GPLv2 - licensing for commercial useWould I violate anything if I use vlclib for android in my closed-source app?Is it legal to charge for distributing the source of a software which uses GPLv2 components?GNU GPL LicensingCan I distribute unmodified GPLv2 binaries without the source code?How can a GPLv2 dependency affect licensing of adjacent components that form an aggregate project?Using GPL licensed library over a service for non-GPL softwareslicense - how to skip GPLv2Is this restriction of Cheerp community edition in violation of GPLv2?FPDF & GPLv2 & distributing changed codeEffect of 'download separately' on GPL linking
Is there any way to click on 6th item of this list
Single word request: Harming the benefactor
Why is this plane circling around the LKO airport every day?
Why would one plane in this picture not have gear down yet?
Good for you! in Russian
Examples of a statistic that is not independent of sample's distribution?
How are showroom/display vehicles prepared?
Why does the negative sign arise in this thermodynamic relation?
Is this combination of Quivering Palm and Haste RAW?
How to pass a string to a command that expects a file?
Distinction between apt-cache and dpkg -l
PTIJ: where are Tzafra and Urta located?
How to create a hard link to an inode (ext4)?
Grey hair or white hair
Reverse string, can I make it faster?
How do I express some one as a black person?
Finding algorithms of QGIS commands?
Force user to remove USB token
Why was Goose renamed from Chewie for the Captain Marvel film?
Is "history" a male-biased word ("his+story")?
Is there an elementary proof that there are infinitely many primes that are *not* completely split in an abelian extension?
How strictly should I take "Candidates must be local"?
How do I deal with a powergamer in a game full of beginners in a school club?
Could you please stop shuffling the deck and play already?
GPLv2 - licensing for commercial use
Would I violate anything if I use vlclib for android in my closed-source app?Is it legal to charge for distributing the source of a software which uses GPLv2 components?GNU GPL LicensingCan I distribute unmodified GPLv2 binaries without the source code?How can a GPLv2 dependency affect licensing of adjacent components that form an aggregate project?Using GPL licensed library over a service for non-GPL softwareslicense - how to skip GPLv2Is this restriction of Cheerp community edition in violation of GPLv2?FPDF & GPLv2 & distributing changed codeEffect of 'download separately' on GPL linking
I have a few questions regarding the GPLv2 license:
For it to be GPLv2, I need provide access to my source files?
If I use the v2 license, but charge for use, do users HAVE to purchase my license in order to use it?
What is the alternative license in creating software if I want to charge for it?
licensing commercial gpl-2
edited 2 hours ago
unor
3,8591443
asked 9 hours ago
CptnCptn
191
New contributor
Cptn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I have a few questions regarding the GPLv2 license:
For it to be GPLv2, I need provide access to my source files?
If I use the v2 license, but charge for use, do users HAVE to purchase my license in order to use it?
What is the alternative license in creating software if I want to charge for it?
licensing commercial gpl-2
edited 2 hours ago
unor
3,8591443
asked 9 hours ago
CptnCptn
191
New contributor
Cptn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
3. This is known as a "proprietary license" or "EULA". Each software product or company tends to have a slightly different one, written by its lawyers.
– Brandin
6 hours ago
1. If you do not provide source files, you can alternatively provide a "Written Offer". See the GPL license for more about this.
– Brandin
6 hours ago
@Brandin That still means providing access to the source files, though - if someone takes you up on that offer, you can't just refuse, you've legally agreed that you will send them something if they ask. See also the FSF FAQ.
– IMSoP
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I have a few questions regarding the GPLv2 license:
For it to be GPLv2, I need provide access to my source files?
If I use the v2 license, but charge for use, do users HAVE to purchase my license in order to use it?
What is the alternative license in creating software if I want to charge for it?
licensing commercial gpl-2
edited 2 hours ago
unor
3,8591443
asked 9 hours ago
CptnCptn
191
New contributor
Cptn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I have a few questions regarding the GPLv2 license:
For it to be GPLv2, I need provide access to my source files?
If I use the v2 license, but charge for use, do users HAVE to purchase my license in order to use it?
What is the alternative license in creating software if I want to charge for it?
licensing commercial gpl-2
licensing commercial gpl-2
edited 2 hours ago
unor
3,8591443
asked 9 hours ago
CptnCptn
191
New contributor
Cptn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 2 hours ago
unor
3,8591443
asked 9 hours ago
CptnCptn
191
New contributor
Cptn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 2 hours ago
unor
3,8591443
edited 2 hours ago
unor
3,8591443
edited 2 hours ago
unor
3,8591443
3,8591443
asked 9 hours ago
CptnCptn
191
New contributor
Cptn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 9 hours ago
CptnCptn
191
asked 9 hours ago
CptnCptn
191
191
New contributor
Cptn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Cptn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Cptn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
3. This is known as a "proprietary license" or "EULA". Each software product or company tends to have a slightly different one, written by its lawyers.
