Do any of the books contain (magic) items for animal companions?Are mounts proficient in armour (barding)?Can a Beast Master ranger armor their animal companion with barding?Can an animal attune to a magic item?How do you grant a ranger his animal companion within the story?Starting a higher-level Animal Companion as a younger versionDoes Unnatural Ally change the Ranger's existing animal companion or grant a monstrous replacement?Does the Beast Conclave ranger's animal companion get a boost when you get it at 3rd level?Benefits for Animal CompanionCan I change my animal companion?Does Your Animal Companion Only Get 2 Skill Proficiencies or Does It Get More?Can my wolf attack when I’m riding her?How long would it take for me to train my animal companion to use a shortsword?How to calculate a revised ranger's animal companion's skill bonuses?

Is "history" a male-biased word ("his+story")?

Are there historical instances of the capital of a colonising country being temporarily or permanently shifted to one of its colonies?

What to do when during a meeting client people start to fight (even physically) with each others?

Are babies of evil humanoid species inherently evil?

Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god exists

PTIJ: How can I halachically kill a vampire?

Why was Goose renamed from Chewie for the Captain Marvel film?

Should QA ask requirements to developers?

Detecting subscript in command argument

Low budget alien movie about the Earth being cooked

Force user to remove USB token

Should I tell my boss the work he did was worthless

Do f-stop and exposure time perfectly cancel?

Is there an elementary proof that there are infinitely many primes that are *not* completely split in an abelian extension?

How can The Temple of Elementary Evil reliably protect itself against kinetic bombardment?

How do I deal with a powergamer in a game full of beginners in a school club?

Set and print content of environment variable in cmd.exe subshell?

Could you please stop shuffling the deck and play already?

Unreachable code, but reachable with exception

How much attack damage does the AC boost from a shield prevent on average?

Can a bounded number sequence be strictly ascending?

Compression function is not collision resistant but Merkle-Damgard is collision resistant

UART pins to unpowered MCU?

PTIJ: where are Tzafra and Urta located?



Do any of the books contain (magic) items for animal companions?


Are mounts proficient in armour (barding)?Can a Beast Master ranger armor their animal companion with barding?Can an animal attune to a magic item?How do you grant a ranger his animal companion within the story?Starting a higher-level Animal Companion as a younger versionDoes Unnatural Ally change the Ranger's existing animal companion or grant a monstrous replacement?Does the Beast Conclave ranger's animal companion get a boost when you get it at 3rd level?Benefits for Animal CompanionCan I change my animal companion?Does Your Animal Companion Only Get 2 Skill Proficiencies or Does It Get More?Can my wolf attack when I’m riding her?How long would it take for me to train my animal companion to use a shortsword?How to calculate a revised ranger's animal companion's skill bonuses?













4












$begingroup$


Context



An 11th level PC in a game that I DM is a ranger6/rogue3/warlock2. He noticed that his animal companion, a black panther, could use a little boost to her defenses, as she goes down frequently. This is due to the PC's multiclassing and his (preferred) reckless approach to combat (face first).



Note: the animal companion currently has 38 HP with an AC of 14. The ranger (Beast Conclave) is from Unearthed Arcana: The Ranger, revised.



His character, therefore, inquired about armor options for his panther. The particular, visited blacksmith replied that "for the right prize, anything is possible, but [he'll] need some time to craft this".



Now, post-session, I'm looking into existing options from the books, but I can't find any. I own all the books, except for XGTE and the adventure modules.



Question



Do any of the books contain (magic) items for animal companions?



I'm mostly interested in armor, but going through the pages I'm wondering if any such item exists. I also allow sources from Unearthed Arcana, so within the scope of this question I count UA as "any of the books".



If not, I'll homebrew the armor for the PC and might possibly follow up on this question.



Research / Confusion



As Sdjz points out in a comment, there's a question that hints to a "yes" on my question: Can a Beast Master ranger armor their animal companion with barding?




Barding. Barding is armor designed to protect an animal’s head, neck, chest, and body. Any type of armor shown on the Armor table in this chapter can be purchased as barding. The cost is four times the equivalent armor made for humanoids, and it weighs twice as much.




I'm attempting to read up on barding with the PHB in front of me. The index says "under Armor and Shield" so I went to page 144-145. But I don't see any mention of barding, under this section. Am I missing something here?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Related: Can a Beast Master ranger armor their animal companion with barding?
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Also related and possible duplicate: Can an animal attune to a magic item?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I edited your question to fix a few minor mistakes and improve the style in a few places. If you disagree with my changes, feel free to edit them out, or even roll back the entire edit.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The below question is very important if you intend to use magical barding for a Ranger's Companion. The beast will lack proficiency unless the GM allows it resulting in disadvantage on Strength- and Dexterity-based attack rolls, saving throws, and ability checks. Are mounts proficient in armour (barding)?
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    2 hours ago















4












$begingroup$


Context



An 11th level PC in a game that I DM is a ranger6/rogue3/warlock2. He noticed that his animal companion, a black panther, could use a little boost to her defenses, as she goes down frequently. This is due to the PC's multiclassing and his (preferred) reckless approach to combat (face first).



Note: the animal companion currently has 38 HP with an AC of 14. The ranger (Beast Conclave) is from Unearthed Arcana: The Ranger, revised.



His character, therefore, inquired about armor options for his panther. The particular, visited blacksmith replied that "for the right prize, anything is possible, but [he'll] need some time to craft this".



Now, post-session, I'm looking into existing options from the books, but I can't find any. I own all the books, except for XGTE and the adventure modules.



Question



Do any of the books contain (magic) items for animal companions?



I'm mostly interested in armor, but going through the pages I'm wondering if any such item exists. I also allow sources from Unearthed Arcana, so within the scope of this question I count UA as "any of the books".



If not, I'll homebrew the armor for the PC and might possibly follow up on this question.



Research / Confusion



As Sdjz points out in a comment, there's a question that hints to a "yes" on my question: Can a Beast Master ranger armor their animal companion with barding?




Barding. Barding is armor designed to protect an animal’s head, neck, chest, and body. Any type of armor shown on the Armor table in this chapter can be purchased as barding. The cost is four times the equivalent armor made for humanoids, and it weighs twice as much.




I'm attempting to read up on barding with the PHB in front of me. The index says "under Armor and Shield" so I went to page 144-145. But I don't see any mention of barding, under this section. Am I missing something here?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Related: Can a Beast Master ranger armor their animal companion with barding?
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Also related and possible duplicate: Can an animal attune to a magic item?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I edited your question to fix a few minor mistakes and improve the style in a few places. If you disagree with my changes, feel free to edit them out, or even roll back the entire edit.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The below question is very important if you intend to use magical barding for a Ranger's Companion. The beast will lack proficiency unless the GM allows it resulting in disadvantage on Strength- and Dexterity-based attack rolls, saving throws, and ability checks. Are mounts proficient in armour (barding)?
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    2 hours ago













4












4








4





$begingroup$


Context



An 11th level PC in a game that I DM is a ranger6/rogue3/warlock2. He noticed that his animal companion, a black panther, could use a little boost to her defenses, as she goes down frequently. This is due to the PC's multiclassing and his (preferred) reckless approach to combat (face first).



