The repository jessie-backports Release does no longer have a Release file [duplicate]Failed to fetch jessie backports repositoryI can't use or find the google debian unstable/sid repositoryuninitialized constant XML::SaxParser / Error retrieving bug reports from the serverDebian security updatesapt pinning priority restricted`apt update` failed on Debian LinuxUnable to find expected entry 'main/binary-mipsel/Packages' in Release filehow to update cURL openssl version for paypal IPNapt update isn't working on Debian 9How to get rid of a PPA?can't install ecodmsserver on crunchbang++ / Debian 9 stretch distro

What Brexit proposals are on the table in the indicative votes on the 27th of March 2019?

How can I get through very long and very dry, but also very useful technical documents when learning a new tool?

Why escape if the_content isnt?

How can a function with a hole (removable discontinuity) equal a function with no hole?

Term for the "extreme-extension" version of a straw man fallacy?

Is HostGator storing my password in plaintext?

Purchasing a ticket for someone else in another country?

Is a stroke of luck acceptable after a series of unfavorable events?

You cannot touch me, but I can touch you, who am I?

Risk of infection at the gym?

Proof of work - lottery approach

Short story about space worker geeks who zone out by 'listening' to radiation from stars

Is this apparent Class Action settlement a spam message?

A particular customize with green line and letters for subfloat

How to write papers efficiently when English isn't my first language?

What is the difference between "behavior" and "behaviour"?

Did Dumbledore lie to Harry about how long he had James Potter's invisibility cloak when he was examining it? If so, why?

Sort a list by elements of another list

How did Doctor Strange see the winning outcome in Avengers: Infinity War?

Detecting if an element is found inside a container

What is paid subscription needed for in Mortal Kombat 11?

Applicability of Single Responsibility Principle

Do the temporary hit points from the Battlerager barbarian's Reckless Abandon stack if I make multiple attacks on my turn?

Two monoidal structures and copowering



The repository jessie-backports Release does no longer have a Release file [duplicate]


Failed to fetch jessie backports repositoryI can't use or find the google debian unstable/sid repositoryuninitialized constant XML::SaxParser / Error retrieving bug reports from the serverDebian security updatesapt pinning priority restricted`apt update` failed on Debian LinuxUnable to find expected entry 'main/binary-mipsel/Packages' in Release filehow to update cURL openssl version for paypal IPNapt update isn't working on Debian 9How to get rid of a PPA?can't install ecodmsserver on crunchbang++ / Debian 9 stretch distro













-2
















This question already has an answer here:



  • Failed to fetch jessie backports repository

    4 answers



I get the following output (and error at the end) when I run apt update on my system:



$ sudo apt update
Ign:1 http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch InRelease
Hit:2 http://packages.microsoft.com/repos/vscode stable InRelease
Ign:3 http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb stable InRelease
Hit:4 http://security.debian.org/debian-security stable/updates InRelease
Hit:6 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stable-updates InRelease
Hit:7 http://fai-project.org/download stretch InRelease
Hit:8 http://repository.spotify.com stable InRelease
Hit:9 http://deb.debian.org/debian-security stretch/updates InRelease
Hit:10 http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb stable Release
Hit:12 http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch-backports InRelease
Hit:13 https://download.docker.com/linux/debian stretch InRelease
Hit:14 https://deb.nodesource.com/node_10.x stretch InRelease
Ign:15 http://deb.debian.org/debian stable InRelease
Ign:17 http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-backports InRelease
Ign:18 http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie InRelease
Hit:19 http://deb.debian.org/debian testing InRelease
Hit:5 https://release.memsql.com/production/debian memsql InRelease
Hit:20 http://deb.debian.org/debian unstable InRelease
Hit:21 http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch Release
Hit:11 https://packagecloud.io/slacktechnologies/slack/debian jessie InRelease
Hit:23 http://deb.debian.org/debian stable Release
Err:25 http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-backports Release
404 Not Found [IP: 151.101.248.204 80]
Hit:26 http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie Release
Reading package lists... Done
E: The repository 'http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-backports Release' does no longer have a Release file.
N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default.
N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details.


I don't understand why I'm getting this error.