– Brandin
6 hours ago
1. If you do not provide source files, you can alternatively provide a "Written Offer". See the GPL license for more about this.
– Brandin
6 hours ago
@Brandin That still means providing access to the source files, though - if someone takes you up on that offer, you can't just refuse, you've legally agreed that you will send them something if they ask. See also the FSF FAQ.
– IMSoP
1 hour ago
add a comment |
3. This is known as a "proprietary license" or "EULA". Each software product or company tends to have a slightly different one, written by its lawyers.
– Brandin
6 hours ago
1. If you do not provide source files, you can alternatively provide a "Written Offer". See the GPL license for more about this.
– Brandin
6 hours ago
@Brandin That still means providing access to the source files, though - if someone takes you up on that offer, you can't just refuse, you've legally agreed that you will send them something if they ask. See also the FSF FAQ.
– IMSoP
1 hour ago
3. This is known as a "proprietary license" or "EULA". Each software product or company tends to have a slightly different one, written by its lawyers.
– Brandin
6 hours ago
3. This is known as a "proprietary license" or "EULA". Each software product or company tends to have a slightly different one, written by its lawyers.
– Brandin
6 hours ago
1. If you do not provide source files, you can alternatively provide a "Written Offer". See the GPL license for more about this.
– Brandin
6 hours ago
1. If you do not provide source files, you can alternatively provide a "Written Offer". See the GPL license for more about this.
– Brandin
6 hours ago
@Brandin That still means providing access to the source files, though - if someone takes you up on that offer, you can't just refuse, you've legally agreed that you will send them something if they ask. See also the FSF FAQ.
– IMSoP
1 hour ago
@Brandin That still means providing access to the source files, though - if someone takes you up on that offer, you can't just refuse, you've legally agreed that you will send them something if they ask. See also the FSF FAQ.
– IMSoP
1 hour ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Yes, to people to whom you have distributed the binary.
No, they can also get it from someone else who has a (presumably paid-for) binary, and lawfully use that copy. Because GPLv2 s3 says "You may copy and distribute the Program ... in object code or executable form" someone who gets the software from you has the right to copy it for their friends, and because s0 says "The act of running the Program is not restricted" anyone who comes into possession of such a copy may use it. s6 makes their position even clearer: it explicitly gives them a licence from you to do so.
The GNU GPL is fine with you charging for your software; it just requires you to deliver freedom along with your binary. If what you're asking is "what licence should I use if I want to charge for my software and forbid my paying users from exercising the freedoms associated with free software", that would be off-topic for this site.
answered 8 hours ago
MadHatterMadHatter
9,5421837
When I see the phrase "deliver freedom", I envision an accompanying Team America: World Police montage.
– R.M.
17 mins ago
add a comment |
For it to be GPLv2, I need provide access to my source files?
If you create software that includes someone else's GPL-licensed code (in such a way that your software is a derivative of the other code under copyright law) then you must make available to recipients of your software (if any) the complete corresponding source code of your software, under the same GPL terms. Failure to do so makes you liable for copyright infringement.
If you are not using any GPL-licensed material from other authors, but merely decide to license your work under the GPL, you have no obligations to yourself (even if you did, you can't sue yourself anyway for violating your own terms) but you will create obligations for downstream recipients who incorporate your software into their own work.
If I use the v2 license, but charge for use, do users HAVE to purchase my license in order to use it?
No. Users may obtain the software from other users who purchased copies from you. You cannot prevent users who purchase a copy from sharing copies to other people, and you cannot prevent those secondhand recipients from enjoying the same freedom to use, modify, and redistribute the software.
What is the alternative license in creating software if I want to charge for it?
The GPL does not stop you from charging for the software; you may indeed legally sell GPL-licensed software for profit. However, you cannot have a monopoly on distribution, since all recipients could begin offering the software for a lower price, or free of charge. Any free software license has this property.
If you want a monopoly on distribution, you do not want to use a free or open source license.
answered 13 mins ago
apsillers♦apsillers
15.5k12652
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "619"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Cptn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fopensource.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f8064%2fgplv2-licensing-for-commercial-use%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes, to people to whom you have distributed the binary.
No, they can also get it from someone else who has a (presumably paid-for) binary, and lawfully use that copy. Because GPLv2 s3 says "You may copy and distribute the Program ... in object code or executable form" someone who gets the software from you has the right to copy it for their friends, and because s0 says "The act of running the Program is not restricted" anyone who comes into possession of such a copy may use it. s6 makes their position even clearer: it explicitly gives them a licence from you to do so.
