Is this toilet sign correct usage of the English language?What is correct in this case, “probable” or “probably”?Are 'effectually' and 'effectively' completely interchangable?He began to breathe deep / deeplyAdverbs + Present PerfectNo adverb of controlled?Past Participle as AdverbWhen should we use an adjective instead of an adverb after verbs(main verb)?adjective or adverb before ing-form?Single word request for a person who speaks by even considering a potential rebuttalWhat part of speech is 'better' in the following sentence?
Pronouncing Homer as in modern Greek
What was required to accept "troll"?
What do you call the infoboxes with text and sometimes images on the side of a page we find in textbooks?
Simulating a probability of 1 of 2^N with less than N random bits
A workplace installs custom certificates on personal devices, can this be used to decrypt HTTPS traffic?
Is exact Kanji stroke length important?
Books on the History of math research at European universities
Invariance of results when scaling explanatory variables in logistic regression, is there a proof?
How will losing mobility of one hand affect my career as a programmer?
What will be the benefits of Brexit?
Who must act to prevent Brexit on March 29th?
What does the "3am" section means in manpages?
Female=gender counterpart?
How do I repair my stair bannister?
Can somebody explain Brexit in a few child-proof sentences?
Is there a problem with hiding "forgot password" until it's needed?
Did US corporations pay demonstrators in the German demonstrations against article 13?
Is there any significance to the Valyrian Stone vault door of Qarth?
Giant Toughroad SLR 2 for 200 miles in two days, will it make it?
I'm in charge of equipment buying but no one's ever happy with what I choose. How to fix this?
Would it be legal for a US State to ban exports of a natural resource?
Simple image editor tool to draw a simple box/rectangle in an existing image
Calculating the number of days between 2 dates in Excel
word describing multiple paths to the same abstract outcome
Is this toilet sign correct usage of the English language?
What is correct in this case, “probable” or “probably”?Are 'effectually' and 'effectively' completely interchangable?He began to breathe deep / deeplyAdverbs + Present PerfectNo adverb of controlled?Past Participle as AdverbWhen should we use an adjective instead of an adverb after verbs(main verb)?adjective or adverb before ing-form?Single word request for a person who speaks by even considering a potential rebuttalWhat part of speech is 'better' in the following sentence?
Our company has signs at the toilet that read
Please leave the toilet properly
Is that correct? My intuition would be that "properly" as an adverb would reference the action "leave" and not the thing "toilet." So that wouldn't make sense, right?
If it is indeed wrong - what would be a better way of phrasing it?
adverbs
asked Mar 21 at 15:32
Mathias BaderMathias Bader
28348
|
show 8 more comments
Our company has signs at the toilet that read
Please leave the toilet properly
Is that correct? My intuition would be that "properly" as an adverb would reference the action "leave" and not the thing "toilet." So that wouldn't make sense, right?
If it is indeed wrong - what would be a better way of phrasing it?
adverbs
asked Mar 21 at 15:32
Mathias BaderMathias Bader
28348
5
I think the confusion here might be the use of the word "toilet". In US usage, the word refers strictly to the commode, i.e. the thing you sit on. In UK and other places, it refers to the entire room where the commode is (and often a sink). This is further distinct from "bathroom", which would include a bath or shower as well. (These are often the same room in the US, but usually separate in Europe.)
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 21 at 20:56
8
Seems like a better question for ell.stackexchange.com
– BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
Mar 21 at 22:20
9
@TonyK Code blocks are not just another text format, they are semantic markup that indicates to the browser that the content within is code. Assistive technologies such as screen readers will treat code blocks differently to text, and potentially make your question unintelligible to people accessing the page using such technologies
– Ty Hayes
Mar 22 at 14:11
3
@TonyK I'm sorry you feel that way. It is consensus on StackExchange to only use code blocks for code. Thanks!
– Azor Ahai
Mar 22 at 16:47
4
@TonyK That's a rather narrow view. For starters, you're completely forgetting about an entire segment of society that does not consume written content the same way that you do. Besides that, this is part of the reason we use correct markdown for the correct job - let the formatter do the formatting, on whatever medium is in play at any given time. Don't use code blocks for things that aren't verbatim code-like technical things. Separate form from function. Also your rebuke was more officious than the edit.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Mar 22 at 16:49
|
show 8 more comments
Our company has signs at the toilet that read
Please leave the toilet properly
Is that correct? My intuition would be that "properly" as an adverb would reference the action "leave" and not the thing "toilet." So that wouldn't make sense, right?
