Doesn't allowing a user mode program to access kernel space memory and execute the IN and OUT instructions defeat the purpose of having CPU modes?Questions on Linux kernel internalsHigh memory (user space) and highmem (kernel space)What mode of memory at the time linux kernel was loaded?How is user space process/thread controlled by the operating systemGet quota usage information as non-privileged userRewrite a system call in userspaceWhere are “the kernel stack”, “Frames for C run-time startup functions”, and “Frame for main()” in the memory layout of a program?What's the use of having a kernel part in the virtual memory space of Linux processes?Linux Kernel Mode Vs User ModeCan a device driver that accesses an IO device directly run in user mode?

How to resolve: Reviewer #1 says remove section X vs. Reviewer #2 says expand section X

ER diagram relationship node size adjustment

Can't make sense of a paragraph from Lovecraft

Getting the || sign while using Kurier

Giving a career talk in my old university, how prominently should I tell students my salary?

Doubts in understanding some concepts of potential energy

What's the 'present simple' form of the word "нашла́" in 3rd person singular female?

Is a piano played in the same way as a harmonium?

Rationale to prefer local variables over instance variables?

Numbers app - select all the cells on an existing table to share the same background colour?

Why couldn't the separatists legally leave the Republic?

Why does Central Limit Theorem break down in my simulation?

Can I negotiate a patent idea for a raise, under French law?

Has a sovereign Communist government ever run, and conceded loss, on a fair election?

Are all players supposed to be able to see each others' character sheets?

What are you allowed to do while using the Warlock's Eldritch Master feature?

Readonly vs static readonly clarification

Does a difference of tense count as a difference of meaning in a minimal pair?

Signed and unsigned numbers

Is it a Cyclops number? "Nobody" knows!

How is it possible to drive VGA displays at such high pixel clock frequencies?

Is it possible that a question has only two answers?

Is it safe to abruptly remove Arduino power?

Are small insurances worth it?



Doesn't allowing a user mode program to access kernel space memory and execute the IN and OUT instructions defeat the purpose of having CPU modes?


Questions on Linux kernel internalsHigh memory (user space) and highmem (kernel space)What mode of memory at the time linux kernel was loaded?How is user space process/thread controlled by the operating systemGet quota usage information as non-privileged userRewrite a system call in userspaceWhere are “the kernel stack”, “Frames for C run-time startup functions”, and “Frame for main()” in the memory layout of a program?What's the use of having a kernel part in the virtual memory space of Linux processes?Linux Kernel Mode Vs User ModeCan a device driver that accesses an IO device directly run in user mode?













1















When the CPU is in user mode, the CPU can't execute privileged instructions and can't access kernel space memory.



And when the CPU is in kernel mode, the CPU can execute all instructions and can access all memory.



Now in Linux, a user mode program can access all memory (using /dev/mem) and can execute the two privileged instructions IN and OUT (using iopl() I think).



So a user mode program in Linux can do most things (I think most things) that can be done in kernel mode.



Doesn't allowing a user mode program to have all this power defeats the purpose of having CPU modes?










share|improve this question









New contributor




user341099 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    1















    When the CPU is in user mode, the CPU can't execute privileged instructions and can't access kernel space memory.



    And when the CPU is in kernel mode, the CPU can execute all instructions and can access all memory.



    Now in Linux, a user mode program can access all memory (using /dev/mem) and can execute the two privileged instructions IN and OUT (using iopl() I think).



    So a user mode program in Linux can do most things (I think most things) that can be done in kernel mode.



    Doesn't allowing a user mode program to have all this power defeats the purpose of having CPU modes?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    user341099 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      1












      1








      1








      When the CPU is in user mode, the CPU can't execute privileged instructions and can't access kernel space memory.



      And when the CPU is in kernel mode, the CPU can execute all instructions and can access all memory.



      Now in Linux, a user mode program can access all memory (using /dev/mem) and can execute the two privileged instructions IN and OUT (using iopl() I think).



      So a user mode program in Linux can do most things (I think most things) that can be done in kernel mode.



      Doesn't allowing a user mode program to have all this power defeats the purpose of having CPU modes?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      user341099 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      When the CPU is in user mode, the CPU can't execute privileged instructions and can't access kernel space memory.



      And when the CPU is in kernel mode, the CPU can execute all instructions and can access all memory.



      Now in Linux, a user mode program can access all memory (using /dev/mem) and can execute the two privileged instructions IN and OUT (using iopl() I think).



      So a user mode program in Linux can do most things (I think most things) that can be done in kernel mode.



      Doesn't allowing a user mode program to have all this power defeats the purpose of having CPU modes?







      linux






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      user341099 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      user341099 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 30 mins ago









      ilkkachu

      60.6k1098172




      60.6k1098172






      New contributor




      user341099 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 1 hour ago









      user341099user341099

      6




      6




      New contributor




      user341099 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      user341099 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      user341099 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2















          So a user mode program in Linux can do most things (I think most things) that can be done in kernel mode.




