How come one can successfully ping 127.0.0.2 on Linux?2019 Community Moderator ElectionHow does the loopback interface workOpenBSD: Defining a new loopback interfaceWhat happens to local LAN traffic on linux to non-loopback addresses?why such behavior in Linux Network over Loopback InterfaceWhen does an IP address not need to be assigned to a network interface?How is it possible to send ping to all 127.0.0.0/8 successfully?Using ip addr instead of ifconfig reports “RTNETLINK answers: File exists” on DebianNetwork connectivity trouble to non-routing multi-homed hosts?FTP not happening on RHEL 6 Server configured using a Vm Player 11Can't figure out why Ethernet packets are ignoredWifi does not work in laptop 1 when laptop 2 is connectedDebian8 server : Can't resolve IP adresses or DNSConflict between wlan and ethernet boardNAT ETH1 PORT 5000 Traffic to PPP0Routing: multiple interfaces/subnets on same deviceHow to implement iptables on lxc-container?

Pronouncing Homer as in modern Greek

What do you call the infoboxes with text and sometimes images on the side of a page we find in textbooks?

What if somebody invests in my application?

Organic chemistry Iodoform Reaction

Can somebody explain Brexit in a few child-proof sentences?

Hostile work environment after whistle-blowing on coworker and our boss. What do I do?

Science Fiction story where a man invents a machine that can help him watch history unfold

Indicating multiple different modes of speech (fantasy language or telepathy)

What will be the benefits of Brexit?

What is the opposite of 'gravitas'?

Meta programming: Declare a new struct on the fly

Partial sums of primes

How can a jailer prevent the Forge Cleric's Artisan's Blessing from being used?

What to do when my ideas aren't chosen, when I strongly disagree with the chosen solution?

Is there any significance to the Valyrian Stone vault door of Qarth?

Simulating a probability of 1 of 2^N with less than N random bits

Can the electrostatic force be infinite in magnitude?

Identify a stage play about a VR experience in which participants are encouraged to simulate performing horrific activities

Lifted its hind leg on or lifted its hind leg towards?

Are Warlocks Arcane or Divine?

Giant Toughroad SLR 2 for 200 miles in two days, will it make it?

What is the term when two people sing in harmony, but they aren't singing the same notes?

Could solar power be utilized and substitute coal in the 19th century?

Why are all the doors on Ferenginar (the Ferengi home world) far shorter than the average Ferengi?



How come one can successfully ping 127.0.0.2 on Linux?



2019 Community Moderator ElectionHow does the loopback interface workOpenBSD: Defining a new loopback interfaceWhat happens to local LAN traffic on linux to non-loopback addresses?why such behavior in Linux Network over Loopback InterfaceWhen does an IP address not need to be assigned to a network interface?How is it possible to send ping to all 127.0.0.0/8 successfully?Using ip addr instead of ifconfig reports “RTNETLINK answers: File exists” on DebianNetwork connectivity trouble to non-routing multi-homed hosts?FTP not happening on RHEL 6 Server configured using a Vm Player 11Can't figure out why Ethernet packets are ignoredWifi does not work in laptop 1 when laptop 2 is connectedDebian8 server : Can't resolve IP adresses or DNSConflict between wlan and ethernet boardNAT ETH1 PORT 5000 Traffic to PPP0Routing: multiple interfaces/subnets on same deviceHow to implement iptables on lxc-container?










2















Let's ask this question properly.



On a FreeBSD system with a loopback network interface …



% ifconfig lo0 
lo0
link up loopback drv_running running multicast
nd6 performnud auto_linklocal no_radr
link rxcsum txcsum hwcsum rxcsum_ipv6 txcsum_ipv6
link address metric 0 mtu 16384
type 24 linkstate 0 physical 0 baudrate 0
inet4 address 127.0.0.1 prefixlen 8 bdaddr 127.0.0.1
inet6 address ::1 scope 0 prefixlen 128 bdaddr ::1 scope 0
inet6 address fe80::1 scope 3 prefixlen 64
inet6 address ::2 scope 0 prefixlen 128
inet4 address 127.53.0.1 prefixlen 8 bdaddr 127.53.0.1
inet4 address 127.53.1.1 prefixlen 8 bdaddr 127.53.1.1
%


… pinging the IP address 127.0.0.2, which is not assigned to that (or to any other) network interface results in failure:



% ping -c 1 127.0.0.2 
PING 127.0.0.2 (127.0.0.2): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: Network is unreachable

--- 127.0.0.2 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss
%


The same is true for OpenBSD:



