for physical USB portsDevice Node not createdCreating Persistant Symbolic Link -Linux

Withdrew £2800, but only £2000 shows as withdrawn on online banking; what are my obligations?

Using et al. for a last / senior author rather than for a first author

How can I use the Python library networkx from Mathematica?

If my PI received research grants from a company to be able to pay my postdoc salary, did I have a potential conflict interest too?

Is "Reachable Object" really an NP-complete problem?

How to Make a Beautiful Stacked 3D Plot

Would "destroying" Wurmcoil Engine prevent its tokens from being created?

For a new assistant professor in CS, how to build/manage a publication pipeline

Is CEO the profession with the most psychopaths?

How do I make this wiring inside cabinet safer? (Pic)

Is there such thing as an Availability Group failover trigger?

How do I find out the mythology and history of my Fortress?

Maximum summed powersets with non-adjacent items

Is the Standard Deduction better than Itemized when both are the same amount?

What is the meaning of the new sigil in Game of Thrones Season 8 intro?

Can a new player join a group only when a new campaign starts?

What would be the ideal power source for a cybernetic eye?

How to find all the available tools in mac terminal?

Do I really need recursive chmod to restrict access to a folder?

Most bit efficient text communication method?

Should I use a zero-interest credit card for a large one-time purchase?

What causes the direction of lightning flashes?

Fundamental Solution of the Pell Equation

Chinese Seal on silk painting - what does it mean?



Why does udev concatenate two symlinks?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
2019 Community Moderator Election Results
Why I closed the “Why is Kali so hard” questionHow to troubleshoot udev not creating /dev/hda3 on gentoo boot?udev re-numbering when creating symlinksSymlinks on /dev/ttyUSB* via udevudev does not apply rulesWhat are these symlinks in /run/udev/watch?confused about udevadm usageudev in two stepsPersistent names for physical USB portsDevice Node not createdCreating Persistant Symbolic Link -Linux



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1















My distribution is SLES 12 SP 2.



I work with DRBD (distributed replicated block device) right now. Here is an example of a configuration for a drbd resource.



resource HA1dat 
device /dev/drbd1;
disk /dev/mqdat/HA1;
meta-disk internal;
on srv0
address 192.168.174.10:7000;
node-id 0;

on srv1
address 192.168.174.11:7000;
node-id 1;

on srv9
address 192.168.174.19:7000;
node-id 2;

connection-mesh
hosts srv0 srv1 srv9;




After activating this resource as a drbd device, normally the following objects are created.



brw-rw---- 1 root disk 147, 1 Feb 13 19:41 /dev/drbd1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Feb 13 19:41 /dev/drbd/by-res/HA1dat/0 -> ../../../drbd1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Feb 13 19:41 /dev/drbd/by-disk/mqdat/HA1 -> ../../../drbd1


These are the block device itself and two symbolic links to it.



This is the correct behaviour!



On some other servers (same distribution) the behaviour is different. The configuration of the drbd resource is very similiar.



resource LN0N001Edat 
device /dev/drbd1;
disk /dev/data1vg/LN0N001E_lv;
meta-disk internal;
on sedcmmwd0030
address xxx.yyy.zzz.83:7000;
node-id 0;

on sedcmmwd0040
address xxx.yyy.zzz.99:7000;
node-id 1;

on sedcmmwd0050
address xxx.yyy.zzz.100:7000;
node-id 2;

connection-mesh
hosts sedcmmwd0030 sedcmmwd0040 sedcmmwd0050;




After activating this resource, only the block device and one link are created.



brw-rw---- 1 root disk 147, 1 Mar 2 09:49 /dev/drbd1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Mar 2 09:49 /dev/drbd/by-res/LN0N001Edat/0_drbd/by-disk/data1vg/LN0N001E_lv -> ../../../../../../drbd1


This is the problem! This link is a concatenation of the two expected links. I have no idea, why they are concatenated.



The link is created by udev. The following output show differences, what udev does on these nodes.



