Why can't I chown a pipe? [on hold] The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsWhy doesn't shell automatically fix “useless use of cat”?Why can't a normal user `chown` a file?What does `chown root.root $file` mean?If chown can change groups, why was chgrp created?Why does a '.' work in chown?chown only where needed / speedup chownWhy can't I pipe `pwd` to `open` on macOS?Can't chown file within lxc containerWhy can't I pipe to parallel?Why is there a chgrp command if there is chownCan't chown 0 (root) in Cygwin

What force causes entropy to increase?

What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?

University's motivation for having tenure-track positions

ELI5: Why do they say that Israel would have been the fourth country to land a spacecraft on the Moon and why do they call it low cost?

Simulating Exploding Dice

Can the DM override racial traits?

Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?

Does Parliament hold absolute power in the UK?

I'm thinking of a number

Do warforged have souls?

how can a perfect fourth interval be considered either consonant or dissonant?

Can the prologue be the backstory of your main character?

How did the audience guess the pentatonic scale in Bobby McFerrin's presentation?

Python - Fishing Simulator

rotate text in posterbox

Do working physicists consider Newtonian mechanics to be "falsified"?

Format single node in tikzcd

Can a 1st-level character have an ability score above 18?

What aspect of planet Earth must be changed to prevent the industrial revolution?

Difference between "generating set" and free product?

Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?

In horse breeding, what is the female equivalent of putting a horse out "to stud"?

Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?

How to copy the contents of all files with a certain name into a new file?



Why can't I chown a pipe? [on hold]



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsWhy doesn't shell automatically fix “useless use of cat”?Why can't a normal user `chown` a file?What does `chown root.root $file` mean?If chown can change groups, why was chgrp created?Why does a '.' work in chown?chown only where needed / speedup chownWhy can't I pipe `pwd` to `open` on macOS?Can't chown file within lxc containerWhy can't I pipe to parallel?Why is there a chgrp command if there is chownCan't chown 0 (root) in Cygwin



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















From a discussion on useless use of cat.



I decided to see if It was possible to avoid some of the troubles by changing the owner of the pipe. So I did:



# cat | cat &
[1] 16500
# cd /proc/16500/fd
# ls -l
lr-x------ root root 0 -> pipe:[931613]
lrwx------ root root 1 -> /dev/tty1
lrwx------ root root 2 -> /dev/tty1
# chown --dereference daemon 0
# ls -l
lr-x------ root root 0 -> pipe:[931613]
lrwx------ root root 1 -> /dev/tty1
lrwx------ root root 2 -> /dev/tty1


I also tried chown and chown -L. No go. I'm convinced this is simply impossible, but why? They clearly have inodes. That 931613 is the inode number.



In the case I am actually interested in, the process on the right would be running at lower privileges and I'd kind of like it to own its own handles so that it can re-open them.










share|improve this question













put on hold as off-topic by Stephen Harris, muru, roaima, Kusalananda 23 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Questions describing a problem that can't be reproduced and seemingly went away on its own (or went away when a typo was fixed) are off-topic as they are unlikely to help future readers." – Stephen Harris, muru, roaima, Kusalananda
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






















    2















    From a discussion on useless use of cat.



    I decided to see if It was possible to avoid some of the troubles by changing the owner of the pipe. So I did:



    # cat | cat &
    [1] 16500
    # cd /proc/16500/fd
    # ls -l
    lr-x------ root root 0 -> pipe:[931613]
    lrwx------ root root 1 -> /dev/tty1
    lrwx------ root root 2 -> /dev/tty1
    # chown --dereference daemon 0
    # ls -l
    lr-x------ root root 0 -> pipe:[931613]
    lrwx------ root root 1 -> /dev/tty1
    lrwx------ root root 2 -> /dev/tty1


    I also tried chown and chown -L. No go. I'm convinced this is simply impossible, but why? They clearly have inodes. That 931613 is the inode number.



    In the case I am actually interested in, the process on the right would be running at lower privileges and I'd kind of like it to own its own handles so that it can re-open them.










    share|improve this question













    put on hold as off-topic by Stephen Harris, muru, roaima, Kusalananda 23 hours ago


    This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


    • "Questions describing a problem that can't be reproduced and seemingly went away on its own (or went away when a typo was fixed) are off-topic as they are unlikely to help future readers." – Stephen Harris, muru, roaima, Kusalananda
    If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


















      2












      2








      2


      1






      From a discussion on useless use of cat.



