Quantum Toffoli gate equation The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Does quantum control allow to implement any gate?Obtaining gate $e^-iDelta t Z$ from elementary gatesExplicit Conversion Between Universal Gate SetsUnderstanding the Group Leaders Optimization AlgorithmMatrix representation and CX gateComposing the CNOT gate as a tensor product of two level matricesRewrite circuit with measurements with unitariesHow to understand the operators for watermarking schemes?Implementing these $N×N$ matrices on $log N$ qubitsCalculating entries of unitary transformation

Semisimplicity of the category of coherent sheaves?

How are presidential pardons supposed to be used?

Am I ethically obligated to go into work on an off day if the reason is sudden?

Relations between two reciprocal partial derivatives?

What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?

Why can't wing-mounted spoilers be used to steepen approaches?

Does Parliament need to approve the new Brexit delay to 31 October 2019?

Create an outline of font

Can a 1st-level character have an ability score above 18?

The variadic template constructor of my class cannot modify my class members, why is that so?

Sort a list of pairs representing an acyclic, partial automorphism

When did F become S in typeography, and why?

How to pronounce 1ターン?

Wall plug outlet change

How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time

Derivation tree not rendering

Take groceries in checked luggage

Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?

Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?

Working through the single responsibility principle (SRP) in Python when calls are expensive

Didn't get enough time to take a Coding Test - what to do now?

Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?

What aspect of planet Earth must be changed to prevent the industrial revolution?

Is this wall load bearing? Blueprints and photos attached



Quantum Toffoli gate equation



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Does quantum control allow to implement any gate?Obtaining gate $e^-iDelta t Z$ from elementary gatesExplicit Conversion Between Universal Gate SetsUnderstanding the Group Leaders Optimization AlgorithmMatrix representation and CX gateComposing the CNOT gate as a tensor product of two level matricesRewrite circuit with measurements with unitariesHow to understand the operators for watermarking schemes?Implementing these $N×N$ matrices on $log N$ qubitsCalculating entries of unitary transformation



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3












$begingroup$


I was reading a research article on quantum computing and didn't understand the tensor notations for the unitary operations. The article defined two controlled gates.



Let $U_2^m$ be a $2^m times 2^m$ unitary matrix, $I_2^m$ be a $2^m times 2^m$ identity matrix. Then, controlled gates $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ and $V_n^j(U_2^m)$ with $n$ control qubits and $m$ target qubits are defined by $$ C_n^j(U_2^m)=(|jrangle langle j|) otimes U_2^m+ sum_i=0,i neq j^2^n-1((|irangle langle i| otimes I_2^m$$



$$ V_n^j(U_2^m) = U_2^m otimes (|jrangle langle j|) + sum_i=0,i neq j^2^n-1( I_2^m otimes (|irangle langle i| ))$$
Then they say that $C_2^j(X)$ and $V_2^j(X) $are toffoli gates.
Can someone explain the equations that are given
and how does this special case be a Toffoli?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$


















    3












    $begingroup$


    I was reading a research article on quantum computing and didn't understand the tensor notations for the unitary operations. The article defined two controlled gates.



    Let $U_2^m$ be a $2^m times 2^m$ unitary matrix, $I_2^m$ be a $2^m times 2^m$ identity matrix. Then, controlled gates $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ and $V_n^j(U_2^m)$ with $n$ control qubits and $m$ target qubits are defined by $$ C_n^j(U_2^m)=(|jrangle langle j|) otimes U_2^m+ sum_i=0,i neq j^2^n-1((|irangle langle i| otimes I_2^m$$



    $$ V_n^j(U_2^m) = U_2^m otimes (|jrangle langle j|) + sum_i=0,i neq j^2^n-1( I_2^m otimes (|irangle langle i| ))$$
    Then they say that $C_2^j(X)$ and $V_2^j(X) $are toffoli gates.
    Can someone explain the equations that are given
    and how does this special case be a Toffoli?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      I was reading a research article on quantum computing and didn't understand the tensor notations for the unitary operations. The article defined two controlled gates.



      Let $U_2^m$ be a $2^m times 2^m$ unitary matrix, $I_2^m$ be a $2^m times 2^m$ identity matrix. Then, controlled gates $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ and $V_n^j(U_2^m)$ with $n$ control qubits and $m$ target qubits are defined by $$ C_n^j(U_2^m)=(|jrangle langle j|) otimes U_2^m+ sum_i=0,i neq j^2^n-1((|irangle langle i| otimes I_2^m$$



      $$ V_n^j(U_2^m) = U_2^m otimes (|jrangle langle j|) + sum_i=0,i neq j^2^n-1( I_2^m otimes (|irangle langle i| ))$$
      Then they say that $C_2^j(X)$ and $V_2^j(X) $are toffoli gates.
      Can someone explain the equations that are given
      and how does this special case be a Toffoli?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I was reading a research article on quantum computing and didn't understand the tensor notations for the unitary operations. The article defined two controlled gates.



      Let $U_2^m$ be a $2^m times 2^m$ unitary matrix, $I_2^m$ be a $2^m times 2^m$ identity matrix. Then, controlled gates $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ and $V_n^j(U_2^m)$ with $n$ control qubits and $m$ target qubits are defined by $$ C_n^j(U_2^m)=(|jrangle langle j|) otimes U_2^m+ sum_i=0,i neq j^2^n-1((|irangle langle i| otimes I_2^m$$



      $$ V_n^j(U_2^m) = U_2^m otimes (|jrangle langle j|) + sum_i=0,i neq j^2^n-1( I_2^m otimes (|irangle langle i| ))$$
      Then they say that $C_2^j(X)$ and $V_2^j(X) $are toffoli gates.
      Can someone explain the equations that are given
      and how does this special case be a Toffoli?







      quantum-gate tensor-product






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited yesterday









      Sanchayan Dutta

      6,64141556




      6,64141556










      asked yesterday









      UpstartUpstart

      1506




      1506




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          Here $i$ and $j$ are bit strings of size $n$. Correspondingly, $|irangle$, $|jrangle$ are some basis vectors in $2^n$-dimensional space, that corresponds to $n$-qubit register.



          Those controlled operations $C$ and $V$ act on $(n+m)$-qubit space. You can consider first $n$ qubits as control register and last $m$ qubits as target register. Now, $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ applies unitary operation $U_2^m$ on the target register if control register is in the state $|jrangle$ and applies $I_2^m$ (i.e. do nothing) otherwise. You can see this by applying $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ on some vector $|xrangle|yrangle$ from the $(n+m)$-qubit space, where $x$ is some $n$-bit string:



          $$
          C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = (|jrangle langle j|xrangle) otimes U_2^m |yrangle+ sum_i=0,i neq j^2^n-1((|irangle langle i| x rangle) otimes |yrangle)
          $$



          Here $|irangle langle i|xrangle = 0$ if $xneq i$ and it equals $|irangle$ if $x=i$.
          Hence
          $$C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = |jrangle otimes U_2^m |yrangle + 0 = |xrangle otimes U_2^m |yrangle ~~textif~~ x=j$$
          and
          $$C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = 0 + |xrangle|yrangle = |xrangle|yrangle ~~textif~~ xneq j.$$



          Gate $V_n^j(U_2^m)$ is basically the same as $C_n^j(U_2^m)$, though we consider first $m$ qubits as target and last $n$ qubits as control register in this case.



          Now, if $j=11$ then $C_2^j(X)$ is exactly CCNOT gate on 3 qubits. Because we apply $X$ (i.e. negating the value) on the last qubit only if two first qubits are in $|11rangle$ state.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            $y$ is an m bit string ? hence $|y rangle$ lies in a$2^m$ dimensional hilbert space?
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            yes, that is it.
            $endgroup$
            – Danylo Y
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            why is $langle i|xrangle=0$ if $xneq i$ i see that it is an inner product between them but how is it zero because two binary strings dot product can still be non zero if they are not equal
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            $langle a | b rangle = langle a_1 | b_1 rangle langle a_2 | b_2 rangle ... langle a_n | b_n rangle$. This is zero if $a_i neq b_i$ at least for some $i$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danylo Y
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            i read that is $= a_1b_1+ a_2b_2+....+a_nb_n$
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "694"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5899%2fquantum-toffoli-gate-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4












          $begingroup$

          Here $i$ and $j$ are bit strings of size $n$. Correspondingly, $|irangle$, $|jrangle$ are some basis vectors in $2^n$-dimensional space, that corresponds to $n$-qubit register.



          Those controlled operations $C$ and $V$ act on $(n+m)$-qubit space. You can consider first $n$ qubits as control register and last $m$ qubits as target register. Now, $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ applies unitary operation $U_2^m$ on the target register if control register is in the state $|jrangle$ and applies $I_2^m$ (i.e. do nothing) otherwise. You can see this by applying $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ on some vector $|xrangle|yrangle$ from the $(n+m)$-qubit space, where $x$ is some $n$-bit string:



          $$
          C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = (|jrangle langle j|xrangle) otimes U_2^m |yrangle+ sum_i=0,i neq j^2^n-1((|irangle langle i| x rangle) otimes |yrangle)
          $$



          Here $|irangle langle i|xrangle = 0$ if $xneq i$ and it equals $|irangle$ if $x=i$.
          Hence
          $$C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = |jrangle otimes U_2^m |yrangle + 0 = |xrangle otimes U_2^m |yrangle ~~textif~~ x=j$$
          and
          $$C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = 0 + |xrangle|yrangle = |xrangle|yrangle ~~textif~~ xneq j.$$



          Gate $V_n^j(U_2^m)$ is basically the same as $C_n^j(U_2^m)$, though we consider first $m$ qubits as target and last $n$ qubits as control register in this case.



          Now, if $j=11$ then $C_2^j(X)$ is exactly CCNOT gate on 3 qubits. Because we apply $X$ (i.e. negating the value) on the last qubit only if two first qubits are in $|11rangle$ state.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            $y$ is an m bit string ? hence $|y rangle$ lies in a$2^m$ dimensional hilbert space?
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            yes, that is it.
            $endgroup$
            – Danylo Y
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            why is $langle i|xrangle=0$ if $xneq i$ i see that it is an inner product between them but how is it zero because two binary strings dot product can still be non zero if they are not equal
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            $langle a | b rangle = langle a_1 | b_1 rangle langle a_2 | b_2 rangle ... langle a_n | b_n rangle$. This is zero if $a_i neq b_i$ at least for some $i$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danylo Y
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            i read that is $= a_1b_1+ a_2b_2+....+a_nb_n$
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday















          4












          $begingroup$

          Here $i$ and $j$ are bit strings of size $n$. Correspondingly, $|irangle$, $|jrangle$ are some basis vectors in $2^n$-dimensional space, that corresponds to $n$-qubit register.



          Those controlled operations $C$ and $V$ act on $(n+m)$-qubit space. You can consider first $n$ qubits as control register and last $m$ qubits as target register. Now, $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ applies unitary operation $U_2^m$ on the target register if control register is in the state $|jrangle$ and applies $I_2^m$ (i.e. do nothing) otherwise. You can see this by applying $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ on some vector $|xrangle|yrangle$ from the $(n+m)$-qubit space, where $x$ is some $n$-bit string:



          $$
          C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = (|jrangle langle j|xrangle) otimes U_2^m |yrangle+ sum_i=0,i neq j^2^n-1((|irangle langle i| x rangle) otimes |yrangle)
          $$



          Here $|irangle langle i|xrangle = 0$ if $xneq i$ and it equals $|irangle$ if $x=i$.
          Hence
          $$C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = |jrangle otimes U_2^m |yrangle + 0 = |xrangle otimes U_2^m |yrangle ~~textif~~ x=j$$
          and
          $$C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = 0 + |xrangle|yrangle = |xrangle|yrangle ~~textif~~ xneq j.$$



          Gate $V_n^j(U_2^m)$ is basically the same as $C_n^j(U_2^m)$, though we consider first $m$ qubits as target and last $n$ qubits as control register in this case.



          Now, if $j=11$ then $C_2^j(X)$ is exactly CCNOT gate on 3 qubits. Because we apply $X$ (i.e. negating the value) on the last qubit only if two first qubits are in $|11rangle$ state.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            $y$ is an m bit string ? hence $|y rangle$ lies in a$2^m$ dimensional hilbert space?
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            yes, that is it.
            $endgroup$
            – Danylo Y
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            why is $langle i|xrangle=0$ if $xneq i$ i see that it is an inner product between them but how is it zero because two binary strings dot product can still be non zero if they are not equal
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            $langle a | b rangle = langle a_1 | b_1 rangle langle a_2 | b_2 rangle ... langle a_n | b_n rangle$. This is zero if $a_i neq b_i$ at least for some $i$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danylo Y
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            i read that is $= a_1b_1+ a_2b_2+....+a_nb_n$
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday













          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          Here $i$ and $j$ are bit strings of size $n$. Correspondingly, $|irangle$, $|jrangle$ are some basis vectors in $2^n$-dimensional space, that corresponds to $n$-qubit register.



          Those controlled operations $C$ and $V$ act on $(n+m)$-qubit space. You can consider first $n$ qubits as control register and last $m$ qubits as target register. Now, $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ applies unitary operation $U_2^m$ on the target register if control register is in the state $|jrangle$ and applies $I_2^m$ (i.e. do nothing) otherwise. You can see this by applying $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ on some vector $|xrangle|yrangle$ from the $(n+m)$-qubit space, where $x$ is some $n$-bit string:



          $$
          C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = (|jrangle langle j|xrangle) otimes U_2^m |yrangle+ sum_i=0,i neq j^2^n-1((|irangle langle i| x rangle) otimes |yrangle)
          $$



          Here $|irangle langle i|xrangle = 0$ if $xneq i$ and it equals $|irangle$ if $x=i$.
          Hence
          $$C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = |jrangle otimes U_2^m |yrangle + 0 = |xrangle otimes U_2^m |yrangle ~~textif~~ x=j$$
          and
          $$C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = 0 + |xrangle|yrangle = |xrangle|yrangle ~~textif~~ xneq j.$$



          Gate $V_n^j(U_2^m)$ is basically the same as $C_n^j(U_2^m)$, though we consider first $m$ qubits as target and last $n$ qubits as control register in this case.



          Now, if $j=11$ then $C_2^j(X)$ is exactly CCNOT gate on 3 qubits. Because we apply $X$ (i.e. negating the value) on the last qubit only if two first qubits are in $|11rangle$ state.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Here $i$ and $j$ are bit strings of size $n$. Correspondingly, $|irangle$, $|jrangle$ are some basis vectors in $2^n$-dimensional space, that corresponds to $n$-qubit register.



          Those controlled operations $C$ and $V$ act on $(n+m)$-qubit space. You can consider first $n$ qubits as control register and last $m$ qubits as target register. Now, $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ applies unitary operation $U_2^m$ on the target register if control register is in the state $|jrangle$ and applies $I_2^m$ (i.e. do nothing) otherwise. You can see this by applying $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ on some vector $|xrangle|yrangle$ from the $(n+m)$-qubit space, where $x$ is some $n$-bit string:



          $$
          C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = (|jrangle langle j|xrangle) otimes U_2^m |yrangle+ sum_i=0,i neq j^2^n-1((|irangle langle i| x rangle) otimes |yrangle)
          $$



          Here $|irangle langle i|xrangle = 0$ if $xneq i$ and it equals $|irangle$ if $x=i$.
          Hence
          $$C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = |jrangle otimes U_2^m |yrangle + 0 = |xrangle otimes U_2^m |yrangle ~~textif~~ x=j$$
          and
          $$C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = 0 + |xrangle|yrangle = |xrangle|yrangle ~~textif~~ xneq j.$$



          Gate $V_n^j(U_2^m)$ is basically the same as $C_n^j(U_2^m)$, though we consider first $m$ qubits as target and last $n$ qubits as control register in this case.



          Now, if $j=11$ then $C_2^j(X)$ is exactly CCNOT gate on 3 qubits. Because we apply $X$ (i.e. negating the value) on the last qubit only if two first qubits are in $|11rangle$ state.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited yesterday

























          answered yesterday









          Danylo YDanylo Y

          45116




          45116











          • $begingroup$
            $y$ is an m bit string ? hence $|y rangle$ lies in a$2^m$ dimensional hilbert space?
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            yes, that is it.
            $endgroup$
            – Danylo Y
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            why is $langle i|xrangle=0$ if $xneq i$ i see that it is an inner product between them but how is it zero because two binary strings dot product can still be non zero if they are not equal
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            $langle a | b rangle = langle a_1 | b_1 rangle langle a_2 | b_2 rangle ... langle a_n | b_n rangle$. This is zero if $a_i neq b_i$ at least for some $i$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danylo Y
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            i read that is $= a_1b_1+ a_2b_2+....+a_nb_n$
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday
















          • $begingroup$
            $y$ is an m bit string ? hence $|y rangle$ lies in a$2^m$ dimensional hilbert space?
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            yes, that is it.
            $endgroup$
            – Danylo Y
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            why is $langle i|xrangle=0$ if $xneq i$ i see that it is an inner product between them but how is it zero because two binary strings dot product can still be non zero if they are not equal
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            $langle a | b rangle = langle a_1 | b_1 rangle langle a_2 | b_2 rangle ... langle a_n | b_n rangle$. This is zero if $a_i neq b_i$ at least for some $i$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danylo Y
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            i read that is $= a_1b_1+ a_2b_2+....+a_nb_n$
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday















          $begingroup$
          $y$ is an m bit string ? hence $|y rangle$ lies in a$2^m$ dimensional hilbert space?
          $endgroup$
          – Upstart
          yesterday




          $begingroup$
          $y$ is an m bit string ? hence $|y rangle$ lies in a$2^m$ dimensional hilbert space?
          $endgroup$
          – Upstart
          yesterday












