Is there any way to damage Intellect Devourer(s) when already within a creature's skull?Can Blindsight “See” Through Walls, Floors, And Ceilings?Does a fireball ignore total cover?Can a PC use a mirror or other sight enhancer to use sacred flame at a target around a corner?What happens when a creature possessed by an intellect devourer is true polymorphed?Can Mirror Image effect be negated with a single Sacred Flame?Does Sacred Flame or Firebolt do more damage on average to a Shadow over an arbitrary but finite number of rounds?Vicious Mockery on non-humanoid targets?Does the Bodak's Death Gaze affect someone looking through their familiar's eyes?How can I get around a dragon’s blindsight?Could a Warlock with Ghostly Gaze and Sacred Flame attack through a wall?How do targeting and line of sight for spells work in regards to allies?Is a pregnant creature considered a single entity for spells such as Banishment?

Explaining alternative travel routes when going to the USA

If magnesium reacts with oxygen to produce magnesium oxide only on the application of heat, then why isn't it categorised as an endothermic reaction?

What is this called? Old film camera viewer?

Creepy dinosaur pc game identification

What is Cash Advance APR?

What will be next at the bottom row and why?

Does Doodling or Improvising on the Piano Have Any Benefits?

Is preaching recommended or mandatory to a temple priest?

Angel of Condemnation - Exile creature with second ability

How can I block email signup overlays or javascript popups in Safari?

How could a planet have erratic days?

What percentage of fillings performed today are done with mercury amalgam?

What does routing an IP address mean?

How much character growth crosses the line into breaking the character

What is going wrong in this circuit which supposedly should step down AC to arduino friendly voltage?

Non-trope happy ending?

How does the math work for Perception checks?

Why is it that I can sometimes guess the next note?

What changes for testers when they are testing in agile environments?

Infinite dials to reset ever?

Is there any references on the tensor product of presentable (1-)categories?

Aragorn's "guise" in the Orthanc Stone

Is aluminum electrical wire used on aircraft?

Has any country ever had 2 former presidents in jail simultaneously?



Is there any way to damage Intellect Devourer(s) when already within a creature's skull?


Can Blindsight “See” Through Walls, Floors, And Ceilings?Does a fireball ignore total cover?Can a PC use a mirror or other sight enhancer to use sacred flame at a target around a corner?What happens when a creature possessed by an intellect devourer is true polymorphed?Can Mirror Image effect be negated with a single Sacred Flame?Does Sacred Flame or Firebolt do more damage on average to a Shadow over an arbitrary but finite number of rounds?Vicious Mockery on non-humanoid targets?Does the Bodak's Death Gaze affect someone looking through their familiar's eyes?How can I get around a dragon’s blindsight?Could a Warlock with Ghostly Gaze and Sacred Flame attack through a wall?How do targeting and line of sight for spells work in regards to allies?Is a pregnant creature considered a single entity for spells such as Banishment?













12












$begingroup$


An Intellect Devourer gains the following benefit from its Body Thief ability:




While inside a creature, the intellect devourer has total cover against attacks and other effects originating outside its host.




The point of this is to find a viable solution to take out multiple Intellect Devourers quickly, from inside the host, while using as little consumable resources (such as Spell Slots or Items) as possible (or none).



The closest I have gotten, thus far, is trying to attack it with either Vicious Mockery or Sacred Flame. However, both




Vicious Mockery: You unleash a string of insults laced with subtle enchantments at a creature you can see within range. If the target can hear you (though it need not understand you), it must succeed on a Wisdom saving throw or take 1d4 psychic damage and have disadvantage on the next attack roll it makes before the end of its next turn.




and




Sacred Flame: Flame-like radiance descends on a creature that you can see within range. The target must succeed on a Dexterity saving throw or take 1d8 radiant damage. The target gains no benefit from cover for this saving throw.




both specify a necessity for you to be able to see the target. The quickest, easiest (but unviable..) "solution" I have, so far, is a Celestial Warlock with Pact of the Chain using a Bat or Pseudodragon familiar, choosing to see through its senses for its Blindsight, and then casting Sacred Flame at it.



This method is thwarted by the simple fact that (both via Twitter), while Jeremy Crawford has confirmed that blindsight qualifies for anything in the D&D rules that requires you to see something (as long as its within the radius), he has also confirmed that blindsight does not beat total cover. Meaning a working solution may be somehow sharing senses with a creature that has Tremorsense. Casting Beast Sense comes to mind, but I am unaware of any Beast-type creatures with Tremorsense.