          Well, not all use mode programs can, only those with the appropriate privileges. And that's determined by the kernel.



          /dev/mem is protected by the usual filesystem access permissions, and the CAP_SYS_RAWIO capability. iopl() and ioperm() are also restricted through the same capability.



          /dev/mem can also be compiled out of the kernel altogether (CONFIG_DEVMEM).




          Doesn't allowing a user mode program to have all this power defeats the purpose of having CPU modes?




          Well, maybe. It depends on what you want privileged user-space processes to be able to do. User-space processes can also trash the whole hard drive if they have access to /dev/sda (or equivalent), even though that defeats the purpose of having a filesystem driver to handle storage access.



          (Then there's also the fact that iopl() works by utilizing the CPU privilege modes on i386, so it can't well be said to defeat their purpose.)






          share|improve this answer
























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "106"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );






            user341099 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f505527%2fdoesnt-allowing-a-user-mode-program-to-access-kernel-space-memory-and-execute-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2















            So a user mode program in Linux can do most things (I think most things) that can be done in kernel mode.




            Well, not all use mode programs can, only those with the appropriate privileges. And that's determined by the kernel.



            /dev/mem is protected by the usual filesystem access permissions, and the CAP_SYS_RAWIO capability. iopl() and ioperm() are also restricted through the same capability.



            /dev/mem can also be compiled out of the kernel altogether (CONFIG_DEVMEM).




            Doesn't allowing a user mode program to have all this power defeats the purpose of having CPU modes?




            Well, maybe. It depends on what you want privileged user-space processes to be able to do. User-space processes can also trash the whole hard drive if they have access to /dev/sda (or equivalent), even though that defeats the purpose of having a filesystem driver to handle storage access.



            (Then there's also the fact that iopl() works by utilizing the CPU privilege modes on i386, so it can't well be said to defeat their purpose.)






            share|improve this answer





























              2















              So a user mode program in Linux can do most things (I think most things) that can be done in kernel mode.




              Well, not all use mode programs can, only those with the appropriate privileges. And that's determined by the kernel.



              /dev/mem is protected by the usual filesystem access permissions, and the CAP_SYS_RAWIO capability. iopl() and ioperm() are also restricted through the same capability.



              /dev/mem can also be compiled out of the kernel altogether (CONFIG_DEVMEM).




              Doesn't allowing a user mode program to have all this power defeats the purpose of having CPU modes?




              Well, maybe. It depends on what you want privileged user-space processes to be able to do. User-space processes can also trash the whole hard drive if they have access to /dev/sda (or equivalent), even though that defeats the purpose of having a filesystem driver to handle storage access.



              (Then there's also the fact that iopl() works by utilizing the CPU privilege modes on i386, so it can't well be said to defeat their purpose.)






              share|improve this answer



























                2












                2








                2








                So a user mode program in Linux can do most things (I think most things) that can be done in kernel mode.




                Well, not all use mode programs can, only those with the appropriate privileges. And that's determined by the kernel.



                /dev/mem is protected by the usual filesystem access permissions, and the CAP_SYS_RAWIO capability. iopl() and ioperm() are also restricted through the same capability.



                /dev/mem can also be compiled out of the kernel altogether (CONFIG_DEVMEM).




                Doesn't allowing a user mode program to have all this power defeats the purpose of having CPU modes?




                Well, maybe. It depends on what you want privileged user-space processes to be able to do. User-space processes can also trash the whole hard drive if they have access to /dev/sda (or equivalent), even though that defeats the purpose of having a filesystem driver to handle storage access.



                (Then there's also the fact that iopl() works by utilizing the CPU privilege modes on i386, so it can't well be said to defeat their purpose.)






                share|improve this answer
















                So a user mode program in Linux can do most things (I think most things) that can be done in kernel mode.




                Well, not all use mode programs can, only those with the appropriate privileges. And that's determined by the kernel.



                /dev/mem is protected by the usual filesystem access permissions, and the CAP_SYS_RAWIO capability. iopl() and ioperm() are also restricted through the same capability.



                /dev/mem can also be compiled out of the kernel altogether (CONFIG_DEVMEM).




                Doesn't allowing a user mode program to have all this power defeats the purpose of having CPU modes?




                Well, maybe. It depends on what you want privileged user-space processes to be able to do. User-space processes can also trash the whole hard drive if they have access to /dev/sda (or equivalent), even though that defeats the purpose of having a filesystem driver to handle storage access.



                (Then there's also the fact that iopl() works by utilizing the CPU privilege modes on i386, so it can't well be said to defeat their purpose.)