$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list
# These lines should work for many sites

deb http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch main contrib non-free
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian-security stretch/updates main contrib non-free
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch-backports main contrib non-free

# repository that may contain newer fai packages for stretch
deb [trusted=yes] http://fai-project.org/download stretch koeln

$ grep jessie-backports /etc/apt/sources.list.d/*
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list:deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie-backports main contrib non-free
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list:# deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie-backports main contrib non-free
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list.save:deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie-backports main contrib non-free
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list.save:# deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie-backports main contrib non-free


Some system information:



$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Debian
Description: Debian GNU/Linux 9.8 (stretch)
Release: 9.8
Codename: stretch









share|improve this question









New contributor




David Gomes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











marked as duplicate by A.B, GAD3R, jimmij, nwildner, Kusalananda♦ 9 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • 6





    Look at /etc/apt/sources.list.d/.

    – Ipor Sircer
    yesterday












  • @IporSircer I updated the question to include some information from that directory as well.

    – David Gomes
    yesterday











  • I notice the use of [trusted=yes] on a non-https URL, rather than following the documentation on how to retrieve the correct signature key. This probably exposes you to a man-in-the-middle malware package injection anywhere in the path (so for example especially bad if it's a laptop on the move).

    – A.B
    yesterday
















-2
















This question already has an answer here:



  • Failed to fetch jessie backports repository

    4 answers



I get the following output (and error at the end) when I run apt update on my system:



$ sudo apt update
Ign:1 http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch InRelease
Hit:2 http://packages.microsoft.com/repos/vscode stable InRelease
Ign:3 http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb stable InRelease
Hit:4 http://security.debian.org/debian-security stable/updates InRelease
Hit:6 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stable-updates InRelease
Hit:7 http://fai-project.org/download stretch InRelease
Hit:8 http://repository.spotify.com stable InRelease
Hit:9 http://deb.debian.org/debian-security stretch/updates InRelease
Hit:10 http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb stable Release
Hit:12 http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch-backports InRelease
Hit:13 https://download.docker.com/linux/debian stretch InRelease
Hit:14 https://deb.nodesource.com/node_10.x stretch InRelease
Ign:15 http://deb.debian.org/debian stable InRelease
Ign:17 http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-backports InRelease
Ign:18 http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie InRelease
Hit:19 http://deb.debian.org/debian testing InRelease
Hit:5 https://release.memsql.com/production/debian memsql InRelease
Hit:20 http://deb.debian.org/debian unstable InRelease
Hit:21 http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch Release
Hit:11 https://packagecloud.io/slacktechnologies/slack/debian jessie InRelease
Hit:23 http://deb.debian.org/debian stable Release
Err:25 http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-backports Release
404 Not Found [IP: 151.101.248.204 80]
Hit:26 http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie Release
Reading package lists... Done
E: The repository 'http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-backports Release' does no longer have a Release file.
N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default.
N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details.


I don't understand why I'm getting this error.



$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list
# These lines should work for many sites

deb http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch main contrib non-free
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian-security stretch/updates main contrib non-free
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch-backports main contrib non-free

# repository that may contain newer fai packages for stretch
deb [trusted=yes] http://fai-project.org/download stretch koeln

$ grep jessie-backports /etc/apt/sources.list.d/*
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list:deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie-backports main contrib non-free
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list:# deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie-backports main contrib non-free
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list.save:deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie-backports main contrib non-free
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list.save:# deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie-backports main contrib non-free


Some system information:



$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Debian
Description: Debian GNU/Linux 9.8 (stretch)
Release: 9.8
Codename: stretch









share|improve this question









New contributor




David Gomes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











marked as duplicate by A.B, GAD3R, jimmij, nwildner, Kusalananda♦ 9 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • 6





    Look at /etc/apt/sources.list.d/.

    – Ipor Sircer
    yesterday












  • @IporSircer I updated the question to include some information from that directory as well.

    – David Gomes
    yesterday











  • I notice the use of [trusted=yes] on a non-https URL, rather than following the documentation on how to retrieve the correct signature key. This probably exposes you to a man-in-the-middle malware package injection anywhere in the path (so for example especially bad if it's a laptop on the move).

