Foward ports with iptables NAT rules?Port Mirroring using iptables - copy all traffic among nginx on :80 and Apache on :8080iptables - Redirect web traffic to LAN ServerAlter DST port on bridged trafficFreeBSD load balancer implementationiptables rule to snat port and ip on AWS instanceiptables - 2 Internetprovider - routingImplicit Inverses for iptables NAT RulesLocal port forwarding using iptables is not workingDROP or REJECT packets from PREROUTING NAT table in iptablesPort forwarding over OpenVpn
School performs periodic password audits. Is my password compromised?
How do I increase the number of TTY consoles?
What would be the most expensive material to an intergalactic society?
What is Tony Stark injecting into himself in Iron Man 3?
Should we avoid writing fiction about historical events without extensive research?
"If + would" conditional in present perfect tense
Translation of 答えを知っている人はいませんでした
Can one live in the U.S. and not use a credit card?
Would those living in a "perfect society" not understand satire
How to copy the rest of lines of a file to another file
Use Mercury as quenching liquid for swords?
How to educate team mate to take screenshots for bugs with out unwanted stuff
Why do we say 'Pairwise Disjoint', rather than 'Disjoint'?
Writing text next to a table
Are these two graphs isomorphic? Why/Why not?
How do we create new idioms and use them in a novel?
Is there a way to make cleveref distinguish two environments with the same counter?
Under what conditions can the right to remain silent be revoked in the USA?
Create chunks from an array
Called into a meeting and told we are being made redundant (laid off) and "not to share outside". Can I tell my partner?
Locked Away- What am I?
Why does Central Limit Theorem break down in my simulation?
Help! My Character is too much for her story!
PTIJ: Who was the sixth set of priestly clothes for?
Foward ports with iptables NAT rules?
Port Mirroring using iptables - copy all traffic among nginx on :80 and Apache on :8080iptables - Redirect web traffic to LAN ServerAlter DST port on bridged trafficFreeBSD load balancer implementationiptables rule to snat port and ip on AWS instanceiptables - 2 Internetprovider - routingImplicit Inverses for iptables NAT RulesLocal port forwarding using iptables is not workingDROP or REJECT packets from PREROUTING NAT table in iptablesPort forwarding over OpenVpn
I'm trying to forward ports with iptables NAT rules, but it doesn't seem to work.
So I want traffic from NAT#1 in a specific port range go to a specific server in a server group and traffic from NAT#2 to another server group.
I have to use the "NAT server" 192.168.1.10 as SNAT otherwise the FW will drop the traffic.
I've tried the following on the "NAT server",
Example A - NAT#1 port 4000 to Server Group A
sudo iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d 192.168.1.20 --dport 4000 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.100
sudo iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.1.100 -j SNAT --to 192.168.1.10
Example B - NAT#2 port 5000 to Server Group B
sudo iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d 192.168.1.30 --dport 5000 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.201
sudo iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.1.201 -j SNAT --to 192.168.1.10
UPDATE
I have to use the "NAT server" 192.168.1.10 as SNAT otherwise the
FW will drop the traffic.
This works, kind of.
sudo firewall-cmd --permanent --zone=public --add-rich-rule='rule family=ipv4 destination address=192.168.1.20 forward-port port=4000-4010 protocol=tcp to-addr=192.168.1.100'
sudo firewall-cmd --permanent --zone=public --add-rich-rule='rule family=ipv4 destination address=192.168.1.30 forward-port port=4000-4010 protocol=tcp to-addr=192.168.1.200'
sudo firewall-cmd --reload
but not with one zone. As they write in RedHat firewall doc,
A rule is associated with a particular zone. A zone can have several rules. If some rules interact or contradict, the first rule that matches the packet applies.
So I have to use two zones. Is this possible with two aliases?!?
