how to restrict users not to login to root by using sudo -i and sudo su - and other if exists [duplicate] The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsPreventing other users from viewing my filesRestrict certain command optionsHow to restrict some commands for admin in Linux(CentOS)How to add a user to sudoers file?How do I restart apache as non-root (using a git-hook)?Can edit file as root, but not using sudoAllow a user to view the home directory of other users via sudoHow to stop regular users from Switching UsersWhat is the best way to add a user to the sudoer group?Difference between sudo user and root useradding a sudoer in debiansudo does not work with database stored usersDoes sudo restrict on which users can acquire superuser privileges?

How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time

Can each chord in a progression create its own key?

Can the Right Ascension and Argument of Perigee of a spacecraft's orbit keep varying by themselves with time?

Student Loan from years ago pops up and is taking my salary

Do warforged have souls?

My body leaves; my core can stay

"is" operation returns false with ndarray.data attribute, even though two array objects have same id

different output for groups and groups USERNAME after adding a username to a group

How did the audience guess the pentatonic scale in Bobby McFerrin's presentation?

Loose spokes after only a few rides

How do spell lists change if the party levels up without taking a long rest?

Store Dynamic-accessible hidden metadata in a cell

Example of compact Riemannian manifold with only one geodesic.

Does Parliament hold absolute power in the UK?

ELI5: Why do they say that Israel would have been the fourth country to land a spacecraft on the Moon and why do they call it low cost?

Sort list of array linked objects by keys and values

Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit

Am I ethically obligated to go into work on an off day if the reason is sudden?

60's-70's movie: home appliances revolting against the owners

What information about me do stores get via my credit card?

Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?

Drawing vertical/oblique lines in Metrical tree (tikz-qtree, tipa)

Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments

Simulating Exploding Dice



how to restrict users not to login to root by using sudo -i and sudo su - and other if exists [duplicate]



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsPreventing other users from viewing my filesRestrict certain command optionsHow to restrict some commands for admin in Linux(CentOS)How to add a user to sudoers file?How do I restart apache as non-root (using a git-hook)?Can edit file as root, but not using sudoAllow a user to view the home directory of other users via sudoHow to stop regular users from Switching UsersWhat is the best way to add a user to the sudoer group?Difference between sudo user and root useradding a sudoer in debiansudo does not work with database stored usersDoes sudo restrict on which users can acquire superuser privileges?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3
















This question already has an answer here:



  • Preventing other users from viewing my files [closed]

    3 answers



I have tried to restrict user by editing sudoers file M ALL=!/bin/su. I am able to restrict sudo su - but not sudo -i.










share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by sourcejedi, Jeff Schaller, Rui F Ribeiro, jayhendren, G-Man Jan 24 '18 at 1:01


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • 2





    A few problems with this approach are mentioned here: unix.stackexchange.com/questions/392483/…

    – Guy
    Jan 23 '18 at 11:27











  • If you're trying to ensure a user can't get a root shell, you need to check that every command you allow users to run via sudo doesn't have a way to create a shell. For example, most editors have a shell escape to allow a user to run a shell. You also need to make sure any command you do allow users to run via sudo doesn't have any holes such as using environment variables controlled by the user.

    – Andrew Henle
    Jan 23 '18 at 11:32











  • I want to allow him in all other activities where as he has to run scripts but not to login as root.

    – mmk_ind
    Jan 23 '18 at 11:51






  • 3





    A seasoned user will know how to get around those limitations easily. They are mere annoyances. I would refine better the security model defining wether certain users need or not to have root access.

    – Rui F Ribeiro
    Jan 23 '18 at 11:53












  • Trivial to get around ALL=!/bin/su. See: sudo su ## Permission denied but then ln -s /bin/su /tmp/ouch; sudo /tmp/ouch ## Succeeds

    – roaima
    Jan 23 '18 at 12:02


















3
















This question already has an answer here:



  • Preventing other users from viewing my files [closed]

    3 answers



I have tried to restrict user by editing sudoers file M ALL=!/bin/su. I am able to restrict sudo su - but not sudo -i.










share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by sourcejedi, Jeff Schaller, Rui F Ribeiro, jayhendren, G-Man Jan 24 '18 at 1:01


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • 2





    A few problems with this approach are mentioned here: unix.stackexchange.com/questions/392483/…

    – Guy
    Jan 23 '18 at 11:27











  • If you're trying to ensure a user can't get a root shell, you need to check that every command you allow users to run via sudo doesn't have a way to create a shell. For example, most editors have a shell escape to allow a user to run a shell. You also need to make sure any command you do allow users to run via sudo doesn't have any holes such as using environment variables controlled by the user.

