Protecting Dualbooting Windows from dangerous code (like rm -rf) The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHowto mount drive as read-only with fstabHow to prepare HDD for Windows 8 install?dualboot windows 8 and ubuntu on seprate hddProtecting Live USB from Windows VirusesWill Partitioning My SSD For Dual Boot Cause A Performance Drop? Tips?What does “unmount” mean in terms of partitions?Dual boot with different disksMouse and keyboard issues when dualbooting Ubuntu and Windows 10Error mounting in Ubuntu and Unmountable boot volume in WindowsIs dual-boot Windows 10 with hibernation and Ubunutu 18.04 dangerous?Installed Windows 10 on a new SSD and now I can't access my old HDD with Linux on it

How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?

Worn-tile Scrabble

Is it safe to harvest rainwater that fell on solar panels?

What do these terms in Caesar's Gallic Wars mean?

How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?

How can I have a shield and a way of attacking with a ranged weapon at the same time?

Match Roman Numerals

writing variables above the numbers in tikz picture

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

Why are there uneven bright areas in this photo of black hole?

Accepted by European university, rejected by all American ones I applied to? Possible reasons?

How do I free up internal storage if I don't have any apps downloaded?

Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?

Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?

Does HR tell a hiring manager about salary negotiations?

How to obtain a position of last non-zero element

Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?

Why couldn't they take pictures of a closer black hole?

Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?

Falsification in Math vs Science

What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?

Mathematics of imaging the black hole

"as much details as you can remember"

Why didn't the Event Horizon Telescope team mention Sagittarius A*?



Protecting Dualbooting Windows from dangerous code (like rm -rf)



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHowto mount drive as read-only with fstabHow to prepare HDD for Windows 8 install?dualboot windows 8 and ubuntu on seprate hddProtecting Live USB from Windows VirusesWill Partitioning My SSD For Dual Boot Cause A Performance Drop? Tips?What does “unmount” mean in terms of partitions?Dual boot with different disksMouse and keyboard issues when dualbooting Ubuntu and Windows 10Error mounting in Ubuntu and Unmountable boot volume in WindowsIs dual-boot Windows 10 with hibernation and Ubunutu 18.04 dangerous?Installed Windows 10 on a new SSD and now I can't access my old HDD with Linux on it



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








15















I'm thinking of dualbooting Windows 10 and Ubuntu in different partitions of the same SSD. If codes like rm -rf somehow happens in the Ubuntu partition, does this affect Windows, or does it leave other partitions alone? And if it DOES affect the Windows partition, how can I prevent this from happening?










share|improve this question







New contributor




K. Paul is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 3





    Take backups (which you should be doing anyway!)

    – pjc50
    yesterday






  • 2





    Everybody is worried about this, but I suggest you spin up a Docker container and try it out. Most Linux distros will make you answer yes and enter a password to do something truly dumb

    – bremen_matt
    yesterday


















15















I'm thinking of dualbooting Windows 10 and Ubuntu in different partitions of the same SSD. If codes like rm -rf somehow happens in the Ubuntu partition, does this affect Windows, or does it leave other partitions alone? And if it DOES affect the Windows partition, how can I prevent this from happening?










share|improve this question







New contributor




K. Paul is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 3





    Take backups (which you should be doing anyway!)

    – pjc50
    yesterday






  • 2





    Everybody is worried about this, but I suggest you spin up a Docker container and try it out. Most Linux distros will make you answer yes and enter a password to do something truly dumb

    – bremen_matt
    yesterday














15












15








15








I'm thinking of dualbooting Windows 10 and Ubuntu in different partitions of the same SSD. If codes like rm -rf somehow happens in the Ubuntu partition, does this affect Windows, or does it leave other partitions alone? And if it DOES affect the Windows partition, how can I prevent this from happening?










share|improve this question







New contributor




K. Paul is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I'm thinking of dualbooting Windows 10 and Ubuntu in different partitions of the same SSD. If codes like rm -rf somehow happens in the Ubuntu partition, does this affect Windows, or does it leave other partitions alone? And if it DOES affect the Windows partition, how can I prevent this from happening?







dual-boot partitioning 18.04 windows-10






share|improve this question







New contributor




K. Paul is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




K. Paul is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




K. Paul is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









K. PaulK. Paul

787




787




New contributor




K. Paul is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





K. Paul is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






K. Paul is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 3





    Take backups (which you should be doing anyway!)

    – pjc50
    yesterday






  • 2





    Everybody is worried about this, but I suggest you spin up a Docker container and try it out. Most Linux distros will make you answer yes and enter a password to do something truly dumb

    – bremen_matt
    yesterday













  • 3





    Take backups (which you should be doing anyway!)

    – pjc50
    yesterday






  • 2





    Everybody is worried about this, but I suggest you spin up a Docker container and try it out. Most Linux distros will make you answer yes and enter a password to do something truly dumb

    – bremen_matt
    yesterday








3




3





Take backups (which you should be doing anyway!)

– pjc50
yesterday





Take backups (which you should be doing anyway!)

– pjc50
yesterday




2




2





Everybody is worried about this, but I suggest you spin up a Docker container and try it out. Most Linux distros will make you answer yes and enter a password to do something truly dumb

– bremen_matt
yesterday






Everybody is worried about this, but I suggest you spin up a Docker container and try it out. Most Linux distros will make you answer yes and enter a password to do something truly dumb

– bremen_matt
yesterday











4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















13














If you have physical access to a computer, you have the power to do anything with the files on it, including reading, corrupting or deleting them.



It's possible to make it harder to accidentally delete files, though.



If you want to read documents on your Windows 10 partition, you could mount the partition in read-only mode. You won't be able to edit Word documents, but it should be enough if you want to read PDF, listen to MP3's or watch movies on your Windows partition. Another possibility would be to create a FAT32 D: partition under Windows, which you would mount with write permissions under Ubuntu.



I could think of at least 5 short commands to destroy a Windows Partition from a Linux system, but they would all require root privileges. Be careful whenever you want to run a command starting with sudo or when a program tells you that "Authentication is required to run".



Finally, be very careful when installing Ubuntu along Windows. The installer makes it clear which partitions are resized, created or deleted but it's still possible to delete existing partitions if you ignore the warnings long enough.