Server with correct behaviour



juser@srv0:~> udevadm info /dev/drbd1
P: /devices/virtual/block/drbd1
N: drbd1
S: drbd/by-disk/mqdat/HA1
S: drbd/by-res/HA1dat/0
E: DEVICE=drbd1
E: DEVLINKS=/dev/drbd/by-res/HA1dat/0 /dev/drbd/by-disk/mqdat/HA1
E: DEVNAME=/dev/drbd1
E: DEVPATH=/devices/virtual/block/drbd1
E: DEVTYPE=disk
E: MAJOR=147
E: MINOR=1
E: SUBSYSTEM=block
E: SYMLINK=drbd/by-res/HA1dat/0 drbd/by-disk/mqdat/HA1
E: TAGS=:systemd:
E: USEC_INITIALIZED=12263844870


Server with the problem



root@sedcmmwd0030:/root : udevadm info /dev/drbd1
P: /devices/virtual/block/drbd1
N: drbd1
S: drbd/by-res/LN0N001Edat/0_drbd/by-disk/data1vg/LN0N001E_lv
E: DEVICE=drbd1
E: DEVLINKS=/dev/drbd/by-res/LN0N001Edat/0_drbd/by-disk/data1vg/LN0N001E_lv
E: DEVNAME=/dev/drbd1
E: DEVPATH=/devices/virtual/block/drbd1
E: DEVTYPE=disk
E: MAJOR=147
E: MINOR=1
E: SUBSYSTEM=block
E: SYMLINK=drbd/by-res/LN0N001Edat/0 drbd/by-disk/data1vg/LN0N001E_lv
E: TAGS=:systemd:
E: USEC_INITIALIZED=1212108486973


The SYMLINK lines are still both correct. The differences start with the DEVLINKS lines.



The rules for drbd are the same in both cases
cat /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/65-drbd.rules
# This file contains the rules to create named DRBD devices.



SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="drbd_end"
KERNEL!="drbd*", GOTO="drbd_end"

IMPORTprogram="/sbin/drbdadm sh-udev minor-%m"

# Use symlink from the environment if available
ENVSYMLINK!="", SYMLINK="$envSYMLINK", GOTO="have_symlink"

# Legacy rules for older DRBD 8.3 & 8.4 when drbdadm sh-udev did not yet export SYMLINK
ENVDISK!="", SYMLINK+="drbd/by-disk/$envDISK"
ENVRESOURCE!="", SYMLINK+="drbd/by-res/$envRESOURCE"

LABEL="have_symlink"

ENVDEVICE=="drbd_?*", SYMLINK+="$envDEVICE"

LABEL="drbd_end"


Does anybody have an explanation for the creation of the errorneous link?










share|improve this question




























    1















    My distribution is SLES 12 SP 2.



    I work with DRBD (distributed replicated block device) right now. Here is an example of a configuration for a drbd resource.



    resource HA1dat 
    device /dev/drbd1;
    disk /dev/mqdat/HA1;
    meta-disk internal;
    on srv0
    address 192.168.174.10:7000;
    node-id 0;

    on srv1
    address 192.168.174.11:7000;
    node-id 1;

    on srv9
    address 192.168.174.19:7000;
    node-id 2;

    connection-mesh
    hosts srv0 srv1 srv9;




    After activating this resource as a drbd device, normally the following objects are created.



    brw-rw---- 1 root disk 147, 1 Feb 13 19:41 /dev/drbd1
    lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Feb 13 19:41 /dev/drbd/by-res/HA1dat/0 -> ../../../drbd1
    lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Feb 13 19:41 /dev/drbd/by-disk/mqdat/HA1 -> ../../../drbd1


    These are the block device itself and two symbolic links to it.



    This is the correct behaviour!



    On some other servers (same distribution) the behaviour is different. The configuration of the drbd resource is very similiar.



    resource LN0N001Edat 
    device /dev/drbd1;
    disk /dev/data1vg/LN0N001E_lv;
    meta-disk internal;
    on sedcmmwd0030
    address xxx.yyy.zzz.83:7000;
    node-id 0;

    on sedcmmwd0040
    address xxx.yyy.zzz.99:7000;
    node-id 1;

    on sedcmmwd0050
    address xxx.yyy.zzz.100:7000;
    node-id 2;

    connection-mesh
    hosts sedcmmwd0030 sedcmmwd0040 sedcmmwd0050;




    After activating this resource, only the block device and one link are created.



    brw-rw---- 1 root disk 147, 1 Mar 2 09:49 /dev/drbd1
    lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Mar 2 09:49 /dev/drbd/by-res/LN0N001Edat/0_drbd/by-disk/data1vg/LN0N001E_lv -> ../../../../../../drbd1


    This is the problem! This link is a concatenation of the two expected links. I have no idea, why they are concatenated.