UPDATE
This worked...
firewall-cmd --permanent --direct --add-rule ipv4 nat PREROUTING 0 -p tcp -m tcp -d "nat_alias" --dport "ext_port" -j DNAT --to-destination "server_ip":"int_port"
firewall-cmd --permanent --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter FORWARD 0 -m state -p tcp -d "server_ip" --dport "int_port" --state NEW,ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
firewall-cmd --permanent --direct --add-rule ipv4 nat POSTROUTING 0 -t nat -p tcp -m tcp -s "server_ip" --sport "int_port" -j SNAT --to-source "nat_ip"
rhel iptables port-forwarding nat
add a comment |
I'm trying to forward ports with iptables NAT rules, but it doesn't seem to work.
So I want traffic from NAT#1 in a specific port range go to a specific server in a server group and traffic from NAT#2 to another server group.
I have to use the "NAT server" 192.168.1.10 as SNAT otherwise the FW will drop the traffic.
I've tried the following on the "NAT server",
Example A - NAT#1 port 4000 to Server Group A
sudo iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d 192.168.1.20 --dport 4000 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.100
sudo iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.1.100 -j SNAT --to 192.168.1.10
Example B - NAT#2 port 5000 to Server Group B
sudo iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d 192.168.1.30 --dport 5000 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.201
sudo iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.1.201 -j SNAT --to 192.168.1.10
UPDATE
I have to use the "NAT server" 192.168.1.10 as SNAT otherwise the
FW will drop the traffic.
This works, kind of.
sudo firewall-cmd --permanent --zone=public --add-rich-rule='rule family=ipv4 destination address=192.168.1.20 forward-port port=4000-4010 protocol=tcp to-addr=192.168.1.100'
sudo firewall-cmd --permanent --zone=public --add-rich-rule='rule family=ipv4 destination address=192.168.1.30 forward-port port=4000-4010 protocol=tcp to-addr=192.168.1.200'
sudo firewall-cmd --reload
but not with one zone. As they write in RedHat firewall doc,
A rule is associated with a particular zone. A zone can have several rules. If some rules interact or contradict, the first rule that matches the packet applies.
So I have to use two zones. Is this possible with two aliases?!?
UPDATE
This worked...
firewall-cmd --permanent --direct --add-rule ipv4 nat PREROUTING 0 -p tcp -m tcp -d "nat_alias" --dport "ext_port" -j DNAT --to-destination "server_ip":"int_port"
firewall-cmd --permanent --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter FORWARD 0 -m state -p tcp -d "server_ip" --dport "int_port" --state NEW,ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
firewall-cmd --permanent --direct --add-rule ipv4 nat POSTROUTING 0 -t nat -p tcp -m tcp -s "server_ip" --sport "int_port" -j SNAT --to-source "nat_ip"
rhel iptables port-forwarding nat
add a comment |
I'm trying to forward ports with iptables NAT rules, but it doesn't seem to work.
So I want traffic from NAT#1 in a specific port range go to a specific server in a server group and traffic from NAT#2 to another server group.
I have to use the "NAT server" 192.168.1.10 as SNAT otherwise the FW will drop the traffic.
I've tried the following on the "NAT server",
Example A - NAT#1 port 4000 to Server Group A
sudo iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d 192.168.1.20 --dport 4000 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.100
sudo iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.1.100 -j SNAT --to 192.168.1.10
Example B - NAT#2 port 5000 to Server Group B
sudo iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d 192.168.1.30 --dport 5000 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.201
sudo iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.1.201 -j SNAT --to 192.168.1.10
UPDATE
I have to use the "NAT server" 192.168.1.10 as SNAT otherwise the
FW will drop the traffic.
This works, kind of.
sudo firewall-cmd --permanent --zone=public --add-rich-rule='rule family=ipv4 destination address=192.168.1.20 forward-port port=4000-4010 protocol=tcp to-addr=192.168.1.100'
sudo firewall-cmd --permanent --zone=public --add-rich-rule='rule family=ipv4 destination address=192.168.1.30 forward-port port=4000-4010 protocol=tcp to-addr=192.168.1.200'
sudo firewall-cmd --reload
but not with one zone. As they write in RedHat firewall doc,
A rule is associated with a particular zone. A zone can have several rules. If some rules interact or contradict, the first rule that matches the packet applies.