    – Andrew Henle
    Jan 23 '18 at 11:32











  • I want to allow him in all other activities where as he has to run scripts but not to login as root.

    – mmk_ind
    Jan 23 '18 at 11:51






  • 3





    A seasoned user will know how to get around those limitations easily. They are mere annoyances. I would refine better the security model defining wether certain users need or not to have root access.

    – Rui F Ribeiro
    Jan 23 '18 at 11:53












  • Trivial to get around ALL=!/bin/su. See: sudo su ## Permission denied but then ln -s /bin/su /tmp/ouch; sudo /tmp/ouch ## Succeeds

    – roaima
    Jan 23 '18 at 12:02














3












3








3









This question already has an answer here:



  • Preventing other users from viewing my files [closed]

    3 answers



I have tried to restrict user by editing sudoers file M ALL=!/bin/su. I am able to restrict sudo su - but not sudo -i.










share|improve this question

















This question already has an answer here:



  • Preventing other users from viewing my files [closed]

    3 answers



I have tried to restrict user by editing sudoers file M ALL=!/bin/su. I am able to restrict sudo su - but not sudo -i.





This question already has an answer here:



  • Preventing other users from viewing my files [closed]

    3 answers







sudo su not-root-user account-restrictions






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 23 '18 at 11:49









roaima

46.2k758124




46.2k758124










asked Jan 23 '18 at 11:03









mmk_indmmk_ind

1612




1612




marked as duplicate by sourcejedi, Jeff Schaller, Rui F Ribeiro, jayhendren, G-Man Jan 24 '18 at 1:01


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by sourcejedi, Jeff Schaller, Rui F Ribeiro, jayhendren, G-Man Jan 24 '18 at 1:01


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









  • 2





    A few problems with this approach are mentioned here: unix.stackexchange.com/questions/392483/…

    – Guy
    Jan 23 '18 at 11:27











  • If you're trying to ensure a user can't get a root shell, you need to check that every command you allow users to run via sudo doesn't have a way to create a shell. For example, most editors have a shell escape to allow a user to run a shell. You also need to make sure any command you do allow users to run via sudo doesn't have any holes such as using environment variables controlled by the user.

    – Andrew Henle
    Jan 23 '18 at 11:32











  • I want to allow him in all other activities where as he has to run scripts but not to login as root.

    – mmk_ind
    Jan 23 '18 at 11:51






  • 3





    A seasoned user will know how to get around those limitations easily. They are mere annoyances. I would refine better the security model defining wether certain users need or not to have root access.

    – Rui F Ribeiro
    Jan 23 '18 at 11:53












  • Trivial to get around ALL=!/bin/su. See: sudo su ## Permission denied but then ln -s /bin/su /tmp/ouch; sudo /tmp/ouch ## Succeeds

    – roaima
    Jan 23 '18 at 12:02













  • 2





    A few problems with this approach are mentioned here: unix.stackexchange.com/questions/392483/…

    – Guy
    Jan 23 '18 at 11:27











  • If you're trying to ensure a user can't get a root shell, you need to check that every command you allow users to run via sudo doesn't have a way to create a shell. For example, most editors have a shell escape to allow a user to run a shell. You also need to make sure any command you do allow users to run via sudo doesn't have any holes such as using environment variables controlled by the user.

    – Andrew Henle
    Jan 23 '18 at 11:32











  • I want to allow him in all other activities where as he has to run scripts but not to login as root.

    – mmk_ind
    Jan 23 '18 at 11:51






  • 3





    A seasoned user will know how to get around those limitations easily. They are mere annoyances. I would refine better the security model defining wether certain users need or not to have root access.