If it is indeed wrong - what would be a better way of phrasing it?
adverbs
asked Mar 21 at 15:32
Mathias BaderMathias Bader
28348
Our company has signs at the toilet that read
Please leave the toilet properly
Is that correct? My intuition would be that "properly" as an adverb would reference the action "leave" and not the thing "toilet." So that wouldn't make sense, right?
If it is indeed wrong - what would be a better way of phrasing it?
adverbs
adverbs
asked Mar 21 at 15:32
Mathias BaderMathias Bader
28348
asked Mar 21 at 15:32
Mathias BaderMathias Bader
28348
edited 12 hours ago
Mathias Bader
asked Mar 21 at 15:32
Mathias BaderMathias Bader
28348
asked Mar 21 at 15:32
Mathias BaderMathias Bader
28348
asked Mar 21 at 15:32
Mathias BaderMathias Bader
28348
28348
5
I think the confusion here might be the use of the word "toilet". In US usage, the word refers strictly to the commode, i.e. the thing you sit on. In UK and other places, it refers to the entire room where the commode is (and often a sink). This is further distinct from "bathroom", which would include a bath or shower as well. (These are often the same room in the US, but usually separate in Europe.)
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 21 at 20:56
8
Seems like a better question for ell.stackexchange.com
– BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
Mar 21 at 22:20
9
@TonyK Code blocks are not just another text format, they are semantic markup that indicates to the browser that the content within is code. Assistive technologies such as screen readers will treat code blocks differently to text, and potentially make your question unintelligible to people accessing the page using such technologies
– Ty Hayes
Mar 22 at 14:11
3
@TonyK I'm sorry you feel that way. It is consensus on StackExchange to only use code blocks for code. Thanks!
– Azor Ahai
Mar 22 at 16:47
4
@TonyK That's a rather narrow view. For starters, you're completely forgetting about an entire segment of society that does not consume written content the same way that you do. Besides that, this is part of the reason we use correct markdown for the correct job - let the formatter do the formatting, on whatever medium is in play at any given time. Don't use code blocks for things that aren't verbatim code-like technical things. Separate form from function. Also your rebuke was more officious than the edit.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Mar 22 at 16:49
|
show 8 more comments
5
I think the confusion here might be the use of the word "toilet". In US usage, the word refers strictly to the commode, i.e. the thing you sit on. In UK and other places, it refers to the entire room where the commode is (and often a sink). This is further distinct from "bathroom", which would include a bath or shower as well. (These are often the same room in the US, but usually separate in Europe.)
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 21 at 20:56
8
Seems like a better question for ell.stackexchange.com
– BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
Mar 21 at 22:20
9
@TonyK Code blocks are not just another text format, they are semantic markup that indicates to the browser that the content within is code. Assistive technologies such as screen readers will treat code blocks differently to text, and potentially make your question unintelligible to people accessing the page using such technologies
– Ty Hayes
Mar 22 at 14:11
3
@TonyK I'm sorry you feel that way. It is consensus on StackExchange to only use code blocks for code. Thanks!
– Azor Ahai
Mar 22 at 16:47
4
@TonyK That's a rather narrow view. For starters, you're completely forgetting about an entire segment of society that does not consume written content the same way that you do. Besides that, this is part of the reason we use correct markdown for the correct job - let the formatter do the formatting, on whatever medium is in play at any given time. Don't use code blocks for things that aren't verbatim code-like technical things. Separate form from function. Also your rebuke was more officious than the edit.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Mar 22 at 16:49
5
5
I think the confusion here might be the use of the word "toilet". In US usage, the word refers strictly to the commode, i.e. the thing you sit on. In UK and other places, it refers to the entire room where the commode is (and often a sink). This is further distinct from "bathroom", which would include a bath or shower as well. (These are often the same room in the US, but usually separate in Europe.)
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 21 at 20:56
I think the confusion here might be the use of the word "toilet". In US usage, the word refers strictly to the commode, i.e. the thing you sit on. In UK and other places, it refers to the entire room where the commode is (and often a sink). This is further distinct from "bathroom", which would include a bath or shower as well. (These are often the same room in the US, but usually separate in Europe.)
