Recording with midi/synth vs actual instrument? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InCan someone learn practicing piano with a MIDI keyboard?MIDI-Keyboards with integrated audio?Connecting Maschine to SynthSet a fixed velocity for keyboard MIDI input while recording on Reason PropellerheadMusic Creation Software for Midi and Yamaha SynthIs it possible with any recording software to snap to quarter notes when recording from MIDI keyboard?Digital pianos and/or midi keyboards with narrower keysClicks in bass tracksCan MIDI latency before soft synth/audio rendering be an issue?Keyboard vs Midi-Controller for Recording and Practice

Output the Arecibo Message

How do I free up internal storage if I don't have any apps downloaded?

Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric?

Can you cast a spell on someone in the Ethereal Plane, if you are on the Material Plane and have the True Seeing spell active?

Why didn't the Event Horizon Telescope team mention Sagittarius A*?

What is preventing me from simply constructing a hash that's lower than the current target?

Likelihood that a superbug or lethal virus could come from a landfill

RequirePermission not working

Did any laptop computers have a built-in 5 1/4 inch floppy drive?

How to translate "being like"?

How do PCB vias affect signal quality?

Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

Worn-tile Scrabble

What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?

What is this business jet?

Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?

Why does the nucleus not repel itself?

Will it cause any balance problems to have PCs level up and gain the benefits of a long rest mid-fight?

What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation

What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?

A word that means fill it to the required quantity

Pokemon Turn Based battle (Python)

How to type a long/em dash `—`



Recording with midi/synth vs actual instrument?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InCan someone learn practicing piano with a MIDI keyboard?MIDI-Keyboards with integrated audio?Connecting Maschine to SynthSet a fixed velocity for keyboard MIDI input while recording on Reason PropellerheadMusic Creation Software for Midi and Yamaha SynthIs it possible with any recording software to snap to quarter notes when recording from MIDI keyboard?Digital pianos and/or midi keyboards with narrower keysClicks in bass tracksCan MIDI latency before soft synth/audio rendering be an issue?Keyboard vs Midi-Controller for Recording and Practice










6















Just wondering if there's any guidelines as far as recording a real instrument versus using a midi controller or synth. For example, let's say I have a song that I need a piano part for. I could set up a microphone on an actual piano or I could just use a midi controller or synthesizer with a piano sound. Are there any benefits to recording a real instrument- wouldn't the mic introduce background noise and make things harder to edit?



In my specific case, the background beat is midi based but I'm trying to decide if I should make the melody using a real instrument or midi.










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    Going to remove these comments. Shev - you know your comment is entirely opinion based, and both - let's not get into pointless bickering in comments.

    – Doktor Mayhem
    yesterday















6















Just wondering if there's any guidelines as far as recording a real instrument versus using a midi controller or synth. For example, let's say I have a song that I need a piano part for. I could set up a microphone on an actual piano or I could just use a midi controller or synthesizer with a piano sound. Are there any benefits to recording a real instrument- wouldn't the mic introduce background noise and make things harder to edit?



In my specific case, the background beat is midi based but I'm trying to decide if I should make the melody using a real instrument or midi.










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    Going to remove these comments. Shev - you know your comment is entirely opinion based, and both - let's not get into pointless bickering in comments.

    – Doktor Mayhem
    yesterday













6












6








6








Just wondering if there's any guidelines as far as recording a real instrument versus using a midi controller or synth. For example, let's say I have a song that I need a piano part for. I could set up a microphone on an actual piano or I could just use a midi controller or synthesizer with a piano sound. Are there any benefits to recording a real instrument- wouldn't the mic introduce background noise and make things harder to edit?



In my specific case, the background beat is midi based but I'm trying to decide if I should make the melody using a real instrument or midi.










share|improve this question
















Just wondering if there's any guidelines as far as recording a real instrument versus using a midi controller or synth. For example, let's say I have a song that I need a piano part for. I could set up a microphone on an actual piano or I could just use a midi controller or synthesizer with a piano sound. Are there any benefits to recording a real instrument- wouldn't the mic introduce background noise and make things harder to edit?



In my specific case, the background beat is midi based but I'm trying to decide if I should make the melody using a real instrument or midi.







midi-controller-keyboard production






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday







foreyez

















asked 2 days ago









foreyezforeyez

5,45832687




5,45832687







  • 1





    Going to remove these comments. Shev - you know your comment is entirely opinion based, and both - let's not get into pointless bickering in comments.

    – Doktor Mayhem
    yesterday












  • 1





    Going to remove these comments. Shev - you know your comment is entirely opinion based, and both - let's not get into pointless bickering in comments.

    – Doktor Mayhem
    yesterday







1




1





Going to remove these comments. Shev - you know your comment is entirely opinion based, and both - let's not get into pointless bickering in comments.

– Doktor Mayhem
yesterday





Going to remove these comments. Shev - you know your comment is entirely opinion based, and both - let's not get into pointless bickering in comments.

– Doktor Mayhem
yesterday










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















10















[are there] any guidelines as far as recording a mechanical instrument versus using a midi controller or synth?




