Linux can't read and write, but windows canCannot mount second 1TB harddrive in Linux, works fine in Windows 8.1How to mount sdb directly or using LVM partitions on sda?Can't write on recently created EXT4 partitionCan't mount anywhere but to /mntIs it possible to mount ~/.ipfs folder to an external drive?Use external drive as a folder in nginxHow to auto-mount HDD within encrypted /home partition/directory?Mounting a 4tb lvm in Centos 7 keeps saying not enough space on deviceDifferent EFIs and Windows dual bootingWrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdX

Giving a career talk in my old university, how prominently should I tell students my salary?

Plausibility of Mushroom Buildings

Which classes are needed to have access to every spell in the PHB?

Power Strip for Europe

Does an unused member variable take up memory?

What materials can be used to make a humanoid skin warm?

Can the alpha, lambda values of a glmnet object output determine whether ridge or Lasso?

From an axiomatic set theoric approach why can we take uncountable unions?

Shifting between bemols and diesis in the key signature

Is it possible that a question has only two answers?

How do electrons receive energy when a body is heated?

When a wind turbine does not produce enough electricity how does the power company compensate for the loss?

Are all players supposed to be able to see each others' character sheets?

Called into a meeting and told we are being made redundant (laid off) and "not to share outside". Can I tell my partner?

What would be the most expensive material to an intergalactic society?

I reported the illegal activity of my boss to his boss. My boss found out. Now I am being punished. What should I do?

PTIJ: Why does only a Shor Tam ask at the Seder, and not a Shor Mu'ad?

Recommendation letter by significant other if you worked with them professionally?

Has a sovereign Communist government ever run, and conceded loss, on a fair election?

Why restrict private health insurance?

For which categories of spectra is there an explicit description of the fibrant objects via lifting properties?

After `ssh` without `-X` to a machine, is it possible to change `$DISPLAY` to make it work like `ssh -X`?

Why do we say ‘pairwise disjoint’, rather than ‘disjoint’?

When Schnorr signatures are part of Bitcoin will it be possible validate each block with only one signature validation?



Linux can't read and write, but windows can


Cannot mount second 1TB harddrive in Linux, works fine in Windows 8.1How to mount sdb directly or using LVM partitions on sda?Can't write on recently created EXT4 partitionCan't mount anywhere but to /mntIs it possible to mount ~/.ipfs folder to an external drive?Use external drive as a folder in nginxHow to auto-mount HDD within encrypted /home partition/directory?Mounting a 4tb lvm in Centos 7 keeps saying not enough space on deviceDifferent EFIs and Windows dual bootingWrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdX













0















I have a hard drive with a lot of back up files, that were created by PhotoRec. When mounting it with a windows computer I can read all the files perfectly fine. Under linux I get an error when trying to look at the folder that contains all my backups. The rest of the hard drive is perfectly readable but when I try to ls the backup folder I get



ls: reading directory .: Input/output error



In Dolphin I just see a blank directory. I have tried letting arch auto mount and I have tried manually mounting it with -t ntfs-3g option (only flag used). A strange thing I notice is that if I manually mount it with the 3g option then all permissions are -rwxrwxrwx but if I let it be automatically mounted I have permissions -rw------- 1 steven steven (some have 2, but not many. The directories show d as they should). These are the same for every file and directory on the system.



I don't understand why I can't see these files under Linux, but can under Windows. I even booted up SystemRescueCD again to see if it recognized it, but it couldn't even see the files (even though it was what had originally written the files in the first place). What is so weird to me is that I can read everything on the hard drive except that one folder. It has the exact same permissions as everything else in the hard drive.



Additional info:



This is a fresh install of Arch. As of today.



[steven@serenity ~]$ uname -a
Linux serenity 3.16.1-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Aug 14 07:40:19 CEST 2014 x86_64 GNU/Linux



(auto mounted)



[steven@serenity ~]$ sudo fdisk -l

Disk /dev/sdb: 596.2 GiB, 640135028736 bytes, 1250263728 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x1549f232

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sdb1 * 63 1250258159 1250258097 596.2G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT









share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 1 hour ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • You say you can't see anything in the directory, but also give permissions for "every file and directory" in it - I'm not sure how those fit together. Could you clarify what you can and can't see, and what is happening with each way of mounting?

    – Michael Homer
    Aug 31 '14 at 23:14











  • @MichaelHomer sorry, I'll clear this up in the OP. It is only a single folder that this error is happening on the hard drive.

    – Steven Walton
    Aug 31 '14 at 23:49











  • did you try running chkdsk from windows?

    – pqnet
    Sep 1 '14 at 7:48















0















I have a hard drive with a lot of back up files, that were created by PhotoRec. When mounting it with a windows computer I can read all the files perfectly fine. Under linux I get an error when trying to look at the folder that contains all my backups. The rest of the hard drive is perfectly readable but when I try to ls the backup folder I get



ls: reading directory .: Input/output error



In Dolphin I just see a blank directory. I have tried letting arch auto mount and I have tried manually mounting it with -t ntfs-3g option (only flag used). A strange thing I notice is that if I manually mount it with the 3g option then all permissions are -rwxrwxrwx but if I let it be automatically mounted I have permissions -rw------- 1 steven steven (some have 2, but not many. The directories show d as they should). These are the same for every file and directory on the system.



I don't understand why I can't see these files under Linux, but can under Windows. I even booted up SystemRescueCD again to see if it recognized it, but it couldn't even see the files (even though it was what had originally written the files in the first place). What is so weird to me is that I can read everything on the hard drive except that one folder. It has the exact same permissions as everything else in the hard drive.



Additional info:



This is a fresh install of Arch. As of today.



[steven@serenity ~]$ uname -a
Linux serenity 3.16.1-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Aug 14 07:40:19 CEST 2014 x86_64 GNU/Linux



(auto mounted)



[steven@serenity ~]$ sudo fdisk -l

Disk /dev/sdb: 596.2 GiB, 640135028736 bytes, 1250263728 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x1549f232

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sdb1 * 63 1250258159 1250258097 596.2G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT









share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 1 hour ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • You say you can't see anything in the directory, but also give permissions for "every file and directory" in it - I'm not sure how those fit together. Could you clarify what you can and can't see, and what is happening with each way of mounting?

    – Michael Homer
    Aug 31 '14 at 23:14











  • @MichaelHomer sorry, I'll clear this up in the OP. It is only a single folder that this error is happening on the hard drive.

    – Steven Walton
    Aug 31 '14 at 23:49











  • did you try running chkdsk from windows?

    – pqnet
    Sep 1 '14 at 7:48













0












0








0








I have a hard drive with a lot of back up files, that were created by PhotoRec. When mounting it with a windows computer I can read all the files perfectly fine. Under linux I get an error when trying to look at the folder that contains all my backups. The rest of the hard drive is perfectly readable but when I try to ls the backup folder I get



ls: reading directory .: Input/output error



In Dolphin I just see a blank directory. I have tried letting arch auto mount and I have tried manually mounting it with -t ntfs-3g option (only flag used). A strange thing I notice is that if I manually mount it with the 3g option then all permissions are -rwxrwxrwx but if I let it be automatically mounted I have permissions -rw------- 1 steven steven (some have 2, but not many. The directories show d as they should). These are the same for every file and directory on the system.



I don't understand why I can't see these files under Linux, but can under Windows. I even booted up SystemRescueCD again to see if it recognized it, but it couldn't even see the files (even though it was what had originally written the files in the first place). What is so weird to me is that I can read everything on the hard drive except that one folder. It has the exact same permissions as everything else in the hard drive.



Additional info:



This is a fresh install of Arch. As of today.



[steven@serenity ~]$ uname -a
Linux serenity 3.16.1-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Aug 14 07:40:19 CEST 2014 x86_64 GNU/Linux



(auto mounted)



[steven@serenity ~]$ sudo fdisk -l

Disk /dev/sdb: 596.2 GiB, 640135028736 bytes, 1250263728 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x1549f232

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sdb1 * 63 1250258159 1250258097 596.2G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT









share|improve this question
















I have a hard drive with a lot of back up files, that were created by PhotoRec. When mounting it with a windows computer I can read all the files perfectly fine. Under linux I get an error when trying to look at the folder that contains all my backups. The rest of the hard drive is perfectly readable but when I try to ls the backup folder I get



ls: reading directory .: Input/output error



In Dolphin I just see a blank directory. I have tried letting arch auto mount and I have tried manually mounting it with -t ntfs-3g option (only flag used). A strange thing I notice is that if I manually mount it with the 3g option then all permissions are -rwxrwxrwx but if I let it be automatically mounted I have permissions -rw------- 1 steven steven (some have 2, but not many. The directories show d as they should). These are the same for every file and directory on the system.



I don't understand why I can't see these files under Linux, but can under Windows. I even booted up SystemRescueCD again to see if it recognized it, but it couldn't even see the files (even though it was what had originally written the files in the first place). What is so weird to me is that I can read everything on the hard drive except that one folder. It has the exact same permissions as everything else in the hard drive.



Additional info:



This is a fresh install of Arch. As of today.



[steven@serenity ~]$ uname -a
Linux serenity 3.16.1-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Aug 14 07:40:19 CEST 2014 x86_64 GNU/Linux



(auto mounted)



[steven@serenity ~]$ sudo fdisk -l

Disk /dev/sdb: 596.2 GiB, 640135028736 bytes, 1250263728 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x1549f232

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sdb1 * 63 1250258159 1250258097 596.2G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT






arch-linux mount ls






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 1 '14 at 2:26









Ramesh

23.8k34104186




23.8k34104186










asked Aug 31 '14 at 22:50









Steven WaltonSteven Walton

398112




398112





bumped to the homepage by Community 1 hour ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 1 hour ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.














  • You say you can't see anything in the directory, but also give permissions for "every file and directory" in it - I'm not sure how those fit together. Could you clarify what you can and can't see, and what is happening with each way of mounting?

    – Michael Homer
    Aug 31 '14 at 23:14











  • @MichaelHomer sorry, I'll clear this up in the OP. It is only a single folder that this error is happening on the hard drive.

    – Steven Walton
    Aug 31 '14 at 23:49











  • did you try running chkdsk from windows?

    – pqnet
    Sep 1 '14 at 7:48

















  • You say you can't see anything in the directory, but also give permissions for "every file and directory" in it - I'm not sure how those fit together. Could you clarify what you can and can't see, and what is happening with each way of mounting?

    – Michael Homer
    Aug 31 '14 at 23:14











  • @MichaelHomer sorry, I'll clear this up in the OP. It is only a single folder that this error is happening on the hard drive.

    – Steven Walton
    Aug 31 '14 at 23:49











  • did you try running chkdsk from windows?

    – pqnet
    Sep 1 '14 at 7:48
















You say you can't see anything in the directory, but also give permissions for "every file and directory" in it - I'm not sure how those fit together. Could you clarify what you can and can't see, and what is happening with each way of mounting?

– Michael Homer
Aug 31 '14 at 23:14





You say you can't see anything in the directory, but also give permissions for "every file and directory" in it - I'm not sure how those fit together. Could you clarify what you can and can't see, and what is happening with each way of mounting?

– Michael Homer
Aug 31 '14 at 23:14













@MichaelHomer sorry, I'll clear this up in the OP. It is only a single folder that this error is happening on the hard drive.

– Steven Walton
Aug 31 '14 at 23:49





@MichaelHomer sorry, I'll clear this up in the OP. It is only a single folder that this error is happening on the hard drive.

– Steven Walton
Aug 31 '14 at 23:49













did you try running chkdsk from windows?

– pqnet
Sep 1 '14 at 7:48





did you try running chkdsk from windows?

– pqnet
Sep 1 '14 at 7:48










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














The errors indicate a hardware problem with the disk but only on sectors containing the data.



The reason that under Windows you don't see these errors (until now), is probably caused by the difference in file browsing software: most Linux file browsers read more of the file information, from the file when opening a folder, than Windows Explorer does. This is to try and make previews, and have meta-data for the files available. Windows is probably only retrieving this when explicitly asked for.



You can try and see if you can copy all of the files under Windows to a separate disc. If that works run some thorough disk analyser on the original disk before continuing to use it (after making a full backup).






share|improve this answer























  • But I can open the files under the Windows system. And a hardware problem only on these sectors seems kind of weird...

    – Steven Walton
    Sep 1 '14 at 4:57











  • @StevenWalton I'm just guessing, but opening doesn't necessarily mean complete reading. If you had a headcrash, as little as one sector could be affected, although usually there is more. How long does it take (under Linux) to get the error (i.e. is the system obviously retrying before giving up)?

    – Anthon
    Sep 1 '14 at 4:59












  • Yeah, it just seems HIGHLY unlikely that the there is a hardware problem on only a certain section of a hdd. And I get the ls error immediately. If opening through dolphin it starts to scan then fails. I can even open the files in windows though. So if it is corrupted, it isn't in that way. Why can I open it in Windows and not Linux? Usually it's the other way around, or at least I can diagnose better. But I can't find anything.

    – Steven Walton
    Sep 1 '14 at 7:13











  • What happens if you copy the files, preferably to another disk/SD etc. under Windows and then access those from Linux?

    – Anthon
    Sep 1 '14 at 7:31










Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f153068%2flinux-cant-read-and-write-but-windows-can%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














The errors indicate a hardware problem with the disk but only on sectors containing the data.



The reason that under Windows you don't see these errors (until now), is probably caused by the difference in file browsing software: most Linux file browsers read more of the file information, from the file when opening a folder, than Windows Explorer does. This is to try and make previews, and have meta-data for the files available. Windows is probably only retrieving this when explicitly asked for.



You can try and see if you can copy all of the files under Windows to a separate disc. If that works run some thorough disk analyser on the original disk before continuing to use it (after making a full backup).






share|improve this answer























  • But I can open the files under the Windows system. And a hardware problem only on these sectors seems kind of weird...

    – Steven Walton
    Sep 1 '14 at 4:57











  • @StevenWalton I'm just guessing, but opening doesn't necessarily mean complete reading. If you had a headcrash, as little as one sector could be affected, although usually there is more. How long does it take (under Linux) to get the error (i.e. is the system obviously retrying before giving up)?

    – Anthon
    Sep 1 '14 at 4:59












  • Yeah, it just seems HIGHLY unlikely that the there is a hardware problem on only a certain section of a hdd. And I get the ls error immediately. If opening through dolphin it starts to scan then fails. I can even open the files in windows though. So if it is corrupted, it isn't in that way. Why can I open it in Windows and not Linux? Usually it's the other way around, or at least I can diagnose better. But I can't find anything.

    – Steven Walton
    Sep 1 '14 at 7:13











  • What happens if you copy the files, preferably to another disk/SD etc. under Windows and then access those from Linux?

    – Anthon
    Sep 1 '14 at 7:31















0














The errors indicate a hardware problem with the disk but only on sectors containing the data.



The reason that under Windows you don't see these errors (until now), is probably caused by the difference in file browsing software: most Linux file browsers read more of the file information, from the file when opening a folder, than Windows Explorer does. This is to try and make previews, and have meta-data for the files available. Windows is probably only retrieving this when explicitly asked for.



You can try and see if you can copy all of the files under Windows to a separate disc. If that works run some thorough disk analyser on the original disk before continuing to use it (after making a full backup).






share|improve this answer























  • But I can open the files under the Windows system. And a hardware problem only on these sectors seems kind of weird...

    – Steven Walton
    Sep 1 '14 at 4:57











  • @StevenWalton I'm just guessing, but opening doesn't necessarily mean complete reading. If you had a headcrash, as little as one sector could be affected, although usually there is more. How long does it take (under Linux) to get the error (i.e. is the system obviously retrying before giving up)?

    – Anthon
    Sep 1 '14 at 4:59












  • Yeah, it just seems HIGHLY unlikely that the there is a hardware problem on only a certain section of a hdd. And I get the ls error immediately. If opening through dolphin it starts to scan then fails. I can even open the files in windows though. So if it is corrupted, it isn't in that way. Why can I open it in Windows and not Linux? Usually it's the other way around, or at least I can diagnose better. But I can't find anything.

    – Steven Walton
    Sep 1 '14 at 7:13











  • What happens if you copy the files, preferably to another disk/SD etc. under Windows and then access those from Linux?

    – Anthon
    Sep 1 '14 at 7:31













0












0








0







The errors indicate a hardware problem with the disk but only on sectors containing the data.



The reason that under Windows you don't see these errors (until now), is probably caused by the difference in file browsing software: most Linux file browsers read more of the file information, from the file when opening a folder, than Windows Explorer does. This is to try and make previews, and have meta-data for the files available. Windows is probably only retrieving this when explicitly asked for.



You can try and see if you can copy all of the files under Windows to a separate disc. If that works run some thorough disk analyser on the original disk before continuing to use it (after making a full backup).






share|improve this answer













The errors indicate a hardware problem with the disk but only on sectors containing the data.



The reason that under Windows you don't see these errors (until now), is probably caused by the difference in file browsing software: most Linux file browsers read more of the file information, from the file when opening a folder, than Windows Explorer does. This is to try and make previews, and have meta-data for the files available. Windows is probably only retrieving this when explicitly asked for.



You can try and see if you can copy all of the files under Windows to a separate disc. If that works run some thorough disk analyser on the original disk before continuing to use it (after making a full backup).







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Sep 1 '14 at 3:28









AnthonAnthon

61.1k17104167




61.1k17104167












  • But I can open the files under the Windows system. And a hardware problem only on these sectors seems kind of weird...

    – Steven Walton
    Sep 1 '14 at 4:57











  • @StevenWalton I'm just guessing, but opening doesn't necessarily mean complete reading. If you had a headcrash, as little as one sector could be affected, although usually there is more. How long does it take (under Linux) to get the error (i.e. is the system obviously retrying before giving up)?

    – Anthon
    Sep 1 '14 at 4:59












  • Yeah, it just seems HIGHLY unlikely that the there is a hardware problem on only a certain section of a hdd. And I get the ls error immediately. If opening through dolphin it starts to scan then fails. I can even open the files in windows though. So if it is corrupted, it isn't in that way. Why can I open it in Windows and not Linux? Usually it's the other way around, or at least I can diagnose better. But I can't find anything.

    – Steven Walton
    Sep 1 '14 at 7:13











  • What happens if you copy the files, preferably to another disk/SD etc. under Windows and then access those from Linux?

    – Anthon
    Sep 1 '14 at 7:31

















  • But I can open the files under the Windows system. And a hardware problem only on these sectors seems kind of weird...

    – Steven Walton
    Sep 1 '14 at 4:57











  • @StevenWalton I'm just guessing, but opening doesn't necessarily mean complete reading. If you had a headcrash, as little as one sector could be affected, although usually there is more. How long does it take (under Linux) to get the error (i.e. is the system obviously retrying before giving up)?

    – Anthon
    Sep 1 '14 at 4:59












  • Yeah, it just seems HIGHLY unlikely that the there is a hardware problem on only a certain section of a hdd. And I get the ls error immediately. If opening through dolphin it starts to scan then fails. I can even open the files in windows though. So if it is corrupted, it isn't in that way. Why can I open it in Windows and not Linux? Usually it's the other way around, or at least I can diagnose better. But I can't find anything.

    – Steven Walton
    Sep 1 '14 at 7:13











  • What happens if you copy the files, preferably to another disk/SD etc. under Windows and then access those from Linux?

    – Anthon
    Sep 1 '14 at 7:31
















But I can open the files under the Windows system. And a hardware problem only on these sectors seems kind of weird...

– Steven Walton
Sep 1 '14 at 4:57





But I can open the files under the Windows system. And a hardware problem only on these sectors seems kind of weird...

– Steven Walton
Sep 1 '14 at 4:57













@StevenWalton I'm just guessing, but opening doesn't necessarily mean complete reading. If you had a headcrash, as little as one sector could be affected, although usually there is more. How long does it take (under Linux) to get the error (i.e. is the system obviously retrying before giving up)?

– Anthon
Sep 1 '14 at 4:59






@StevenWalton I'm just guessing, but opening doesn't necessarily mean complete reading. If you had a headcrash, as little as one sector could be affected, although usually there is more. How long does it take (under Linux) to get the error (i.e. is the system obviously retrying before giving up)?

– Anthon
Sep 1 '14 at 4:59














Yeah, it just seems HIGHLY unlikely that the there is a hardware problem on only a certain section of a hdd. And I get the ls error immediately. If opening through dolphin it starts to scan then fails. I can even open the files in windows though. So if it is corrupted, it isn't in that way. Why can I open it in Windows and not Linux? Usually it's the other way around, or at least I can diagnose better. But I can't find anything.

– Steven Walton
Sep 1 '14 at 7:13





Yeah, it just seems HIGHLY unlikely that the there is a hardware problem on only a certain section of a hdd. And I get the ls error immediately. If opening through dolphin it starts to scan then fails. I can even open the files in windows though. So if it is corrupted, it isn't in that way. Why can I open it in Windows and not Linux? Usually it's the other way around, or at least I can diagnose better. But I can't find anything.

– Steven Walton
Sep 1 '14 at 7:13













What happens if you copy the files, preferably to another disk/SD etc. under Windows and then access those from Linux?

– Anthon
Sep 1 '14 at 7:31





What happens if you copy the files, preferably to another disk/SD etc. under Windows and then access those from Linux?

– Anthon
Sep 1 '14 at 7:31

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f153068%2flinux-cant-read-and-write-but-windows-can%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-arch-linux, ls, mount

Popular posts from this blog

Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god existsWord for having a definite opinion while simultaneously withholding judgment?What's the opposite of “newcomer? Is ”veteran" OK?What do you call an “atheist” who might believe in an afterlife?What's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Word for someone who dismisses contrary opinions as irrational?Somone who thinks they are overly special/out of the ordinaryIs there a word, phrase or idiom for “a person who is incapable of thinking about the future”?The belief that a god is human-likeA word for a non-famous person/thing you have heard a lot aboutAdjective for a person who enjoys taking care of their appearance

What was this official D&D 3.5e Lovecraft-flavored rulebook?What was this set of RPG tools called?As a first-time DM should I let my players play complex character classes and roles?Nymph's Kiss and the RelationshipWhat was the name of this Cleric Prestige Class that shapes metal with its bare hands?Are the 3.5e Dragonlance books third party or official works?What's up with the domain Vile Darkness?What was this 80s book about RPGs?What was the name of this Werewolf band?What book had Rituals to “upgrade” animal companions to keep them viable at higher levels?What was this RPG that had rules for player-owned businesses?

2017 IndyCar Series Contents Series news Teams and drivers Schedule Season summary Footnotes References External links Navigation menu"INDYCAR: Initial 2018 bodywork concepts unveiled"the original"IndyCar confirms switch to Performance Friction brakes in 2017""AJ Foyt Racing will switch to Chevy"the original"Carlos Munoz, Conor Daly will drive for AJ Foyt Racing""Zach Veach's Indy 500 Debut Confirmed with Foyt""No mass exodus from Honda after Ganassi switch""Ex-F1 driver Sato joins Andretti Autosport for 2017 IndyCar season""IndyCar's Ryan Hunter-Reay, sponsor DHL paired through 2020""hhgregg and Andretti Autosport announce partnership for key races in 2016""INDYCAR: Rossi re-signs with Andretti"the original"McLaren Formula 1 - Fernando Alonso to race at Indy 500 with McLaren, Honda and Andretti Autosport""Shank will finally take part in Indy 500 with Harvey, Andretti | MotorSportsTalk""Andretti adds Jack Harvey to Indy 500 field""Ganassi switches to Honda power for 2017""INDYCAR: Chilton returns to Ganassi"the original"IndyCar silly season: Who's going where in 2017?""INDYCAR: Kanaan, NTT Data return to Ganassi"the original"Kimball to remain at Ganassi for 2017""Coyne confirms Bourdais for 2017 IndyCar season""Davison to sub for Bourdais in Indy 500"the original"Gutierrez confirmed for Detroit IndyCar debut""Gutierrez returns with Coyne for rest of 2017 season""Vautier to drive for Coyne at Texas"the original"INDYCAR: Coyne confirms Jones for 2017"the original"Pippa Mann returns to Coyne for Indy 500""Karam, Dreyer & Reinbold teaming up again for Indianapolis 500""Pigot to return to Ed Carpenter Racing""Hildebrand confirmed as full-time Ed Carpenter driver""Veach to replace injured Hildebrand at Barber"the originalNew Team Harding Racing Enters Chaves for 101st Indianapolis 500"Juncos Racing Announces Entry in 101st Running of the Indianapolis 500 :: Juncos Racing""Juncos confirms Pigot for Indy 500""Saavedra confirmed in Juncos' second 500 entry"the original"Lazier confirms Indy 500 run after son's USF2000 debut"the original"Claman DeMelo to race for RLLR at Sonoma"the original"Rahal signs Servia and ace engineer for 2017""IndyCar: Aleshin returns with Schmidt"the original"Aleshin replaced by Saavedra for Toronto""Jack Harvey will pilot SPM No. 7 car at Watkins Glen, Sonoma""Jay Howard confirmed in Tony Stewart's supported SPM Indy entry""INDYCAR: Newgarden to wave the flag at Penske"the original"Pagenaud opts for No. 1 in 2017"the original"Penske confirms Newgarden for 2017""Montoya to stay with Team Penske in 2017""Target leaving IndyCar after 27 seasons with Chip Ganassi""Cavin: IndyCar could see complete driver/team shakeup in 2017""End of the road for KV Racing?""KV Racing confirms closure, equipment sold to Juncos""Juncos confirms IndyCar Series entry"the original"Juncos readies IndyCar program, aims for '17 500"the original"Harding Racing to add Texas, Pocono to schedule"the original"Sato signs with Andretti Autosport for 2017""INDYCAR: Aleshin in Doubt at SPM"the original"Long Beach notebook: JR Hildebrand breaks hand""Hildebrand cleared to return at Phoenix"the original"Bourdais to undergo surgery on multiple fractures""Aleshin loses Schmidt Peterson IndyCar ride""Saavedra in at SPM for Pocono, Gateway"the original"Bourdais to make return at Gateway"the original"The IndyCar Grand Prix no longer is sponsored by Angie's List""2017 IndyCar Series rulebook""2017 Verizon IndyCar Series Official Rulebook"Official websiteeeeee