Note: the animal companion currently has 38 HP with an AC of 14. The ranger (Beast Conclave) is from Unearthed Arcana: The Ranger, revised.



His character, therefore, inquired about armor options for his panther. The particular, visited blacksmith replied that "for the right prize, anything is possible, but [he'll] need some time to craft this".



Now, post-session, I'm looking into existing options from the books, but I can't find any. I own all the books, except for XGTE and the adventure modules.



Question



Do any of the books contain (magic) items for animal companions?



I'm mostly interested in armor, but going through the pages I'm wondering if any such item exists. I also allow sources from Unearthed Arcana, so within the scope of this question I count UA as "any of the books".



If not, I'll homebrew the armor for the PC and might possibly follow up on this question.



Research / Confusion



As Sdjz points out in a comment, there's a question that hints to a "yes" on my question: Can a Beast Master ranger armor their animal companion with barding?




Barding. Barding is armor designed to protect an animal’s head, neck, chest, and body. Any type of armor shown on the Armor table in this chapter can be purchased as barding. The cost is four times the equivalent armor made for humanoids, and it weighs twice as much.




I'm attempting to read up on barding with the PHB in front of me. The index says "under Armor and Shield" so I went to page 144-145. But I don't see any mention of barding, under this section. Am I missing something here?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Context



An 11th level PC in a game that I DM is a ranger6/rogue3/warlock2. He noticed that his animal companion, a black panther, could use a little boost to her defenses, as she goes down frequently. This is due to the PC's multiclassing and his (preferred) reckless approach to combat (face first).



Note: the animal companion currently has 38 HP with an AC of 14. The ranger (Beast Conclave) is from Unearthed Arcana: The Ranger, revised.



His character, therefore, inquired about armor options for his panther. The particular, visited blacksmith replied that "for the right prize, anything is possible, but [he'll] need some time to craft this".



Now, post-session, I'm looking into existing options from the books, but I can't find any. I own all the books, except for XGTE and the adventure modules.



Question



Do any of the books contain (magic) items for animal companions?



I'm mostly interested in armor, but going through the pages I'm wondering if any such item exists. I also allow sources from Unearthed Arcana, so within the scope of this question I count UA as "any of the books".



If not, I'll homebrew the armor for the PC and might possibly follow up on this question.



Research / Confusion



As Sdjz points out in a comment, there's a question that hints to a "yes" on my question: Can a Beast Master ranger armor their animal companion with barding?




Barding. Barding is armor designed to protect an animal’s head, neck, chest, and body. Any type of armor shown on the Armor table in this chapter can be purchased as barding. The cost is four times the equivalent armor made for humanoids, and it weighs twice as much.




I'm attempting to read up on barding with the PHB in front of me. The index says "under Armor and Shield" so I went to page 144-145. But I don't see any mention of barding, under this section. Am I missing something here?







dnd-5e ranger armor animal-companions






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago







Vadruk

















asked 5 hours ago









VadrukVadruk

2,58711558




2,58711558







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Related: Can a Beast Master ranger armor their animal companion with barding?
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Also related and possible duplicate: Can an animal attune to a magic item?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I edited your question to fix a few minor mistakes and improve the style in a few places. If you disagree with my changes, feel free to edit them out, or even roll back the entire edit.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The below question is very important if you intend to use magical barding for a Ranger's Companion. The beast will lack proficiency unless the GM allows it resulting in disadvantage on Strength- and Dexterity-based attack rolls, saving throws, and ability checks. Are mounts proficient in armour (barding)?
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    2 hours ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Related: Can a Beast Master ranger armor their animal companion with barding?
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Also related and possible duplicate: Can an animal attune to a magic item?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I edited your question to fix a few minor mistakes and improve the style in a few places. If you disagree with my changes, feel free to edit them out, or even roll back the entire edit.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The below question is very important if you intend to use magical barding for a Ranger's Companion. The beast will lack proficiency unless the GM allows it resulting in disadvantage on Strength- and Dexterity-based attack rolls, saving throws, and ability checks. Are mounts proficient in armour (barding)?
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    2 hours ago







2




2




$begingroup$
Related: Can a Beast Master ranger armor their animal companion with barding?
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Related: Can a Beast Master ranger armor their animal companion with barding?
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
Also related and possible duplicate: Can an animal attune to a magic item?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Also related and possible duplicate: Can an animal attune to a magic item?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
4 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
I edited your question to fix a few minor mistakes and improve the style in a few places. If you disagree with my changes, feel free to edit them out, or even roll back the entire edit.
$endgroup$
– PixelMaster
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
I edited your question to fix a few minor mistakes and improve the style in a few places. If you disagree with my changes, feel free to edit them out, or even roll back the entire edit.
$endgroup$
– PixelMaster
4 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
The below question is very important if you intend to use magical barding for a Ranger's Companion. The beast will lack proficiency unless the GM allows it resulting in disadvantage on Strength- and Dexterity-based attack rolls, saving throws, and ability checks. Are mounts proficient in armour (barding)?
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
The below question is very important if you intend to use magical barding for a Ranger's Companion. The beast will lack proficiency unless the GM allows it resulting in disadvantage on Strength- and Dexterity-based attack rolls, saving throws, and ability checks. Are mounts proficient in armour (barding)?
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
2 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















10












$begingroup$

Magical Armor +1/+2/+3



The DMG doesn't specifically list e.g. "Plate Armor +2", but rather the following, generic description (DMG, p. 152):




Armor, +1 , +2 , OR +3



Armor (light, medium, or heavy), rare (+1), very rare (+2), or legendary (+3)



You have a bonus to AC while wearing this armor. The bonus is determined by its rarity.




So, for armor to be possibly available as +1, +2, or +3, it simply has to count as light, medium or heavy armor.



Now, armor is available for animals (called barding), in all varieties available to humanoids, just more expensive (see PHB p. 157). Since barding is therefore also categorized as either light, medium or heavy armor, it is consequentially also available in its magical variants. Therefore, items such as "Studded Leather Barding +2" can exist.



How you calculate the price is up to you: you can use the cost the equivalent magical armor for humanoids (see DMG p. 135 for magic item prices by rarity), plus the price difference between unenchanted humanoid and animal armor.

Alternatively, you can multiply the cost of the magical item by four, i.e. how barding prices are calculated for unenchanted armor. I would suggest the former, though, to avoid excessively high magical barding prices.