No, only pros and cons. It all depends on what you want the finished product to sound like, and what instruments and equipment you have available to you.




Are there any benefits to recording a real instrument [eg piano]?




Assuming you have an adequately skilled pianist, a decent quality piano which is in tune, and a decent microphone or microphones for the job, then yes, absolutely there are benefits. It will sound real!




wouldn't the mic introduce background noise and make things harder to edit?




Yes, it will introduce a little noise. But assuming you have a relatively quiet space to record, it shouldn't be an issue. As for editing, that all depends on what sorts of edits you're doing and why.



Personally, I would use midi in these situations:



  1. I'm just working on a mock-up, not a final recording

  2. I don't play the instrument and don't have access to someone who does

  3. I play the instrument but don't have access to a real one

  4. I am not concerned with realism and actually want the sound of the sample or synth.

  5. I don't have microphones (or any other recording hardware) required to do a decent job of recording the real thing.





share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    You could also add 6. Even with microphones I don't have the skills or the time to experiment with getting a good recorded sound. And 7. I don't have access to a decent instrument in a decent acoustic space. And possibly 8. I'm recording with microphones, but I've got MIDI facilities on the instrument so I'll record that as well, just in case, because it doesn't take much space or extra time to set up, and it gives me another layer of backup.

    – Graham
    yesterday











  • And even 8) I'm not consistently good enough to play the part needed on that instrument, although it's very similar to (2).

    – user45266
    12 hours ago


















8














The real instrument will sound more real, but as you note, there are many challenges to recording acoustic instruments or anything with a microphone that are completely bypassed when using a virtual instrument plugin.



With a plugin, you don't have to have an audio interface, microphone or cables. You don't have to have an actual acoustic instrument, which usually cost much more than a good plugin, DAW, computer, and controller combined. You don't have to make sure the plugin is in tune. You don't have to have a quiet room with good acoustics to record in.



So in all ways except sound quality, plugins are much easier to work with. These days plugins sound very good. They still don't sound exactly the same, but the convenience and cost savings that they offer makes them a very popular tradeoff.



Regarding editing, in my experience it's about the same. Editing an audio recording of a plugin is about the same difficulty as editing audio of an acoustic instrument. Editing the MIDI that is fed into a plugin can be easier than editing audio, but it has its own quirks.



Note that there are services online where you can send you MIDI tracks to and they will record the actual acoustic instruments for you in quality studios with quality equipment. The costs vary, but if you really want the acoustic sound and don't want to have to figure all of that out for yourself, you can pay to have a track recorded "for real".






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    Bizarrely, in the 90s I used to do that the other way round. Record a performance on a real Disklavier in one of the piano demonstration rooms at Yamaha, then take the midi back to the studio & replace it with a rompler. [It was all for promotional purposes, not a route I would ordinarily take] We actually released a physical album of material done that way.

    – Tetsujin
    yesterday



















4














For most instruments (apart from piano), if you have access to the real instrument and a real player, and cost isn't a factor, and realism is seen as a plus point, then you'd probably go for the real instrument. It's very hard to achieve a performance with most synthesizers (including plugins) where all the articulations sound at they would on a real instrument.



Some of the same logic holds for piano, but piano is perhaps something of a special case as there are relatively few difficulties in synthesizing it well, and the market for piano-style midi controllers is much more developed than that for controllers for any other instrument. So if you can find a player who feels able to perform on a controller and synth you have access to, there's every chance of capturing an acceptable performance, with some added possibilities for directly redefining the midi, or changing the instrument sound or the ambience after the fact.



Even then, for a critical part (such as a solo piano piece) there will be plenty to be said for captioning the sound of a performer interacting with a suitable real instrument in a nice-sounding space.






share|improve this answer























  • Additionally, real acoustic pianos have problems with being out of tune. Unless you get the piano tuned right before you record, it will likely be out of tune with the other instruments and possibly out of tune with itself.

    – Peter
    2 days ago











  • @Peter: You seem to have some reservations against pianos in general. One of decent quality will surely be more than adequate if tuned somewhat recenly. It is completely normal, that other instruments have to adjust their tuning to the piano (instead of the other way round), because a technician is expensive and it takes him quite some time to complete.

    – guidot
    yesterday






  • 1





    @Peter It'll only "likely" be out of tune if it's poorly maintained. If you're planning on recording with it, you spend a small amount on getting it tuned first, which is a trivial amount compared to the cost of making a recording.

    – Graham
    yesterday











  • @guidot - I'm not sure where you got the idea that I'm against pianos. They are great, but I was trying to give some extra info to the OP. Unlike other instruments with strings, pianos can't be easily tuned by an amateur, so they tend to get slowly out of tune, but the notes don't all go out at the same rate, so even if others adjust, it can be out of tune with itself.

    – Peter
    yesterday











  • @Graham I think we're in 100% agreement. I pointed out that a piano needs to be tuned right before recording in my post. Perhaps you haven't played many pianos in the real world, but they are often out of tune.

    – Peter
    yesterday


















1














I think miking up a piano for the first time in your life, in a non-tuned room, is going to be several levels of hell harder than getting something acceptable out of a sample player.



