Who is eating data? Xargs?2019 Community Moderator ElectionXargs and rm with a *What's wrong with this xargs command?Piping nothing to xargsxargs -r0 vs xargs -0Format output of xargsxargs line too longechoing basename under xargs?Combining bash % with xargs %xargs -I optionBenefits of using xargs

Try Catch Block Affecting a Variable in an Enclosing Scope

Why does Captain Marvel assume the people on this planet know this?

Do any of the books contain (magic) items for animal companions?

Why is there a voltage between the mains ground and my radiator?

GPLv2 - licensing for commercial use

Is this combination of Quivering Palm and Haste RAW?

Do I really need to have a scientific explanation for my premise?

How do you like my writing?

Do items de-spawn in Diablo?

Could you please stop shuffling the deck and play already?

How do I express some one as a black person?

Meaning of ちはース as an exclamation

PTIJ: where are Tzafra and Urta located?

Is "history" a male-biased word ("his+story")?

When traveling to Europe from North America, do I need to purchase a different power strip?

Can Mathematica be used to create an Artistic 3D extrusion from a 2D image and wrap a line pattern around it?

Best approach to update all entries in a list that is paginated?

Accepted offer letter, position changed

Good allowance savings plan?

Should I take out a loan for a friend to invest on my behalf?

Is Gradient Descent central to every optimizer?

Does splitting a potentially monolithic application into several smaller ones help prevent bugs?

Conservation of Mass and Energy

infinitive telling the purpose



Who is eating data? Xargs?



2019 Community Moderator ElectionXargs and rm with a *What's wrong with this xargs command?Piping nothing to xargsxargs -r0 vs xargs -0Format output of xargsxargs line too longechoing basename under xargs?Combining bash % with xargs %xargs -I optionBenefits of using xargs










1















I am trying to parse a recursive directory of PHP files using the built in PHP linter, which works like this:



$ php -l good.php
No syntax errors detected in good.php

$ php -l bad.php
PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ''foo'' (T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING), expecting ')' in bad.php on line 3
Errors parsing bad.php


We can see that files which pass linting output a line containing No syntax errors and those which fail linting output a line containing Errors parsing.



I see that I have 12147 PHP files recursively in the current directory, however the PHP linter is only outputting seven lines:



$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l | wc -l
12147

$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 php -l | wc -l
7


As there were only 7 files parsed by PHP, I can use my head with ls to find some files which have not been parsed:



$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l | head
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1927 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/app.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1076 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/autoload.php
-rw-rw-r-- 1 dotan dotan 25620 Mar 12 12:29 ./bootstrap/cache/services.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 2493 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/paths.php
-rwxrwxr-x 1 dotan dotan 20008 Mar 12 12:30 ./config/app.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 3304 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/auth.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1819 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cache.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 3751 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cartalyst.sentinel-addons.social.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 6849 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cartalyst.sentinel.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1020 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/compile.php
xargs: ls: terminated by signal 13

$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 php -l
No syntax errors detected in ./bootstrap/paths.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/watson/validating/src/ValidatingTrait.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/giggsey/libphonenumber-for-php/src/libphonenumber/data/PhoneNumberMetadata_SI.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/php-vcr/php-vcr/src/VCR/Event/BeforePlaybackEvent.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Support/Facades/Blade.php
No syntax errors detected in ./resources/views/emails/appointment/updated/body.blade.php
No syntax errors detected in ./app/WL/Modules/Location/Commands/RemoveClientLocationCommand.php


Yet, when I try to parse one of those files I see that it does produce the expected output (either passing or failing parsing):



$ php -l ./bootstrap/cache/services.php
No syntax errors detected in ./bootstrap/cache/services.php


I've checked that neither passing nor failing linting is printing the expected lines to stderr:



$ php -l good.php | grep rr
No syntax errors detected in good.php

$ php -l bad.php | grep rr
PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ''foo'' (T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING), expecting ')' in bad.php on line 3
Errors parsing bad.php


What should I check now? My end goal is to lint all the files, then grep for Error parsing to fix those issues.










share|improve this question

















  • 1





    Can the php -l command take multiple arguments with the syntax php -l file1 file2 file3? xargs would be passing the results of find in batches.