    – Rui F Ribeiro
    Jan 23 '18 at 11:53












  • Trivial to get around ALL=!/bin/su. See: sudo su ## Permission denied but then ln -s /bin/su /tmp/ouch; sudo /tmp/ouch ## Succeeds

    – roaima
    Jan 23 '18 at 12:02








2




2





A few problems with this approach are mentioned here: unix.stackexchange.com/questions/392483/…

– Guy
Jan 23 '18 at 11:27





A few problems with this approach are mentioned here: unix.stackexchange.com/questions/392483/…

– Guy
Jan 23 '18 at 11:27













If you're trying to ensure a user can't get a root shell, you need to check that every command you allow users to run via sudo doesn't have a way to create a shell. For example, most editors have a shell escape to allow a user to run a shell. You also need to make sure any command you do allow users to run via sudo doesn't have any holes such as using environment variables controlled by the user.

– Andrew Henle
Jan 23 '18 at 11:32





If you're trying to ensure a user can't get a root shell, you need to check that every command you allow users to run via sudo doesn't have a way to create a shell. For example, most editors have a shell escape to allow a user to run a shell. You also need to make sure any command you do allow users to run via sudo doesn't have any holes such as using environment variables controlled by the user.

– Andrew Henle
Jan 23 '18 at 11:32













I want to allow him in all other activities where as he has to run scripts but not to login as root.

– mmk_ind
Jan 23 '18 at 11:51





I want to allow him in all other activities where as he has to run scripts but not to login as root.

– mmk_ind
Jan 23 '18 at 11:51




3




3





A seasoned user will know how to get around those limitations easily. They are mere annoyances. I would refine better the security model defining wether certain users need or not to have root access.

– Rui F Ribeiro
Jan 23 '18 at 11:53






A seasoned user will know how to get around those limitations easily. They are mere annoyances. I would refine better the security model defining wether certain users need or not to have root access.

– Rui F Ribeiro
Jan 23 '18 at 11:53














Trivial to get around ALL=!/bin/su. See: sudo su ## Permission denied but then ln -s /bin/su /tmp/ouch; sudo /tmp/ouch ## Succeeds

– roaima
Jan 23 '18 at 12:02






Trivial to get around ALL=!/bin/su. See: sudo su ## Permission denied but then ln -s /bin/su /tmp/ouch; sudo /tmp/ouch ## Succeeds

– roaima
Jan 23 '18 at 12:02











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














For your original question, you will need to exclude /bin/bash (or whatever is defined as the user's shell in /etc/passwd), like so:



tomk ALL= ALL,!/bin/su,!/bin/bash


However(!!!), as stated already in the comments to your question, even though this will deny the user from running sudo -s or sudo -i, it will not really prevent him/her from getting an interactive shell as root.



From man sudoers:




Limitations of the ‘!’ operator



It is generally not effective to “subtract” commands from ALL using the ‘!’ operator. A user can trivially circumvent this by copying the desired command to a different name and then executing that.
For example:



bill ALL = ALL, !SU, !SHELLS


Doesn't really prevent bill from running the commands listed in SU or SHELLS since he can simply copy those commands to a different name, or use a shell escape from an editor or other program. There‐
fore, these kind of restrictions should be considered advisory at best (and reinforced by policy).



In general, if a user has sudo ALL there is nothing to prevent them from creating their own program that gives them a root shell (or making their own copy of a shell) regardless of any ‘!’ elements in
the user specification.







share|improve this answer





























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    For your original question, you will need to exclude /bin/bash (or whatever is defined as the user's shell in /etc/passwd), like so:



    tomk ALL= ALL,!/bin/su,!/bin/bash


    However(!!!), as stated already in the comments to your question, even though this will deny the user from running sudo -s or sudo -i, it will not really prevent him/her from getting an interactive shell as root.



    From man sudoers:




    Limitations of the ‘!’ operator



    It is generally not effective to “subtract” commands from ALL using the ‘!’ operator. A user can trivially circumvent this by copying the desired command to a different name and then executing that.
    For example:



    bill ALL = ALL, !SU, !SHELLS


    Doesn't really prevent bill from running the commands listed in SU or SHELLS since he can simply copy those commands to a different name, or use a shell escape from an editor or other program. There‐
    fore, these kind of restrictions should be considered advisory at best (and reinforced by policy).