Note: mounts are not necessarily proficient in armor/barding, and - like humanoids - will suffer disadvantages if they wear armor that they are not proficient in. Thanks @David Coffron for bringing that up, and see this question for details.




Examples for price calculation (I'll be using the upper limit for magic item prices; again, see DMG p. 135 for magic item prices by rarity, and p. 152 for rarities of magical armor):



Option 1:



$ Studded Leather Barding +1 = Humanoid's Studded Leather +1 + (Studded Leather Barding - Humanoid's Studded Leather) = 5000gp + (4*45gp - 45gp) = 5135gp$



... or (again, only in the case of Studded Leather) 135gp more than whatever you would charge for a suit made for humanoids.

More general: take the price for a suit of magical armor made for humanoids, and add 3 times the value of unenchanted barding of the same armor variety. Magical plate armor for animals would, therefore, be $ 3 * 1500gp = 4500gp $ more expensive than the humanoid equivalent.



Option 2:



$ Studded Leather Barding +1 = Humanoid's Studded Leather +1 * 4 = 5000gp * 4 = 20000gp $



This is easier to calculate, but absurdly expensive. I would advise using option 1.



All other items that are logically wearable by an animal



The DMG states the following on page 141:




When a nonhumanoid tries to wear an item, use your discretion as to whether the item functions as intended. A ring placed on a tentacle might work, but a yuan-ti with a snakelike tail instead of legs can't wear boots.




Therefore, your ranger's panther can't use a magical sword (or nonmagical swords, for that matter), but e.g. an Amulet of Health (CON=19, unless already higher) or a Ring of Protection (AC+1) shouldn't be an issue.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Great and thorough answer! Normally option 1 seems solid, but in my homebrew world – dealing in magic items is a shady/deadly business, and the PC's already have about 3-4 magic items each – I'll go for option 2.
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    3 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It may be worth mentioning that most beasts will lack proficiency in armor and be penalized for wearing barding.
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DavidCoffron thanks for mentioning that! I added a paragraph about proficiency to my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    1 hour ago


















3












$begingroup$

Yes, there is at least one option for armoring an animal companion.



As Can a Beast Master ranger armor their animal companion with barding? points out:




Barding is armor designed to protect an animal’s head, neck, chest, and body. Any type of armor shown on the Armor table in this chapter can be purchased as barding. The cost is four times the equivalent armor made for humanoids, and it weighs twice as much.




Since mounts can use armor through barding, it's safe to say an animal companion could do the same.



Source clarification



Part of your confusion could be caused by an unclarity in the index of the PHB. Although the index mentions to look under Shields and Armor (page 144-145) for barding, you should actually look under Mounts and Vehicles on page 155. And as Rubiksmoose points out in a comment:




When it says "see under x" it means to look under x in the index. In this case looking under "armor and shields" in the index you will see an entry for barding listed for p 155.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fwiw, the index thing is not actually an error, though it is confusing. When it says "see under x" it means to look under x in the index. In this case looking under "armor and shields" in the index you will see an entry for barding listed for p 155.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    You are right, and I'm amazed at how I could overlook that detail... thank you :) Will make a slight adjustment to the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    It may be worth mentioning that most beasts will lack proficiency in armor and be penalized for wearing barding.
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    2 hours ago


















2












$begingroup$

Side-stepping the main question a bit, and going for a deeper issue... Your companion has its stats wrong.



Revised Ranger pets should be very durable.



Companions have tons of AC, even without barding custom armor:




An animal companion also adds its proficiency bonus to its AC.




They have lots of HP, which increases even when multiclassing:




For each level you gain after 3rd, your animal companion gains an additional hit die and increases its hit points accordingly.




Your panther companion should have 53HP (13 at level 3, 5HP/level after that) and 16AC (12 natural armor + proficiency).



If you want it even tankier, a single extra-level in Ranger gives the beast great saves:




At 7th level, while your companion can see you, it has advantage on all saving throws.




Now, if you pick a pet with 0 CON and play recklessly, yeah, the pet won't be very durable. But you can resurrect it with an 8h ritual, or heal it with hit dice on short rests. You can also pick more defensive pets (Black Bear), play them safely, or get them magical items (with DM fiat) to make them stronger. I refer to other answers for such items.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for pointing out the panther should have more HP and AC! The text doesn't mention class level, indeed. A little correction though: according to the UA, a ranger cannot summon the companion through a long rest: “With 8 hours of work and the expenditure of 25 gp worth of rare herbs and fine food, you call forth your companion’s spirit and use your magic to create a new body for it. You can return an animal companion to life in this manner even if you do not possess any part of its body.”
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    additon to @Vadruk's comment: a long rest also happens to be 8 hours long, but you have to spend 6 of those hours asleep, and the rest doing only light work. Therefore, you can't perform this ritual during a long rest.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh, my bad! I'll fix it
    $endgroup$
    – BlueMoon93
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Do you have a source for the claim that multiclassing levels also increase the companion's HP? Most multiclassing features are based on class level, not character level. I'm unsure either way with this (Unearthed Arcana is playtest anyway, so wording is often not fully fleshed out), but you could improve your answer by justifying your claim.
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DavidCoffron The claim is purely based on the wording. Unless an errata comes, it's the way it works. But yes, it is playtest, so the DM is free to rule otherwise
    $endgroup$
    – BlueMoon93
    53 mins ago










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142944%2fdo-any-of-the-books-contain-magic-items-for-animal-companions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









10












$begingroup$

Magical Armor +1/+2/+3



The DMG doesn't specifically list e.g. "Plate Armor +2", but rather the following, generic description (DMG, p. 152):




Armor, +1 , +2 , OR +3



Armor (light, medium, or heavy), rare (+1), very rare (+2), or legendary (+3)



You have a bonus to AC while wearing this armor. The bonus is determined by its rarity.




So, for armor to be possibly available as +1, +2, or +3, it simply has to count as light, medium or heavy armor.



Now, armor is available for animals (called barding), in all varieties available to humanoids, just more expensive (see PHB p. 157). Since barding is therefore also categorized as either light, medium or heavy armor, it is consequentially also available in its magical variants. Therefore, items such as "Studded Leather Barding +2" can exist.



How you calculate the price is up to you: you can use the cost the equivalent magical armor for humanoids (see DMG p. 135 for magic item prices by rarity), plus the price difference between unenchanted humanoid and animal armor.

Alternatively, you can multiply the cost of the magical item by four, i.e. how barding prices are calculated for unenchanted armor. I would suggest the former, though, to avoid excessively high magical barding prices.




Note: mounts are not necessarily proficient in armor/barding, and - like humanoids - will suffer disadvantages if they wear armor that they are not proficient in. Thanks @David Coffron for bringing that up, and see this question for details.