Truesight does not detect an Intellect Devourer either.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    I'd recommend removing your guesses from the question and posting them as answers (Vicious Mockery/Sacred Flame...assumptions about total cover, etc.) Just leave the question more simply at how to do this :)
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 12 at 17:28










  • $begingroup$
    Related on your suggest solution with Blindsight and Pact of the Chain: Can Blindsight “See” Through Walls, Floors, And Ceilings?
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    Mar 12 at 17:31











  • $begingroup$
    I did some reorganization to bring your Note up to the top - but I really recommend removing everything below it and posting it as an answer.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 12 at 17:35















12












$begingroup$


An Intellect Devourer gains the following benefit from its Body Thief ability:




While inside a creature, the intellect devourer has total cover against attacks and other effects originating outside its host.




The point of this is to find a viable solution to take out multiple Intellect Devourers quickly, from inside the host, while using as little consumable resources (such as Spell Slots or Items) as possible (or none).



The closest I have gotten, thus far, is trying to attack it with either Vicious Mockery or Sacred Flame. However, both




Vicious Mockery: You unleash a string of insults laced with subtle enchantments at a creature you can see within range. If the target can hear you (though it need not understand you), it must succeed on a Wisdom saving throw or take 1d4 psychic damage and have disadvantage on the next attack roll it makes before the end of its next turn.




and




Sacred Flame: Flame-like radiance descends on a creature that you can see within range. The target must succeed on a Dexterity saving throw or take 1d8 radiant damage. The target gains no benefit from cover for this saving throw.




both specify a necessity for you to be able to see the target. The quickest, easiest (but unviable..) "solution" I have, so far, is a Celestial Warlock with Pact of the Chain using a Bat or Pseudodragon familiar, choosing to see through its senses for its Blindsight, and then casting Sacred Flame at it.



This method is thwarted by the simple fact that (both via Twitter), while Jeremy Crawford has confirmed that blindsight qualifies for anything in the D&D rules that requires you to see something (as long as its within the radius), he has also confirmed that blindsight does not beat total cover. Meaning a working solution may be somehow sharing senses with a creature that has Tremorsense. Casting Beast Sense comes to mind, but I am unaware of any Beast-type creatures with Tremorsense.



Truesight does not detect an Intellect Devourer either.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    I'd recommend removing your guesses from the question and posting them as answers (Vicious Mockery/Sacred Flame...assumptions about total cover, etc.) Just leave the question more simply at how to do this :)
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 12 at 17:28










  • $begingroup$
    Related on your suggest solution with Blindsight and Pact of the Chain: Can Blindsight “See” Through Walls, Floors, And Ceilings?
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    Mar 12 at 17:31











  • $begingroup$
    I did some reorganization to bring your Note up to the top - but I really recommend removing everything below it and posting it as an answer.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 12 at 17:35













12












12








12





$begingroup$


An Intellect Devourer gains the following benefit from its Body Thief ability:




While inside a creature, the intellect devourer has total cover against attacks and other effects originating outside its host.




The point of this is to find a viable solution to take out multiple Intellect Devourers quickly, from inside the host, while using as little consumable resources (such as Spell Slots or Items) as possible (or none).



The closest I have gotten, thus far, is trying to attack it with either Vicious Mockery or Sacred Flame. However, both




Vicious Mockery: You unleash a string of insults laced with subtle enchantments at a creature you can see within range. If the target can hear you (though it need not understand you), it must succeed on a Wisdom saving throw or take 1d4 psychic damage and have disadvantage on the next attack roll it makes before the end of its next turn.




and




Sacred Flame: Flame-like radiance descends on a creature that you can see within range. The target must succeed on a Dexterity saving throw or take 1d8 radiant damage. The target gains no benefit from cover for this saving throw.




both specify a necessity for you to be able to see the target. The quickest, easiest (but unviable..) "solution" I have, so far, is a Celestial Warlock with Pact of the Chain using a Bat or Pseudodragon familiar, choosing to see through its senses for its Blindsight, and then casting Sacred Flame at it.



This method is thwarted by the simple fact that (both via Twitter), while Jeremy Crawford has confirmed that blindsight qualifies for anything in the D&D rules that requires you to see something (as long as its within the radius), he has also confirmed that blindsight does not beat total cover. Meaning a working solution may be somehow sharing senses with a creature that has Tremorsense. Casting Beast Sense comes to mind, but I am unaware of any Beast-type creatures with Tremorsense.



