Qt Number Generator v2 Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)GUI Number Generator in QT C++Random Number Generator ClassTrying to find a good design for reading in values of different types from a fileOptimize random number generatorRandom number generator initialisationSimple random generatorRandom number generator in C#Generate cryptographically secure random numbers in a specific rangeC++ Random Phone Number GeneratorQuantum random number generatorGUI Number Generator in QT C++
Check which numbers satisfy the condition [A*B*C = A! + B! + C!]
What do you call a plan that's an alternative plan in case your initial plan fails?
I'm having difficulty getting my players to do stuff in a sandbox campaign
Book: boy meets a guy who gets killed, and escapes to a pocket dimension where inhabitants are versions of himself
Writing Thesis: Copying from published papers
Can rocky hills similar to the Scottish highlands be located next to a bog?
Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?
MacOS 10.14.4 update failing to fully load and cycling through boot attempts but not loading requiring full recovery
Slither Like a Snake
Why does tar appear to skip file contents when output file is /dev/null?
What are the pros and cons of Aerospike nosecones?
How do you clear the ApexPages.getMessages() collection in a test?
How to market an anarchic city as a tourism spot to people living in civilized areas?
Stopping real property loss from eroding embankment
90's teen horror novel where "Mike" goes on a date with a girl to see their favourite band "The Zombies"
cpython3 different behavior between running a file line by line in interpreter mode and "python3 file"
Autumning in love
How to say 'striped' in Latin
How to set input type 'Select' in ui_component grid in magento 2.1.16
Preparing odd integers using quantum computation
How to rotate it perfectly?
What do I do if technical issues prevent me from filing my return on time?
What are the options for player characters to create traps?
Are variable time comparisons always a security risk in cryptography code?
Qt Number Generator v2
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)GUI Number Generator in QT C++Random Number Generator ClassTrying to find a good design for reading in values of different types from a fileOptimize random number generatorRandom number generator initialisationSimple random generatorRandom number generator in C#Generate cryptographically secure random numbers in a specific rangeC++ Random Phone Number GeneratorQuantum random number generatorGUI Number Generator in QT C++
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
Link to the old question.
I tried to learn some new things from the answers and here's what I did:
- Used Qt Designer so that in
Config.h, all member variables and widget positioning are gone - User can't set the lower bound higher than the upper and vice versa
- Replaced obsolete
qrandwith generators from the C++11<random>library - Used the Qt5 version of
connect - Better UI with more options
I like code which can be read as plain English text, that's why I made functions such as _removeLastChar or _correctInputParameters which are basically one-liners but, for me, improve readability a lot.
Code-review IMHO taught me the most about code quality that is why I am asking this "new" version.

generator.h
#ifndef GENERATOR_H
#define GENERATOR_H
#include <QMainWindow>
class QSpinBox;
namespace Ui
class Generator;
class Generator : public QMainWindow
Q_OBJECT
public:
explicit Generator(QWidget *parent = nullptr);
~Generator();
public slots:
void generateNumber();
void clear();
void saveToFile();
void setMinValue(int);
void setMaxValue(int);
private:
Ui::Generator *ui;
qint32 _generateNumber();
QString _getSeparator();
QString _nums;
bool _correctInputParameters();
bool _oneLineOutput();
void _generateNumbers( int from, int to, bool random );
void _removeLastChar( QString& string );
;
#endif // GENERATOR_H
generator.cpp
#include "generator.h"
#include "ui_generator.h"
#include <random>
#include <iostream>
#include <QMessageBox>
#include <QTextStream>
#include <QFileDialog>
Generator::Generator(QWidget *parent)
: QMainWindow(parent)
, ui(new Ui::Generator)
ui->setupUi(this);
connect(ui->generateButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::generateNumber);
connect(ui->clearButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::clear);
connect(ui->saveButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::saveToFile);
connect(ui->exitButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &QApplication::exit);
connect(ui->minimumSpinBox, static_cast<void (QSpinBox::*)(int)>(&QSpinBox::valueChanged), this, &Generator::setMinValue);
connect(ui->maximumSpinBox, static_cast<void (QSpinBox::*)(int)>(&QSpinBox::valueChanged), this, &Generator::setMaxValue);
void Generator::generateNumber()
clear();
int numbersCount = ui->numbers->value ();
_nums = "";
// random numbers
if ( ui->random->isChecked () )
_generateNumbers (0, numbersCount, true);
// sequential numbers
else
int lower = ui->minimumSpinBox->value ();
int upper = ui->maximumSpinBox->value ();
_generateNumbers (lower, upper + 1, false);
ui->textEdit->setText (_nums);
void Generator::_generateNumbers( int low, int high, bool random )
QString separator = _getSeparator();
for ( qint32 i = low; i < high; ++i )
if ( random ) // random
_nums += QString::number ( _generateNumber () );
else // sequential
_nums += QString::number( i );
_nums += separator;
// output into multiple lines
if ( !_oneLineOutput () )
_nums += "n";
// get rid of the last separator char
if ( _oneLineOutput () && separator != "" ) _removeLastChar(_nums);
void Generator::saveToFile () QIODevice::Text) )
QMessageBox::information( this,
tr("Unable to open file"),
output.errorString() );
return;
QTextStream ts( &output );
ts << _nums.toUtf8 ();
output.close();
qint32 Generator::_generateNumber()
std::random_device rd;
std::default_random_engine eng(rd());
std::uniform_int_distribution< qint32 > distr( ui->minimumSpinBox->value (),
ui->maximumSpinBox->value () );
return distr(eng);
QString Generator::_getSeparator()
auto separator = ui->separator->currentText();
if ( separator == "(space)" ) return " ";
if ( separator == "(nothing)" ) return "";
return separator;
void Generator::setMinValue( int newValue )
auto maxValue = ui->maximumSpinBox->value ();
if ( newValue > maxValue ) ui->minimumSpinBox->setValue ( maxValue );
void Generator::setMaxValue ( int newValue )
auto minValue = ui->minimumSpinBox->value ();
if ( newValue < minValue ) ui->maximumSpinBox->setValue (minValue);
void Generator::clear ()
ui->textEdit->clear ();
void Generator::_removeLastChar( QString &string )
string.remove ( string.size () - 1, 1 );
bool Generator::_correctInputParameters()
return ui->minimumSpinBox->value () <= ui->maximumSpinBox->value ();
bool Generator::_oneLineOutput()
return ui->oneLine->isChecked ();
Generator::~Generator()
delete ui;
c++ c++11 random gui qt
New contributor
sliziky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Link to the old question.
I tried to learn some new things from the answers and here's what I did:
- Used Qt Designer so that in
Config.h, all member variables and widget positioning are gone - User can't set the lower bound higher than the upper and vice versa
- Replaced obsolete
qrandwith generators from the C++11<random>library - Used the Qt5 version of
connect - Better UI with more options
I like code which can be read as plain English text, that's why I made functions such as _removeLastChar or _correctInputParameters which are basically one-liners but, for me, improve readability a lot.
Code-review IMHO taught me the most about code quality that is why I am asking this "new" version.