Examples for price calculation (I'll be using the upper limit for magic item prices; again, see DMG p. 135 for magic item prices by rarity, and p. 152 for rarities of magical armor):



Option 1:



$ Studded Leather Barding +1 = Humanoid's Studded Leather +1 + (Studded Leather Barding - Humanoid's Studded Leather) = 5000gp + (4*45gp - 45gp) = 5135gp$



... or (again, only in the case of Studded Leather) 135gp more than whatever you would charge for a suit made for humanoids.

More general: take the price for a suit of magical armor made for humanoids, and add 3 times the value of unenchanted barding of the same armor variety. Magical plate armor for animals would, therefore, be $ 3 * 1500gp = 4500gp $ more expensive than the humanoid equivalent.



Option 2:



$ Studded Leather Barding +1 = Humanoid's Studded Leather +1 * 4 = 5000gp * 4 = 20000gp $



This is easier to calculate, but absurdly expensive. I would advise using option 1.



All other items that are logically wearable by an animal



The DMG states the following on page 141:




When a nonhumanoid tries to wear an item, use your discretion as to whether the item functions as intended. A ring placed on a tentacle might work, but a yuan-ti with a snakelike tail instead of legs can't wear boots.




Therefore, your ranger's panther can't use a magical sword (or nonmagical swords, for that matter), but e.g. an Amulet of Health (CON=19, unless already higher) or a Ring of Protection (AC+1) shouldn't be an issue.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Great and thorough answer! Normally option 1 seems solid, but in my homebrew world – dealing in magic items is a shady/deadly business, and the PC's already have about 3-4 magic items each – I'll go for option 2.
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    3 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It may be worth mentioning that most beasts will lack proficiency in armor and be penalized for wearing barding.
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DavidCoffron thanks for mentioning that! I added a paragraph about proficiency to my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    1 hour ago















10












$begingroup$

Magical Armor +1/+2/+3



The DMG doesn't specifically list e.g. "Plate Armor +2", but rather the following, generic description (DMG, p. 152):




Armor, +1 , +2 , OR +3



Armor (light, medium, or heavy), rare (+1), very rare (+2), or legendary (+3)



You have a bonus to AC while wearing this armor. The bonus is determined by its rarity.




So, for armor to be possibly available as +1, +2, or +3, it simply has to count as light, medium or heavy armor.



Now, armor is available for animals (called barding), in all varieties available to humanoids, just more expensive (see PHB p. 157). Since barding is therefore also categorized as either light, medium or heavy armor, it is consequentially also available in its magical variants. Therefore, items such as "Studded Leather Barding +2" can exist.



How you calculate the price is up to you: you can use the cost the equivalent magical armor for humanoids (see DMG p. 135 for magic item prices by rarity), plus the price difference between unenchanted humanoid and animal armor.

Alternatively, you can multiply the cost of the magical item by four, i.e. how barding prices are calculated for unenchanted armor. I would suggest the former, though, to avoid excessively high magical barding prices.




Note: mounts are not necessarily proficient in armor/barding, and - like humanoids - will suffer disadvantages if they wear armor that they are not proficient in. Thanks @David Coffron for bringing that up, and see this question for details.




Examples for price calculation (I'll be using the upper limit for magic item prices; again, see DMG p. 135 for magic item prices by rarity, and p. 152 for rarities of magical armor):



Option 1:



$ Studded Leather Barding +1 = Humanoid's Studded Leather +1 + (Studded Leather Barding - Humanoid's Studded Leather) = 5000gp + (4*45gp - 45gp) = 5135gp$



... or (again, only in the case of Studded Leather) 135gp more than whatever you would charge for a suit made for humanoids.

More general: take the price for a suit of magical armor made for humanoids, and add 3 times the value of unenchanted barding of the same armor variety. Magical plate armor for animals would, therefore, be $ 3 * 1500gp = 4500gp $ more expensive than the humanoid equivalent.



Option 2:



$ Studded Leather Barding +1 = Humanoid's Studded Leather +1 * 4 = 5000gp * 4 = 20000gp $



This is easier to calculate, but absurdly expensive. I would advise using option 1.



All other items that are logically wearable by an animal



The DMG states the following on page 141:




When a nonhumanoid tries to wear an item, use your discretion as to whether the item functions as intended. A ring placed on a tentacle might work, but a yuan-ti with a snakelike tail instead of legs can't wear boots.




Therefore, your ranger's panther can't use a magical sword (or nonmagical swords, for that matter), but e.g. an Amulet of Health (CON=19, unless already higher) or a Ring of Protection (AC+1) shouldn't be an issue.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Great and thorough answer! Normally option 1 seems solid, but in my homebrew world – dealing in magic items is a shady/deadly business, and the PC's already have about 3-4 magic items each – I'll go for option 2.
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    3 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It may be worth mentioning that most beasts will lack proficiency in armor and be penalized for wearing barding.
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DavidCoffron thanks for mentioning that! I added a paragraph about proficiency to my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    1 hour ago













10












10








10





$begingroup$

Magical Armor +1/+2/+3



The DMG doesn't specifically list e.g. "Plate Armor +2", but rather the following, generic description (DMG, p. 152):




Armor, +1 , +2 , OR +3



Armor (light, medium, or heavy), rare (+1), very rare (+2), or legendary (+3)



You have a bonus to AC while wearing this armor. The bonus is determined by its rarity.




So, for armor to be possibly available as +1, +2, or +3, it simply has to count as light, medium or heavy armor.



Now, armor is available for animals (called barding), in all varieties available to humanoids, just more expensive (see PHB p. 157). Since barding is therefore also categorized as either light, medium or heavy armor, it is consequentially also available in its magical variants. Therefore, items such as "Studded Leather Barding +2" can exist.



How you calculate the price is up to you: you can use the cost the equivalent magical armor for humanoids (see DMG p. 135 for magic item prices by rarity), plus the price difference between unenchanted humanoid and animal armor.

Alternatively, you can multiply the cost of the magical item by four, i.e. how barding prices are calculated for unenchanted armor. I would suggest the former, though, to avoid excessively high magical barding prices.




Note: mounts are not necessarily proficient in armor/barding, and - like humanoids - will suffer disadvantages if they wear armor that they are not proficient in. Thanks @David Coffron for bringing that up, and see this question for details.




Examples for price calculation (I'll be using the upper limit for magic item prices; again, see DMG p. 135 for magic item prices by rarity, and p. 152 for rarities of magical armor):



Option 1:



$ Studded Leather Barding +1 = Humanoid's Studded Leather +1 + (Studded Leather Barding - Humanoid's Studded Leather) = 5000gp + (4*45gp - 45gp) = 5135gp$



... or (again, only in the case of Studded Leather) 135gp more than whatever you would charge for a suit made for humanoids.

More general: take the price for a suit of magical armor made for humanoids, and add 3 times the value of unenchanted barding of the same armor variety. Magical plate armor for animals would, therefore, be $ 3 * 1500gp = 4500gp $ more expensive than the humanoid equivalent.