Truesight does not detect an Intellect Devourer either.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




An Intellect Devourer gains the following benefit from its Body Thief ability:




While inside a creature, the intellect devourer has total cover against attacks and other effects originating outside its host.




The point of this is to find a viable solution to take out multiple Intellect Devourers quickly, from inside the host, while using as little consumable resources (such as Spell Slots or Items) as possible (or none).



The closest I have gotten, thus far, is trying to attack it with either Vicious Mockery or Sacred Flame. However, both




Vicious Mockery: You unleash a string of insults laced with subtle enchantments at a creature you can see within range. If the target can hear you (though it need not understand you), it must succeed on a Wisdom saving throw or take 1d4 psychic damage and have disadvantage on the next attack roll it makes before the end of its next turn.




and




Sacred Flame: Flame-like radiance descends on a creature that you can see within range. The target must succeed on a Dexterity saving throw or take 1d8 radiant damage. The target gains no benefit from cover for this saving throw.




both specify a necessity for you to be able to see the target. The quickest, easiest (but unviable..) "solution" I have, so far, is a Celestial Warlock with Pact of the Chain using a Bat or Pseudodragon familiar, choosing to see through its senses for its Blindsight, and then casting Sacred Flame at it.



This method is thwarted by the simple fact that (both via Twitter), while Jeremy Crawford has confirmed that blindsight qualifies for anything in the D&D rules that requires you to see something (as long as its within the radius), he has also confirmed that blindsight does not beat total cover. Meaning a working solution may be somehow sharing senses with a creature that has Tremorsense. Casting Beast Sense comes to mind, but I am unaware of any Beast-type creatures with Tremorsense.



Truesight does not detect an Intellect Devourer either.







dnd-5e monsters






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 12 at 17:35









NautArch

60.7k8217402




60.7k8217402










asked Mar 12 at 17:18









Xepheus MessoremXepheus Messorem

814




814











  • $begingroup$
    I'd recommend removing your guesses from the question and posting them as answers (Vicious Mockery/Sacred Flame...assumptions about total cover, etc.) Just leave the question more simply at how to do this :)
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 12 at 17:28










  • $begingroup$
    Related on your suggest solution with Blindsight and Pact of the Chain: Can Blindsight “See” Through Walls, Floors, And Ceilings?
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    Mar 12 at 17:31











  • $begingroup$
    I did some reorganization to bring your Note up to the top - but I really recommend removing everything below it and posting it as an answer.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 12 at 17:35
















  • $begingroup$
    I'd recommend removing your guesses from the question and posting them as answers (Vicious Mockery/Sacred Flame...assumptions about total cover, etc.) Just leave the question more simply at how to do this :)
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 12 at 17:28










  • $begingroup$
    Related on your suggest solution with Blindsight and Pact of the Chain: Can Blindsight “See” Through Walls, Floors, And Ceilings?
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    Mar 12 at 17:31











  • $begingroup$
    I did some reorganization to bring your Note up to the top - but I really recommend removing everything below it and posting it as an answer.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 12 at 17:35















$begingroup$
I'd recommend removing your guesses from the question and posting them as answers (Vicious Mockery/Sacred Flame...assumptions about total cover, etc.) Just leave the question more simply at how to do this :)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Mar 12 at 17:28




$begingroup$
I'd recommend removing your guesses from the question and posting them as answers (Vicious Mockery/Sacred Flame...assumptions about total cover, etc.) Just leave the question more simply at how to do this :)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Mar 12 at 17:28












$begingroup$
Related on your suggest solution with Blindsight and Pact of the Chain: Can Blindsight “See” Through Walls, Floors, And Ceilings?
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
Mar 12 at 17:31





$begingroup$
Related on your suggest solution with Blindsight and Pact of the Chain: Can Blindsight “See” Through Walls, Floors, And Ceilings?
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
Mar 12 at 17:31













$begingroup$
I did some reorganization to bring your Note up to the top - but I really recommend removing everything below it and posting it as an answer.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Mar 12 at 17:35




$begingroup$
I did some reorganization to bring your Note up to the top - but I really recommend removing everything below it and posting it as an answer.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Mar 12 at 17:35










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















13












$begingroup$

You are going to have to see the Intellect Devourer.



As far as I know, sacred flame is the only spell that can get around total cover as most spells follow the targeting rules that state:




To target something, you must have a clear path to it, so it can't be behind total cover.




