Is there a general name for the setup in which payoffs are not known exactly but players try to influence each other's perception of the payoffs? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InOsborne, Nash equilibria and the correctness of beliefsIs there a name for this family of games (Binomial games?)?Perfect Bayesian EquilibriumCalculating mixed strategy equilibrium in battle of sexesPure Strategy SPNEIs there a commitment mechanism which allows players to achieve pareto optimal solutions?Extensive Form GamesAn $n$-player prisoner's dilemma where a coalition of 2 players is better off defectingTit-For-Stat Strategy Best RepliesPotential solutions of the $n$-player Prisoner's Dilemma

Did any laptop computers have a built-in 5 1/4 inch floppy drive?

What is this business jet?

Why doesn't shell automatically fix "useless use of cat"?

Correct punctuation for showing a character's confusion

What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?

How to type a long/em dash `—`

Why couldn't they take pictures of a closer black hole?

Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?

Did Scotland spend $250,000 for the slogan "Welcome to Scotland"?

Mathematics of imaging the black hole

Is bread bad for ducks?

Finding the area between two curves with Integrate

Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?

Geography at the pixel level

Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?

"as much details as you can remember"

How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure

Falsification in Math vs Science

Output the Arecibo Message

Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit

A word that means fill it to the required quantity

Is there a way to generate a uniformly distributed point on a sphere from a fixed amount of random real numbers?

How to quickly solve partial fractions equation?

Why didn't the Event Horizon Telescope team mention Sagittarius A*?



Is there a general name for the setup in which payoffs are not known exactly but players try to influence each other's perception of the payoffs?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InOsborne, Nash equilibria and the correctness of beliefsIs there a name for this family of games (Binomial games?)?Perfect Bayesian EquilibriumCalculating mixed strategy equilibrium in battle of sexesPure Strategy SPNEIs there a commitment mechanism which allows players to achieve pareto optimal solutions?Extensive Form GamesAn $n$-player prisoner's dilemma where a coalition of 2 players is better off defectingTit-For-Stat Strategy Best RepliesPotential solutions of the $n$-player Prisoner's Dilemma










5












$begingroup$


A recent question elsewhere made me look at the "madman strategy" which actually consists of trying to make the opposite player think that he is playing a game of chicken instead of prisoner's dilemma. This can only work, of course, because in reality the payoffs are not known apriori, so an inversion of the non-cooperation payoff with the "tentation" payoff does this game switch.



Is there a general name for a "meta-game" (my term) situation in which the payoffs are not known exactly and players are trying to influence each others' perception of the payoffs?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    5












    $begingroup$


    A recent question elsewhere made me look at the "madman strategy" which actually consists of trying to make the opposite player think that he is playing a game of chicken instead of prisoner's dilemma. This can only work, of course, because in reality the payoffs are not known apriori, so an inversion of the non-cooperation payoff with the "tentation" payoff does this game switch.



    Is there a general name for a "meta-game" (my term) situation in which the payoffs are not known exactly and players are trying to influence each others' perception of the payoffs?










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      5












      5








      5


      1



      $begingroup$


      A recent question elsewhere made me look at the "madman strategy" which actually consists of trying to make the opposite player think that he is playing a game of chicken instead of prisoner's dilemma. This can only work, of course, because in reality the payoffs are not known apriori, so an inversion of the non-cooperation payoff with the "tentation" payoff does this game switch.



      Is there a general name for a "meta-game" (my term) situation in which the payoffs are not known exactly and players are trying to influence each others' perception of the payoffs?










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      A recent question elsewhere made me look at the "madman strategy" which actually consists of trying to make the opposite player think that he is playing a game of chicken instead of prisoner's dilemma. This can only work, of course, because in reality the payoffs are not known apriori, so an inversion of the non-cooperation payoff with the "tentation" payoff does this game switch.



      Is there a general name for a "meta-game" (my term) situation in which the payoffs are not known exactly and players are trying to influence each others' perception of the payoffs?







      game-theory terminology






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked yesterday









      FizzFizz

      603313




      603313




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          What players are trying to do is always up for interpretation, it is not coded into the mathematics of game theory.



