Quantum Toffoli gate equation The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Does quantum control allow to implement any gate?Obtaining gate $e^-iDelta t Z$ from elementary gatesExplicit Conversion Between Universal Gate SetsUnderstanding the Group Leaders Optimization AlgorithmMatrix representation and CX gateComposing the CNOT gate as a tensor product of two level matricesRewrite circuit with measurements with unitariesHow to understand the operators for watermarking schemes?Implementing these $N×N$ matrices on $log N$ qubitsCalculating entries of unitary transformation

Semisimplicity of the category of coherent sheaves?

How are presidential pardons supposed to be used?

Am I ethically obligated to go into work on an off day if the reason is sudden?

Relations between two reciprocal partial derivatives?

What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?

Why can't wing-mounted spoilers be used to steepen approaches?

Does Parliament need to approve the new Brexit delay to 31 October 2019?

Create an outline of font

Can a 1st-level character have an ability score above 18?

The variadic template constructor of my class cannot modify my class members, why is that so?

Sort a list of pairs representing an acyclic, partial automorphism

When did F become S in typeography, and why?

How to pronounce 1ターン?

Wall plug outlet change

How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time

Derivation tree not rendering

Take groceries in checked luggage

Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?

Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?

Working through the single responsibility principle (SRP) in Python when calls are expensive

Didn't get enough time to take a Coding Test - what to do now?

Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?

What aspect of planet Earth must be changed to prevent the industrial revolution?

Is this wall load bearing? Blueprints and photos attached



Quantum Toffoli gate equation



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Does quantum control allow to implement any gate?Obtaining gate $e^-iDelta t Z$ from elementary gatesExplicit Conversion Between Universal Gate SetsUnderstanding the Group Leaders Optimization AlgorithmMatrix representation and CX gateComposing the CNOT gate as a tensor product of two level matricesRewrite circuit with measurements with unitariesHow to understand the operators for watermarking schemes?Implementing these $N×N$ matrices on $log N$ qubitsCalculating entries of unitary transformation



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3












$begingroup$


I was reading a research article on quantum computing and didn't understand the tensor notations for the unitary operations. The article defined two controlled gates.



Let $U_2^m$ be a $2^m times 2^m$ unitary matrix, $I_2^m$ be a $2^m times 2^m$ identity matrix. Then, controlled gates $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ and $V_n^j(U_2^m)$ with $n$ control qubits and $m$ target qubits are defined by $$ C_n^j(U_2^m)=(|jrangle langle j|) otimes U_2^m+ sum_i=0,i neq j^2^n-1((|irangle langle i| otimes I_2^m$$



$$ V_n^j(U_2^m) = U_2^m otimes (|jrangle langle j|) + sum_i=0,i neq j^2^n-1( I_2^m otimes (|irangle langle i| ))$$
Then they say that $C_2^j(X)$ and $V_2^j(X) $are toffoli gates.
Can someone explain the equations that are given
and how does this special case be a Toffoli?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$


















    3












    $begingroup$


    I was reading a research article on quantum computing and didn't understand the tensor notations for the unitary operations. The article defined two controlled gates.



    Let $U_2^m$ be a $2^m times 2^m$ unitary matrix, $I_2^m$ be a $2^m times 2^m$ identity matrix. Then, controlled gates $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ and $V_n^j(U_2^m)$ with $n$ control qubits and $m$ target qubits are defined by $$ C_n^j(U_2^m)=(|jrangle langle j|) otimes U_2^m+ sum_i=0,i neq j^2^n-1((|irangle langle i| otimes I_2^m$$



    $$ V_n^j(U_2^m) = U_2^m otimes (|jrangle langle j|) + sum_i=0,i neq j^2^n-1( I_2^m otimes (|irangle langle i| ))$$
    Then they say that $C_2^j(X)$ and $V_2^j(X) $are toffoli gates.
    Can someone explain the equations that are given
    and how does this special case be a Toffoli?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      I was reading a research article on quantum computing and didn't understand the tensor notations for the unitary operations. The article defined two controlled gates.