generator.h
#ifndef GENERATOR_H
#define GENERATOR_H
#include <QMainWindow>
class QSpinBox;
namespace Ui
class Generator;
class Generator : public QMainWindow
Q_OBJECT
public:
explicit Generator(QWidget *parent = nullptr);
~Generator();
public slots:
void generateNumber();
void clear();
void saveToFile();
void setMinValue(int);
void setMaxValue(int);
private:
Ui::Generator *ui;
qint32 _generateNumber();
QString _getSeparator();
QString _nums;
bool _correctInputParameters();
bool _oneLineOutput();
void _generateNumbers( int from, int to, bool random );
void _removeLastChar( QString& string );
;
#endif // GENERATOR_H
generator.cpp
#include "generator.h"
#include "ui_generator.h"
#include <random>
#include <iostream>
#include <QMessageBox>
#include <QTextStream>
#include <QFileDialog>
Generator::Generator(QWidget *parent)
: QMainWindow(parent)
, ui(new Ui::Generator)
ui->setupUi(this);
connect(ui->generateButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::generateNumber);
connect(ui->clearButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::clear);
connect(ui->saveButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::saveToFile);
connect(ui->exitButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &QApplication::exit);
connect(ui->minimumSpinBox, static_cast<void (QSpinBox::*)(int)>(&QSpinBox::valueChanged), this, &Generator::setMinValue);
connect(ui->maximumSpinBox, static_cast<void (QSpinBox::*)(int)>(&QSpinBox::valueChanged), this, &Generator::setMaxValue);
void Generator::generateNumber()
clear();
int numbersCount = ui->numbers->value ();
_nums = "";
// random numbers
if ( ui->random->isChecked () )
_generateNumbers (0, numbersCount, true);
// sequential numbers
else
int lower = ui->minimumSpinBox->value ();
int upper = ui->maximumSpinBox->value ();
_generateNumbers (lower, upper + 1, false);
ui->textEdit->setText (_nums);
void Generator::_generateNumbers( int low, int high, bool random )
QString separator = _getSeparator();
for ( qint32 i = low; i < high; ++i )
if ( random ) // random
_nums += QString::number ( _generateNumber () );
else // sequential
_nums += QString::number( i );
_nums += separator;
// output into multiple lines
if ( !_oneLineOutput () )
_nums += "n";
// get rid of the last separator char
if ( _oneLineOutput () && separator != "" ) _removeLastChar(_nums);
void Generator::saveToFile () QIODevice::Text) )
QMessageBox::information( this,
tr("Unable to open file"),
output.errorString() );
return;
QTextStream ts( &output );
ts << _nums.toUtf8 ();
output.close();
qint32 Generator::_generateNumber()
std::random_device rd;
std::default_random_engine eng(rd());
std::uniform_int_distribution< qint32 > distr( ui->minimumSpinBox->value (),
ui->maximumSpinBox->value () );
return distr(eng);
QString Generator::_getSeparator()
auto separator = ui->separator->currentText();
if ( separator == "(space)" ) return " ";
if ( separator == "(nothing)" ) return "";
return separator;
void Generator::setMinValue( int newValue )
auto maxValue = ui->maximumSpinBox->value ();
if ( newValue > maxValue ) ui->minimumSpinBox->setValue ( maxValue );
void Generator::setMaxValue ( int newValue )
auto minValue = ui->minimumSpinBox->value ();
if ( newValue < minValue ) ui->maximumSpinBox->setValue (minValue);
void Generator::clear ()
ui->textEdit->clear ();
void Generator::_removeLastChar( QString &string )
string.remove ( string.size () - 1, 1 );
bool Generator::_correctInputParameters()
return ui->minimumSpinBox->value () <= ui->maximumSpinBox->value ();
bool Generator::_oneLineOutput()
return ui->oneLine->isChecked ();
Generator::~Generator()
delete ui;
c++ c++11 random gui qt
New contributor
sliziky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If you've used Designer, then the UI file you've edited is part of the complete code for review.
$endgroup$
– Toby Speight
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks. I originally wanted to show also.uifile but it contains ~500 lines so I decided not to. Should I append the.uinow when there is already the answer?
$endgroup$
– sliziky
41 mins ago
$begingroup$
Now that you have a review, you shouldn't add additional code to be reviewed; my comment was intended as a recommendation for future questions.
$endgroup$
– Toby Speight
39 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Link to the old question.
I tried to learn some new things from the answers and here's what I did:
- Used Qt Designer so that in
Config.h, all member variables and widget positioning are gone - User can't set the lower bound higher than the upper and vice versa
- Replaced obsolete
qrandwith generators from the C++11<random>library - Used the Qt5 version of
connect - Better UI with more options
I like code which can be read as plain English text, that's why I made functions such as _removeLastChar or _correctInputParameters which are basically one-liners but, for me, improve readability a lot.
Code-review IMHO taught me the most about code quality that is why I am asking this "new" version.

generator.h
#ifndef GENERATOR_H
#define GENERATOR_H
#include <QMainWindow>
class QSpinBox;
namespace Ui
class Generator;
class Generator : public QMainWindow
Q_OBJECT
public:
explicit Generator(QWidget *parent = nullptr);
~Generator();
public slots:
void generateNumber();
void clear();
void saveToFile();
void setMinValue(int);
void setMaxValue(int);
private:
Ui::Generator *ui;
qint32 _generateNumber();
QString _getSeparator();
QString _nums;
bool _correctInputParameters();
bool _oneLineOutput();
void _generateNumbers( int from, int to, bool random );
void _removeLastChar( QString& string );
;
#endif // GENERATOR_H
generator.cpp
#include "generator.h"
#include "ui_generator.h"
#include <random>
#include <iostream>
#include <QMessageBox>
#include <QTextStream>
#include <QFileDialog>
Generator::Generator(QWidget *parent)
: QMainWindow(parent)
, ui(new Ui::Generator)
ui->setupUi(this);
connect(ui->generateButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::generateNumber);
connect(ui->clearButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::clear);
connect(ui->saveButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::saveToFile);
connect(ui->exitButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &QApplication::exit);
connect(ui->minimumSpinBox, static_cast<void (QSpinBox::*)(int)>(&QSpinBox::valueChanged), this, &Generator::setMinValue);
connect(ui->maximumSpinBox, static_cast<void (QSpinBox::*)(int)>(&QSpinBox::valueChanged), this, &Generator::setMaxValue);
void Generator::generateNumber()
clear();
int numbersCount = ui->numbers->value ();
_nums = "";
// random numbers
if ( ui->random->isChecked () )
_generateNumbers (0, numbersCount, true);
// sequential numbers
else
int lower = ui->minimumSpinBox->value ();
int upper = ui->maximumSpinBox->value ();
_generateNumbers (lower, upper + 1, false);
ui->textEdit->setText (_nums);
void Generator::_generateNumbers( int low, int high, bool random )
QString separator = _getSeparator();
for ( qint32 i = low; i < high; ++i )
if ( random ) // random
_nums += QString::number ( _generateNumber () );
else // sequential
_nums += QString::number( i );
_nums += separator;
// output into multiple lines
if ( !_oneLineOutput () )
_nums += "n";
// get rid of the last separator char
if ( _oneLineOutput () && separator != "" ) _removeLastChar(_nums);
void Generator::saveToFile () QIODevice::Text) )
QMessageBox::information( this,
tr("Unable to open file"),
output.errorString() );
return;
QTextStream ts( &output );
ts << _nums.toUtf8 ();
output.close();
qint32 Generator::_generateNumber()
std::random_device rd;
std::default_random_engine eng(rd());
std::uniform_int_distribution< qint32 > distr( ui->minimumSpinBox->value (),
ui->maximumSpinBox->value () );
return distr(eng);
QString Generator::_getSeparator()
auto separator = ui->separator->currentText();
if ( separator == "(space)" ) return " ";
if ( separator == "(nothing)" ) return "";
return separator;
void Generator::setMinValue( int newValue )
auto maxValue = ui->maximumSpinBox->value ();
if ( newValue > maxValue ) ui->minimumSpinBox->setValue ( maxValue );
void Generator::setMaxValue ( int newValue )
auto minValue = ui->minimumSpinBox->value ();
if ( newValue < minValue ) ui->maximumSpinBox->setValue (minValue);
void Generator::clear ()
ui->textEdit->clear ();
void Generator::_removeLastChar( QString &string )
string.remove ( string.size () - 1, 1 );
bool Generator::_correctInputParameters()
return ui->minimumSpinBox->value () <= ui->maximumSpinBox->value ();
bool Generator::_oneLineOutput()
return ui->oneLine->isChecked ();
Generator::~Generator()
delete ui;
c++ c++11 random gui qt
New contributor
sliziky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Link to the old question.
