Java 8 stream max() function argument type Comparator vs Comparable Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) The Ask Question Wizard is Live! Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience Should we burninate the [wrap] tag?Java 8 stream's .min() and .max(): why does this compile?How do I compare strings in Java?Comparing Java enum members: == or equals()?Best practice for compareTo() when argument must be typed of super classIs there a concise way to iterate over a stream with indices in Java 8?Custom thread pool in Java 8 parallel streamHow to Convert a Java 8 Stream to an Array?Convert Iterable to Stream using Java 8 JDKWhy are Java Streams once-off?How to sum a list of integers with java streams?Java Generics Clarification( Constraining T to a type, while using Comparable)
How does a Death Domain cleric's Touch of Death feature work with Touch-range spells delivered by familiars?
Why is there no army of Iron-Mans in the MCU?
Bonus calculation: Am I making a mountain out of a molehill?
Does accepting a pardon have any bearing on trying that person for the same crime in a sovereign jurisdiction?
Why is "Captain Marvel" translated as male in Portugal?
Stars Make Stars
When -s is used with third person singular. What's its use in this context?
Is it true that "carbohydrates are of no use for the basal metabolic need"?
Withdrew £2800, but only £2000 shows as withdrawn on online banking; what are my obligations?
List *all* the tuples!
Why aren't air breathing engines used as small first stages
Determinant is linear as a function of each of the rows of the matrix.
Is the address of a local variable a constexpr?
How to deal with a team lead who never gives me credit?
How widely used is the term Treppenwitz? Is it something that most Germans know?
Is the Standard Deduction better than Itemized when both are the same amount?
What is this single-engine low-wing propeller plane?
Is above average number of years spent on PhD considered a red flag in future academia or industry positions?
How to recreate this effect in Photoshop?
Why is "Consequences inflicted." not a sentence?
Right-skewed distribution with mean equals to mode?
What would be the ideal power source for a cybernetic eye?
What is the longest distance a 13th-level monk can jump while attacking on the same turn?
How to motivate offshore teams and trust them to deliver?
Java 8 stream max() function argument type Comparator vs Comparable
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
The Ask Question Wizard is Live!
Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience
Should we burninate the [wrap] tag?Java 8 stream's .min() and .max(): why does this compile?How do I compare strings in Java?Comparing Java enum members: == or equals()?Best practice for compareTo() when argument must be typed of super classIs there a concise way to iterate over a stream with indices in Java 8?Custom thread pool in Java 8 parallel streamHow to Convert a Java 8 Stream to an Array?Convert Iterable to Stream using Java 8 JDKWhy are Java Streams once-off?How to sum a list of integers with java streams?Java Generics Clarification( Constraining T to a type, while using Comparable)
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I wrote some simple code like below. This class works fine without any errors.
public class Test
public static void main(String[] args)
List<Integer> intList = IntStream.of(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10).boxed().collect(Collectors.toList());
int value = intList.stream().max(Integer::compareTo).get();
//int value = intList.stream().max(<Comparator<? super T> comparator type should pass here>).get();
System.out.println("value :"+value);
As the code comment shows the max()
method should pass an argument of type Comparator<? super Integer>
.
But Integer::compareTo
implements Comparable
interface - not Comparator
.
public final class Integer extends Number implements Comparable<Integer>
public int compareTo(Integer anotherInteger)
return compare(this.value, anotherInteger.value);
How can this work? The max()
method says it needs a Comparator
argument, but it works with Comparable
argument.
I know I have misunderstood something, but I do now know what. Can someone please explain?
java java-8 java-stream
add a comment |
I wrote some simple code like below. This class works fine without any errors.
public class Test
public static void main(String[] args)
List<Integer> intList = IntStream.of(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10).boxed().collect(Collectors.toList());
int value = intList.stream().max(Integer::compareTo).get();
//int value = intList.stream().max(<Comparator<? super T> comparator type should pass here>).get();
System.out.println("value :"+value);
As the code comment shows the max()
method should pass an argument of type Comparator<? super Integer>
.