    – Haxiel
    1 hour ago











  • @Haxiel: Thank you, in fact xargs was batching. Learn something every day!

    – dotancohen
    58 mins ago















1















I am trying to parse a recursive directory of PHP files using the built in PHP linter, which works like this:



$ php -l good.php
No syntax errors detected in good.php

$ php -l bad.php
PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ''foo'' (T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING), expecting ')' in bad.php on line 3
Errors parsing bad.php


We can see that files which pass linting output a line containing No syntax errors and those which fail linting output a line containing Errors parsing.



I see that I have 12147 PHP files recursively in the current directory, however the PHP linter is only outputting seven lines:



$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l | wc -l
12147

$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 php -l | wc -l
7


As there were only 7 files parsed by PHP, I can use my head with ls to find some files which have not been parsed:



$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l | head
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1927 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/app.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1076 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/autoload.php
-rw-rw-r-- 1 dotan dotan 25620 Mar 12 12:29 ./bootstrap/cache/services.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 2493 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/paths.php
-rwxrwxr-x 1 dotan dotan 20008 Mar 12 12:30 ./config/app.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 3304 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/auth.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1819 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cache.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 3751 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cartalyst.sentinel-addons.social.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 6849 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cartalyst.sentinel.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1020 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/compile.php
xargs: ls: terminated by signal 13

$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 php -l
No syntax errors detected in ./bootstrap/paths.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/watson/validating/src/ValidatingTrait.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/giggsey/libphonenumber-for-php/src/libphonenumber/data/PhoneNumberMetadata_SI.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/php-vcr/php-vcr/src/VCR/Event/BeforePlaybackEvent.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Support/Facades/Blade.php
No syntax errors detected in ./resources/views/emails/appointment/updated/body.blade.php
No syntax errors detected in ./app/WL/Modules/Location/Commands/RemoveClientLocationCommand.php


Yet, when I try to parse one of those files I see that it does produce the expected output (either passing or failing parsing):



$ php -l ./bootstrap/cache/services.php
No syntax errors detected in ./bootstrap/cache/services.php


I've checked that neither passing nor failing linting is printing the expected lines to stderr:



$ php -l good.php | grep rr
No syntax errors detected in good.php

$ php -l bad.php | grep rr
PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ''foo'' (T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING), expecting ')' in bad.php on line 3
Errors parsing bad.php


What should I check now? My end goal is to lint all the files, then grep for Error parsing to fix those issues.










share|improve this question

















  • 1





    Can the php -l command take multiple arguments with the syntax php -l file1 file2 file3? xargs would be passing the results of find in batches.

    – Haxiel
    1 hour ago











  • @Haxiel: Thank you, in fact xargs was batching. Learn something every day!

    – dotancohen
    58 mins ago













1












1








1








I am trying to parse a recursive directory of PHP files using the built in PHP linter, which works like this:



$ php -l good.php
No syntax errors detected in good.php

$ php -l bad.php
PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ''foo'' (T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING), expecting ')' in bad.php on line 3
Errors parsing bad.php


We can see that files which pass linting output a line containing No syntax errors and those which fail linting output a line containing Errors parsing.



I see that I have 12147 PHP files recursively in the current directory, however the PHP linter is only outputting seven lines:



$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l | wc -l
12147

$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 php -l | wc -l
7


As there were only 7 files parsed by PHP, I can use my head with ls to find some files which have not been parsed:



$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l | head
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1927 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/app.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1076 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/autoload.php
-rw-rw-r-- 1 dotan dotan 25620 Mar 12 12:29 ./bootstrap/cache/services.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 2493 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/paths.php
-rwxrwxr-x 1 dotan dotan 20008 Mar 12 12:30 ./config/app.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 3304 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/auth.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1819 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cache.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 3751 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cartalyst.sentinel-addons.social.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 6849 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cartalyst.sentinel.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1020 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/compile.php
xargs: ls: terminated by signal 13

$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 php -l
No syntax errors detected in ./bootstrap/paths.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/watson/validating/src/ValidatingTrait.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/giggsey/libphonenumber-for-php/src/libphonenumber/data/PhoneNumberMetadata_SI.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/php-vcr/php-vcr/src/VCR/Event/BeforePlaybackEvent.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Support/Facades/Blade.php
No syntax errors detected in ./resources/views/emails/appointment/updated/body.blade.php
No syntax errors detected in ./app/WL/Modules/Location/Commands/RemoveClientLocationCommand.php


