How to repeat loop n times in BashBash File existence test is always trueCount number of times each line repeats itself, In case Insensitive mannerHow can I break out of a while loop, from within a nested case statement?while read loopHow to allow a bash shell script to loop for 3 retries before exiting (prompt for username/password)using else if in a bash alias(homework)I am writing an If then else to check for specific numeric value in a fileRepeat 3000 times a sequence of characters “OW HW1 HW2” in a columnHow do I loop an if statement in bash?write a shell script to change the file permission from read and write to read,write and execute permissions

Can one live in the U.S. and not use a credit card?

Create chunks from an array

Cycles on the torus

Why do phishing e-mails use faked e-mail addresses instead of the real one?

Automaton recognizing ambiguously accepted words of another automaton

What would be the most expensive material to an intergalactic society?

Are all players supposed to be able to see each others' character sheets?

What is this tube in a jet engine's air intake?

What does the Digital Threat scope actually do?

How should I solve this integral with changing parameters?

Traveling to heavily polluted city, what practical measures can I take to minimize impact?

"If + would" conditional in present perfect tense

Help! My Character is too much for her story!

Is "cogitate" used appropriately in "I cogitate that success relies on hard work"?

How do we create new idioms and use them in a novel?

Under what conditions can the right to remain silent be revoked in the USA?

What does *dead* mean in *What do you mean, dead?*?

Are these two graphs isomorphic? Why/Why not?

What should I do when a paper is published similar to my PhD thesis without citation?

Why restrict private health insurance?

Will expression retain the same definition if particle is changed?

When an outsider describes family relationships, which point of view are they using?

Short scifi story where reproductive organs are converted to produce "materials", pregnant protagonist is "found fit" to be a mother

Called into a meeting and told we are being made redundant (laid off) and "not to share outside". Can I tell my partner?



How to repeat loop n times in Bash


Bash File existence test is always trueCount number of times each line repeats itself, In case Insensitive mannerHow can I break out of a while loop, from within a nested case statement?while read loopHow to allow a bash shell script to loop for 3 retries before exiting (prompt for username/password)using else if in a bash alias(homework)I am writing an If then else to check for specific numeric value in a fileRepeat 3000 times a sequence of characters “OW HW1 HW2” in a columnHow do I loop an if statement in bash?write a shell script to change the file permission from read and write to read,write and execute permissions













6















I have below scenario like:



if [file exists]; then
exit
elif
recheck if file exist (max 10 times)
if found exit else recheck again as per counter
fi









share|improve this question
























  • This is a very basic feature in shells. Did you even research it?

    – Peschke
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:03











  • Yes. But not getting expected output from my code. Also want to write as abbreviated as possible

    – Rocky86
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:05






  • 1





    @Peschke, well, they'd need at least what, three basic features (loops, conditionals, testing the file, breaking out of a loop). At least the question is quite clear as it is. Though it could contain a sketch of what Rocky tried, but then someone would rewrite it full in the answers anyway. ;)

    – ilkkachu
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:07















6















I have below scenario like:



if [file exists]; then
exit
elif
recheck if file exist (max 10 times)
if found exit else recheck again as per counter
fi









share|improve this question
























  • This is a very basic feature in shells. Did you even research it?

    – Peschke
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:03











  • Yes. But not getting expected output from my code. Also want to write as abbreviated as possible

    – Rocky86
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:05






  • 1





    @Peschke, well, they'd need at least what, three basic features (loops, conditionals, testing the file, breaking out of a loop). At least the question is quite clear as it is. Though it could contain a sketch of what Rocky tried, but then someone would rewrite it full in the answers anyway. ;)

    – ilkkachu
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:07













6












6








6








I have below scenario like:



if [file exists]; then
exit
elif
recheck if file exist (max 10 times)
if found exit else recheck again as per counter
fi









share|improve this question
















I have below scenario like:



if [file exists]; then
exit
elif
recheck if file exist (max 10 times)
if found exit else recheck again as per counter
fi






bash shell-script






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 20 mins ago









Rui F Ribeiro

41.3k1481140




41.3k1481140










asked Aug 5 '18 at 6:31









Rocky86Rocky86

7119




7119












  • This is a very basic feature in shells. Did you even research it?