I tried to learn some new things from the answers and here's what I did:
- Used Qt Designer so that in
Config.h, all member variables and widget positioning are gone - User can't set the lower bound higher than the upper and vice versa
- Replaced obsolete
qrandwith generators from the C++11<random>library - Used the Qt5 version of
connect - Better UI with more options
I like code which can be read as plain English text, that's why I made functions such as _removeLastChar or _correctInputParameters which are basically one-liners but, for me, improve readability a lot.
Code-review IMHO taught me the most about code quality that is why I am asking this "new" version.

generator.h
#ifndef GENERATOR_H
#define GENERATOR_H
#include <QMainWindow>
class QSpinBox;
namespace Ui
class Generator;
class Generator : public QMainWindow
Q_OBJECT
public:
explicit Generator(QWidget *parent = nullptr);
~Generator();
public slots:
void generateNumber();
void clear();
void saveToFile();
void setMinValue(int);
void setMaxValue(int);
private:
Ui::Generator *ui;
qint32 _generateNumber();
QString _getSeparator();
QString _nums;
bool _correctInputParameters();
bool _oneLineOutput();
void _generateNumbers( int from, int to, bool random );
void _removeLastChar( QString& string );
;
#endif // GENERATOR_H
generator.cpp
#include "generator.h"
#include "ui_generator.h"
#include <random>
#include <iostream>
#include <QMessageBox>
#include <QTextStream>
#include <QFileDialog>
Generator::Generator(QWidget *parent)
: QMainWindow(parent)
, ui(new Ui::Generator)
ui->setupUi(this);
connect(ui->generateButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::generateNumber);
connect(ui->clearButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::clear);
connect(ui->saveButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::saveToFile);
connect(ui->exitButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &QApplication::exit);
connect(ui->minimumSpinBox, static_cast<void (QSpinBox::*)(int)>(&QSpinBox::valueChanged), this, &Generator::setMinValue);
connect(ui->maximumSpinBox, static_cast<void (QSpinBox::*)(int)>(&QSpinBox::valueChanged), this, &Generator::setMaxValue);
void Generator::generateNumber()
clear();
int numbersCount = ui->numbers->value ();
_nums = "";
// random numbers
if ( ui->random->isChecked () )
_generateNumbers (0, numbersCount, true);
// sequential numbers
else
int lower = ui->minimumSpinBox->value ();
int upper = ui->maximumSpinBox->value ();
_generateNumbers (lower, upper + 1, false);
ui->textEdit->setText (_nums);
void Generator::_generateNumbers( int low, int high, bool random )
QString separator = _getSeparator();
for ( qint32 i = low; i < high; ++i )
if ( random ) // random
_nums += QString::number ( _generateNumber () );
else // sequential
_nums += QString::number( i );
_nums += separator;
// output into multiple lines
if ( !_oneLineOutput () )
_nums += "n";
// get rid of the last separator char
if ( _oneLineOutput () && separator != "" ) _removeLastChar(_nums);
void Generator::saveToFile () QIODevice::Text) )
QMessageBox::information( this,
tr("Unable to open file"),
output.errorString() );
return;
QTextStream ts( &output );
ts << _nums.toUtf8 ();
output.close();
qint32 Generator::_generateNumber()
std::random_device rd;
std::default_random_engine eng(rd());
std::uniform_int_distribution< qint32 > distr( ui->minimumSpinBox->value (),
ui->maximumSpinBox->value () );
return distr(eng);
QString Generator::_getSeparator()
auto separator = ui->separator->currentText();
if ( separator == "(space)" ) return " ";
if ( separator == "(nothing)" ) return "";
return separator;
void Generator::setMinValue( int newValue )
auto maxValue = ui->maximumSpinBox->value ();
if ( newValue > maxValue ) ui->minimumSpinBox->setValue ( maxValue );
void Generator::setMaxValue ( int newValue )
auto minValue = ui->minimumSpinBox->value ();
if ( newValue < minValue ) ui->maximumSpinBox->setValue (minValue);
void Generator::clear ()
ui->textEdit->clear ();
void Generator::_removeLastChar( QString &string )
string.remove ( string.size () - 1, 1 );
bool Generator::_correctInputParameters()
return ui->minimumSpinBox->value () <= ui->maximumSpinBox->value ();
bool Generator::_oneLineOutput()
return ui->oneLine->isChecked ();
Generator::~Generator()
delete ui;
c++ c++11 random gui qt
c++ c++11 random gui qt
New contributor
sliziky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
sliziky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 18 hours ago
TrebledJ
1707
1707
New contributor
sliziky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked yesterday
slizikysliziky
603
603
New contributor
sliziky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
sliziky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
sliziky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$begingroup$
If you've used Designer, then the UI file you've edited is part of the complete code for review.
$endgroup$
– Toby Speight
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks. I originally wanted to show also.uifile but it contains ~500 lines so I decided not to. Should I append the.uinow when there is already the answer?
$endgroup$
– sliziky
41 mins ago
$begingroup$
Now that you have a review, you shouldn't add additional code to be reviewed; my comment was intended as a recommendation for future questions.
$endgroup$
– Toby Speight
39 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you've used Designer, then the UI file you've edited is part of the complete code for review.
$endgroup$
– Toby Speight
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks. I originally wanted to show also.uifile but it contains ~500 lines so I decided not to. Should I append the.uinow when there is already the answer?
$endgroup$
– sliziky
41 mins ago
$begingroup$
Now that you have a review, you shouldn't add additional code to be reviewed; my comment was intended as a recommendation for future questions.
$endgroup$
– Toby Speight
39 mins ago
$begingroup$
If you've used Designer, then the UI file you've edited is part of the complete code for review.
$endgroup$
– Toby Speight
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
If you've used Designer, then the UI file you've edited is part of the complete code for review.
$endgroup$
– Toby Speight
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks. I originally wanted to show also
.ui file but it contains ~500 lines so I decided not to. Should I append the .ui now when there is already the answer?$endgroup$
– sliziky
41 mins ago
$begingroup$
Thanks. I originally wanted to show also
.ui file but it contains ~500 lines so I decided not to. Should I append the .ui now when there is already the answer?$endgroup$
– sliziky
41 mins ago
$begingroup$
Now that you have a review, you shouldn't add additional code to be reviewed; my comment was intended as a recommendation for future questions.