Piano recording is a whole study in itself & really no two engineers agree on exactly which is the 'best' way.



Conversely, pretty much any half decent piano 'rompler' will have had all that time & effort already spent on getting the sound right - you just have to pick the one you like best & suits the part best - something you also couldn't do with a single piano in a single room, even if you had all the rest of the expertise.



Additionally, you can fix bum notes in midi without having to do re-takes until the performance is perfect.



Go with a midi rompler & don't look back.



If you ever get to re-record the piece at Abbey Road or Air Lyndhurst, forget all I've said & use their piano & engineers - & hire a pianist who can get it in one take. ;)






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "240"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f82562%2frecording-with-midi-synth-vs-actual-instrument%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    10















    [are there] any guidelines as far as recording a mechanical instrument versus using a midi controller or synth?




    No, only pros and cons. It all depends on what you want the finished product to sound like, and what instruments and equipment you have available to you.




    Are there any benefits to recording a real instrument [eg piano]?




    Assuming you have an adequately skilled pianist, a decent quality piano which is in tune, and a decent microphone or microphones for the job, then yes, absolutely there are benefits. It will sound real!




    wouldn't the mic introduce background noise and make things harder to edit?




    Yes, it will introduce a little noise. But assuming you have a relatively quiet space to record, it shouldn't be an issue. As for editing, that all depends on what sorts of edits you're doing and why.



    Personally, I would use midi in these situations:



    1. I'm just working on a mock-up, not a final recording

    2. I don't play the instrument and don't have access to someone who does

    3. I play the instrument but don't have access to a real one

    4. I am not concerned with realism and actually want the sound of the sample or synth.

    5. I don't have microphones (or any other recording hardware) required to do a decent job of recording the real thing.





    share|improve this answer


















    • 1





      You could also add 6. Even with microphones I don't have the skills or the time to experiment with getting a good recorded sound. And 7. I don't have access to a decent instrument in a decent acoustic space. And possibly 8. I'm recording with microphones, but I've got MIDI facilities on the instrument so I'll record that as well, just in case, because it doesn't take much space or extra time to set up, and it gives me another layer of backup.

      – Graham
      yesterday











    • And even 8) I'm not consistently good enough to play the part needed on that instrument, although it's very similar to (2).

      – user45266
      12 hours ago















    10















    [are there] any guidelines as far as recording a mechanical instrument versus using a midi controller or synth?




    No, only pros and cons. It all depends on what you want the finished product to sound like, and what instruments and equipment you have available to you.




    Are there any benefits to recording a real instrument [eg piano]?




    Assuming you have an adequately skilled pianist, a decent quality piano which is in tune, and a decent microphone or microphones for the job, then yes, absolutely there are benefits. It will sound real!




    wouldn't the mic introduce background noise and make things harder to edit?




    Yes, it will introduce a little noise. But assuming you have a relatively quiet space to record, it shouldn't be an issue. As for editing, that all depends on what sorts of edits you're doing and why.



    Personally, I would use midi in these situations:



    1. I'm just working on a mock-up, not a final recording

    2. I don't play the instrument and don't have access to someone who does

    3. I play the instrument but don't have access to a real one

    4. I am not concerned with realism and actually want the sound of the sample or synth.

    5. I don't have microphones (or any other recording hardware) required to do a decent job of recording the real thing.





    share|improve this answer


















    • 1





      You could also add 6. Even with microphones I don't have the skills or the time to experiment with getting a good recorded sound. And 7. I don't have access to a decent instrument in a decent acoustic space. And possibly 8. I'm recording with microphones, but I've got MIDI facilities on the instrument so I'll record that as well, just in case, because it doesn't take much space or extra time to set up, and it gives me another layer of backup.

      – Graham
      yesterday











    • And even 8) I'm not consistently good enough to play the part needed on that instrument, although it's very similar to (2).

      – user45266
      12 hours ago













    10












    10








    10








    [are there] any guidelines as far as recording a mechanical instrument versus using a midi controller or synth?




    No, only pros and cons. It all depends on what you want the finished product to sound like, and what instruments and equipment you have available to you.




    Are there any benefits to recording a real instrument [eg piano]?




    Assuming you have an adequately skilled pianist, a decent quality piano which is in tune, and a decent microphone or microphones for the job, then yes, absolutely there are benefits. It will sound real!




    wouldn't the mic introduce background noise and make things harder to edit?




    Yes, it will introduce a little noise. But assuming you have a relatively quiet space to record, it shouldn't be an issue. As for editing, that all depends on what sorts of edits you're doing and why.



    Personally, I would use midi in these situations:



    1. I'm just working on a mock-up, not a final recording

    2. I don't play the instrument and don't have access to someone who does

    3. I play the instrument but don't have access to a real one

    4. I am not concerned with realism and actually want the sound of the sample or synth.

    5. I don't have microphones (or any other recording hardware) required to do a decent job of recording the real thing.





    share|improve this answer














    [are there] any guidelines as far as recording a mechanical instrument versus using a midi controller or synth?




    No, only pros and cons. It all depends on what you want the finished product to sound like, and what instruments and equipment you have available to you.