Yet, when I try to parse one of those files I see that it does produce the expected output (either passing or failing parsing):



$ php -l ./bootstrap/cache/services.php
No syntax errors detected in ./bootstrap/cache/services.php


I've checked that neither passing nor failing linting is printing the expected lines to stderr:



$ php -l good.php | grep rr
No syntax errors detected in good.php

$ php -l bad.php | grep rr
PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ''foo'' (T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING), expecting ')' in bad.php on line 3
Errors parsing bad.php


What should I check now? My end goal is to lint all the files, then grep for Error parsing to fix those issues.










share|improve this question














I am trying to parse a recursive directory of PHP files using the built in PHP linter, which works like this:



$ php -l good.php
No syntax errors detected in good.php

$ php -l bad.php
PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ''foo'' (T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING), expecting ')' in bad.php on line 3
Errors parsing bad.php


We can see that files which pass linting output a line containing No syntax errors and those which fail linting output a line containing Errors parsing.



I see that I have 12147 PHP files recursively in the current directory, however the PHP linter is only outputting seven lines:



$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l | wc -l
12147

$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 php -l | wc -l
7


As there were only 7 files parsed by PHP, I can use my head with ls to find some files which have not been parsed:



$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l | head
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1927 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/app.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1076 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/autoload.php
-rw-rw-r-- 1 dotan dotan 25620 Mar 12 12:29 ./bootstrap/cache/services.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 2493 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/paths.php
-rwxrwxr-x 1 dotan dotan 20008 Mar 12 12:30 ./config/app.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 3304 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/auth.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1819 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cache.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 3751 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cartalyst.sentinel-addons.social.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 6849 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cartalyst.sentinel.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1020 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/compile.php
xargs: ls: terminated by signal 13

$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 php -l
No syntax errors detected in ./bootstrap/paths.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/watson/validating/src/ValidatingTrait.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/giggsey/libphonenumber-for-php/src/libphonenumber/data/PhoneNumberMetadata_SI.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/php-vcr/php-vcr/src/VCR/Event/BeforePlaybackEvent.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Support/Facades/Blade.php
No syntax errors detected in ./resources/views/emails/appointment/updated/body.blade.php
No syntax errors detected in ./app/WL/Modules/Location/Commands/RemoveClientLocationCommand.php


Yet, when I try to parse one of those files I see that it does produce the expected output (either passing or failing parsing):



$ php -l ./bootstrap/cache/services.php
No syntax errors detected in ./bootstrap/cache/services.php


I've checked that neither passing nor failing linting is printing the expected lines to stderr:



$ php -l good.php | grep rr
No syntax errors detected in good.php

$ php -l bad.php | grep rr
PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ''foo'' (T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING), expecting ')' in bad.php on line 3
Errors parsing bad.php


What should I check now? My end goal is to lint all the files, then grep for Error parsing to fix those issues.







bash shell php xargs debugging






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









dotancohendotancohen

6,418195996




6,418195996







  • 1





    Can the php -l command take multiple arguments with the syntax php -l file1 file2 file3? xargs would be passing the results of find in batches.

    – Haxiel
    1 hour ago











  • @Haxiel: Thank you, in fact xargs was batching. Learn something every day!

    – dotancohen
    58 mins ago












  • 1





    Can the php -l command take multiple arguments with the syntax php -l file1 file2 file3? xargs would be passing the results of find in batches.

    – Haxiel
    1 hour ago











  • @Haxiel: Thank you, in fact xargs was batching. Learn something every day!

    – dotancohen
    58 mins ago







1




1





Can the php -l command take multiple arguments with the syntax php -l file1 file2 file3? xargs would be passing the results of find in batches.

– Haxiel
1 hour ago





Can the php -l command take multiple arguments with the syntax php -l file1 file2 file3? xargs would be passing the results of find in batches.

– Haxiel
1 hour ago













@Haxiel: Thank you, in fact xargs was batching. Learn something every day!

– dotancohen
58 mins ago





@Haxiel: Thank you, in fact xargs was batching. Learn something every day!