$endgroup$
– Toby Speight
39 mins ago
$begingroup$
Now that you have a review, you shouldn't add additional code to be reviewed; my comment was intended as a recommendation for future questions.
$endgroup$
– Toby Speight
39 mins ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Seems like you've made a lot of improvements since your previous post! Let's get into the review!
1. General Overview
a. Use the on_<objectName>_<signal> Naming Scheme for Slots
This naming scheme tells the moc to automatically connect a slot with the corresponding <signal> of <objectName> from the UI. We then don't need to call connect(...), saving us a few lines of code.
If we take a look at the clearButton UI object, we can get this auto-connect behaviour by renaming the clear method to on_clearButton_clicked. The implementation doesn't change, only the symbol.
This process of pinpointing the correct slot name is automated from Design mode. First, right-click the object itself or the listing on the object-class tree. Then select the signal to connect and the slot to go to. Qt will automatically generate the on_clearButton_clicked slot in the header and source files (if it doesn't exist yet).

Right-click on your Clear button to bring up the context menu and select Go to slot...

Choose the clicked() signal and click OK.
Now you no longer need manually connect with connect(...). You can apply this to generateButton, clearButton, saveButton, minimumSpinBox, and maximumSpinBox. Yay, 5 less lines of code! 5 less worries!
(To be clear, static_cast<void (QSpinBox::*)(int)> isn't needed for minimumSpinBox, and maximumSpinBox as the correct overload can be automatically deduced.)
Also note that this naming scheme doesn't have to be used for every slot – it is primarily used for those slots which have a corresponding signal from the UI.
b. Consistency in Order of Methods in Header and Source Files
In your header file, the first four function-like declarations are
public:
explicit Generator(QWidget *parent = nullptr);
~Generator();
public slots:
void generateNumber();
void clear();
However, in your source file, the definition for the destructor comes last. This harms readability. Most readers may be expecting the same ordering of methods in both header and source files. Does this mean the header file should conform to the ordering of the source file? Something like below perhaps?
public:
explicit Generator(QWidget *parent = nullptr);
public slots:
void generateNumber();
void clear();
public:
~Generator();
Nawww, the source file should conform to the header file. Please, please, please; if you declare the destructor right after the constructor, define the destructor right after the constructor.
Generator::Generator(QWidget *parent)
: QMainWindow(parent)
, ui(new Ui::Generator)
ui->setupUi(this);
connect(ui->generateButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::generateNumber);
connect(ui->clearButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::clear);
connect(ui->saveButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::saveToFile);
connect(ui->exitButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &QApplication::exit);
connect(ui->minimumSpinBox, static_cast<void (QSpinBox::*)(int)>(&QSpinBox::valueChanged), this, &Generator::setMinValue);
connect(ui->maximumSpinBox, static_cast<void (QSpinBox::*)(int)>(&QSpinBox::valueChanged), this, &Generator::setMaxValue);
Generator::~Generator()
delete ui;
// other methods
// ...
c. Naming
i. _generateNumbers(int ?, int ?, bool random)
A minor issue. You have
void _generateNumbers( int from, int to, bool random );
in your header file but
void Generator::_generateNumbers( int low, int high, bool random ) {
in your source code. Choose either from/to or low/high, but not both.
ii. _correctInputParameters and oneLineOutput
For methods that return bool (also known as predicates), consider starting the method with is or has.
bool _hasCorrectInputParameters();
bool _isOneLineOutput();
Helps with readability. We don't need any special guesswork to infer that these will return bool.
2. Logic
The logic and program flow seems a tad messy, let's try cleaning it up!
a. clear()
What should this clear? Only the text-edit? I'd clear _nums as well.
void Generator::clear()
ui->textEdit->clear();
_nums.clear();
The last thing we want is to have the clear method clear only the gui and leave the variable sitting. Clear everything it all at once! Doing so allows us to pinpoint bugs easier – we don't have to spend 30 minutes digging through the entire code to find a lone _nums = "" placed wrongly.
b. generateNumber and _generateNumbers and _generateNumber
First off, these methods could do with better naming. As soon as I type generate, the IDE completer will show these three methods and it all suddenly becomes ambiguous. Be specific with what each method does.
_generateNumberonly generates random numbers, so change it to_generateRandomNumber.generateNumberhandles the button click, so follow the first section of this answer and change it toon_generateButton_clicked._generateNumbersis a fine name as it is.
Down to the logic. It doesn't really make sense to retrieve values of minimumSpinBox and maximumSpinBox in two places (one, in generateNumber, under the else branch; and two, in _generateNumber). Retrieve it once, then pass it accordingly. By the same principle, since only the random option needs int numbersCount = ui->numbers->value();, this should be placed in _generateNumbers instead.
void Generator::generateNumber()
clear();
// _nums = ""; // moved to clear(); same as _nums.clear()
int low = ui->minimumSpinBox->value(); // retrieve values from spinboxes ONCE
int high = ui->maximumSpinBox->value();
_generateNumbers(low, high+1, ui->random->isChecked()); // universal, no need for if-else
ui->textEdit->setText(_nums);
This also means changing _generateNumber to accept parameters so that we can later pass the low and high in generateNumber:
qint32 Generator::_generateNumber(int low, int high)
std::random_device rd;
std::default_random_engine eng(rd());
std::uniform_int_distribution<qint32> distr(low, high);
return distr(eng);
Currently, _generateNumbers serves two purposes: generating random numbers and generating sequential numbers. However, the arguments used are for completely different purposes, which is... meh... until their names contradict with their purpose which merits another meh. This seems like a big red sign to me:
if ( ui->random->isChecked () )
_generateNumbers (0, numbersCount, true); // low = 0, high = numbersCount ?
Does this use case not imply that the generated numbers should be between 0 and numbersCount? Apparently not... Apparently, low and high in that context means to generate high – low number of values.
Since the purposes and use cases are different, it only makes sense to have different implementations, so branch your if-else well ahead of the for-loop(s).
void Generator::_generateNumbers( int low, int high, bool random )
QString separator = _getSeparator();
if (random)
int numbersCount = ui->numbers->value();
// generate random numbers between low and high
// for (int i = 0; i < numbersCount; i++)
// ...
else
// generate random numbers between low and high
// ...
// get rid of the last separator char
if ( _oneLineOutput () && separator != "" ) _removeLastChar(_nums);
3. UI
On the UI side, I'd consider removing some borders – they do get in the way, especially the ones around Generate Numbers and the ones around your four buttons.
You should also consider disabling the How many numbers spinbox if the selected number pattern is Sequential as the two are mutually exclusive options.
But then, you could also consider the case where the user selects Sequential and provides a from-value and how-many-numbers-value but doesn't provide a to-value. Sounds like you could make this a third Numbers option: Sequential-n.
It's unfortunate that we don't get the .ui to play around with, but nonetheless, it looks stunning and functional from afar. :-)
New contributor
TrebledJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Welcome to Code Review! Nice job, first post or not.
$endgroup$
– greybeard
19 hours ago
$begingroup$
I realised I missed out a bunch of stuff on my first read. Had to read the code a third time to actually see a large proportion of the inherent problems. :P
$endgroup$
– TrebledJ
19 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
sliziky is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217431%2fqt-number-generator-v2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Seems like you've made a lot of improvements since your previous post! Let's get into the review!
1. General Overview
a. Use the on_<objectName>_<signal> Naming Scheme for Slots
This naming scheme tells the moc to automatically connect a slot with the corresponding <signal> of <objectName> from the UI. We then don't need to call connect(...), saving us a few lines of code.
If we take a look at the clearButton UI object, we can get this auto-connect behaviour by renaming the clear method to on_clearButton_clicked. The implementation doesn't change, only the symbol.
This process of pinpointing the correct slot name is automated from Design mode. First, right-click the object itself or the listing on the object-class tree. Then select the signal to connect and the slot to go to. Qt will automatically generate the on_clearButton_clicked slot in the header and source files (if it doesn't exist yet).

Right-click on your Clear button to bring up the context menu and select Go to slot...

Choose the clicked() signal and click OK.
Now you no longer need manually connect with connect(...). You can apply this to generateButton, clearButton, saveButton, minimumSpinBox, and maximumSpinBox. Yay, 5 less lines of code! 5 less worries!
(To be clear, static_cast<void (QSpinBox::*)(int)> isn't needed for minimumSpinBox, and maximumSpinBox as the correct overload can be automatically deduced.)
Also note that this naming scheme doesn't have to be used for every slot – it is primarily used for those slots which have a corresponding signal from the UI.
b. Consistency in Order of Methods in Header and Source Files
In your header file, the first four function-like declarations are
public:
explicit Generator(QWidget *parent = nullptr);
~Generator();
public slots:
void generateNumber();
void clear();
However, in your source file, the definition for the destructor comes last. This harms readability. Most readers may be expecting the same ordering of methods in both header and source files. Does this mean the header file should conform to the ordering of the source file? Something like below perhaps?
public:
explicit Generator(QWidget *parent = nullptr);
public slots:
void generateNumber();
void clear();
public:
~Generator();
Nawww, the source file should conform to the header file. Please, please, please; if you declare the destructor right after the constructor, define the destructor right after the constructor.
Generator::Generator(QWidget *parent)
: QMainWindow(parent)
, ui(new Ui::Generator)
ui->setupUi(this);
connect(ui->generateButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::generateNumber);
connect(ui->clearButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::clear);
connect(ui->saveButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::saveToFile);
connect(ui->exitButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &QApplication::exit);
connect(ui->minimumSpinBox, static_cast<void (QSpinBox::*)(int)>(&QSpinBox::valueChanged), this, &Generator::setMinValue);
connect(ui->maximumSpinBox, static_cast<void (QSpinBox::*)(int)>(&QSpinBox::valueChanged), this, &Generator::setMaxValue);
Generator::~Generator()
delete ui;
// other methods
// ...
c. Naming
i. _generateNumbers(int ?, int ?, bool random)
A minor issue. You have
void _generateNumbers( int from, int to, bool random );
in your header file but
void Generator::_generateNumbers( int low, int high, bool random ) {
in your source code. Choose either from/to or low/high, but not both.
ii. _correctInputParameters and oneLineOutput
For methods that return bool (also known as predicates), consider starting the method with is or has.
bool _hasCorrectInputParameters();
bool _isOneLineOutput();
Helps with readability. We don't need any special guesswork to infer that these will return bool.
2. Logic
The logic and program flow seems a tad messy, let's try cleaning it up!
a. clear()
What should this clear? Only the text-edit? I'd clear _nums as well.
void Generator::clear()
ui->textEdit->clear();
_nums.clear();
The last thing we want is to have the clear method clear only the gui and leave the variable sitting. Clear everything it all at once! Doing so allows us to pinpoint bugs easier – we don't have to spend 30 minutes digging through the entire code to find a lone _nums = "" placed wrongly.
b. generateNumber and _generateNumbers and _generateNumber
First off, these methods could do with better naming. As soon as I type generate, the IDE completer will show these three methods and it all suddenly becomes ambiguous. Be specific with what each method does.
_generateNumberonly generates random numbers, so change it to_generateRandomNumber.generateNumberhandles the button click, so follow the first section of this answer and change it toon_generateButton_clicked._generateNumbersis a fine name as it is.
Down to the logic. It doesn't really make sense to retrieve values of minimumSpinBox and maximumSpinBox in two places (one, in generateNumber, under the else branch; and two, in _generateNumber). Retrieve it once, then pass it accordingly. By the same principle, since only the random option needs int numbersCount = ui->numbers->value();, this should be placed in _generateNumbers instead.
void Generator::generateNumber()
clear();
// _nums = ""; // moved to clear(); same as _nums.clear()
int low = ui->minimumSpinBox->value(); // retrieve values from spinboxes ONCE
int high = ui->maximumSpinBox->value();
_generateNumbers(low, high+1, ui->random->isChecked()); // universal, no need for if-else
ui->textEdit->setText(_nums);
This also means changing _generateNumber to accept parameters so that we can later pass the low and high in generateNumber:
qint32 Generator::_generateNumber(int low, int high)
std::random_device rd;
std::default_random_engine eng(rd());
std::uniform_int_distribution<qint32> distr(low, high);
return distr(eng);
Currently, _generateNumbers serves two purposes: generating random numbers and generating sequential numbers. However, the arguments used are for completely different purposes, which is... meh... until their names contradict with their purpose which merits another meh. This seems like a big red sign to me:
if ( ui->random->isChecked () )
_generateNumbers (0, numbersCount, true); // low = 0, high = numbersCount ?
Does this use case not imply that the generated numbers should be between 0 and numbersCount? Apparently not... Apparently, low and high in that context means to generate high – low number of values.
Since the purposes and use cases are different, it only makes sense to have different implementations, so branch your if-else well ahead of the for-loop(s).
void Generator::_generateNumbers( int low, int high, bool random )
QString separator = _getSeparator();
if (random)
int numbersCount = ui->numbers->value();
// generate random numbers between low and high
// for (int i = 0; i < numbersCount; i++)
// ...
else
// generate random numbers between low and high
// ...
// get rid of the last separator char
if ( _oneLineOutput () && separator != "" ) _removeLastChar(_nums);
3. UI
On the UI side, I'd consider removing some borders – they do get in the way, especially the ones around Generate Numbers and the ones around your four buttons.
You should also consider disabling the How many numbers spinbox if the selected number pattern is Sequential as the two are mutually exclusive options.
But then, you could also consider the case where the user selects Sequential and provides a from-value and how-many-numbers-value but doesn't provide a to-value. Sounds like you could make this a third Numbers option: Sequential-n.
It's unfortunate that we don't get the .ui to play around with, but nonetheless, it looks stunning and functional from afar. :-)
New contributor
TrebledJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Welcome to Code Review! Nice job, first post or not.
$endgroup$
– greybeard
19 hours ago
$begingroup$
I realised I missed out a bunch of stuff on my first read. Had to read the code a third time to actually see a large proportion of the inherent problems. :P
$endgroup$
– TrebledJ
19 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Seems like you've made a lot of improvements since your previous post! Let's get into the review!
1. General Overview
a. Use the on_<objectName>_<signal> Naming Scheme for Slots
This naming scheme tells the moc to automatically connect a slot with the corresponding <signal> of <objectName> from the UI. We then don't need to call connect(...), saving us a few lines of code.