To be safe, please follow @Emmet's excellent advice (be sure to backup your data).






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    There is an equal amount of Windows commands that can damage an Ubuntu partition.

    – Brilsmurfffje
    yesterday







  • 3





    @Brilsmurfffje: Sure, it's possible to damage an Ubuntu partition from Windows. Still, Ubuntu is usually installed after Windows, it's easier to mount NTFS in Ubuntu than Ext4 in Windows and command lines are more prevalent in Ubuntu than in Windows.

    – Eric Duminil
    yesterday






  • 2





    Whenever I've dual-booted Win/Lin, I would create a FAT32 partition that appears as D: in Windows, and use it to pass anything between the OSes. I simply do not trust Windows accessing ext3/4 or Linux accessing NTFS, with write privileges.

    – Monty Harder
    yesterday






  • 1





    If you have physical access to a computer, you have the power to do anything with the files on it, including reading, corrupting or deleting them." I feel like you threw in "reading" a bit too quickly, considering encryption is a thing...

    – Mehrdad
    yesterday











  • @Mehrdad: You're right. I couldn't find a way to mention encrypted files in this sentence, because you can corrupt or delete them even if you cannot decrypt the content.

    – Eric Duminil
    13 hours ago


















10














The common basic to prevent data-loss: REMEMBER TO ALWAYS TAKE BACKUP OF YOUR FILES



It doesn't affect the windows partition, because you're running it from your Ubuntu machine.



Picture it like this



/dev/sda1 ntfs-bootfile
/dev/sda2 ntfs-win
/dev/sda5 ext4-root --> (YOUR LOCATION NOW)
/dev/sda6 ext4-swap


If you run rm -rf within your location, it would affect sda5 partition—in which your Ubuntu system reside. So it only affect Ubuntu.



Supposing you have grub boot loader to load the 2 OS (Ubuntu and Windows), if you accidentally remove GRUB file aswell, Windows would not be able to boot, but the data inside will remain intact.



However, Ubuntu tend to mount Windows partition when it available, and if you say ran rm -rf /*, Ubuntu—without hesitate will delete ALL file, this include Windows partition.



There's also infamous dd command, hence the disk destroyer nickname. This is widely used to: formatting drive, cloning disk, creating bootable usb etc.



dd has ability to dump entire main drive, dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda would replacing all data on main drive with zero—and goodbye to our data !



With that being said, please be very careful when running command and always take a second look before doing execute something—it's best to prevent disaster before it happens.



I highly recommend you to learn various Linux command, this way you could tell what does the command do before you ran it.



Also, again please be elaborate when working with dd, it's common mistake to mistype sdb to sda, anything happens after that is horrible.






share|improve this answer




















  • 12





    The OP asks about "codes like rm -rf." To me, this means the various destructive commands that can be done on a Linux system. Some of these will cause problems on Windows. For example cat /dev/zero > /dev/sda will write zeroes to all of /dev/sda, thus deleting all data on that drive and possibly the entire computer. Of course, such things are less likely in practice but they need to be acknowledged for a complete answer. If truly secure isolation is needed to prevent Linux from causing problems on Windows (or visa-versa), the only sufficient method is a virtual machine of some sort.

    – john01dav
    yesterday







  • 2





    Also, the windows partition could be mounted in /media or /mnt. In that case, rm -rf would surely be able to destroy windows files.

    – Eric Duminil
    yesterday






  • 4





    This answer is incorrect if the Windows partition is mounted in Ubuntu! If, say, the Windows filesystem is mounted under /mnt, and you run rm -rf /*, it's bye bye Windows files...

    – marcelm
    yesterday






  • 4





    @wizzwizz4 "No, they'll be deleted afterwards". It depends on how the "*" expands, usually in alphabetic order, so "/bin" before "/mnt". But in fact, the order does not matter, because, as you already said, "rm" already resides in memory, and this is the only thing that matters.

    – rexkogitans
    yesterday






  • 2





    @EricDuminil Assuming that the system isn't swapping, as soon as rm opens all the libraries it needs, it will not matter if those libraries are deleted from the file system. They will stay on disk, unlinked but still open by rm. What will likely cause a problem is when the OS tries to fire up a new process that needs a file or device that has already been deleted. You might panic the system at that point.

    – Doug O'Neal
    yesterday


















1














If the fact that you can't keep two operating systems on one disk from harming one another makes you look for other solutions, here more options. They depend on your practical needs and your budget.



You can run one (or both) systems as virtual machines instead of using separate partitions. The virtual machine should have limited access to the host or other virtual machine, so you cannot accidentally damage the host machine (though there will still be deliberate ways). Another advantage is that you can use both at the same time.



If you want your two operating systems completely separate, put them on swappable hard disks or even better, separate computers (less chance to accidentally destroy your disks).



If you need to be able to access the data but very often do the kind of stuff on your Linux which can harm the Windows system accidentally with a small lapse, put them on different machines and access Windows only through a remote access tool which respects the Windows security mechanisms. You'll get full access to your data and very high security at the price of a few hundred Euro/USD for extra hardware. Additionally, you have a backup system if one fails, so if you work on these machines, the extra cost can pay off.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Carl Dombrowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



























    0














    Risks like this can be easily mitigated by enabling BitLocker drive encryption on the Windows10 operating system. Encrypting the partition makes it for Ubuntu unable to mount and thus perform actions like rm -r



    It also means that you are unable to share files with the ubuntu system via the windows partition.



    If you would like to share data between the two operating systems I would advise you to create a separate data partition which you mount on both operating systems.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 5





      Being unable to mount a file system does not make Ubuntu unable to damage it. dd could still overwrite relevant sectors of the disk used by windows, making the encrypted file system permanently unrecoverable.

      – Patrick Trentin
      yesterday







    • 2





      @PatrickTrentin: Indeed. You may not be able to read any meaningful content from Windows partition, but cat, dd, fdisk, parted, or mkfs.ntfs will all happily destroy any data on the partition, encrypted or not.

      – Eric Duminil
      yesterday












    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "89"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    K. Paul is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1132599%2fprotecting-dualbooting-windows-from-dangerous-code-like-rm-rf%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    13














    If you have physical access to a computer, you have the power to do anything with the files on it, including reading, corrupting or deleting them.



    It's possible to make it harder to accidentally delete files, though.