The GNU GPL is fine with you charging for your software; it just requires you to deliver freedom along with your binary. If what you're asking is "what licence should I use if I want to charge for my software and forbid my paying users from exercising the freedoms associated with free software", that would be off-topic for this site.
answered 8 hours ago
MadHatterMadHatter
9,5421837
When I see the phrase "deliver freedom", I envision an accompanying Team America: World Police montage.
– R.M.
17 mins ago
add a comment |
Yes, to people to whom you have distributed the binary.
No, they can also get it from someone else who has a (presumably paid-for) binary, and lawfully use that copy. Because GPLv2 s3 says "You may copy and distribute the Program ... in object code or executable form" someone who gets the software from you has the right to copy it for their friends, and because s0 says "The act of running the Program is not restricted" anyone who comes into possession of such a copy may use it. s6 makes their position even clearer: it explicitly gives them a licence from you to do so.
The GNU GPL is fine with you charging for your software; it just requires you to deliver freedom along with your binary. If what you're asking is "what licence should I use if I want to charge for my software and forbid my paying users from exercising the freedoms associated with free software", that would be off-topic for this site.
answered 8 hours ago
MadHatterMadHatter
9,5421837
When I see the phrase "deliver freedom", I envision an accompanying Team America: World Police montage.
– R.M.
17 mins ago
add a comment |
Yes, to people to whom you have distributed the binary.
No, they can also get it from someone else who has a (presumably paid-for) binary, and lawfully use that copy. Because GPLv2 s3 says "You may copy and distribute the Program ... in object code or executable form" someone who gets the software from you has the right to copy it for their friends, and because s0 says "The act of running the Program is not restricted" anyone who comes into possession of such a copy may use it. s6 makes their position even clearer: it explicitly gives them a licence from you to do so.
The GNU GPL is fine with you charging for your software; it just requires you to deliver freedom along with your binary. If what you're asking is "what licence should I use if I want to charge for my software and forbid my paying users from exercising the freedoms associated with free software", that would be off-topic for this site.
answered 8 hours ago
MadHatterMadHatter
9,5421837
Yes, to people to whom you have distributed the binary.
No, they can also get it from someone else who has a (presumably paid-for) binary, and lawfully use that copy. Because GPLv2 s3 says "You may copy and distribute the Program ... in object code or executable form" someone who gets the software from you has the right to copy it for their friends, and because s0 says "The act of running the Program is not restricted" anyone who comes into possession of such a copy may use it. s6 makes their position even clearer: it explicitly gives them a licence from you to do so.
The GNU GPL is fine with you charging for your software; it just requires you to deliver freedom along with your binary. If what you're asking is "what licence should I use if I want to charge for my software and forbid my paying users from exercising the freedoms associated with free software", that would be off-topic for this site.
answered 8 hours ago
MadHatterMadHatter
9,5421837
edited 5 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
MadHatterMadHatter
9,5421837
answered 8 hours ago
MadHatterMadHatter
9,5421837
answered 8 hours ago
MadHatterMadHatter
9,5421837
9,5421837
When I see the phrase "deliver freedom", I envision an accompanying Team America: World Police montage.
– R.M.
17 mins ago
add a comment |
When I see the phrase "deliver freedom", I envision an accompanying Team America: World Police montage.
– R.M.
17 mins ago
When I see the phrase "deliver freedom", I envision an accompanying Team America: World Police montage.
– R.M.
17 mins ago
When I see the phrase "deliver freedom", I envision an accompanying Team America: World Police montage.
– R.M.
17 mins ago
add a comment |
For it to be GPLv2, I need provide access to my source files?
If you create software that includes someone else's GPL-licensed code (in such a way that your software is a derivative of the other code under copyright law) then you must make available to recipients of your software (if any) the complete corresponding source code of your software, under the same GPL terms. Failure to do so makes you liable for copyright infringement.
If you are not using any GPL-licensed material from other authors, but merely decide to license your work under the GPL, you have no obligations to yourself (even if you did, you can't sue yourself anyway for violating your own terms) but you will create obligations for downstream recipients who incorporate your software into their own work.
If I use the v2 license, but charge for use, do users HAVE to purchase my license in order to use it?
No. Users may obtain the software from other users who purchased copies from you. You cannot prevent users who purchase a copy from sharing copies to other people, and you cannot prevent those secondhand recipients from enjoying the same freedom to use, modify, and redistribute the software.
What is the alternative license in creating software if I want to charge for it?
The GPL does not stop you from charging for the software; you may indeed legally sell GPL-licensed software for profit. However, you cannot have a monopoly on distribution, since all recipients could begin offering the software for a lower price, or free of charge. Any free software license has this property.
If you want a monopoly on distribution, you do not want to use a free or open source license.
answered 13 mins ago
apsillers♦apsillers
15.5k12652
add a comment |
For it to be GPLv2, I need provide access to my source files?