Option 2:



$ Studded Leather Barding +1 = Humanoid's Studded Leather +1 * 4 = 5000gp * 4 = 20000gp $



This is easier to calculate, but absurdly expensive. I would advise using option 1.



All other items that are logically wearable by an animal



The DMG states the following on page 141:




When a nonhumanoid tries to wear an item, use your discretion as to whether the item functions as intended. A ring placed on a tentacle might work, but a yuan-ti with a snakelike tail instead of legs can't wear boots.




Therefore, your ranger's panther can't use a magical sword (or nonmagical swords, for that matter), but e.g. an Amulet of Health (CON=19, unless already higher) or a Ring of Protection (AC+1) shouldn't be an issue.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Magical Armor +1/+2/+3



The DMG doesn't specifically list e.g. "Plate Armor +2", but rather the following, generic description (DMG, p. 152):




Armor, +1 , +2 , OR +3



Armor (light, medium, or heavy), rare (+1), very rare (+2), or legendary (+3)



You have a bonus to AC while wearing this armor. The bonus is determined by its rarity.




So, for armor to be possibly available as +1, +2, or +3, it simply has to count as light, medium or heavy armor.



Now, armor is available for animals (called barding), in all varieties available to humanoids, just more expensive (see PHB p. 157). Since barding is therefore also categorized as either light, medium or heavy armor, it is consequentially also available in its magical variants. Therefore, items such as "Studded Leather Barding +2" can exist.



How you calculate the price is up to you: you can use the cost the equivalent magical armor for humanoids (see DMG p. 135 for magic item prices by rarity), plus the price difference between unenchanted humanoid and animal armor.

Alternatively, you can multiply the cost of the magical item by four, i.e. how barding prices are calculated for unenchanted armor. I would suggest the former, though, to avoid excessively high magical barding prices.




Note: mounts are not necessarily proficient in armor/barding, and - like humanoids - will suffer disadvantages if they wear armor that they are not proficient in. Thanks @David Coffron for bringing that up, and see this question for details.




Examples for price calculation (I'll be using the upper limit for magic item prices; again, see DMG p. 135 for magic item prices by rarity, and p. 152 for rarities of magical armor):



Option 1:



$ Studded Leather Barding +1 = Humanoid's Studded Leather +1 + (Studded Leather Barding - Humanoid's Studded Leather) = 5000gp + (4*45gp - 45gp) = 5135gp$



... or (again, only in the case of Studded Leather) 135gp more than whatever you would charge for a suit made for humanoids.

More general: take the price for a suit of magical armor made for humanoids, and add 3 times the value of unenchanted barding of the same armor variety. Magical plate armor for animals would, therefore, be $ 3 * 1500gp = 4500gp $ more expensive than the humanoid equivalent.



Option 2:



$ Studded Leather Barding +1 = Humanoid's Studded Leather +1 * 4 = 5000gp * 4 = 20000gp $



This is easier to calculate, but absurdly expensive. I would advise using option 1.



All other items that are logically wearable by an animal



The DMG states the following on page 141:




When a nonhumanoid tries to wear an item, use your discretion as to whether the item functions as intended. A ring placed on a tentacle might work, but a yuan-ti with a snakelike tail instead of legs can't wear boots.




Therefore, your ranger's panther can't use a magical sword (or nonmagical swords, for that matter), but e.g. an Amulet of Health (CON=19, unless already higher) or a Ring of Protection (AC+1) shouldn't be an issue.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago

























answered 4 hours ago









PixelMasterPixelMaster

11.3k244109




11.3k244109











  • $begingroup$
    Great and thorough answer! Normally option 1 seems solid, but in my homebrew world – dealing in magic items is a shady/deadly business, and the PC's already have about 3-4 magic items each – I'll go for option 2.
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    3 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It may be worth mentioning that most beasts will lack proficiency in armor and be penalized for wearing barding.
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DavidCoffron thanks for mentioning that! I added a paragraph about proficiency to my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    1 hour ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Great and thorough answer! Normally option 1 seems solid, but in my homebrew world – dealing in magic items is a shady/deadly business, and the PC's already have about 3-4 magic items each – I'll go for option 2.
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    3 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It may be worth mentioning that most beasts will lack proficiency in armor and be penalized for wearing barding.
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DavidCoffron thanks for mentioning that! I added a paragraph about proficiency to my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    1 hour ago















$begingroup$
Great and thorough answer! Normally option 1 seems solid, but in my homebrew world – dealing in magic items is a shady/deadly business, and the PC's already have about 3-4 magic items each – I'll go for option 2.
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
3 hours ago





$begingroup$
Great and thorough answer! Normally option 1 seems solid, but in my homebrew world – dealing in magic items is a shady/deadly business, and the PC's already have about 3-4 magic items each – I'll go for option 2.
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
3 hours ago





1




1




$begingroup$
It may be worth mentioning that most beasts will lack proficiency in armor and be penalized for wearing barding.
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
It may be worth mentioning that most beasts will lack proficiency in armor and be penalized for wearing barding.
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
@DavidCoffron thanks for mentioning that! I added a paragraph about proficiency to my answer.
$endgroup$
– PixelMaster
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@DavidCoffron thanks for mentioning that! I added a paragraph about proficiency to my answer.
$endgroup$
– PixelMaster
1 hour ago













3












$begingroup$

Yes, there is at least one option for armoring an animal companion.



As Can a Beast Master ranger armor their animal companion with barding? points out:




Barding is armor designed to protect an animal’s head, neck, chest, and body. Any type of armor shown on the Armor table in this chapter can be purchased as barding. The cost is four times the equivalent armor made for humanoids, and it weighs twice as much.




Since mounts can use armor through barding, it's safe to say an animal companion could do the same.



Source clarification



Part of your confusion could be caused by an unclarity in the index of the PHB. Although the index mentions to look under Shields and Armor (page 144-145) for barding, you should actually look under Mounts and Vehicles on page 155. And as Rubiksmoose points out in a comment:




When it says "see under x" it means to look under x in the index. In this case looking under "armor and shields" in the index you will see an entry for barding listed for p 155.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fwiw, the index thing is not actually an error, though it is confusing. When it says "see under x" it means to look under x in the index. In this case looking under "armor and shields" in the index you will see an entry for barding listed for p 155.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    You are right, and I'm amazed at how I could overlook that detail... thank you :) Will make a slight adjustment to the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    It may be worth mentioning that most beasts will lack proficiency in armor and be penalized for wearing barding.
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    2 hours ago















3












$begingroup$

Yes, there is at least one option for armoring an animal companion.