But Integer::compareTo
implements Comparable
interface - not Comparator
.
public final class Integer extends Number implements Comparable<Integer>
public int compareTo(Integer anotherInteger)
return compare(this.value, anotherInteger.value);
How can this work? The max()
method says it needs a Comparator
argument, but it works with Comparable
argument.
I know I have misunderstood something, but I do now know what. Can someone please explain?
java java-8 java-stream
2
Integer::compareTo
does not return a Comparable - it is the short definition for: "Please compiler generate a matching implementation for the type that is needed (in this caseComparator
) and map the arguments to the specified function." In this case the function requires two "arguments" (this
and the one parameter ofcompareTo
) and the Comparator provides two arguments -> works.
– Robert
11 hours ago
4
""Please compiler, generate..." ... compilers always respond best to politeness and courtesy :-)
– scottb
11 hours ago
1
Related: stackoverflow.com/questions/22561614/…
– Oleksandr
7 hours ago
add a comment |
I wrote some simple code like below. This class works fine without any errors.
public class Test
public static void main(String[] args)
List<Integer> intList = IntStream.of(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10).boxed().collect(Collectors.toList());
int value = intList.stream().max(Integer::compareTo).get();
//int value = intList.stream().max(<Comparator<? super T> comparator type should pass here>).get();
System.out.println("value :"+value);
As the code comment shows the max()
method should pass an argument of type Comparator<? super Integer>
.
But Integer::compareTo
implements Comparable
interface - not Comparator
.
public final class Integer extends Number implements Comparable<Integer>
public int compareTo(Integer anotherInteger)
return compare(this.value, anotherInteger.value);
How can this work? The max()
method says it needs a Comparator
argument, but it works with Comparable
argument.
I know I have misunderstood something, but I do now know what. Can someone please explain?
java java-8 java-stream
I wrote some simple code like below. This class works fine without any errors.
public class Test
public static void main(String[] args)
List<Integer> intList = IntStream.of(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10).boxed().collect(Collectors.toList());
int value = intList.stream().max(Integer::compareTo).get();
//int value = intList.stream().max(<Comparator<? super T> comparator type should pass here>).get();
System.out.println("value :"+value);
As the code comment shows the max()
method should pass an argument of type Comparator<? super Integer>
.
But Integer::compareTo
implements Comparable
interface - not Comparator
.
public final class Integer extends Number implements Comparable<Integer>
public int compareTo(Integer anotherInteger)
return compare(this.value, anotherInteger.value);
How can this work? The max()
method says it needs a Comparator
argument, but it works with Comparable
argument.
I know I have misunderstood something, but I do now know what. Can someone please explain?
java java-8 java-stream
java java-8 java-stream
edited 10 hours ago
MyStackRunnethOver
1,007919
1,007919
asked 12 hours ago
ShalikaShalika
3931518
3931518
2
Integer::compareTo
does not return a Comparable - it is the short definition for: "Please compiler generate a matching implementation for the type that is needed (in this caseComparator
) and map the arguments to the specified function." In this case the function requires two "arguments" (this
and the one parameter ofcompareTo
) and the Comparator provides two arguments -> works.
– Robert
11 hours ago
4
""Please compiler, generate..." ... compilers always respond best to politeness and courtesy :-)
– scottb
11 hours ago
1
Related: stackoverflow.com/questions/22561614/…
– Oleksandr
7 hours ago
add a comment |
2
Integer::compareTo
does not return a Comparable - it is the short definition for: "Please compiler generate a matching implementation for the type that is needed (in this caseComparator
) and map the arguments to the specified function." In this case the function requires two "arguments" (this
and the one parameter ofcompareTo
) and the Comparator provides two arguments -> works.