    – Peschke
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:03











  • Yes. But not getting expected output from my code. Also want to write as abbreviated as possible

    – Rocky86
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:05






  • 1





    @Peschke, well, they'd need at least what, three basic features (loops, conditionals, testing the file, breaking out of a loop). At least the question is quite clear as it is. Though it could contain a sketch of what Rocky tried, but then someone would rewrite it full in the answers anyway. ;)

    – ilkkachu
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:07

















  • This is a very basic feature in shells. Did you even research it?

    – Peschke
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:03











  • Yes. But not getting expected output from my code. Also want to write as abbreviated as possible

    – Rocky86
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:05






  • 1





    @Peschke, well, they'd need at least what, three basic features (loops, conditionals, testing the file, breaking out of a loop). At least the question is quite clear as it is. Though it could contain a sketch of what Rocky tried, but then someone would rewrite it full in the answers anyway. ;)

    – ilkkachu
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:07
















This is a very basic feature in shells. Did you even research it?

– Peschke
Aug 5 '18 at 7:03





This is a very basic feature in shells. Did you even research it?

– Peschke
Aug 5 '18 at 7:03













Yes. But not getting expected output from my code. Also want to write as abbreviated as possible

– Rocky86
Aug 5 '18 at 7:05





Yes. But not getting expected output from my code. Also want to write as abbreviated as possible

– Rocky86
Aug 5 '18 at 7:05




1




1





@Peschke, well, they'd need at least what, three basic features (loops, conditionals, testing the file, breaking out of a loop). At least the question is quite clear as it is. Though it could contain a sketch of what Rocky tried, but then someone would rewrite it full in the answers anyway. ;)

– ilkkachu
Aug 5 '18 at 7:07





@Peschke, well, they'd need at least what, three basic features (loops, conditionals, testing the file, breaking out of a loop). At least the question is quite clear as it is. Though it could contain a sketch of what Rocky tried, but then someone would rewrite it full in the answers anyway. ;)

– ilkkachu
Aug 5 '18 at 7:07










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















7














There are many ways to do this loop.



With ksh93 syntax (also supported by zsh and bash):



for (( i=0; i<10; ++i)); do
[ -e filename ] && break
sleep 10
done


For any POSIX-like shell:



n=0
while [ "$n" -lt 10 ] && [ ! -e filename ]; do
n=$(( n + 1 ))
sleep 10
done


Both of the loops sleep 10 seconds in each iteration before testing the existence of the file again.



After the loop has finished, you will have to test for existence of the file a last time to figure out whether the loop exited due to running 10 times or due to the file appearing.



If you wish, and if you have access to inotify-tools, you may replace the sleep 10 call with



inotifywait -q -t 10 -e create ./ >/dev/null


This would wait for a file creation event to occur in the current directory, but would time out after 10 seconds. This way your loop would exit as soon as the given filename appeared (if it appeared).



The full code, with inotifywait (replace with sleep 10 if you don't want that), may look like



for (( i=0; i<10; ++i)); do
[ -e filename ] && break
inotifywait -q -t 10 -e create ./ >/dev/null
done

if [ -e filename ]; then
echo 'file appeared!'
else
echo 'file did not turn up in time'
fi





share|improve this answer

























  • With inotify, you could almost replace the whole loop. Just test if the file is there, and if not, inotifywait for a 100 seconds. Almost, since the file could be created just between the test and the inotify, and you'd sleep for the full 100 seconds before timing out...

    – ilkkachu
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:12






  • 1





    @ilkkachu Yes, that's a good idea, but here I'm just using inotifywait as a drop-in replacement for sleep.

    – Kusalananda
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:15


















3














If the count is not a variable you can use brace expansion:



for i in 1..10 # you can also use 0..9
do
whatever
done


If the count is a variable you can use the seq command:



count=10
for i in $(seq $count)
do
whatever
done





share|improve this answer























  • I want to loop only if file is not found (max. 10 times). If found lets say 3rd time then exit successfully

    – Rocky86
    Aug 5 '18 at 6:49











  • @Rocky86 : This does not contradict the solution proposed by xenoid. Nobody forces you to count until the end ....

    – user1934428
    Aug 6 '18 at 9:46


















0














n=0
until [ "$((n+=1))" -gt 10 ]
do <exists? command exit
done
echo oh noes!


though test -e file && exit is more flexible






share|improve this answer























  • Why the question mark? Note that the behaviour for globs in the target of redirections varies between shells.

