Source of /etc/protocols and /etc/services?/etc/rc*: Why does this command stop NFS services from starting at boot?What is the meaning of /etc (as acronym)How to use Public IP in case of Two ISP which difers from each other PfsenseWhat's the difference of `/etc/modules-load.d` and `/etc/modules`?iptables - how to drop protocolsAccidentally deleted /etc/network/interfaces on UbuntuConfused about “/etc/init.d” and services in “/lib/systemd/system”/etc/machine-info is missingStandards and protocols that were first implemented on Linux/Open sourceDual Boot System File Issues with /Etc/ Hosts and Profile

Is expanding the research of a group into machine learning as a PhD student risky?

How to run a prison with the smallest amount of guards?

Type int? vs type int

How to check is there any negative term in a large list?

Nautlius: add mouse right-click action to compute MD5 sum

How did Arya survive the stabbing?

Detecting if an element is found inside a container

Opposite of a diet

How do I find the solutions of the following equation?

Hostile work environment after whistle-blowing on coworker and our boss. What do I do?

Avoiding estate tax by giving multiple gifts

Is exact Kanji stroke length important?

Is a stroke of luck acceptable after a series of unfavorable events?

Do sorcerers' subtle spells require a skill check to be unseen?

when is out of tune ok?

CREATE opcode: what does it really do?

What is the intuitive meaning of having a linear relationship between the logs of two variables?

How easy is it to start Magic from scratch?

Unreliable Magic - Is it worth it?

Escape a backup date in a file name

How to Reset Passwords on Multiple Websites Easily?

Trouble understanding the speech of overseas colleagues

Does "every" first-order theory have a finitely axiomatizable conservative extension?

Why, precisely, is argon used in neutrino experiments?



Source of /etc/protocols and /etc/services?


/etc/rc*: Why does this command stop NFS services from starting at boot?What is the meaning of /etc (as acronym)How to use Public IP in case of Two ISP which difers from each other PfsenseWhat's the difference of `/etc/modules-load.d` and `/etc/modules`?iptables - how to drop protocolsAccidentally deleted /etc/network/interfaces on UbuntuConfused about “/etc/init.d” and services in “/lib/systemd/system”/etc/machine-info is missingStandards and protocols that were first implemented on Linux/Open sourceDual Boot System File Issues with /Etc/ Hosts and Profile













1















Those files are databases which contain IP protocol number, alias and service mappings. As a user I don't usually interact with those in any direct way, but the need to create special Linux/GNU distribution arose and I have noted that perl test-suite fails due to inability to fetch required numbers from the /etc/protocols database because it doesn't exists in my custom system.



For example from my desktop distro of choice(SMP Debian 4.17.17-1 (2018-08-18) x86_64 GNU/Linux):



/etc/protocols claims to be created from IANA list.



# Internet (IP) protocols
#
# Updated from http://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers and other
# sources.
# New protocols will be added on request if they have been officially
# assigned by IANA and are not historical.
# If you need a huge list of used numbers please install the nmap package.


The same goes for /etc/services.



# Network services, Internet style
#
# Note that it is presently the policy of IANA to assign a single well-known
# port number for both TCP and UDP; hence, officially ports have two entries
# even if the protocol doesn't support UDP operations.
#
# Updated from http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers and other
# sources like http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/etc/services .
# New ports will be added on request if they have been officially assigned
# by IANA and used in the real-world or are needed by a debian package.
# If you need a huge list of used numbers please install the nmap package.


Indeed, the data they provide looks to be from indicated sources(but not at full extent, those databases seem to be partial). That specificity made me completely confused.



There are posix function calls to access them - getprotoent(3) which are described by IEEE Std 1003.1-2008 as follows:




endprotoent, getprotobyname, getprotobynumber, getprotoent, setprotoent - network protocol database functions



These functions shall retrieve information about protocols. This information is considered to be stored in a database that can be accessed sequentially or randomly. The implementation of this database is unspecified.




Format is relatively simple, and it would be nice to provide those files, but I don't want to fill databases manually or copy others work without proper understanding: is there any sort of central source for those? Who is responsible for filling the database?