% ping -c 1 127.0.0.2 
PING 127.0.0.2 (127.0.0.2): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: Network is unreachable
ping: wrote 127.0.0.2 64 chars, ret=-1
--- 127.0.0.2 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss
%


But on Linux where there is similarly no 127.0.0.2 configured …



% ifconfig lo
lo
link up loopback running
link address 00:00:00:00:00:00 bdaddr 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet4 address 127.0.0.1 prefixlen 8 bdaddr 127.0.0.1
inet4 address 127.53.0.1 prefixlen 8 bdaddr 127.255.255.255
inet6 address ::2 scope 0 prefixlen 128
inet6 address fe80:: scope 1 prefixlen 10
inet6 address ::1 scope 0 prefixlen 128
%


… the ping is surprisingly successful:



% ping -c 1 127.0.0.2
PING 127.0.0.2 (127.0.0.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 127.0.0.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.044 ms

--- 127.0.0.2 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.044/0.044/0.044/0.000 ms
%


How come?



Related questions



  • "When does an IP address not need to be assigned to a network interface?" — the very roundabout question, asking for an explanation of "virtual interfaces", that this question asks straightforwardly

  • "How is it possible to send ping to all 127.0.0.0/8 successfully?" — several questions in one, rather than one question per question, and not in fact answered by the purported duplicate

  • "why such behavior in Linux Network over Loopback Interface" — a question about why on Linux the lo interface seems to also control the pingability of IP addresses that are assigned to other network interfaces (behaviour that is similarly not what one gets on the BSDs)

  • "What happens to local LAN traffic on linux to non-loopback addresses?" — a question about non-loopback behaviour

Oh yes it does.



  • Jonathan de Boyne Pollard (2019). ifconfig. nosh Guide. Softwares.









share|improve this question

















  • 3





    I don't understand the presence of the "oh yes it does" header or the disconnected link to your ifconfig utility.

    – Jeff Schaller
    2 days ago












  • @JeffSchaller it's probably about his or her ifconfig being able to show multiple ipv4 addresses assigned to the same interface, just like ip addr. The question would've been much better if only standard tools were used throughout.

    – mosvy
    2 days ago












  • Humm, is this self promotion of his (JdeBP) man page?

    – fpmurphy
    2 days ago











  • See unix.stackexchange.com/questions/363507/…

    – Johan Myréen
    2 days ago











  • Without the preëmption, experience shows that the first several comment-answers would be sage explanations of how per received wisdom ifconfig doesn't display some addresses, even perhaps one from someone feeling extra wise explaining how even the OpenBSD ifconfig doesn't or 127.0.0.2 might be on an extra interface, and suggesting that as a cause. Now it's at least instead a comment not understanding how such a wild goose chase has been nipped in the bud, which you will grant is at least variety. (-:

    – JdeBP
    2 days ago















2















Let's ask this question properly.



On a FreeBSD system with a loopback network interface …



% ifconfig lo0 
lo0
link up loopback drv_running running multicast
nd6 performnud auto_linklocal no_radr
link rxcsum txcsum hwcsum rxcsum_ipv6 txcsum_ipv6
link address metric 0 mtu 16384
type 24 linkstate 0 physical 0 baudrate 0
inet4 address 127.0.0.1 prefixlen 8 bdaddr 127.0.0.1
inet6 address ::1 scope 0 prefixlen 128 bdaddr ::1 scope 0
inet6 address fe80::1 scope 3 prefixlen 64
inet6 address ::2 scope 0 prefixlen 128
inet4 address 127.53.0.1 prefixlen 8 bdaddr 127.53.0.1
inet4 address 127.53.1.1 prefixlen 8 bdaddr 127.53.1.1
%


… pinging the IP address 127.0.0.2, which is not assigned to that (or to any other) network interface results in failure:



% ping -c 1 127.0.0.2 
PING 127.0.0.2 (127.0.0.2): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: Network is unreachable

--- 127.0.0.2 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss
%


The same is true for OpenBSD:



% ping -c 1 127.0.0.2 
PING 127.0.0.2 (127.0.0.2): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: Network is unreachable
ping: wrote 127.0.0.2 64 chars, ret=-1
--- 127.0.0.2 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss
%


But on Linux where there is similarly no 127.0.0.2 configured …



% ifconfig lo
lo
link up loopback running
link address 00:00:00:00:00:00 bdaddr 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet4 address 127.0.0.1 prefixlen 8 bdaddr 127.0.0.1
inet4 address 127.53.0.1 prefixlen 8 bdaddr 127.255.255.255
inet6 address ::2 scope 0 prefixlen 128
inet6 address fe80:: scope 1 prefixlen 10
inet6 address ::1 scope 0 prefixlen 128
%


… the ping is surprisingly successful:



% ping -c 1 127.0.0.2
PING 127.0.0.2 (127.0.0.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 127.0.0.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.044 ms

--- 127.0.0.2 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.044/0.044/0.044/0.000 ms
%


How come?