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 21 at 20:56
8
8
Seems like a better question for ell.stackexchange.com
– BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
Mar 21 at 22:20
Seems like a better question for ell.stackexchange.com
– BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
Mar 21 at 22:20
9
9
@TonyK Code blocks are not just another text format, they are semantic markup that indicates to the browser that the content within is code. Assistive technologies such as screen readers will treat code blocks differently to text, and potentially make your question unintelligible to people accessing the page using such technologies
– Ty Hayes
Mar 22 at 14:11
@TonyK Code blocks are not just another text format, they are semantic markup that indicates to the browser that the content within is code. Assistive technologies such as screen readers will treat code blocks differently to text, and potentially make your question unintelligible to people accessing the page using such technologies
– Ty Hayes
Mar 22 at 14:11
3
3
@TonyK I'm sorry you feel that way. It is consensus on StackExchange to only use code blocks for code. Thanks!
– Azor Ahai
Mar 22 at 16:47
@TonyK I'm sorry you feel that way. It is consensus on StackExchange to only use code blocks for code. Thanks!
– Azor Ahai
Mar 22 at 16:47
4
4
@TonyK That's a rather narrow view. For starters, you're completely forgetting about an entire segment of society that does not consume written content the same way that you do. Besides that, this is part of the reason we use correct markdown for the correct job - let the formatter do the formatting, on whatever medium is in play at any given time. Don't use code blocks for things that aren't verbatim code-like technical things. Separate form from function. Also your rebuke was more officious than the edit.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Mar 22 at 16:49
@TonyK That's a rather narrow view. For starters, you're completely forgetting about an entire segment of society that does not consume written content the same way that you do. Besides that, this is part of the reason we use correct markdown for the correct job - let the formatter do the formatting, on whatever medium is in play at any given time. Don't use code blocks for things that aren't verbatim code-like technical things. Separate form from function. Also your rebuke was more officious than the edit.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Mar 22 at 16:49
|
show 8 more comments
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
I read this sentence as: Please exit from the toilet in the correct manner. Don't do any silly walks. Don't try to walk through the door before you've opened it. Don't scream, "She's gonna blow!" as you charge out of the stall.
It's a grammatical English sentence and even has a real meaning, but probably not the meaning the sign writers intended.
Presumably they meant something like please leave the toilet in the proper condition. You could arguably write this as "please leave the toilet proper," in the same way that you'd write "please leave the toilet clean." We do not say, "Please leave the toilet cleanly," because, as you say, the adverb cleanly modifies the verb leave, not the noun toilet.
Still, I don't know what the "proper condition" of a toilet is, so leave the toilet proper wouldn't make sense to me. Perhaps they mean leave the toilet clean and with the seat and lid down and make sure to flush. If so, that's not coming through with that terse message.
And even if the "proper condition" were unambiguous, and if they did mean leave the toilet proper, as has been pointed out in the comments, it would be more natural to use "leave the toilet proper1" to mean step away from the toilet (the apparatus) or else, exit the formal toilet area (and perhaps enter the makeshift toilet)
1:
proper
strictly limited to a specified thing, place, or idea the city proper
// the city proper
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/proper
answered Mar 21 at 15:43
JuhaszJuhasz
2,6151511
6
When I was a boy, British public toilets often had a notice by the door saying "Gentlemen: please adjust your dress". It did not suppose that men wore frocks; it was a reminder to do up one's fly.
– Michael Harvey
Mar 21 at 16:49
55
"Please leave the toilet proper" could be interpreted as "Please leave the place formally designated as the toilet."
– TKK
Mar 21 at 17:39
12
@TKK The opposite, surely. Imagine a huge building whose only function is to be a toilet block but which contains grand corridors, waiting areas and so on. The whole thing would formally designated as "the toilet[s]", but "the toilet proper" would refer to the actual lavatory.
– David Richerby
Mar 21 at 17:55
13
I'm having a bad day. I really needed that first paragraph. Thanks and +1.
– cobaltduck
Mar 21 at 18:15
6
Thanks for the 'silly walks'..
– TaW
Mar 21 at 19:11
|
show 13 more comments
Is your company in a place with a lot of French speakers? Looks like a mistranslation of propre (=clean).
answered Mar 22 at 7:00
Bloke Down The PubBloke Down The Pub
51932
"Veuillez laisser les toilettes proprement"?? Same issue as the English. French wouldn't use an adverb here....
– Lambie
12 hours ago
add a comment |
Yes, it is wrong. As you can tell from the other answers, it is a bit puzzling.
The author may have been trying for one of these effects:
People should put their clothing back together properly before leaving the toilet area. So a correct way of phrasing this would be; "Please adjust your clothing before leaving".
People should leave the room, and especially the toilet itself clean and tidy. This could be expressed as: "Please leave the toilet clean and tidy" or "Please leave the toilet as you would wish to find it."
