apt update always overrides old config file The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsTrouble migrating from Yum to apt-getInstalling courier-mta causes sendmail to be installed instead“except (IOError, OSError), e: SyntaxError: invalid syntax” when configuring python-lockfilemessed up system after offline package installation for WLAN driverIs it possible to have a Debian package pre-install script run apt-get commands?How to install latest version of Tiled Editor on Linux Mint?How do I install a specific version of reiserfsprogs?Getting a local copy of Debian's extended package descriptionsReading package lists…Error!APT version conflicts across different architectures even with Multi-Arch: same?

Identify 80s or 90s comics with ripped creatures (not dwarves)

Define a list range inside a list

"... to apply for a visa" or "... and applied for a visa"?

Can the Right Ascension and Argument of Perigee of a spacecraft's orbit keep varying by themselves with time?

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

Variable with quotation marks "$()"

What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?

Would an alien lifeform be able to achieve space travel if lacking in vision?

How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?

Using dividends to reduce short term capital gains?

Example of compact Riemannian manifold with only one geodesic.

Does Parliament hold absolute power in the UK?

Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?

How to support a colleague who finds meetings extremely tiring?

Can the DM override racial traits?

What force causes entropy to increase?

Accepted by European university, rejected by all American ones I applied to? Possible reasons?

My body leaves; my core can stay

What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?

Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?

Do I have Disadvantage attacking with an off-hand weapon?

Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?

How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time

Why can't wing-mounted spoilers be used to steepen approaches?



apt update always overrides old config file



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsTrouble migrating from Yum to apt-getInstalling courier-mta causes sendmail to be installed instead“except (IOError, OSError), e: SyntaxError: invalid syntax” when configuring python-lockfilemessed up system after offline package installation for WLAN driverIs it possible to have a Debian package pre-install script run apt-get commands?How to install latest version of Tiled Editor on Linux Mint?How do I install a specific version of reiserfsprogs?Getting a local copy of Debian's extended package descriptionsReading package lists…Error!APT version conflicts across different architectures even with Multi-Arch: same?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1















I am building and distributing my code as a deb package (built with cmake, packaged with CpackDeb) to a Ubuntucore-based 16.04 LTS. The package installs a config file among else. I can't get apt/apt-get to keep the old configuration file during an update. It silently overrides the old config in all test cases and regardless of whether it had been edited or not. Things I tried:



$ apt-get -o Dpkg::Options::="--force-confdef" -o Dpkg::Options::="--force-confold" install <package>

$ export DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive ; apt-get install -y -o Dpkg::Options::="--force-confold" <package>


And some variations. The result is always the same - a silent override of the old config file. apt version is 1.2.31, I am on an arm64 processor.



Maybe I am not packaging the deb correctly? My config file is simply an installable. I'm not aware of any special requirements for config files, are there any?










share|improve this question
























  • Where is your config file installed? Are you using debhelper to build your package?

    – Stephen Kitt
    yesterday












  • I am using Cmake's CPackDeb. Installed to /etc/<foo>/

    – user907323
    yesterday

















1















I am building and distributing my code as a deb package (built with cmake, packaged with CpackDeb) to a Ubuntucore-based 16.04 LTS. The package installs a config file among else. I can't get apt/apt-get to keep the old configuration file during an update. It silently overrides the old config in all test cases and regardless of whether it had been edited or not. Things I tried:



$ apt-get -o Dpkg::Options::="--force-confdef" -o Dpkg::Options::="--force-confold" install <package>

$ export DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive ; apt-get install -y -o Dpkg::Options::="--force-confold" <package>


And some variations. The result is always the same - a silent override of the old config file. apt version is 1.2.31, I am on an arm64 processor.



Maybe I am not packaging the deb correctly? My config file is simply an installable. I'm not aware of any special requirements for config files, are there any?










share|improve this question
























  • Where is your config file installed? Are you using debhelper to build your package?