– Robert
11 hours ago
4
""Please compiler, generate..." ... compilers always respond best to politeness and courtesy :-)
– scottb
11 hours ago
1
Related: stackoverflow.com/questions/22561614/…
– Oleksandr
7 hours ago
2
2
Integer::compareTo
does not return a Comparable - it is the short definition for: "Please compiler generate a matching implementation for the type that is needed (in this case Comparator
) and map the arguments to the specified function." In this case the function requires two "arguments" (this
and the one parameter of compareTo
) and the Comparator provides two arguments -> works.– Robert
11 hours ago
Integer::compareTo
does not return a Comparable - it is the short definition for: "Please compiler generate a matching implementation for the type that is needed (in this case Comparator
) and map the arguments to the specified function." In this case the function requires two "arguments" (this
and the one parameter of compareTo
) and the Comparator provides two arguments -> works.– Robert
11 hours ago
4
4
""Please compiler, generate..." ... compilers always respond best to politeness and courtesy :-)
– scottb
11 hours ago
""Please compiler, generate..." ... compilers always respond best to politeness and courtesy :-)
– scottb
11 hours ago
1
1
Related: stackoverflow.com/questions/22561614/…
– Oleksandr
7 hours ago
Related: stackoverflow.com/questions/22561614/…
– Oleksandr
7 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
int value = intList.stream().max(Integer::compareTo).get();
The above snippet of code is logically equivalent to the following:
int value = intList.stream().max((a, b) -> a.compareTo(b)).get();
Which is also logically equivalent to the following:
int value = intList.stream().max(new Comparator<Integer>()
@Override
public int compare(Integer a, Integer b)
return a.compareTo(b);
).get();
Comparator
is a functional interface and can be used as a lambda or method reference, which is why your code compiles and executes successfully.
I recommend reading Oracle's tutorial on Method References (they use an example where two objects are compared) as well as the Java Language Specification on §15.13. Method Reference Expressions to understand why this works.
8
Although it's absolutely correct, it doesn't answer "How can this work?"
– Andrew Tobilko
12 hours ago
add a comment |
I can relate to your confusion.
We've got a Comparator
's method which declares two parameters
int compare(T o1, T o2);
and we've got an Integer
's method which takes one parameter
int compareTo(Integer anotherInteger)
How on earth does Integer::compareTo
get resolved to a Comparator
instance?
When a method reference points to an instance method, the parser can look for methods with arity n-1
(n
is the expected number of parameters).
Here's an excerpt from the JLS on how applicable methods are identified. I will drop the first part about parsing the expression preceding the ::
token.
Second, given a targeted function type with
n
parameters, a set of potentially applicable methods is identified:
If the method reference expression has the form
ReferenceType :: [TypeArguments] Identifier
, then the potentially applicable methods are:
the member methods of the type to search that would be potentially applicable (§15.12.2.1) for a method invocation which names Identifier, has arity n, has type arguments TypeArguments, and appears in the same class as the method reference expression; plus
the member methods of the type to search that would be potentially applicable for a method invocation which names
Identifier
, has arity n-1, has type arguments TypeArguments, and appears in the same class as the method reference expression.
Two different arities,
n
andn-1
, are considered, to account for the possibility that this form refers to either a static method or an instance method.
...
A method reference expression of the form
ReferenceType :: [TypeArguments] Identifier
can be interpreted in different ways. IfIdentifier
refers to an instance method, then the implicit lambda expression has an extra parameter compared to ifIdentifier
refers to a static method.
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se12/html/jls-15.html#jls-15.13.1
If we were to write an implicit lambda expression from that method reference, the first (implicit) parameter would be an instance to call the method on, the second (explicit) parameter would be an argument to pass in the method.
(implicitParam, anotherInteger) -> implicitParam.compareTo(anotherInteger)
Note that a method reference differs from a lambda expression, even though the former can be easily transformed into the latter. A lambda expression needs to be desugared into a new method, while a method reference usually requires only loading a corresponding constant method handle.
add a comment |
Integer
implements Comparable
by overriding compareTo
.