This is one place where liberal use of smileys is appropriate.
answered Mar 22 at 8:10
RedSonjaRedSonja
737513
2
I'd agree that the notion was probably #2. Not sure where sign was. It might mean "Please leave the bathroom clean and tidy."
– MaxW
Mar 22 at 23:57
add a comment |
The sentence "Please leave the toilet properly" does not mean anything.
In common English usage one would have to wonder what they are referring to regarding the word "properly". If the intention is to leave the toilet clean, or having flushed the toilet, then this should be explicity nominated. Or more generally one might put up a sign,
"Please leave the toilet clean and ready for the next person".
I hope this helps.
answered 2 days ago
SciencezSciencez
11
New contributor
Sciencez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
2
This answer is wrong. "Please leave the toilet properly" does have meaning and is a perfectly valid sentence, as other answers have demonstrated.
– Andrew Leach♦
2 days ago
Yes, it has meaning but the meaning is not something one would see in a toilet, for heaven's sake. No one directs people on proper exiting procedures for a toilet.
– Lambie
12 hours ago
add a comment |
protected by Andrew Leach♦ 2 days ago
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I read this sentence as: Please exit from the toilet in the correct manner. Don't do any silly walks. Don't try to walk through the door before you've opened it. Don't scream, "She's gonna blow!" as you charge out of the stall.
It's a grammatical English sentence and even has a real meaning, but probably not the meaning the sign writers intended.
Presumably they meant something like please leave the toilet in the proper condition. You could arguably write this as "please leave the toilet proper," in the same way that you'd write "please leave the toilet clean." We do not say, "Please leave the toilet cleanly," because, as you say, the adverb cleanly modifies the verb leave, not the noun toilet.
Still, I don't know what the "proper condition" of a toilet is, so leave the toilet proper wouldn't make sense to me. Perhaps they mean leave the toilet clean and with the seat and lid down and make sure to flush. If so, that's not coming through with that terse message.
And even if the "proper condition" were unambiguous, and if they did mean leave the toilet proper, as has been pointed out in the comments, it would be more natural to use "leave the toilet proper1" to mean step away from the toilet (the apparatus) or else, exit the formal toilet area (and perhaps enter the makeshift toilet)
1:
proper
strictly limited to a specified thing, place, or idea the city proper
// the city proper
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/proper
answered Mar 21 at 15:43
JuhaszJuhasz
2,6151511
6
When I was a boy, British public toilets often had a notice by the door saying "Gentlemen: please adjust your dress". It did not suppose that men wore frocks; it was a reminder to do up one's fly.
– Michael Harvey
Mar 21 at 16:49
55
"Please leave the toilet proper" could be interpreted as "Please leave the place formally designated as the toilet."
– TKK
Mar 21 at 17:39
12
@TKK The opposite, surely. Imagine a huge building whose only function is to be a toilet block but which contains grand corridors, waiting areas and so on. The whole thing would formally designated as "the toilet[s]", but "the toilet proper" would refer to the actual lavatory.
– David Richerby
Mar 21 at 17:55
13
I'm having a bad day. I really needed that first paragraph. Thanks and +1.
– cobaltduck
Mar 21 at 18:15
6
Thanks for the 'silly walks'..
– TaW
Mar 21 at 19:11
|
show 13 more comments
I read this sentence as: Please exit from the toilet in the correct manner. Don't do any silly walks. Don't try to walk through the door before you've opened it. Don't scream, "She's gonna blow!" as you charge out of the stall.
It's a grammatical English sentence and even has a real meaning, but probably not the meaning the sign writers intended.
Presumably they meant something like please leave the toilet in the proper condition. You could arguably write this as "please leave the toilet proper," in the same way that you'd write "please leave the toilet clean." We do not say, "Please leave the toilet cleanly," because, as you say, the adverb cleanly modifies the verb leave, not the noun toilet.
Still, I don't know what the "proper condition" of a toilet is, so leave the toilet proper wouldn't make sense to me. Perhaps they mean leave the toilet clean and with the seat and lid down and make sure to flush. If so, that's not coming through with that terse message.
And even if the "proper condition" were unambiguous, and if they did mean leave the toilet proper, as has been pointed out in the comments, it would be more natural to use "leave the toilet proper1" to mean step away from the toilet (the apparatus) or else, exit the formal toilet area (and perhaps enter the makeshift toilet)
1:
proper
strictly limited to a specified thing, place, or idea the city proper
// the city proper
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/proper
answered Mar 21 at 15:43
JuhaszJuhasz
2,6151511
6
When I was a boy, British public toilets often had a notice by the door saying "Gentlemen: please adjust your dress". It did not suppose that men wore frocks; it was a reminder to do up one's fly.