If we take a look at the clearButton UI object, we can get this auto-connect behaviour by renaming the clear method to on_clearButton_clicked. The implementation doesn't change, only the symbol.
This process of pinpointing the correct slot name is automated from Design mode. First, right-click the object itself or the listing on the object-class tree. Then select the signal to connect and the slot to go to. Qt will automatically generate the on_clearButton_clicked slot in the header and source files (if it doesn't exist yet).

Right-click on your Clear button to bring up the context menu and select Go to slot...

Choose the clicked() signal and click OK.
Now you no longer need manually connect with connect(...). You can apply this to generateButton, clearButton, saveButton, minimumSpinBox, and maximumSpinBox. Yay, 5 less lines of code! 5 less worries!
(To be clear, static_cast<void (QSpinBox::*)(int)> isn't needed for minimumSpinBox, and maximumSpinBox as the correct overload can be automatically deduced.)
Also note that this naming scheme doesn't have to be used for every slot – it is primarily used for those slots which have a corresponding signal from the UI.
b. Consistency in Order of Methods in Header and Source Files
In your header file, the first four function-like declarations are
public:
explicit Generator(QWidget *parent = nullptr);
~Generator();
public slots:
void generateNumber();
void clear();
However, in your source file, the definition for the destructor comes last. This harms readability. Most readers may be expecting the same ordering of methods in both header and source files. Does this mean the header file should conform to the ordering of the source file? Something like below perhaps?
public:
explicit Generator(QWidget *parent = nullptr);
public slots:
void generateNumber();
void clear();
public:
~Generator();
Nawww, the source file should conform to the header file. Please, please, please; if you declare the destructor right after the constructor, define the destructor right after the constructor.
Generator::Generator(QWidget *parent)
: QMainWindow(parent)
, ui(new Ui::Generator)
ui->setupUi(this);
connect(ui->generateButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::generateNumber);
connect(ui->clearButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::clear);
connect(ui->saveButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::saveToFile);
connect(ui->exitButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &QApplication::exit);
connect(ui->minimumSpinBox, static_cast<void (QSpinBox::*)(int)>(&QSpinBox::valueChanged), this, &Generator::setMinValue);
connect(ui->maximumSpinBox, static_cast<void (QSpinBox::*)(int)>(&QSpinBox::valueChanged), this, &Generator::setMaxValue);
Generator::~Generator()
delete ui;
// other methods
// ...
c. Naming
i. _generateNumbers(int ?, int ?, bool random)
A minor issue. You have
void _generateNumbers( int from, int to, bool random );
in your header file but
void Generator::_generateNumbers( int low, int high, bool random ) {
in your source code. Choose either from/to or low/high, but not both.
ii. _correctInputParameters and oneLineOutput
For methods that return bool (also known as predicates), consider starting the method with is or has.
bool _hasCorrectInputParameters();
bool _isOneLineOutput();
Helps with readability. We don't need any special guesswork to infer that these will return bool.
2. Logic
The logic and program flow seems a tad messy, let's try cleaning it up!
a. clear()
What should this clear? Only the text-edit? I'd clear _nums as well.
void Generator::clear()
ui->textEdit->clear();
_nums.clear();
The last thing we want is to have the clear method clear only the gui and leave the variable sitting. Clear everything it all at once! Doing so allows us to pinpoint bugs easier – we don't have to spend 30 minutes digging through the entire code to find a lone _nums = "" placed wrongly.
b. generateNumber and _generateNumbers and _generateNumber
First off, these methods could do with better naming. As soon as I type generate, the IDE completer will show these three methods and it all suddenly becomes ambiguous. Be specific with what each method does.
_generateNumberonly generates random numbers, so change it to_generateRandomNumber.generateNumberhandles the button click, so follow the first section of this answer and change it toon_generateButton_clicked._generateNumbersis a fine name as it is.
Down to the logic. It doesn't really make sense to retrieve values of minimumSpinBox and maximumSpinBox in two places (one, in generateNumber, under the else branch; and two, in _generateNumber). Retrieve it once, then pass it accordingly. By the same principle, since only the random option needs int numbersCount = ui->numbers->value();, this should be placed in _generateNumbers instead.
void Generator::generateNumber()
clear();
// _nums = ""; // moved to clear(); same as _nums.clear()
int low = ui->minimumSpinBox->value(); // retrieve values from spinboxes ONCE
int high = ui->maximumSpinBox->value();
_generateNumbers(low, high+1, ui->random->isChecked()); // universal, no need for if-else
ui->textEdit->setText(_nums);
This also means changing _generateNumber to accept parameters so that we can later pass the low and high in generateNumber:
qint32 Generator::_generateNumber(int low, int high)
std::random_device rd;
std::default_random_engine eng(rd());
std::uniform_int_distribution<qint32> distr(low, high);
return distr(eng);
Currently, _generateNumbers serves two purposes: generating random numbers and generating sequential numbers. However, the arguments used are for completely different purposes, which is... meh... until their names contradict with their purpose which merits another meh. This seems like a big red sign to me:
if ( ui->random->isChecked () )
_generateNumbers (0, numbersCount, true); // low = 0, high = numbersCount ?
Does this use case not imply that the generated numbers should be between 0 and numbersCount? Apparently not... Apparently, low and high in that context means to generate high – low number of values.
Since the purposes and use cases are different, it only makes sense to have different implementations, so branch your if-else well ahead of the for-loop(s).
void Generator::_generateNumbers( int low, int high, bool random )
QString separator = _getSeparator();
if (random)
int numbersCount = ui->numbers->value();
// generate random numbers between low and high
// for (int i = 0; i < numbersCount; i++)
// ...
else
// generate random numbers between low and high
// ...
// get rid of the last separator char
if ( _oneLineOutput () && separator != "" ) _removeLastChar(_nums);
3. UI
On the UI side, I'd consider removing some borders – they do get in the way, especially the ones around Generate Numbers and the ones around your four buttons.
You should also consider disabling the How many numbers spinbox if the selected number pattern is Sequential as the two are mutually exclusive options.
But then, you could also consider the case where the user selects Sequential and provides a from-value and how-many-numbers-value but doesn't provide a to-value. Sounds like you could make this a third Numbers option: Sequential-n.
It's unfortunate that we don't get the .ui to play around with, but nonetheless, it looks stunning and functional from afar. :-)
New contributor
TrebledJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Welcome to Code Review! Nice job, first post or not.
$endgroup$
– greybeard
19 hours ago
$begingroup$
I realised I missed out a bunch of stuff on my first read. Had to read the code a third time to actually see a large proportion of the inherent problems. :P
$endgroup$
– TrebledJ
19 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Seems like you've made a lot of improvements since your previous post! Let's get into the review!
1. General Overview
a. Use the on_<objectName>_<signal> Naming Scheme for Slots
This naming scheme tells the moc to automatically connect a slot with the corresponding <signal> of <objectName> from the UI. We then don't need to call connect(...), saving us a few lines of code.
If we take a look at the clearButton UI object, we can get this auto-connect behaviour by renaming the clear method to on_clearButton_clicked. The implementation doesn't change, only the symbol.
This process of pinpointing the correct slot name is automated from Design mode. First, right-click the object itself or the listing on the object-class tree. Then select the signal to connect and the slot to go to. Qt will automatically generate the on_clearButton_clicked slot in the header and source files (if it doesn't exist yet).