    – A.B
    yesterday














-2












-2








-2









This question already has an answer here:



  • Failed to fetch jessie backports repository

    4 answers



I get the following output (and error at the end) when I run apt update on my system:



$ sudo apt update
Ign:1 http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch InRelease
Hit:2 http://packages.microsoft.com/repos/vscode stable InRelease
Ign:3 http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb stable InRelease
Hit:4 http://security.debian.org/debian-security stable/updates InRelease
Hit:6 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stable-updates InRelease
Hit:7 http://fai-project.org/download stretch InRelease
Hit:8 http://repository.spotify.com stable InRelease
Hit:9 http://deb.debian.org/debian-security stretch/updates InRelease
Hit:10 http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb stable Release
Hit:12 http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch-backports InRelease
Hit:13 https://download.docker.com/linux/debian stretch InRelease
Hit:14 https://deb.nodesource.com/node_10.x stretch InRelease
Ign:15 http://deb.debian.org/debian stable InRelease
Ign:17 http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-backports InRelease
Ign:18 http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie InRelease
Hit:19 http://deb.debian.org/debian testing InRelease
Hit:5 https://release.memsql.com/production/debian memsql InRelease
Hit:20 http://deb.debian.org/debian unstable InRelease
Hit:21 http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch Release
Hit:11 https://packagecloud.io/slacktechnologies/slack/debian jessie InRelease
Hit:23 http://deb.debian.org/debian stable Release
Err:25 http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-backports Release
404 Not Found [IP: 151.101.248.204 80]
Hit:26 http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie Release
Reading package lists... Done
E: The repository 'http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-backports Release' does no longer have a Release file.
N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default.
N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details.


I don't understand why I'm getting this error.



$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list
# These lines should work for many sites

deb http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch main contrib non-free
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian-security stretch/updates main contrib non-free
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch-backports main contrib non-free

# repository that may contain newer fai packages for stretch
deb [trusted=yes] http://fai-project.org/download stretch koeln

$ grep jessie-backports /etc/apt/sources.list.d/*
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list:deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie-backports main contrib non-free
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list:# deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie-backports main contrib non-free
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list.save:deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie-backports main contrib non-free
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list.save:# deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie-backports main contrib non-free


Some system information:



$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Debian
Description: Debian GNU/Linux 9.8 (stretch)
Release: 9.8
Codename: stretch









share|improve this question









New contributor




David Gomes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













This question already has an answer here:



  • Failed to fetch jessie backports repository

    4 answers



I get the following output (and error at the end) when I run apt update on my system:



$ sudo apt update
Ign:1 http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch InRelease
Hit:2 http://packages.microsoft.com/repos/vscode stable InRelease
Ign:3 http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb stable InRelease
Hit:4 http://security.debian.org/debian-security stable/updates InRelease
Hit:6 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stable-updates InRelease
Hit:7 http://fai-project.org/download stretch InRelease
Hit:8 http://repository.spotify.com stable InRelease
Hit:9 http://deb.debian.org/debian-security stretch/updates InRelease
Hit:10 http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb stable Release
Hit:12 http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch-backports InRelease
Hit:13 https://download.docker.com/linux/debian stretch InRelease
Hit:14 https://deb.nodesource.com/node_10.x stretch InRelease
Ign:15 http://deb.debian.org/debian stable InRelease
Ign:17 http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-backports InRelease
Ign:18 http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie InRelease
Hit:19 http://deb.debian.org/debian testing InRelease
Hit:5 https://release.memsql.com/production/debian memsql InRelease
Hit:20 http://deb.debian.org/debian unstable InRelease
Hit:21 http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch Release
Hit:11 https://packagecloud.io/slacktechnologies/slack/debian jessie InRelease
Hit:23 http://deb.debian.org/debian stable Release
Err:25 http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-backports Release
404 Not Found [IP: 151.101.248.204 80]
Hit:26 http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie Release
Reading package lists... Done
E: The repository 'http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-backports Release' does no longer have a Release file.
N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default.
N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details.


I don't understand why I'm getting this error.



$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list
# These lines should work for many sites

deb http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch main contrib non-free
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian-security stretch/updates main contrib non-free
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch-backports main contrib non-free

# repository that may contain newer fai packages for stretch
deb [trusted=yes] http://fai-project.org/download stretch koeln

$ grep jessie-backports /etc/apt/sources.list.d/*
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list:deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie-backports main contrib non-free
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list:# deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie-backports main contrib non-free
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list.save:deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie-backports main contrib non-free
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list.save:# deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie-backports main contrib non-free


Some system information:



$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Debian
Description: Debian GNU/Linux 9.8 (stretch)
Release: 9.8
Codename: stretch




This question already has an answer here:



  • Failed to fetch jessie backports repository

    4 answers







debian






share|improve this question









New contributor




David Gomes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




David Gomes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday







David Gomes













New contributor




David Gomes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









David GomesDavid Gomes

1002




1002




New contributor




David Gomes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





David Gomes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






David Gomes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




marked as duplicate by A.B, GAD3R, jimmij, nwildner, Kusalananda♦ 9 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by A.B, GAD3R, jimmij, nwildner, Kusalananda♦ 9 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









  • 6





    Look at /etc/apt/sources.list.d/.