If you create software that includes someone else's GPL-licensed code (in such a way that your software is a derivative of the other code under copyright law) then you must make available to recipients of your software (if any) the complete corresponding source code of your software, under the same GPL terms. Failure to do so makes you liable for copyright infringement.
If you are not using any GPL-licensed material from other authors, but merely decide to license your work under the GPL, you have no obligations to yourself (even if you did, you can't sue yourself anyway for violating your own terms) but you will create obligations for downstream recipients who incorporate your software into their own work.
If I use the v2 license, but charge for use, do users HAVE to purchase my license in order to use it?
No. Users may obtain the software from other users who purchased copies from you. You cannot prevent users who purchase a copy from sharing copies to other people, and you cannot prevent those secondhand recipients from enjoying the same freedom to use, modify, and redistribute the software.
What is the alternative license in creating software if I want to charge for it?
The GPL does not stop you from charging for the software; you may indeed legally sell GPL-licensed software for profit. However, you cannot have a monopoly on distribution, since all recipients could begin offering the software for a lower price, or free of charge. Any free software license has this property.
If you want a monopoly on distribution, you do not want to use a free or open source license.
answered 13 mins ago
apsillers♦apsillers
15.5k12652
add a comment |
For it to be GPLv2, I need provide access to my source files?
If you create software that includes someone else's GPL-licensed code (in such a way that your software is a derivative of the other code under copyright law) then you must make available to recipients of your software (if any) the complete corresponding source code of your software, under the same GPL terms. Failure to do so makes you liable for copyright infringement.
If you are not using any GPL-licensed material from other authors, but merely decide to license your work under the GPL, you have no obligations to yourself (even if you did, you can't sue yourself anyway for violating your own terms) but you will create obligations for downstream recipients who incorporate your software into their own work.
If I use the v2 license, but charge for use, do users HAVE to purchase my license in order to use it?
No. Users may obtain the software from other users who purchased copies from you. You cannot prevent users who purchase a copy from sharing copies to other people, and you cannot prevent those secondhand recipients from enjoying the same freedom to use, modify, and redistribute the software.
What is the alternative license in creating software if I want to charge for it?
The GPL does not stop you from charging for the software; you may indeed legally sell GPL-licensed software for profit. However, you cannot have a monopoly on distribution, since all recipients could begin offering the software for a lower price, or free of charge. Any free software license has this property.
If you want a monopoly on distribution, you do not want to use a free or open source license.
answered 13 mins ago
apsillers♦apsillers
15.5k12652
For it to be GPLv2, I need provide access to my source files?
If you create software that includes someone else's GPL-licensed code (in such a way that your software is a derivative of the other code under copyright law) then you must make available to recipients of your software (if any) the complete corresponding source code of your software, under the same GPL terms. Failure to do so makes you liable for copyright infringement.
If you are not using any GPL-licensed material from other authors, but merely decide to license your work under the GPL, you have no obligations to yourself (even if you did, you can't sue yourself anyway for violating your own terms) but you will create obligations for downstream recipients who incorporate your software into their own work.
If I use the v2 license, but charge for use, do users HAVE to purchase my license in order to use it?
No. Users may obtain the software from other users who purchased copies from you. You cannot prevent users who purchase a copy from sharing copies to other people, and you cannot prevent those secondhand recipients from enjoying the same freedom to use, modify, and redistribute the software.
What is the alternative license in creating software if I want to charge for it?
The GPL does not stop you from charging for the software; you may indeed legally sell GPL-licensed software for profit. However, you cannot have a monopoly on distribution, since all recipients could begin offering the software for a lower price, or free of charge. Any free software license has this property.
If you want a monopoly on distribution, you do not want to use a free or open source license.
answered 13 mins ago
apsillers♦apsillers
15.5k12652
answered 13 mins ago
apsillers♦apsillers
15.5k12652
answered 13 mins ago
apsillers♦apsillers
15.5k12652
answered 13 mins ago
apsillers♦apsillers
15.5k12652
15.5k12652
add a comment |
add a comment |
Cptn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Cptn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Cptn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Cptn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Open Source Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fopensource.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f8064%2fgplv2-licensing-for-commercial-use%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
-commercial, gpl-2, licensing
3. This is known as a "proprietary license" or "EULA". Each software product or company tends to have a slightly different one, written by its lawyers.
– Brandin
6 hours ago
1. If you do not provide source files, you can alternatively provide a "Written Offer". See the GPL license for more about this.
– Brandin
6 hours ago
@Brandin That still means providing access to the source files, though - if someone takes you up on that offer, you can't just refuse, you've legally agreed that you will send them something if they ask. See also the FSF FAQ.
– IMSoP
1 hour ago