– Michael Harvey
Mar 21 at 16:49
55
"Please leave the toilet proper" could be interpreted as "Please leave the place formally designated as the toilet."
– TKK
Mar 21 at 17:39
12
@TKK The opposite, surely. Imagine a huge building whose only function is to be a toilet block but which contains grand corridors, waiting areas and so on. The whole thing would formally designated as "the toilet[s]", but "the toilet proper" would refer to the actual lavatory.
– David Richerby
Mar 21 at 17:55
13
I'm having a bad day. I really needed that first paragraph. Thanks and +1.
– cobaltduck
Mar 21 at 18:15
6
Thanks for the 'silly walks'..
– TaW
Mar 21 at 19:11
|
show 13 more comments
I read this sentence as: Please exit from the toilet in the correct manner. Don't do any silly walks. Don't try to walk through the door before you've opened it. Don't scream, "She's gonna blow!" as you charge out of the stall.
It's a grammatical English sentence and even has a real meaning, but probably not the meaning the sign writers intended.
Presumably they meant something like please leave the toilet in the proper condition. You could arguably write this as "please leave the toilet proper," in the same way that you'd write "please leave the toilet clean." We do not say, "Please leave the toilet cleanly," because, as you say, the adverb cleanly modifies the verb leave, not the noun toilet.
Still, I don't know what the "proper condition" of a toilet is, so leave the toilet proper wouldn't make sense to me. Perhaps they mean leave the toilet clean and with the seat and lid down and make sure to flush. If so, that's not coming through with that terse message.
And even if the "proper condition" were unambiguous, and if they did mean leave the toilet proper, as has been pointed out in the comments, it would be more natural to use "leave the toilet proper1" to mean step away from the toilet (the apparatus) or else, exit the formal toilet area (and perhaps enter the makeshift toilet)
1:
proper
strictly limited to a specified thing, place, or idea the city proper
// the city proper
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/proper
answered Mar 21 at 15:43
JuhaszJuhasz
2,6151511
I read this sentence as: Please exit from the toilet in the correct manner. Don't do any silly walks. Don't try to walk through the door before you've opened it. Don't scream, "She's gonna blow!" as you charge out of the stall.
It's a grammatical English sentence and even has a real meaning, but probably not the meaning the sign writers intended.
Presumably they meant something like please leave the toilet in the proper condition. You could arguably write this as "please leave the toilet proper," in the same way that you'd write "please leave the toilet clean." We do not say, "Please leave the toilet cleanly," because, as you say, the adverb cleanly modifies the verb leave, not the noun toilet.
Still, I don't know what the "proper condition" of a toilet is, so leave the toilet proper wouldn't make sense to me. Perhaps they mean leave the toilet clean and with the seat and lid down and make sure to flush. If so, that's not coming through with that terse message.
And even if the "proper condition" were unambiguous, and if they did mean leave the toilet proper, as has been pointed out in the comments, it would be more natural to use "leave the toilet proper1" to mean step away from the toilet (the apparatus) or else, exit the formal toilet area (and perhaps enter the makeshift toilet)
1:
proper
strictly limited to a specified thing, place, or idea the city proper
// the city proper
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/proper
answered Mar 21 at 15:43
JuhaszJuhasz
2,6151511
edited Mar 21 at 18:33
answered Mar 21 at 15:43
JuhaszJuhasz
2,6151511
answered Mar 21 at 15:43
JuhaszJuhasz
2,6151511
answered Mar 21 at 15:43
JuhaszJuhasz
2,6151511
2,6151511
6
When I was a boy, British public toilets often had a notice by the door saying "Gentlemen: please adjust your dress". It did not suppose that men wore frocks; it was a reminder to do up one's fly.
– Michael Harvey
Mar 21 at 16:49
55
"Please leave the toilet proper" could be interpreted as "Please leave the place formally designated as the toilet."
– TKK
Mar 21 at 17:39
12
@TKK The opposite, surely. Imagine a huge building whose only function is to be a toilet block but which contains grand corridors, waiting areas and so on. The whole thing would formally designated as "the toilet[s]", but "the toilet proper" would refer to the actual lavatory.
– David Richerby
Mar 21 at 17:55
13
I'm having a bad day. I really needed that first paragraph. Thanks and +1.