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Aug 5 '18 at 6:57






  • 2





    Note that it has the side effect of opening the file, which for fifos for instance can be quite bad (worse with a symlink to /dev/watchdog on Linux for instance)

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Aug 5 '18 at 6:58











  • Even in Bash, where this would look for a file like exists1 or such, it still prints a bunch of errors if/when a matching file isn't found. (Also it errors if there are multiple matches.) Any other shell I tested seems to give errors in any case...

    – ilkkachu
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:01











  • @ikkachu - yeah. that was kinda the point. if the error happens, the script reports. if stderr should be suppressed, suppress it done 2<>/dev/null. does bash does that scripted? i thought it only effed that up in an -interactive context. still, exists? is as much as a filler name as file. but yeah, i hate quoting in redirects - if screws so much up.

    – mikeserv
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:19












  • @Stéphane - no reason, really. but yeah, fifos, unreadables... thats why i noted test -e.

    – mikeserv
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:22










Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460595%2fhow-to-repeat-loop-n-times-in-bash%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7














There are many ways to do this loop.



With ksh93 syntax (also supported by zsh and bash):



for (( i=0; i<10; ++i)); do
[ -e filename ] && break
sleep 10
done


For any POSIX-like shell:



n=0
while [ "$n" -lt 10 ] && [ ! -e filename ]; do
n=$(( n + 1 ))
sleep 10
done


Both of the loops sleep 10 seconds in each iteration before testing the existence of the file again.



After the loop has finished, you will have to test for existence of the file a last time to figure out whether the loop exited due to running 10 times or due to the file appearing.



If you wish, and if you have access to inotify-tools, you may replace the sleep 10 call with



inotifywait -q -t 10 -e create ./ >/dev/null


This would wait for a file creation event to occur in the current directory, but would time out after 10 seconds. This way your loop would exit as soon as the given filename appeared (if it appeared).



The full code, with inotifywait (replace with sleep 10 if you don't want that), may look like



for (( i=0; i<10; ++i)); do
[ -e filename ] && break
inotifywait -q -t 10 -e create ./ >/dev/null
done

if [ -e filename ]; then
echo 'file appeared!'
else
echo 'file did not turn up in time'
fi





share|improve this answer

























  • With inotify, you could almost replace the whole loop. Just test if the file is there, and if not, inotifywait for a 100 seconds. Almost, since the file could be created just between the test and the inotify, and you'd sleep for the full 100 seconds before timing out...

    – ilkkachu
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:12






  • 1





    @ilkkachu Yes, that's a good idea, but here I'm just using inotifywait as a drop-in replacement for sleep.

    – Kusalananda
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:15















7














There are many ways to do this loop.



With ksh93 syntax (also supported by zsh and bash):



for (( i=0; i<10; ++i)); do
[ -e filename ] && break
sleep 10
done


For any POSIX-like shell:



n=0
while [ "$n" -lt 10 ] && [ ! -e filename ]; do
n=$(( n + 1 ))
sleep 10
done


Both of the loops sleep 10 seconds in each iteration before testing the existence of the file again.



After the loop has finished, you will have to test for existence of the file a last time to figure out whether the loop exited due to running 10 times or due to the file appearing.



If you wish, and if you have access to inotify-tools, you may replace the sleep 10 call with



inotifywait -q -t 10 -e create ./ >/dev/null


This would wait for a file creation event to occur in the current directory, but would time out after 10 seconds. This way your loop would exit as soon as the given filename appeared (if it appeared).



The full code, with inotifywait (replace with sleep 10 if you don't want that), may look like



for (( i=0; i<10; ++i)); do
[ -e filename ] && break
inotifywait -q -t 10 -e create ./ >/dev/null
done

if [ -e filename ]; then
echo 'file appeared!'
else
echo 'file did not turn up in time'
fi





share|improve this answer

























  • With inotify, you could almost replace the whole loop. Just test if the file is there, and if not, inotifywait for a 100 seconds. Almost, since the file could be created just between the test and the inotify, and you'd sleep for the full 100 seconds before timing out...

    – ilkkachu
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:12






  • 1





    @ilkkachu Yes, that's a good idea, but here I'm just using inotifywait as a drop-in replacement for sleep.

    – Kusalananda
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:15













7












7








7







There are many ways to do this loop.