    – Ipor Sircer
    yesterday












  • @IporSircer I updated the question to include some information from that directory as well.

    – David Gomes
    yesterday











  • I notice the use of [trusted=yes] on a non-https URL, rather than following the documentation on how to retrieve the correct signature key. This probably exposes you to a man-in-the-middle malware package injection anywhere in the path (so for example especially bad if it's a laptop on the move).

    – A.B
    yesterday













  • 6





    Look at /etc/apt/sources.list.d/.

    – Ipor Sircer
    yesterday












  • @IporSircer I updated the question to include some information from that directory as well.

    – David Gomes
    yesterday











  • I notice the use of [trusted=yes] on a non-https URL, rather than following the documentation on how to retrieve the correct signature key. This probably exposes you to a man-in-the-middle malware package injection anywhere in the path (so for example especially bad if it's a laptop on the move).

    – A.B
    yesterday








6




6





Look at /etc/apt/sources.list.d/.

– Ipor Sircer
yesterday






Look at /etc/apt/sources.list.d/.

– Ipor Sircer
yesterday














@IporSircer I updated the question to include some information from that directory as well.

– David Gomes
yesterday





@IporSircer I updated the question to include some information from that directory as well.

– David Gomes
yesterday













I notice the use of [trusted=yes] on a non-https URL, rather than following the documentation on how to retrieve the correct signature key. This probably exposes you to a man-in-the-middle malware package injection anywhere in the path (so for example especially bad if it's a laptop on the move).

– A.B
yesterday






I notice the use of [trusted=yes] on a non-https URL, rather than following the documentation on how to retrieve the correct signature key. This probably exposes you to a man-in-the-middle malware package injection anywhere in the path (so for example especially bad if it's a laptop on the move).

– A.B
yesterday











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0














Since Jessie is no longer the most recent stable release for Debian (Stretch is) I believe they no longer support jessie-backports. It is now stretch-backports. It is not very safe to run stretch-backports on a jessie based machine since stretch-backports are recompiled based on what's available in Stretch. Unfortunately your options are:



  1. upgrade to stretch

  2. remove jessie-backports (which appears to be in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/)





share|improve this answer








New contributor




Carl Sverre is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1





    Welcome, The debian release is Stretch (lsb_release -a), mixed with jessie, jessie-backports , unstable and packagecloud jessie repo.

    – GAD3R
    yesterday


















0














A Debian version has five phases in its life cycle:



  • testing: the version is in development, and has no backports or security archive

  • stable: the version is now released, and a backports and security archive are created

  • oldstable: the next version after this one is released. The security support is still maintained by the security team for all architectures, and the backports archive is still supported, until a year after it became oldstable.

  • long-term support (LTS): a year after the release of the next version of Debian, the security team stops supporting this version, and the LTS team takes over. The LTS team does not support backports, and it does not support all architectures; only a limited list of architectures is supported. Additionally, not all packages are supported during the LTS phase; notably, things like webbrowsers etc are explicitly not supported (but there are many other things).

  • No longer supported: the LTS phase ends 5 years after the original release of that version; at that point, the version is moved to archive.debian.org

Jessie has become oldstable on June 17th 2017, and therefore became LTS on June 17th 2018. As such, the jessie-backports repository is now dormant. It was retained for a while to allow for certain valid use cases, but the backports administrators have recently done some maintenance work, and disabled the jessie-backports repository; that is the reason you are now getting those errors.



The backports repository is meant to contain software versions that are available in the next version of Debian; i.e., jessie-backports will contain packages with versions as shipped in stretch. As such, if you have already moved to stretch as you claim to, enabling jessie-backports on your system should provide no benefit at all, and you should just stick with the stretch repository and move on from jessie.






share|improve this answer





























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    Since Jessie is no longer the most recent stable release for Debian (Stretch is) I believe they no longer support jessie-backports. It is now stretch-backports. It is not very safe to run stretch-backports on a jessie based machine since stretch-backports are recompiled based on what's available in Stretch. Unfortunately your options are:



    1. upgrade to stretch

    2. remove jessie-backports (which appears to be in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/)





    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Carl Sverre is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.















