How to create a folder symlink that has a different name? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsDynamic Symlinksunderstand the designation of symbolic linksSymlink all files in a directory with the entire directory treeSymlink aliasing files in subdirectories without changing current directoryCreate symlink tree in existing directoriesSymlink and folder permissionsWhat idempotent command can I use to make a symlink pointing to a directory?How to chdir to symlink source and not target in .screenrcHow to have tar follow all symlinks except one recursive symlinkHow to create a custom command or shortcut/symlink to run the standalone program?

Am I ethically obligated to go into work on an off day if the reason is sudden?

Can the prologue be the backstory of your main character?

Does Parliament hold absolute power in the UK?

How can I define good in a religion that claims no moral authority?

How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time

University's motivation for having tenure-track positions

Typeface like Times New Roman but with "tied" percent sign

How can I protect witches in combat who wear limited clothing?

How to copy the contents of all files with a certain name into a new file?

how can a perfect fourth interval be considered either consonant or dissonant?

How does this infinite series simplify to an integral?

Is this wall load bearing? Blueprints and photos attached

How is simplicity better than precision and clarity in prose?

Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?

How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?

How to split my screen on my Macbook Air?

Segmentation fault output is suppressed when piping stdin into a function. Why?

Working through the single responsibility principle (SRP) in Python when calls are expensive

Why is superheterodyning better than direct conversion?

How to test the equality of two Pearson correlation coefficients computed from the same sample?

Can a novice safely splice in wire to lengthen 5V charging cable?

Relations between two reciprocal partial derivatives?

He got a vote 80% that of Emmanuel Macron’s

Sort a list of pairs representing an acyclic, partial automorphism



How to create a folder symlink that has a different name?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsDynamic Symlinksunderstand the designation of symbolic linksSymlink all files in a directory with the entire directory treeSymlink aliasing files in subdirectories without changing current directoryCreate symlink tree in existing directoriesSymlink and folder permissionsWhat idempotent command can I use to make a symlink pointing to a directory?How to chdir to symlink source and not target in .screenrcHow to have tar follow all symlinks except one recursive symlinkHow to create a custom command or shortcut/symlink to run the standalone program?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















I want to create a symlink



~/.pm2/logs -> /opt/myapp/log


When I run



ln -sFf /opt/myapp/log ~/.pm2/logs


I get a symlink



~/.pm2/logs/log -> /opt/myapp/log


which is not what I want.



I'd prefer a POSIX-compatible solution if possible.










share|improve this question









New contributor




ptkvsk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


























    2















    I want to create a symlink



    ~/.pm2/logs -> /opt/myapp/log


    When I run



    ln -sFf /opt/myapp/log ~/.pm2/logs


    I get a symlink



    ~/.pm2/logs/log -> /opt/myapp/log


    which is not what I want.



    I'd prefer a POSIX-compatible solution if possible.










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    ptkvsk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      2












      2








      2


      1






      I want to create a symlink



      ~/.pm2/logs -> /opt/myapp/log


      When I run



      ln -sFf /opt/myapp/log ~/.pm2/logs


      I get a symlink



      ~/.pm2/logs/log -> /opt/myapp/log


      which is not what I want.



      I'd prefer a POSIX-compatible solution if possible.










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      ptkvsk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      I want to create a symlink



      ~/.pm2/logs -> /opt/myapp/log


      When I run



      ln -sFf /opt/myapp/log ~/.pm2/logs


      I get a symlink



      ~/.pm2/logs/log -> /opt/myapp/log


      which is not what I want.



      I'd prefer a POSIX-compatible solution if possible.







      symlink ln






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      ptkvsk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      ptkvsk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited yesterday









      Kusalananda

      141k18263439




      141k18263439






      New contributor




      ptkvsk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked yesterday









      ptkvskptkvsk

      1112




      1112




      New contributor




      ptkvsk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      ptkvsk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      ptkvsk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          You already have a directory at ~/.pm2/logs. Since that directory exists, the symbolic link is put inside it.