– cobaltduck
Mar 21 at 18:15
6
Thanks for the 'silly walks'..
– TaW
Mar 21 at 19:11
|
show 13 more comments
6
When I was a boy, British public toilets often had a notice by the door saying "Gentlemen: please adjust your dress". It did not suppose that men wore frocks; it was a reminder to do up one's fly.
– Michael Harvey
Mar 21 at 16:49
55
"Please leave the toilet proper" could be interpreted as "Please leave the place formally designated as the toilet."
– TKK
Mar 21 at 17:39
12
@TKK The opposite, surely. Imagine a huge building whose only function is to be a toilet block but which contains grand corridors, waiting areas and so on. The whole thing would formally designated as "the toilet[s]", but "the toilet proper" would refer to the actual lavatory.
– David Richerby
Mar 21 at 17:55
13
I'm having a bad day. I really needed that first paragraph. Thanks and +1.
– cobaltduck
Mar 21 at 18:15
6
Thanks for the 'silly walks'..
– TaW
Mar 21 at 19:11
6
6
When I was a boy, British public toilets often had a notice by the door saying "Gentlemen: please adjust your dress". It did not suppose that men wore frocks; it was a reminder to do up one's fly.
– Michael Harvey
Mar 21 at 16:49
When I was a boy, British public toilets often had a notice by the door saying "Gentlemen: please adjust your dress". It did not suppose that men wore frocks; it was a reminder to do up one's fly.
– Michael Harvey
Mar 21 at 16:49
55
55
"Please leave the toilet proper" could be interpreted as "Please leave the place formally designated as the toilet."
– TKK
Mar 21 at 17:39
"Please leave the toilet proper" could be interpreted as "Please leave the place formally designated as the toilet."
– TKK
Mar 21 at 17:39
12
12
@TKK The opposite, surely. Imagine a huge building whose only function is to be a toilet block but which contains grand corridors, waiting areas and so on. The whole thing would formally designated as "the toilet[s]", but "the toilet proper" would refer to the actual lavatory.
– David Richerby
Mar 21 at 17:55
@TKK The opposite, surely. Imagine a huge building whose only function is to be a toilet block but which contains grand corridors, waiting areas and so on. The whole thing would formally designated as "the toilet[s]", but "the toilet proper" would refer to the actual lavatory.
– David Richerby
Mar 21 at 17:55
13
13
I'm having a bad day. I really needed that first paragraph. Thanks and +1.
– cobaltduck
Mar 21 at 18:15
I'm having a bad day. I really needed that first paragraph. Thanks and +1.
– cobaltduck
Mar 21 at 18:15
6
6
Thanks for the 'silly walks'..
– TaW
Mar 21 at 19:11
Thanks for the 'silly walks'..
– TaW
Mar 21 at 19:11
|
show 13 more comments
Is your company in a place with a lot of French speakers? Looks like a mistranslation of propre (=clean).
answered Mar 22 at 7:00
Bloke Down The PubBloke Down The Pub
51932
"Veuillez laisser les toilettes proprement"?? Same issue as the English. French wouldn't use an adverb here....
– Lambie
12 hours ago
add a comment |
Is your company in a place with a lot of French speakers? Looks like a mistranslation of propre (=clean).
answered Mar 22 at 7:00
Bloke Down The PubBloke Down The Pub
51932
"Veuillez laisser les toilettes proprement"?? Same issue as the English. French wouldn't use an adverb here....
– Lambie
12 hours ago
add a comment |
Is your company in a place with a lot of French speakers? Looks like a mistranslation of propre (=clean).
answered Mar 22 at 7:00
Bloke Down The PubBloke Down The Pub
51932
Is your company in a place with a lot of French speakers? Looks like a mistranslation of propre (=clean).
answered Mar 22 at 7:00
Bloke Down The PubBloke Down The Pub
51932
answered Mar 22 at 7:00
Bloke Down The PubBloke Down The Pub
51932
answered Mar 22 at 7:00
Bloke Down The PubBloke Down The Pub
51932
answered Mar 22 at 7:00
Bloke Down The PubBloke Down The Pub
51932
51932
"Veuillez laisser les toilettes proprement"?? Same issue as the English. French wouldn't use an adverb here....
– Lambie
12 hours ago
add a comment |
"Veuillez laisser les toilettes proprement"?? Same issue as the English. French wouldn't use an adverb here....
– Lambie
12 hours ago
"Veuillez laisser les toilettes proprement"?? Same issue as the English. French wouldn't use an adverb here....