    The link is created by udev. The following output show differences, what udev does on these nodes.



    Server with correct behaviour



    juser@srv0:~> udevadm info /dev/drbd1
    P: /devices/virtual/block/drbd1
    N: drbd1
    S: drbd/by-disk/mqdat/HA1
    S: drbd/by-res/HA1dat/0
    E: DEVICE=drbd1
    E: DEVLINKS=/dev/drbd/by-res/HA1dat/0 /dev/drbd/by-disk/mqdat/HA1
    E: DEVNAME=/dev/drbd1
    E: DEVPATH=/devices/virtual/block/drbd1
    E: DEVTYPE=disk
    E: MAJOR=147
    E: MINOR=1
    E: SUBSYSTEM=block
    E: SYMLINK=drbd/by-res/HA1dat/0 drbd/by-disk/mqdat/HA1
    E: TAGS=:systemd:
    E: USEC_INITIALIZED=12263844870


    Server with the problem



    root@sedcmmwd0030:/root : udevadm info /dev/drbd1
    P: /devices/virtual/block/drbd1
    N: drbd1
    S: drbd/by-res/LN0N001Edat/0_drbd/by-disk/data1vg/LN0N001E_lv
    E: DEVICE=drbd1
    E: DEVLINKS=/dev/drbd/by-res/LN0N001Edat/0_drbd/by-disk/data1vg/LN0N001E_lv
    E: DEVNAME=/dev/drbd1
    E: DEVPATH=/devices/virtual/block/drbd1
    E: DEVTYPE=disk
    E: MAJOR=147
    E: MINOR=1
    E: SUBSYSTEM=block
    E: SYMLINK=drbd/by-res/LN0N001Edat/0 drbd/by-disk/data1vg/LN0N001E_lv
    E: TAGS=:systemd:
    E: USEC_INITIALIZED=1212108486973


    The SYMLINK lines are still both correct. The differences start with the DEVLINKS lines.



    The rules for drbd are the same in both cases
    cat /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/65-drbd.rules
    # This file contains the rules to create named DRBD devices.



    SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="drbd_end"
    KERNEL!="drbd*", GOTO="drbd_end"

    IMPORTprogram="/sbin/drbdadm sh-udev minor-%m"

    # Use symlink from the environment if available
    ENVSYMLINK!="", SYMLINK="$envSYMLINK", GOTO="have_symlink"

    # Legacy rules for older DRBD 8.3 & 8.4 when drbdadm sh-udev did not yet export SYMLINK
    ENVDISK!="", SYMLINK+="drbd/by-disk/$envDISK"
    ENVRESOURCE!="", SYMLINK+="drbd/by-res/$envRESOURCE"

    LABEL="have_symlink"

    ENVDEVICE=="drbd_?*", SYMLINK+="$envDEVICE"

    LABEL="drbd_end"


    Does anybody have an explanation for the creation of the errorneous link?










    share|improve this question
























      1












      1








      1








      My distribution is SLES 12 SP 2.



      I work with DRBD (distributed replicated block device) right now. Here is an example of a configuration for a drbd resource.



      resource HA1dat 
      device /dev/drbd1;
      disk /dev/mqdat/HA1;
      meta-disk internal;
      on srv0
      address 192.168.174.10:7000;
      node-id 0;

      on srv1
      address 192.168.174.11:7000;
      node-id 1;

      on srv9
      address 192.168.174.19:7000;
      node-id 2;

      connection-mesh
      hosts srv0 srv1 srv9;




      After activating this resource as a drbd device, normally the following objects are created.



      brw-rw---- 1 root disk 147, 1 Feb 13 19:41 /dev/drbd1
      lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Feb 13 19:41 /dev/drbd/by-res/HA1dat/0 -> ../../../drbd1
      lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Feb 13 19:41 /dev/drbd/by-disk/mqdat/HA1 -> ../../../drbd1


      These are the block device itself and two symbolic links to it.



