Confusion about non-derivable continuous functions The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAre there any implicit, continuous, non-differentiable functions?Logical Relations Between Three Statements about Continuous FunctionsCombination of continuous and discontinuous functionsIs there only one continuous-everywhere non-differentiable function?Intuition behind uniformly continuous functionsWhy weren't continuous functions defined as Darboux functions?Examples of functions that do not belong to any Baire classFind all continuous functions that satisfy the Jensen inequality(?) $f(fracx+y2)=fracf(x)+f(y)2$Confused About Limit Points and Closed SetsConfusion About Differentiability of Function

Why does the nucleus not repel itself?

Correct punctuation for showing a character's confusion

Pokemon Turn Based battle (Python)

Slides for 30 min~1 hr Skype tenure track application interview

Star Trek - X-shaped Item on Regula/Orbital Office Starbases

What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?

Dropping list elements from nested list after evaluation

Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric?

How to charge AirPods to keep battery healthy?

Does adding complexity mean a more secure cipher?

Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?

Is it possible for absolutely everyone to attain enlightenment?

Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit

Is it okay to consider publishing in my first year of PhD?

Why doesn't UInt have a toDouble()?

What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?

A word that means fill it to the required quantity

Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?

What is this business jet?

If I can cast sorceries at instant speed, can I use sorcery-speed activated abilities at instant speed?

Falsification in Math vs Science

Did any laptop computers have a built-in 5 1/4 inch floppy drive?

Old scifi movie from the 50s or 60s with men in solid red uniforms who interrogate a spy from the past

Why didn't the Event Horizon Telescope team mention Sagittarius A*?



Confusion about non-derivable continuous functions



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAre there any implicit, continuous, non-differentiable functions?Logical Relations Between Three Statements about Continuous FunctionsCombination of continuous and discontinuous functionsIs there only one continuous-everywhere non-differentiable function?Intuition behind uniformly continuous functionsWhy weren't continuous functions defined as Darboux functions?Examples of functions that do not belong to any Baire classFind all continuous functions that satisfy the Jensen inequality(?) $f(fracx+y2)=fracf(x)+f(y)2$Confused About Limit Points and Closed SetsConfusion About Differentiability of Function










3












$begingroup$


I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.



And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.



I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Where did you read that erroneous definition?
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
    $endgroup$
    – fazan
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @avs That is false.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @avs That is the definition of a continuously differentiable or $C^1$ function. Being differentiable is strictly weaker (not requiring that the derivatives be continuous).
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Furber
    2 days ago
















3












$begingroup$


I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.



And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.



I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Where did you read that erroneous definition?
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
    $endgroup$
    – fazan
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @avs That is false.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @avs That is the definition of a continuously differentiable or $C^1$ function. Being differentiable is strictly weaker (not requiring that the derivatives be continuous).
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Furber
    2 days ago














3












3








3


1



$begingroup$


I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.



And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.



I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.



And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.



I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.







real-analysis functions derivatives continuity






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 2 days ago









fazanfazan

608




608











  • $begingroup$
    For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Where did you read that erroneous definition?
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
    $endgroup$
    – fazan
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @avs That is false.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @avs That is the definition of a continuously differentiable or $C^1$ function. Being differentiable is strictly weaker (not requiring that the derivatives be continuous).
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Furber
    2 days ago

















  • $begingroup$
    For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Where did you read that erroneous definition?
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
    $endgroup$
    – fazan
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @avs That is false.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @avs That is the definition of a continuously differentiable or $C^1$ function. Being differentiable is strictly weaker (not requiring that the derivatives be continuous).
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Furber
    2 days ago
















$begingroup$
For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
2 days ago




$begingroup$
For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
2 days ago












$begingroup$
Where did you read that erroneous definition?
$endgroup$
– bof
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Where did you read that erroneous definition?
$endgroup$
– bof
2 days ago












$begingroup$
lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
$endgroup$
– fazan
2 days ago




$begingroup$
lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
$endgroup$
– fazan
2 days ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@avs That is false.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
2 days ago




$begingroup$
@avs That is false.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
2 days ago




2




2




$begingroup$
@avs That is the definition of a continuously differentiable or $C^1$ function. Being differentiable is strictly weaker (not requiring that the derivatives be continuous).
$endgroup$
– Robert Furber
2 days ago





$begingroup$
@avs That is the definition of a continuously differentiable or $C^1$ function. Being differentiable is strictly weaker (not requiring that the derivatives be continuous).
$endgroup$
– Robert Furber
2 days ago











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.