– Lambie
12 hours ago
"Veuillez laisser les toilettes proprement"?? Same issue as the English. French wouldn't use an adverb here....
– Lambie
12 hours ago
add a comment |
Yes, it is wrong. As you can tell from the other answers, it is a bit puzzling.
The author may have been trying for one of these effects:
People should put their clothing back together properly before leaving the toilet area. So a correct way of phrasing this would be; "Please adjust your clothing before leaving".
People should leave the room, and especially the toilet itself clean and tidy. This could be expressed as: "Please leave the toilet clean and tidy" or "Please leave the toilet as you would wish to find it."
This is one place where liberal use of smileys is appropriate.
answered Mar 22 at 8:10
RedSonjaRedSonja
737513
2
I'd agree that the notion was probably #2. Not sure where sign was. It might mean "Please leave the bathroom clean and tidy."
– MaxW
Mar 22 at 23:57
add a comment |
Yes, it is wrong. As you can tell from the other answers, it is a bit puzzling.
The author may have been trying for one of these effects:
People should put their clothing back together properly before leaving the toilet area. So a correct way of phrasing this would be; "Please adjust your clothing before leaving".
People should leave the room, and especially the toilet itself clean and tidy. This could be expressed as: "Please leave the toilet clean and tidy" or "Please leave the toilet as you would wish to find it."
This is one place where liberal use of smileys is appropriate.
answered Mar 22 at 8:10
RedSonjaRedSonja
737513
2
I'd agree that the notion was probably #2. Not sure where sign was. It might mean "Please leave the bathroom clean and tidy."
– MaxW
Mar 22 at 23:57
add a comment |
Yes, it is wrong. As you can tell from the other answers, it is a bit puzzling.
The author may have been trying for one of these effects:
People should put their clothing back together properly before leaving the toilet area. So a correct way of phrasing this would be; "Please adjust your clothing before leaving".
People should leave the room, and especially the toilet itself clean and tidy. This could be expressed as: "Please leave the toilet clean and tidy" or "Please leave the toilet as you would wish to find it."
This is one place where liberal use of smileys is appropriate.
answered Mar 22 at 8:10
RedSonjaRedSonja
737513
Yes, it is wrong. As you can tell from the other answers, it is a bit puzzling.
The author may have been trying for one of these effects:
People should put their clothing back together properly before leaving the toilet area. So a correct way of phrasing this would be; "Please adjust your clothing before leaving".
People should leave the room, and especially the toilet itself clean and tidy. This could be expressed as: "Please leave the toilet clean and tidy" or "Please leave the toilet as you would wish to find it."
This is one place where liberal use of smileys is appropriate.
answered Mar 22 at 8:10
RedSonjaRedSonja
737513
answered Mar 22 at 8:10
RedSonjaRedSonja
737513
answered Mar 22 at 8:10
RedSonjaRedSonja
737513
answered Mar 22 at 8:10
RedSonjaRedSonja
737513
737513
2
I'd agree that the notion was probably #2. Not sure where sign was. It might mean "Please leave the bathroom clean and tidy."
– MaxW
Mar 22 at 23:57
add a comment |
2
I'd agree that the notion was probably #2. Not sure where sign was. It might mean "Please leave the bathroom clean and tidy."
– MaxW
Mar 22 at 23:57
2
2
I'd agree that the notion was probably #2. Not sure where sign was. It might mean "Please leave the bathroom clean and tidy."
– MaxW
Mar 22 at 23:57
I'd agree that the notion was probably #2. Not sure where sign was. It might mean "Please leave the bathroom clean and tidy."
– MaxW
Mar 22 at 23:57
add a comment |
The sentence "Please leave the toilet properly" does not mean anything.
In common English usage one would have to wonder what they are referring to regarding the word "properly". If the intention is to leave the toilet clean, or having flushed the toilet, then this should be explicity nominated. Or more generally one might put up a sign,
"Please leave the toilet clean and ready for the next person".
I hope this helps.
answered 2 days ago
SciencezSciencez
11
New contributor
Sciencez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
2
This answer is wrong. "Please leave the toilet properly" does have meaning and is a perfectly valid sentence, as other answers have demonstrated.
– Andrew Leach♦
2 days ago
Yes, it has meaning but the meaning is not something one would see in a toilet, for heaven's sake. No one directs people on proper exiting procedures for a toilet.
– Lambie
12 hours ago
add a comment |
The sentence "Please leave the toilet properly" does not mean anything.