As Can a Beast Master ranger armor their animal companion with barding? points out:




Barding is armor designed to protect an animal’s head, neck, chest, and body. Any type of armor shown on the Armor table in this chapter can be purchased as barding. The cost is four times the equivalent armor made for humanoids, and it weighs twice as much.




Since mounts can use armor through barding, it's safe to say an animal companion could do the same.



Source clarification



Part of your confusion could be caused by an unclarity in the index of the PHB. Although the index mentions to look under Shields and Armor (page 144-145) for barding, you should actually look under Mounts and Vehicles on page 155. And as Rubiksmoose points out in a comment:




When it says "see under x" it means to look under x in the index. In this case looking under "armor and shields" in the index you will see an entry for barding listed for p 155.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fwiw, the index thing is not actually an error, though it is confusing. When it says "see under x" it means to look under x in the index. In this case looking under "armor and shields" in the index you will see an entry for barding listed for p 155.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    You are right, and I'm amazed at how I could overlook that detail... thank you :) Will make a slight adjustment to the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    It may be worth mentioning that most beasts will lack proficiency in armor and be penalized for wearing barding.
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    2 hours ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$

Yes, there is at least one option for armoring an animal companion.



As Can a Beast Master ranger armor their animal companion with barding? points out:




Barding is armor designed to protect an animal’s head, neck, chest, and body. Any type of armor shown on the Armor table in this chapter can be purchased as barding. The cost is four times the equivalent armor made for humanoids, and it weighs twice as much.




Since mounts can use armor through barding, it's safe to say an animal companion could do the same.



Source clarification



Part of your confusion could be caused by an unclarity in the index of the PHB. Although the index mentions to look under Shields and Armor (page 144-145) for barding, you should actually look under Mounts and Vehicles on page 155. And as Rubiksmoose points out in a comment:




When it says "see under x" it means to look under x in the index. In this case looking under "armor and shields" in the index you will see an entry for barding listed for p 155.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Yes, there is at least one option for armoring an animal companion.



As Can a Beast Master ranger armor their animal companion with barding? points out:




Barding is armor designed to protect an animal’s head, neck, chest, and body. Any type of armor shown on the Armor table in this chapter can be purchased as barding. The cost is four times the equivalent armor made for humanoids, and it weighs twice as much.




Since mounts can use armor through barding, it's safe to say an animal companion could do the same.



Source clarification



Part of your confusion could be caused by an unclarity in the index of the PHB. Although the index mentions to look under Shields and Armor (page 144-145) for barding, you should actually look under Mounts and Vehicles on page 155. And as Rubiksmoose points out in a comment:




When it says "see under x" it means to look under x in the index. In this case looking under "armor and shields" in the index you will see an entry for barding listed for p 155.








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 3 hours ago

























answered 4 hours ago









VadrukVadruk

2,58711558




2,58711558







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fwiw, the index thing is not actually an error, though it is confusing. When it says "see under x" it means to look under x in the index. In this case looking under "armor and shields" in the index you will see an entry for barding listed for p 155.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    You are right, and I'm amazed at how I could overlook that detail... thank you :) Will make a slight adjustment to the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    It may be worth mentioning that most beasts will lack proficiency in armor and be penalized for wearing barding.
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    2 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fwiw, the index thing is not actually an error, though it is confusing. When it says "see under x" it means to look under x in the index. In this case looking under "armor and shields" in the index you will see an entry for barding listed for p 155.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    You are right, and I'm amazed at how I could overlook that detail... thank you :) Will make a slight adjustment to the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    It may be worth mentioning that most beasts will lack proficiency in armor and be penalized for wearing barding.
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    2 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
Fwiw, the index thing is not actually an error, though it is confusing. When it says "see under x" it means to look under x in the index. In this case looking under "armor and shields" in the index you will see an entry for barding listed for p 155.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
3 hours ago





$begingroup$
Fwiw, the index thing is not actually an error, though it is confusing. When it says "see under x" it means to look under x in the index. In this case looking under "armor and shields" in the index you will see an entry for barding listed for p 155.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
3 hours ago













$begingroup$
You are right, and I'm amazed at how I could overlook that detail... thank you :) Will make a slight adjustment to the answer.
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
3 hours ago





$begingroup$
You are right, and I'm amazed at how I could overlook that detail... thank you :) Will make a slight adjustment to the answer.
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
3 hours ago













$begingroup$
It may be worth mentioning that most beasts will lack proficiency in armor and be penalized for wearing barding.
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
It may be worth mentioning that most beasts will lack proficiency in armor and be penalized for wearing barding.
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
2 hours ago











2












$begingroup$

Side-stepping the main question a bit, and going for a deeper issue... Your companion has its stats wrong.



Revised Ranger pets should be very durable.



Companions have tons of AC, even without barding custom armor:




An animal companion also adds its proficiency bonus to its AC.




They have lots of HP, which increases even when multiclassing:




For each level you gain after 3rd, your animal companion gains an additional hit die and increases its hit points accordingly.




Your panther companion should have 53HP (13 at level 3, 5HP/level after that) and 16AC (12 natural armor + proficiency).



If you want it even tankier, a single extra-level in Ranger gives the beast great saves:




At 7th level, while your companion can see you, it has advantage on all saving throws.




Now, if you pick a pet with 0 CON and play recklessly, yeah, the pet won't be very durable. But you can resurrect it with an 8h ritual, or heal it with hit dice on short rests. You can also pick more defensive pets (Black Bear), play them safely, or get them magical items (with DM fiat) to make them stronger. I refer to other answers for such items.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for pointing out the panther should have more HP and AC! The text doesn't mention class level, indeed. A little correction though: according to the UA, a ranger cannot summon the companion through a long rest: “With 8 hours of work and the expenditure of 25 gp worth of rare herbs and fine food, you call forth your companion’s spirit and use your magic to create a new body for it. You can return an animal companion to life in this manner even if you do not possess any part of its body.”
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    additon to @Vadruk's comment: a long rest also happens to be 8 hours long, but you have to spend 6 of those hours asleep, and the rest doing only light work. Therefore, you can't perform this ritual during a long rest.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh, my bad! I'll fix it
    $endgroup$
    – BlueMoon93
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Do you have a source for the claim that multiclassing levels also increase the companion's HP? Most multiclassing features are based on class level, not character level. I'm unsure either way with this (Unearthed Arcana is playtest anyway, so wording is often not fully fleshed out), but you could improve your answer by justifying your claim.
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DavidCoffron The claim is purely based on the wording. Unless an errata comes, it's the way it works. But yes, it is playtest, so the DM is free to rule otherwise
    $endgroup$
    – BlueMoon93
    53 mins ago















2












$begingroup$

Side-stepping the main question a bit, and going for a deeper issue... Your companion has its stats wrong.



Revised Ranger pets should be very durable.



Companions have tons of AC, even without barding custom armor:




An animal companion also adds its proficiency bonus to its AC.