The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It is the definition of a continuously differentiable or $C^1$ function. This definition is important because $C^1$ functions on compact manifolds form Banach spaces, whereas differentiable functions do not.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Furber
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Here is the relevant wikipedia page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Furber
    yesterday


















1












$begingroup$

As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.



If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
$$f(x,y)=begincases(x^2+y^2)sin(frac1sqrtx^2+y^2) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)endcases$$
at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
    $endgroup$
    – Haris Gusic
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
    $endgroup$
    – K.Power
    2 days ago


















1












$begingroup$

Sounds like somebody got the wrong definition of what a "continuous function" is. Any function $f:mathbbRtomathbb R$ (like in your original post!) is continuous at any point $left(a,fleft(aright)right)$ for which $$limlimits_xto a^-fleft(xright)=limlimits_xto a^+fleft(xright)$$ (denoting the left and right-hand limits accordingly and provided both limits exist).



And finally, note that some functions can even be nowhere-continuous as well! Such as
$$fleft(xright)=left{beginmatrix1, xinmathbbQ\0,xnotinmathbb Qendmatrixright.$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3181529%2fconfusion-about-non-derivable-continuous-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.



    The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      It is the definition of a continuously differentiable or $C^1$ function. This definition is important because $C^1$ functions on compact manifolds form Banach spaces, whereas differentiable functions do not.
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Furber
      2 days ago










    • $begingroup$
      Here is the relevant wikipedia page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Furber
      yesterday















    4












    $begingroup$

    That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.



    The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      It is the definition of a continuously differentiable or $C^1$ function. This definition is important because $C^1$ functions on compact manifolds form Banach spaces, whereas differentiable functions do not.
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Furber
      2 days ago










    • $begingroup$
      Here is the relevant wikipedia page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Furber
      yesterday













    4












    4








    4





    $begingroup$

    That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.



    The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.



    The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 2 days ago

























    answered 2 days ago









    Haris GusicHaris Gusic

    3,546627




    3,546627











    • $begingroup$
      It is the definition of a continuously differentiable or $C^1$ function. This definition is important because $C^1$ functions on compact manifolds form Banach spaces, whereas differentiable functions do not.
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Furber
      2 days ago










    • $begingroup$
      Here is the relevant wikipedia page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Furber
      yesterday
















    • $begingroup$
      It is the definition of a continuously differentiable or $C^1$ function. This definition is important because $C^1$ functions on compact manifolds form Banach spaces, whereas differentiable functions do not.
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Furber
      2 days ago










    • $begingroup$
      Here is the relevant wikipedia page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Furber
      yesterday















    $begingroup$
    It is the definition of a continuously differentiable or $C^1$ function. This definition is important because $C^1$ functions on compact manifolds form Banach spaces, whereas differentiable functions do not.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Furber
    2 days ago




    $begingroup$
    It is the definition of a continuously differentiable or $C^1$ function. This definition is important because $C^1$ functions on compact manifolds form Banach spaces, whereas differentiable functions do not.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Furber
    2 days ago












    $begingroup$
    Here is the relevant wikipedia page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Furber
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    Here is the relevant wikipedia page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Furber
    yesterday











    1












    $begingroup$

    As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.



    If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
    $$f(x,y)=begincases(x^2+y^2)sin(frac1sqrtx^2+y^2) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)endcases$$
    at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
      $endgroup$
      – Haris Gusic
      2 days ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
      $endgroup$
      – K.Power
      2 days ago















    1












    $begingroup$

    As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.



    If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
    $$f(x,y)=begincases(x^2+y^2)sin(frac1sqrtx^2+y^2) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)endcases$$
    at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
      $endgroup$
      – Haris Gusic
      2 days ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
      $endgroup$
      – K.Power
      2 days ago













    1












    1








    1





    $begingroup$

    As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.



    If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
    $$f(x,y)=begincases(x^2+y^2)sin(frac1sqrtx^2+y^2) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)endcases$$
    at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.