Related questions



  • "When does an IP address not need to be assigned to a network interface?" — the very roundabout question, asking for an explanation of "virtual interfaces", that this question asks straightforwardly

  • "How is it possible to send ping to all 127.0.0.0/8 successfully?" — several questions in one, rather than one question per question, and not in fact answered by the purported duplicate

  • "why such behavior in Linux Network over Loopback Interface" — a question about why on Linux the lo interface seems to also control the pingability of IP addresses that are assigned to other network interfaces (behaviour that is similarly not what one gets on the BSDs)

  • "What happens to local LAN traffic on linux to non-loopback addresses?" — a question about non-loopback behaviour

Oh yes it does.



  • Jonathan de Boyne Pollard (2019). ifconfig. nosh Guide. Softwares.









share|improve this question

















  • 3





    I don't understand the presence of the "oh yes it does" header or the disconnected link to your ifconfig utility.

    – Jeff Schaller
    2 days ago












  • @JeffSchaller it's probably about his or her ifconfig being able to show multiple ipv4 addresses assigned to the same interface, just like ip addr. The question would've been much better if only standard tools were used throughout.

    – mosvy
    2 days ago












  • Humm, is this self promotion of his (JdeBP) man page?

    – fpmurphy
    2 days ago











  • See unix.stackexchange.com/questions/363507/…

    – Johan Myréen
    2 days ago











  • Without the preëmption, experience shows that the first several comment-answers would be sage explanations of how per received wisdom ifconfig doesn't display some addresses, even perhaps one from someone feeling extra wise explaining how even the OpenBSD ifconfig doesn't or 127.0.0.2 might be on an extra interface, and suggesting that as a cause. Now it's at least instead a comment not understanding how such a wild goose chase has been nipped in the bud, which you will grant is at least variety. (-:

    – JdeBP
    2 days ago













2












2








2








Let's ask this question properly.



On a FreeBSD system with a loopback network interface …



% ifconfig lo0 
lo0
link up loopback drv_running running multicast
nd6 performnud auto_linklocal no_radr
link rxcsum txcsum hwcsum rxcsum_ipv6 txcsum_ipv6
link address metric 0 mtu 16384
type 24 linkstate 0 physical 0 baudrate 0
inet4 address 127.0.0.1 prefixlen 8 bdaddr 127.0.0.1
inet6 address ::1 scope 0 prefixlen 128 bdaddr ::1 scope 0
inet6 address fe80::1 scope 3 prefixlen 64
inet6 address ::2 scope 0 prefixlen 128
inet4 address 127.53.0.1 prefixlen 8 bdaddr 127.53.0.1
inet4 address 127.53.1.1 prefixlen 8 bdaddr 127.53.1.1
%


… pinging the IP address 127.0.0.2, which is not assigned to that (or to any other) network interface results in failure:



% ping -c 1 127.0.0.2 
PING 127.0.0.2 (127.0.0.2): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: Network is unreachable

--- 127.0.0.2 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss
%


The same is true for OpenBSD:



% ping -c 1 127.0.0.2 
PING 127.0.0.2 (127.0.0.2): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: Network is unreachable
ping: wrote 127.0.0.2 64 chars, ret=-1
--- 127.0.0.2 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss
%


But on Linux where there is similarly no 127.0.0.2 configured …



% ifconfig lo
lo
link up loopback running
link address 00:00:00:00:00:00 bdaddr 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet4 address 127.0.0.1 prefixlen 8 bdaddr 127.0.0.1
inet4 address 127.53.0.1 prefixlen 8 bdaddr 127.255.255.255
inet6 address ::2 scope 0 prefixlen 128
inet6 address fe80:: scope 1 prefixlen 10
inet6 address ::1 scope 0 prefixlen 128
%


… the ping is surprisingly successful:



% ping -c 1 127.0.0.2
PING 127.0.0.2 (127.0.0.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 127.0.0.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.044 ms

--- 127.0.0.2 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.044/0.044/0.044/0.000 ms
%


How come?