          The madman strategy can be modelled as a Bayesian game, with different types having different payoffs, and one player sending a signal about their type, the other player observing the signal. A situation in which types are indistinguishable based on their signals is called a pooling equilibrium.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I've accepted your answer but I do ponder if the assumption of nature move establishing the players' types (and with a common prior knowledge of those type assignment probabilities) is really capturing all I'm asking about. I'm guessing that players sending each other signals about their types prior to playing the actual game make this a 3-step game (instead of just nature move followed by a static game).
            $endgroup$
            – Fizz
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            This is possible in Bayesian games, there can be many steps. For an example see Kuhn poker.
            $endgroup$
            – Giskard
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            Actually it looks like the narrowest fitting type is called signalling game, although in that one only one of the players (the "sender") chooses [and sends] a message after being dealt a type by nature.
            $endgroup$
            – Fizz
            yesterday











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "591"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2feconomics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f27722%2fis-there-a-general-name-for-the-setup-in-which-payoffs-are-not-known-exactly-but%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5












          $begingroup$

          What players are trying to do is always up for interpretation, it is not coded into the mathematics of game theory.



          The madman strategy can be modelled as a Bayesian game, with different types having different payoffs, and one player sending a signal about their type, the other player observing the signal. A situation in which types are indistinguishable based on their signals is called a pooling equilibrium.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I've accepted your answer but I do ponder if the assumption of nature move establishing the players' types (and with a common prior knowledge of those type assignment probabilities) is really capturing all I'm asking about. I'm guessing that players sending each other signals about their types prior to playing the actual game make this a 3-step game (instead of just nature move followed by a static game).
            $endgroup$
            – Fizz
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            This is possible in Bayesian games, there can be many steps. For an example see Kuhn poker.
            $endgroup$
            – Giskard
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            Actually it looks like the narrowest fitting type is called signalling game, although in that one only one of the players (the "sender") chooses [and sends] a message after being dealt a type by nature.
            $endgroup$
            – Fizz
            yesterday















          5












          $begingroup$

          What players are trying to do is always up for interpretation, it is not coded into the mathematics of game theory.



          The madman strategy can be modelled as a Bayesian game, with different types having different payoffs, and one player sending a signal about their type, the other player observing the signal. A situation in which types are indistinguishable based on their signals is called a pooling equilibrium.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I've accepted your answer but I do ponder if the assumption of nature move establishing the players' types (and with a common prior knowledge of those type assignment probabilities) is really capturing all I'm asking about. I'm guessing that players sending each other signals about their types prior to playing the actual game make this a 3-step game (instead of just nature move followed by a static game).
            $endgroup$
            – Fizz
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            This is possible in Bayesian games, there can be many steps. For an example see Kuhn poker.
            $endgroup$
            – Giskard
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            Actually it looks like the narrowest fitting type is called signalling game, although in that one only one of the players (the "sender") chooses [and sends] a message after being dealt a type by nature.
            $endgroup$
            – Fizz
            yesterday













          5












          5








          5





          $begingroup$

          What players are trying to do is always up for interpretation, it is not coded into the mathematics of game theory.



          The madman strategy can be modelled as a Bayesian game, with different types having different payoffs, and one player sending a signal about their type, the other player observing the signal. A situation in which types are indistinguishable based on their signals is called a pooling equilibrium.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          What players are trying to do is always up for interpretation, it is not coded into the mathematics of game theory.