They have lots of HP, which increases even when multiclassing:




For each level you gain after 3rd, your animal companion gains an additional hit die and increases its hit points accordingly.




Your panther companion should have 53HP (13 at level 3, 5HP/level after that) and 16AC (12 natural armor + proficiency).



If you want it even tankier, a single extra-level in Ranger gives the beast great saves:




At 7th level, while your companion can see you, it has advantage on all saving throws.




Now, if you pick a pet with 0 CON and play recklessly, yeah, the pet won't be very durable. But you can resurrect it with an 8h ritual, or heal it with hit dice on short rests. You can also pick more defensive pets (Black Bear), play them safely, or get them magical items (with DM fiat) to make them stronger. I refer to other answers for such items.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for pointing out the panther should have more HP and AC! The text doesn't mention class level, indeed. A little correction though: according to the UA, a ranger cannot summon the companion through a long rest: “With 8 hours of work and the expenditure of 25 gp worth of rare herbs and fine food, you call forth your companion’s spirit and use your magic to create a new body for it. You can return an animal companion to life in this manner even if you do not possess any part of its body.”
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    additon to @Vadruk's comment: a long rest also happens to be 8 hours long, but you have to spend 6 of those hours asleep, and the rest doing only light work. Therefore, you can't perform this ritual during a long rest.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh, my bad! I'll fix it
    $endgroup$
    – BlueMoon93
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Do you have a source for the claim that multiclassing levels also increase the companion's HP? Most multiclassing features are based on class level, not character level. I'm unsure either way with this (Unearthed Arcana is playtest anyway, so wording is often not fully fleshed out), but you could improve your answer by justifying your claim.
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DavidCoffron The claim is purely based on the wording. Unless an errata comes, it's the way it works. But yes, it is playtest, so the DM is free to rule otherwise
    $endgroup$
    – BlueMoon93
    53 mins ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$

Side-stepping the main question a bit, and going for a deeper issue... Your companion has its stats wrong.



Revised Ranger pets should be very durable.



Companions have tons of AC, even without barding custom armor:




An animal companion also adds its proficiency bonus to its AC.




They have lots of HP, which increases even when multiclassing:




For each level you gain after 3rd, your animal companion gains an additional hit die and increases its hit points accordingly.




Your panther companion should have 53HP (13 at level 3, 5HP/level after that) and 16AC (12 natural armor + proficiency).



If you want it even tankier, a single extra-level in Ranger gives the beast great saves:




At 7th level, while your companion can see you, it has advantage on all saving throws.




Now, if you pick a pet with 0 CON and play recklessly, yeah, the pet won't be very durable. But you can resurrect it with an 8h ritual, or heal it with hit dice on short rests. You can also pick more defensive pets (Black Bear), play them safely, or get them magical items (with DM fiat) to make them stronger. I refer to other answers for such items.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Side-stepping the main question a bit, and going for a deeper issue... Your companion has its stats wrong.



Revised Ranger pets should be very durable.



Companions have tons of AC, even without barding custom armor:




An animal companion also adds its proficiency bonus to its AC.




They have lots of HP, which increases even when multiclassing:




For each level you gain after 3rd, your animal companion gains an additional hit die and increases its hit points accordingly.




Your panther companion should have 53HP (13 at level 3, 5HP/level after that) and 16AC (12 natural armor + proficiency).



If you want it even tankier, a single extra-level in Ranger gives the beast great saves:




At 7th level, while your companion can see you, it has advantage on all saving throws.




Now, if you pick a pet with 0 CON and play recklessly, yeah, the pet won't be very durable. But you can resurrect it with an 8h ritual, or heal it with hit dice on short rests. You can also pick more defensive pets (Black Bear), play them safely, or get them magical items (with DM fiat) to make them stronger. I refer to other answers for such items.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 3 hours ago

























answered 4 hours ago









BlueMoon93BlueMoon93

14.6k1181146




14.6k1181146











  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for pointing out the panther should have more HP and AC! The text doesn't mention class level, indeed. A little correction though: according to the UA, a ranger cannot summon the companion through a long rest: “With 8 hours of work and the expenditure of 25 gp worth of rare herbs and fine food, you call forth your companion’s spirit and use your magic to create a new body for it. You can return an animal companion to life in this manner even if you do not possess any part of its body.”
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    additon to @Vadruk's comment: a long rest also happens to be 8 hours long, but you have to spend 6 of those hours asleep, and the rest doing only light work. Therefore, you can't perform this ritual during a long rest.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh, my bad! I'll fix it
    $endgroup$
    – BlueMoon93
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Do you have a source for the claim that multiclassing levels also increase the companion's HP? Most multiclassing features are based on class level, not character level. I'm unsure either way with this (Unearthed Arcana is playtest anyway, so wording is often not fully fleshed out), but you could improve your answer by justifying your claim.
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DavidCoffron The claim is purely based on the wording. Unless an errata comes, it's the way it works. But yes, it is playtest, so the DM is free to rule otherwise
    $endgroup$
    – BlueMoon93
    53 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for pointing out the panther should have more HP and AC! The text doesn't mention class level, indeed. A little correction though: according to the UA, a ranger cannot summon the companion through a long rest: “With 8 hours of work and the expenditure of 25 gp worth of rare herbs and fine food, you call forth your companion’s spirit and use your magic to create a new body for it. You can return an animal companion to life in this manner even if you do not possess any part of its body.”
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    additon to @Vadruk's comment: a long rest also happens to be 8 hours long, but you have to spend 6 of those hours asleep, and the rest doing only light work. Therefore, you can't perform this ritual during a long rest.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh, my bad! I'll fix it
    $endgroup$
    – BlueMoon93
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Do you have a source for the claim that multiclassing levels also increase the companion's HP? Most multiclassing features are based on class level, not character level. I'm unsure either way with this (Unearthed Arcana is playtest anyway, so wording is often not fully fleshed out), but you could improve your answer by justifying your claim.
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DavidCoffron The claim is purely based on the wording. Unless an errata comes, it's the way it works. But yes, it is playtest, so the DM is free to rule otherwise
    $endgroup$
    – BlueMoon93
    53 mins ago