Related questions



  • "When does an IP address not need to be assigned to a network interface?" — the very roundabout question, asking for an explanation of "virtual interfaces", that this question asks straightforwardly

  • "How is it possible to send ping to all 127.0.0.0/8 successfully?" — several questions in one, rather than one question per question, and not in fact answered by the purported duplicate

  • "why such behavior in Linux Network over Loopback Interface" — a question about why on Linux the lo interface seems to also control the pingability of IP addresses that are assigned to other network interfaces (behaviour that is similarly not what one gets on the BSDs)

  • "What happens to local LAN traffic on linux to non-loopback addresses?" — a question about non-loopback behaviour

Oh yes it does.



  • Jonathan de Boyne Pollard (2019). ifconfig. nosh Guide. Softwares.









share|improve this question














Let's ask this question properly.



On a FreeBSD system with a loopback network interface …



% ifconfig lo0 
lo0
link up loopback drv_running running multicast
nd6 performnud auto_linklocal no_radr
link rxcsum txcsum hwcsum rxcsum_ipv6 txcsum_ipv6
link address metric 0 mtu 16384
type 24 linkstate 0 physical 0 baudrate 0
inet4 address 127.0.0.1 prefixlen 8 bdaddr 127.0.0.1
inet6 address ::1 scope 0 prefixlen 128 bdaddr ::1 scope 0
inet6 address fe80::1 scope 3 prefixlen 64
inet6 address ::2 scope 0 prefixlen 128
inet4 address 127.53.0.1 prefixlen 8 bdaddr 127.53.0.1
inet4 address 127.53.1.1 prefixlen 8 bdaddr 127.53.1.1
%


… pinging the IP address 127.0.0.2, which is not assigned to that (or to any other) network interface results in failure:



% ping -c 1 127.0.0.2 
PING 127.0.0.2 (127.0.0.2): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: Network is unreachable

--- 127.0.0.2 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss
%


The same is true for OpenBSD:



% ping -c 1 127.0.0.2 
PING 127.0.0.2 (127.0.0.2): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: Network is unreachable
ping: wrote 127.0.0.2 64 chars, ret=-1
--- 127.0.0.2 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss
%


But on Linux where there is similarly no 127.0.0.2 configured …



% ifconfig lo
lo
link up loopback running
link address 00:00:00:00:00:00 bdaddr 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet4 address 127.0.0.1 prefixlen 8 bdaddr 127.0.0.1
inet4 address 127.53.0.1 prefixlen 8 bdaddr 127.255.255.255
inet6 address ::2 scope 0 prefixlen 128
inet6 address fe80:: scope 1 prefixlen 10
inet6 address ::1 scope 0 prefixlen 128
%


… the ping is surprisingly successful:



% ping -c 1 127.0.0.2
PING 127.0.0.2 (127.0.0.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 127.0.0.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.044 ms

--- 127.0.0.2 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.044/0.044/0.044/0.000 ms
%


How come?



Related questions



  • "When does an IP address not need to be assigned to a network interface?" — the very roundabout question, asking for an explanation of "virtual interfaces", that this question asks straightforwardly

  • "How is it possible to send ping to all 127.0.0.0/8 successfully?" — several questions in one, rather than one question per question, and not in fact answered by the purported duplicate

  • "why such behavior in Linux Network over Loopback Interface" — a question about why on Linux the lo interface seems to also control the pingability of IP addresses that are assigned to other network interfaces (behaviour that is similarly not what one gets on the BSDs)

  • "What happens to local LAN traffic on linux to non-loopback addresses?" — a question about non-loopback behaviour

Oh yes it does.



  • Jonathan de Boyne Pollard (2019). ifconfig. nosh Guide. Softwares.






linux ip icmp loopback






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 days ago









JdeBPJdeBP

37.5k478180




37.5k478180







  • 3





    I don't understand the presence of the "oh yes it does" header or the disconnected link to your ifconfig utility.

    – Jeff Schaller
    2 days ago












  • @JeffSchaller it's probably about his or her ifconfig being able to show multiple ipv4 addresses assigned to the same interface, just like ip addr. The question would've been much better if only standard tools were used throughout.

    – mosvy
    2 days ago












  • Humm, is this self promotion of his (JdeBP) man page?

    – fpmurphy
    2 days ago











  • See unix.stackexchange.com/questions/363507/…

    – Johan Myréen
    2 days ago











  • Without the preëmption, experience shows that the first several comment-answers would be sage explanations of how per received wisdom ifconfig doesn't display some addresses, even perhaps one from someone feeling extra wise explaining how even the OpenBSD ifconfig doesn't or 127.0.0.2 might be on an extra interface, and suggesting that as a cause. Now it's at least instead a comment not understanding how such a wild goose chase has been nipped in the bud, which you will grant is at least variety. (-:

    – JdeBP
    2 days ago












  • 3





    I don't understand the presence of the "oh yes it does" header or the disconnected link to your ifconfig utility.

