Why doesn't a hydraulic lever violate conservation of energy? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How is energy transferred from one incompressible fluid to another?Pascal's Principle and hydraulic liftMicroscopic source of pressure in an incompressible fluidIs work done on a fluid in a communicating vessel necessarily equal to work done by the fluid inside it?Force amplification and Newton's third lawEnergy paradox in fluid mechanicsAircraft lift theory vs energy conservationConfusion about Conservation of energyWhy the excess pressures are equated in hydraulic press?Why Pascal's Law is true and what is the mechanism for force amplification at molecular level?

does high air pressure throw off wheel balance?

How did the audience guess the pentatonic scale in Bobby McFerrin's presentation?

How many people can fit inside Mordenkainen's Magnificent Mansion?

Change bounding box of math glyphs in LuaTeX

Scientific Reports - Significant Figures

How does ice melt when immersed in water?

Can smartphones with the same camera sensor have different image quality?

Can a 1st-level character have an ability score above 18?

Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?

Semisimplicity of the category of coherent sheaves?

I could not break this equation. Please help me

Take groceries in checked luggage

How to delete random line from file using Unix command?

Why does the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) not include telescopes from Africa, Asia or Australia?

Why's the Graph of this Function so Wonky?

Do warforged have souls?

How do I add random spotting to the same face in cycles?

How is simplicity better than precision and clarity in prose?

Who or what is the being for whom Being is a question for Heidegger?

University's motivation for having tenure-track positions

Create an outline of font

Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?

Can a novice safely splice in wire to lengthen 5V charging cable?

Does Parliament hold absolute power in the UK?



Why doesn't a hydraulic lever violate conservation of energy?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How is energy transferred from one incompressible fluid to another?Pascal's Principle and hydraulic liftMicroscopic source of pressure in an incompressible fluidIs work done on a fluid in a communicating vessel necessarily equal to work done by the fluid inside it?Force amplification and Newton's third lawEnergy paradox in fluid mechanicsAircraft lift theory vs energy conservationConfusion about Conservation of energyWhy the excess pressures are equated in hydraulic press?Why Pascal's Law is true and what is the mechanism for force amplification at molecular level?










5












$begingroup$


Suppose I apply some force on one side of Hydraulic lift where area is less, and the fluid in the lift raises some heavier object on the other side where area is more, Now work done is $Forcetimes displacement$ and displacement on both side is same (incompressible liquid) but force on one side is less, so we get more energy on other side. Then why doesn't the law of Conservation of energy fail here.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 18




    $begingroup$
    Your statement “displacement on both sides is same” is incorrect.
    $endgroup$
    – Farcher
    yesterday






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    do you think the levers also violate energy conservation?
    $endgroup$
    – user8718165
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    displacement means "volume", right?
    $endgroup$
    – JEB
    yesterday






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    @JEB hits the point. Displacement here means a distance moved and not the volume displaced.
    $endgroup$
    – JimmyB
    yesterday















5












$begingroup$


Suppose I apply some force on one side of Hydraulic lift where area is less, and the fluid in the lift raises some heavier object on the other side where area is more, Now work done is $Forcetimes displacement$ and displacement on both side is same (incompressible liquid) but force on one side is less, so we get more energy on other side. Then why doesn't the law of Conservation of energy fail here.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 18




    $begingroup$
    Your statement “displacement on both sides is same” is incorrect.
    $endgroup$
    – Farcher
    yesterday






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    do you think the levers also violate energy conservation?
    $endgroup$
    – user8718165
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    displacement means "volume", right?
    $endgroup$
    – JEB
    yesterday






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    @JEB hits the point. Displacement here means a distance moved and not the volume displaced.
    $endgroup$
    – JimmyB
    yesterday













5












5








5





$begingroup$


Suppose I apply some force on one side of Hydraulic lift where area is less, and the fluid in the lift raises some heavier object on the other side where area is more, Now work done is $Forcetimes displacement$ and displacement on both side is same (incompressible liquid) but force on one side is less, so we get more energy on other side. Then why doesn't the law of Conservation of energy fail here.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Suppose I apply some force on one side of Hydraulic lift where area is less, and the fluid in the lift raises some heavier object on the other side where area is more, Now work done is $Forcetimes displacement$ and displacement on both side is same (incompressible liquid) but force on one side is less, so we get more energy on other side. Then why doesn't the law of Conservation of energy fail here.







newtonian-mechanics fluid-dynamics pressure energy-conservation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday









knzhou

47k11127226




47k11127226










asked yesterday









Sawan KumawatSawan Kumawat

485




485







  • 18




    $begingroup$
    Your statement “displacement on both sides is same” is incorrect.
    $endgroup$
    – Farcher
    yesterday






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    do you think the levers also violate energy conservation?
    $endgroup$
    – user8718165
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    displacement means "volume", right?
    $endgroup$
    – JEB
    yesterday






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    @JEB hits the point. Displacement here means a distance moved and not the volume displaced.
    $endgroup$
    – JimmyB
    yesterday












  • 18




    $begingroup$
    Your statement “displacement on both sides is same” is incorrect.
    $endgroup$
    – Farcher
    yesterday






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    do you think the levers also violate energy conservation?
    $endgroup$
    – user8718165
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    displacement means "volume", right?
    $endgroup$
    – JEB
    yesterday






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    @JEB hits the point. Displacement here means a distance moved and not the volume displaced.
    $endgroup$
    – JimmyB
    yesterday







18




18




$begingroup$
Your statement “displacement on both sides is same” is incorrect.
$endgroup$
– Farcher
yesterday




$begingroup$
Your statement “displacement on both sides is same” is incorrect.
$endgroup$
– Farcher
yesterday




3




3




$begingroup$
do you think the levers also violate energy conservation?
$endgroup$
– user8718165
yesterday




$begingroup$
do you think the levers also violate energy conservation?
$endgroup$
– user8718165
yesterday




2




2




$begingroup$
displacement means "volume", right?
$endgroup$
– JEB
yesterday




$begingroup$
displacement means "volume", right?
$endgroup$
– JEB
yesterday




7




7




$begingroup$
@JEB hits the point. Displacement here means a distance moved and not the volume displaced.
$endgroup$
– JimmyB
yesterday




$begingroup$
@JEB hits the point. Displacement here means a distance moved and not the volume displaced.
$endgroup$
– JimmyB
yesterday










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

The displacement produced is not the same. That is why, energy is conserved.



When you apply force on one side of the opening (with smaller $A$, i.e. $A_1$), the displacement in the piston that does the work on the water is say, $x$. The displacement on the other side of the lift with $A_2$ where $A_2>A_1$, has a displacement smaller than $x$, which we'll call $y$.



What happens here is that the water absorbs energy from the piston and sends it straight to the lift on the other end with area $A_2$. The volume of water remains the same. But the displacements need not be the same.



Consider the work done $W=PDelta V$ where $Delta V$ is the change in volume. Since the first and the second openings are subjected to the same pressure (from the piston to the water, and from something that lifts the object in the larger opening), $Delta V=A_1x = A_2y$.



$$y=fracA_1xA_2$$



Since, $A_2 >A_1$, clearly, $y<x$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    28












    $begingroup$

    enter image description here
    Displacement in both sides is not same. If on one side of lift the area is $A_1$, and on other side it is $A_2$, and we apply a force $F_1$ on one side to distance $d_1$ then volume decreased in one side is $=A_1 times d_1$



    Equal amount of volume will raise in the other side.



    So $$A_1 times d_1=A_2 times d_2$$



    $A_1 not= A_2$, so $d_1 not=d_2$.



    Actually, we need to apply the little force $F_1$ for a greater distance $d_1$.






    share|cite|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Broly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$













      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "151"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472256%2fwhy-doesnt-a-hydraulic-lever-violate-conservation-of-energy%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      6












      $begingroup$

      The displacement produced is not the same. That is why, energy is conserved.



      When you apply force on one side of the opening (with smaller $A$, i.e. $A_1$), the displacement in the piston that does the work on the water is say, $x$. The displacement on the other side of the lift with $A_2$ where $A_2>A_1$, has a displacement smaller than $x$, which we'll call $y$.



      What happens here is that the water absorbs energy from the piston and sends it straight to the lift on the other end with area $A_2$. The volume of water remains the same. But the displacements need not be the same.



      Consider the work done $W=PDelta V$ where $Delta V$ is the change in volume. Since the first and the second openings are subjected to the same pressure (from the piston to the water, and from something that lifts the object in the larger opening), $Delta V=A_1x = A_2y$.



      $$y=fracA_1xA_2$$



      Since, $A_2 >A_1$, clearly, $y<x$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        6












        $begingroup$

        The displacement produced is not the same. That is why, energy is conserved.



        When you apply force on one side of the opening (with smaller $A$, i.e. $A_1$), the displacement in the piston that does the work on the water is say, $x$. The displacement on the other side of the lift with $A_2$ where $A_2>A_1$, has a displacement smaller than $x$, which we'll call $y$.



        What happens here is that the water absorbs energy from the piston and sends it straight to the lift on the other end with area $A_2$. The volume of water remains the same. But the displacements need not be the same.



        Consider the work done $W=PDelta V$ where $Delta V$ is the change in volume. Since the first and the second openings are subjected to the same pressure (from the piston to the water, and from something that lifts the object in the larger opening), $Delta V=A_1x = A_2y$.



        $$y=fracA_1xA_2$$



        Since, $A_2 >A_1$, clearly, $y<x$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          6












          6








          6





          $begingroup$

          The displacement produced is not the same. That is why, energy is conserved.



          When you apply force on one side of the opening (with smaller $A$, i.e. $A_1$), the displacement in the piston that does the work on the water is say, $x$. The displacement on the other side of the lift with $A_2$ where $A_2>A_1$, has a displacement smaller than $x$, which we'll call $y$.



          What happens here is that the water absorbs energy from the piston and sends it straight to the lift on the other end with area $A_2$. The volume of water remains the same. But the displacements need not be the same.



          Consider the work done $W=PDelta V$ where $Delta V$ is the change in volume. Since the first and the second openings are subjected to the same pressure (from the piston to the water, and from something that lifts the object in the larger opening), $Delta V=A_1x = A_2y$.



          $$y=fracA_1xA_2$$



          Since, $A_2 >A_1$, clearly, $y<x$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The displacement produced is not the same. That is why, energy is conserved.



          When you apply force on one side of the opening (with smaller $A$, i.e. $A_1$), the displacement in the piston that does the work on the water is say, $x$. The displacement on the other side of the lift with $A_2$ where $A_2>A_1$, has a displacement smaller than $x$, which we'll call $y$.



          What happens here is that the water absorbs energy from the piston and sends it straight to the lift on the other end with area $A_2$. The volume of water remains the same. But the displacements need not be the same.



          Consider the work done $W=PDelta V$ where $Delta V$ is the change in volume. Since the first and the second openings are subjected to the same pressure (from the piston to the water, and from something that lifts the object in the larger opening), $Delta V=A_1x = A_2y$.



          $$y=fracA_1xA_2$$



          Since, $A_2 >A_1$, clearly, $y<x$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          KV18KV18

          1,053516




          1,053516





















              28












              $begingroup$

              enter image description here
              Displacement in both sides is not same. If on one side of lift the area is $A_1$, and on other side it is $A_2$, and we apply a force $F_1$ on one side to distance $d_1$ then volume decreased in one side is $=A_1 times d_1$



              Equal amount of volume will raise in the other side.



              So $$A_1 times d_1=A_2 times d_2$$



              $A_1 not= A_2$, so $d_1 not=d_2$.



              Actually, we need to apply the little force $F_1$ for a greater distance $d_1$.






              share|cite|improve this answer










              New contributor




              Broly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              $endgroup$

















                28












                $begingroup$

                enter image description here
                Displacement in both sides is not same. If on one side of lift the area is $A_1$, and on other side it is $A_2$, and we apply a force $F_1$ on one side to distance $d_1$ then volume decreased in one side is $=A_1 times d_1$



                Equal amount of volume will raise in the other side.



                So $$A_1 times d_1=A_2 times d_2$$



                $A_1 not= A_2$, so $d_1 not=d_2$.



                Actually, we need to apply the little force $F_1$ for a greater distance $d_1$.






                share|cite|improve this answer










                New contributor




                Broly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                $endgroup$















                  28












                  28








                  28





                  $begingroup$

                  enter image description here
                  Displacement in both sides is not same. If on one side of lift the area is $A_1$, and on other side it is $A_2$, and we apply a force $F_1$ on one side to distance $d_1$ then volume decreased in one side is $=A_1 times d_1$



                  Equal amount of volume will raise in the other side.



                  So $$A_1 times d_1=A_2 times d_2$$



                  $A_1 not= A_2$, so $d_1 not=d_2$.



                  Actually, we need to apply the little force $F_1$ for a greater distance $d_1$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  New contributor




                  Broly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  $endgroup$



                  enter image description here
                  Displacement in both sides is not same. If on one side of lift the area is $A_1$, and on other side it is $A_2$, and we apply a force $F_1$ on one side to distance $d_1$ then volume decreased in one side is $=A_1 times d_1$



                  Equal amount of volume will raise in the other side.



                  So $$A_1 times d_1=A_2 times d_2$$



                  $A_1 not= A_2$, so $d_1 not=d_2$.



                  Actually, we need to apply the little force $F_1$ for a greater distance $d_1$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  New contributor




                  Broly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited yesterday









                  MarianD

                  258128




                  258128






                  New contributor




                  Broly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered yesterday









                  BrolyBroly

                  476214




                  476214




                  New contributor




                  Broly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  Broly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  Broly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472256%2fwhy-doesnt-a-hydraulic-lever-violate-conservation-of-energy%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -energy-conservation, fluid-dynamics, newtonian-mechanics, pressure