      Let $U_2^m$ be a $2^m times 2^m$ unitary matrix, $I_2^m$ be a $2^m times 2^m$ identity matrix. Then, controlled gates $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ and $V_n^j(U_2^m)$ with $n$ control qubits and $m$ target qubits are defined by $$ C_n^j(U_2^m)=(|jrangle langle j|) otimes U_2^m+ sum_i=0,i neq j^2^n-1((|irangle langle i| otimes I_2^m$$



      $$ V_n^j(U_2^m) = U_2^m otimes (|jrangle langle j|) + sum_i=0,i neq j^2^n-1( I_2^m otimes (|irangle langle i| ))$$
      Then they say that $C_2^j(X)$ and $V_2^j(X) $are toffoli gates.
      Can someone explain the equations that are given
      and how does this special case be a Toffoli?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I was reading a research article on quantum computing and didn't understand the tensor notations for the unitary operations. The article defined two controlled gates.



      Let $U_2^m$ be a $2^m times 2^m$ unitary matrix, $I_2^m$ be a $2^m times 2^m$ identity matrix. Then, controlled gates $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ and $V_n^j(U_2^m)$ with $n$ control qubits and $m$ target qubits are defined by $$ C_n^j(U_2^m)=(|jrangle langle j|) otimes U_2^m+ sum_i=0,i neq j^2^n-1((|irangle langle i| otimes I_2^m$$



      $$ V_n^j(U_2^m) = U_2^m otimes (|jrangle langle j|) + sum_i=0,i neq j^2^n-1( I_2^m otimes (|irangle langle i| ))$$
      Then they say that $C_2^j(X)$ and $V_2^j(X) $are toffoli gates.
      Can someone explain the equations that are given
      and how does this special case be a Toffoli?







      quantum-gate tensor-product






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited yesterday









      Sanchayan Dutta

      6,64141556




      6,64141556










      asked yesterday









      UpstartUpstart

      1506




      1506




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          Here $i$ and $j$ are bit strings of size $n$. Correspondingly, $|irangle$, $|jrangle$ are some basis vectors in $2^n$-dimensional space, that corresponds to $n$-qubit register.



          Those controlled operations $C$ and $V$ act on $(n+m)$-qubit space. You can consider first $n$ qubits as control register and last $m$ qubits as target register. Now, $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ applies unitary operation $U_2^m$ on the target register if control register is in the state $|jrangle$ and applies $I_2^m$ (i.e. do nothing) otherwise. You can see this by applying $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ on some vector $|xrangle|yrangle$ from the $(n+m)$-qubit space, where $x$ is some $n$-bit string:



          $$
          C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = (|jrangle langle j|xrangle) otimes U_2^m |yrangle+ sum_i=0,i neq j^2^n-1((|irangle langle i| x rangle) otimes |yrangle)
          $$



          Here $|irangle langle i|xrangle = 0$ if $xneq i$ and it equals $|irangle$ if $x=i$.
          Hence
          $$C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = |jrangle otimes U_2^m |yrangle + 0 = |xrangle otimes U_2^m |yrangle ~~textif~~ x=j$$
          and
          $$C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = 0 + |xrangle|yrangle = |xrangle|yrangle ~~textif~~ xneq j.$$



          Gate $V_n^j(U_2^m)$ is basically the same as $C_n^j(U_2^m)$, though we consider first $m$ qubits as target and last $n$ qubits as control register in this case.



          Now, if $j=11$ then $C_2^j(X)$ is exactly CCNOT gate on 3 qubits. Because we apply $X$ (i.e. negating the value) on the last qubit only if two first qubits are in $|11rangle$ state.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            $y$ is an m bit string ? hence $|y rangle$ lies in a$2^m$ dimensional hilbert space?
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            yes, that is it.
            $endgroup$
            – Danylo Y
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            why is $langle i|xrangle=0$ if $xneq i$ i see that it is an inner product between them but how is it zero because two binary strings dot product can still be non zero if they are not equal
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            $langle a | b rangle = langle a_1 | b_1 rangle langle a_2 | b_2 rangle ... langle a_n | b_n rangle$. This is zero if $a_i neq b_i$ at least for some $i$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danylo Y
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            i read that is $= a_1b_1+ a_2b_2+....+a_nb_n$
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "694"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5899%2fquantum-toffoli-gate-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4












          $begingroup$

          Here $i$ and $j$ are bit strings of size $n$. Correspondingly, $|irangle$, $|jrangle$ are some basis vectors in $2^n$-dimensional space, that corresponds to $n$-qubit register.