    If you want to read documents on your Windows 10 partition, you could mount the partition in read-only mode. You won't be able to edit Word documents, but it should be enough if you want to read PDF, listen to MP3's or watch movies on your Windows partition. Another possibility would be to create a FAT32 D: partition under Windows, which you would mount with write permissions under Ubuntu.



    I could think of at least 5 short commands to destroy a Windows Partition from a Linux system, but they would all require root privileges. Be careful whenever you want to run a command starting with sudo or when a program tells you that "Authentication is required to run".



    Finally, be very careful when installing Ubuntu along Windows. The installer makes it clear which partitions are resized, created or deleted but it's still possible to delete existing partitions if you ignore the warnings long enough.



    To be safe, please follow @Emmet's excellent advice (be sure to backup your data).






    share|improve this answer




















    • 2





      There is an equal amount of Windows commands that can damage an Ubuntu partition.

      – Brilsmurfffje
      yesterday







    • 3





      @Brilsmurfffje: Sure, it's possible to damage an Ubuntu partition from Windows. Still, Ubuntu is usually installed after Windows, it's easier to mount NTFS in Ubuntu than Ext4 in Windows and command lines are more prevalent in Ubuntu than in Windows.

      – Eric Duminil
      yesterday






    • 2





      Whenever I've dual-booted Win/Lin, I would create a FAT32 partition that appears as D: in Windows, and use it to pass anything between the OSes. I simply do not trust Windows accessing ext3/4 or Linux accessing NTFS, with write privileges.

      – Monty Harder
      yesterday






    • 1





      If you have physical access to a computer, you have the power to do anything with the files on it, including reading, corrupting or deleting them." I feel like you threw in "reading" a bit too quickly, considering encryption is a thing...

      – Mehrdad
      yesterday











    • @Mehrdad: You're right. I couldn't find a way to mention encrypted files in this sentence, because you can corrupt or delete them even if you cannot decrypt the content.

      – Eric Duminil
      13 hours ago















    13














    If you have physical access to a computer, you have the power to do anything with the files on it, including reading, corrupting or deleting them.



    It's possible to make it harder to accidentally delete files, though.



    If you want to read documents on your Windows 10 partition, you could mount the partition in read-only mode. You won't be able to edit Word documents, but it should be enough if you want to read PDF, listen to MP3's or watch movies on your Windows partition. Another possibility would be to create a FAT32 D: partition under Windows, which you would mount with write permissions under Ubuntu.



    I could think of at least 5 short commands to destroy a Windows Partition from a Linux system, but they would all require root privileges. Be careful whenever you want to run a command starting with sudo or when a program tells you that "Authentication is required to run".



    Finally, be very careful when installing Ubuntu along Windows. The installer makes it clear which partitions are resized, created or deleted but it's still possible to delete existing partitions if you ignore the warnings long enough.



    To be safe, please follow @Emmet's excellent advice (be sure to backup your data).






    share|improve this answer




















    • 2





      There is an equal amount of Windows commands that can damage an Ubuntu partition.

      – Brilsmurfffje
      yesterday







    • 3





      @Brilsmurfffje: Sure, it's possible to damage an Ubuntu partition from Windows. Still, Ubuntu is usually installed after Windows, it's easier to mount NTFS in Ubuntu than Ext4 in Windows and command lines are more prevalent in Ubuntu than in Windows.

      – Eric Duminil
      yesterday






    • 2





      Whenever I've dual-booted Win/Lin, I would create a FAT32 partition that appears as D: in Windows, and use it to pass anything between the OSes. I simply do not trust Windows accessing ext3/4 or Linux accessing NTFS, with write privileges.

      – Monty Harder
      yesterday






    • 1





      If you have physical access to a computer, you have the power to do anything with the files on it, including reading, corrupting or deleting them." I feel like you threw in "reading" a bit too quickly, considering encryption is a thing...

      – Mehrdad
      yesterday











    • @Mehrdad: You're right. I couldn't find a way to mention encrypted files in this sentence, because you can corrupt or delete them even if you cannot decrypt the content.

      – Eric Duminil
      13 hours ago













    13












    13








    13







    If you have physical access to a computer, you have the power to do anything with the files on it, including reading, corrupting or deleting them.



    It's possible to make it harder to accidentally delete files, though.



    If you want to read documents on your Windows 10 partition, you could mount the partition in read-only mode. You won't be able to edit Word documents, but it should be enough if you want to read PDF, listen to MP3's or watch movies on your Windows partition. Another possibility would be to create a FAT32 D: partition under Windows, which you would mount with write permissions under Ubuntu.



    I could think of at least 5 short commands to destroy a Windows Partition from a Linux system, but they would all require root privileges. Be careful whenever you want to run a command starting with sudo or when a program tells you that "Authentication is required to run".



    Finally, be very careful when installing Ubuntu along Windows. The installer makes it clear which partitions are resized, created or deleted but it's still possible to delete existing partitions if you ignore the warnings long enough.



    To be safe, please follow @Emmet's excellent advice (be sure to backup your data).






    share|improve this answer















    If you have physical access to a computer, you have the power to do anything with the files on it, including reading, corrupting or deleting them.



    It's possible to make it harder to accidentally delete files, though.



    If you want to read documents on your Windows 10 partition, you could mount the partition in read-only mode. You won't be able to edit Word documents, but it should be enough if you want to read PDF, listen to MP3's or watch movies on your Windows partition. Another possibility would be to create a FAT32 D: partition under Windows, which you would mount with write permissions under Ubuntu.



    I could think of at least 5 short commands to destroy a Windows Partition from a Linux system, but they would all require root privileges. Be careful whenever you want to run a command starting with sudo or when a program tells you that "Authentication is required to run".



    Finally, be very careful when installing Ubuntu along Windows. The installer makes it clear which partitions are resized, created or deleted but it's still possible to delete existing partitions if you ignore the warnings long enough.



    To be safe, please follow @Emmet's excellent advice (be sure to backup your data).







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 20 hours ago

























    answered yesterday









    Eric DuminilEric Duminil

    32317




    32317







    • 2





      There is an equal amount of Windows commands that can damage an Ubuntu partition.