    In general, if a user has sudo ALL there is nothing to prevent them from creating their own program that gives them a root shell (or making their own copy of a shell) regardless of any ‘!’ elements in
    the user specification.







    share|improve this answer



























      1














      For your original question, you will need to exclude /bin/bash (or whatever is defined as the user's shell in /etc/passwd), like so:



      tomk ALL= ALL,!/bin/su,!/bin/bash


      However(!!!), as stated already in the comments to your question, even though this will deny the user from running sudo -s or sudo -i, it will not really prevent him/her from getting an interactive shell as root.



      From man sudoers:




      Limitations of the ‘!’ operator



      It is generally not effective to “subtract” commands from ALL using the ‘!’ operator. A user can trivially circumvent this by copying the desired command to a different name and then executing that.
      For example:



      bill ALL = ALL, !SU, !SHELLS


      Doesn't really prevent bill from running the commands listed in SU or SHELLS since he can simply copy those commands to a different name, or use a shell escape from an editor or other program. There‐
      fore, these kind of restrictions should be considered advisory at best (and reinforced by policy).



      In general, if a user has sudo ALL there is nothing to prevent them from creating their own program that gives them a root shell (or making their own copy of a shell) regardless of any ‘!’ elements in
      the user specification.







      share|improve this answer

























        1












        1








        1







        For your original question, you will need to exclude /bin/bash (or whatever is defined as the user's shell in /etc/passwd), like so:



        tomk ALL= ALL,!/bin/su,!/bin/bash


        However(!!!), as stated already in the comments to your question, even though this will deny the user from running sudo -s or sudo -i, it will not really prevent him/her from getting an interactive shell as root.



        From man sudoers:




        Limitations of the ‘!’ operator



        It is generally not effective to “subtract” commands from ALL using the ‘!’ operator. A user can trivially circumvent this by copying the desired command to a different name and then executing that.
        For example:



        bill ALL = ALL, !SU, !SHELLS


        Doesn't really prevent bill from running the commands listed in SU or SHELLS since he can simply copy those commands to a different name, or use a shell escape from an editor or other program. There‐
        fore, these kind of restrictions should be considered advisory at best (and reinforced by policy).



        In general, if a user has sudo ALL there is nothing to prevent them from creating their own program that gives them a root shell (or making their own copy of a shell) regardless of any ‘!’ elements in
        the user specification.







        share|improve this answer













        For your original question, you will need to exclude /bin/bash (or whatever is defined as the user's shell in /etc/passwd), like so:



        tomk ALL= ALL,!/bin/su,!/bin/bash


        However(!!!), as stated already in the comments to your question, even though this will deny the user from running sudo -s or sudo -i, it will not really prevent him/her from getting an interactive shell as root.



        From man sudoers:




        Limitations of the ‘!’ operator



        It is generally not effective to “subtract” commands from ALL using the ‘!’ operator. A user can trivially circumvent this by copying the desired command to a different name and then executing that.
        For example:



        bill ALL = ALL, !SU, !SHELLS


        Doesn't really prevent bill from running the commands listed in SU or SHELLS since he can simply copy those commands to a different name, or use a shell escape from an editor or other program. There‐
        fore, these kind of restrictions should be considered advisory at best (and reinforced by policy).



        In general, if a user has sudo ALL there is nothing to prevent them from creating their own program that gives them a root shell (or making their own copy of a shell) regardless of any ‘!’ elements in
        the user specification.








        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Jan 23 '18 at 13:11









        Tom KlinoTom Klino

        410719




        410719













            -account-restrictions, not-root-user, su, sudo

            Popular posts from this blog

            Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god existsWord for having a definite opinion while simultaneously withholding judgment?What's the opposite of “newcomer? Is ”veteran" OK?What do you call an “atheist” who might believe in an afterlife?What's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Word for someone who dismisses contrary opinions as irrational?Somone who thinks they are overly special/out of the ordinaryIs there a word, phrase or idiom for “a person who is incapable of thinking about the future”?The belief that a god is human-likeA word for a non-famous person/thing you have heard a lot aboutAdjective for a person who enjoys taking care of their appearance

            What was this official D&D 3.5e Lovecraft-flavored rulebook?What was this set of RPG tools called?As a first-time DM should I let my players play complex character classes and roles?Nymph's Kiss and the RelationshipWhat was the name of this Cleric Prestige Class that shapes metal with its bare hands?Are the 3.5e Dragonlance books third party or official works?What's up with the domain Vile Darkness?What was this 80s book about RPGs?What was the name of this Werewolf band?What book had Rituals to “upgrade” animal companions to keep them viable at higher levels?What was this RPG that had rules for player-owned businesses?