In common English usage one would have to wonder what they are referring to regarding the word "properly". If the intention is to leave the toilet clean, or having flushed the toilet, then this should be explicity nominated. Or more generally one might put up a sign,
"Please leave the toilet clean and ready for the next person".
I hope this helps.
answered 2 days ago
SciencezSciencez
11
New contributor
Sciencez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
2
This answer is wrong. "Please leave the toilet properly" does have meaning and is a perfectly valid sentence, as other answers have demonstrated.
– Andrew Leach♦
2 days ago
Yes, it has meaning but the meaning is not something one would see in a toilet, for heaven's sake. No one directs people on proper exiting procedures for a toilet.
– Lambie
12 hours ago
add a comment |
The sentence "Please leave the toilet properly" does not mean anything.
In common English usage one would have to wonder what they are referring to regarding the word "properly". If the intention is to leave the toilet clean, or having flushed the toilet, then this should be explicity nominated. Or more generally one might put up a sign,
"Please leave the toilet clean and ready for the next person".
I hope this helps.
answered 2 days ago
SciencezSciencez
11
New contributor
Sciencez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
The sentence "Please leave the toilet properly" does not mean anything.
In common English usage one would have to wonder what they are referring to regarding the word "properly". If the intention is to leave the toilet clean, or having flushed the toilet, then this should be explicity nominated. Or more generally one might put up a sign,
"Please leave the toilet clean and ready for the next person".
I hope this helps.
answered 2 days ago
SciencezSciencez
11
New contributor
Sciencez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 2 days ago
SciencezSciencez
11
New contributor
Sciencez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 2 days ago
SciencezSciencez
11
answered 2 days ago
SciencezSciencez
11
11
New contributor
Sciencez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Sciencez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Sciencez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
2
This answer is wrong. "Please leave the toilet properly" does have meaning and is a perfectly valid sentence, as other answers have demonstrated.
– Andrew Leach♦
2 days ago
Yes, it has meaning but the meaning is not something one would see in a toilet, for heaven's sake. No one directs people on proper exiting procedures for a toilet.
– Lambie
12 hours ago
add a comment |
2
This answer is wrong. "Please leave the toilet properly" does have meaning and is a perfectly valid sentence, as other answers have demonstrated.
– Andrew Leach♦
2 days ago
Yes, it has meaning but the meaning is not something one would see in a toilet, for heaven's sake. No one directs people on proper exiting procedures for a toilet.
– Lambie
12 hours ago
2
2
This answer is wrong. "Please leave the toilet properly" does have meaning and is a perfectly valid sentence, as other answers have demonstrated.
– Andrew Leach♦
2 days ago
This answer is wrong. "Please leave the toilet properly" does have meaning and is a perfectly valid sentence, as other answers have demonstrated.
– Andrew Leach♦
2 days ago
Yes, it has meaning but the meaning is not something one would see in a toilet, for heaven's sake. No one directs people on proper exiting procedures for a toilet.
– Lambie
12 hours ago
Yes, it has meaning but the meaning is not something one would see in a toilet, for heaven's sake. No one directs people on proper exiting procedures for a toilet.
– Lambie
12 hours ago
add a comment |
protected by Andrew Leach♦ 2 days ago
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
-adverbs
5
I think the confusion here might be the use of the word "toilet". In US usage, the word refers strictly to the commode, i.e. the thing you sit on. In UK and other places, it refers to the entire room where the commode is (and often a sink). This is further distinct from "bathroom", which would include a bath or shower as well. (These are often the same room in the US, but usually separate in Europe.)
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 21 at 20:56
8
Seems like a better question for ell.stackexchange.com
– BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
Mar 21 at 22:20
9
@TonyK Code blocks are not just another text format, they are semantic markup that indicates to the browser that the content within is code. Assistive technologies such as screen readers will treat code blocks differently to text, and potentially make your question unintelligible to people accessing the page using such technologies
– Ty Hayes
Mar 22 at 14:11
3
@TonyK I'm sorry you feel that way. It is consensus on StackExchange to only use code blocks for code. Thanks!
– Azor Ahai
Mar 22 at 16:47
4
@TonyK That's a rather narrow view. For starters, you're completely forgetting about an entire segment of society that does not consume written content the same way that you do. Besides that, this is part of the reason we use correct markdown for the correct job - let the formatter do the formatting, on whatever medium is in play at any given time. Don't use code blocks for things that aren't verbatim code-like technical things. Separate form from function. Also your rebuke was more officious than the edit.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Mar 22 at 16:49