          Those controlled operations $C$ and $V$ act on $(n+m)$-qubit space. You can consider first $n$ qubits as control register and last $m$ qubits as target register. Now, $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ applies unitary operation $U_2^m$ on the target register if control register is in the state $|jrangle$ and applies $I_2^m$ (i.e. do nothing) otherwise. You can see this by applying $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ on some vector $|xrangle|yrangle$ from the $(n+m)$-qubit space, where $x$ is some $n$-bit string:



          $$
          C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = (|jrangle langle j|xrangle) otimes U_2^m |yrangle+ sum_i=0,i neq j^2^n-1((|irangle langle i| x rangle) otimes |yrangle)
          $$



          Here $|irangle langle i|xrangle = 0$ if $xneq i$ and it equals $|irangle$ if $x=i$.
          Hence
          $$C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = |jrangle otimes U_2^m |yrangle + 0 = |xrangle otimes U_2^m |yrangle ~~textif~~ x=j$$
          and
          $$C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = 0 + |xrangle|yrangle = |xrangle|yrangle ~~textif~~ xneq j.$$



          Gate $V_n^j(U_2^m)$ is basically the same as $C_n^j(U_2^m)$, though we consider first $m$ qubits as target and last $n$ qubits as control register in this case.



          Now, if $j=11$ then $C_2^j(X)$ is exactly CCNOT gate on 3 qubits. Because we apply $X$ (i.e. negating the value) on the last qubit only if two first qubits are in $|11rangle$ state.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            $y$ is an m bit string ? hence $|y rangle$ lies in a$2^m$ dimensional hilbert space?
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            yes, that is it.
            $endgroup$
            – Danylo Y
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            why is $langle i|xrangle=0$ if $xneq i$ i see that it is an inner product between them but how is it zero because two binary strings dot product can still be non zero if they are not equal
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            $langle a | b rangle = langle a_1 | b_1 rangle langle a_2 | b_2 rangle ... langle a_n | b_n rangle$. This is zero if $a_i neq b_i$ at least for some $i$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danylo Y
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            i read that is $= a_1b_1+ a_2b_2+....+a_nb_n$
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday















          4












          $begingroup$

          Here $i$ and $j$ are bit strings of size $n$. Correspondingly, $|irangle$, $|jrangle$ are some basis vectors in $2^n$-dimensional space, that corresponds to $n$-qubit register.



          Those controlled operations $C$ and $V$ act on $(n+m)$-qubit space. You can consider first $n$ qubits as control register and last $m$ qubits as target register. Now, $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ applies unitary operation $U_2^m$ on the target register if control register is in the state $|jrangle$ and applies $I_2^m$ (i.e. do nothing) otherwise. You can see this by applying $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ on some vector $|xrangle|yrangle$ from the $(n+m)$-qubit space, where $x$ is some $n$-bit string:



          $$
          C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = (|jrangle langle j|xrangle) otimes U_2^m |yrangle+ sum_i=0,i neq j^2^n-1((|irangle langle i| x rangle) otimes |yrangle)
          $$



          Here $|irangle langle i|xrangle = 0$ if $xneq i$ and it equals $|irangle$ if $x=i$.
          Hence
          $$C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = |jrangle otimes U_2^m |yrangle + 0 = |xrangle otimes U_2^m |yrangle ~~textif~~ x=j$$
          and
          $$C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = 0 + |xrangle|yrangle = |xrangle|yrangle ~~textif~~ xneq j.$$



          Gate $V_n^j(U_2^m)$ is basically the same as $C_n^j(U_2^m)$, though we consider first $m$ qubits as target and last $n$ qubits as control register in this case.



          Now, if $j=11$ then $C_2^j(X)$ is exactly CCNOT gate on 3 qubits. Because we apply $X$ (i.e. negating the value) on the last qubit only if two first qubits are in $|11rangle$ state.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            $y$ is an m bit string ? hence $|y rangle$ lies in a$2^m$ dimensional hilbert space?
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            yes, that is it.
            $endgroup$
            – Danylo Y
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            why is $langle i|xrangle=0$ if $xneq i$ i see that it is an inner product between them but how is it zero because two binary strings dot product can still be non zero if they are not equal
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            $langle a | b rangle = langle a_1 | b_1 rangle langle a_2 | b_2 rangle ... langle a_n | b_n rangle$. This is zero if $a_i neq b_i$ at least for some $i$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danylo Y
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            i read that is $= a_1b_1+ a_2b_2+....+a_nb_n$
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday













          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          Here $i$ and $j$ are bit strings of size $n$. Correspondingly, $|irangle$, $|jrangle$ are some basis vectors in $2^n$-dimensional space, that corresponds to $n$-qubit register.



          Those controlled operations $C$ and $V$ act on $(n+m)$-qubit space. You can consider first $n$ qubits as control register and last $m$ qubits as target register. Now, $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ applies unitary operation $U_2^m$ on the target register if control register is in the state $|jrangle$ and applies $I_2^m$ (i.e. do nothing) otherwise. You can see this by applying $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ on some vector $|xrangle|yrangle$ from the $(n+m)$-qubit space, where $x$ is some $n$-bit string:



          $$
          C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = (|jrangle langle j|xrangle) otimes U_2^m |yrangle+ sum_i=0,i neq j^2^n-1((|irangle langle i| x rangle) otimes |yrangle)
          $$



          Here $|irangle langle i|xrangle = 0$ if $xneq i$ and it equals $|irangle$ if $x=i$.
          Hence
          $$C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = |jrangle otimes U_2^m |yrangle + 0 = |xrangle otimes U_2^m |yrangle ~~textif~~ x=j$$
          and
          $$C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = 0 + |xrangle|yrangle = |xrangle|yrangle ~~textif~~ xneq j.$$



          Gate $V_n^j(U_2^m)$ is basically the same as $C_n^j(U_2^m)$, though we consider first $m$ qubits as target and last $n$ qubits as control register in this case.



          Now, if $j=11$ then $C_2^j(X)$ is exactly CCNOT gate on 3 qubits. Because we apply $X$ (i.e. negating the value) on the last qubit only if two first qubits are in $|11rangle$ state.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Here $i$ and $j$ are bit strings of size $n$. Correspondingly, $|irangle$, $|jrangle$ are some basis vectors in $2^n$-dimensional space, that corresponds to $n$-qubit register.



          Those controlled operations $C$ and $V$ act on $(n+m)$-qubit space. You can consider first $n$ qubits as control register and last $m$ qubits as target register. Now, $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ applies unitary operation $U_2^m$ on the target register if control register is in the state $|jrangle$ and applies $I_2^m$ (i.e. do nothing) otherwise. You can see this by applying $C_n^j(U_2^m)$ on some vector $|xrangle|yrangle$ from the $(n+m)$-qubit space, where $x$ is some $n$-bit string:



          $$
          C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = (|jrangle langle j|xrangle) otimes U_2^m |yrangle+ sum_i=0,i neq j^2^n-1((|irangle langle i| x rangle) otimes |yrangle)
          $$



          Here $|irangle langle i|xrangle = 0$ if $xneq i$ and it equals $|irangle$ if $x=i$.
          Hence
          $$C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = |jrangle otimes U_2^m |yrangle + 0 = |xrangle otimes U_2^m |yrangle ~~textif~~ x=j$$
          and
          $$C_n^j(U_2^m) |xrangle|yrangle = 0 + |xrangle|yrangle = |xrangle|yrangle ~~textif~~ xneq j.$$



          Gate $V_n^j(U_2^m)$ is basically the same as $C_n^j(U_2^m)$, though we consider first $m$ qubits as target and last $n$ qubits as control register in this case.