    – Stephen Kitt
    yesterday












  • I am using Cmake's CPackDeb. Installed to /etc/<foo>/

    – user907323
    yesterday













1












1








1








I am building and distributing my code as a deb package (built with cmake, packaged with CpackDeb) to a Ubuntucore-based 16.04 LTS. The package installs a config file among else. I can't get apt/apt-get to keep the old configuration file during an update. It silently overrides the old config in all test cases and regardless of whether it had been edited or not. Things I tried:



$ apt-get -o Dpkg::Options::="--force-confdef" -o Dpkg::Options::="--force-confold" install <package>

$ export DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive ; apt-get install -y -o Dpkg::Options::="--force-confold" <package>


And some variations. The result is always the same - a silent override of the old config file. apt version is 1.2.31, I am on an arm64 processor.



Maybe I am not packaging the deb correctly? My config file is simply an installable. I'm not aware of any special requirements for config files, are there any?










share|improve this question
















I am building and distributing my code as a deb package (built with cmake, packaged with CpackDeb) to a Ubuntucore-based 16.04 LTS. The package installs a config file among else. I can't get apt/apt-get to keep the old configuration file during an update. It silently overrides the old config in all test cases and regardless of whether it had been edited or not. Things I tried:



$ apt-get -o Dpkg::Options::="--force-confdef" -o Dpkg::Options::="--force-confold" install <package>

$ export DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive ; apt-get install -y -o Dpkg::Options::="--force-confold" <package>


And some variations. The result is always the same - a silent override of the old config file. apt version is 1.2.31, I am on an arm64 processor.



Maybe I am not packaging the deb correctly? My config file is simply an installable. I'm not aware of any special requirements for config files, are there any?







apt deb






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday







user907323

















asked yesterday









user907323user907323

487




487












  • Where is your config file installed? Are you using debhelper to build your package?

    – Stephen Kitt
    yesterday












  • I am using Cmake's CPackDeb. Installed to /etc/<foo>/

    – user907323
    yesterday

















  • Where is your config file installed? Are you using debhelper to build your package?

    – Stephen Kitt
    yesterday












  • I am using Cmake's CPackDeb. Installed to /etc/<foo>/

    – user907323
    yesterday
















Where is your config file installed? Are you using debhelper to build your package?

– Stephen Kitt
yesterday






Where is your config file installed? Are you using debhelper to build your package?

– Stephen Kitt
yesterday














I am using Cmake's CPackDeb. Installed to /etc/<foo>/

– user907323
yesterday





I am using Cmake's CPackDeb. Installed to /etc/<foo>/

– user907323
yesterday










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














You need to include a conffiles file in your control control.tar.gz. When creating a package with dpkg-deb this is placed in DEBIAN/conffiles. This file should have exactly one line for every config file contained in your debian package. Each line specifies the full path of a config file.



See https://manpages.debian.org/testing/dpkg-dev/deb-conffiles.5.en.html



The result of including this will be that these files are registered on the system as config files and will not be automatically overwritten.




I've not used CPackDeb myself, but there's a reference for how to add files to control.tar.gz here:



https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.0/module/CPackDeb.html?highlight=conffiles



set(CPACK_DEBIAN_PACKAGE_CONTROL_EXTRA
"${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR/prerm;$CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR/postrm")





share|improve this answer

























  • ... assuming you're using dh_installdeb which I've never bothered to. But okay I'll edit

    – Philip Couling
    yesterday











  • You’re making a few assumptions which are liable to confuse readers. If building from source, you hardly ever manipulate DEBIAN directly. If you write a conffiles in your control directory, it won’t be taken into account in debhelper compatibility level 12 or later. Of course if you don’t use debhelper then you need to deal with things yourself but that’s not what I’d expect new packagers to do...

    – Stephen Kitt
    yesterday












  • Aha, so I am indeed not packaging correctly. Any idea how to achieve that behavior with CPack? Will look into CPACK_DEBIAN_PACKAGE_CONTROL_EXTRA.

    – user907323
    yesterday












  • I can see the ambiguity with debhelper's nomenclature. I've edited to quantify the use of the DEBIAN directory for dpkg-deb although I note a conffiles file for installation into DEBIAN is also correct for debhelper where it does not automatically find config files. The underlying file format doesn't use the name DEBIAN and I was unaware of any name collisions with other packaging utilities.