      This is the correct behaviour!



      On some other servers (same distribution) the behaviour is different. The configuration of the drbd resource is very similiar.



      resource LN0N001Edat 
      device /dev/drbd1;
      disk /dev/data1vg/LN0N001E_lv;
      meta-disk internal;
      on sedcmmwd0030
      address xxx.yyy.zzz.83:7000;
      node-id 0;

      on sedcmmwd0040
      address xxx.yyy.zzz.99:7000;
      node-id 1;

      on sedcmmwd0050
      address xxx.yyy.zzz.100:7000;
      node-id 2;

      connection-mesh
      hosts sedcmmwd0030 sedcmmwd0040 sedcmmwd0050;




      After activating this resource, only the block device and one link are created.



      brw-rw---- 1 root disk 147, 1 Mar 2 09:49 /dev/drbd1
      lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Mar 2 09:49 /dev/drbd/by-res/LN0N001Edat/0_drbd/by-disk/data1vg/LN0N001E_lv -> ../../../../../../drbd1


      This is the problem! This link is a concatenation of the two expected links. I have no idea, why they are concatenated.



      The link is created by udev. The following output show differences, what udev does on these nodes.



      Server with correct behaviour



      juser@srv0:~> udevadm info /dev/drbd1
      P: /devices/virtual/block/drbd1
      N: drbd1
      S: drbd/by-disk/mqdat/HA1
      S: drbd/by-res/HA1dat/0
      E: DEVICE=drbd1
      E: DEVLINKS=/dev/drbd/by-res/HA1dat/0 /dev/drbd/by-disk/mqdat/HA1
      E: DEVNAME=/dev/drbd1
      E: DEVPATH=/devices/virtual/block/drbd1
      E: DEVTYPE=disk
      E: MAJOR=147
      E: MINOR=1
      E: SUBSYSTEM=block
      E: SYMLINK=drbd/by-res/HA1dat/0 drbd/by-disk/mqdat/HA1
      E: TAGS=:systemd:
      E: USEC_INITIALIZED=12263844870


      Server with the problem



      root@sedcmmwd0030:/root : udevadm info /dev/drbd1
      P: /devices/virtual/block/drbd1
      N: drbd1
      S: drbd/by-res/LN0N001Edat/0_drbd/by-disk/data1vg/LN0N001E_lv
      E: DEVICE=drbd1
      E: DEVLINKS=/dev/drbd/by-res/LN0N001Edat/0_drbd/by-disk/data1vg/LN0N001E_lv
      E: DEVNAME=/dev/drbd1
      E: DEVPATH=/devices/virtual/block/drbd1
      E: DEVTYPE=disk
      E: MAJOR=147
      E: MINOR=1
      E: SUBSYSTEM=block
      E: SYMLINK=drbd/by-res/LN0N001Edat/0 drbd/by-disk/data1vg/LN0N001E_lv
      E: TAGS=:systemd:
      E: USEC_INITIALIZED=1212108486973


      The SYMLINK lines are still both correct. The differences start with the DEVLINKS lines.



      The rules for drbd are the same in both cases
      cat /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/65-drbd.rules
      # This file contains the rules to create named DRBD devices.



      SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="drbd_end"
      KERNEL!="drbd*", GOTO="drbd_end"

      IMPORTprogram="/sbin/drbdadm sh-udev minor-%m"

      # Use symlink from the environment if available
      ENVSYMLINK!="", SYMLINK="$envSYMLINK", GOTO="have_symlink"

      # Legacy rules for older DRBD 8.3 & 8.4 when drbdadm sh-udev did not yet export SYMLINK
      ENVDISK!="", SYMLINK+="drbd/by-disk/$envDISK"
      ENVRESOURCE!="", SYMLINK+="drbd/by-res/$envRESOURCE"

      LABEL="have_symlink"

      ENVDEVICE=="drbd_?*", SYMLINK+="$envDEVICE"

      LABEL="drbd_end"


      Does anybody have an explanation for the creation of the errorneous link?










      share|improve this question














      My distribution is SLES 12 SP 2.