Sacred flame is able to ignore cover completely, but only because it is a specific exception to this general rule. Because sacred flame is the only option, you are going to need to find a way to see the intellect devourer.



Ghostly Gaze



From what I've seen, the only option to see directly into someone's skull is to use the warlock Eldritch Invocation Ghostly Gaze (found in Xanathar's Guide to Everything):




As an action, you gain the ability to see through solid objects to a range of 30 feet.




Once you can see into the victim's skull, you can call down holy light to burn it away (i.e. cast sacred flame).



Surgery



Credit to divibisan in the comments for this suggestion, and he is absolutely right. You could surgically add a hole in the host's skull (perhaps after knocking them unconscious via the sleep spell).



There was a procedure going as far back as ancient times called trepanning that involved boring a hole in a patient's skull. Remember that the host in question's brain is already eaten, so you aren't even really at risk of damaging the original host's brain. This would allow you to get sight on the Intellect Devourer to target it with sacred flame.



However, the Intellect Devourer would not have been affected by sleep, so at any time it might...




end... [the possession] as a bonus action




... and attack.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    once you've got a hole in the target's skull, you can also send a suitably sized Familiar in (such as a tiny spider) to cast Touch ranged spells on the Intellect Devourer.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    Mar 13 at 6:37











  • $begingroup$
    +1 for ghostly gaze, that's a sweet solution
    $endgroup$
    – MiniMackie
    Mar 13 at 10:43


















7












$begingroup$

You can detect the Intellect Devourer using Detect Thoughts. However, you can't target it.



Detect Thoughts states (italics notes mine):




You can also use this spell to detect the presence of thinking creatures you can't see. When you cast the spell or as your action during the duration, you can search for thoughts within 30 feet of you. The spell can penetrate barriers, but 2 feet of rock, 2 inches of any metal other than lead, or a thin sheet of lead blocks you. You can't detect a creature with an Intelligence of 3 (Intellect Devourer has 12 INT) or lower or one that doesn't speak any language (Intellect Devourer knows Deep Speech & Telepathy).




Technically, an Intellect Devourer doesn't speak Deep Speech, and Telepathy is not really "speaking", but that's obviously not the intent of the spell.



However, the PHB states on page 205, in the chapter Spellcasting > Targeting:




A Clear Path to the Target



To target something, you must have a clear path to it, so it can't be behind total cover. If you place an area of effect at a point that you can't see and an obstruction, such as a wall, is between you and that point, the point of origin comes into being on
the near side of that obstruction.




This applies regardless of whether or not a spell requires you to see a target.




Geas



If you cast Geas on the Intellect Devourer before it enters the body (it cannot be targeted by Geas once it does), you can deal damage to it when it acts "in a manner directly counter to your instructions". Of course, this is a rather constructed example, since it takes one minute to cast Geas.

However, you could try to control an enemy politician by having a Geas'd Intellect Devourer teleport into its mind and telling the Intellect Devourer what to do. If it doesn't do so, it takes damage while inside a creature. Nevertheless, I don't think this is what you're looking for.




Arcane Archer's Piercing Arrow



The Ranger subclass Arcane Archer (XGtE, p. 28) has a Piercing Arrow feature:




Piercing Arrow. You use transmutation magic to give your arrow an ethereal quality. When you use this option, you don't make an attack roll for the attack.
Instead, the arrow shoots forward in a line, which is 1 foot wide and 30 feet long, before disappearing. The arrow passes harmlessly through objects, ignoring cover. Each creature in that line must make a Dexterity saving throw. On a failed save, a creature takes damage as if it were hit by the arrow, plus an extra 1d6 piercing damage. On a successful save, a target takes half as much damage.




One could argue that the sentence indicates that cover provided by creatures isn't ignored. However, that is neither RAW nor do I believe it is intended by the feature - considering that it otherwise also affects all creatures in that line, and taking the "theme" of the feature into account.




Wish



Needless to say, Wish can accomplish anything, but that's probably not what you're interested in either.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    This feels like it may heavily come down to DM interpretation, but if you don't mind frying the host as well, another option might be the humble Fireball.



    Fireball states that:




    The fire spreads around corners.




    This allows fireball to hit enemies in total cover so long as they are within the AoE of the spell and a path exists to the target (no hitting a target in a Resilient Sphere)



    So, if the passageways of the ears/sinuses/whatever holes the Intellect Devourer made on the way in are not entirely blocked off, it could be interpreted as a series of tiny corners which the fireball is able to work its way around and through.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      How is the fire getting into the skull?
      $endgroup$
      – NautArch
      Mar 13 at 2:40






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Going around corners doesn't mean that the fireball can affect the contents of a sealed room. So, indeed, the DM would have to rule that the devourer is accessible via ears/sinuses as you suggest. Which is quite far-fetched, at least at my table. Combined with surgery, as described in David Coffron's answer, this might work, but there may be better options if you have that level of control over the situation.
      $endgroup$
      – Phlarx
      Mar 13 at 3:46










    • $begingroup$
      Thus the "heavily down to DM interpretation" part, but I could see logic arguing for it and figured it best to post it and let the votes fall as they may :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lunin
      Mar 13 at 22:06










    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "122"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142975%2fis-there-any-way-to-damage-intellect-devourers-when-already-within-a-creature%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    13












    $begingroup$

    You are going to have to see the Intellect Devourer.



    As far as I know, sacred flame is the only spell that can get around total cover as most spells follow the targeting rules that state:




    To target something, you must have a clear path to it, so it can't be behind total cover.




    Sacred flame is able to ignore cover completely, but only because it is a specific exception to this general rule. Because sacred flame is the only option, you are going to need to find a way to see the intellect devourer.



    Ghostly Gaze



    From what I've seen, the only option to see directly into someone's skull is to use the warlock Eldritch Invocation Ghostly Gaze (found in Xanathar's Guide to Everything):




    As an action, you gain the ability to see through solid objects to a range of 30 feet.




    Once you can see into the victim's skull, you can call down holy light to burn it away (i.e. cast sacred flame).



    Surgery



    Credit to divibisan in the comments for this suggestion, and he is absolutely right. You could surgically add a hole in the host's skull (perhaps after knocking them unconscious via the sleep spell).



    There was a procedure going as far back as ancient times called trepanning that involved boring a hole in a patient's skull. Remember that the host in question's brain is already eaten, so you aren't even really at risk of damaging the original host's brain. This would allow you to get sight on the Intellect Devourer to target it with sacred flame.



    However, the Intellect Devourer would not have been affected by sleep, so at any time it might...




    end... [the possession] as a bonus action




    ... and attack.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      once you've got a hole in the target's skull, you can also send a suitably sized Familiar in (such as a tiny spider) to cast Touch ranged spells on the Intellect Devourer.
      $endgroup$
      – PixelMaster
      Mar 13 at 6:37











    • $begingroup$
      +1 for ghostly gaze, that's a sweet solution
      $endgroup$
      – MiniMackie
      Mar 13 at 10:43















    13












    $begingroup$

    You are going to have to see the Intellect Devourer.



    As far as I know, sacred flame is the only spell that can get around total cover as most spells follow the targeting rules that state:




    To target something, you must have a clear path to it, so it can't be behind total cover.




    Sacred flame is able to ignore cover completely, but only because it is a specific exception to this general rule. Because sacred flame is the only option, you are going to need to find a way to see the intellect devourer.



    Ghostly Gaze



    From what I've seen, the only option to see directly into someone's skull is to use the warlock Eldritch Invocation Ghostly Gaze (found in Xanathar's Guide to Everything):




    As an action, you gain the ability to see through solid objects to a range of 30 feet.




    Once you can see into the victim's skull, you can call down holy light to burn it away (i.e. cast sacred flame).



    Surgery



    Credit to divibisan in the comments for this suggestion, and he is absolutely right. You could surgically add a hole in the host's skull (perhaps after knocking them unconscious via the sleep spell).



    There was a procedure going as far back as ancient times called trepanning that involved boring a hole in a patient's skull. Remember that the host in question's brain is already eaten, so you aren't even really at risk of damaging the original host's brain. This would allow you to get sight on the Intellect Devourer to target it with sacred flame.



    However, the Intellect Devourer would not have been affected by sleep, so at any time it might...




    end... [the possession] as a bonus action




    ... and attack.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      once you've got a hole in the target's skull, you can also send a suitably sized Familiar in (such as a tiny spider) to cast Touch ranged spells on the Intellect Devourer.
      $endgroup$
      – PixelMaster
      Mar 13 at 6:37











    • $begingroup$
      +1 for ghostly gaze, that's a sweet solution
      $endgroup$
      – MiniMackie
      Mar 13 at 10:43













    13












    13








    13





    $begingroup$

    You are going to have to see the Intellect Devourer.