    Are there any benefits to recording a real instrument [eg piano]?




    Assuming you have an adequately skilled pianist, a decent quality piano which is in tune, and a decent microphone or microphones for the job, then yes, absolutely there are benefits. It will sound real!




    wouldn't the mic introduce background noise and make things harder to edit?




    Yes, it will introduce a little noise. But assuming you have a relatively quiet space to record, it shouldn't be an issue. As for editing, that all depends on what sorts of edits you're doing and why.



    Personally, I would use midi in these situations:



    1. I'm just working on a mock-up, not a final recording

    2. I don't play the instrument and don't have access to someone who does

    3. I play the instrument but don't have access to a real one

    4. I am not concerned with realism and actually want the sound of the sample or synth.

    5. I don't have microphones (or any other recording hardware) required to do a decent job of recording the real thing.






    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 2 days ago









    ibonyunibonyun

    1864




    1864







    • 1





      You could also add 6. Even with microphones I don't have the skills or the time to experiment with getting a good recorded sound. And 7. I don't have access to a decent instrument in a decent acoustic space. And possibly 8. I'm recording with microphones, but I've got MIDI facilities on the instrument so I'll record that as well, just in case, because it doesn't take much space or extra time to set up, and it gives me another layer of backup.

      – Graham
      yesterday











    • And even 8) I'm not consistently good enough to play the part needed on that instrument, although it's very similar to (2).

      – user45266
      12 hours ago












    • 1





      You could also add 6. Even with microphones I don't have the skills or the time to experiment with getting a good recorded sound. And 7. I don't have access to a decent instrument in a decent acoustic space. And possibly 8. I'm recording with microphones, but I've got MIDI facilities on the instrument so I'll record that as well, just in case, because it doesn't take much space or extra time to set up, and it gives me another layer of backup.

      – Graham
      yesterday











    • And even 8) I'm not consistently good enough to play the part needed on that instrument, although it's very similar to (2).

      – user45266
      12 hours ago







    1




    1





    You could also add 6. Even with microphones I don't have the skills or the time to experiment with getting a good recorded sound. And 7. I don't have access to a decent instrument in a decent acoustic space. And possibly 8. I'm recording with microphones, but I've got MIDI facilities on the instrument so I'll record that as well, just in case, because it doesn't take much space or extra time to set up, and it gives me another layer of backup.

    – Graham
    yesterday





    You could also add 6. Even with microphones I don't have the skills or the time to experiment with getting a good recorded sound. And 7. I don't have access to a decent instrument in a decent acoustic space. And possibly 8. I'm recording with microphones, but I've got MIDI facilities on the instrument so I'll record that as well, just in case, because it doesn't take much space or extra time to set up, and it gives me another layer of backup.

    – Graham
    yesterday













    And even 8) I'm not consistently good enough to play the part needed on that instrument, although it's very similar to (2).

    – user45266
    12 hours ago





    And even 8) I'm not consistently good enough to play the part needed on that instrument, although it's very similar to (2).

    – user45266
    12 hours ago











    8














    The real instrument will sound more real, but as you note, there are many challenges to recording acoustic instruments or anything with a microphone that are completely bypassed when using a virtual instrument plugin.



    With a plugin, you don't have to have an audio interface, microphone or cables. You don't have to have an actual acoustic instrument, which usually cost much more than a good plugin, DAW, computer, and controller combined. You don't have to make sure the plugin is in tune. You don't have to have a quiet room with good acoustics to record in.



    So in all ways except sound quality, plugins are much easier to work with. These days plugins sound very good. They still don't sound exactly the same, but the convenience and cost savings that they offer makes them a very popular tradeoff.



    Regarding editing, in my experience it's about the same. Editing an audio recording of a plugin is about the same difficulty as editing audio of an acoustic instrument. Editing the MIDI that is fed into a plugin can be easier than editing audio, but it has its own quirks.



    Note that there are services online where you can send you MIDI tracks to and they will record the actual acoustic instruments for you in quality studios with quality equipment. The costs vary, but if you really want the acoustic sound and don't want to have to figure all of that out for yourself, you can pay to have a track recorded "for real".






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1





      Bizarrely, in the 90s I used to do that the other way round. Record a performance on a real Disklavier in one of the piano demonstration rooms at Yamaha, then take the midi back to the studio & replace it with a rompler. [It was all for promotional purposes, not a route I would ordinarily take] We actually released a physical album of material done that way.

      – Tetsujin
      yesterday
















    8














    The real instrument will sound more real, but as you note, there are many challenges to recording acoustic instruments or anything with a microphone that are completely bypassed when using a virtual instrument plugin.



    With a plugin, you don't have to have an audio interface, microphone or cables. You don't have to have an actual acoustic instrument, which usually cost much more than a good plugin, DAW, computer, and controller combined. You don't have to make sure the plugin is in tune. You don't have to have a quiet room with good acoustics to record in.



    So in all ways except sound quality, plugins are much easier to work with. These days plugins sound very good. They still don't sound exactly the same, but the convenience and cost savings that they offer makes them a very popular tradeoff.