          $begingroup$
          yes, that is it.
          $endgroup$
          – Danylo Y
          yesterday





          $begingroup$
          yes, that is it.
          $endgroup$
          – Danylo Y
          yesterday













          $begingroup$
          why is $langle i|xrangle=0$ if $xneq i$ i see that it is an inner product between them but how is it zero because two binary strings dot product can still be non zero if they are not equal
          $endgroup$
          – Upstart
          yesterday





          $begingroup$
          why is $langle i|xrangle=0$ if $xneq i$ i see that it is an inner product between them but how is it zero because two binary strings dot product can still be non zero if they are not equal
          $endgroup$
          – Upstart
          yesterday













          $begingroup$
          $langle a | b rangle = langle a_1 | b_1 rangle langle a_2 | b_2 rangle ... langle a_n | b_n rangle$. This is zero if $a_i neq b_i$ at least for some $i$.
          $endgroup$
          – Danylo Y
          yesterday




          $begingroup$
          $langle a | b rangle = langle a_1 | b_1 rangle langle a_2 | b_2 rangle ... langle a_n | b_n rangle$. This is zero if $a_i neq b_i$ at least for some $i$.
          $endgroup$
          – Danylo Y
          yesterday












          $begingroup$
          i read that is $= a_1b_1+ a_2b_2+....+a_nb_n$
          $endgroup$
          – Upstart
          yesterday




          $begingroup$
          i read that is $= a_1b_1+ a_2b_2+....+a_nb_n$
          $endgroup$
          – Upstart
          yesterday

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantum Computing Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5899%2fquantum-toffoli-gate-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -quantum-gate, tensor-product

          Popular posts from this blog

          Mobil Contents History Mobil brands Former Mobil brands Lukoil transaction Mobil UK Mobil Australia Mobil New Zealand Mobil Greece Mobil in Japan Mobil in Canada Mobil Egypt See also References External links Navigation menuwww.mobil.com"Mobil Corporation"the original"Our Houston campus""Business & Finance: Socony-Vacuum Corp.""Popular Mechanics""Lubrite Technologies""Exxon Mobil campus 'clearly happening'""Toledo Blade - Google News Archive Search""The Lion and the Moose - How 2 Executives Pulled off the Biggest Merger Ever""ExxonMobil Press Release""Lubricants""Archived copy"the original"Mobil 1™ and Mobil Super™ motor oil and synthetic motor oil - Mobil™ Motor Oils""Mobil Delvac""Mobil Industrial website""The State of Competition in Gasoline Marketing: The Effects of Refiner Operations at Retail""Mobil Travel Guide to become Forbes Travel Guide""Hotel Rankings: Forbes Merges with Mobil"the original"Jamieson oil industry history""Mobil news""Caltex pumps for control""Watchdog blocks Caltex bid""Exxon Mobil sells service station network""Mobil Oil New Zealand Limited is New Zealand's oldest oil company, with predecessor companies having first established a presence in the country in 1896""ExxonMobil subsidiaries have a business history in New Zealand stretching back more than 120 years. We are involved in petroleum refining and distribution and the marketing of fuels, lubricants and chemical products""Archived copy"the original"Exxon Mobil to Sell Its Japanese Arm for $3.9 Billion""Gas station merger will end Esso and Mobil's long run in Japan""Esso moves to affiliate itself with PC Optimum, no longer Aeroplan, in loyalty point switch""Mobil brand of gas stations to launch in Canada after deal for 213 Loblaws-owned locations""Mobil Nears Completion of Rebranding 200 Loblaw Gas Stations""Learn about ExxonMobil's operations in Egypt""Petrol and Diesel Service Stations in Egypt - Mobil"Official websiteExxon Mobil corporate websiteMobil Industrial official websiteeeeeeeeDA04275022275790-40000 0001 0860 5061n82045453134887257134887257

          Frič See also Navigation menuinternal link

          Identify plant with long narrow paired leaves and reddish stems Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?What is this plant with long sharp leaves? Is it a weed?What is this 3ft high, stalky plant, with mid sized narrow leaves?What is this young shrub with opposite ovate, crenate leaves and reddish stems?What is this plant with large broad serrated leaves?Identify this upright branching weed with long leaves and reddish stemsPlease help me identify this bulbous plant with long, broad leaves and white flowersWhat is this small annual with narrow gray/green leaves and rust colored daisy-type flowers?What is this chilli plant?Does anyone know what type of chilli plant this is?Help identify this plant