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 2 mins ago









                Stephen Kitt

                175k24400477




                175k24400477










                answered 33 mins ago









                ilkkachuilkkachu

                60.6k1098172




                60.6k1098172




















                    user341099 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    user341099 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    user341099 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                    user341099 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f505527%2fdoesnt-allowing-a-user-mode-program-to-access-kernel-space-memory-and-execute-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -linux

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god existsWord for having a definite opinion while simultaneously withholding judgment?What's the opposite of “newcomer? Is ”veteran" OK?What do you call an “atheist” who might believe in an afterlife?What's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Word for someone who dismisses contrary opinions as irrational?Somone who thinks they are overly special/out of the ordinaryIs there a word, phrase or idiom for “a person who is incapable of thinking about the future”?The belief that a god is human-likeA word for a non-famous person/thing you have heard a lot aboutAdjective for a person who enjoys taking care of their appearance

                    What was this official D&D 3.5e Lovecraft-flavored rulebook?What was this set of RPG tools called?As a first-time DM should I let my players play complex character classes and roles?Nymph's Kiss and the RelationshipWhat was the name of this Cleric Prestige Class that shapes metal with its bare hands?Are the 3.5e Dragonlance books third party or official works?What's up with the domain Vile Darkness?What was this 80s book about RPGs?What was the name of this Werewolf band?What book had Rituals to “upgrade” animal companions to keep them viable at higher levels?What was this RPG that had rules for player-owned businesses?

                    2017 IndyCar Series Contents Series news Teams and drivers Schedule Season summary Footnotes References External links Navigation menu"INDYCAR: Initial 2018 bodywork concepts unveiled"the original"IndyCar confirms switch to Performance Friction brakes in 2017""AJ Foyt Racing will switch to Chevy"the original"Carlos Munoz, Conor Daly will drive for AJ Foyt Racing""Zach Veach's Indy 500 Debut Confirmed with Foyt""No mass exodus from Honda after Ganassi switch""Ex-F1 driver Sato joins Andretti Autosport for 2017 IndyCar season""IndyCar's Ryan Hunter-Reay, sponsor DHL paired through 2020""hhgregg and Andretti Autosport announce partnership for key races in 2016""INDYCAR: Rossi re-signs with Andretti"the original"McLaren Formula 1 - Fernando Alonso to race at Indy 500 with McLaren, Honda and Andretti Autosport""Shank will finally take part in Indy 500 with Harvey, Andretti | MotorSportsTalk""Andretti adds Jack Harvey to Indy 500 field""Ganassi switches to Honda power for 2017""INDYCAR: Chilton returns to Ganassi"the original"IndyCar silly season: Who's going where in 2017?""INDYCAR: Kanaan, NTT Data return to Ganassi"the original"Kimball to remain at Ganassi for 2017""Coyne confirms Bourdais for 2017 IndyCar season""Davison to sub for Bourdais in Indy 500"the original"Gutierrez confirmed for Detroit IndyCar debut""Gutierrez returns with Coyne for rest of 2017 season""Vautier to drive for Coyne at Texas"the original"INDYCAR: Coyne confirms Jones for 2017"the original"Pippa Mann returns to Coyne for Indy 500""Karam, Dreyer & Reinbold teaming up again for Indianapolis 500""Pigot to return to Ed Carpenter Racing""Hildebrand confirmed as full-time Ed Carpenter driver""Veach to replace injured Hildebrand at Barber"the originalNew Team Harding Racing Enters Chaves for 101st Indianapolis 500"Juncos Racing Announces Entry in 101st Running of the Indianapolis 500 :: Juncos Racing""Juncos confirms Pigot for Indy 500""Saavedra confirmed in Juncos' second 500 entry"the original"Lazier confirms Indy 500 run after son's USF2000 debut"the original"Claman DeMelo to race for RLLR at Sonoma"the original"Rahal signs Servia and ace engineer for 2017""IndyCar: Aleshin returns with Schmidt"the original"Aleshin replaced by Saavedra for Toronto""Jack Harvey will pilot SPM No. 7 car at Watkins Glen, Sonoma""Jay Howard confirmed in Tony Stewart's supported SPM Indy entry""INDYCAR: Newgarden to wave the flag at Penske"the original"Pagenaud opts for No. 1 in 2017"the original"Penske confirms Newgarden for 2017""Montoya to stay with Team Penske in 2017""Target leaving IndyCar after 27 seasons with Chip Ganassi""Cavin: IndyCar could see complete driver/team shakeup in 2017""End of the road for KV Racing?""KV Racing confirms closure, equipment sold to Juncos""Juncos confirms IndyCar Series entry"the original"Juncos readies IndyCar program, aims for '17 500"the original"Harding Racing to add Texas, Pocono to schedule"the original"Sato signs with Andretti Autosport for 2017""INDYCAR: Aleshin in Doubt at SPM"the original"Long Beach notebook: JR Hildebrand breaks hand""Hildebrand cleared to return at Phoenix"the original"Bourdais to undergo surgery on multiple fractures""Aleshin loses Schmidt Peterson IndyCar ride""Saavedra in at SPM for Pocono, Gateway"the original"Bourdais to make return at Gateway"the original"The IndyCar Grand Prix no longer is sponsored by Angie's List""2017 IndyCar Series rulebook""2017 Verizon IndyCar Series Official Rulebook"Official websiteeeeee