    – Philip Couling
    yesterday












  • @Philip thanks, your answer seems OK to me now. The assumptions I was referring to were that (1) that users were building binary packages directly, using dpkg-deb (which you’ve made explicit) and (2) that conffiles is a universal solution — as mentioned above, in the current compatibility level (12), debhelper will ignore any conffiles provided in the packaging.

    – Stephen Kitt
    yesterday











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f511862%2fapt-update-always-overrides-old-config-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














You need to include a conffiles file in your control control.tar.gz. When creating a package with dpkg-deb this is placed in DEBIAN/conffiles. This file should have exactly one line for every config file contained in your debian package. Each line specifies the full path of a config file.



See https://manpages.debian.org/testing/dpkg-dev/deb-conffiles.5.en.html



The result of including this will be that these files are registered on the system as config files and will not be automatically overwritten.




I've not used CPackDeb myself, but there's a reference for how to add files to control.tar.gz here:



https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.0/module/CPackDeb.html?highlight=conffiles



set(CPACK_DEBIAN_PACKAGE_CONTROL_EXTRA
"${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR/prerm;$CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR/postrm")





share|improve this answer

























  • ... assuming you're using dh_installdeb which I've never bothered to. But okay I'll edit

    – Philip Couling
    yesterday











  • You’re making a few assumptions which are liable to confuse readers. If building from source, you hardly ever manipulate DEBIAN directly. If you write a conffiles in your control directory, it won’t be taken into account in debhelper compatibility level 12 or later. Of course if you don’t use debhelper then you need to deal with things yourself but that’s not what I’d expect new packagers to do...

    – Stephen Kitt
    yesterday












  • Aha, so I am indeed not packaging correctly. Any idea how to achieve that behavior with CPack? Will look into CPACK_DEBIAN_PACKAGE_CONTROL_EXTRA.

    – user907323
    yesterday












  • I can see the ambiguity with debhelper's nomenclature. I've edited to quantify the use of the DEBIAN directory for dpkg-deb although I note a conffiles file for installation into DEBIAN is also correct for debhelper where it does not automatically find config files. The underlying file format doesn't use the name DEBIAN and I was unaware of any name collisions with other packaging utilities.

    – Philip Couling
    yesterday












  • @Philip thanks, your answer seems OK to me now. The assumptions I was referring to were that (1) that users were building binary packages directly, using dpkg-deb (which you’ve made explicit) and (2) that conffiles is a universal solution — as mentioned above, in the current compatibility level (12), debhelper will ignore any conffiles provided in the packaging.

    – Stephen Kitt
    yesterday















2














You need to include a conffiles file in your control control.tar.gz. When creating a package with dpkg-deb this is placed in DEBIAN/conffiles. This file should have exactly one line for every config file contained in your debian package. Each line specifies the full path of a config file.



See https://manpages.debian.org/testing/dpkg-dev/deb-conffiles.5.en.html



The result of including this will be that these files are registered on the system as config files and will not be automatically overwritten.




I've not used CPackDeb myself, but there's a reference for how to add files to control.tar.gz here:



https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.0/module/CPackDeb.html?highlight=conffiles



set(CPACK_DEBIAN_PACKAGE_CONTROL_EXTRA
"${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR/prerm;$CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR/postrm")





share|improve this answer

























  • ... assuming you're using dh_installdeb which I've never bothered to. But okay I'll edit

    – Philip Couling
    yesterday











  • You’re making a few assumptions which are liable to confuse readers. If building from source, you hardly ever manipulate DEBIAN directly. If you write a conffiles in your control directory, it won’t be taken into account in debhelper compatibility level 12 or later. Of course if you don’t use debhelper then you need to deal with things yourself but that’s not what I’d expect new packagers to do...

    – Stephen Kitt
    yesterday












  • Aha, so I am indeed not packaging correctly. Any idea how to achieve that behavior with CPack? Will look into CPACK_DEBIAN_PACKAGE_CONTROL_EXTRA.

    – user907323
    yesterday












  • I can see the ambiguity with debhelper's nomenclature. I've edited to quantify the use of the DEBIAN directory for dpkg-deb although I note a conffiles file for installation into DEBIAN is also correct for debhelper where it does not automatically find config files. The underlying file format doesn't use the name DEBIAN and I was unaware of any name collisions with other packaging utilities.