      I work with DRBD (distributed replicated block device) right now. Here is an example of a configuration for a drbd resource.



      resource HA1dat 
      device /dev/drbd1;
      disk /dev/mqdat/HA1;
      meta-disk internal;
      on srv0
      address 192.168.174.10:7000;
      node-id 0;

      on srv1
      address 192.168.174.11:7000;
      node-id 1;

      on srv9
      address 192.168.174.19:7000;
      node-id 2;

      connection-mesh
      hosts srv0 srv1 srv9;




      After activating this resource as a drbd device, normally the following objects are created.



      brw-rw---- 1 root disk 147, 1 Feb 13 19:41 /dev/drbd1
      lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Feb 13 19:41 /dev/drbd/by-res/HA1dat/0 -> ../../../drbd1
      lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Feb 13 19:41 /dev/drbd/by-disk/mqdat/HA1 -> ../../../drbd1


      These are the block device itself and two symbolic links to it.



      This is the correct behaviour!



      On some other servers (same distribution) the behaviour is different. The configuration of the drbd resource is very similiar.



      resource LN0N001Edat 
      device /dev/drbd1;
      disk /dev/data1vg/LN0N001E_lv;
      meta-disk internal;
      on sedcmmwd0030
      address xxx.yyy.zzz.83:7000;
      node-id 0;

      on sedcmmwd0040
      address xxx.yyy.zzz.99:7000;
      node-id 1;

      on sedcmmwd0050
      address xxx.yyy.zzz.100:7000;
      node-id 2;

      connection-mesh
      hosts sedcmmwd0030 sedcmmwd0040 sedcmmwd0050;




      After activating this resource, only the block device and one link are created.



      brw-rw---- 1 root disk 147, 1 Mar 2 09:49 /dev/drbd1
      lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Mar 2 09:49 /dev/drbd/by-res/LN0N001Edat/0_drbd/by-disk/data1vg/LN0N001E_lv -> ../../../../../../drbd1


      This is the problem! This link is a concatenation of the two expected links. I have no idea, why they are concatenated.



      The link is created by udev. The following output show differences, what udev does on these nodes.



      Server with correct behaviour



      juser@srv0:~> udevadm info /dev/drbd1
      P: /devices/virtual/block/drbd1
      N: drbd1
      S: drbd/by-disk/mqdat/HA1
      S: drbd/by-res/HA1dat/0
      E: DEVICE=drbd1
      E: DEVLINKS=/dev/drbd/by-res/HA1dat/0 /dev/drbd/by-disk/mqdat/HA1
      E: DEVNAME=/dev/drbd1
      E: DEVPATH=/devices/virtual/block/drbd1
      E: DEVTYPE=disk
      E: MAJOR=147
      E: MINOR=1
      E: SUBSYSTEM=block
      E: SYMLINK=drbd/by-res/HA1dat/0 drbd/by-disk/mqdat/HA1
      E: TAGS=:systemd:
      E: USEC_INITIALIZED=12263844870


      Server with the problem



      root@sedcmmwd0030:/root : udevadm info /dev/drbd1
      P: /devices/virtual/block/drbd1
      N: drbd1
      S: drbd/by-res/LN0N001Edat/0_drbd/by-disk/data1vg/LN0N001E_lv
      E: DEVICE=drbd1
      E: DEVLINKS=/dev/drbd/by-res/LN0N001Edat/0_drbd/by-disk/data1vg/LN0N001E_lv
      E: DEVNAME=/dev/drbd1
      E: DEVPATH=/devices/virtual/block/drbd1
      E: DEVTYPE=disk
      E: MAJOR=147
      E: MINOR=1
      E: SUBSYSTEM=block
      E: SYMLINK=drbd/by-res/LN0N001Edat/0 drbd/by-disk/data1vg/LN0N001E_lv
      E: TAGS=:systemd:
      E: USEC_INITIALIZED=1212108486973


      The SYMLINK lines are still both correct. The differences start with the DEVLINKS lines.



      The rules for drbd are the same in both cases
      cat /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/65-drbd.rules
      # This file contains the rules to create named DRBD devices.



      SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="drbd_end"
      KERNEL!="drbd*", GOTO="drbd_end"

      IMPORTprogram="/sbin/drbdadm sh-udev minor-%m"

      # Use symlink from the environment if available
      ENVSYMLINK!="", SYMLINK="$envSYMLINK", GOTO="have_symlink"

      # Legacy rules for older DRBD 8.3 & 8.4 when drbdadm sh-udev did not yet export SYMLINK
      ENVDISK!="", SYMLINK+="drbd/by-disk/$envDISK"
      ENVRESOURCE!="", SYMLINK+="drbd/by-res/$envRESOURCE"

      LABEL="have_symlink"

      ENVDEVICE=="drbd_?*", SYMLINK+="$envDEVICE"

      LABEL="drbd_end"


      Does anybody have an explanation for the creation of the errorneous link?







      symlink udev drbd






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Mar 6 '18 at 23:19









      JochemJochem

      83




      83




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          The udev rules for DRBD come from the drbd-utils. What version of DRBD utils do you have installed?



          The newest version, 9.2.2, includes additional rules with a comment from the devs that looks like it might address your issue:



          # This file contains the rules to create named DRBD devices.

          SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="drbd_end"
          KERNEL!="drbd*", GOTO="drbd_end"

          IMPORTprogram="@sbindir@/drbdadm sh-udev minor-%m"

          # Use symlink from the environment if available
          # some udev version thought it was a good idea to change a long established
          # default of string_escape=none to string_escape=replace :-/
          # therefore, recent enough drbdadm will no longer export space separated lists.
          ENVSYMLINK_BY_DISK!="", SYMLINK+="$envSYMLINK_BY_DISK"
          ENVSYMLINK_BY_RES!="", SYMLINK+="$envSYMLINK_BY_RES", GOTO="have_symlink"
          ENVSYMLINK!="", OPTIONS+="string_escape=none", SYMLINK="$envSYMLINK", GOTO="have_symlink"

          # Legacy rules for older DRBD 8.3 & 8.4 when drbdadm sh-udev did not yet export SYMLINK
          ENVDISK!="", SYMLINK+="drbd/by-disk/$envDISK"
          ENVRESOURCE!="", SYMLINK+="drbd/by-res/$envRESOURCE"

          LABEL="have_symlink"

          ENVDEVICE=="drbd_?*", SYMLINK+="$envDEVICE"

          LABEL="drbd_end"





          share|improve this answer

























          • Great! This solves exactly the problem. Thank you very much!

            – Jochem
            Mar 7 '18 at 20:39











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f428640%2fwhy-does-udev-concatenate-two-symlinks%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          The udev rules for DRBD come from the drbd-utils. What version of DRBD utils do you have installed?



          The newest version, 9.2.2, includes additional rules with a comment from the devs that looks like it might address your issue:



          # This file contains the rules to create named DRBD devices.

          SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="drbd_end"
          KERNEL!="drbd*", GOTO="drbd_end"

          IMPORTprogram="@sbindir@/drbdadm sh-udev minor-%m"

          # Use symlink from the environment if available
          # some udev version thought it was a good idea to change a long established
          # default of string_escape=none to string_escape=replace :-/
          # therefore, recent enough drbdadm will no longer export space separated lists.
          ENVSYMLINK_BY_DISK!="", SYMLINK+="$envSYMLINK_BY_DISK"
          ENVSYMLINK_BY_RES!="", SYMLINK+="$envSYMLINK_BY_RES", GOTO="have_symlink"
          ENVSYMLINK!="", OPTIONS+="string_escape=none", SYMLINK="$envSYMLINK", GOTO="have_symlink"

          # Legacy rules for older DRBD 8.3 & 8.4 when drbdadm sh-udev did not yet export SYMLINK
          ENVDISK!="", SYMLINK+="drbd/by-disk/$envDISK"
          ENVRESOURCE!="", SYMLINK+="drbd/by-res/$envRESOURCE"

          LABEL="have_symlink"

          ENVDEVICE=="drbd_?*", SYMLINK+="$envDEVICE"

          LABEL="drbd_end"





          share|improve this answer

























          • Great! This solves exactly the problem. Thank you very much!