      – Brilsmurfffje
      yesterday







    • 3





      @Brilsmurfffje: Sure, it's possible to damage an Ubuntu partition from Windows. Still, Ubuntu is usually installed after Windows, it's easier to mount NTFS in Ubuntu than Ext4 in Windows and command lines are more prevalent in Ubuntu than in Windows.

      – Eric Duminil
      yesterday






    • 2





      Whenever I've dual-booted Win/Lin, I would create a FAT32 partition that appears as D: in Windows, and use it to pass anything between the OSes. I simply do not trust Windows accessing ext3/4 or Linux accessing NTFS, with write privileges.

      – Monty Harder
      yesterday






    • 1





      If you have physical access to a computer, you have the power to do anything with the files on it, including reading, corrupting or deleting them." I feel like you threw in "reading" a bit too quickly, considering encryption is a thing...

      – Mehrdad
      yesterday











    • @Mehrdad: You're right. I couldn't find a way to mention encrypted files in this sentence, because you can corrupt or delete them even if you cannot decrypt the content.

      – Eric Duminil
      13 hours ago












    • 2





      There is an equal amount of Windows commands that can damage an Ubuntu partition.

      – Brilsmurfffje
      yesterday







    • 3





      @Brilsmurfffje: Sure, it's possible to damage an Ubuntu partition from Windows. Still, Ubuntu is usually installed after Windows, it's easier to mount NTFS in Ubuntu than Ext4 in Windows and command lines are more prevalent in Ubuntu than in Windows.

      – Eric Duminil
      yesterday






    • 2





      Whenever I've dual-booted Win/Lin, I would create a FAT32 partition that appears as D: in Windows, and use it to pass anything between the OSes. I simply do not trust Windows accessing ext3/4 or Linux accessing NTFS, with write privileges.

      – Monty Harder
      yesterday






    • 1





      If you have physical access to a computer, you have the power to do anything with the files on it, including reading, corrupting or deleting them." I feel like you threw in "reading" a bit too quickly, considering encryption is a thing...

      – Mehrdad
      yesterday











    • @Mehrdad: You're right. I couldn't find a way to mention encrypted files in this sentence, because you can corrupt or delete them even if you cannot decrypt the content.

      – Eric Duminil
      13 hours ago







    2




    2





    There is an equal amount of Windows commands that can damage an Ubuntu partition.

    – Brilsmurfffje
    yesterday






    There is an equal amount of Windows commands that can damage an Ubuntu partition.

    – Brilsmurfffje
    yesterday





    3




    3





    @Brilsmurfffje: Sure, it's possible to damage an Ubuntu partition from Windows. Still, Ubuntu is usually installed after Windows, it's easier to mount NTFS in Ubuntu than Ext4 in Windows and command lines are more prevalent in Ubuntu than in Windows.

    – Eric Duminil
    yesterday





    @Brilsmurfffje: Sure, it's possible to damage an Ubuntu partition from Windows. Still, Ubuntu is usually installed after Windows, it's easier to mount NTFS in Ubuntu than Ext4 in Windows and command lines are more prevalent in Ubuntu than in Windows.

    – Eric Duminil
    yesterday




    2




    2





    Whenever I've dual-booted Win/Lin, I would create a FAT32 partition that appears as D: in Windows, and use it to pass anything between the OSes. I simply do not trust Windows accessing ext3/4 or Linux accessing NTFS, with write privileges.

    – Monty Harder
    yesterday





    Whenever I've dual-booted Win/Lin, I would create a FAT32 partition that appears as D: in Windows, and use it to pass anything between the OSes. I simply do not trust Windows accessing ext3/4 or Linux accessing NTFS, with write privileges.

    – Monty Harder
    yesterday




    1




    1





    If you have physical access to a computer, you have the power to do anything with the files on it, including reading, corrupting or deleting them." I feel like you threw in "reading" a bit too quickly, considering encryption is a thing...

    – Mehrdad
    yesterday





    If you have physical access to a computer, you have the power to do anything with the files on it, including reading, corrupting or deleting them." I feel like you threw in "reading" a bit too quickly, considering encryption is a thing...

    – Mehrdad
    yesterday













    @Mehrdad: You're right. I couldn't find a way to mention encrypted files in this sentence, because you can corrupt or delete them even if you cannot decrypt the content.

    – Eric Duminil
    13 hours ago





    @Mehrdad: You're right. I couldn't find a way to mention encrypted files in this sentence, because you can corrupt or delete them even if you cannot decrypt the content.

    – Eric Duminil
    13 hours ago













    10














    The common basic to prevent data-loss: REMEMBER TO ALWAYS TAKE BACKUP OF YOUR FILES



    It doesn't affect the windows partition, because you're running it from your Ubuntu machine.



    Picture it like this



    /dev/sda1 ntfs-bootfile
    /dev/sda2 ntfs-win
    /dev/sda5 ext4-root --> (YOUR LOCATION NOW)
    /dev/sda6 ext4-swap


    If you run rm -rf within your location, it would affect sda5 partition—in which your Ubuntu system reside. So it only affect Ubuntu.



    Supposing you have grub boot loader to load the 2 OS (Ubuntu and Windows), if you accidentally remove GRUB file aswell, Windows would not be able to boot, but the data inside will remain intact.



    However, Ubuntu tend to mount Windows partition when it available, and if you say ran rm -rf /*, Ubuntu—without hesitate will delete ALL file, this include Windows partition.



    There's also infamous dd command, hence the disk destroyer nickname. This is widely used to: formatting drive, cloning disk, creating bootable usb etc.



    dd has ability to dump entire main drive, dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda would replacing all data on main drive with zero—and goodbye to our data !



    With that being said, please be very careful when running command and always take a second look before doing execute something—it's best to prevent disaster before it happens.



    I highly recommend you to learn various Linux command, this way you could tell what does the command do before you ran it.



    Also, again please be elaborate when working with dd, it's common mistake to mistype sdb to sda, anything happens after that is horrible.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 12





      The OP asks about "codes like rm -rf." To me, this means the various destructive commands that can be done on a Linux system. Some of these will cause problems on Windows. For example cat /dev/zero > /dev/sda will write zeroes to all of /dev/sda, thus deleting all data on that drive and possibly the entire computer. Of course, such things are less likely in practice but they need to be acknowledged for a complete answer. If truly secure isolation is needed to prevent Linux from causing problems on Windows (or visa-versa), the only sufficient method is a virtual machine of some sort.