That overriden compareTo
, however, can be used in a way that satisfies and implements the Comparator
interface.
In its usage here
int value = intList.stream().max(Integer::compareTo).get();
it's translated to something like
int value = intList.stream().max(new Comparator<Integer>()
@Override
public int compare(Integer o1, Integer o2)
return o1.compareTo(o2);
).get();
A method reference (or lambda expression) must satisfy the signature of the corresponding functional interface's single abstract method and, in this case (Comparator
), compareTo
does.
The idea is that max
expects a Comparator
and its compare
method expects two Integer
objects. Integer::compareTo
can satisfy those expectations because it also expects two Integer
objects. The first is its receiver (the instance on which the method is to be called) and the second is the argument. With the new Java 8 syntax, the compiler translates one style to the other.
(compareTo
also returns an int
as required by Comparator#compare
.)
how doesInteger::compareTo
satisfy the signature ofComparator#compare
?compareTo(Integer)
vscompare(Integer, Integer)
?
– Andrew Tobilko
8 hours ago
@AndrewTobilko Edited with an explanation.
– Savior
7 hours ago
Did I explain it incorrectly (downvote?)?
– Savior
7 hours ago
I didn’t downvote your answer, though I disagree with the part about the compiler translating something into something else
– Andrew Tobilko
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55694015%2fjava-8-stream-max-function-argument-type-comparator-vs-comparable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
int value = intList.stream().max(Integer::compareTo).get();
The above snippet of code is logically equivalent to the following:
int value = intList.stream().max((a, b) -> a.compareTo(b)).get();
Which is also logically equivalent to the following:
int value = intList.stream().max(new Comparator<Integer>()
@Override
public int compare(Integer a, Integer b)
return a.compareTo(b);
).get();
Comparator
is a functional interface and can be used as a lambda or method reference, which is why your code compiles and executes successfully.
I recommend reading Oracle's tutorial on Method References (they use an example where two objects are compared) as well as the Java Language Specification on §15.13. Method Reference Expressions to understand why this works.
8
Although it's absolutely correct, it doesn't answer "How can this work?"
– Andrew Tobilko
12 hours ago
add a comment |
int value = intList.stream().max(Integer::compareTo).get();
The above snippet of code is logically equivalent to the following:
int value = intList.stream().max((a, b) -> a.compareTo(b)).get();
Which is also logically equivalent to the following:
int value = intList.stream().max(new Comparator<Integer>()
@Override
public int compare(Integer a, Integer b)
return a.compareTo(b);
).get();
Comparator
is a functional interface and can be used as a lambda or method reference, which is why your code compiles and executes successfully.
I recommend reading Oracle's tutorial on Method References (they use an example where two objects are compared) as well as the Java Language Specification on §15.13. Method Reference Expressions to understand why this works.
8
Although it's absolutely correct, it doesn't answer "How can this work?"
– Andrew Tobilko
12 hours ago
add a comment |
int value = intList.stream().max(Integer::compareTo).get();
The above snippet of code is logically equivalent to the following:
int value = intList.stream().max((a, b) -> a.compareTo(b)).get();
Which is also logically equivalent to the following:
int value = intList.stream().max(new Comparator<Integer>()
@Override
public int compare(Integer a, Integer b)
return a.compareTo(b);
).get();
Comparator
is a functional interface and can be used as a lambda or method reference, which is why your code compiles and executes successfully.
I recommend reading Oracle's tutorial on Method References (they use an example where two objects are compared) as well as the Java Language Specification on §15.13. Method Reference Expressions to understand why this works.
int value = intList.stream().max(Integer::compareTo).get();
The above snippet of code is logically equivalent to the following:
int value = intList.stream().max((a, b) -> a.compareTo(b)).get();
Which is also logically equivalent to the following:
int value = intList.stream().max(new Comparator<Integer>()
@Override
public int compare(Integer a, Integer b)
return a.compareTo(b);
).get();
Comparator
is a functional interface and can be used as a lambda or method reference, which is why your code compiles and executes successfully.