So I have to use two zones. Is this possible with two aliases?!?
UPDATE
This worked...
firewall-cmd --permanent --direct --add-rule ipv4 nat PREROUTING 0 -p tcp -m tcp -d "nat_alias" --dport "ext_port" -j DNAT --to-destination "server_ip":"int_port"
firewall-cmd --permanent --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter FORWARD 0 -m state -p tcp -d "server_ip" --dport "int_port" --state NEW,ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
firewall-cmd --permanent --direct --add-rule ipv4 nat POSTROUTING 0 -t nat -p tcp -m tcp -s "server_ip" --sport "int_port" -j SNAT --to-source "nat_ip"
rhel iptables port-forwarding nat
I'm trying to forward ports with iptables NAT rules, but it doesn't seem to work.
So I want traffic from NAT#1 in a specific port range go to a specific server in a server group and traffic from NAT#2 to another server group.
I have to use the "NAT server" 192.168.1.10 as SNAT otherwise the FW will drop the traffic.
I've tried the following on the "NAT server",
Example A - NAT#1 port 4000 to Server Group A
sudo iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d 192.168.1.20 --dport 4000 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.100
sudo iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.1.100 -j SNAT --to 192.168.1.10
Example B - NAT#2 port 5000 to Server Group B
sudo iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d 192.168.1.30 --dport 5000 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.201
sudo iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.1.201 -j SNAT --to 192.168.1.10
UPDATE
I have to use the "NAT server" 192.168.1.10 as SNAT otherwise the
FW will drop the traffic.
This works, kind of.
sudo firewall-cmd --permanent --zone=public --add-rich-rule='rule family=ipv4 destination address=192.168.1.20 forward-port port=4000-4010 protocol=tcp to-addr=192.168.1.100'
sudo firewall-cmd --permanent --zone=public --add-rich-rule='rule family=ipv4 destination address=192.168.1.30 forward-port port=4000-4010 protocol=tcp to-addr=192.168.1.200'
sudo firewall-cmd --reload
but not with one zone. As they write in RedHat firewall doc,
A rule is associated with a particular zone. A zone can have several rules. If some rules interact or contradict, the first rule that matches the packet applies.
So I have to use two zones. Is this possible with two aliases?!?
UPDATE
This worked...
firewall-cmd --permanent --direct --add-rule ipv4 nat PREROUTING 0 -p tcp -m tcp -d "nat_alias" --dport "ext_port" -j DNAT --to-destination "server_ip":"int_port"
firewall-cmd --permanent --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter FORWARD 0 -m state -p tcp -d "server_ip" --dport "int_port" --state NEW,ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
firewall-cmd --permanent --direct --add-rule ipv4 nat POSTROUTING 0 -t nat -p tcp -m tcp -s "server_ip" --sport "int_port" -j SNAT --to-source "nat_ip"
rhel iptables port-forwarding nat
rhel iptables port-forwarding nat
edited 14 mins ago
Rui F Ribeiro
41.3k1481140
41.3k1481140
asked Dec 13 '16 at 13:21
BjosveBjosve
162
162
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You should do NAT/SNAT first after that you use NAT/SNAT ip address to forward port.Maybe you need to separate iptable rules.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f330074%2ffoward-ports-with-iptables-nat-rules%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You should do NAT/SNAT first after that you use NAT/SNAT ip address to forward port.Maybe you need to separate iptable rules.
add a comment |
You should do NAT/SNAT first after that you use NAT/SNAT ip address to forward port.Maybe you need to separate iptable rules.
add a comment |
You should do NAT/SNAT first after that you use NAT/SNAT ip address to forward port.Maybe you need to separate iptable rules.
You should do NAT/SNAT first after that you use NAT/SNAT ip address to forward port.Maybe you need to separate iptable rules.
answered Dec 13 '16 at 15:13
supriadysupriady
146211
146211
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f330074%2ffoward-ports-with-iptables-nat-rules%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown