Separate traffic between two tun+ devices with openvpnIptables forward with pptp and openvpnip6tables allow IPv6 traffic from OpenVPN through my VPSOpenVPN - Understand the routing table + How to route only the traffic to a specific ip via the VPNHow to create/setup vpn using only SSH?OpenVPN server with public ip forward incoming to client on tun0route traffic on certain port through certain interface?Routing traffic to my ipv4 routes except 0.0.0.0 address?How to route traffic from ethernet to a tun device (create a VPNed ethernet port)NAT ETH1 PORT 5000 Traffic to PPP0Client based routing on a gateway

What problems would a superhuman have who's skin is constantly hot?

Outlet with 3 sets of wires

Is it a Cyclops number? "Nobody" knows!

What will happen if my luggage gets delayed?

Why do we say ‘pairwise disjoint’, rather than ‘disjoint’?

Rationale to prefer local variables over instance variables?

Haman going to the second feast dirty

What do you call someone who likes to pick fights?

Having the player face themselves after the mid-game

Called into a meeting and told we are being made redundant (laid off) and "not to share outside". Can I tell my partner?

What materials can be used to make a humanoid skin warm?

Is divide-by-zero a security vulnerability?

Source permutation

Professor forcing me to attend a conference, I can't afford even with 50% funding

Signed and unsigned numbers

Expressing logarithmic equations without logs

Confusion about Complex Continued Fraction

For which categories of spectra is there an explicit description of the fibrant objects via lifting properties?

In the late 1940’s to early 1950’s what technology was available that could melt a LOT of ice?

Windows Server Datacenter Edition - Unlimited Virtual Machines

How to write a chaotic neutral protagonist and prevent my readers from thinking they are evil?

Why restrict private health insurance?

Why does cron require MTA for logging?

Why do phishing e-mails use faked e-mail addresses instead of the real one?



Separate traffic between two tun+ devices with openvpn


Iptables forward with pptp and openvpnip6tables allow IPv6 traffic from OpenVPN through my VPSOpenVPN - Understand the routing table + How to route only the traffic to a specific ip via the VPNHow to create/setup vpn using only SSH?OpenVPN server with public ip forward incoming to client on tun0route traffic on certain port through certain interface?Routing traffic to my ipv4 routes except 0.0.0.0 address?How to route traffic from ethernet to a tun device (create a VPNed ethernet port)NAT ETH1 PORT 5000 Traffic to PPP0Client based routing on a gateway













0















I'm running two OpenVPN clients, so I have two tun interfaces configured.



Each of the tun interfaces has a different subnet. One of the interfaces, let's say tun1 has a default route, so most of my traffic goes through there.



My tun0 interface however, does not have a default route, so only packets to it's subnet are routed through this interface.



The problem is that packets that are supposed to go through tun0 => eth0, are going through tun0 => tun1 => eth0. This does make sense, because tun1 is used as a default device.



How can I prevent packets in my private network from being routed through both VPNs and make them routed only through one of the VPNs?



Update:



Here is my current routing table:



0.0.0.0/1 via 10.4.102.81 dev tun1 
default via 192.168.10.1 dev eth0 proto static
10.4.0.1 via 10.4.102.81 dev tun1
10.4.102.81 dev tun1 proto kernel scope link src 10.4.102.82
10.176.128.0/18 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.177.0.0/18 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.177.128.0/18 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.178.0.0/16 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.179.0.0/16 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.180.0.0/16 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.181.0.0/16 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.183.0.0/16 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
46.165.208.65 via 192.168.10.1 dev eth0
128.0.0.0/1 via 10.4.102.81 dev tun1
172.29.0.0/22 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
172.29.2.77 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 172.29.2.78
172.31.0.0/22 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
192.168.10.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.10.76 metric 1









share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 5 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.










  • 1





    Can you post your routes (=output of ip r) and the subnet IPs, please?

    – jofel
    Jun 6 '14 at 11:25











  • What is the source and destination of the traffic that's routing through the tunnels?

    – Matt
    Jun 6 '14 at 12:12











  • tun1 not has default route. 0.0.0.0/1 - just half of all ipv4 diapason.

    – mr_tron
    Jun 6 '14 at 13:29











  • Yes that is the first line, then I have 128.0.0.0/1 via 10.4.102.81 dev tun1 for the second half

    – simao
    Jun 6 '14 at 14:19















0















I'm running two OpenVPN clients, so I have two tun interfaces configured.



Each of the tun interfaces has a different subnet. One of the interfaces, let's say tun1 has a default route, so most of my traffic goes through there.



My tun0 interface however, does not have a default route, so only packets to it's subnet are routed through this interface.



The problem is that packets that are supposed to go through tun0 => eth0, are going through tun0 => tun1 => eth0. This does make sense, because tun1 is used as a default device.



How can I prevent packets in my private network from being routed through both VPNs and make them routed only through one of the VPNs?



Update:



Here is my current routing table:



0.0.0.0/1 via 10.4.102.81 dev tun1 
default via 192.168.10.1 dev eth0 proto static
10.4.0.1 via 10.4.102.81 dev tun1
10.4.102.81 dev tun1 proto kernel scope link src 10.4.102.82
10.176.128.0/18 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.177.0.0/18 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.177.128.0/18 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.178.0.0/16 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.179.0.0/16 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.180.0.0/16 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.181.0.0/16 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.183.0.0/16 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
46.165.208.65 via 192.168.10.1 dev eth0
128.0.0.0/1 via 10.4.102.81 dev tun1
172.29.0.0/22 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
172.29.2.77 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 172.29.2.78
172.31.0.0/22 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
192.168.10.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.10.76 metric 1









share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 5 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.










  • 1





    Can you post your routes (=output of ip r) and the subnet IPs, please?

    – jofel
    Jun 6 '14 at 11:25











  • What is the source and destination of the traffic that's routing through the tunnels?

    – Matt
    Jun 6 '14 at 12:12











  • tun1 not has default route. 0.0.0.0/1 - just half of all ipv4 diapason.

    – mr_tron
    Jun 6 '14 at 13:29











  • Yes that is the first line, then I have 128.0.0.0/1 via 10.4.102.81 dev tun1 for the second half

    – simao
    Jun 6 '14 at 14:19













0












0








0








I'm running two OpenVPN clients, so I have two tun interfaces configured.



Each of the tun interfaces has a different subnet. One of the interfaces, let's say tun1 has a default route, so most of my traffic goes through there.



My tun0 interface however, does not have a default route, so only packets to it's subnet are routed through this interface.



The problem is that packets that are supposed to go through tun0 => eth0, are going through tun0 => tun1 => eth0. This does make sense, because tun1 is used as a default device.



How can I prevent packets in my private network from being routed through both VPNs and make them routed only through one of the VPNs?



Update:



Here is my current routing table:



0.0.0.0/1 via 10.4.102.81 dev tun1 
default via 192.168.10.1 dev eth0 proto static
10.4.0.1 via 10.4.102.81 dev tun1
10.4.102.81 dev tun1 proto kernel scope link src 10.4.102.82
10.176.128.0/18 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.177.0.0/18 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.177.128.0/18 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.178.0.0/16 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.179.0.0/16 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.180.0.0/16 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.181.0.0/16 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.183.0.0/16 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
46.165.208.65 via 192.168.10.1 dev eth0
128.0.0.0/1 via 10.4.102.81 dev tun1
172.29.0.0/22 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
172.29.2.77 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 172.29.2.78
172.31.0.0/22 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
192.168.10.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.10.76 metric 1









share|improve this question
















I'm running two OpenVPN clients, so I have two tun interfaces configured.



Each of the tun interfaces has a different subnet. One of the interfaces, let's say tun1 has a default route, so most of my traffic goes through there.



My tun0 interface however, does not have a default route, so only packets to it's subnet are routed through this interface.



The problem is that packets that are supposed to go through tun0 => eth0, are going through tun0 => tun1 => eth0. This does make sense, because tun1 is used as a default device.



How can I prevent packets in my private network from being routed through both VPNs and make them routed only through one of the VPNs?



Update:



Here is my current routing table:



0.0.0.0/1 via 10.4.102.81 dev tun1 
default via 192.168.10.1 dev eth0 proto static
10.4.0.1 via 10.4.102.81 dev tun1
10.4.102.81 dev tun1 proto kernel scope link src 10.4.102.82
10.176.128.0/18 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.177.0.0/18 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.177.128.0/18 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.178.0.0/16 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.179.0.0/16 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.180.0.0/16 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.181.0.0/16 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
10.183.0.0/16 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
46.165.208.65 via 192.168.10.1 dev eth0
128.0.0.0/1 via 10.4.102.81 dev tun1
172.29.0.0/22 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
172.29.2.77 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 172.29.2.78
172.31.0.0/22 via 172.29.2.77 dev tun0
192.168.10.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.10.76 metric 1






openvpn route






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jun 6 '14 at 12:40







simao

















asked Jun 6 '14 at 9:50









simaosimao

15416




15416





bumped to the homepage by Community 5 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 5 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.









  • 1





    Can you post your routes (=output of ip r) and the subnet IPs, please?

    – jofel
    Jun 6 '14 at 11:25











  • What is the source and destination of the traffic that's routing through the tunnels?

    – Matt
    Jun 6 '14 at 12:12











  • tun1 not has default route. 0.0.0.0/1 - just half of all ipv4 diapason.

    – mr_tron
    Jun 6 '14 at 13:29











  • Yes that is the first line, then I have 128.0.0.0/1 via 10.4.102.81 dev tun1 for the second half

    – simao
    Jun 6 '14 at 14:19












  • 1





    Can you post your routes (=output of ip r) and the subnet IPs, please?

    – jofel
    Jun 6 '14 at 11:25











  • What is the source and destination of the traffic that's routing through the tunnels?

    – Matt
    Jun 6 '14 at 12:12











  • tun1 not has default route. 0.0.0.0/1 - just half of all ipv4 diapason.

    – mr_tron
    Jun 6 '14 at 13:29











  • Yes that is the first line, then I have 128.0.0.0/1 via 10.4.102.81 dev tun1 for the second half

    – simao
    Jun 6 '14 at 14:19







1




1





Can you post your routes (=output of ip r) and the subnet IPs, please?

– jofel
Jun 6 '14 at 11:25





Can you post your routes (=output of ip r) and the subnet IPs, please?

– jofel
Jun 6 '14 at 11:25













What is the source and destination of the traffic that's routing through the tunnels?

– Matt
Jun 6 '14 at 12:12





What is the source and destination of the traffic that's routing through the tunnels?

– Matt
Jun 6 '14 at 12:12













tun1 not has default route. 0.0.0.0/1 - just half of all ipv4 diapason.

– mr_tron
Jun 6 '14 at 13:29





tun1 not has default route. 0.0.0.0/1 - just half of all ipv4 diapason.

– mr_tron
Jun 6 '14 at 13:29













Yes that is the first line, then I have 128.0.0.0/1 via 10.4.102.81 dev tun1 for the second half

– simao
Jun 6 '14 at 14:19





Yes that is the first line, then I have 128.0.0.0/1 via 10.4.102.81 dev tun1 for the second half

– simao
Jun 6 '14 at 14:19










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














You should add a route for the remote VPN servers (the tun0 one):



ip add route $ip_of_the_vpn_server via 192.168.10.1 dev eth0


or more generically:



ip add route $(ip route get $ip_of_the_vpn_server | head -n1)


before starting the VPN.



This will ensure that all packets to this VPN server will be sent by your non-VPN-default route.






share|improve this answer






















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134823%2fseparate-traffic-between-two-tun-devices-with-openvpn%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    You should add a route for the remote VPN servers (the tun0 one):



    ip add route $ip_of_the_vpn_server via 192.168.10.1 dev eth0


    or more generically:



    ip add route $(ip route get $ip_of_the_vpn_server | head -n1)


    before starting the VPN.



    This will ensure that all packets to this VPN server will be sent by your non-VPN-default route.






    share|improve this answer



























      0














      You should add a route for the remote VPN servers (the tun0 one):



      ip add route $ip_of_the_vpn_server via 192.168.10.1 dev eth0


      or more generically:



      ip add route $(ip route get $ip_of_the_vpn_server | head -n1)


      before starting the VPN.



      This will ensure that all packets to this VPN server will be sent by your non-VPN-default route.






      share|improve this answer

























        0












        0








        0







        You should add a route for the remote VPN servers (the tun0 one):



        ip add route $ip_of_the_vpn_server via 192.168.10.1 dev eth0


        or more generically:



        ip add route $(ip route get $ip_of_the_vpn_server | head -n1)


        before starting the VPN.



        This will ensure that all packets to this VPN server will be sent by your non-VPN-default route.






        share|improve this answer













        You should add a route for the remote VPN servers (the tun0 one):



        ip add route $ip_of_the_vpn_server via 192.168.10.1 dev eth0


        or more generically:



        ip add route $(ip route get $ip_of_the_vpn_server | head -n1)


        before starting the VPN.