$begingroup$
Thanks for pointing out the panther should have more HP and AC! The text doesn't mention class level, indeed. A little correction though: according to the UA, a ranger cannot summon the companion through a long rest: “With 8 hours of work and the expenditure of 25 gp worth of rare herbs and fine food, you call forth your companion’s spirit and use your magic to create a new body for it. You can return an animal companion to life in this manner even if you do not possess any part of its body.”
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Thanks for pointing out the panther should have more HP and AC! The text doesn't mention class level, indeed. A little correction though: according to the UA, a ranger cannot summon the companion through a long rest: “With 8 hours of work and the expenditure of 25 gp worth of rare herbs and fine food, you call forth your companion’s spirit and use your magic to create a new body for it. You can return an animal companion to life in this manner even if you do not possess any part of its body.”
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
4 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
additon to @Vadruk's comment: a long rest also happens to be 8 hours long, but you have to spend 6 of those hours asleep, and the rest doing only light work. Therefore, you can't perform this ritual during a long rest.
$endgroup$
– PixelMaster
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
additon to @Vadruk's comment: a long rest also happens to be 8 hours long, but you have to spend 6 of those hours asleep, and the rest doing only light work. Therefore, you can't perform this ritual during a long rest.
$endgroup$
– PixelMaster
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
Oh, my bad! I'll fix it
$endgroup$
– BlueMoon93
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Oh, my bad! I'll fix it
$endgroup$
– BlueMoon93
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
Do you have a source for the claim that multiclassing levels also increase the companion's HP? Most multiclassing features are based on class level, not character level. I'm unsure either way with this (Unearthed Arcana is playtest anyway, so wording is often not fully fleshed out), but you could improve your answer by justifying your claim.
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Do you have a source for the claim that multiclassing levels also increase the companion's HP? Most multiclassing features are based on class level, not character level. I'm unsure either way with this (Unearthed Arcana is playtest anyway, so wording is often not fully fleshed out), but you could improve your answer by justifying your claim.
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
@DavidCoffron The claim is purely based on the wording. Unless an errata comes, it's the way it works. But yes, it is playtest, so the DM is free to rule otherwise
$endgroup$
– BlueMoon93
53 mins ago




$begingroup$
@DavidCoffron The claim is purely based on the wording. Unless an errata comes, it's the way it works. But yes, it is playtest, so the DM is free to rule otherwise
$endgroup$
– BlueMoon93
53 mins ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142944%2fdo-any-of-the-books-contain-magic-items-for-animal-companions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-animal-companions, armor, dnd-5e, ranger

Popular posts from this blog

Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god existsWord for having a definite opinion while simultaneously withholding judgment?What's the opposite of “newcomer? Is ”veteran" OK?What do you call an “atheist” who might believe in an afterlife?What's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Word for someone who dismisses contrary opinions as irrational?Somone who thinks they are overly special/out of the ordinaryIs there a word, phrase or idiom for “a person who is incapable of thinking about the future”?The belief that a god is human-likeA word for a non-famous person/thing you have heard a lot aboutAdjective for a person who enjoys taking care of their appearance

What was this official D&D 3.5e Lovecraft-flavored rulebook?What was this set of RPG tools called?As a first-time DM should I let my players play complex character classes and roles?Nymph's Kiss and the RelationshipWhat was the name of this Cleric Prestige Class that shapes metal with its bare hands?Are the 3.5e Dragonlance books third party or official works?What's up with the domain Vile Darkness?What was this 80s book about RPGs?What was the name of this Werewolf band?What book had Rituals to “upgrade” animal companions to keep them viable at higher levels?What was this RPG that had rules for player-owned businesses?

2017 IndyCar Series Contents Series news Teams and drivers Schedule Season summary Footnotes References External links Navigation menu"INDYCAR: Initial 2018 bodywork concepts unveiled"the original"IndyCar confirms switch to Performance Friction brakes in 2017""AJ Foyt Racing will switch to Chevy"the original"Carlos Munoz, Conor Daly will drive for AJ Foyt Racing""Zach Veach's Indy 500 Debut Confirmed with Foyt""No mass exodus from Honda after Ganassi switch""Ex-F1 driver Sato joins Andretti Autosport for 2017 IndyCar season""IndyCar's Ryan Hunter-Reay, sponsor DHL paired through 2020""hhgregg and Andretti Autosport announce partnership for key races in 2016""INDYCAR: Rossi re-signs with Andretti"the original"McLaren Formula 1 - Fernando Alonso to race at Indy 500 with McLaren, Honda and Andretti Autosport""Shank will finally take part in Indy 500 with Harvey, Andretti | MotorSportsTalk""Andretti adds Jack Harvey to Indy 500 field""Ganassi switches to Honda power for 2017""INDYCAR: Chilton returns to Ganassi"the original"IndyCar silly season: Who's going where in 2017?""INDYCAR: Kanaan, NTT Data return to Ganassi"the original"Kimball to remain at Ganassi for 2017""Coyne confirms Bourdais for 2017 IndyCar season""Davison to sub for Bourdais in Indy 500"the original"Gutierrez confirmed for Detroit IndyCar debut""Gutierrez returns with Coyne for rest of 2017 season""Vautier to drive for Coyne at Texas"the original"INDYCAR: Coyne confirms Jones for 2017"the original"Pippa Mann returns to Coyne for Indy 500""Karam, Dreyer & Reinbold teaming up again for Indianapolis 500""Pigot to return to Ed Carpenter Racing""Hildebrand confirmed as full-time Ed Carpenter driver""Veach to replace injured Hildebrand at Barber"the originalNew Team Harding Racing Enters Chaves for 101st Indianapolis 500"Juncos Racing Announces Entry in 101st Running of the Indianapolis 500 :: Juncos Racing""Juncos confirms Pigot for Indy 500""Saavedra confirmed in Juncos' second 500 entry"the original"Lazier confirms Indy 500 run after son's USF2000 debut"the original"Claman DeMelo to race for RLLR at Sonoma"the original"Rahal signs Servia and ace engineer for 2017""IndyCar: Aleshin returns with Schmidt"the original"Aleshin replaced by Saavedra for Toronto""Jack Harvey will pilot SPM No. 7 car at Watkins Glen, Sonoma""Jay Howard confirmed in Tony Stewart's supported SPM Indy entry""INDYCAR: Newgarden to wave the flag at Penske"the original"Pagenaud opts for No. 1 in 2017"the original"Penske confirms Newgarden for 2017""Montoya to stay with Team Penske in 2017""Target leaving IndyCar after 27 seasons with Chip Ganassi""Cavin: IndyCar could see complete driver/team shakeup in 2017""End of the road for KV Racing?""KV Racing confirms closure, equipment sold to Juncos""Juncos confirms IndyCar Series entry"the original"Juncos readies IndyCar program, aims for '17 500"the original"Harding Racing to add Texas, Pocono to schedule"the original"Sato signs with Andretti Autosport for 2017""INDYCAR: Aleshin in Doubt at SPM"the original"Long Beach notebook: JR Hildebrand breaks hand""Hildebrand cleared to return at Phoenix"the original"Bourdais to undergo surgery on multiple fractures""Aleshin loses Schmidt Peterson IndyCar ride""Saavedra in at SPM for Pocono, Gateway"the original"Bourdais to make return at Gateway"the original"The IndyCar Grand Prix no longer is sponsored by Angie's List""2017 IndyCar Series rulebook""2017 Verizon IndyCar Series Official Rulebook"Official websiteeeeee