    • 1





      Welcome, The debian release is Stretch (lsb_release -a), mixed with jessie, jessie-backports , unstable and packagecloud jessie repo.

      – GAD3R
      yesterday















    0














    Since Jessie is no longer the most recent stable release for Debian (Stretch is) I believe they no longer support jessie-backports. It is now stretch-backports. It is not very safe to run stretch-backports on a jessie based machine since stretch-backports are recompiled based on what's available in Stretch. Unfortunately your options are:



    1. upgrade to stretch

    2. remove jessie-backports (which appears to be in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/)





    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Carl Sverre is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.















    • 1





      Welcome, The debian release is Stretch (lsb_release -a), mixed with jessie, jessie-backports , unstable and packagecloud jessie repo.

      – GAD3R
      yesterday













    0












    0








    0







    Since Jessie is no longer the most recent stable release for Debian (Stretch is) I believe they no longer support jessie-backports. It is now stretch-backports. It is not very safe to run stretch-backports on a jessie based machine since stretch-backports are recompiled based on what's available in Stretch. Unfortunately your options are:



    1. upgrade to stretch

    2. remove jessie-backports (which appears to be in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/)





    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Carl Sverre is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.










    Since Jessie is no longer the most recent stable release for Debian (Stretch is) I believe they no longer support jessie-backports. It is now stretch-backports. It is not very safe to run stretch-backports on a jessie based machine since stretch-backports are recompiled based on what's available in Stretch. Unfortunately your options are:



    1. upgrade to stretch

    2. remove jessie-backports (which appears to be in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/)






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Carl Sverre is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer






    New contributor




    Carl Sverre is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    answered yesterday









    Carl SverreCarl Sverre

    1011




    1011




    New contributor




    Carl Sverre is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    New contributor





    Carl Sverre is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    Carl Sverre is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    • 1





      Welcome, The debian release is Stretch (lsb_release -a), mixed with jessie, jessie-backports , unstable and packagecloud jessie repo.

      – GAD3R
      yesterday












    • 1





      Welcome, The debian release is Stretch (lsb_release -a), mixed with jessie, jessie-backports , unstable and packagecloud jessie repo.

      – GAD3R
      yesterday







    1




    1





    Welcome, The debian release is Stretch (lsb_release -a), mixed with jessie, jessie-backports , unstable and packagecloud jessie repo.

    – GAD3R
    yesterday





    Welcome, The debian release is Stretch (lsb_release -a), mixed with jessie, jessie-backports , unstable and packagecloud jessie repo.

    – GAD3R
    yesterday













    0














    A Debian version has five phases in its life cycle:



    • testing: the version is in development, and has no backports or security archive

    • stable: the version is now released, and a backports and security archive are created

    • oldstable: the next version after this one is released. The security support is still maintained by the security team for all architectures, and the backports archive is still supported, until a year after it became oldstable.

    • long-term support (LTS): a year after the release of the next version of Debian, the security team stops supporting this version, and the LTS team takes over. The LTS team does not support backports, and it does not support all architectures; only a limited list of architectures is supported. Additionally, not all packages are supported during the LTS phase; notably, things like webbrowsers etc are explicitly not supported (but there are many other things).

    • No longer supported: the LTS phase ends 5 years after the original release of that version; at that point, the version is moved to archive.debian.org

    Jessie has become oldstable on June 17th 2017, and therefore became LTS on June 17th 2018. As such, the jessie-backports repository is now dormant. It was retained for a while to allow for certain valid use cases, but the backports administrators have recently done some maintenance work, and disabled the jessie-backports repository; that is the reason you are now getting those errors.



    The backports repository is meant to contain software versions that are available in the next version of Debian; i.e., jessie-backports will contain packages with versions as shipped in stretch. As such, if you have already moved to stretch as you claim to, enabling jessie-backports on your system should provide no benefit at all, and you should just stick with the stretch repository and move on from jessie.






    share|improve this answer



























      0














      A Debian version has five phases in its life cycle:



      • testing: the version is in development, and has no backports or security archive

      • stable: the version is now released, and a backports and security archive are created

      • oldstable: the next version after this one is released. The security support is still maintained by the security team for all architectures, and the backports archive is still supported, until a year after it became oldstable.