– dotancohen
58 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














To see whether xargs makes a difference, run the command lines that it runs. Here are a couple of ways to see exactly what it runs, while not risking changing what it runs:



  • Write a script called php in a temporary directory and put it at the beginning of $PATH. In this script, log the arguments (and optionally run the real php afterwards).

  • Run the whole command line under a logging mechanism such as strace.

You will find that the command is something like



php -l ./bootstrap/app.php ./bootstrap/autoload.php ./bootstrap/cache/services.php …


The next step is to investigate what this command does.



I'm not familiar with php but I guess it only treats the first file name as a PHP script name, and that in lint mode it simply ignores all subsequent arguments. So you need to run php -l once for each script, 12147 times in total, instead of using xargs's grouping behavior.



The easiest way to do that is



find . -name *.php -exec php -l ;


but this command will always return 0 even if some invocations of php return a nonzero status. While find mostly doesn't need xargs in the 21st century, a benefit of xargs is that it returns a nonzero status if any invocation of the command returns a nonzero status. So run xargs, but tell it to only process one file at a time with the -n option.



find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 -n 1 php -l





share|improve this answer























  • As usual, you've hit the nail right on the head. xargs was batching the arguments, and the -n 1 flag was the right solution. In fact I was using -exec to continue working while this question was being resolved, but I prefer xargs as I feel it is a more flexible solution. Thank you.

    – dotancohen
    1 hour ago










Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f505880%2fwho-is-eating-data-xargs%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














To see whether xargs makes a difference, run the command lines that it runs. Here are a couple of ways to see exactly what it runs, while not risking changing what it runs:



  • Write a script called php in a temporary directory and put it at the beginning of $PATH. In this script, log the arguments (and optionally run the real php afterwards).

  • Run the whole command line under a logging mechanism such as strace.

You will find that the command is something like



php -l ./bootstrap/app.php ./bootstrap/autoload.php ./bootstrap/cache/services.php …


The next step is to investigate what this command does.



I'm not familiar with php but I guess it only treats the first file name as a PHP script name, and that in lint mode it simply ignores all subsequent arguments. So you need to run php -l once for each script, 12147 times in total, instead of using xargs's grouping behavior.



The easiest way to do that is



find . -name *.php -exec php -l ;


but this command will always return 0 even if some invocations of php return a nonzero status. While find mostly doesn't need xargs in the 21st century, a benefit of xargs is that it returns a nonzero status if any invocation of the command returns a nonzero status. So run xargs, but tell it to only process one file at a time with the -n option.



find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 -n 1 php -l





share|improve this answer























  • As usual, you've hit the nail right on the head. xargs was batching the arguments, and the -n 1 flag was the right solution. In fact I was using -exec to continue working while this question was being resolved, but I prefer xargs as I feel it is a more flexible solution. Thank you.

    – dotancohen
    1 hour ago















3














To see whether xargs makes a difference, run the command lines that it runs. Here are a couple of ways to see exactly what it runs, while not risking changing what it runs:



  • Write a script called php in a temporary directory and put it at the beginning of $PATH. In this script, log the arguments (and optionally run the real php afterwards).

  • Run the whole command line under a logging mechanism such as strace.

You will find that the command is something like



php -l ./bootstrap/app.php ./bootstrap/autoload.php ./bootstrap/cache/services.php …


The next step is to investigate what this command does.



I'm not familiar with php but I guess it only treats the first file name as a PHP script name, and that in lint mode it simply ignores all subsequent arguments. So you need to run php -l once for each script, 12147 times in total, instead of using xargs's grouping behavior.



The easiest way to do that is



find . -name *.php -exec php -l ;


but this command will always return 0 even if some invocations of php return a nonzero status. While find mostly doesn't need xargs in the 21st century, a benefit of xargs is that it returns a nonzero status if any invocation of the command returns a nonzero status. So run xargs, but tell it to only process one file at a time with the -n option.



find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 -n 1 php -l





share|improve this answer























  • As usual, you've hit the nail right on the head. xargs was batching the arguments, and the -n 1 flag was the right solution. In fact I was using -exec to continue working while this question was being resolved, but I prefer xargs as I feel it is a more flexible solution. Thank you.