    Regarding editing, in my experience it's about the same. Editing an audio recording of a plugin is about the same difficulty as editing audio of an acoustic instrument. Editing the MIDI that is fed into a plugin can be easier than editing audio, but it has its own quirks.



    Note that there are services online where you can send you MIDI tracks to and they will record the actual acoustic instruments for you in quality studios with quality equipment. The costs vary, but if you really want the acoustic sound and don't want to have to figure all of that out for yourself, you can pay to have a track recorded "for real".






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1





      Bizarrely, in the 90s I used to do that the other way round. Record a performance on a real Disklavier in one of the piano demonstration rooms at Yamaha, then take the midi back to the studio & replace it with a rompler. [It was all for promotional purposes, not a route I would ordinarily take] We actually released a physical album of material done that way.

      – Tetsujin
      yesterday














    8












    8








    8







    The real instrument will sound more real, but as you note, there are many challenges to recording acoustic instruments or anything with a microphone that are completely bypassed when using a virtual instrument plugin.



    With a plugin, you don't have to have an audio interface, microphone or cables. You don't have to have an actual acoustic instrument, which usually cost much more than a good plugin, DAW, computer, and controller combined. You don't have to make sure the plugin is in tune. You don't have to have a quiet room with good acoustics to record in.



    So in all ways except sound quality, plugins are much easier to work with. These days plugins sound very good. They still don't sound exactly the same, but the convenience and cost savings that they offer makes them a very popular tradeoff.



    Regarding editing, in my experience it's about the same. Editing an audio recording of a plugin is about the same difficulty as editing audio of an acoustic instrument. Editing the MIDI that is fed into a plugin can be easier than editing audio, but it has its own quirks.



    Note that there are services online where you can send you MIDI tracks to and they will record the actual acoustic instruments for you in quality studios with quality equipment. The costs vary, but if you really want the acoustic sound and don't want to have to figure all of that out for yourself, you can pay to have a track recorded "for real".






    share|improve this answer













    The real instrument will sound more real, but as you note, there are many challenges to recording acoustic instruments or anything with a microphone that are completely bypassed when using a virtual instrument plugin.



    With a plugin, you don't have to have an audio interface, microphone or cables. You don't have to have an actual acoustic instrument, which usually cost much more than a good plugin, DAW, computer, and controller combined. You don't have to make sure the plugin is in tune. You don't have to have a quiet room with good acoustics to record in.



    So in all ways except sound quality, plugins are much easier to work with. These days plugins sound very good. They still don't sound exactly the same, but the convenience and cost savings that they offer makes them a very popular tradeoff.



    Regarding editing, in my experience it's about the same. Editing an audio recording of a plugin is about the same difficulty as editing audio of an acoustic instrument. Editing the MIDI that is fed into a plugin can be easier than editing audio, but it has its own quirks.



    Note that there are services online where you can send you MIDI tracks to and they will record the actual acoustic instruments for you in quality studios with quality equipment. The costs vary, but if you really want the acoustic sound and don't want to have to figure all of that out for yourself, you can pay to have a track recorded "for real".







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 2 days ago









    Todd WilcoxTodd Wilcox

    37.2k369124




    37.2k369124







    • 1





      Bizarrely, in the 90s I used to do that the other way round. Record a performance on a real Disklavier in one of the piano demonstration rooms at Yamaha, then take the midi back to the studio & replace it with a rompler. [It was all for promotional purposes, not a route I would ordinarily take] We actually released a physical album of material done that way.

      – Tetsujin
      yesterday













    • 1





      Bizarrely, in the 90s I used to do that the other way round. Record a performance on a real Disklavier in one of the piano demonstration rooms at Yamaha, then take the midi back to the studio & replace it with a rompler. [It was all for promotional purposes, not a route I would ordinarily take] We actually released a physical album of material done that way.

      – Tetsujin
      yesterday








    1




    1





    Bizarrely, in the 90s I used to do that the other way round. Record a performance on a real Disklavier in one of the piano demonstration rooms at Yamaha, then take the midi back to the studio & replace it with a rompler. [It was all for promotional purposes, not a route I would ordinarily take] We actually released a physical album of material done that way.

    – Tetsujin
    yesterday






    Bizarrely, in the 90s I used to do that the other way round. Record a performance on a real Disklavier in one of the piano demonstration rooms at Yamaha, then take the midi back to the studio & replace it with a rompler. [It was all for promotional purposes, not a route I would ordinarily take] We actually released a physical album of material done that way.

    – Tetsujin
    yesterday












    4














    For most instruments (apart from piano), if you have access to the real instrument and a real player, and cost isn't a factor, and realism is seen as a plus point, then you'd probably go for the real instrument. It's very hard to achieve a performance with most synthesizers (including plugins) where all the articulations sound at they would on a real instrument.



    Some of the same logic holds for piano, but piano is perhaps something of a special case as there are relatively few difficulties in synthesizing it well, and the market for piano-style midi controllers is much more developed than that for controllers for any other instrument. So if you can find a player who feels able to perform on a controller and synth you have access to, there's every chance of capturing an acceptable performance, with some added possibilities for directly redefining the midi, or changing the instrument sound or the ambience after the fact.