      • long-term support (LTS): a year after the release of the next version of Debian, the security team stops supporting this version, and the LTS team takes over. The LTS team does not support backports, and it does not support all architectures; only a limited list of architectures is supported. Additionally, not all packages are supported during the LTS phase; notably, things like webbrowsers etc are explicitly not supported (but there are many other things).

      • No longer supported: the LTS phase ends 5 years after the original release of that version; at that point, the version is moved to archive.debian.org

      Jessie has become oldstable on June 17th 2017, and therefore became LTS on June 17th 2018. As such, the jessie-backports repository is now dormant. It was retained for a while to allow for certain valid use cases, but the backports administrators have recently done some maintenance work, and disabled the jessie-backports repository; that is the reason you are now getting those errors.



      The backports repository is meant to contain software versions that are available in the next version of Debian; i.e., jessie-backports will contain packages with versions as shipped in stretch. As such, if you have already moved to stretch as you claim to, enabling jessie-backports on your system should provide no benefit at all, and you should just stick with the stretch repository and move on from jessie.






      share|improve this answer

























        0












        0








        0







        A Debian version has five phases in its life cycle:



        • testing: the version is in development, and has no backports or security archive

        • stable: the version is now released, and a backports and security archive are created

        • oldstable: the next version after this one is released. The security support is still maintained by the security team for all architectures, and the backports archive is still supported, until a year after it became oldstable.

        • long-term support (LTS): a year after the release of the next version of Debian, the security team stops supporting this version, and the LTS team takes over. The LTS team does not support backports, and it does not support all architectures; only a limited list of architectures is supported. Additionally, not all packages are supported during the LTS phase; notably, things like webbrowsers etc are explicitly not supported (but there are many other things).

        • No longer supported: the LTS phase ends 5 years after the original release of that version; at that point, the version is moved to archive.debian.org

        Jessie has become oldstable on June 17th 2017, and therefore became LTS on June 17th 2018. As such, the jessie-backports repository is now dormant. It was retained for a while to allow for certain valid use cases, but the backports administrators have recently done some maintenance work, and disabled the jessie-backports repository; that is the reason you are now getting those errors.



        The backports repository is meant to contain software versions that are available in the next version of Debian; i.e., jessie-backports will contain packages with versions as shipped in stretch. As such, if you have already moved to stretch as you claim to, enabling jessie-backports on your system should provide no benefit at all, and you should just stick with the stretch repository and move on from jessie.






        share|improve this answer













        A Debian version has five phases in its life cycle:



        • testing: the version is in development, and has no backports or security archive

        • stable: the version is now released, and a backports and security archive are created

        • oldstable: the next version after this one is released. The security support is still maintained by the security team for all architectures, and the backports archive is still supported, until a year after it became oldstable.

        • long-term support (LTS): a year after the release of the next version of Debian, the security team stops supporting this version, and the LTS team takes over. The LTS team does not support backports, and it does not support all architectures; only a limited list of architectures is supported. Additionally, not all packages are supported during the LTS phase; notably, things like webbrowsers etc are explicitly not supported (but there are many other things).

        • No longer supported: the LTS phase ends 5 years after the original release of that version; at that point, the version is moved to archive.debian.org

        Jessie has become oldstable on June 17th 2017, and therefore became LTS on June 17th 2018. As such, the jessie-backports repository is now dormant. It was retained for a while to allow for certain valid use cases, but the backports administrators have recently done some maintenance work, and disabled the jessie-backports repository; that is the reason you are now getting those errors.



        The backports repository is meant to contain software versions that are available in the next version of Debian; i.e., jessie-backports will contain packages with versions as shipped in stretch. As such, if you have already moved to stretch as you claim to, enabling jessie-backports on your system should provide no benefit at all, and you should just stick with the stretch repository and move on from jessie.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 11 hours ago









        Wouter VerhelstWouter Verhelst

        7,544935




        7,544935













            -debian

            Popular posts from this blog

            Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god existsWord for having a definite opinion while simultaneously withholding judgment?What's the opposite of “newcomer? Is ”veteran" OK?What do you call an “atheist” who might believe in an afterlife?What's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Word for someone who dismisses contrary opinions as irrational?Somone who thinks they are overly special/out of the ordinaryIs there a word, phrase or idiom for “a person who is incapable of thinking about the future”?The belief that a god is human-likeA word for a non-famous person/thing you have heard a lot aboutAdjective for a person who enjoys taking care of their appearance