I recommend reading Oracle's tutorial on Method References (they use an example where two objects are compared) as well as the Java Language Specification on §15.13. Method Reference Expressions to understand why this works.
edited 12 hours ago
answered 12 hours ago
Jacob G.Jacob G.
16.8k52466
16.8k52466
8
Although it's absolutely correct, it doesn't answer "How can this work?"
– Andrew Tobilko
12 hours ago
add a comment |
8
Although it's absolutely correct, it doesn't answer "How can this work?"
– Andrew Tobilko
12 hours ago
8
8
Although it's absolutely correct, it doesn't answer "How can this work?"
– Andrew Tobilko
12 hours ago
Although it's absolutely correct, it doesn't answer "How can this work?"
– Andrew Tobilko
12 hours ago
add a comment |
I can relate to your confusion.
We've got a Comparator
's method which declares two parameters
int compare(T o1, T o2);
and we've got an Integer
's method which takes one parameter
int compareTo(Integer anotherInteger)
How on earth does Integer::compareTo
get resolved to a Comparator
instance?
When a method reference points to an instance method, the parser can look for methods with arity n-1
(n
is the expected number of parameters).
Here's an excerpt from the JLS on how applicable methods are identified. I will drop the first part about parsing the expression preceding the ::
token.
Second, given a targeted function type with
n
parameters, a set of potentially applicable methods is identified:
If the method reference expression has the form
ReferenceType :: [TypeArguments] Identifier
, then the potentially applicable methods are:
the member methods of the type to search that would be potentially applicable (§15.12.2.1) for a method invocation which names Identifier, has arity n, has type arguments TypeArguments, and appears in the same class as the method reference expression; plus
the member methods of the type to search that would be potentially applicable for a method invocation which names
Identifier
, has arity n-1, has type arguments TypeArguments, and appears in the same class as the method reference expression.
Two different arities,
n
andn-1
, are considered, to account for the possibility that this form refers to either a static method or an instance method.
...
A method reference expression of the form
ReferenceType :: [TypeArguments] Identifier
can be interpreted in different ways. IfIdentifier
refers to an instance method, then the implicit lambda expression has an extra parameter compared to ifIdentifier
refers to a static method.
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se12/html/jls-15.html#jls-15.13.1
If we were to write an implicit lambda expression from that method reference, the first (implicit) parameter would be an instance to call the method on, the second (explicit) parameter would be an argument to pass in the method.
(implicitParam, anotherInteger) -> implicitParam.compareTo(anotherInteger)
Note that a method reference differs from a lambda expression, even though the former can be easily transformed into the latter. A lambda expression needs to be desugared into a new method, while a method reference usually requires only loading a corresponding constant method handle.
add a comment |
I can relate to your confusion.
We've got a Comparator
's method which declares two parameters
int compare(T o1, T o2);
and we've got an Integer
's method which takes one parameter
int compareTo(Integer anotherInteger)
How on earth does Integer::compareTo
get resolved to a Comparator
instance?
When a method reference points to an instance method, the parser can look for methods with arity n-1
(n
is the expected number of parameters).
Here's an excerpt from the JLS on how applicable methods are identified. I will drop the first part about parsing the expression preceding the ::
token.
Second, given a targeted function type with
n
parameters, a set of potentially applicable methods is identified:
If the method reference expression has the form
ReferenceType :: [TypeArguments] Identifier
, then the potentially applicable methods are:
the member methods of the type to search that would be potentially applicable (§15.12.2.1) for a method invocation which names Identifier, has arity n, has type arguments TypeArguments, and appears in the same class as the method reference expression; plus
the member methods of the type to search that would be potentially applicable for a method invocation which names
Identifier
, has arity n-1, has type arguments TypeArguments, and appears in the same class as the method reference expression.
Two different arities,
n
andn-1
, are considered, to account for the possibility that this form refers to either a static method or an instance method.