            2017 IndyCar Series Contents Series news Teams and drivers Schedule Season summary Footnotes References External links Navigation menu"INDYCAR: Initial 2018 bodywork concepts unveiled"the original"IndyCar confirms switch to Performance Friction brakes in 2017""AJ Foyt Racing will switch to Chevy"the original"Carlos Munoz, Conor Daly will drive for AJ Foyt Racing""Zach Veach's Indy 500 Debut Confirmed with Foyt""No mass exodus from Honda after Ganassi switch""Ex-F1 driver Sato joins Andretti Autosport for 2017 IndyCar season""IndyCar's Ryan Hunter-Reay, sponsor DHL paired through 2020""hhgregg and Andretti Autosport announce partnership for key races in 2016""INDYCAR: Rossi re-signs with Andretti"the original"McLaren Formula 1 - Fernando Alonso to race at Indy 500 with McLaren, Honda and Andretti Autosport""Shank will finally take part in Indy 500 with Harvey, Andretti | MotorSportsTalk""Andretti adds Jack Harvey to Indy 500 field""Ganassi switches to Honda power for 2017""INDYCAR: Chilton returns to Ganassi"the original"IndyCar silly season: Who's going where in 2017?""INDYCAR: Kanaan, NTT Data return to Ganassi"the original"Kimball to remain at Ganassi for 2017""Coyne confirms Bourdais for 2017 IndyCar season""Davison to sub for Bourdais in Indy 500"the original"Gutierrez confirmed for Detroit IndyCar debut""Gutierrez returns with Coyne for rest of 2017 season""Vautier to drive for Coyne at Texas"the original"INDYCAR: Coyne confirms Jones for 2017"the original"Pippa Mann returns to Coyne for Indy 500""Karam, Dreyer & Reinbold teaming up again for Indianapolis 500""Pigot to return to Ed Carpenter Racing""Hildebrand confirmed as full-time Ed Carpenter driver""Veach to replace injured Hildebrand at Barber"the originalNew Team Harding Racing Enters Chaves for 101st Indianapolis 500"Juncos Racing Announces Entry in 101st Running of the Indianapolis 500 :: Juncos Racing""Juncos confirms Pigot for Indy 500""Saavedra confirmed in Juncos' second 500 entry"the original"Lazier confirms Indy 500 run after son's USF2000 debut"the original"Claman DeMelo to race for RLLR at Sonoma"the original"Rahal signs Servia and ace engineer for 2017""IndyCar: Aleshin returns with Schmidt"the original"Aleshin replaced by Saavedra for Toronto""Jack Harvey will pilot SPM No. 7 car at Watkins Glen, Sonoma""Jay Howard confirmed in Tony Stewart's supported SPM Indy entry""INDYCAR: Newgarden to wave the flag at Penske"the original"Pagenaud opts for No. 1 in 2017"the original"Penske confirms Newgarden for 2017""Montoya to stay with Team Penske in 2017""Target leaving IndyCar after 27 seasons with Chip Ganassi""Cavin: IndyCar could see complete driver/team shakeup in 2017""End of the road for KV Racing?""KV Racing confirms closure, equipment sold to Juncos""Juncos confirms IndyCar Series entry"the original"Juncos readies IndyCar program, aims for '17 500"the original"Harding Racing to add Texas, Pocono to schedule"the original"Sato signs with Andretti Autosport for 2017""INDYCAR: Aleshin in Doubt at SPM"the original"Long Beach notebook: JR Hildebrand breaks hand""Hildebrand cleared to return at Phoenix"the original"Bourdais to undergo surgery on multiple fractures""Aleshin loses Schmidt Peterson IndyCar ride""Saavedra in at SPM for Pocono, Gateway"the original"Bourdais to make return at Gateway"the original"The IndyCar Grand Prix no longer is sponsored by Angie's List""2017 IndyCar Series rulebook""2017 Verizon IndyCar Series Official Rulebook"Official websiteeeeee