            2017 IndyCar Series Contents Series news Teams and drivers Schedule Season summary Footnotes References External links Navigation menu"INDYCAR: Initial 2018 bodywork concepts unveiled"the original"IndyCar confirms switch to Performance Friction brakes in 2017""AJ Foyt Racing will switch to Chevy"the original"Carlos Munoz, Conor Daly will drive for AJ Foyt Racing""Zach Veach's Indy 500 Debut Confirmed with Foyt""No mass exodus from Honda after Ganassi switch""Ex-F1 driver Sato joins Andretti Autosport for 2017 IndyCar season""IndyCar's Ryan Hunter-Reay, sponsor DHL paired through 2020""hhgregg and Andretti Autosport announce partnership for key races in 2016""INDYCAR: Rossi re-signs with Andretti"the original"McLaren Formula 1 - Fernando Alonso to race at Indy 500 with McLaren, Honda and Andretti Autosport""Shank will finally take part in Indy 500 with Harvey, Andretti | MotorSportsTalk""Andretti adds Jack Harvey to Indy 500 field""Ganassi switches to Honda power for 2017""INDYCAR: Chilton returns to Ganassi"the original"IndyCar silly season: Who's going where in 2017?""INDYCAR: Kanaan, NTT Data return to Ganassi"the original"Kimball to remain at Ganassi for 2017""Coyne confirms Bourdais for 2017 IndyCar season""Davison to sub for Bourdais in Indy 500"the original"Gutierrez confirmed for Detroit IndyCar debut""Gutierrez returns with Coyne for rest of 2017 season""Vautier to drive for Coyne at Texas"the original"INDYCAR: Coyne confirms Jones for 2017"the original"Pippa Mann returns to Coyne for Indy 500""Karam, Dreyer & Reinbold teaming up again for Indianapolis 500""Pigot to return to Ed Carpenter Racing""Hildebrand confirmed as full-time Ed Carpenter driver""Veach to replace injured Hildebrand at Barber"the originalNew Team Harding Racing Enters Chaves for 101st Indianapolis 500"Juncos Racing Announces Entry in 101st Running of the Indianapolis 500 :: Juncos Racing""Juncos confirms Pigot for Indy 500""Saavedra confirmed in Juncos' second 500 entry"the original"Lazier confirms Indy 500 run after son's USF2000 debut"the original"Claman DeMelo to race for RLLR at Sonoma"the original"Rahal signs Servia and ace engineer for 2017""IndyCar: Aleshin returns with Schmidt"the original"Aleshin replaced by Saavedra for Toronto""Jack Harvey will pilot SPM No. 7 car at Watkins Glen, Sonoma""Jay Howard confirmed in Tony Stewart's supported SPM Indy entry""INDYCAR: Newgarden to wave the flag at Penske"the original"Pagenaud opts for No. 1 in 2017"the original"Penske confirms Newgarden for 2017""Montoya to stay with Team Penske in 2017""Target leaving IndyCar after 27 seasons with Chip Ganassi""Cavin: IndyCar could see complete driver/team shakeup in 2017""End of the road for KV Racing?""KV Racing confirms closure, equipment sold to Juncos""Juncos confirms IndyCar Series entry"the original"Juncos readies IndyCar program, aims for '17 500"the original"Harding Racing to add Texas, Pocono to schedule"the original"Sato signs with Andretti Autosport for 2017""INDYCAR: Aleshin in Doubt at SPM"the original"Long Beach notebook: JR Hildebrand breaks hand""Hildebrand cleared to return at Phoenix"the original"Bourdais to undergo surgery on multiple fractures""Aleshin loses Schmidt Peterson IndyCar ride""Saavedra in at SPM for Pocono, Gateway"the original"Bourdais to make return at Gateway"the original"The IndyCar Grand Prix no longer is sponsored by Angie's List""2017 IndyCar Series rulebook""2017 Verizon IndyCar Series Official Rulebook"Official websiteeeeee

            Can I sign legal documents with a smiley face?Do Legal Documents Require Signing In Standard Pen Colors?Is it possible to legally prohibit someone from linking to specific pages on your website?Do scans of signed documents have the same legal power as the original document?What can I do if I signed an excessively restrictive contract?Can other party sneak in new contract terms via termination notice?How to prove that someone forged my signature on a contract that I was not aware of?In Australia, Is it legal to sign a document as somebody else?making a contract that includes video licenceLease dispute, over email and text messageIf you must include all of the natural language prose in a legal document, or if it can be abstracted outE-signing: legal ramifications of “identifying” a person