    – Philip Couling
    yesterday












  • @Philip thanks, your answer seems OK to me now. The assumptions I was referring to were that (1) that users were building binary packages directly, using dpkg-deb (which you’ve made explicit) and (2) that conffiles is a universal solution — as mentioned above, in the current compatibility level (12), debhelper will ignore any conffiles provided in the packaging.

    – Stephen Kitt
    yesterday













2












2








2







You need to include a conffiles file in your control control.tar.gz. When creating a package with dpkg-deb this is placed in DEBIAN/conffiles. This file should have exactly one line for every config file contained in your debian package. Each line specifies the full path of a config file.



See https://manpages.debian.org/testing/dpkg-dev/deb-conffiles.5.en.html



The result of including this will be that these files are registered on the system as config files and will not be automatically overwritten.




I've not used CPackDeb myself, but there's a reference for how to add files to control.tar.gz here:



https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.0/module/CPackDeb.html?highlight=conffiles



set(CPACK_DEBIAN_PACKAGE_CONTROL_EXTRA
"${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR/prerm;$CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR/postrm")





share|improve this answer















You need to include a conffiles file in your control control.tar.gz. When creating a package with dpkg-deb this is placed in DEBIAN/conffiles. This file should have exactly one line for every config file contained in your debian package. Each line specifies the full path of a config file.



See https://manpages.debian.org/testing/dpkg-dev/deb-conffiles.5.en.html



The result of including this will be that these files are registered on the system as config files and will not be automatically overwritten.




I've not used CPackDeb myself, but there's a reference for how to add files to control.tar.gz here:



https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.0/module/CPackDeb.html?highlight=conffiles



set(CPACK_DEBIAN_PACKAGE_CONTROL_EXTRA
"${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR/prerm;$CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR/postrm")






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited yesterday

























answered yesterday









Philip CoulingPhilip Couling

2,5791123




2,5791123












  • ... assuming you're using dh_installdeb which I've never bothered to. But okay I'll edit

    – Philip Couling
    yesterday











  • You’re making a few assumptions which are liable to confuse readers. If building from source, you hardly ever manipulate DEBIAN directly. If you write a conffiles in your control directory, it won’t be taken into account in debhelper compatibility level 12 or later. Of course if you don’t use debhelper then you need to deal with things yourself but that’s not what I’d expect new packagers to do...

    – Stephen Kitt
    yesterday












  • Aha, so I am indeed not packaging correctly. Any idea how to achieve that behavior with CPack? Will look into CPACK_DEBIAN_PACKAGE_CONTROL_EXTRA.

    – user907323
    yesterday












  • I can see the ambiguity with debhelper's nomenclature. I've edited to quantify the use of the DEBIAN directory for dpkg-deb although I note a conffiles file for installation into DEBIAN is also correct for debhelper where it does not automatically find config files. The underlying file format doesn't use the name DEBIAN and I was unaware of any name collisions with other packaging utilities.

    – Philip Couling
    yesterday












  • @Philip thanks, your answer seems OK to me now. The assumptions I was referring to were that (1) that users were building binary packages directly, using dpkg-deb (which you’ve made explicit) and (2) that conffiles is a universal solution — as mentioned above, in the current compatibility level (12), debhelper will ignore any conffiles provided in the packaging.

    – Stephen Kitt
    yesterday

















  • ... assuming you're using dh_installdeb which I've never bothered to. But okay I'll edit

    – Philip Couling
    yesterday











  • You’re making a few assumptions which are liable to confuse readers. If building from source, you hardly ever manipulate DEBIAN directly. If you write a conffiles in your control directory, it won’t be taken into account in debhelper compatibility level 12 or later. Of course if you don’t use debhelper then you need to deal with things yourself but that’s not what I’d expect new packagers to do...

    – Stephen Kitt
    yesterday












  • Aha, so I am indeed not packaging correctly. Any idea how to achieve that behavior with CPack? Will look into CPACK_DEBIAN_PACKAGE_CONTROL_EXTRA.

    – user907323
    yesterday












  • I can see the ambiguity with debhelper's nomenclature. I've edited to quantify the use of the DEBIAN directory for dpkg-deb although I note a conffiles file for installation into DEBIAN is also correct for debhelper where it does not automatically find config files. The underlying file format doesn't use the name DEBIAN and I was unaware of any name collisions with other packaging utilities.