          Would you want that ~/.pm2/logs is a symbolic link rather than a directory, then you will have to remove or rename that existing directory first.






          share|improve this answer























          • I thought "-Ff" flags are specifically made to replace target directory so I don't have to remove it manually. Am I wrong?

            – ptkvsk
            yesterday







          • 1





            @ptkvsk The -F flag does something completely different and is not a POSIX option. The -f flag would not unlink a directory. The standard specifies that if the target (the last operand) is a directory, then the link will be place inside it. The -f option does not change this behaviour.

            – Kusalananda
            yesterday











          • Those flags likely only work with hard links, as well. With symbolic links it doesn't matter what the Target is, a file or a directory. to hard links it does matter.

            – 0xSheepdog
            yesterday



















          1














          Remove the ~/.pm2/logs directory first, because your target is an existing directory, the link is created inside it.






          share|improve this answer






























            1














            As other answers say, there is already a directory there.



            To avoid this and instead get an error-message, use the -T option, unfortunately I don't think this is Posix (it is GNU).



            From the Gnu ln manual (same for cp and mv).



             ln [OPTION]... [-T] TARGET LINK_NAME (1st form)
            ln [OPTION]... TARGET (2nd form)
            ln [OPTION]... TARGET... DIRECTORY (3rd form)
            ln [OPTION]... -t DIRECTORY TARGET... (4th form)


            Note form 1 without the -T is ambiguous with form 3 (both have two arguments).



            In Posix you can force this non-ambiguity by putting a / at the end of a directory name, in form 3, but I don't think there is any thing you can do the other way around. This is why Gnu added the -T option.






            share|improve this answer























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "106"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );






              ptkvsk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f512139%2fhow-to-create-a-folder-symlink-that-has-a-different-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              4














              You already have a directory at ~/.pm2/logs. Since that directory exists, the symbolic link is put inside it.



              Would you want that ~/.pm2/logs is a symbolic link rather than a directory, then you will have to remove or rename that existing directory first.






              share|improve this answer























              • I thought "-Ff" flags are specifically made to replace target directory so I don't have to remove it manually. Am I wrong?

                – ptkvsk
                yesterday







              • 1





                @ptkvsk The -F flag does something completely different and is not a POSIX option. The -f flag would not unlink a directory. The standard specifies that if the target (the last operand) is a directory, then the link will be place inside it. The -f option does not change this behaviour.

                – Kusalananda
                yesterday











              • Those flags likely only work with hard links, as well. With symbolic links it doesn't matter what the Target is, a file or a directory. to hard links it does matter.

                – 0xSheepdog
                yesterday
















              4














              You already have a directory at ~/.pm2/logs. Since that directory exists, the symbolic link is put inside it.



              Would you want that ~/.pm2/logs is a symbolic link rather than a directory, then you will have to remove or rename that existing directory first.






              share|improve this answer























              • I thought "-Ff" flags are specifically made to replace target directory so I don't have to remove it manually. Am I wrong?

                – ptkvsk
                yesterday







              • 1





                @ptkvsk The -F flag does something completely different and is not a POSIX option. The -f flag would not unlink a directory. The standard specifies that if the target (the last operand) is a directory, then the link will be place inside it. The -f option does not change this behaviour.

                – Kusalananda
                yesterday











              • Those flags likely only work with hard links, as well. With symbolic links it doesn't matter what the Target is, a file or a directory. to hard links it does matter.

                – 0xSheepdog
                yesterday














              4












              4








              4







              You already have a directory at ~/.pm2/logs. Since that directory exists, the symbolic link is put inside it.



              Would you want that ~/.pm2/logs is a symbolic link rather than a directory, then you will have to remove or rename that existing directory first.






              share|improve this answer













              You already have a directory at ~/.pm2/logs. Since that directory exists, the symbolic link is put inside it.



              Would you want that ~/.pm2/logs is a symbolic link rather than a directory, then you will have to remove or rename that existing directory first.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered yesterday









              KusalanandaKusalananda

              141k18263439




              141k18263439












              • I thought "-Ff" flags are specifically made to replace target directory so I don't have to remove it manually. Am I wrong?

                – ptkvsk
                yesterday







              • 1





                @ptkvsk The -F flag does something completely different and is not a POSIX option. The -f flag would not unlink a directory. The standard specifies that if the target (the last operand) is a directory, then the link will be place inside it. The -f option does not change this behaviour.

                – Kusalananda
                yesterday











              • Those flags likely only work with hard links, as well. With symbolic links it doesn't matter what the Target is, a file or a directory. to hard links it does matter.

                – 0xSheepdog
                yesterday


















              • I thought "-Ff" flags are specifically made to replace target directory so I don't have to remove it manually. Am I wrong?

                – ptkvsk
                yesterday







              • 1





                @ptkvsk The -F flag does something completely different and is not a POSIX option. The -f flag would not unlink a directory. The standard specifies that if the target (the last operand) is a directory, then the link will be place inside it. The -f option does not change this behaviour.

                – Kusalananda
                yesterday











              • Those flags likely only work with hard links, as well. With symbolic links it doesn't matter what the Target is, a file or a directory. to hard links it does matter.

                – 0xSheepdog
                yesterday

















              I thought "-Ff" flags are specifically made to replace target directory so I don't have to remove it manually. Am I wrong?

              – ptkvsk
              yesterday






              I thought "-Ff" flags are specifically made to replace target directory so I don't have to remove it manually. Am I wrong?

              – ptkvsk
              yesterday





              1




              1





              @ptkvsk The -F flag does something completely different and is not a POSIX option. The -f flag would not unlink a directory. The standard specifies that if the target (the last operand) is a directory, then the link will be place inside it. The -f option does not change this behaviour.

              – Kusalananda
              yesterday





              @ptkvsk The -F flag does something completely different and is not a POSIX option. The -f flag would not unlink a directory. The standard specifies that if the target (the last operand) is a directory, then the link will be place inside it. The -f option does not change this behaviour.

              – Kusalananda
              yesterday













              Those flags likely only work with hard links, as well. With symbolic links it doesn't matter what the Target is, a file or a directory. to hard links it does matter.

              – 0xSheepdog
              yesterday






              Those flags likely only work with hard links, as well. With symbolic links it doesn't matter what the Target is, a file or a directory. to hard links it does matter.

              – 0xSheepdog
              yesterday














              1














              Remove the ~/.pm2/logs directory first, because your target is an existing directory, the link is created inside it.






              share|improve this answer



























                1














                Remove the ~/.pm2/logs directory first, because your target is an existing directory, the link is created inside it.






                share|improve this answer

























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  Remove the ~/.pm2/logs directory first, because your target is an existing directory, the link is created inside it.






                  share|improve this answer













                  Remove the ~/.pm2/logs directory first, because your target is an existing directory, the link is created inside it.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered yesterday









                  XrXcaXrXca

                  813




                  813





















                      1














                      As other answers say, there is already a directory there.



                      To avoid this and instead get an error-message, use the -T option, unfortunately I don't think this is Posix (it is GNU).



                      From the Gnu ln manual (same for cp and mv).



                       ln [OPTION]... [-T] TARGET LINK_NAME (1st form)
                      ln [OPTION]... TARGET (2nd form)
                      ln [OPTION]... TARGET... DIRECTORY (3rd form)
                      ln [OPTION]... -t DIRECTORY TARGET... (4th form)


                      Note form 1 without the -T is ambiguous with form 3 (both have two arguments).



                      In Posix you can force this non-ambiguity by putting a / at the end of a directory name, in form 3, but I don't think there is any thing you can do the other way around. This is why Gnu added the -T option.






                      share|improve this answer



























                        1














                        As other answers say, there is already a directory there.



                        To avoid this and instead get an error-message, use the -T option, unfortunately I don't think this is Posix (it is GNU).



                        From the Gnu ln manual (same for cp and mv).



                         ln [OPTION]... [-T] TARGET LINK_NAME (1st form)
                        ln [OPTION]... TARGET (2nd form)
                        ln [OPTION]... TARGET... DIRECTORY (3rd form)
                        ln [OPTION]... -t DIRECTORY TARGET... (4th form)


                        Note form 1 without the -T is ambiguous with form 3 (both have two arguments).



                        In Posix you can force this non-ambiguity by putting a / at the end of a directory name, in form 3, but I don't think there is any thing you can do the other way around. This is why Gnu added the -T option.






                        share|improve this answer

























                          1












                          1








                          1







                          As other answers say, there is already a directory there.



                          To avoid this and instead get an error-message, use the -T option, unfortunately I don't think this is Posix (it is GNU).



                          From the Gnu ln manual (same for cp and mv).



                           ln [OPTION]... [-T] TARGET LINK_NAME (1st form)
                          ln [OPTION]... TARGET (2nd form)
                          ln [OPTION]... TARGET... DIRECTORY (3rd form)
                          ln [OPTION]... -t DIRECTORY TARGET... (4th form)


                          Note form 1 without the -T is ambiguous with form 3 (both have two arguments).



                          In Posix you can force this non-ambiguity by putting a / at the end of a directory name, in form 3, but I don't think there is any thing you can do the other way around. This is why Gnu added the -T option.






                          share|improve this answer













                          As other answers say, there is already a directory there.



                          To avoid this and instead get an error-message, use the -T option, unfortunately I don't think this is Posix (it is GNU).



                          From the Gnu ln manual (same for cp and mv).



                           ln [OPTION]... [-T] TARGET LINK_NAME (1st form)
                          ln [OPTION]... TARGET (2nd form)
                          ln [OPTION]... TARGET... DIRECTORY (3rd form)
                          ln [OPTION]... -t DIRECTORY TARGET... (4th form)


                          Note form 1 without the -T is ambiguous with form 3 (both have two arguments).



                          In Posix you can force this non-ambiguity by putting a / at the end of a directory name, in form 3, but I don't think there is any thing you can do the other way around. This is why Gnu added the -T option.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered yesterday









                          ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor

                          12.5k52662




                          12.5k52662




















                              ptkvsk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                              draft saved

                              draft discarded


















                              ptkvsk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                              ptkvsk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                              ptkvsk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f512139%2fhow-to-create-a-folder-symlink-that-has-a-different-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              -ln, symlink

                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god existsWord for having a definite opinion while simultaneously withholding judgment?What's the opposite of “newcomer? Is ”veteran" OK?What do you call an “atheist” who might believe in an afterlife?What's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Word for someone who dismisses contrary opinions as irrational?Somone who thinks they are overly special/out of the ordinaryIs there a word, phrase or idiom for “a person who is incapable of thinking about the future”?The belief that a god is human-likeA word for a non-famous person/thing you have heard a lot aboutAdjective for a person who enjoys taking care of their appearance

                              What was this official D&D 3.5e Lovecraft-flavored rulebook?What was this set of RPG tools called?As a first-time DM should I let my players play complex character classes and roles?Nymph's Kiss and the RelationshipWhat was the name of this Cleric Prestige Class that shapes metal with its bare hands?Are the 3.5e Dragonlance books third party or official works?What's up with the domain Vile Darkness?What was this 80s book about RPGs?What was the name of this Werewolf band?What book had Rituals to “upgrade” animal companions to keep them viable at higher levels?What was this RPG that had rules for player-owned businesses?

                              2017 IndyCar Series Contents Series news Teams and drivers Schedule Season summary Footnotes References External links Navigation menu"INDYCAR: Initial 2018 bodywork concepts unveiled"the original"IndyCar confirms switch to Performance Friction brakes in 2017""AJ Foyt Racing will switch to Chevy"the original"Carlos Munoz, Conor Daly will drive for AJ Foyt Racing""Zach Veach's Indy 500 Debut Confirmed with Foyt""No mass exodus from Honda after Ganassi switch""Ex-F1 driver Sato joins Andretti Autosport for 2017 IndyCar season""IndyCar's Ryan Hunter-Reay, sponsor DHL paired through 2020""hhgregg and Andretti Autosport announce partnership for key races in 2016""INDYCAR: Rossi re-signs with Andretti"the original"McLaren Formula 1 - Fernando Alonso to race at Indy 500 with McLaren, Honda and Andretti Autosport""Shank will finally take part in Indy 500 with Harvey, Andretti | MotorSportsTalk""Andretti adds Jack Harvey to Indy 500 field""Ganassi switches to Honda power for 2017""INDYCAR: Chilton returns to Ganassi"the original"IndyCar silly season: Who's going where in 2017?""INDYCAR: Kanaan, NTT Data return to Ganassi"the original"Kimball to remain at Ganassi for 2017""Coyne confirms Bourdais for 2017 IndyCar season""Davison to sub for Bourdais in Indy 500"the original"Gutierrez confirmed for Detroit IndyCar debut""Gutierrez returns with Coyne for rest of 2017 season""Vautier to drive for Coyne at Texas"the original"INDYCAR: Coyne confirms Jones for 2017"the original"Pippa Mann returns to Coyne for Indy 500""Karam, Dreyer & Reinbold teaming up again for Indianapolis 500""Pigot to return to Ed Carpenter Racing""Hildebrand confirmed as full-time Ed Carpenter driver""Veach to replace injured Hildebrand at Barber"the originalNew Team Harding Racing Enters Chaves for 101st Indianapolis 500"Juncos Racing Announces Entry in 101st Running of the Indianapolis 500 :: Juncos Racing""Juncos confirms Pigot for Indy 500""Saavedra confirmed in Juncos' second 500 entry"the original"Lazier confirms Indy 500 run after son's USF2000 debut"the original"Claman DeMelo to race for RLLR at Sonoma"the original"Rahal signs Servia and ace engineer for 2017""IndyCar: Aleshin returns with Schmidt"the original"Aleshin replaced by Saavedra for Toronto""Jack Harvey will pilot SPM No. 7 car at Watkins Glen, Sonoma""Jay Howard confirmed in Tony Stewart's supported SPM Indy entry""INDYCAR: Newgarden to wave the flag at Penske"the original"Pagenaud opts for No. 1 in 2017"the original"Penske confirms Newgarden for 2017""Montoya to stay with Team Penske in 2017""Target leaving IndyCar after 27 seasons with Chip Ganassi""Cavin: IndyCar could see complete driver/team shakeup in 2017""End of the road for KV Racing?""KV Racing confirms closure, equipment sold to Juncos""Juncos confirms IndyCar Series entry"the original"Juncos readies IndyCar program, aims for '17 500"the original"Harding Racing to add Texas, Pocono to schedule"the original"Sato signs with Andretti Autosport for 2017""INDYCAR: Aleshin in Doubt at SPM"the original"Long Beach notebook: JR Hildebrand breaks hand""Hildebrand cleared to return at Phoenix"the original"Bourdais to undergo surgery on multiple fractures""Aleshin loses Schmidt Peterson IndyCar ride""Saavedra in at SPM for Pocono, Gateway"the original"Bourdais to make return at Gateway"the original"The IndyCar Grand Prix no longer is sponsored by Angie's List""2017 IndyCar Series rulebook""2017 Verizon IndyCar Series Official Rulebook"Official websiteeeeee