Right-click on your Clear button to bring up the context menu and select Go to slot...

Choose the clicked() signal and click OK.
Now you no longer need manually connect with connect(...). You can apply this to generateButton, clearButton, saveButton, minimumSpinBox, and maximumSpinBox. Yay, 5 less lines of code! 5 less worries!
(To be clear, static_cast<void (QSpinBox::*)(int)> isn't needed for minimumSpinBox, and maximumSpinBox as the correct overload can be automatically deduced.)
Also note that this naming scheme doesn't have to be used for every slot – it is primarily used for those slots which have a corresponding signal from the UI.
b. Consistency in Order of Methods in Header and Source Files
In your header file, the first four function-like declarations are
public:
explicit Generator(QWidget *parent = nullptr);
~Generator();
public slots:
void generateNumber();
void clear();
However, in your source file, the definition for the destructor comes last. This harms readability. Most readers may be expecting the same ordering of methods in both header and source files. Does this mean the header file should conform to the ordering of the source file? Something like below perhaps?
public:
explicit Generator(QWidget *parent = nullptr);
public slots:
void generateNumber();
void clear();
public:
~Generator();
Nawww, the source file should conform to the header file. Please, please, please; if you declare the destructor right after the constructor, define the destructor right after the constructor.
Generator::Generator(QWidget *parent)
: QMainWindow(parent)
, ui(new Ui::Generator)
ui->setupUi(this);
connect(ui->generateButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::generateNumber);
connect(ui->clearButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::clear);
connect(ui->saveButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::saveToFile);
connect(ui->exitButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &QApplication::exit);
connect(ui->minimumSpinBox, static_cast<void (QSpinBox::*)(int)>(&QSpinBox::valueChanged), this, &Generator::setMinValue);
connect(ui->maximumSpinBox, static_cast<void (QSpinBox::*)(int)>(&QSpinBox::valueChanged), this, &Generator::setMaxValue);
Generator::~Generator()
delete ui;
// other methods
// ...
c. Naming
i. _generateNumbers(int ?, int ?, bool random)
A minor issue. You have
void _generateNumbers( int from, int to, bool random );
in your header file but
void Generator::_generateNumbers( int low, int high, bool random ) {
in your source code. Choose either from/to or low/high, but not both.
ii. _correctInputParameters and oneLineOutput
For methods that return bool (also known as predicates), consider starting the method with is or has.
bool _hasCorrectInputParameters();
bool _isOneLineOutput();
Helps with readability. We don't need any special guesswork to infer that these will return bool.
2. Logic
The logic and program flow seems a tad messy, let's try cleaning it up!
a. clear()
What should this clear? Only the text-edit? I'd clear _nums as well.
void Generator::clear()
ui->textEdit->clear();
_nums.clear();
The last thing we want is to have the clear method clear only the gui and leave the variable sitting. Clear everything it all at once! Doing so allows us to pinpoint bugs easier – we don't have to spend 30 minutes digging through the entire code to find a lone _nums = "" placed wrongly.
b. generateNumber and _generateNumbers and _generateNumber
First off, these methods could do with better naming. As soon as I type generate, the IDE completer will show these three methods and it all suddenly becomes ambiguous. Be specific with what each method does.
_generateNumberonly generates random numbers, so change it to_generateRandomNumber.generateNumberhandles the button click, so follow the first section of this answer and change it toon_generateButton_clicked._generateNumbersis a fine name as it is.
Down to the logic. It doesn't really make sense to retrieve values of minimumSpinBox and maximumSpinBox in two places (one, in generateNumber, under the else branch; and two, in _generateNumber). Retrieve it once, then pass it accordingly. By the same principle, since only the random option needs int numbersCount = ui->numbers->value();, this should be placed in _generateNumbers instead.
void Generator::generateNumber()
clear();
// _nums = ""; // moved to clear(); same as _nums.clear()
int low = ui->minimumSpinBox->value(); // retrieve values from spinboxes ONCE
int high = ui->maximumSpinBox->value();
_generateNumbers(low, high+1, ui->random->isChecked()); // universal, no need for if-else
ui->textEdit->setText(_nums);
This also means changing _generateNumber to accept parameters so that we can later pass the low and high in generateNumber:
qint32 Generator::_generateNumber(int low, int high)
std::random_device rd;
std::default_random_engine eng(rd());
std::uniform_int_distribution<qint32> distr(low, high);
return distr(eng);
Currently, _generateNumbers serves two purposes: generating random numbers and generating sequential numbers. However, the arguments used are for completely different purposes, which is... meh... until their names contradict with their purpose which merits another meh. This seems like a big red sign to me:
if ( ui->random->isChecked () )
_generateNumbers (0, numbersCount, true); // low = 0, high = numbersCount ?
Does this use case not imply that the generated numbers should be between 0 and numbersCount? Apparently not... Apparently, low and high in that context means to generate high – low number of values.
Since the purposes and use cases are different, it only makes sense to have different implementations, so branch your if-else well ahead of the for-loop(s).
void Generator::_generateNumbers( int low, int high, bool random )
QString separator = _getSeparator();
if (random)
int numbersCount = ui->numbers->value();
// generate random numbers between low and high
// for (int i = 0; i < numbersCount; i++)
// ...
else
// generate random numbers between low and high
// ...
// get rid of the last separator char
if ( _oneLineOutput () && separator != "" ) _removeLastChar(_nums);
3. UI
On the UI side, I'd consider removing some borders – they do get in the way, especially the ones around Generate Numbers and the ones around your four buttons.
You should also consider disabling the How many numbers spinbox if the selected number pattern is Sequential as the two are mutually exclusive options.
But then, you could also consider the case where the user selects Sequential and provides a from-value and how-many-numbers-value but doesn't provide a to-value. Sounds like you could make this a third Numbers option: Sequential-n.
It's unfortunate that we don't get the .ui to play around with, but nonetheless, it looks stunning and functional from afar. :-)
New contributor
TrebledJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Seems like you've made a lot of improvements since your previous post! Let's get into the review!
1. General Overview
a. Use the on_<objectName>_<signal> Naming Scheme for Slots
This naming scheme tells the moc to automatically connect a slot with the corresponding <signal> of <objectName> from the UI. We then don't need to call connect(...), saving us a few lines of code.
If we take a look at the clearButton UI object, we can get this auto-connect behaviour by renaming the clear method to on_clearButton_clicked. The implementation doesn't change, only the symbol.
This process of pinpointing the correct slot name is automated from Design mode. First, right-click the object itself or the listing on the object-class tree. Then select the signal to connect and the slot to go to. Qt will automatically generate the on_clearButton_clicked slot in the header and source files (if it doesn't exist yet).

Right-click on your Clear button to bring up the context menu and select Go to slot...

Choose the clicked() signal and click OK.
Now you no longer need manually connect with connect(...). You can apply this to generateButton, clearButton, saveButton, minimumSpinBox, and maximumSpinBox. Yay, 5 less lines of code! 5 less worries!
(To be clear, static_cast<void (QSpinBox::*)(int)> isn't needed for minimumSpinBox, and maximumSpinBox as the correct overload can be automatically deduced.)