    – Philip Couling
    yesterday












  • @Philip thanks, your answer seems OK to me now. The assumptions I was referring to were that (1) that users were building binary packages directly, using dpkg-deb (which you’ve made explicit) and (2) that conffiles is a universal solution — as mentioned above, in the current compatibility level (12), debhelper will ignore any conffiles provided in the packaging.

    – Stephen Kitt
    yesterday
















... assuming you're using dh_installdeb which I've never bothered to. But okay I'll edit

– Philip Couling
yesterday





... assuming you're using dh_installdeb which I've never bothered to. But okay I'll edit

– Philip Couling
yesterday













You’re making a few assumptions which are liable to confuse readers. If building from source, you hardly ever manipulate DEBIAN directly. If you write a conffiles in your control directory, it won’t be taken into account in debhelper compatibility level 12 or later. Of course if you don’t use debhelper then you need to deal with things yourself but that’s not what I’d expect new packagers to do...

– Stephen Kitt
yesterday






You’re making a few assumptions which are liable to confuse readers. If building from source, you hardly ever manipulate DEBIAN directly. If you write a conffiles in your control directory, it won’t be taken into account in debhelper compatibility level 12 or later. Of course if you don’t use debhelper then you need to deal with things yourself but that’s not what I’d expect new packagers to do...

– Stephen Kitt
yesterday














Aha, so I am indeed not packaging correctly. Any idea how to achieve that behavior with CPack? Will look into CPACK_DEBIAN_PACKAGE_CONTROL_EXTRA.

– user907323
yesterday






Aha, so I am indeed not packaging correctly. Any idea how to achieve that behavior with CPack? Will look into CPACK_DEBIAN_PACKAGE_CONTROL_EXTRA.

– user907323
yesterday














I can see the ambiguity with debhelper's nomenclature. I've edited to quantify the use of the DEBIAN directory for dpkg-deb although I note a conffiles file for installation into DEBIAN is also correct for debhelper where it does not automatically find config files. The underlying file format doesn't use the name DEBIAN and I was unaware of any name collisions with other packaging utilities.

– Philip Couling
yesterday






I can see the ambiguity with debhelper's nomenclature. I've edited to quantify the use of the DEBIAN directory for dpkg-deb although I note a conffiles file for installation into DEBIAN is also correct for debhelper where it does not automatically find config files. The underlying file format doesn't use the name DEBIAN and I was unaware of any name collisions with other packaging utilities.

– Philip Couling
yesterday














@Philip thanks, your answer seems OK to me now. The assumptions I was referring to were that (1) that users were building binary packages directly, using dpkg-deb (which you’ve made explicit) and (2) that conffiles is a universal solution — as mentioned above, in the current compatibility level (12), debhelper will ignore any conffiles provided in the packaging.

– Stephen Kitt
yesterday





@Philip thanks, your answer seems OK to me now. The assumptions I was referring to were that (1) that users were building binary packages directly, using dpkg-deb (which you’ve made explicit) and (2) that conffiles is a universal solution — as mentioned above, in the current compatibility level (12), debhelper will ignore any conffiles provided in the packaging.

– Stephen Kitt
yesterday

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f511862%2fapt-update-always-overrides-old-config-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-apt, deb

Popular posts from this blog

Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god existsWord for having a definite opinion while simultaneously withholding judgment?What's the opposite of “newcomer? Is ”veteran" OK?What do you call an “atheist” who might believe in an afterlife?What's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Word for someone who dismisses contrary opinions as irrational?Somone who thinks they are overly special/out of the ordinaryIs there a word, phrase or idiom for “a person who is incapable of thinking about the future”?The belief that a god is human-likeA word for a non-famous person/thing you have heard a lot aboutAdjective for a person who enjoys taking care of their appearance