      – john01dav
      yesterday







    • 2





      Also, the windows partition could be mounted in /media or /mnt. In that case, rm -rf would surely be able to destroy windows files.

      – Eric Duminil
      yesterday






    • 4





      This answer is incorrect if the Windows partition is mounted in Ubuntu! If, say, the Windows filesystem is mounted under /mnt, and you run rm -rf /*, it's bye bye Windows files...

      – marcelm
      yesterday






    • 4





      @wizzwizz4 "No, they'll be deleted afterwards". It depends on how the "*" expands, usually in alphabetic order, so "/bin" before "/mnt". But in fact, the order does not matter, because, as you already said, "rm" already resides in memory, and this is the only thing that matters.

      – rexkogitans
      yesterday






    • 2





      @EricDuminil Assuming that the system isn't swapping, as soon as rm opens all the libraries it needs, it will not matter if those libraries are deleted from the file system. They will stay on disk, unlinked but still open by rm. What will likely cause a problem is when the OS tries to fire up a new process that needs a file or device that has already been deleted. You might panic the system at that point.

      – Doug O'Neal
      yesterday















    10














    The common basic to prevent data-loss: REMEMBER TO ALWAYS TAKE BACKUP OF YOUR FILES



    It doesn't affect the windows partition, because you're running it from your Ubuntu machine.



    Picture it like this



    /dev/sda1 ntfs-bootfile
    /dev/sda2 ntfs-win
    /dev/sda5 ext4-root --> (YOUR LOCATION NOW)
    /dev/sda6 ext4-swap


    If you run rm -rf within your location, it would affect sda5 partition—in which your Ubuntu system reside. So it only affect Ubuntu.



    Supposing you have grub boot loader to load the 2 OS (Ubuntu and Windows), if you accidentally remove GRUB file aswell, Windows would not be able to boot, but the data inside will remain intact.



    However, Ubuntu tend to mount Windows partition when it available, and if you say ran rm -rf /*, Ubuntu—without hesitate will delete ALL file, this include Windows partition.



    There's also infamous dd command, hence the disk destroyer nickname. This is widely used to: formatting drive, cloning disk, creating bootable usb etc.



    dd has ability to dump entire main drive, dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda would replacing all data on main drive with zero—and goodbye to our data !



    With that being said, please be very careful when running command and always take a second look before doing execute something—it's best to prevent disaster before it happens.



    I highly recommend you to learn various Linux command, this way you could tell what does the command do before you ran it.



    Also, again please be elaborate when working with dd, it's common mistake to mistype sdb to sda, anything happens after that is horrible.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 12





      The OP asks about "codes like rm -rf." To me, this means the various destructive commands that can be done on a Linux system. Some of these will cause problems on Windows. For example cat /dev/zero > /dev/sda will write zeroes to all of /dev/sda, thus deleting all data on that drive and possibly the entire computer. Of course, such things are less likely in practice but they need to be acknowledged for a complete answer. If truly secure isolation is needed to prevent Linux from causing problems on Windows (or visa-versa), the only sufficient method is a virtual machine of some sort.

      – john01dav
      yesterday







    • 2





      Also, the windows partition could be mounted in /media or /mnt. In that case, rm -rf would surely be able to destroy windows files.

      – Eric Duminil
      yesterday






    • 4





      This answer is incorrect if the Windows partition is mounted in Ubuntu! If, say, the Windows filesystem is mounted under /mnt, and you run rm -rf /*, it's bye bye Windows files...

      – marcelm
      yesterday






    • 4





      @wizzwizz4 "No, they'll be deleted afterwards". It depends on how the "*" expands, usually in alphabetic order, so "/bin" before "/mnt". But in fact, the order does not matter, because, as you already said, "rm" already resides in memory, and this is the only thing that matters.

      – rexkogitans
      yesterday






    • 2





      @EricDuminil Assuming that the system isn't swapping, as soon as rm opens all the libraries it needs, it will not matter if those libraries are deleted from the file system. They will stay on disk, unlinked but still open by rm. What will likely cause a problem is when the OS tries to fire up a new process that needs a file or device that has already been deleted. You might panic the system at that point.

      – Doug O'Neal
      yesterday













    10












    10








    10







    The common basic to prevent data-loss: REMEMBER TO ALWAYS TAKE BACKUP OF YOUR FILES



    It doesn't affect the windows partition, because you're running it from your Ubuntu machine.



    Picture it like this



    /dev/sda1 ntfs-bootfile
    /dev/sda2 ntfs-win
    /dev/sda5 ext4-root --> (YOUR LOCATION NOW)
    /dev/sda6 ext4-swap


    If you run rm -rf within your location, it would affect sda5 partition—in which your Ubuntu system reside. So it only affect Ubuntu.



    Supposing you have grub boot loader to load the 2 OS (Ubuntu and Windows), if you accidentally remove GRUB file aswell, Windows would not be able to boot, but the data inside will remain intact.



    However, Ubuntu tend to mount Windows partition when it available, and if you say ran rm -rf /*, Ubuntu—without hesitate will delete ALL file, this include Windows partition.



    There's also infamous dd command, hence the disk destroyer nickname. This is widely used to: formatting drive, cloning disk, creating bootable usb etc.



    dd has ability to dump entire main drive, dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda would replacing all data on main drive with zero—and goodbye to our data !



    With that being said, please be very careful when running command and always take a second look before doing execute something—it's best to prevent disaster before it happens.



    I highly recommend you to learn various Linux command, this way you could tell what does the command do before you ran it.



    Also, again please be elaborate when working with dd, it's common mistake to mistype sdb to sda, anything happens after that is horrible.






    share|improve this answer















    The common basic to prevent data-loss: REMEMBER TO ALWAYS TAKE BACKUP OF YOUR FILES



    It doesn't affect the windows partition, because you're running it from your Ubuntu machine.



    Picture it like this



    /dev/sda1 ntfs-bootfile
    /dev/sda2 ntfs-win
    /dev/sda5 ext4-root --> (YOUR LOCATION NOW)
    /dev/sda6 ext4-swap


    If you run rm -rf within your location, it would affect sda5 partition—in which your Ubuntu system reside. So it only affect Ubuntu.