    As far as I know, sacred flame is the only spell that can get around total cover as most spells follow the targeting rules that state:




    To target something, you must have a clear path to it, so it can't be behind total cover.




    Sacred flame is able to ignore cover completely, but only because it is a specific exception to this general rule. Because sacred flame is the only option, you are going to need to find a way to see the intellect devourer.



    Ghostly Gaze



    From what I've seen, the only option to see directly into someone's skull is to use the warlock Eldritch Invocation Ghostly Gaze (found in Xanathar's Guide to Everything):




    As an action, you gain the ability to see through solid objects to a range of 30 feet.




    Once you can see into the victim's skull, you can call down holy light to burn it away (i.e. cast sacred flame).



    Surgery



    Credit to divibisan in the comments for this suggestion, and he is absolutely right. You could surgically add a hole in the host's skull (perhaps after knocking them unconscious via the sleep spell).



    There was a procedure going as far back as ancient times called trepanning that involved boring a hole in a patient's skull. Remember that the host in question's brain is already eaten, so you aren't even really at risk of damaging the original host's brain. This would allow you to get sight on the Intellect Devourer to target it with sacred flame.



    However, the Intellect Devourer would not have been affected by sleep, so at any time it might...




    end... [the possession] as a bonus action




    ... and attack.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    You are going to have to see the Intellect Devourer.



    As far as I know, sacred flame is the only spell that can get around total cover as most spells follow the targeting rules that state:




    To target something, you must have a clear path to it, so it can't be behind total cover.




    Sacred flame is able to ignore cover completely, but only because it is a specific exception to this general rule. Because sacred flame is the only option, you are going to need to find a way to see the intellect devourer.



    Ghostly Gaze



    From what I've seen, the only option to see directly into someone's skull is to use the warlock Eldritch Invocation Ghostly Gaze (found in Xanathar's Guide to Everything):




    As an action, you gain the ability to see through solid objects to a range of 30 feet.




    Once you can see into the victim's skull, you can call down holy light to burn it away (i.e. cast sacred flame).



    Surgery



    Credit to divibisan in the comments for this suggestion, and he is absolutely right. You could surgically add a hole in the host's skull (perhaps after knocking them unconscious via the sleep spell).



    There was a procedure going as far back as ancient times called trepanning that involved boring a hole in a patient's skull. Remember that the host in question's brain is already eaten, so you aren't even really at risk of damaging the original host's brain. This would allow you to get sight on the Intellect Devourer to target it with sacred flame.



    However, the Intellect Devourer would not have been affected by sleep, so at any time it might...




    end... [the possession] as a bonus action




    ... and attack.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Mar 12 at 18:56

























    answered Mar 12 at 17:36









    David CoffronDavid Coffron

    37.9k3132267




    37.9k3132267











    • $begingroup$
      once you've got a hole in the target's skull, you can also send a suitably sized Familiar in (such as a tiny spider) to cast Touch ranged spells on the Intellect Devourer.
      $endgroup$
      – PixelMaster
      Mar 13 at 6:37











    • $begingroup$
      +1 for ghostly gaze, that's a sweet solution
      $endgroup$
      – MiniMackie
      Mar 13 at 10:43
















    • $begingroup$
      once you've got a hole in the target's skull, you can also send a suitably sized Familiar in (such as a tiny spider) to cast Touch ranged spells on the Intellect Devourer.
      $endgroup$
      – PixelMaster
      Mar 13 at 6:37











    • $begingroup$
      +1 for ghostly gaze, that's a sweet solution
      $endgroup$
      – MiniMackie
      Mar 13 at 10:43















    $begingroup$
    once you've got a hole in the target's skull, you can also send a suitably sized Familiar in (such as a tiny spider) to cast Touch ranged spells on the Intellect Devourer.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    Mar 13 at 6:37





    $begingroup$
    once you've got a hole in the target's skull, you can also send a suitably sized Familiar in (such as a tiny spider) to cast Touch ranged spells on the Intellect Devourer.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    Mar 13 at 6:37













    $begingroup$
    +1 for ghostly gaze, that's a sweet solution
    $endgroup$
    – MiniMackie
    Mar 13 at 10:43




    $begingroup$
    +1 for ghostly gaze, that's a sweet solution
    $endgroup$
    – MiniMackie
    Mar 13 at 10:43













    7












    $begingroup$

    You can detect the Intellect Devourer using Detect Thoughts. However, you can't target it.