Also note that this naming scheme doesn't have to be used for every slot – it is primarily used for those slots which have a corresponding signal from the UI.
b. Consistency in Order of Methods in Header and Source Files
In your header file, the first four function-like declarations are
public:
explicit Generator(QWidget *parent = nullptr);
~Generator();
public slots:
void generateNumber();
void clear();
However, in your source file, the definition for the destructor comes last. This harms readability. Most readers may be expecting the same ordering of methods in both header and source files. Does this mean the header file should conform to the ordering of the source file? Something like below perhaps?
public:
explicit Generator(QWidget *parent = nullptr);
public slots:
void generateNumber();
void clear();
public:
~Generator();
Nawww, the source file should conform to the header file. Please, please, please; if you declare the destructor right after the constructor, define the destructor right after the constructor.
Generator::Generator(QWidget *parent)
: QMainWindow(parent)
, ui(new Ui::Generator)
ui->setupUi(this);
connect(ui->generateButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::generateNumber);
connect(ui->clearButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::clear);
connect(ui->saveButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &Generator::saveToFile);
connect(ui->exitButton, &QPushButton::clicked, this, &QApplication::exit);
connect(ui->minimumSpinBox, static_cast<void (QSpinBox::*)(int)>(&QSpinBox::valueChanged), this, &Generator::setMinValue);
connect(ui->maximumSpinBox, static_cast<void (QSpinBox::*)(int)>(&QSpinBox::valueChanged), this, &Generator::setMaxValue);
Generator::~Generator()
delete ui;
// other methods
// ...
c. Naming
i. _generateNumbers(int ?, int ?, bool random)
A minor issue. You have
void _generateNumbers( int from, int to, bool random );
in your header file but
void Generator::_generateNumbers( int low, int high, bool random ) {
in your source code. Choose either from/to or low/high, but not both.
ii. _correctInputParameters and oneLineOutput
For methods that return bool (also known as predicates), consider starting the method with is or has.
bool _hasCorrectInputParameters();
bool _isOneLineOutput();
Helps with readability. We don't need any special guesswork to infer that these will return bool.
2. Logic
The logic and program flow seems a tad messy, let's try cleaning it up!
a. clear()
What should this clear? Only the text-edit? I'd clear _nums as well.
void Generator::clear()
ui->textEdit->clear();
_nums.clear();
The last thing we want is to have the clear method clear only the gui and leave the variable sitting. Clear everything it all at once! Doing so allows us to pinpoint bugs easier – we don't have to spend 30 minutes digging through the entire code to find a lone _nums = "" placed wrongly.
b. generateNumber and _generateNumbers and _generateNumber
First off, these methods could do with better naming. As soon as I type generate, the IDE completer will show these three methods and it all suddenly becomes ambiguous. Be specific with what each method does.
_generateNumberonly generates random numbers, so change it to_generateRandomNumber.generateNumberhandles the button click, so follow the first section of this answer and change it toon_generateButton_clicked._generateNumbersis a fine name as it is.
Down to the logic. It doesn't really make sense to retrieve values of minimumSpinBox and maximumSpinBox in two places (one, in generateNumber, under the else branch; and two, in _generateNumber). Retrieve it once, then pass it accordingly. By the same principle, since only the random option needs int numbersCount = ui->numbers->value();, this should be placed in _generateNumbers instead.
void Generator::generateNumber()
clear();
// _nums = ""; // moved to clear(); same as _nums.clear()
int low = ui->minimumSpinBox->value(); // retrieve values from spinboxes ONCE
int high = ui->maximumSpinBox->value();
_generateNumbers(low, high+1, ui->random->isChecked()); // universal, no need for if-else
ui->textEdit->setText(_nums);
This also means changing _generateNumber to accept parameters so that we can later pass the low and high in generateNumber:
qint32 Generator::_generateNumber(int low, int high)
std::random_device rd;
std::default_random_engine eng(rd());
std::uniform_int_distribution<qint32> distr(low, high);
return distr(eng);
Currently, _generateNumbers serves two purposes: generating random numbers and generating sequential numbers. However, the arguments used are for completely different purposes, which is... meh... until their names contradict with their purpose which merits another meh. This seems like a big red sign to me:
if ( ui->random->isChecked () )
_generateNumbers (0, numbersCount, true); // low = 0, high = numbersCount ?
Does this use case not imply that the generated numbers should be between 0 and numbersCount? Apparently not... Apparently, low and high in that context means to generate high – low number of values.
Since the purposes and use cases are different, it only makes sense to have different implementations, so branch your if-else well ahead of the for-loop(s).
void Generator::_generateNumbers( int low, int high, bool random )
QString separator = _getSeparator();
if (random)
int numbersCount = ui->numbers->value();
// generate random numbers between low and high
// for (int i = 0; i < numbersCount; i++)
// ...
else
// generate random numbers between low and high
// ...
// get rid of the last separator char
if ( _oneLineOutput () && separator != "" ) _removeLastChar(_nums);
3. UI
On the UI side, I'd consider removing some borders – they do get in the way, especially the ones around Generate Numbers and the ones around your four buttons.
You should also consider disabling the How many numbers spinbox if the selected number pattern is Sequential as the two are mutually exclusive options.
But then, you could also consider the case where the user selects Sequential and provides a from-value and how-many-numbers-value but doesn't provide a to-value. Sounds like you could make this a third Numbers option: Sequential-n.
It's unfortunate that we don't get the .ui to play around with, but nonetheless, it looks stunning and functional from afar. :-)
New contributor
TrebledJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 19 hours ago
New contributor
TrebledJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 20 hours ago
TrebledJTrebledJ
1707
1707
New contributor
TrebledJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
TrebledJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
TrebledJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
2
$begingroup$
Welcome to Code Review! Nice job, first post or not.
$endgroup$
– greybeard
19 hours ago
$begingroup$
I realised I missed out a bunch of stuff on my first read. Had to read the code a third time to actually see a large proportion of the inherent problems. :P
$endgroup$
– TrebledJ
19 hours ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Welcome to Code Review! Nice job, first post or not.
$endgroup$
– greybeard
19 hours ago
$begingroup$
I realised I missed out a bunch of stuff on my first read. Had to read the code a third time to actually see a large proportion of the inherent problems. :P
$endgroup$
– TrebledJ
19 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
Welcome to Code Review! Nice job, first post or not.
$endgroup$
– greybeard
19 hours ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to Code Review! Nice job, first post or not.
$endgroup$
– greybeard
19 hours ago
$begingroup$
I realised I missed out a bunch of stuff on my first read. Had to read the code a third time to actually see a large proportion of the inherent problems. :P
$endgroup$
– TrebledJ
19 hours ago
$begingroup$
I realised I missed out a bunch of stuff on my first read. Had to read the code a third time to actually see a large proportion of the inherent problems. :P
$endgroup$
– TrebledJ
19 hours ago
add a comment |
sliziky is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
sliziky is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
sliziky is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
sliziky is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217431%2fqt-number-generator-v2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
-c++, c++11, gui, qt, random
$begingroup$
If you've used Designer, then the UI file you've edited is part of the complete code for review.
$endgroup$
– Toby Speight
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks. I originally wanted to show also
.uifile but it contains ~500 lines so I decided not to. Should I append the.uinow when there is already the answer?$endgroup$
– sliziky
41 mins ago
$begingroup$
Now that you have a review, you shouldn't add additional code to be reviewed; my comment was intended as a recommendation for future questions.
$endgroup$
– Toby Speight
39 mins ago