    Supposing you have grub boot loader to load the 2 OS (Ubuntu and Windows), if you accidentally remove GRUB file aswell, Windows would not be able to boot, but the data inside will remain intact.



    However, Ubuntu tend to mount Windows partition when it available, and if you say ran rm -rf /*, Ubuntu—without hesitate will delete ALL file, this include Windows partition.



    There's also infamous dd command, hence the disk destroyer nickname. This is widely used to: formatting drive, cloning disk, creating bootable usb etc.



    dd has ability to dump entire main drive, dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda would replacing all data on main drive with zero—and goodbye to our data !



    With that being said, please be very careful when running command and always take a second look before doing execute something—it's best to prevent disaster before it happens.



    I highly recommend you to learn various Linux command, this way you could tell what does the command do before you ran it.



    Also, again please be elaborate when working with dd, it's common mistake to mistype sdb to sda, anything happens after that is horrible.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited yesterday

























    answered 2 days ago









    EmmetEmmet

    7,81322346




    7,81322346







    • 12





      The OP asks about "codes like rm -rf." To me, this means the various destructive commands that can be done on a Linux system. Some of these will cause problems on Windows. For example cat /dev/zero > /dev/sda will write zeroes to all of /dev/sda, thus deleting all data on that drive and possibly the entire computer. Of course, such things are less likely in practice but they need to be acknowledged for a complete answer. If truly secure isolation is needed to prevent Linux from causing problems on Windows (or visa-versa), the only sufficient method is a virtual machine of some sort.

      – john01dav
      yesterday







    • 2





      Also, the windows partition could be mounted in /media or /mnt. In that case, rm -rf would surely be able to destroy windows files.

      – Eric Duminil
      yesterday






    • 4





      This answer is incorrect if the Windows partition is mounted in Ubuntu! If, say, the Windows filesystem is mounted under /mnt, and you run rm -rf /*, it's bye bye Windows files...

      – marcelm
      yesterday






    • 4





      @wizzwizz4 "No, they'll be deleted afterwards". It depends on how the "*" expands, usually in alphabetic order, so "/bin" before "/mnt". But in fact, the order does not matter, because, as you already said, "rm" already resides in memory, and this is the only thing that matters.

      – rexkogitans
      yesterday






    • 2





      @EricDuminil Assuming that the system isn't swapping, as soon as rm opens all the libraries it needs, it will not matter if those libraries are deleted from the file system. They will stay on disk, unlinked but still open by rm. What will likely cause a problem is when the OS tries to fire up a new process that needs a file or device that has already been deleted. You might panic the system at that point.

      – Doug O'Neal
      yesterday












    • 12





      The OP asks about "codes like rm -rf." To me, this means the various destructive commands that can be done on a Linux system. Some of these will cause problems on Windows. For example cat /dev/zero > /dev/sda will write zeroes to all of /dev/sda, thus deleting all data on that drive and possibly the entire computer. Of course, such things are less likely in practice but they need to be acknowledged for a complete answer. If truly secure isolation is needed to prevent Linux from causing problems on Windows (or visa-versa), the only sufficient method is a virtual machine of some sort.

      – john01dav
      yesterday







    • 2





      Also, the windows partition could be mounted in /media or /mnt. In that case, rm -rf would surely be able to destroy windows files.

      – Eric Duminil
      yesterday






    • 4





      This answer is incorrect if the Windows partition is mounted in Ubuntu! If, say, the Windows filesystem is mounted under /mnt, and you run rm -rf /*, it's bye bye Windows files...

      – marcelm
      yesterday






    • 4





      @wizzwizz4 "No, they'll be deleted afterwards". It depends on how the "*" expands, usually in alphabetic order, so "/bin" before "/mnt". But in fact, the order does not matter, because, as you already said, "rm" already resides in memory, and this is the only thing that matters.

      – rexkogitans
      yesterday






    • 2





      @EricDuminil Assuming that the system isn't swapping, as soon as rm opens all the libraries it needs, it will not matter if those libraries are deleted from the file system. They will stay on disk, unlinked but still open by rm. What will likely cause a problem is when the OS tries to fire up a new process that needs a file or device that has already been deleted. You might panic the system at that point.

      – Doug O'Neal
      yesterday







    12




    12





    The OP asks about "codes like rm -rf." To me, this means the various destructive commands that can be done on a Linux system. Some of these will cause problems on Windows. For example cat /dev/zero > /dev/sda will write zeroes to all of /dev/sda, thus deleting all data on that drive and possibly the entire computer. Of course, such things are less likely in practice but they need to be acknowledged for a complete answer. If truly secure isolation is needed to prevent Linux from causing problems on Windows (or visa-versa), the only sufficient method is a virtual machine of some sort.

    – john01dav
    yesterday






    The OP asks about "codes like rm -rf." To me, this means the various destructive commands that can be done on a Linux system. Some of these will cause problems on Windows. For example cat /dev/zero > /dev/sda will write zeroes to all of /dev/sda, thus deleting all data on that drive and possibly the entire computer. Of course, such things are less likely in practice but they need to be acknowledged for a complete answer. If truly secure isolation is needed to prevent Linux from causing problems on Windows (or visa-versa), the only sufficient method is a virtual machine of some sort.

    – john01dav
    yesterday





    2




    2





    Also, the windows partition could be mounted in /media or /mnt. In that case, rm -rf would surely be able to destroy windows files.

    – Eric Duminil
    yesterday





    Also, the windows partition could be mounted in /media or /mnt. In that case, rm -rf would surely be able to destroy windows files.

    – Eric Duminil
    yesterday




    4




    4





    This answer is incorrect if the Windows partition is mounted in Ubuntu! If, say, the Windows filesystem is mounted under /mnt, and you run rm -rf /*, it's bye bye Windows files...

    – marcelm
    yesterday





    This answer is incorrect if the Windows partition is mounted in Ubuntu! If, say, the Windows filesystem is mounted under /mnt, and you run rm -rf /*, it's bye bye Windows files...

    – marcelm
    yesterday




    4




    4





    @wizzwizz4 "No, they'll be deleted afterwards". It depends on how the "*" expands, usually in alphabetic order, so "/bin" before "/mnt". But in fact, the order does not matter, because, as you already said, "rm" already resides in memory, and this is the only thing that matters.