            – Jochem
            Mar 7 '18 at 20:39















          0














          The udev rules for DRBD come from the drbd-utils. What version of DRBD utils do you have installed?



          The newest version, 9.2.2, includes additional rules with a comment from the devs that looks like it might address your issue:



          # This file contains the rules to create named DRBD devices.

          SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="drbd_end"
          KERNEL!="drbd*", GOTO="drbd_end"

          IMPORTprogram="@sbindir@/drbdadm sh-udev minor-%m"

          # Use symlink from the environment if available
          # some udev version thought it was a good idea to change a long established
          # default of string_escape=none to string_escape=replace :-/
          # therefore, recent enough drbdadm will no longer export space separated lists.
          ENVSYMLINK_BY_DISK!="", SYMLINK+="$envSYMLINK_BY_DISK"
          ENVSYMLINK_BY_RES!="", SYMLINK+="$envSYMLINK_BY_RES", GOTO="have_symlink"
          ENVSYMLINK!="", OPTIONS+="string_escape=none", SYMLINK="$envSYMLINK", GOTO="have_symlink"

          # Legacy rules for older DRBD 8.3 & 8.4 when drbdadm sh-udev did not yet export SYMLINK
          ENVDISK!="", SYMLINK+="drbd/by-disk/$envDISK"
          ENVRESOURCE!="", SYMLINK+="drbd/by-res/$envRESOURCE"

          LABEL="have_symlink"

          ENVDEVICE=="drbd_?*", SYMLINK+="$envDEVICE"

          LABEL="drbd_end"





          share|improve this answer

























          • Great! This solves exactly the problem. Thank you very much!

            – Jochem
            Mar 7 '18 at 20:39













          0












          0








          0







          The udev rules for DRBD come from the drbd-utils. What version of DRBD utils do you have installed?



          The newest version, 9.2.2, includes additional rules with a comment from the devs that looks like it might address your issue:



          # This file contains the rules to create named DRBD devices.

          SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="drbd_end"
          KERNEL!="drbd*", GOTO="drbd_end"

          IMPORTprogram="@sbindir@/drbdadm sh-udev minor-%m"

          # Use symlink from the environment if available
          # some udev version thought it was a good idea to change a long established
          # default of string_escape=none to string_escape=replace :-/
          # therefore, recent enough drbdadm will no longer export space separated lists.
          ENVSYMLINK_BY_DISK!="", SYMLINK+="$envSYMLINK_BY_DISK"
          ENVSYMLINK_BY_RES!="", SYMLINK+="$envSYMLINK_BY_RES", GOTO="have_symlink"
          ENVSYMLINK!="", OPTIONS+="string_escape=none", SYMLINK="$envSYMLINK", GOTO="have_symlink"

          # Legacy rules for older DRBD 8.3 & 8.4 when drbdadm sh-udev did not yet export SYMLINK
          ENVDISK!="", SYMLINK+="drbd/by-disk/$envDISK"
          ENVRESOURCE!="", SYMLINK+="drbd/by-res/$envRESOURCE"

          LABEL="have_symlink"

          ENVDEVICE=="drbd_?*", SYMLINK+="$envDEVICE"

          LABEL="drbd_end"





          share|improve this answer















          The udev rules for DRBD come from the drbd-utils. What version of DRBD utils do you have installed?



          The newest version, 9.2.2, includes additional rules with a comment from the devs that looks like it might address your issue:



          # This file contains the rules to create named DRBD devices.

          SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="drbd_end"
          KERNEL!="drbd*", GOTO="drbd_end"

          IMPORTprogram="@sbindir@/drbdadm sh-udev minor-%m"

          # Use symlink from the environment if available
          # some udev version thought it was a good idea to change a long established
          # default of string_escape=none to string_escape=replace :-/
          # therefore, recent enough drbdadm will no longer export space separated lists.
          ENVSYMLINK_BY_DISK!="", SYMLINK+="$envSYMLINK_BY_DISK"
          ENVSYMLINK_BY_RES!="", SYMLINK+="$envSYMLINK_BY_RES", GOTO="have_symlink"
          ENVSYMLINK!="", OPTIONS+="string_escape=none", SYMLINK="$envSYMLINK", GOTO="have_symlink"