With ksh93 syntax (also supported by zsh and bash):



for (( i=0; i<10; ++i)); do
[ -e filename ] && break
sleep 10
done


For any POSIX-like shell:



n=0
while [ "$n" -lt 10 ] && [ ! -e filename ]; do
n=$(( n + 1 ))
sleep 10
done


Both of the loops sleep 10 seconds in each iteration before testing the existence of the file again.



After the loop has finished, you will have to test for existence of the file a last time to figure out whether the loop exited due to running 10 times or due to the file appearing.



If you wish, and if you have access to inotify-tools, you may replace the sleep 10 call with



inotifywait -q -t 10 -e create ./ >/dev/null


This would wait for a file creation event to occur in the current directory, but would time out after 10 seconds. This way your loop would exit as soon as the given filename appeared (if it appeared).



The full code, with inotifywait (replace with sleep 10 if you don't want that), may look like



for (( i=0; i<10; ++i)); do
[ -e filename ] && break
inotifywait -q -t 10 -e create ./ >/dev/null
done

if [ -e filename ]; then
echo 'file appeared!'
else
echo 'file did not turn up in time'
fi





share|improve this answer















There are many ways to do this loop.



With ksh93 syntax (also supported by zsh and bash):



for (( i=0; i<10; ++i)); do
[ -e filename ] && break
sleep 10
done


For any POSIX-like shell:



n=0
while [ "$n" -lt 10 ] && [ ! -e filename ]; do
n=$(( n + 1 ))
sleep 10
done


Both of the loops sleep 10 seconds in each iteration before testing the existence of the file again.



After the loop has finished, you will have to test for existence of the file a last time to figure out whether the loop exited due to running 10 times or due to the file appearing.



If you wish, and if you have access to inotify-tools, you may replace the sleep 10 call with



inotifywait -q -t 10 -e create ./ >/dev/null


This would wait for a file creation event to occur in the current directory, but would time out after 10 seconds. This way your loop would exit as soon as the given filename appeared (if it appeared).



The full code, with inotifywait (replace with sleep 10 if you don't want that), may look like



for (( i=0; i<10; ++i)); do
[ -e filename ] && break
inotifywait -q -t 10 -e create ./ >/dev/null
done

if [ -e filename ]; then
echo 'file appeared!'
else
echo 'file did not turn up in time'
fi






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Aug 5 '18 at 7:54

























answered Aug 5 '18 at 6:37









KusalanandaKusalananda

134k17255418




134k17255418












  • With inotify, you could almost replace the whole loop. Just test if the file is there, and if not, inotifywait for a 100 seconds. Almost, since the file could be created just between the test and the inotify, and you'd sleep for the full 100 seconds before timing out...

    – ilkkachu
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:12






  • 1





    @ilkkachu Yes, that's a good idea, but here I'm just using inotifywait as a drop-in replacement for sleep.

    – Kusalananda
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:15

















  • With inotify, you could almost replace the whole loop. Just test if the file is there, and if not, inotifywait for a 100 seconds. Almost, since the file could be created just between the test and the inotify, and you'd sleep for the full 100 seconds before timing out...

    – ilkkachu
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:12






  • 1





    @ilkkachu Yes, that's a good idea, but here I'm just using inotifywait as a drop-in replacement for sleep.

    – Kusalananda
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:15
















With inotify, you could almost replace the whole loop. Just test if the file is there, and if not, inotifywait for a 100 seconds. Almost, since the file could be created just between the test and the inotify, and you'd sleep for the full 100 seconds before timing out...

– ilkkachu
Aug 5 '18 at 7:12





With inotify, you could almost replace the whole loop. Just test if the file is there, and if not, inotifywait for a 100 seconds. Almost, since the file could be created just between the test and the inotify, and you'd sleep for the full 100 seconds before timing out...

– ilkkachu
Aug 5 '18 at 7:12




1




1





@ilkkachu Yes, that's a good idea, but here I'm just using inotifywait as a drop-in replacement for sleep.

– Kusalananda
Aug 5 '18 at 7:15





@ilkkachu Yes, that's a good idea, but here I'm just using inotifywait as a drop-in replacement for sleep.

– Kusalananda
Aug 5 '18 at 7:15













3














If the count is not a variable you can use brace expansion:



for i in 1..10 # you can also use 0..9
do
whatever
done


If the count is a variable you can use the seq command:



count=10
for i in $(seq $count)
do
whatever
done





share|improve this answer























  • I want to loop only if file is not found (max. 10 times). If found lets say 3rd time then exit successfully

    – Rocky86
    Aug 5 '18 at 6:49











  • @Rocky86 : This does not contradict the solution proposed by xenoid. Nobody forces you to count until the end ....

    – user1934428
    Aug 6 '18 at 9:46















3














If the count is not a variable you can use brace expansion:



for i in 1..10 # you can also use 0..9
do
whatever
done


If the count is a variable you can use the seq command:



count=10
for i in $(seq $count)
do
whatever
done





share|improve this answer























  • I want to loop only if file is not found (max. 10 times). If found lets say 3rd time then exit successfully

    – Rocky86
    Aug 5 '18 at 6:49











  • @Rocky86 : This does not contradict the solution proposed by xenoid. Nobody forces you to count until the end ....

    – user1934428
    Aug 6 '18 at 9:46













3












3








3







If the count is not a variable you can use brace expansion:



for i in 1..10 # you can also use 0..9
do
whatever
done


If the count is a variable you can use the seq command:



count=10
for i in $(seq $count)
do
whatever
done





share|improve this answer













If the count is not a variable you can use brace expansion:



for i in 1..10 # you can also use 0..9
do
whatever
done


If the count is a variable you can use the seq command:



count=10
for i in $(seq $count)
do
whatever
done






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Aug 5 '18 at 6:47









xenoidxenoid

3,1601725




3,1601725












  • I want to loop only if file is not found (max. 10 times). If found lets say 3rd time then exit successfully

    – Rocky86
    Aug 5 '18 at 6:49











  • @Rocky86 : This does not contradict the solution proposed by xenoid. Nobody forces you to count until the end ....

    – user1934428
    Aug 6 '18 at 9:46

















  • I want to loop only if file is not found (max. 10 times). If found lets say 3rd time then exit successfully

    – Rocky86
    Aug 5 '18 at 6:49











  • @Rocky86 : This does not contradict the solution proposed by xenoid. Nobody forces you to count until the end ....

    – user1934428
    Aug 6 '18 at 9:46
















I want to loop only if file is not found (max. 10 times). If found lets say 3rd time then exit successfully

– Rocky86
Aug 5 '18 at 6:49





I want to loop only if file is not found (max. 10 times). If found lets say 3rd time then exit successfully

– Rocky86
Aug 5 '18 at 6:49













@Rocky86 : This does not contradict the solution proposed by xenoid. Nobody forces you to count until the end ....

– user1934428
Aug 6 '18 at 9:46





@Rocky86 : This does not contradict the solution proposed by xenoid. Nobody forces you to count until the end ....

– user1934428
Aug 6 '18 at 9:46











0














n=0
until [ "$((n+=1))" -gt 10 ]
do <exists? command exit
done
echo oh noes!


though test -e file && exit is more flexible






share|improve this answer























  • Why the question mark? Note that the behaviour for globs in the target of redirections varies between shells.

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Aug 5 '18 at 6:57






  • 2





    Note that it has the side effect of opening the file, which for fifos for instance can be quite bad (worse with a symlink to /dev/watchdog on Linux for instance)

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Aug 5 '18 at 6:58











  • Even in Bash, where this would look for a file like exists1 or such, it still prints a bunch of errors if/when a matching file isn't found. (Also it errors if there are multiple matches.) Any other shell I tested seems to give errors in any case...

    – ilkkachu
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:01











  • @ikkachu - yeah. that was kinda the point. if the error happens, the script reports. if stderr should be suppressed, suppress it done 2<>/dev/null. does bash does that scripted? i thought it only effed that up in an -interactive context. still, exists? is as much as a filler name as file. but yeah, i hate quoting in redirects - if screws so much up.

    – mikeserv
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:19












  • @Stéphane - no reason, really. but yeah, fifos, unreadables... thats why i noted test -e.

    – mikeserv
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:22















0














n=0
until [ "$((n+=1))" -gt 10 ]
do <exists? command exit
done
echo oh noes!


though test -e file && exit is more flexible






share|improve this answer























  • Why the question mark? Note that the behaviour for globs in the target of redirections varies between shells.

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Aug 5 '18 at 6:57






  • 2





    Note that it has the side effect of opening the file, which for fifos for instance can be quite bad (worse with a symlink to /dev/watchdog on Linux for instance)

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Aug 5 '18 at 6:58











  • Even in Bash, where this would look for a file like exists1 or such, it still prints a bunch of errors if/when a matching file isn't found. (Also it errors if there are multiple matches.) Any other shell I tested seems to give errors in any case...

    – ilkkachu
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:01











  • @ikkachu - yeah. that was kinda the point. if the error happens, the script reports. if stderr should be suppressed, suppress it done 2<>/dev/null. does bash does that scripted? i thought it only effed that up in an -interactive context. still, exists? is as much as a filler name as file. but yeah, i hate quoting in redirects - if screws so much up.

    – mikeserv
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:19












  • @Stéphane - no reason, really. but yeah, fifos, unreadables... thats why i noted test -e.

    – mikeserv
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:22













0












0








0







n=0
until [ "$((n+=1))" -gt 10 ]
do <exists? command exit
done
echo oh noes!


though test -e file && exit is more flexible






share|improve this answer













n=0
until [ "$((n+=1))" -gt 10 ]
do <exists? command exit
done
echo oh noes!


though test -e file && exit is more flexible







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Aug 5 '18 at 6:36









mikeservmikeserv

45.8k668160




45.8k668160












  • Why the question mark? Note that the behaviour for globs in the target of redirections varies between shells.

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Aug 5 '18 at 6:57






  • 2





    Note that it has the side effect of opening the file, which for fifos for instance can be quite bad (worse with a symlink to /dev/watchdog on Linux for instance)

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Aug 5 '18 at 6:58











  • Even in Bash, where this would look for a file like exists1 or such, it still prints a bunch of errors if/when a matching file isn't found. (Also it errors if there are multiple matches.) Any other shell I tested seems to give errors in any case...

    – ilkkachu
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:01











  • @ikkachu - yeah. that was kinda the point. if the error happens, the script reports. if stderr should be suppressed, suppress it done 2<>/dev/null. does bash does that scripted? i thought it only effed that up in an -interactive context. still, exists? is as much as a filler name as file. but yeah, i hate quoting in redirects - if screws so much up.

    – mikeserv
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:19












  • @Stéphane - no reason, really. but yeah, fifos, unreadables... thats why i noted test -e.

    – mikeserv
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:22

















  • Why the question mark? Note that the behaviour for globs in the target of redirections varies between shells.

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Aug 5 '18 at 6:57






  • 2





    Note that it has the side effect of opening the file, which for fifos for instance can be quite bad (worse with a symlink to /dev/watchdog on Linux for instance)

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Aug 5 '18 at 6:58











  • Even in Bash, where this would look for a file like exists1 or such, it still prints a bunch of errors if/when a matching file isn't found. (Also it errors if there are multiple matches.) Any other shell I tested seems to give errors in any case...

    – ilkkachu
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:01











  • @ikkachu - yeah. that was kinda the point. if the error happens, the script reports. if stderr should be suppressed, suppress it done 2<>/dev/null. does bash does that scripted? i thought it only effed that up in an -interactive context. still, exists? is as much as a filler name as file. but yeah, i hate quoting in redirects - if screws so much up.

    – mikeserv
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:19












  • @Stéphane - no reason, really. but yeah, fifos, unreadables... thats why i noted test -e.

    – mikeserv
    Aug 5 '18 at 7:22
















Why the question mark? Note that the behaviour for globs in the target of redirections varies between shells.

– Stéphane Chazelas
Aug 5 '18 at 6:57





Why the question mark? Note that the behaviour for globs in the target of redirections varies between shells.

– Stéphane Chazelas
Aug 5 '18 at 6:57




2




2





Note that it has the side effect of opening the file, which for fifos for instance can be quite bad (worse with a symlink to /dev/watchdog on Linux for instance)

– Stéphane Chazelas
Aug 5 '18 at 6:58





Note that it has the side effect of opening the file, which for fifos for instance can be quite bad (worse with a symlink to /dev/watchdog on Linux for instance)

– Stéphane Chazelas
Aug 5 '18 at 6:58













Even in Bash, where this would look for a file like exists1 or such, it still prints a bunch of errors if/when a matching file isn't found. (Also it errors if there are multiple matches.) Any other shell I tested seems to give errors in any case...