    If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
    $$f(x,y)=begincases(x^2+y^2)sin(frac1sqrtx^2+y^2) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)endcases$$
    at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 2 days ago

























    answered 2 days ago









    K.PowerK.Power

    3,709926




    3,709926











    • $begingroup$
      The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
      $endgroup$
      – Haris Gusic
      2 days ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
      $endgroup$
      – K.Power
      2 days ago
















    • $begingroup$
      The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
      $endgroup$
      – Haris Gusic
      2 days ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
      $endgroup$
      – K.Power
      2 days ago















    $begingroup$
    The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
    $endgroup$
    – Haris Gusic
    2 days ago




    $begingroup$
    The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
    $endgroup$
    – Haris Gusic
    2 days ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
    $endgroup$
    – K.Power
    2 days ago




    $begingroup$
    @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
    $endgroup$
    – K.Power
    2 days ago











    1












    $begingroup$

    Sounds like somebody got the wrong definition of what a "continuous function" is. Any function $f:mathbbRtomathbb R$ (like in your original post!) is continuous at any point $left(a,fleft(aright)right)$ for which $$limlimits_xto a^-fleft(xright)=limlimits_xto a^+fleft(xright)$$ (denoting the left and right-hand limits accordingly and provided both limits exist).



    And finally, note that some functions can even be nowhere-continuous as well! Such as
    $$fleft(xright)=left{beginmatrix1, xinmathbbQ\0,xnotinmathbb Qendmatrixright.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      1












      $begingroup$

      Sounds like somebody got the wrong definition of what a "continuous function" is. Any function $f:mathbbRtomathbb R$ (like in your original post!) is continuous at any point $left(a,fleft(aright)right)$ for which $$limlimits_xto a^-fleft(xright)=limlimits_xto a^+fleft(xright)$$ (denoting the left and right-hand limits accordingly and provided both limits exist).



      And finally, note that some functions can even be nowhere-continuous as well! Such as
      $$fleft(xright)=left{beginmatrix1, xinmathbbQ\0,xnotinmathbb Qendmatrixright.$$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Sounds like somebody got the wrong definition of what a "continuous function" is. Any function $f:mathbbRtomathbb R$ (like in your original post!) is continuous at any point $left(a,fleft(aright)right)$ for which $$limlimits_xto a^-fleft(xright)=limlimits_xto a^+fleft(xright)$$ (denoting the left and right-hand limits accordingly and provided both limits exist).



        And finally, note that some functions can even be nowhere-continuous as well! Such as
        $$fleft(xright)=left{beginmatrix1, xinmathbbQ\0,xnotinmathbb Qendmatrixright.$$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Sounds like somebody got the wrong definition of what a "continuous function" is. Any function $f:mathbbRtomathbb R$ (like in your original post!) is continuous at any point $left(a,fleft(aright)right)$ for which $$limlimits_xto a^-fleft(xright)=limlimits_xto a^+fleft(xright)$$ (denoting the left and right-hand limits accordingly and provided both limits exist).



        And finally, note that some functions can even be nowhere-continuous as well! Such as
        $$fleft(xright)=left{beginmatrix1, xinmathbbQ\0,xnotinmathbb Qendmatrixright.$$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited yesterday









        avs

        4,203515




        4,203515










        answered 2 days ago









        ManRowManRow

        25618




        25618



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3181529%2fconfusion-about-non-derivable-continuous-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -continuity, derivatives, functions, real-analysis

            Popular posts from this blog

            Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god existsWord for having a definite opinion while simultaneously withholding judgment?What's the opposite of “newcomer? Is ”veteran" OK?What do you call an “atheist” who might believe in an afterlife?What's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Word for someone who dismisses contrary opinions as irrational?Somone who thinks they are overly special/out of the ordinaryIs there a word, phrase or idiom for “a person who is incapable of thinking about the future”?The belief that a god is human-likeA word for a non-famous person/thing you have heard a lot aboutAdjective for a person who enjoys taking care of their appearance