  • Library which exposes getprotoent(3) calls and therefore defines format(like, glibc)?

  • Is there a standard content image of those specified in current POSIX spec?

  • Distro maintainers to which it belongs?

  • Or someone/something else entirely?









share|improve this question







New contributor




Semion Nadezhdin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    1















    Those files are databases which contain IP protocol number, alias and service mappings. As a user I don't usually interact with those in any direct way, but the need to create special Linux/GNU distribution arose and I have noted that perl test-suite fails due to inability to fetch required numbers from the /etc/protocols database because it doesn't exists in my custom system.



    For example from my desktop distro of choice(SMP Debian 4.17.17-1 (2018-08-18) x86_64 GNU/Linux):



    /etc/protocols claims to be created from IANA list.



    # Internet (IP) protocols
    #
    # Updated from http://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers and other
    # sources.
    # New protocols will be added on request if they have been officially
    # assigned by IANA and are not historical.
    # If you need a huge list of used numbers please install the nmap package.


    The same goes for /etc/services.



    # Network services, Internet style
    #
    # Note that it is presently the policy of IANA to assign a single well-known
    # port number for both TCP and UDP; hence, officially ports have two entries
    # even if the protocol doesn't support UDP operations.
    #
    # Updated from http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers and other
    # sources like http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/etc/services .
    # New ports will be added on request if they have been officially assigned
    # by IANA and used in the real-world or are needed by a debian package.
    # If you need a huge list of used numbers please install the nmap package.


    Indeed, the data they provide looks to be from indicated sources(but not at full extent, those databases seem to be partial). That specificity made me completely confused.



    There are posix function calls to access them - getprotoent(3) which are described by IEEE Std 1003.1-2008 as follows:




    endprotoent, getprotobyname, getprotobynumber, getprotoent, setprotoent - network protocol database functions



    These functions shall retrieve information about protocols. This information is considered to be stored in a database that can be accessed sequentially or randomly. The implementation of this database is unspecified.




    Format is relatively simple, and it would be nice to provide those files, but I don't want to fill databases manually or copy others work without proper understanding: is there any sort of central source for those? Who is responsible for filling the database?



    • Library which exposes getprotoent(3) calls and therefore defines format(like, glibc)?

    • Is there a standard content image of those specified in current POSIX spec?

    • Distro maintainers to which it belongs?

    • Or someone/something else entirely?









    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    Semion Nadezhdin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      1












      1








      1








      Those files are databases which contain IP protocol number, alias and service mappings. As a user I don't usually interact with those in any direct way, but the need to create special Linux/GNU distribution arose and I have noted that perl test-suite fails due to inability to fetch required numbers from the /etc/protocols database because it doesn't exists in my custom system.



      For example from my desktop distro of choice(SMP Debian 4.17.17-1 (2018-08-18) x86_64 GNU/Linux):



      /etc/protocols claims to be created from IANA list.



      # Internet (IP) protocols
      #
      # Updated from http://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers and other
      # sources.
      # New protocols will be added on request if they have been officially
      # assigned by IANA and are not historical.
      # If you need a huge list of used numbers please install the nmap package.


      The same goes for /etc/services.



      # Network services, Internet style
      #
      # Note that it is presently the policy of IANA to assign a single well-known
      # port number for both TCP and UDP; hence, officially ports have two entries
      # even if the protocol doesn't support UDP operations.
      #
      # Updated from http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers and other
      # sources like http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/etc/services .
      # New ports will be added on request if they have been officially assigned
      # by IANA and used in the real-world or are needed by a debian package.
      # If you need a huge list of used numbers please install the nmap package.


      Indeed, the data they provide looks to be from indicated sources(but not at full extent, those databases seem to be partial). That specificity made me completely confused.



      There are posix function calls to access them - getprotoent(3) which are described by IEEE Std 1003.1-2008 as follows:




      endprotoent, getprotobyname, getprotobynumber, getprotoent, setprotoent - network protocol database functions



      These functions shall retrieve information about protocols. This information is considered to be stored in a database that can be accessed sequentially or randomly. The implementation of this database is unspecified.