    – rexkogitans
    yesterday





    @wizzwizz4 "No, they'll be deleted afterwards". It depends on how the "*" expands, usually in alphabetic order, so "/bin" before "/mnt". But in fact, the order does not matter, because, as you already said, "rm" already resides in memory, and this is the only thing that matters.

    – rexkogitans
    yesterday




    2




    2





    @EricDuminil Assuming that the system isn't swapping, as soon as rm opens all the libraries it needs, it will not matter if those libraries are deleted from the file system. They will stay on disk, unlinked but still open by rm. What will likely cause a problem is when the OS tries to fire up a new process that needs a file or device that has already been deleted. You might panic the system at that point.

    – Doug O'Neal
    yesterday





    @EricDuminil Assuming that the system isn't swapping, as soon as rm opens all the libraries it needs, it will not matter if those libraries are deleted from the file system. They will stay on disk, unlinked but still open by rm. What will likely cause a problem is when the OS tries to fire up a new process that needs a file or device that has already been deleted. You might panic the system at that point.

    – Doug O'Neal
    yesterday











    1














    If the fact that you can't keep two operating systems on one disk from harming one another makes you look for other solutions, here more options. They depend on your practical needs and your budget.



    You can run one (or both) systems as virtual machines instead of using separate partitions. The virtual machine should have limited access to the host or other virtual machine, so you cannot accidentally damage the host machine (though there will still be deliberate ways). Another advantage is that you can use both at the same time.



    If you want your two operating systems completely separate, put them on swappable hard disks or even better, separate computers (less chance to accidentally destroy your disks).



    If you need to be able to access the data but very often do the kind of stuff on your Linux which can harm the Windows system accidentally with a small lapse, put them on different machines and access Windows only through a remote access tool which respects the Windows security mechanisms. You'll get full access to your data and very high security at the price of a few hundred Euro/USD for extra hardware. Additionally, you have a backup system if one fails, so if you work on these machines, the extra cost can pay off.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Carl Dombrowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.
























      1














      If the fact that you can't keep two operating systems on one disk from harming one another makes you look for other solutions, here more options. They depend on your practical needs and your budget.



      You can run one (or both) systems as virtual machines instead of using separate partitions. The virtual machine should have limited access to the host or other virtual machine, so you cannot accidentally damage the host machine (though there will still be deliberate ways). Another advantage is that you can use both at the same time.



      If you want your two operating systems completely separate, put them on swappable hard disks or even better, separate computers (less chance to accidentally destroy your disks).



      If you need to be able to access the data but very often do the kind of stuff on your Linux which can harm the Windows system accidentally with a small lapse, put them on different machines and access Windows only through a remote access tool which respects the Windows security mechanisms. You'll get full access to your data and very high security at the price of a few hundred Euro/USD for extra hardware. Additionally, you have a backup system if one fails, so if you work on these machines, the extra cost can pay off.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Carl Dombrowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















        1












        1








        1







        If the fact that you can't keep two operating systems on one disk from harming one another makes you look for other solutions, here more options. They depend on your practical needs and your budget.



        You can run one (or both) systems as virtual machines instead of using separate partitions. The virtual machine should have limited access to the host or other virtual machine, so you cannot accidentally damage the host machine (though there will still be deliberate ways). Another advantage is that you can use both at the same time.



        If you want your two operating systems completely separate, put them on swappable hard disks or even better, separate computers (less chance to accidentally destroy your disks).



        If you need to be able to access the data but very often do the kind of stuff on your Linux which can harm the Windows system accidentally with a small lapse, put them on different machines and access Windows only through a remote access tool which respects the Windows security mechanisms. You'll get full access to your data and very high security at the price of a few hundred Euro/USD for extra hardware. Additionally, you have a backup system if one fails, so if you work on these machines, the extra cost can pay off.






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Carl Dombrowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.










        If the fact that you can't keep two operating systems on one disk from harming one another makes you look for other solutions, here more options. They depend on your practical needs and your budget.



        You can run one (or both) systems as virtual machines instead of using separate partitions. The virtual machine should have limited access to the host or other virtual machine, so you cannot accidentally damage the host machine (though there will still be deliberate ways). Another advantage is that you can use both at the same time.



        If you want your two operating systems completely separate, put them on swappable hard disks or even better, separate computers (less chance to accidentally destroy your disks).



        If you need to be able to access the data but very often do the kind of stuff on your Linux which can harm the Windows system accidentally with a small lapse, put them on different machines and access Windows only through a remote access tool which respects the Windows security mechanisms. You'll get full access to your data and very high security at the price of a few hundred Euro/USD for extra hardware. Additionally, you have a backup system if one fails, so if you work on these machines, the extra cost can pay off.







        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Carl Dombrowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer






        New contributor




        Carl Dombrowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered yesterday









        Carl DombrowskiCarl Dombrowski

        111




        111




        New contributor




        Carl Dombrowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        Carl Dombrowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        Carl Dombrowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





















            0














            Risks like this can be easily mitigated by enabling BitLocker drive encryption on the Windows10 operating system. Encrypting the partition makes it for Ubuntu unable to mount and thus perform actions like rm -r



            It also means that you are unable to share files with the ubuntu system via the windows partition.



            If you would like to share data between the two operating systems I would advise you to create a separate data partition which you mount on both operating systems.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 5





              Being unable to mount a file system does not make Ubuntu unable to damage it. dd could still overwrite relevant sectors of the disk used by windows, making the encrypted file system permanently unrecoverable.

              – Patrick Trentin
              yesterday







            • 2





              @PatrickTrentin: Indeed. You may not be able to read any meaningful content from Windows partition, but cat, dd, fdisk, parted, or mkfs.ntfs will all happily destroy any data on the partition, encrypted or not.

              – Eric Duminil
              yesterday
















            0














            Risks like this can be easily mitigated by enabling BitLocker drive encryption on the Windows10 operating system. Encrypting the partition makes it for Ubuntu unable to mount and thus perform actions like rm -r



            It also means that you are unable to share files with the ubuntu system via the windows partition.



            If you would like to share data between the two operating systems I would advise you to create a separate data partition which you mount on both operating systems.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 5





              Being unable to mount a file system does not make Ubuntu unable to damage it. dd could still overwrite relevant sectors of the disk used by windows, making the encrypted file system permanently unrecoverable.