...
A method reference expression of the form
ReferenceType :: [TypeArguments] Identifier
can be interpreted in different ways. IfIdentifier
refers to an instance method, then the implicit lambda expression has an extra parameter compared to ifIdentifier
refers to a static method.
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se12/html/jls-15.html#jls-15.13.1
If we were to write an implicit lambda expression from that method reference, the first (implicit) parameter would be an instance to call the method on, the second (explicit) parameter would be an argument to pass in the method.
(implicitParam, anotherInteger) -> implicitParam.compareTo(anotherInteger)
Note that a method reference differs from a lambda expression, even though the former can be easily transformed into the latter. A lambda expression needs to be desugared into a new method, while a method reference usually requires only loading a corresponding constant method handle.
add a comment |
I can relate to your confusion.
We've got a Comparator
's method which declares two parameters
int compare(T o1, T o2);
and we've got an Integer
's method which takes one parameter
int compareTo(Integer anotherInteger)
How on earth does Integer::compareTo
get resolved to a Comparator
instance?
When a method reference points to an instance method, the parser can look for methods with arity n-1
(n
is the expected number of parameters).
Here's an excerpt from the JLS on how applicable methods are identified. I will drop the first part about parsing the expression preceding the ::
token.
Second, given a targeted function type with
n
parameters, a set of potentially applicable methods is identified:
If the method reference expression has the form
ReferenceType :: [TypeArguments] Identifier
, then the potentially applicable methods are:
the member methods of the type to search that would be potentially applicable (§15.12.2.1) for a method invocation which names Identifier, has arity n, has type arguments TypeArguments, and appears in the same class as the method reference expression; plus
the member methods of the type to search that would be potentially applicable for a method invocation which names
Identifier
, has arity n-1, has type arguments TypeArguments, and appears in the same class as the method reference expression.
Two different arities,
n
andn-1
, are considered, to account for the possibility that this form refers to either a static method or an instance method.
...
A method reference expression of the form
ReferenceType :: [TypeArguments] Identifier
can be interpreted in different ways. IfIdentifier
refers to an instance method, then the implicit lambda expression has an extra parameter compared to ifIdentifier
refers to a static method.
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se12/html/jls-15.html#jls-15.13.1
If we were to write an implicit lambda expression from that method reference, the first (implicit) parameter would be an instance to call the method on, the second (explicit) parameter would be an argument to pass in the method.
(implicitParam, anotherInteger) -> implicitParam.compareTo(anotherInteger)
Note that a method reference differs from a lambda expression, even though the former can be easily transformed into the latter. A lambda expression needs to be desugared into a new method, while a method reference usually requires only loading a corresponding constant method handle.
I can relate to your confusion.
We've got a Comparator
's method which declares two parameters
int compare(T o1, T o2);
and we've got an Integer
's method which takes one parameter
int compareTo(Integer anotherInteger)
How on earth does Integer::compareTo
get resolved to a Comparator
instance?
When a method reference points to an instance method, the parser can look for methods with arity n-1
(n
is the expected number of parameters).
Here's an excerpt from the JLS on how applicable methods are identified. I will drop the first part about parsing the expression preceding the ::
token.
Second, given a targeted function type with
n
parameters, a set of potentially applicable methods is identified:
If the method reference expression has the form
ReferenceType :: [TypeArguments] Identifier
, then the potentially applicable methods are:
the member methods of the type to search that would be potentially applicable (§15.12.2.1) for a method invocation which names Identifier, has arity n, has type arguments TypeArguments, and appears in the same class as the method reference expression; plus
the member methods of the type to search that would be potentially applicable for a method invocation which names
Identifier
, has arity n-1, has type arguments TypeArguments, and appears in the same class as the method reference expression.
Two different arities,
n
andn-1
, are considered, to account for the possibility that this form refers to either a static method or an instance method.
...