    Detect Thoughts states (italics notes mine):




    You can also use this spell to detect the presence of thinking creatures you can't see. When you cast the spell or as your action during the duration, you can search for thoughts within 30 feet of you. The spell can penetrate barriers, but 2 feet of rock, 2 inches of any metal other than lead, or a thin sheet of lead blocks you. You can't detect a creature with an Intelligence of 3 (Intellect Devourer has 12 INT) or lower or one that doesn't speak any language (Intellect Devourer knows Deep Speech & Telepathy).




    Technically, an Intellect Devourer doesn't speak Deep Speech, and Telepathy is not really "speaking", but that's obviously not the intent of the spell.



    However, the PHB states on page 205, in the chapter Spellcasting > Targeting:




    A Clear Path to the Target



    To target something, you must have a clear path to it, so it can't be behind total cover. If you place an area of effect at a point that you can't see and an obstruction, such as a wall, is between you and that point, the point of origin comes into being on
    the near side of that obstruction.




    This applies regardless of whether or not a spell requires you to see a target.




    Geas



    If you cast Geas on the Intellect Devourer before it enters the body (it cannot be targeted by Geas once it does), you can deal damage to it when it acts "in a manner directly counter to your instructions". Of course, this is a rather constructed example, since it takes one minute to cast Geas.

    However, you could try to control an enemy politician by having a Geas'd Intellect Devourer teleport into its mind and telling the Intellect Devourer what to do. If it doesn't do so, it takes damage while inside a creature. Nevertheless, I don't think this is what you're looking for.




    Arcane Archer's Piercing Arrow



    The Ranger subclass Arcane Archer (XGtE, p. 28) has a Piercing Arrow feature:




    Piercing Arrow. You use transmutation magic to give your arrow an ethereal quality. When you use this option, you don't make an attack roll for the attack.
    Instead, the arrow shoots forward in a line, which is 1 foot wide and 30 feet long, before disappearing. The arrow passes harmlessly through objects, ignoring cover. Each creature in that line must make a Dexterity saving throw. On a failed save, a creature takes damage as if it were hit by the arrow, plus an extra 1d6 piercing damage. On a successful save, a target takes half as much damage.




    One could argue that the sentence indicates that cover provided by creatures isn't ignored. However, that is neither RAW nor do I believe it is intended by the feature - considering that it otherwise also affects all creatures in that line, and taking the "theme" of the feature into account.




    Wish



    Needless to say, Wish can accomplish anything, but that's probably not what you're interested in either.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      7












      $begingroup$

      You can detect the Intellect Devourer using Detect Thoughts. However, you can't target it.



      Detect Thoughts states (italics notes mine):




      You can also use this spell to detect the presence of thinking creatures you can't see. When you cast the spell or as your action during the duration, you can search for thoughts within 30 feet of you. The spell can penetrate barriers, but 2 feet of rock, 2 inches of any metal other than lead, or a thin sheet of lead blocks you. You can't detect a creature with an Intelligence of 3 (Intellect Devourer has 12 INT) or lower or one that doesn't speak any language (Intellect Devourer knows Deep Speech & Telepathy).




      Technically, an Intellect Devourer doesn't speak Deep Speech, and Telepathy is not really "speaking", but that's obviously not the intent of the spell.



      However, the PHB states on page 205, in the chapter Spellcasting > Targeting:




      A Clear Path to the Target



      To target something, you must have a clear path to it, so it can't be behind total cover. If you place an area of effect at a point that you can't see and an obstruction, such as a wall, is between you and that point, the point of origin comes into being on
      the near side of that obstruction.




      This applies regardless of whether or not a spell requires you to see a target.




      Geas



      If you cast Geas on the Intellect Devourer before it enters the body (it cannot be targeted by Geas once it does), you can deal damage to it when it acts "in a manner directly counter to your instructions". Of course, this is a rather constructed example, since it takes one minute to cast Geas.

      However, you could try to control an enemy politician by having a Geas'd Intellect Devourer teleport into its mind and telling the Intellect Devourer what to do. If it doesn't do so, it takes damage while inside a creature. Nevertheless, I don't think this is what you're looking for.