      Format is relatively simple, and it would be nice to provide those files, but I don't want to fill databases manually or copy others work without proper understanding: is there any sort of central source for those? Who is responsible for filling the database?



      • Library which exposes getprotoent(3) calls and therefore defines format(like, glibc)?

      • Is there a standard content image of those specified in current POSIX spec?

      • Distro maintainers to which it belongs?

      • Or someone/something else entirely?









      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Semion Nadezhdin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      Those files are databases which contain IP protocol number, alias and service mappings. As a user I don't usually interact with those in any direct way, but the need to create special Linux/GNU distribution arose and I have noted that perl test-suite fails due to inability to fetch required numbers from the /etc/protocols database because it doesn't exists in my custom system.



      For example from my desktop distro of choice(SMP Debian 4.17.17-1 (2018-08-18) x86_64 GNU/Linux):



      /etc/protocols claims to be created from IANA list.



      # Internet (IP) protocols
      #
      # Updated from http://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers and other
      # sources.
      # New protocols will be added on request if they have been officially
      # assigned by IANA and are not historical.
      # If you need a huge list of used numbers please install the nmap package.


      The same goes for /etc/services.



      # Network services, Internet style
      #
      # Note that it is presently the policy of IANA to assign a single well-known
      # port number for both TCP and UDP; hence, officially ports have two entries
      # even if the protocol doesn't support UDP operations.
      #
      # Updated from http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers and other
      # sources like http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/etc/services .
      # New ports will be added on request if they have been officially assigned
      # by IANA and used in the real-world or are needed by a debian package.
      # If you need a huge list of used numbers please install the nmap package.


      Indeed, the data they provide looks to be from indicated sources(but not at full extent, those databases seem to be partial). That specificity made me completely confused.



      There are posix function calls to access them - getprotoent(3) which are described by IEEE Std 1003.1-2008 as follows:




      endprotoent, getprotobyname, getprotobynumber, getprotoent, setprotoent - network protocol database functions



      These functions shall retrieve information about protocols. This information is considered to be stored in a database that can be accessed sequentially or randomly. The implementation of this database is unspecified.




      Format is relatively simple, and it would be nice to provide those files, but I don't want to fill databases manually or copy others work without proper understanding: is there any sort of central source for those? Who is responsible for filling the database?



      • Library which exposes getprotoent(3) calls and therefore defines format(like, glibc)?

      • Is there a standard content image of those specified in current POSIX spec?

      • Distro maintainers to which it belongs?

      • Or someone/something else entirely?






      linux networking posix etc






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Semion Nadezhdin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Semion Nadezhdin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      Semion Nadezhdin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked yesterday









      Semion NadezhdinSemion Nadezhdin

      82




      82




      New contributor




      Semion Nadezhdin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Semion Nadezhdin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Semion Nadezhdin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Since you’re creating your own distribution, the responsibility for the contents of the /etc/protocols and /etc/services files you install rests with you.



          The authority controlling the assignments of protocol and service numbers is the IANA, as documented in the file headers you quote; the corresponding lists are available on their web site, for protocol numbers and service names and port numbers. However, distribution maintainers commonly add entries which are used but haven’t been submitted to the IANA, or haven’t been approved, and remove entries which they consider to be obsolete. For Debian, the source of both files is in the netbase repository.



          POSIX defines functions which can be used to retrieve protocol and service information, but it doesn’t specify how that data is stored or retrieved, as indicated in your quote:




          The implementation of this database is unspecified.




          The information contained in the database is also unspecified; POSIX only imposes requirements on the schema, effectively.






          share|improve this answer






















            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "106"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );






            Semion Nadezhdin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f508732%2fsource-of-etc-protocols-and-etc-services%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            Since you’re creating your own distribution, the responsibility for the contents of the /etc/protocols and /etc/services files you install rests with you.



            The authority controlling the assignments of protocol and service numbers is the IANA, as documented in the file headers you quote; the corresponding lists are available on their web site, for protocol numbers and service names and port numbers. However, distribution maintainers commonly add entries which are used but haven’t been submitted to the IANA, or haven’t been approved, and remove entries which they consider to be obsolete. For Debian, the source of both files is in the netbase repository.