    – dotancohen
    1 hour ago













3












3








3







To see whether xargs makes a difference, run the command lines that it runs. Here are a couple of ways to see exactly what it runs, while not risking changing what it runs:



  • Write a script called php in a temporary directory and put it at the beginning of $PATH. In this script, log the arguments (and optionally run the real php afterwards).

  • Run the whole command line under a logging mechanism such as strace.

You will find that the command is something like



php -l ./bootstrap/app.php ./bootstrap/autoload.php ./bootstrap/cache/services.php …


The next step is to investigate what this command does.



I'm not familiar with php but I guess it only treats the first file name as a PHP script name, and that in lint mode it simply ignores all subsequent arguments. So you need to run php -l once for each script, 12147 times in total, instead of using xargs's grouping behavior.



The easiest way to do that is



find . -name *.php -exec php -l ;


but this command will always return 0 even if some invocations of php return a nonzero status. While find mostly doesn't need xargs in the 21st century, a benefit of xargs is that it returns a nonzero status if any invocation of the command returns a nonzero status. So run xargs, but tell it to only process one file at a time with the -n option.



find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 -n 1 php -l





share|improve this answer













To see whether xargs makes a difference, run the command lines that it runs. Here are a couple of ways to see exactly what it runs, while not risking changing what it runs:



  • Write a script called php in a temporary directory and put it at the beginning of $PATH. In this script, log the arguments (and optionally run the real php afterwards).

  • Run the whole command line under a logging mechanism such as strace.

You will find that the command is something like



php -l ./bootstrap/app.php ./bootstrap/autoload.php ./bootstrap/cache/services.php …


The next step is to investigate what this command does.



I'm not familiar with php but I guess it only treats the first file name as a PHP script name, and that in lint mode it simply ignores all subsequent arguments. So you need to run php -l once for each script, 12147 times in total, instead of using xargs's grouping behavior.



The easiest way to do that is



find . -name *.php -exec php -l ;


but this command will always return 0 even if some invocations of php return a nonzero status. While find mostly doesn't need xargs in the 21st century, a benefit of xargs is that it returns a nonzero status if any invocation of the command returns a nonzero status. So run xargs, but tell it to only process one file at a time with the -n option.



find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 -n 1 php -l






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 1 hour ago









GillesGilles

542k12810951613




542k12810951613












  • As usual, you've hit the nail right on the head. xargs was batching the arguments, and the -n 1 flag was the right solution. In fact I was using -exec to continue working while this question was being resolved, but I prefer xargs as I feel it is a more flexible solution. Thank you.

    – dotancohen
    1 hour ago

















  • As usual, you've hit the nail right on the head. xargs was batching the arguments, and the -n 1 flag was the right solution. In fact I was using -exec to continue working while this question was being resolved, but I prefer xargs as I feel it is a more flexible solution. Thank you.

    – dotancohen
    1 hour ago
















As usual, you've hit the nail right on the head. xargs was batching the arguments, and the -n 1 flag was the right solution. In fact I was using -exec to continue working while this question was being resolved, but I prefer xargs as I feel it is a more flexible solution. Thank you.

– dotancohen
1 hour ago





As usual, you've hit the nail right on the head. xargs was batching the arguments, and the -n 1 flag was the right solution. In fact I was using -exec to continue working while this question was being resolved, but I prefer xargs as I feel it is a more flexible solution. Thank you.

– dotancohen
1 hour ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f505880%2fwho-is-eating-data-xargs%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-bash, debugging, php, shell, xargs

Popular posts from this blog

Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god existsWord for having a definite opinion while simultaneously withholding judgment?What's the opposite of “newcomer? Is ”veteran" OK?What do you call an “atheist” who might believe in an afterlife?What's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Word for someone who dismisses contrary opinions as irrational?Somone who thinks they are overly special/out of the ordinaryIs there a word, phrase or idiom for “a person who is incapable of thinking about the future”?The belief that a god is human-likeA word for a non-famous person/thing you have heard a lot aboutAdjective for a person who enjoys taking care of their appearance

What was this official D&D 3.5e Lovecraft-flavored rulebook?What was this set of RPG tools called?As a first-time DM should I let my players play complex character classes and roles?Nymph's Kiss and the RelationshipWhat was the name of this Cleric Prestige Class that shapes metal with its bare hands?Are the 3.5e Dragonlance books third party or official works?What's up with the domain Vile Darkness?What was this 80s book about RPGs?What was the name of this Werewolf band?What book had Rituals to “upgrade” animal companions to keep them viable at higher levels?What was this RPG that had rules for player-owned businesses?