          Now, if $j=11$ then $C_2^j(X)$ is exactly CCNOT gate on 3 qubits. Because we apply $X$ (i.e. negating the value) on the last qubit only if two first qubits are in $|11rangle$ state.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited yesterday

























          answered yesterday









          Danylo YDanylo Y

          45116




          45116











          • $begingroup$
            $y$ is an m bit string ? hence $|y rangle$ lies in a$2^m$ dimensional hilbert space?
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            yes, that is it.
            $endgroup$
            – Danylo Y
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            why is $langle i|xrangle=0$ if $xneq i$ i see that it is an inner product between them but how is it zero because two binary strings dot product can still be non zero if they are not equal
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            $langle a | b rangle = langle a_1 | b_1 rangle langle a_2 | b_2 rangle ... langle a_n | b_n rangle$. This is zero if $a_i neq b_i$ at least for some $i$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danylo Y
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            i read that is $= a_1b_1+ a_2b_2+....+a_nb_n$
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday
















          • $begingroup$
            $y$ is an m bit string ? hence $|y rangle$ lies in a$2^m$ dimensional hilbert space?
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            yes, that is it.
            $endgroup$
            – Danylo Y
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            why is $langle i|xrangle=0$ if $xneq i$ i see that it is an inner product between them but how is it zero because two binary strings dot product can still be non zero if they are not equal
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            $langle a | b rangle = langle a_1 | b_1 rangle langle a_2 | b_2 rangle ... langle a_n | b_n rangle$. This is zero if $a_i neq b_i$ at least for some $i$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danylo Y
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            i read that is $= a_1b_1+ a_2b_2+....+a_nb_n$
            $endgroup$
            – Upstart
            yesterday















          $begingroup$
          $y$ is an m bit string ? hence $|y rangle$ lies in a$2^m$ dimensional hilbert space?
          $endgroup$
          – Upstart
          yesterday




          $begingroup$
          $y$ is an m bit string ? hence $|y rangle$ lies in a$2^m$ dimensional hilbert space?
          $endgroup$
          – Upstart
          yesterday












          $begingroup$
          yes, that is it.
          $endgroup$
          – Danylo Y
          yesterday





          $begingroup$
          yes, that is it.
          $endgroup$
          – Danylo Y
          yesterday













          $begingroup$
          why is $langle i|xrangle=0$ if $xneq i$ i see that it is an inner product between them but how is it zero because two binary strings dot product can still be non zero if they are not equal
          $endgroup$
          – Upstart
          yesterday





          $begingroup$
          why is $langle i|xrangle=0$ if $xneq i$ i see that it is an inner product between them but how is it zero because two binary strings dot product can still be non zero if they are not equal
          $endgroup$
          – Upstart
          yesterday













          $begingroup$
          $langle a | b rangle = langle a_1 | b_1 rangle langle a_2 | b_2 rangle ... langle a_n | b_n rangle$. This is zero if $a_i neq b_i$ at least for some $i$.
          $endgroup$
          – Danylo Y
          yesterday




          $begingroup$
          $langle a | b rangle = langle a_1 | b_1 rangle langle a_2 | b_2 rangle ... langle a_n | b_n rangle$. This is zero if $a_i neq b_i$ at least for some $i$.
          $endgroup$
          – Danylo Y
          yesterday












          $begingroup$
          i read that is $= a_1b_1+ a_2b_2+....+a_nb_n$
          $endgroup$
          – Upstart
          yesterday




          $begingroup$
          i read that is $= a_1b_1+ a_2b_2+....+a_nb_n$
          $endgroup$
          – Upstart
          yesterday

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantum Computing Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5899%2fquantum-toffoli-gate-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -quantum-gate, tensor-product

          Popular posts from this blog

          Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god existsWord for having a definite opinion while simultaneously withholding judgment?What's the opposite of “newcomer? Is ”veteran" OK?What do you call an “atheist” who might believe in an afterlife?What's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Word for someone who dismisses contrary opinions as irrational?Somone who thinks they are overly special/out of the ordinaryIs there a word, phrase or idiom for “a person who is incapable of thinking about the future”?The belief that a god is human-likeA word for a non-famous person/thing you have heard a lot aboutAdjective for a person who enjoys taking care of their appearance

          What was this official D&D 3.5e Lovecraft-flavored rulebook?What was this set of RPG tools called?As a first-time DM should I let my players play complex character classes and roles?Nymph's Kiss and the RelationshipWhat was the name of this Cleric Prestige Class that shapes metal with its bare hands?Are the 3.5e Dragonlance books third party or official works?What's up with the domain Vile Darkness?What was this 80s book about RPGs?What was the name of this Werewolf band?What book had Rituals to “upgrade” animal companions to keep them viable at higher levels?What was this RPG that had rules for player-owned businesses?

          2017 IndyCar Series Contents Series news Teams and drivers Schedule Season summary Footnotes References External links Navigation menu"INDYCAR: Initial 2018 bodywork concepts unveiled"the original"IndyCar confirms switch to Performance Friction brakes in 2017""AJ Foyt Racing will switch to Chevy"the original"Carlos Munoz, Conor Daly will drive for AJ Foyt Racing""Zach Veach's Indy 500 Debut Confirmed with Foyt""No mass exodus from Honda after Ganassi switch""Ex-F1 driver Sato joins Andretti Autosport for 2017 IndyCar season""IndyCar's Ryan Hunter-Reay, sponsor DHL paired through 2020""hhgregg and Andretti Autosport announce partnership for key races in 2016""INDYCAR: Rossi re-signs with Andretti"the original"McLaren Formula 1 - Fernando Alonso to race at Indy 500 with McLaren, Honda and Andretti Autosport""Shank will finally take part in Indy 500 with Harvey, Andretti | MotorSportsTalk""Andretti adds Jack Harvey to Indy 500 field""Ganassi switches to Honda power for 2017""INDYCAR: Chilton returns to Ganassi"the original"IndyCar silly season: Who's going where in 2017?""INDYCAR: Kanaan, NTT Data return to Ganassi"the original"Kimball to remain at Ganassi for 2017""Coyne confirms Bourdais for 2017 IndyCar season""Davison to sub for Bourdais in Indy 500"the original"Gutierrez confirmed for Detroit IndyCar debut""Gutierrez returns with Coyne for rest of 2017 season""Vautier to drive for Coyne at Texas"the original"INDYCAR: Coyne confirms Jones for 2017"the original"Pippa Mann returns to Coyne for Indy 500""Karam, Dreyer & Reinbold teaming up again for Indianapolis 500""Pigot to return to Ed Carpenter Racing""Hildebrand confirmed as full-time Ed Carpenter driver""Veach to replace injured Hildebrand at Barber"the originalNew Team Harding Racing Enters Chaves for 101st Indianapolis 500"Juncos Racing Announces Entry in 101st Running of the Indianapolis 500 :: Juncos Racing""Juncos confirms Pigot for Indy 500""Saavedra confirmed in Juncos' second 500 entry"the original"Lazier confirms Indy 500 run after son's USF2000 debut"the original"Claman DeMelo to race for RLLR at Sonoma"the original"Rahal signs Servia and ace engineer for 2017""IndyCar: Aleshin returns with Schmidt"the original"Aleshin replaced by Saavedra for Toronto""Jack Harvey will pilot SPM No. 7 car at Watkins Glen, Sonoma""Jay Howard confirmed in Tony Stewart's supported SPM Indy entry""INDYCAR: Newgarden to wave the flag at Penske"the original"Pagenaud opts for No. 1 in 2017"the original"Penske confirms Newgarden for 2017""Montoya to stay with Team Penske in 2017""Target leaving IndyCar after 27 seasons with Chip Ganassi""Cavin: IndyCar could see complete driver/team shakeup in 2017""End of the road for KV Racing?""KV Racing confirms closure, equipment sold to Juncos""Juncos confirms IndyCar Series entry"the original"Juncos readies IndyCar program, aims for '17 500"the original"Harding Racing to add Texas, Pocono to schedule"the original"Sato signs with Andretti Autosport for 2017""INDYCAR: Aleshin in Doubt at SPM"the original"Long Beach notebook: JR Hildebrand breaks hand""Hildebrand cleared to return at Phoenix"the original"Bourdais to undergo surgery on multiple fractures""Aleshin loses Schmidt Peterson IndyCar ride""Saavedra in at SPM for Pocono, Gateway"the original"Bourdais to make return at Gateway"the original"The IndyCar Grand Prix no longer is sponsored by Angie's List""2017 IndyCar Series rulebook""2017 Verizon IndyCar Series Official Rulebook"Official websiteeeeee