            POSIX defines functions which can be used to retrieve protocol and service information, but it doesn’t specify how that data is stored or retrieved, as indicated in your quote:




            The implementation of this database is unspecified.




            The information contained in the database is also unspecified; POSIX only imposes requirements on the schema, effectively.






            share|improve this answer



























              1














              Since you’re creating your own distribution, the responsibility for the contents of the /etc/protocols and /etc/services files you install rests with you.



              The authority controlling the assignments of protocol and service numbers is the IANA, as documented in the file headers you quote; the corresponding lists are available on their web site, for protocol numbers and service names and port numbers. However, distribution maintainers commonly add entries which are used but haven’t been submitted to the IANA, or haven’t been approved, and remove entries which they consider to be obsolete. For Debian, the source of both files is in the netbase repository.



              POSIX defines functions which can be used to retrieve protocol and service information, but it doesn’t specify how that data is stored or retrieved, as indicated in your quote:




              The implementation of this database is unspecified.




              The information contained in the database is also unspecified; POSIX only imposes requirements on the schema, effectively.






              share|improve this answer

























                1












                1








                1







                Since you’re creating your own distribution, the responsibility for the contents of the /etc/protocols and /etc/services files you install rests with you.



                The authority controlling the assignments of protocol and service numbers is the IANA, as documented in the file headers you quote; the corresponding lists are available on their web site, for protocol numbers and service names and port numbers. However, distribution maintainers commonly add entries which are used but haven’t been submitted to the IANA, or haven’t been approved, and remove entries which they consider to be obsolete. For Debian, the source of both files is in the netbase repository.



                POSIX defines functions which can be used to retrieve protocol and service information, but it doesn’t specify how that data is stored or retrieved, as indicated in your quote:




                The implementation of this database is unspecified.




                The information contained in the database is also unspecified; POSIX only imposes requirements on the schema, effectively.






                share|improve this answer













                Since you’re creating your own distribution, the responsibility for the contents of the /etc/protocols and /etc/services files you install rests with you.



                The authority controlling the assignments of protocol and service numbers is the IANA, as documented in the file headers you quote; the corresponding lists are available on their web site, for protocol numbers and service names and port numbers. However, distribution maintainers commonly add entries which are used but haven’t been submitted to the IANA, or haven’t been approved, and remove entries which they consider to be obsolete. For Debian, the source of both files is in the netbase repository.



                POSIX defines functions which can be used to retrieve protocol and service information, but it doesn’t specify how that data is stored or retrieved, as indicated in your quote:




                The implementation of this database is unspecified.




                The information contained in the database is also unspecified; POSIX only imposes requirements on the schema, effectively.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered yesterday









                Stephen KittStephen Kitt

                178k24405481




                178k24405481




















                    Semion Nadezhdin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    Semion Nadezhdin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    Semion Nadezhdin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                    Semion Nadezhdin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f508732%2fsource-of-etc-protocols-and-etc-services%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -etc, linux, networking, posix

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god existsWord for having a definite opinion while simultaneously withholding judgment?What's the opposite of “newcomer? Is ”veteran" OK?What do you call an “atheist” who might believe in an afterlife?What's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Word for someone who dismisses contrary opinions as irrational?Somone who thinks they are overly special/out of the ordinaryIs there a word, phrase or idiom for “a person who is incapable of thinking about the future”?The belief that a god is human-likeA word for a non-famous person/thing you have heard a lot aboutAdjective for a person who enjoys taking care of their appearance