          # Legacy rules for older DRBD 8.3 & 8.4 when drbdadm sh-udev did not yet export SYMLINK
          ENVDISK!="", SYMLINK+="drbd/by-disk/$envDISK"
          ENVRESOURCE!="", SYMLINK+="drbd/by-res/$envRESOURCE"

          LABEL="have_symlink"

          ENVDEVICE=="drbd_?*", SYMLINK+="$envDEVICE"

          LABEL="drbd_end"






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 10 hours ago









          Rui F Ribeiro

          42.1k1484142




          42.1k1484142










          answered Mar 7 '18 at 16:24









          Matt KereczmanMatt Kereczman

          56227




          56227












          • Great! This solves exactly the problem. Thank you very much!

            – Jochem
            Mar 7 '18 at 20:39

















          • Great! This solves exactly the problem. Thank you very much!

            – Jochem
            Mar 7 '18 at 20:39
















          Great! This solves exactly the problem. Thank you very much!

          – Jochem
          Mar 7 '18 at 20:39





          Great! This solves exactly the problem. Thank you very much!

          – Jochem
          Mar 7 '18 at 20:39

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f428640%2fwhy-does-udev-concatenate-two-symlinks%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -drbd, symlink, udev

          Popular posts from this blog

          Mobil Contents History Mobil brands Former Mobil brands Lukoil transaction Mobil UK Mobil Australia Mobil New Zealand Mobil Greece Mobil in Japan Mobil in Canada Mobil Egypt See also References External links Navigation menuwww.mobil.com"Mobil Corporation"the original"Our Houston campus""Business & Finance: Socony-Vacuum Corp.""Popular Mechanics""Lubrite Technologies""Exxon Mobil campus 'clearly happening'""Toledo Blade - Google News Archive Search""The Lion and the Moose - How 2 Executives Pulled off the Biggest Merger Ever""ExxonMobil Press Release""Lubricants""Archived copy"the original"Mobil 1™ and Mobil Super™ motor oil and synthetic motor oil - Mobil™ Motor Oils""Mobil Delvac""Mobil Industrial website""The State of Competition in Gasoline Marketing: The Effects of Refiner Operations at Retail""Mobil Travel Guide to become Forbes Travel Guide""Hotel Rankings: Forbes Merges with Mobil"the original"Jamieson oil industry history""Mobil news""Caltex pumps for control""Watchdog blocks Caltex bid""Exxon Mobil sells service station network""Mobil Oil New Zealand Limited is New Zealand's oldest oil company, with predecessor companies having first established a presence in the country in 1896""ExxonMobil subsidiaries have a business history in New Zealand stretching back more than 120 years. We are involved in petroleum refining and distribution and the marketing of fuels, lubricants and chemical products""Archived copy"the original"Exxon Mobil to Sell Its Japanese Arm for $3.9 Billion""Gas station merger will end Esso and Mobil's long run in Japan""Esso moves to affiliate itself with PC Optimum, no longer Aeroplan, in loyalty point switch""Mobil brand of gas stations to launch in Canada after deal for 213 Loblaws-owned locations""Mobil Nears Completion of Rebranding 200 Loblaw Gas Stations""Learn about ExxonMobil's operations in Egypt""Petrol and Diesel Service Stations in Egypt - Mobil"Official websiteExxon Mobil corporate websiteMobil Industrial official websiteeeeeeeeDA04275022275790-40000 0001 0860 5061n82045453134887257134887257

          Frič See also Navigation menuinternal link

          Identify plant with long narrow paired leaves and reddish stems Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?What is this plant with long sharp leaves? Is it a weed?What is this 3ft high, stalky plant, with mid sized narrow leaves?What is this young shrub with opposite ovate, crenate leaves and reddish stems?What is this plant with large broad serrated leaves?Identify this upright branching weed with long leaves and reddish stemsPlease help me identify this bulbous plant with long, broad leaves and white flowersWhat is this small annual with narrow gray/green leaves and rust colored daisy-type flowers?What is this chilli plant?Does anyone know what type of chilli plant this is?Help identify this plant