Filter out items that belong to the Source Packages2019 Community Moderator ElectionWhich version of X introduced feature Y?Prevent clashing of development version with system packagesReplacing Multiple Debian Packages from Compiled SourceFiguring out installed packages on Ubuntu from filesystem backupI just want to install a package!Pruning the package tree with apt-get and yumHow to get ALL kinds of reverse package dependencies: reverse-depends pendant for non-Ubuntu distributionsBuild CentOS RPM for current git release, unsuccessful rebuild with alternate prefixHow does the update process work for different install methods?apt-get: Almost all packages “have no installation candidate”
Do I really need to have a scientific explanation for my premise?
infinitive telling the purpose
What are some noteworthy "mic-drop" moments in math?
Replacing Windows 7 security updates with 3rd party alternatives?
Can Mathematica be used to create an Artistic 3D extrusion from a 2D image and wrap a line pattern around it?
Signed and unsigned numbers
How do I deal with a powergamer in a game full of beginners in a school club?
Virginia employer terminated employee and wants signing bonus returned
PTIJ: wiping amalek’s memory?
Is there an equal sign with wider gap?
Why does Deadpool say "You're welcome, Canada," after shooting Ryan Reynolds in the end credits?
What are actual Tesla M60 models used by AWS?
GPLv2 - licensing for commercial use
Aliens englobed the Solar System: will we notice?
Why would one plane in this picture not have gear down yet?
Why does the negative sign arise in this thermodynamic relation?
Can one live in the U.S. and not use a credit card?
Is Gradient Descent central to every optimizer?
Good allowance savings plan?
What does C-53 signify?
How can I ensure my trip to the UK will not have to be cancelled because of Brexit?
Meaning of ちはース as an exclamation
Grey hair or white hair
How did the power source of Mar-Vell's aircraft end up with her?
Filter out items that belong to the Source Packages
2019 Community Moderator ElectionWhich version of X introduced feature Y?Prevent clashing of development version with system packagesReplacing Multiple Debian Packages from Compiled SourceFiguring out installed packages on Ubuntu from filesystem backupI just want to install a package!Pruning the package tree with apt-get and yumHow to get ALL kinds of reverse package dependencies: reverse-depends pendant for non-Ubuntu distributionsBuild CentOS RPM for current git release, unsuccessful rebuild with alternate prefixHow does the update process work for different install methods?apt-get: Almost all packages “have no installation candidate”
0
Here I have a Manifest of Ubuntu
I would like to list out only the Source Packages and not the containing items.
binutils 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
binutils-common:amd64 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
The result I would like to see:
binutils 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
Additionally, short information about each source package would be as well a nice thing.
binutils 2.31.1-6ubuntu1 The GNU Binutils are a collection of binary tools.
What are the most simple ways to achieve this using Bash, GNU Coreutils anything else?
ubuntu package-management coreutils
asked 3 hours ago
user3789797user3789797
12
New contributor
user3789797 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
0
Here I have a Manifest of Ubuntu
I would like to list out only the Source Packages and not the containing items.
binutils 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
binutils-common:amd64 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
The result I would like to see:
binutils 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
Additionally, short information about each source package would be as well a nice thing.
binutils 2.31.1-6ubuntu1 The GNU Binutils are a collection of binary tools.
What are the most simple ways to achieve this using Bash, GNU Coreutils anything else?
ubuntu package-management coreutils
asked 3 hours ago
user3789797user3789797
12
New contributor
user3789797 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
3
I don't have an Ubuntu system at-hand, but aren't those individual, separate (if related) packages?
– Jeff Schaller
3 hours ago
2
These are not containing items. These are packages. Actually in Ubuntu, a package depends on multiple other packages. So, they are separate package on which binutils depends. These packages are separated since they may satisfy dependency of some other packages too.
– Kulfy
3 hours ago
Hmm, it could be that I'm wrong, look at the manifest I linked. But they all belong to the same binutils, as they start with binutils-*. I kind of need help to rephrase my question. If they are seperate packages, but related to one another, then how should I call them?
– user3789797
3 hours ago
The term you’re looking for is probably “source package”. The three listedbinutilspackages all come from thebinutilssource package.
– Stephen Kitt
2 hours ago
That is probably it, official definition of the Source Package: wiki.debian.org/Packaging/SourcePackage
– user3789797
1 hour ago
add a comment |
0
0
0
Here I have a Manifest of Ubuntu
I would like to list out only the Source Packages and not the containing items.
binutils 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
binutils-common:amd64 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
The result I would like to see:
binutils 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
Additionally, short information about each source package would be as well a nice thing.
binutils 2.31.1-6ubuntu1 The GNU Binutils are a collection of binary tools.
What are the most simple ways to achieve this using Bash, GNU Coreutils anything else?
ubuntu package-management coreutils
asked 3 hours ago
user3789797user3789797
12
New contributor
user3789797 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Here I have a Manifest of Ubuntu
I would like to list out only the Source Packages and not the containing items.
binutils 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
binutils-common:amd64 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
The result I would like to see:
binutils 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
Additionally, short information about each source package would be as well a nice thing.
binutils 2.31.1-6ubuntu1 The GNU Binutils are a collection of binary tools.