                    2017 IndyCar Series Contents Series news Teams and drivers Schedule Season summary Footnotes References External links Navigation menu"INDYCAR: Initial 2018 bodywork concepts unveiled"the original"IndyCar confirms switch to Performance Friction brakes in 2017""AJ Foyt Racing will switch to Chevy"the original"Carlos Munoz, Conor Daly will drive for AJ Foyt Racing""Zach Veach's Indy 500 Debut Confirmed with Foyt""No mass exodus from Honda after Ganassi switch""Ex-F1 driver Sato joins Andretti Autosport for 2017 IndyCar season""IndyCar's Ryan Hunter-Reay, sponsor DHL paired through 2020""hhgregg and Andretti Autosport announce partnership for key races in 2016""INDYCAR: Rossi re-signs with Andretti"the original"McLaren Formula 1 - Fernando Alonso to race at Indy 500 with McLaren, Honda and Andretti Autosport""Shank will finally take part in Indy 500 with Harvey, Andretti | MotorSportsTalk""Andretti adds Jack Harvey to Indy 500 field""Ganassi switches to Honda power for 2017""INDYCAR: Chilton returns to Ganassi"the original"IndyCar silly season: Who's going where in 2017?""INDYCAR: Kanaan, NTT Data return to Ganassi"the original"Kimball to remain at Ganassi for 2017""Coyne confirms Bourdais for 2017 IndyCar season""Davison to sub for Bourdais in Indy 500"the original"Gutierrez confirmed for Detroit IndyCar debut""Gutierrez returns with Coyne for rest of 2017 season""Vautier to drive for Coyne at Texas"the original"INDYCAR: Coyne confirms Jones for 2017"the original"Pippa Mann returns to Coyne for Indy 500""Karam, Dreyer & Reinbold teaming up again for Indianapolis 500""Pigot to return to Ed Carpenter Racing""Hildebrand confirmed as full-time Ed Carpenter driver""Veach to replace injured Hildebrand at Barber"the originalNew Team Harding Racing Enters Chaves for 101st Indianapolis 500"Juncos Racing Announces Entry in 101st Running of the Indianapolis 500 :: Juncos Racing""Juncos confirms Pigot for Indy 500""Saavedra confirmed in Juncos' second 500 entry"the original"Lazier confirms Indy 500 run after son's USF2000 debut"the original"Claman DeMelo to race for RLLR at Sonoma"the original"Rahal signs Servia and ace engineer for 2017""IndyCar: Aleshin returns with Schmidt"the original"Aleshin replaced by Saavedra for Toronto""Jack Harvey will pilot SPM No. 7 car at Watkins Glen, Sonoma""Jay Howard confirmed in Tony Stewart's supported SPM Indy entry""INDYCAR: Newgarden to wave the flag at Penske"the original"Pagenaud opts for No. 1 in 2017"the original"Penske confirms Newgarden for 2017""Montoya to stay with Team Penske in 2017""Target leaving IndyCar after 27 seasons with Chip Ganassi""Cavin: IndyCar could see complete driver/team shakeup in 2017""End of the road for KV Racing?""KV Racing confirms closure, equipment sold to Juncos""Juncos confirms IndyCar Series entry"the original"Juncos readies IndyCar program, aims for '17 500"the original"Harding Racing to add Texas, Pocono to schedule"the original"Sato signs with Andretti Autosport for 2017""INDYCAR: Aleshin in Doubt at SPM"the original"Long Beach notebook: JR Hildebrand breaks hand""Hildebrand cleared to return at Phoenix"the original"Bourdais to undergo surgery on multiple fractures""Aleshin loses Schmidt Peterson IndyCar ride""Saavedra in at SPM for Pocono, Gateway"the original"Bourdais to make return at Gateway"the original"The IndyCar Grand Prix no longer is sponsored by Angie's List""2017 IndyCar Series rulebook""2017 Verizon IndyCar Series Official Rulebook"Official websiteeeeee

                    Can I sign legal documents with a smiley face?Do Legal Documents Require Signing In Standard Pen Colors?Is it possible to legally prohibit someone from linking to specific pages on your website?Do scans of signed documents have the same legal power as the original document?What can I do if I signed an excessively restrictive contract?Can other party sneak in new contract terms via termination notice?How to prove that someone forged my signature on a contract that I was not aware of?In Australia, Is it legal to sign a document as somebody else?making a contract that includes video licenceLease dispute, over email and text messageIf you must include all of the natural language prose in a legal document, or if it can be abstracted outE-signing: legal ramifications of “identifying” a person