2017 IndyCar Series Contents Series news Teams and drivers Schedule Season summary Footnotes References External links Navigation menu"INDYCAR: Initial 2018 bodywork concepts unveiled"the original"IndyCar confirms switch to Performance Friction brakes in 2017""AJ Foyt Racing will switch to Chevy"the original"Carlos Munoz, Conor Daly will drive for AJ Foyt Racing""Zach Veach's Indy 500 Debut Confirmed with Foyt""No mass exodus from Honda after Ganassi switch""Ex-F1 driver Sato joins Andretti Autosport for 2017 IndyCar season""IndyCar's Ryan Hunter-Reay, sponsor DHL paired through 2020""hhgregg and Andretti Autosport announce partnership for key races in 2016""INDYCAR: Rossi re-signs with Andretti"the original"McLaren Formula 1 - Fernando Alonso to race at Indy 500 with McLaren, Honda and Andretti Autosport""Shank will finally take part in Indy 500 with Harvey, Andretti | MotorSportsTalk""Andretti adds Jack Harvey to Indy 500 field""Ganassi switches to Honda power for 2017""INDYCAR: Chilton returns to Ganassi"the original"IndyCar silly season: Who's going where in 2017?""INDYCAR: Kanaan, NTT Data return to Ganassi"the original"Kimball to remain at Ganassi for 2017""Coyne confirms Bourdais for 2017 IndyCar season""Davison to sub for Bourdais in Indy 500"the original"Gutierrez confirmed for Detroit IndyCar debut""Gutierrez returns with Coyne for rest of 2017 season""Vautier to drive for Coyne at Texas"the original"INDYCAR: Coyne confirms Jones for 2017"the original"Pippa Mann returns to Coyne for Indy 500""Karam, Dreyer & Reinbold teaming up again for Indianapolis 500""Pigot to return to Ed Carpenter Racing""Hildebrand confirmed as full-time Ed Carpenter driver""Veach to replace injured Hildebrand at Barber"the originalNew Team Harding Racing Enters Chaves for 101st Indianapolis 500"Juncos Racing Announces Entry in 101st Running of the Indianapolis 500 :: Juncos Racing""Juncos confirms Pigot for Indy 500""Saavedra confirmed in Juncos' second 500 entry"the original"Lazier confirms Indy 500 run after son's USF2000 debut"the original"Claman DeMelo to race for RLLR at Sonoma"the original"Rahal signs Servia and ace engineer for 2017""IndyCar: Aleshin returns with Schmidt"the original"Aleshin replaced by Saavedra for Toronto""Jack Harvey will pilot SPM No. 7 car at Watkins Glen, Sonoma""Jay Howard confirmed in Tony Stewart's supported SPM Indy entry""INDYCAR: Newgarden to wave the flag at Penske"the original"Pagenaud opts for No. 1 in 2017"the original"Penske confirms Newgarden for 2017""Montoya to stay with Team Penske in 2017""Target leaving IndyCar after 27 seasons with Chip Ganassi""Cavin: IndyCar could see complete driver/team shakeup in 2017""End of the road for KV Racing?""KV Racing confirms closure, equipment sold to Juncos""Juncos confirms IndyCar Series entry"the original"Juncos readies IndyCar program, aims for '17 500"the original"Harding Racing to add Texas, Pocono to schedule"the original"Sato signs with Andretti Autosport for 2017""INDYCAR: Aleshin in Doubt at SPM"the original"Long Beach notebook: JR Hildebrand breaks hand""Hildebrand cleared to return at Phoenix"the original"Bourdais to undergo surgery on multiple fractures""Aleshin loses Schmidt Peterson IndyCar ride""Saavedra in at SPM for Pocono, Gateway"the original"Bourdais to make return at Gateway"the original"The IndyCar Grand Prix no longer is sponsored by Angie's List""2017 IndyCar Series rulebook""2017 Verizon IndyCar Series Official Rulebook"Official websiteeeeee

What was this official D&D 3.5e Lovecraft-flavored rulebook?What was this set of RPG tools called?As a first-time DM should I let my players play complex character classes and roles?Nymph's Kiss and the RelationshipWhat was the name of this Cleric Prestige Class that shapes metal with its bare hands?Are the 3.5e Dragonlance books third party or official works?What's up with the domain Vile Darkness?What was this 80s book about RPGs?What was the name of this Werewolf band?What book had Rituals to “upgrade” animal companions to keep them viable at higher levels?What was this RPG that had rules for player-owned businesses?