    Even then, for a critical part (such as a solo piano piece) there will be plenty to be said for captioning the sound of a performer interacting with a suitable real instrument in a nice-sounding space.






    share|improve this answer























    • Additionally, real acoustic pianos have problems with being out of tune. Unless you get the piano tuned right before you record, it will likely be out of tune with the other instruments and possibly out of tune with itself.

      – Peter
      2 days ago











    • @Peter: You seem to have some reservations against pianos in general. One of decent quality will surely be more than adequate if tuned somewhat recenly. It is completely normal, that other instruments have to adjust their tuning to the piano (instead of the other way round), because a technician is expensive and it takes him quite some time to complete.

      – guidot
      yesterday






    • 1





      @Peter It'll only "likely" be out of tune if it's poorly maintained. If you're planning on recording with it, you spend a small amount on getting it tuned first, which is a trivial amount compared to the cost of making a recording.

      – Graham
      yesterday











    • @guidot - I'm not sure where you got the idea that I'm against pianos. They are great, but I was trying to give some extra info to the OP. Unlike other instruments with strings, pianos can't be easily tuned by an amateur, so they tend to get slowly out of tune, but the notes don't all go out at the same rate, so even if others adjust, it can be out of tune with itself.

      – Peter
      yesterday











    • @Graham I think we're in 100% agreement. I pointed out that a piano needs to be tuned right before recording in my post. Perhaps you haven't played many pianos in the real world, but they are often out of tune.

      – Peter
      yesterday















    4














    For most instruments (apart from piano), if you have access to the real instrument and a real player, and cost isn't a factor, and realism is seen as a plus point, then you'd probably go for the real instrument. It's very hard to achieve a performance with most synthesizers (including plugins) where all the articulations sound at they would on a real instrument.



    Some of the same logic holds for piano, but piano is perhaps something of a special case as there are relatively few difficulties in synthesizing it well, and the market for piano-style midi controllers is much more developed than that for controllers for any other instrument. So if you can find a player who feels able to perform on a controller and synth you have access to, there's every chance of capturing an acceptable performance, with some added possibilities for directly redefining the midi, or changing the instrument sound or the ambience after the fact.



    Even then, for a critical part (such as a solo piano piece) there will be plenty to be said for captioning the sound of a performer interacting with a suitable real instrument in a nice-sounding space.






    share|improve this answer























    • Additionally, real acoustic pianos have problems with being out of tune. Unless you get the piano tuned right before you record, it will likely be out of tune with the other instruments and possibly out of tune with itself.

      – Peter
      2 days ago











    • @Peter: You seem to have some reservations against pianos in general. One of decent quality will surely be more than adequate if tuned somewhat recenly. It is completely normal, that other instruments have to adjust their tuning to the piano (instead of the other way round), because a technician is expensive and it takes him quite some time to complete.

      – guidot
      yesterday






    • 1





      @Peter It'll only "likely" be out of tune if it's poorly maintained. If you're planning on recording with it, you spend a small amount on getting it tuned first, which is a trivial amount compared to the cost of making a recording.

      – Graham
      yesterday











    • @guidot - I'm not sure where you got the idea that I'm against pianos. They are great, but I was trying to give some extra info to the OP. Unlike other instruments with strings, pianos can't be easily tuned by an amateur, so they tend to get slowly out of tune, but the notes don't all go out at the same rate, so even if others adjust, it can be out of tune with itself.

      – Peter
      yesterday











    • @Graham I think we're in 100% agreement. I pointed out that a piano needs to be tuned right before recording in my post. Perhaps you haven't played many pianos in the real world, but they are often out of tune.

      – Peter
      yesterday













    4












    4








    4







    For most instruments (apart from piano), if you have access to the real instrument and a real player, and cost isn't a factor, and realism is seen as a plus point, then you'd probably go for the real instrument. It's very hard to achieve a performance with most synthesizers (including plugins) where all the articulations sound at they would on a real instrument.



    Some of the same logic holds for piano, but piano is perhaps something of a special case as there are relatively few difficulties in synthesizing it well, and the market for piano-style midi controllers is much more developed than that for controllers for any other instrument. So if you can find a player who feels able to perform on a controller and synth you have access to, there's every chance of capturing an acceptable performance, with some added possibilities for directly redefining the midi, or changing the instrument sound or the ambience after the fact.



    Even then, for a critical part (such as a solo piano piece) there will be plenty to be said for captioning the sound of a performer interacting with a suitable real instrument in a nice-sounding space.






    share|improve this answer













    For most instruments (apart from piano), if you have access to the real instrument and a real player, and cost isn't a factor, and realism is seen as a plus point, then you'd probably go for the real instrument. It's very hard to achieve a performance with most synthesizers (including plugins) where all the articulations sound at they would on a real instrument.



    Some of the same logic holds for piano, but piano is perhaps something of a special case as there are relatively few difficulties in synthesizing it well, and the market for piano-style midi controllers is much more developed than that for controllers for any other instrument. So if you can find a player who feels able to perform on a controller and synth you have access to, there's every chance of capturing an acceptable performance, with some added possibilities for directly redefining the midi, or changing the instrument sound or the ambience after the fact.