      I decided to see if It was possible to avoid some of the troubles by changing the owner of the pipe. So I did:



      # cat | cat &
      [1] 16500
      # cd /proc/16500/fd
      # ls -l
      lr-x------ root root 0 -> pipe:[931613]
      lrwx------ root root 1 -> /dev/tty1
      lrwx------ root root 2 -> /dev/tty1
      # chown --dereference daemon 0
      # ls -l
      lr-x------ root root 0 -> pipe:[931613]
      lrwx------ root root 1 -> /dev/tty1
      lrwx------ root root 2 -> /dev/tty1


      I also tried chown and chown -L. No go. I'm convinced this is simply impossible, but why? They clearly have inodes. That 931613 is the inode number.



      In the case I am actually interested in, the process on the right would be running at lower privileges and I'd kind of like it to own its own handles so that it can re-open them.










      share|improve this question














      From a discussion on useless use of cat.



      I decided to see if It was possible to avoid some of the troubles by changing the owner of the pipe. So I did:



      # cat | cat &
      [1] 16500
      # cd /proc/16500/fd
      # ls -l
      lr-x------ root root 0 -> pipe:[931613]
      lrwx------ root root 1 -> /dev/tty1
      lrwx------ root root 2 -> /dev/tty1
      # chown --dereference daemon 0
      # ls -l
      lr-x------ root root 0 -> pipe:[931613]
      lrwx------ root root 1 -> /dev/tty1
      lrwx------ root root 2 -> /dev/tty1


      I also tried chown and chown -L. No go. I'm convinced this is simply impossible, but why? They clearly have inodes. That 931613 is the inode number.



      In the case I am actually interested in, the process on the right would be running at lower privileges and I'd kind of like it to own its own handles so that it can re-open them.







      pipe chown






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked yesterday









      JoshuaJoshua

      1,332816




      1,332816




      put on hold as off-topic by Stephen Harris, muru, roaima, Kusalananda 23 hours ago


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "Questions describing a problem that can't be reproduced and seemingly went away on its own (or went away when a typo was fixed) are off-topic as they are unlikely to help future readers." – Stephen Harris, muru, roaima, Kusalananda
      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







      put on hold as off-topic by Stephen Harris, muru, roaima, Kusalananda 23 hours ago


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "Questions describing a problem that can't be reproduced and seemingly went away on its own (or went away when a typo was fixed) are off-topic as they are unlikely to help future readers." – Stephen Harris, muru, roaima, Kusalananda
      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          Turns out I goofed up my ls command.



          # ls -lL
          lr-x------ daemon root 0 -> pipe:[931613]
          lrwx------ root root 1 -> /dev/tty1
          lrwx------ root root 2 -> /dev/tty1





          share|improve this answer





























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            Turns out I goofed up my ls command.



            # ls -lL
            lr-x------ daemon root 0 -> pipe:[931613]
            lrwx------ root root 1 -> /dev/tty1
            lrwx------ root root 2 -> /dev/tty1





            share|improve this answer



























              0














              Turns out I goofed up my ls command.



              # ls -lL
              lr-x------ daemon root 0 -> pipe:[931613]
              lrwx------ root root 1 -> /dev/tty1
              lrwx------ root root 2 -> /dev/tty1





              share|improve this answer

























                0












                0








                0







                Turns out I goofed up my ls command.



                # ls -lL
                lr-x------ daemon root 0 -> pipe:[931613]
                lrwx------ root root 1 -> /dev/tty1
                lrwx------ root root 2 -> /dev/tty1





                share|improve this answer













                Turns out I goofed up my ls command.



                # ls -lL
                lr-x------ daemon root 0 -> pipe:[931613]
                lrwx------ root root 1 -> /dev/tty1
                lrwx------ root root 2 -> /dev/tty1






                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered yesterday









                JoshuaJoshua

                1,332816




                1,332816













                    -chown, pipe

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god existsWord for having a definite opinion while simultaneously withholding judgment?What's the opposite of “newcomer? Is ”veteran" OK?What do you call an “atheist” who might believe in an afterlife?What's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Word for someone who dismisses contrary opinions as irrational?Somone who thinks they are overly special/out of the ordinaryIs there a word, phrase or idiom for “a person who is incapable of thinking about the future”?The belief that a god is human-likeA word for a non-famous person/thing you have heard a lot aboutAdjective for a person who enjoys taking care of their appearance

                    What was this official D&D 3.5e Lovecraft-flavored rulebook?What was this set of RPG tools called?As a first-time DM should I let my players play complex character classes and roles?Nymph's Kiss and the RelationshipWhat was the name of this Cleric Prestige Class that shapes metal with its bare hands?Are the 3.5e Dragonlance books third party or official works?What's up with the domain Vile Darkness?What was this 80s book about RPGs?What was the name of this Werewolf band?What book had Rituals to “upgrade” animal companions to keep them viable at higher levels?What was this RPG that had rules for player-owned businesses?

                    2017 IndyCar Series Contents Series news Teams and drivers Schedule Season summary Footnotes References External links Navigation menu"INDYCAR: Initial 2018 bodywork concepts unveiled"the original"IndyCar confirms switch to Performance Friction brakes in 2017""AJ Foyt Racing will switch to Chevy"the original"Carlos Munoz, Conor Daly will drive for AJ Foyt Racing""Zach Veach's Indy 500 Debut Confirmed with Foyt""No mass exodus from Honda after Ganassi switch""Ex-F1 driver Sato joins Andretti Autosport for 2017 IndyCar season""IndyCar's Ryan Hunter-Reay, sponsor DHL paired through 2020""hhgregg and Andretti Autosport announce partnership for key races in 2016""INDYCAR: Rossi re-signs with Andretti"the original"McLaren Formula 1 - Fernando Alonso to race at Indy 500 with McLaren, Honda and Andretti Autosport""Shank will finally take part in Indy 500 with Harvey, Andretti | MotorSportsTalk""Andretti adds Jack Harvey to Indy 500 field""Ganassi switches to Honda power for 2017""INDYCAR: Chilton returns to Ganassi"the original"IndyCar silly season: Who's going where in 2017?""INDYCAR: Kanaan, NTT Data return to Ganassi"the original"Kimball to remain at Ganassi for 2017""Coyne confirms Bourdais for 2017 IndyCar season""Davison to sub for Bourdais in Indy 500"the original"Gutierrez confirmed for Detroit IndyCar debut""Gutierrez returns with Coyne for rest of 2017 season""Vautier to drive for Coyne at Texas"the original"INDYCAR: Coyne confirms Jones for 2017"the original"Pippa Mann returns to Coyne for Indy 500""Karam, Dreyer & Reinbold teaming up again for Indianapolis 500""Pigot to return to Ed Carpenter Racing""Hildebrand confirmed as full-time Ed Carpenter driver""Veach to replace injured Hildebrand at Barber"the originalNew Team Harding Racing Enters Chaves for 101st Indianapolis 500"Juncos Racing Announces Entry in 101st Running of the Indianapolis 500 :: Juncos Racing""Juncos confirms Pigot for Indy 500""Saavedra confirmed in Juncos' second 500 entry"the original"Lazier confirms Indy 500 run after son's USF2000 debut"the original"Claman DeMelo to race for RLLR at Sonoma"the original"Rahal signs Servia and ace engineer for 2017""IndyCar: Aleshin returns with Schmidt"the original"Aleshin replaced by Saavedra for Toronto""Jack Harvey will pilot SPM No. 7 car at Watkins Glen, Sonoma""Jay Howard confirmed in Tony Stewart's supported SPM Indy entry""INDYCAR: Newgarden to wave the flag at Penske"the original"Pagenaud opts for No. 1 in 2017"the original"Penske confirms Newgarden for 2017""Montoya to stay with Team Penske in 2017""Target leaving IndyCar after 27 seasons with Chip Ganassi""Cavin: IndyCar could see complete driver/team shakeup in 2017""End of the road for KV Racing?""KV Racing confirms closure, equipment sold to Juncos""Juncos confirms IndyCar Series entry"the original"Juncos readies IndyCar program, aims for '17 500"the original"Harding Racing to add Texas, Pocono to schedule"the original"Sato signs with Andretti Autosport for 2017""INDYCAR: Aleshin in Doubt at SPM"the original"Long Beach notebook: JR Hildebrand breaks hand""Hildebrand cleared to return at Phoenix"the original"Bourdais to undergo surgery on multiple fractures""Aleshin loses Schmidt Peterson IndyCar ride""Saavedra in at SPM for Pocono, Gateway"the original"Bourdais to make return at Gateway"the original"The IndyCar Grand Prix no longer is sponsored by Angie's List""2017 IndyCar Series rulebook""2017 Verizon IndyCar Series Official Rulebook"Official websiteeeeee