What are the most simple ways to achieve this using Bash, GNU Coreutils anything else?
ubuntu package-management coreutils
ubuntu package-management coreutils
asked 3 hours ago
user3789797user3789797
12
New contributor
user3789797 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 hours ago
user3789797user3789797
12
New contributor
user3789797 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 1 hour ago
user3789797
asked 3 hours ago
user3789797user3789797
12
New contributor
user3789797 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 hours ago
user3789797user3789797
12
asked 3 hours ago
user3789797user3789797
12
12
New contributor
user3789797 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
user3789797 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
user3789797 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
3
I don't have an Ubuntu system at-hand, but aren't those individual, separate (if related) packages?
– Jeff Schaller
3 hours ago
2
These are not containing items. These are packages. Actually in Ubuntu, a package depends on multiple other packages. So, they are separate package on which binutils depends. These packages are separated since they may satisfy dependency of some other packages too.
– Kulfy
3 hours ago
Hmm, it could be that I'm wrong, look at the manifest I linked. But they all belong to the same binutils, as they start with binutils-*. I kind of need help to rephrase my question. If they are seperate packages, but related to one another, then how should I call them?
– user3789797
3 hours ago
The term you’re looking for is probably “source package”. The three listedbinutilspackages all come from thebinutilssource package.
– Stephen Kitt
2 hours ago
That is probably it, official definition of the Source Package: wiki.debian.org/Packaging/SourcePackage
– user3789797
1 hour ago
add a comment |
3
I don't have an Ubuntu system at-hand, but aren't those individual, separate (if related) packages?
– Jeff Schaller
3 hours ago
2
These are not containing items. These are packages. Actually in Ubuntu, a package depends on multiple other packages. So, they are separate package on which binutils depends. These packages are separated since they may satisfy dependency of some other packages too.
– Kulfy
3 hours ago
Hmm, it could be that I'm wrong, look at the manifest I linked. But they all belong to the same binutils, as they start with binutils-*. I kind of need help to rephrase my question. If they are seperate packages, but related to one another, then how should I call them?
– user3789797
3 hours ago
The term you’re looking for is probably “source package”. The three listedbinutilspackages all come from thebinutilssource package.
– Stephen Kitt
2 hours ago
That is probably it, official definition of the Source Package: wiki.debian.org/Packaging/SourcePackage
– user3789797
1 hour ago
3
3
I don't have an Ubuntu system at-hand, but aren't those individual, separate (if related) packages?
– Jeff Schaller
3 hours ago
I don't have an Ubuntu system at-hand, but aren't those individual, separate (if related) packages?
– Jeff Schaller
3 hours ago
2
2
These are not containing items. These are packages. Actually in Ubuntu, a package depends on multiple other packages. So, they are separate package on which binutils depends. These packages are separated since they may satisfy dependency of some other packages too.
– Kulfy
3 hours ago
These are not containing items. These are packages. Actually in Ubuntu, a package depends on multiple other packages. So, they are separate package on which binutils depends. These packages are separated since they may satisfy dependency of some other packages too.
– Kulfy
3 hours ago
Hmm, it could be that I'm wrong, look at the manifest I linked. But they all belong to the same binutils, as they start with binutils-*. I kind of need help to rephrase my question. If they are seperate packages, but related to one another, then how should I call them?
– user3789797
3 hours ago
Hmm, it could be that I'm wrong, look at the manifest I linked. But they all belong to the same binutils, as they start with binutils-*. I kind of need help to rephrase my question. If they are seperate packages, but related to one another, then how should I call them?
– user3789797
3 hours ago
The term you’re looking for is probably “source package”. The three listed
binutils packages all come from the binutils source package.– Stephen Kitt
2 hours ago
The term you’re looking for is probably “source package”. The three listed
binutils packages all come from the binutils source package.– Stephen Kitt
2 hours ago
That is probably it, official definition of the Source Package: wiki.debian.org/Packaging/SourcePackage
– user3789797
1 hour ago
That is probably it, official definition of the Source Package: wiki.debian.org/Packaging/SourcePackage
– user3789797
1 hour ago
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
user3789797 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f505850%2ffilter-out-items-that-belong-to-the-source-packages%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
user3789797 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
draft saved
draft discarded
user3789797 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user3789797 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user3789797 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f505850%2ffilter-out-items-that-belong-to-the-source-packages%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
-coreutils, package-management, ubuntu
3
I don't have an Ubuntu system at-hand, but aren't those individual, separate (if related) packages?
– Jeff Schaller
3 hours ago
2
These are not containing items. These are packages. Actually in Ubuntu, a package depends on multiple other packages. So, they are separate package on which binutils depends. These packages are separated since they may satisfy dependency of some other packages too.
– Kulfy
3 hours ago
Hmm, it could be that I'm wrong, look at the manifest I linked. But they all belong to the same binutils, as they start with binutils-*. I kind of need help to rephrase my question. If they are seperate packages, but related to one another, then how should I call them?
– user3789797
3 hours ago
The term you’re looking for is probably “source package”. The three listed
binutilspackages all come from thebinutilssource package.– Stephen Kitt
2 hours ago
That is probably it, official definition of the Source Package: wiki.debian.org/Packaging/SourcePackage
– user3789797
1 hour ago