    – Jeff Schaller
    2 days ago












  • @JeffSchaller it's probably about his or her ifconfig being able to show multiple ipv4 addresses assigned to the same interface, just like ip addr. The question would've been much better if only standard tools were used throughout.

    – mosvy
    2 days ago












  • Humm, is this self promotion of his (JdeBP) man page?

    – fpmurphy
    2 days ago











  • See unix.stackexchange.com/questions/363507/…

    – Johan Myréen
    2 days ago











  • Without the preëmption, experience shows that the first several comment-answers would be sage explanations of how per received wisdom ifconfig doesn't display some addresses, even perhaps one from someone feeling extra wise explaining how even the OpenBSD ifconfig doesn't or 127.0.0.2 might be on an extra interface, and suggesting that as a cause. Now it's at least instead a comment not understanding how such a wild goose chase has been nipped in the bud, which you will grant is at least variety. (-:

    – JdeBP
    2 days ago







3




3





I don't understand the presence of the "oh yes it does" header or the disconnected link to your ifconfig utility.

– Jeff Schaller
2 days ago






I don't understand the presence of the "oh yes it does" header or the disconnected link to your ifconfig utility.

– Jeff Schaller
2 days ago














@JeffSchaller it's probably about his or her ifconfig being able to show multiple ipv4 addresses assigned to the same interface, just like ip addr. The question would've been much better if only standard tools were used throughout.

– mosvy
2 days ago






@JeffSchaller it's probably about his or her ifconfig being able to show multiple ipv4 addresses assigned to the same interface, just like ip addr. The question would've been much better if only standard tools were used throughout.

– mosvy
2 days ago














Humm, is this self promotion of his (JdeBP) man page?

– fpmurphy
2 days ago





Humm, is this self promotion of his (JdeBP) man page?

– fpmurphy
2 days ago













See unix.stackexchange.com/questions/363507/…

– Johan Myréen
2 days ago





See unix.stackexchange.com/questions/363507/…

– Johan Myréen
2 days ago













Without the preëmption, experience shows that the first several comment-answers would be sage explanations of how per received wisdom ifconfig doesn't display some addresses, even perhaps one from someone feeling extra wise explaining how even the OpenBSD ifconfig doesn't or 127.0.0.2 might be on an extra interface, and suggesting that as a cause. Now it's at least instead a comment not understanding how such a wild goose chase has been nipped in the bud, which you will grant is at least variety. (-:

– JdeBP
2 days ago





Without the preëmption, experience shows that the first several comment-answers would be sage explanations of how per received wisdom ifconfig doesn't display some addresses, even perhaps one from someone feeling extra wise explaining how even the OpenBSD ifconfig doesn't or 127.0.0.2 might be on an extra interface, and suggesting that as a cause. Now it's at least instead a comment not understanding how such a wild goose chase has been nipped in the bud, which you will grant is at least variety. (-:

– JdeBP
2 days ago










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f508157%2fhow-come-one-can-successfully-ping-127-0-0-2-on-linux%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f508157%2fhow-come-one-can-successfully-ping-127-0-0-2-on-linux%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-icmp, ip, linux, loopback

Popular posts from this blog

Frič See also Navigation menuinternal link

Identify plant with long narrow paired leaves and reddish stems Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?What is this plant with long sharp leaves? Is it a weed?What is this 3ft high, stalky plant, with mid sized narrow leaves?What is this young shrub with opposite ovate, crenate leaves and reddish stems?What is this plant with large broad serrated leaves?Identify this upright branching weed with long leaves and reddish stemsPlease help me identify this bulbous plant with long, broad leaves and white flowersWhat is this small annual with narrow gray/green leaves and rust colored daisy-type flowers?What is this chilli plant?Does anyone know what type of chilli plant this is?Help identify this plant

fontconfig warning: “/etc/fonts/fonts.conf”, line 100: unknown “element blank” The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In“tar: unrecognized option --warning” during 'apt-get install'How to fix Fontconfig errorHow do I figure out which font file is chosen for a system generic font alias?Why are some apt-get-installed fonts being ignored by fc-list, xfontsel, etc?Reload settings in /etc/fonts/conf.dTaking 30 seconds longer to boot after upgrade from jessie to stretchHow to match multiple font names with a single <match> element?Adding a custom font to fontconfigRemoving fonts from fontconfig <match> resultsBroken fonts after upgrading Firefox ESR to latest Firefox