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god existsWord for having a definite opinion while simultaneously withholding judgment?What's the opposite of “newcomer? Is ”veteran" OK?What do you call an “atheist” who might believe in an afterlife?What's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Word for someone who dismisses contrary opinions as irrational?Somone who thinks they are overly special/out of the ordinaryIs there a word, phrase or idiom for “a person who is incapable of thinking about the future”?The belief that a god is human-likeA word for a non-famous person/thing you have heard a lot aboutAdjective for a person who enjoys taking care of their appearance

                      What was this official D&D 3.5e Lovecraft-flavored rulebook?What was this set of RPG tools called?As a first-time DM should I let my players play complex character classes and roles?Nymph's Kiss and the RelationshipWhat was the name of this Cleric Prestige Class that shapes metal with its bare hands?Are the 3.5e Dragonlance books third party or official works?What's up with the domain Vile Darkness?What was this 80s book about RPGs?What was the name of this Werewolf band?What book had Rituals to “upgrade” animal companions to keep them viable at higher levels?What was this RPG that had rules for player-owned businesses?

                      2017 IndyCar Series Contents Series news Teams and drivers Schedule Season summary Footnotes References External links Navigation menu"INDYCAR: Initial 2018 bodywork concepts unveiled"the original"IndyCar confirms switch to Performance Friction brakes in 2017""AJ Foyt Racing will switch to Chevy"the original"Carlos Munoz, Conor Daly will drive for AJ Foyt Racing""Zach Veach's Indy 500 Debut Confirmed with Foyt""No mass exodus from Honda after Ganassi switch""Ex-F1 driver Sato joins Andretti Autosport for 2017 IndyCar season""IndyCar's Ryan Hunter-Reay, sponsor DHL paired through 2020""hhgregg and Andretti Autosport announce partnership for key races in 2016""INDYCAR: Rossi re-signs with Andretti"the original"McLaren Formula 1 - Fernando Alonso to race at Indy 500 with McLaren, Honda and Andretti Autosport""Shank will finally take part in Indy 500 with Harvey, Andretti | MotorSportsTalk""Andretti adds Jack Harvey to Indy 500 field""Ganassi switches to Honda power for 2017""INDYCAR: Chilton returns to Ganassi"the original"IndyCar silly season: Who's going where in 2017?""INDYCAR: Kanaan, NTT Data return to Ganassi"the original"Kimball to remain at Ganassi for 2017""Coyne confirms Bourdais for 2017 IndyCar season""Davison to sub for Bourdais in Indy 500"the original"Gutierrez confirmed for Detroit IndyCar debut""Gutierrez returns with Coyne for rest of 2017 season""Vautier to drive for Coyne at Texas"the original"INDYCAR: Coyne confirms Jones for 2017"the original"Pippa Mann returns to Coyne for Indy 500""Karam, Dreyer & Reinbold teaming up again for Indianapolis 500""Pigot to return to Ed Carpenter Racing""Hildebrand confirmed as full-time Ed Carpenter driver""Veach to replace injured Hildebrand at Barber"the originalNew Team Harding Racing Enters Chaves for 101st Indianapolis 500"Juncos Racing Announces Entry in 101st Running of the Indianapolis 500 :: Juncos Racing""Juncos confirms Pigot for Indy 500""Saavedra confirmed in Juncos' second 500 entry"the original"Lazier confirms Indy 500 run after son's USF2000 debut"the original"Claman DeMelo to race for RLLR at Sonoma"the original"Rahal signs Servia and ace engineer for 2017""IndyCar: Aleshin returns with Schmidt"the original"Aleshin replaced by Saavedra for Toronto""Jack Harvey will pilot SPM No. 7 car at Watkins Glen, Sonoma""Jay Howard confirmed in Tony Stewart's supported SPM Indy entry""INDYCAR: Newgarden to wave the flag at Penske"the original"Pagenaud opts for No. 1 in 2017"the original"Penske confirms Newgarden for 2017""Montoya to stay with Team Penske in 2017""Target leaving IndyCar after 27 seasons with Chip Ganassi""Cavin: IndyCar could see complete driver/team shakeup in 2017""End of the road for KV Racing?""KV Racing confirms closure, equipment sold to Juncos""Juncos confirms IndyCar Series entry"the original"Juncos readies IndyCar program, aims for '17 500"the original"Harding Racing to add Texas, Pocono to schedule"the original"Sato signs with Andretti Autosport for 2017""INDYCAR: Aleshin in Doubt at SPM"the original"Long Beach notebook: JR Hildebrand breaks hand""Hildebrand cleared to return at Phoenix"the original"Bourdais to undergo surgery on multiple fractures""Aleshin loses Schmidt Peterson IndyCar ride""Saavedra in at SPM for Pocono, Gateway"the original"Bourdais to make return at Gateway"the original"The IndyCar Grand Prix no longer is sponsored by Angie's List""2017 IndyCar Series rulebook""2017 Verizon IndyCar Series Official Rulebook"Official websiteeeeee