    Even then, for a critical part (such as a solo piano piece) there will be plenty to be said for captioning the sound of a performer interacting with a suitable real instrument in a nice-sounding space.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 2 days ago









    topo mortotopo morto

    27.2k246109




    27.2k246109












    • Additionally, real acoustic pianos have problems with being out of tune. Unless you get the piano tuned right before you record, it will likely be out of tune with the other instruments and possibly out of tune with itself.

      – Peter
      2 days ago











    • @Peter: You seem to have some reservations against pianos in general. One of decent quality will surely be more than adequate if tuned somewhat recenly. It is completely normal, that other instruments have to adjust their tuning to the piano (instead of the other way round), because a technician is expensive and it takes him quite some time to complete.

      – guidot
      yesterday






    • 1





      @Peter It'll only "likely" be out of tune if it's poorly maintained. If you're planning on recording with it, you spend a small amount on getting it tuned first, which is a trivial amount compared to the cost of making a recording.

      – Graham
      yesterday











    • @guidot - I'm not sure where you got the idea that I'm against pianos. They are great, but I was trying to give some extra info to the OP. Unlike other instruments with strings, pianos can't be easily tuned by an amateur, so they tend to get slowly out of tune, but the notes don't all go out at the same rate, so even if others adjust, it can be out of tune with itself.

      – Peter
      yesterday











    • @Graham I think we're in 100% agreement. I pointed out that a piano needs to be tuned right before recording in my post. Perhaps you haven't played many pianos in the real world, but they are often out of tune.

      – Peter
      yesterday

















    • Additionally, real acoustic pianos have problems with being out of tune. Unless you get the piano tuned right before you record, it will likely be out of tune with the other instruments and possibly out of tune with itself.

      – Peter
      2 days ago











    • @Peter: You seem to have some reservations against pianos in general. One of decent quality will surely be more than adequate if tuned somewhat recenly. It is completely normal, that other instruments have to adjust their tuning to the piano (instead of the other way round), because a technician is expensive and it takes him quite some time to complete.

      – guidot
      yesterday






    • 1





      @Peter It'll only "likely" be out of tune if it's poorly maintained. If you're planning on recording with it, you spend a small amount on getting it tuned first, which is a trivial amount compared to the cost of making a recording.

      – Graham
      yesterday











    • @guidot - I'm not sure where you got the idea that I'm against pianos. They are great, but I was trying to give some extra info to the OP. Unlike other instruments with strings, pianos can't be easily tuned by an amateur, so they tend to get slowly out of tune, but the notes don't all go out at the same rate, so even if others adjust, it can be out of tune with itself.

      – Peter
      yesterday











    • @Graham I think we're in 100% agreement. I pointed out that a piano needs to be tuned right before recording in my post. Perhaps you haven't played many pianos in the real world, but they are often out of tune.

      – Peter
      yesterday
















    Additionally, real acoustic pianos have problems with being out of tune. Unless you get the piano tuned right before you record, it will likely be out of tune with the other instruments and possibly out of tune with itself.

    – Peter
    2 days ago





    Additionally, real acoustic pianos have problems with being out of tune. Unless you get the piano tuned right before you record, it will likely be out of tune with the other instruments and possibly out of tune with itself.

    – Peter
    2 days ago













    @Peter: You seem to have some reservations against pianos in general. One of decent quality will surely be more than adequate if tuned somewhat recenly. It is completely normal, that other instruments have to adjust their tuning to the piano (instead of the other way round), because a technician is expensive and it takes him quite some time to complete.

    – guidot
    yesterday





    @Peter: You seem to have some reservations against pianos in general. One of decent quality will surely be more than adequate if tuned somewhat recenly. It is completely normal, that other instruments have to adjust their tuning to the piano (instead of the other way round), because a technician is expensive and it takes him quite some time to complete.

    – guidot
    yesterday




    1




    1





    @Peter It'll only "likely" be out of tune if it's poorly maintained. If you're planning on recording with it, you spend a small amount on getting it tuned first, which is a trivial amount compared to the cost of making a recording.

    – Graham
    yesterday





    @Peter It'll only "likely" be out of tune if it's poorly maintained. If you're planning on recording with it, you spend a small amount on getting it tuned first, which is a trivial amount compared to the cost of making a recording.

    – Graham
    yesterday













    @guidot - I'm not sure where you got the idea that I'm against pianos. They are great, but I was trying to give some extra info to the OP. Unlike other instruments with strings, pianos can't be easily tuned by an amateur, so they tend to get slowly out of tune, but the notes don't all go out at the same rate, so even if others adjust, it can be out of tune with itself.

    – Peter
    yesterday





    @guidot - I'm not sure where you got the idea that I'm against pianos. They are great, but I was trying to give some extra info to the OP. Unlike other instruments with strings, pianos can't be easily tuned by an amateur, so they tend to get slowly out of tune, but the notes don't all go out at the same rate, so even if others adjust, it can be out of tune with itself.