A method reference expression of the form
ReferenceType :: [TypeArguments] Identifier
can be interpreted in different ways. IfIdentifier
refers to an instance method, then the implicit lambda expression has an extra parameter compared to ifIdentifier
refers to a static method.
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se12/html/jls-15.html#jls-15.13.1
If we were to write an implicit lambda expression from that method reference, the first (implicit) parameter would be an instance to call the method on, the second (explicit) parameter would be an argument to pass in the method.
(implicitParam, anotherInteger) -> implicitParam.compareTo(anotherInteger)
Note that a method reference differs from a lambda expression, even though the former can be easily transformed into the latter. A lambda expression needs to be desugared into a new method, while a method reference usually requires only loading a corresponding constant method handle.
edited 10 hours ago
answered 11 hours ago
Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko
28.8k104591
28.8k104591
add a comment |
add a comment |
Integer
implements Comparable
by overriding compareTo
.
That overriden compareTo
, however, can be used in a way that satisfies and implements the Comparator
interface.
In its usage here
int value = intList.stream().max(Integer::compareTo).get();
it's translated to something like
int value = intList.stream().max(new Comparator<Integer>()
@Override
public int compare(Integer o1, Integer o2)
return o1.compareTo(o2);
).get();
A method reference (or lambda expression) must satisfy the signature of the corresponding functional interface's single abstract method and, in this case (Comparator
), compareTo
does.
The idea is that max
expects a Comparator
and its compare
method expects two Integer
objects. Integer::compareTo
can satisfy those expectations because it also expects two Integer
objects. The first is its receiver (the instance on which the method is to be called) and the second is the argument. With the new Java 8 syntax, the compiler translates one style to the other.
(compareTo
also returns an int
as required by Comparator#compare
.)
how doesInteger::compareTo
satisfy the signature ofComparator#compare
?compareTo(Integer)
vscompare(Integer, Integer)
?
– Andrew Tobilko
8 hours ago
@AndrewTobilko Edited with an explanation.
– Savior
7 hours ago
Did I explain it incorrectly (downvote?)?
– Savior
7 hours ago
I didn’t downvote your answer, though I disagree with the part about the compiler translating something into something else
– Andrew Tobilko
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Integer
implements Comparable
by overriding compareTo
.
That overriden compareTo
, however, can be used in a way that satisfies and implements the Comparator
interface.
In its usage here
int value = intList.stream().max(Integer::compareTo).get();
it's translated to something like
int value = intList.stream().max(new Comparator<Integer>()
@Override
public int compare(Integer o1, Integer o2)
return o1.compareTo(o2);
).get();
A method reference (or lambda expression) must satisfy the signature of the corresponding functional interface's single abstract method and, in this case (Comparator
), compareTo
does.
The idea is that max
expects a Comparator
and its compare
method expects two Integer
objects. Integer::compareTo
can satisfy those expectations because it also expects two Integer
objects. The first is its receiver (the instance on which the method is to be called) and the second is the argument. With the new Java 8 syntax, the compiler translates one style to the other.
(compareTo
also returns an int
as required by Comparator#compare
.)
how doesInteger::compareTo
satisfy the signature ofComparator#compare
?compareTo(Integer)
vscompare(Integer, Integer)
?
– Andrew Tobilko
8 hours ago
@AndrewTobilko Edited with an explanation.
– Savior
7 hours ago
Did I explain it incorrectly (downvote?)?
– Savior
7 hours ago
I didn’t downvote your answer, though I disagree with the part about the compiler translating something into something else
– Andrew Tobilko
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Integer
implements Comparable
by overriding compareTo
.
That overriden compareTo
, however, can be used in a way that satisfies and implements the Comparator
interface.
In its usage here
int value = intList.stream().max(Integer::compareTo).get();
it's translated to something like
int value = intList.stream().max(new Comparator<Integer>()
@Override
public int compare(Integer o1, Integer o2)
return o1.compareTo(o2);
).get();
A method reference (or lambda expression) must satisfy the signature of the corresponding functional interface's single abstract method and, in this case (Comparator
), compareTo
does.