              – Patrick Trentin
              yesterday







            • 2





              @PatrickTrentin: Indeed. You may not be able to read any meaningful content from Windows partition, but cat, dd, fdisk, parted, or mkfs.ntfs will all happily destroy any data on the partition, encrypted or not.

              – Eric Duminil
              yesterday














            0












            0








            0







            Risks like this can be easily mitigated by enabling BitLocker drive encryption on the Windows10 operating system. Encrypting the partition makes it for Ubuntu unable to mount and thus perform actions like rm -r



            It also means that you are unable to share files with the ubuntu system via the windows partition.



            If you would like to share data between the two operating systems I would advise you to create a separate data partition which you mount on both operating systems.






            share|improve this answer













            Risks like this can be easily mitigated by enabling BitLocker drive encryption on the Windows10 operating system. Encrypting the partition makes it for Ubuntu unable to mount and thus perform actions like rm -r



            It also means that you are unable to share files with the ubuntu system via the windows partition.



            If you would like to share data between the two operating systems I would advise you to create a separate data partition which you mount on both operating systems.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered yesterday









            BrilsmurfffjeBrilsmurfffje

            1033




            1033







            • 5





              Being unable to mount a file system does not make Ubuntu unable to damage it. dd could still overwrite relevant sectors of the disk used by windows, making the encrypted file system permanently unrecoverable.

              – Patrick Trentin
              yesterday







            • 2





              @PatrickTrentin: Indeed. You may not be able to read any meaningful content from Windows partition, but cat, dd, fdisk, parted, or mkfs.ntfs will all happily destroy any data on the partition, encrypted or not.

              – Eric Duminil
              yesterday













            • 5





              Being unable to mount a file system does not make Ubuntu unable to damage it. dd could still overwrite relevant sectors of the disk used by windows, making the encrypted file system permanently unrecoverable.

              – Patrick Trentin
              yesterday







            • 2





              @PatrickTrentin: Indeed. You may not be able to read any meaningful content from Windows partition, but cat, dd, fdisk, parted, or mkfs.ntfs will all happily destroy any data on the partition, encrypted or not.

              – Eric Duminil
              yesterday








            5




            5





            Being unable to mount a file system does not make Ubuntu unable to damage it. dd could still overwrite relevant sectors of the disk used by windows, making the encrypted file system permanently unrecoverable.

            – Patrick Trentin
            yesterday






            Being unable to mount a file system does not make Ubuntu unable to damage it. dd could still overwrite relevant sectors of the disk used by windows, making the encrypted file system permanently unrecoverable.

            – Patrick Trentin
            yesterday





            2




            2





            @PatrickTrentin: Indeed. You may not be able to read any meaningful content from Windows partition, but cat, dd, fdisk, parted, or mkfs.ntfs will all happily destroy any data on the partition, encrypted or not.

            – Eric Duminil
            yesterday






            @PatrickTrentin: Indeed. You may not be able to read any meaningful content from Windows partition, but cat, dd, fdisk, parted, or mkfs.ntfs will all happily destroy any data on the partition, encrypted or not.

            – Eric Duminil
            yesterday











            K. Paul is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            K. Paul is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            K. Paul is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            K. Paul is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1132599%2fprotecting-dualbooting-windows-from-dangerous-code-like-rm-rf%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -18.04, dual-boot, partitioning, windows-10

            Popular posts from this blog

            Mobil Contents History Mobil brands Former Mobil brands Lukoil transaction Mobil UK Mobil Australia Mobil New Zealand Mobil Greece Mobil in Japan Mobil in Canada Mobil Egypt See also References External links Navigation menuwww.mobil.com"Mobil Corporation"the original"Our Houston campus""Business & Finance: Socony-Vacuum Corp.""Popular Mechanics""Lubrite Technologies""Exxon Mobil campus 'clearly happening'""Toledo Blade - Google News Archive Search""The Lion and the Moose - How 2 Executives Pulled off the Biggest Merger Ever""ExxonMobil Press Release""Lubricants""Archived copy"the original"Mobil 1™ and Mobil Super™ motor oil and synthetic motor oil - Mobil™ Motor Oils""Mobil Delvac""Mobil Industrial website""The State of Competition in Gasoline Marketing: The Effects of Refiner Operations at Retail""Mobil Travel Guide to become Forbes Travel Guide""Hotel Rankings: Forbes Merges with Mobil"the original"Jamieson oil industry history""Mobil news""Caltex pumps for control""Watchdog blocks Caltex bid""Exxon Mobil sells service station network""Mobil Oil New Zealand Limited is New Zealand's oldest oil company, with predecessor companies having first established a presence in the country in 1896""ExxonMobil subsidiaries have a business history in New Zealand stretching back more than 120 years. We are involved in petroleum refining and distribution and the marketing of fuels, lubricants and chemical products""Archived copy"the original"Exxon Mobil to Sell Its Japanese Arm for $3.9 Billion""Gas station merger will end Esso and Mobil's long run in Japan""Esso moves to affiliate itself with PC Optimum, no longer Aeroplan, in loyalty point switch""Mobil brand of gas stations to launch in Canada after deal for 213 Loblaws-owned locations""Mobil Nears Completion of Rebranding 200 Loblaw Gas Stations""Learn about ExxonMobil's operations in Egypt""Petrol and Diesel Service Stations in Egypt - Mobil"Official websiteExxon Mobil corporate websiteMobil Industrial official websiteeeeeeeeDA04275022275790-40000 0001 0860 5061n82045453134887257134887257

            Frič See also Navigation menuinternal link

            Identify plant with long narrow paired leaves and reddish stems Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?What is this plant with long sharp leaves? Is it a weed?What is this 3ft high, stalky plant, with mid sized narrow leaves?What is this young shrub with opposite ovate, crenate leaves and reddish stems?What is this plant with large broad serrated leaves?Identify this upright branching weed with long leaves and reddish stemsPlease help me identify this bulbous plant with long, broad leaves and white flowersWhat is this small annual with narrow gray/green leaves and rust colored daisy-type flowers?What is this chilli plant?Does anyone know what type of chilli plant this is?Help identify this plant