    – Peter
    yesterday













    @Graham I think we're in 100% agreement. I pointed out that a piano needs to be tuned right before recording in my post. Perhaps you haven't played many pianos in the real world, but they are often out of tune.

    – Peter
    yesterday





    @Graham I think we're in 100% agreement. I pointed out that a piano needs to be tuned right before recording in my post. Perhaps you haven't played many pianos in the real world, but they are often out of tune.

    – Peter
    yesterday











    1














    I think miking up a piano for the first time in your life, in a non-tuned room, is going to be several levels of hell harder than getting something acceptable out of a sample player.



    Piano recording is a whole study in itself & really no two engineers agree on exactly which is the 'best' way.



    Conversely, pretty much any half decent piano 'rompler' will have had all that time & effort already spent on getting the sound right - you just have to pick the one you like best & suits the part best - something you also couldn't do with a single piano in a single room, even if you had all the rest of the expertise.



    Additionally, you can fix bum notes in midi without having to do re-takes until the performance is perfect.



    Go with a midi rompler & don't look back.



    If you ever get to re-record the piece at Abbey Road or Air Lyndhurst, forget all I've said & use their piano & engineers - & hire a pianist who can get it in one take. ;)






    share|improve this answer



























      1














      I think miking up a piano for the first time in your life, in a non-tuned room, is going to be several levels of hell harder than getting something acceptable out of a sample player.



      Piano recording is a whole study in itself & really no two engineers agree on exactly which is the 'best' way.



      Conversely, pretty much any half decent piano 'rompler' will have had all that time & effort already spent on getting the sound right - you just have to pick the one you like best & suits the part best - something you also couldn't do with a single piano in a single room, even if you had all the rest of the expertise.



      Additionally, you can fix bum notes in midi without having to do re-takes until the performance is perfect.



      Go with a midi rompler & don't look back.



      If you ever get to re-record the piece at Abbey Road or Air Lyndhurst, forget all I've said & use their piano & engineers - & hire a pianist who can get it in one take. ;)






      share|improve this answer

























        1












        1








        1







        I think miking up a piano for the first time in your life, in a non-tuned room, is going to be several levels of hell harder than getting something acceptable out of a sample player.



        Piano recording is a whole study in itself & really no two engineers agree on exactly which is the 'best' way.



        Conversely, pretty much any half decent piano 'rompler' will have had all that time & effort already spent on getting the sound right - you just have to pick the one you like best & suits the part best - something you also couldn't do with a single piano in a single room, even if you had all the rest of the expertise.



        Additionally, you can fix bum notes in midi without having to do re-takes until the performance is perfect.



        Go with a midi rompler & don't look back.



        If you ever get to re-record the piece at Abbey Road or Air Lyndhurst, forget all I've said & use their piano & engineers - & hire a pianist who can get it in one take. ;)






        share|improve this answer













        I think miking up a piano for the first time in your life, in a non-tuned room, is going to be several levels of hell harder than getting something acceptable out of a sample player.



        Piano recording is a whole study in itself & really no two engineers agree on exactly which is the 'best' way.



        Conversely, pretty much any half decent piano 'rompler' will have had all that time & effort already spent on getting the sound right - you just have to pick the one you like best & suits the part best - something you also couldn't do with a single piano in a single room, even if you had all the rest of the expertise.



        Additionally, you can fix bum notes in midi without having to do re-takes until the performance is perfect.



        Go with a midi rompler & don't look back.



        If you ever get to re-record the piece at Abbey Road or Air Lyndhurst, forget all I've said & use their piano & engineers - & hire a pianist who can get it in one take. ;)







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        TetsujinTetsujin

        8,34021934




        8,34021934



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f82562%2frecording-with-midi-synth-vs-actual-instrument%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -midi-controller-keyboard, production

            Popular posts from this blog

            Frič See also Navigation menuinternal link

            Identify plant with long narrow paired leaves and reddish stems Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?What is this plant with long sharp leaves? Is it a weed?What is this 3ft high, stalky plant, with mid sized narrow leaves?What is this young shrub with opposite ovate, crenate leaves and reddish stems?What is this plant with large broad serrated leaves?Identify this upright branching weed with long leaves and reddish stemsPlease help me identify this bulbous plant with long, broad leaves and white flowersWhat is this small annual with narrow gray/green leaves and rust colored daisy-type flowers?What is this chilli plant?Does anyone know what type of chilli plant this is?Help identify this plant

            fontconfig warning: “/etc/fonts/fonts.conf”, line 100: unknown “element blank” The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In“tar: unrecognized option --warning” during 'apt-get install'How to fix Fontconfig errorHow do I figure out which font file is chosen for a system generic font alias?Why are some apt-get-installed fonts being ignored by fc-list, xfontsel, etc?Reload settings in /etc/fonts/conf.dTaking 30 seconds longer to boot after upgrade from jessie to stretchHow to match multiple font names with a single <match> element?Adding a custom font to fontconfigRemoving fonts from fontconfig <match> resultsBroken fonts after upgrading Firefox ESR to latest Firefox