The idea is that max
expects a Comparator
and its compare
method expects two Integer
objects. Integer::compareTo
can satisfy those expectations because it also expects two Integer
objects. The first is its receiver (the instance on which the method is to be called) and the second is the argument. With the new Java 8 syntax, the compiler translates one style to the other.
(compareTo
also returns an int
as required by Comparator#compare
.)
Integer
implements Comparable
by overriding compareTo
.
That overriden compareTo
, however, can be used in a way that satisfies and implements the Comparator
interface.
In its usage here
int value = intList.stream().max(Integer::compareTo).get();
it's translated to something like
int value = intList.stream().max(new Comparator<Integer>()
@Override
public int compare(Integer o1, Integer o2)
return o1.compareTo(o2);
).get();
A method reference (or lambda expression) must satisfy the signature of the corresponding functional interface's single abstract method and, in this case (Comparator
), compareTo
does.
The idea is that max
expects a Comparator
and its compare
method expects two Integer
objects. Integer::compareTo
can satisfy those expectations because it also expects two Integer
objects. The first is its receiver (the instance on which the method is to be called) and the second is the argument. With the new Java 8 syntax, the compiler translates one style to the other.
(compareTo
also returns an int
as required by Comparator#compare
.)
edited 7 hours ago
answered 12 hours ago
SaviorSavior
1,60021331
1,60021331
how doesInteger::compareTo
satisfy the signature ofComparator#compare
?compareTo(Integer)
vscompare(Integer, Integer)
?
– Andrew Tobilko
8 hours ago
@AndrewTobilko Edited with an explanation.
– Savior
7 hours ago
Did I explain it incorrectly (downvote?)?
– Savior
7 hours ago
I didn’t downvote your answer, though I disagree with the part about the compiler translating something into something else
– Andrew Tobilko
7 hours ago
add a comment |
how doesInteger::compareTo
satisfy the signature ofComparator#compare
?compareTo(Integer)
vscompare(Integer, Integer)
?
– Andrew Tobilko
8 hours ago
@AndrewTobilko Edited with an explanation.
– Savior
7 hours ago
Did I explain it incorrectly (downvote?)?
– Savior
7 hours ago
I didn’t downvote your answer, though I disagree with the part about the compiler translating something into something else
– Andrew Tobilko
7 hours ago
how does
Integer::compareTo
satisfy the signature of Comparator#compare
? compareTo(Integer)
vs compare(Integer, Integer)
?– Andrew Tobilko
8 hours ago
how does
Integer::compareTo
satisfy the signature of Comparator#compare
? compareTo(Integer)
vs compare(Integer, Integer)
?– Andrew Tobilko
8 hours ago
@AndrewTobilko Edited with an explanation.
– Savior
7 hours ago
@AndrewTobilko Edited with an explanation.
– Savior
7 hours ago
Did I explain it incorrectly (downvote?)?
– Savior
7 hours ago
Did I explain it incorrectly (downvote?)?
– Savior
7 hours ago
I didn’t downvote your answer, though I disagree with the part about the compiler translating something into something else
– Andrew Tobilko
7 hours ago
I didn’t downvote your answer, though I disagree with the part about the compiler translating something into something else
– Andrew Tobilko
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55694015%2fjava-8-stream-max-function-argument-type-comparator-vs-comparable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
-java, java-8, java-stream
2
Integer::compareTo
does not return a Comparable - it is the short definition for: "Please compiler generate a matching implementation for the type that is needed (in this caseComparator
) and map the arguments to the specified function." In this case the function requires two "arguments" (this
and the one parameter ofcompareTo
) and the Comparator provides two arguments -> works.– Robert
11 hours ago
4
""Please compiler, generate..." ... compilers always respond best to politeness and courtesy :-)
– scottb
11 hours ago
1
Related: stackoverflow.com/questions/22561614/…
– Oleksandr
7 hours ago