        This will ensure that all packets to this VPN server will be sent by your non-VPN-default route.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Jun 12 '14 at 21:57









        ysdxysdx

        1,222913




        1,222913



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134823%2fseparate-traffic-between-two-tun-devices-with-openvpn%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -openvpn, route

            Popular posts from this blog

            Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god existsWord for having a definite opinion while simultaneously withholding judgment?What's the opposite of “newcomer? Is ”veteran" OK?What do you call an “atheist” who might believe in an afterlife?What's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Word for someone who dismisses contrary opinions as irrational?Somone who thinks they are overly special/out of the ordinaryIs there a word, phrase or idiom for “a person who is incapable of thinking about the future”?The belief that a god is human-likeA word for a non-famous person/thing you have heard a lot aboutAdjective for a person who enjoys taking care of their appearance

            What was this official D&D 3.5e Lovecraft-flavored rulebook?What was this set of RPG tools called?As a first-time DM should I let my players play complex character classes and roles?Nymph's Kiss and the RelationshipWhat was the name of this Cleric Prestige Class that shapes metal with its bare hands?Are the 3.5e Dragonlance books third party or official works?What's up with the domain Vile Darkness?What was this 80s book about RPGs?What was the name of this Werewolf band?What book had Rituals to “upgrade” animal companions to keep them viable at higher levels?What was this RPG that had rules for player-owned businesses?

            2017 IndyCar Series Contents Series news Teams and drivers Schedule Season summary Footnotes References External links Navigation menu"INDYCAR: Initial 2018 bodywork concepts unveiled"the original"IndyCar confirms switch to Performance Friction brakes in 2017""AJ Foyt Racing will switch to Chevy"the original"Carlos Munoz, Conor Daly will drive for AJ Foyt Racing""Zach Veach's Indy 500 Debut Confirmed with Foyt""No mass exodus from Honda after Ganassi switch""Ex-F1 driver Sato joins Andretti Autosport for 2017 IndyCar season""IndyCar's Ryan Hunter-Reay, sponsor DHL paired through 2020""hhgregg and Andretti Autosport announce partnership for key races in 2016""INDYCAR: Rossi re-signs with Andretti"the original"McLaren Formula 1 - Fernando Alonso to race at Indy 500 with McLaren, Honda and Andretti Autosport""Shank will finally take part in Indy 500 with Harvey, Andretti | MotorSportsTalk""Andretti adds Jack Harvey to Indy 500 field""Ganassi switches to Honda power for 2017""INDYCAR: Chilton returns to Ganassi"the original"IndyCar silly season: Who's going where in 2017?""INDYCAR: Kanaan, NTT Data return to Ganassi"the original"Kimball to remain at Ganassi for 2017""Coyne confirms Bourdais for 2017 IndyCar season""Davison to sub for Bourdais in Indy 500"the original"Gutierrez confirmed for Detroit IndyCar debut""Gutierrez returns with Coyne for rest of 2017 season""Vautier to drive for Coyne at Texas"the original"INDYCAR: Coyne confirms Jones for 2017"the original"Pippa Mann returns to Coyne for Indy 500""Karam, Dreyer & Reinbold teaming up again for Indianapolis 500""Pigot to return to Ed Carpenter Racing""Hildebrand confirmed as full-time Ed Carpenter driver""Veach to replace injured Hildebrand at Barber"the originalNew Team Harding Racing Enters Chaves for 101st Indianapolis 500"Juncos Racing Announces Entry in 101st Running of the Indianapolis 500 :: Juncos Racing""Juncos confirms Pigot for Indy 500""Saavedra confirmed in Juncos' second 500 entry"the original"Lazier confirms Indy 500 run after son's USF2000 debut"the original"Claman DeMelo to race for RLLR at Sonoma"the original"Rahal signs Servia and ace engineer for 2017""IndyCar: Aleshin returns with Schmidt"the original"Aleshin replaced by Saavedra for Toronto""Jack Harvey will pilot SPM No. 7 car at Watkins Glen, Sonoma""Jay Howard confirmed in Tony Stewart's supported SPM Indy entry""INDYCAR: Newgarden to wave the flag at Penske"the original"Pagenaud opts for No. 1 in 2017"the original"Penske confirms Newgarden for 2017""Montoya to stay with Team Penske in 2017""Target leaving IndyCar after 27 seasons with Chip Ganassi""Cavin: IndyCar could see complete driver/team shakeup in 2017""End of the road for KV Racing?""KV Racing confirms closure, equipment sold to Juncos""Juncos confirms IndyCar Series entry"the original"Juncos readies IndyCar program, aims for '17 500"the original"Harding Racing to add Texas, Pocono to schedule"the original"Sato signs with Andretti Autosport for 2017""INDYCAR: Aleshin in Doubt at SPM"the original"Long Beach notebook: JR Hildebrand breaks hand""Hildebrand cleared to return at Phoenix"the original"Bourdais to undergo surgery on multiple fractures""Aleshin loses Schmidt Peterson IndyCar ride""Saavedra in at SPM for Pocono, Gateway"the original"Bourdais to make return at Gateway"the original"The IndyCar Grand Prix no longer is sponsored by Angie's List""2017 IndyCar Series rulebook""2017 Verizon IndyCar Series Official Rulebook"Official websiteeeeee