– ilkkachu
Aug 5 '18 at 7:01





Even in Bash, where this would look for a file like exists1 or such, it still prints a bunch of errors if/when a matching file isn't found. (Also it errors if there are multiple matches.) Any other shell I tested seems to give errors in any case...

– ilkkachu
Aug 5 '18 at 7:01













@ikkachu - yeah. that was kinda the point. if the error happens, the script reports. if stderr should be suppressed, suppress it done 2<>/dev/null. does bash does that scripted? i thought it only effed that up in an -interactive context. still, exists? is as much as a filler name as file. but yeah, i hate quoting in redirects - if screws so much up.

– mikeserv
Aug 5 '18 at 7:19






@ikkachu - yeah. that was kinda the point. if the error happens, the script reports. if stderr should be suppressed, suppress it done 2<>/dev/null. does bash does that scripted? i thought it only effed that up in an -interactive context. still, exists? is as much as a filler name as file. but yeah, i hate quoting in redirects - if screws so much up.

– mikeserv
Aug 5 '18 at 7:19














@Stéphane - no reason, really. but yeah, fifos, unreadables... thats why i noted test -e.

– mikeserv
Aug 5 '18 at 7:22





@Stéphane - no reason, really. but yeah, fifos, unreadables... thats why i noted test -e.

– mikeserv
Aug 5 '18 at 7:22

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460595%2fhow-to-repeat-loop-n-times-in-bash%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Mobil Contents History Mobil brands Former Mobil brands Lukoil transaction Mobil UK Mobil Australia Mobil New Zealand Mobil Greece Mobil in Japan Mobil in Canada Mobil Egypt See also References External links Navigation menuwww.mobil.com"Mobil Corporation"the original"Our Houston campus""Business & Finance: Socony-Vacuum Corp.""Popular Mechanics""Lubrite Technologies""Exxon Mobil campus 'clearly happening'""Toledo Blade - Google News Archive Search""The Lion and the Moose - How 2 Executives Pulled off the Biggest Merger Ever""ExxonMobil Press Release""Lubricants""Archived copy"the original"Mobil 1™ and Mobil Super™ motor oil and synthetic motor oil - Mobil™ Motor Oils""Mobil Delvac""Mobil Industrial website""The State of Competition in Gasoline Marketing: The Effects of Refiner Operations at Retail""Mobil Travel Guide to become Forbes Travel Guide""Hotel Rankings: Forbes Merges with Mobil"the original"Jamieson oil industry history""Mobil news""Caltex pumps for control""Watchdog blocks Caltex bid""Exxon Mobil sells service station network""Mobil Oil New Zealand Limited is New Zealand's oldest oil company, with predecessor companies having first established a presence in the country in 1896""ExxonMobil subsidiaries have a business history in New Zealand stretching back more than 120 years. We are involved in petroleum refining and distribution and the marketing of fuels, lubricants and chemical products""Archived copy"the original"Exxon Mobil to Sell Its Japanese Arm for $3.9 Billion""Gas station merger will end Esso and Mobil's long run in Japan""Esso moves to affiliate itself with PC Optimum, no longer Aeroplan, in loyalty point switch""Mobil brand of gas stations to launch in Canada after deal for 213 Loblaws-owned locations""Mobil Nears Completion of Rebranding 200 Loblaw Gas Stations""Learn about ExxonMobil's operations in Egypt""Petrol and Diesel Service Stations in Egypt - Mobil"Official websiteExxon Mobil corporate websiteMobil Industrial official websiteeeeeeeeDA04275022275790-40000 0001 0860 5061n82045453134887257134887257

Frič See also Navigation menuinternal link

Identify plant with long narrow paired leaves and reddish stems Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?What is this plant with long sharp leaves? Is it a weed?What is this 3ft high, stalky plant, with mid sized narrow leaves?What is this young shrub with opposite ovate, crenate leaves and reddish stems?What is this plant with large broad serrated leaves?Identify this upright branching weed with long leaves and reddish stemsPlease help me identify this bulbous plant with long, broad leaves and white flowersWhat is this small annual with narrow gray/green leaves and rust colored daisy-type flowers?What is this chilli plant?Does anyone know what type of chilli plant this is?Help identify this plant