          The madman strategy can be modelled as a Bayesian game, with different types having different payoffs, and one player sending a signal about their type, the other player observing the signal. A situation in which types are indistinguishable based on their signals is called a pooling equilibrium.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          GiskardGiskard

          13.6k32248




          13.6k32248











          • $begingroup$
            I've accepted your answer but I do ponder if the assumption of nature move establishing the players' types (and with a common prior knowledge of those type assignment probabilities) is really capturing all I'm asking about. I'm guessing that players sending each other signals about their types prior to playing the actual game make this a 3-step game (instead of just nature move followed by a static game).
            $endgroup$
            – Fizz
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            This is possible in Bayesian games, there can be many steps. For an example see Kuhn poker.
            $endgroup$
            – Giskard
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            Actually it looks like the narrowest fitting type is called signalling game, although in that one only one of the players (the "sender") chooses [and sends] a message after being dealt a type by nature.
            $endgroup$
            – Fizz
            yesterday
















          • $begingroup$
            I've accepted your answer but I do ponder if the assumption of nature move establishing the players' types (and with a common prior knowledge of those type assignment probabilities) is really capturing all I'm asking about. I'm guessing that players sending each other signals about their types prior to playing the actual game make this a 3-step game (instead of just nature move followed by a static game).
            $endgroup$
            – Fizz
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            This is possible in Bayesian games, there can be many steps. For an example see Kuhn poker.
            $endgroup$
            – Giskard
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            Actually it looks like the narrowest fitting type is called signalling game, although in that one only one of the players (the "sender") chooses [and sends] a message after being dealt a type by nature.
            $endgroup$
            – Fizz
            yesterday















          $begingroup$
          I've accepted your answer but I do ponder if the assumption of nature move establishing the players' types (and with a common prior knowledge of those type assignment probabilities) is really capturing all I'm asking about. I'm guessing that players sending each other signals about their types prior to playing the actual game make this a 3-step game (instead of just nature move followed by a static game).
          $endgroup$
          – Fizz
          yesterday





          $begingroup$
          I've accepted your answer but I do ponder if the assumption of nature move establishing the players' types (and with a common prior knowledge of those type assignment probabilities) is really capturing all I'm asking about. I'm guessing that players sending each other signals about their types prior to playing the actual game make this a 3-step game (instead of just nature move followed by a static game).
          $endgroup$
          – Fizz
          yesterday













          $begingroup$
          This is possible in Bayesian games, there can be many steps. For an example see Kuhn poker.
          $endgroup$
          – Giskard
          yesterday




          $begingroup$
          This is possible in Bayesian games, there can be many steps. For an example see Kuhn poker.
          $endgroup$
          – Giskard
          yesterday












          $begingroup$
          Actually it looks like the narrowest fitting type is called signalling game, although in that one only one of the players (the "sender") chooses [and sends] a message after being dealt a type by nature.
          $endgroup$
          – Fizz
          yesterday




          $begingroup$
          Actually it looks like the narrowest fitting type is called signalling game, although in that one only one of the players (the "sender") chooses [and sends] a message after being dealt a type by nature.
          $endgroup$
          – Fizz
          yesterday

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Economics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2feconomics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f27722%2fis-there-a-general-name-for-the-setup-in-which-payoffs-are-not-known-exactly-but%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -game-theory, terminology

          Popular posts from this blog

          Frič See also Navigation menuinternal link

          Identify plant with long narrow paired leaves and reddish stems Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?What is this plant with long sharp leaves? Is it a weed?What is this 3ft high, stalky plant, with mid sized narrow leaves?What is this young shrub with opposite ovate, crenate leaves and reddish stems?What is this plant with large broad serrated leaves?Identify this upright branching weed with long leaves and reddish stemsPlease help me identify this bulbous plant with long, broad leaves and white flowersWhat is this small annual with narrow gray/green leaves and rust colored daisy-type flowers?What is this chilli plant?Does anyone know what type of chilli plant this is?Help identify this plant

          fontconfig warning: “/etc/fonts/fonts.conf”, line 100: unknown “element blank” The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In“tar: unrecognized option --warning” during 'apt-get install'How to fix Fontconfig errorHow do I figure out which font file is chosen for a system generic font alias?Why are some apt-get-installed fonts being ignored by fc-list, xfontsel, etc?Reload settings in /etc/fonts/conf.dTaking 30 seconds longer to boot after upgrade from jessie to stretchHow to match multiple font names with a single <match> element?Adding a custom font to fontconfigRemoving fonts from fontconfig <match> resultsBroken fonts after upgrading Firefox ESR to latest Firefox