2017 IndyCar Series Contents Series news Teams and drivers Schedule Season summary Footnotes References External links Navigation menu"INDYCAR: Initial 2018 bodywork concepts unveiled"the original"IndyCar confirms switch to Performance Friction brakes in 2017""AJ Foyt Racing will switch to Chevy"the original"Carlos Munoz, Conor Daly will drive for AJ Foyt Racing""Zach Veach's Indy 500 Debut Confirmed with Foyt""No mass exodus from Honda after Ganassi switch""Ex-F1 driver Sato joins Andretti Autosport for 2017 IndyCar season""IndyCar's Ryan Hunter-Reay, sponsor DHL paired through 2020""hhgregg and Andretti Autosport announce partnership for key races in 2016""INDYCAR: Rossi re-signs with Andretti"the original"McLaren Formula 1 - Fernando Alonso to race at Indy 500 with McLaren, Honda and Andretti Autosport""Shank will finally take part in Indy 500 with Harvey, Andretti | MotorSportsTalk""Andretti adds Jack Harvey to Indy 500 field""Ganassi switches to Honda power for 2017""INDYCAR: Chilton returns to Ganassi"the original"IndyCar silly season: Who's going where in 2017?""INDYCAR: Kanaan, NTT Data return to Ganassi"the original"Kimball to remain at Ganassi for 2017""Coyne confirms Bourdais for 2017 IndyCar season""Davison to sub for Bourdais in Indy 500"the original"Gutierrez confirmed for Detroit IndyCar debut""Gutierrez returns with Coyne for rest of 2017 season""Vautier to drive for Coyne at Texas"the original"INDYCAR: Coyne confirms Jones for 2017"the original"Pippa Mann returns to Coyne for Indy 500""Karam, Dreyer & Reinbold teaming up again for Indianapolis 500""Pigot to return to Ed Carpenter Racing""Hildebrand confirmed as full-time Ed Carpenter driver""Veach to replace injured Hildebrand at Barber"the originalNew Team Harding Racing Enters Chaves for 101st Indianapolis 500"Juncos Racing Announces Entry in 101st Running of the Indianapolis 500 :: Juncos Racing""Juncos confirms Pigot for Indy 500""Saavedra confirmed in Juncos' second 500 entry"the original"Lazier confirms Indy 500 run after son's USF2000 debut"the original"Claman DeMelo to race for RLLR at Sonoma"the original"Rahal signs Servia and ace engineer for 2017""IndyCar: Aleshin returns with Schmidt"the original"Aleshin replaced by Saavedra for Toronto""Jack Harvey will pilot SPM No. 7 car at Watkins Glen, Sonoma""Jay Howard confirmed in Tony Stewart's supported SPM Indy entry""INDYCAR: Newgarden to wave the flag at Penske"the original"Pagenaud opts for No. 1 in 2017"the original"Penske confirms Newgarden for 2017""Montoya to stay with Team Penske in 2017""Target leaving IndyCar after 27 seasons with Chip Ganassi""Cavin: IndyCar could see complete driver/team shakeup in 2017""End of the road for KV Racing?""KV Racing confirms closure, equipment sold to Juncos""Juncos confirms IndyCar Series entry"the original"Juncos readies IndyCar program, aims for '17 500"the original"Harding Racing to add Texas, Pocono to schedule"the original"Sato signs with Andretti Autosport for 2017""INDYCAR: Aleshin in Doubt at SPM"the original"Long Beach notebook: JR Hildebrand breaks hand""Hildebrand cleared to return at Phoenix"the original"Bourdais to undergo surgery on multiple fractures""Aleshin loses Schmidt Peterson IndyCar ride""Saavedra in at SPM for Pocono, Gateway"the original"Bourdais to make return at Gateway"the original"The IndyCar Grand Prix no longer is sponsored by Angie's List""2017 IndyCar Series rulebook""2017 Verizon IndyCar Series Official Rulebook"Official websiteeeeee