            2017 IndyCar Series Contents Series news Teams and drivers Schedule Season summary Footnotes References External links Navigation menu"INDYCAR: Initial 2018 bodywork concepts unveiled"the original"IndyCar confirms switch to Performance Friction brakes in 2017""AJ Foyt Racing will switch to Chevy"the original"Carlos Munoz, Conor Daly will drive for AJ Foyt Racing""Zach Veach's Indy 500 Debut Confirmed with Foyt""No mass exodus from Honda after Ganassi switch""Ex-F1 driver Sato joins Andretti Autosport for 2017 IndyCar season""IndyCar's Ryan Hunter-Reay, sponsor DHL paired through 2020""hhgregg and Andretti Autosport announce partnership for key races in 2016""INDYCAR: Rossi re-signs with Andretti"the original"McLaren Formula 1 - Fernando Alonso to race at Indy 500 with McLaren, Honda and Andretti Autosport""Shank will finally take part in Indy 500 with Harvey, Andretti | MotorSportsTalk""Andretti adds Jack Harvey to Indy 500 field""Ganassi switches to Honda power for 2017""INDYCAR: Chilton returns to Ganassi"the original"IndyCar silly season: Who's going where in 2017?""INDYCAR: Kanaan, NTT Data return to Ganassi"the original"Kimball to remain at Ganassi for 2017""Coyne confirms Bourdais for 2017 IndyCar season""Davison to sub for Bourdais in Indy 500"the original"Gutierrez confirmed for Detroit IndyCar debut""Gutierrez returns with Coyne for rest of 2017 season""Vautier to drive for Coyne at Texas"the original"INDYCAR: Coyne confirms Jones for 2017"the original"Pippa Mann returns to Coyne for Indy 500""Karam, Dreyer & Reinbold teaming up again for Indianapolis 500""Pigot to return to Ed Carpenter Racing""Hildebrand confirmed as full-time Ed Carpenter driver""Veach to replace injured Hildebrand at Barber"the originalNew Team Harding Racing Enters Chaves for 101st Indianapolis 500"Juncos Racing Announces Entry in 101st Running of the Indianapolis 500 :: Juncos Racing""Juncos confirms Pigot for Indy 500""Saavedra confirmed in Juncos' second 500 entry"the original"Lazier confirms Indy 500 run after son's USF2000 debut"the original"Claman DeMelo to race for RLLR at Sonoma"the original"Rahal signs Servia and ace engineer for 2017""IndyCar: Aleshin returns with Schmidt"the original"Aleshin replaced by Saavedra for Toronto""Jack Harvey will pilot SPM No. 7 car at Watkins Glen, Sonoma""Jay Howard confirmed in Tony Stewart's supported SPM Indy entry""INDYCAR: Newgarden to wave the flag at Penske"the original"Pagenaud opts for No. 1 in 2017"the original"Penske confirms Newgarden for 2017""Montoya to stay with Team Penske in 2017""Target leaving IndyCar after 27 seasons with Chip Ganassi""Cavin: IndyCar could see complete driver/team shakeup in 2017""End of the road for KV Racing?""KV Racing confirms closure, equipment sold to Juncos""Juncos confirms IndyCar Series entry"the original"Juncos readies IndyCar program, aims for '17 500"the original"Harding Racing to add Texas, Pocono to schedule"the original"Sato signs with Andretti Autosport for 2017""INDYCAR: Aleshin in Doubt at SPM"the original"Long Beach notebook: JR Hildebrand breaks hand""Hildebrand cleared to return at Phoenix"the original"Bourdais to undergo surgery on multiple fractures""Aleshin loses Schmidt Peterson IndyCar ride""Saavedra in at SPM for Pocono, Gateway"the original"Bourdais to make return at Gateway"the original"The IndyCar Grand Prix no longer is sponsored by Angie's List""2017 IndyCar Series rulebook""2017 Verizon IndyCar Series Official Rulebook"Official websiteeeeee

            What was this official D&D 3.5e Lovecraft-flavored rulebook?What was this set of RPG tools called?As a first-time DM should I let my players play complex character classes and roles?Nymph's Kiss and the RelationshipWhat was the name of this Cleric Prestige Class that shapes metal with its bare hands?Are the 3.5e Dragonlance books third party or official works?What's up with the domain Vile Darkness?What was this 80s book about RPGs?What was the name of this Werewolf band?What book had Rituals to “upgrade” animal companions to keep them viable at higher levels?What was this RPG that had rules for player-owned businesses?