      Arcane Archer's Piercing Arrow



      The Ranger subclass Arcane Archer (XGtE, p. 28) has a Piercing Arrow feature:




      Piercing Arrow. You use transmutation magic to give your arrow an ethereal quality. When you use this option, you don't make an attack roll for the attack.
      Instead, the arrow shoots forward in a line, which is 1 foot wide and 30 feet long, before disappearing. The arrow passes harmlessly through objects, ignoring cover. Each creature in that line must make a Dexterity saving throw. On a failed save, a creature takes damage as if it were hit by the arrow, plus an extra 1d6 piercing damage. On a successful save, a target takes half as much damage.




      One could argue that the sentence indicates that cover provided by creatures isn't ignored. However, that is neither RAW nor do I believe it is intended by the feature - considering that it otherwise also affects all creatures in that line, and taking the "theme" of the feature into account.




      Wish



      Needless to say, Wish can accomplish anything, but that's probably not what you're interested in either.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        7












        7








        7





        $begingroup$

        You can detect the Intellect Devourer using Detect Thoughts. However, you can't target it.



        Detect Thoughts states (italics notes mine):




        You can also use this spell to detect the presence of thinking creatures you can't see. When you cast the spell or as your action during the duration, you can search for thoughts within 30 feet of you. The spell can penetrate barriers, but 2 feet of rock, 2 inches of any metal other than lead, or a thin sheet of lead blocks you. You can't detect a creature with an Intelligence of 3 (Intellect Devourer has 12 INT) or lower or one that doesn't speak any language (Intellect Devourer knows Deep Speech & Telepathy).




        Technically, an Intellect Devourer doesn't speak Deep Speech, and Telepathy is not really "speaking", but that's obviously not the intent of the spell.



        However, the PHB states on page 205, in the chapter Spellcasting > Targeting:




        A Clear Path to the Target



        To target something, you must have a clear path to it, so it can't be behind total cover. If you place an area of effect at a point that you can't see and an obstruction, such as a wall, is between you and that point, the point of origin comes into being on
        the near side of that obstruction.




        This applies regardless of whether or not a spell requires you to see a target.




        Geas



        If you cast Geas on the Intellect Devourer before it enters the body (it cannot be targeted by Geas once it does), you can deal damage to it when it acts "in a manner directly counter to your instructions". Of course, this is a rather constructed example, since it takes one minute to cast Geas.

        However, you could try to control an enemy politician by having a Geas'd Intellect Devourer teleport into its mind and telling the Intellect Devourer what to do. If it doesn't do so, it takes damage while inside a creature. Nevertheless, I don't think this is what you're looking for.




        Arcane Archer's Piercing Arrow



        The Ranger subclass Arcane Archer (XGtE, p. 28) has a Piercing Arrow feature:




        Piercing Arrow. You use transmutation magic to give your arrow an ethereal quality. When you use this option, you don't make an attack roll for the attack.
        Instead, the arrow shoots forward in a line, which is 1 foot wide and 30 feet long, before disappearing. The arrow passes harmlessly through objects, ignoring cover. Each creature in that line must make a Dexterity saving throw. On a failed save, a creature takes damage as if it were hit by the arrow, plus an extra 1d6 piercing damage. On a successful save, a target takes half as much damage.




        One could argue that the sentence indicates that cover provided by creatures isn't ignored. However, that is neither RAW nor do I believe it is intended by the feature - considering that it otherwise also affects all creatures in that line, and taking the "theme" of the feature into account.




        Wish



        Needless to say, Wish can accomplish anything, but that's probably not what you're interested in either.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        You can detect the Intellect Devourer using Detect Thoughts. However, you can't target it.



        Detect Thoughts states (italics notes mine):




        You can also use this spell to detect the presence of thinking creatures you can't see. When you cast the spell or as your action during the duration, you can search for thoughts within 30 feet of you. The spell can penetrate barriers, but 2 feet of rock, 2 inches of any metal other than lead, or a thin sheet of lead blocks you. You can't detect a creature with an Intelligence of 3 (Intellect Devourer has 12 INT) or lower or one that doesn't speak any language (Intellect Devourer knows Deep Speech & Telepathy).




        Technically, an Intellect Devourer doesn't speak Deep Speech, and Telepathy is not really "speaking", but that's obviously not the intent of the spell.



        However, the PHB states on page 205, in the chapter Spellcasting > Targeting:




        A Clear Path to the Target



        To target something, you must have a clear path to it, so it can't be behind total cover. If you place an area of effect at a point that you can't see and an obstruction, such as a wall, is between you and that point, the point of origin comes into being on
        the near side of that obstruction.




        This applies regardless of whether or not a spell requires you to see a target.




        Geas



        If you cast Geas on the Intellect Devourer before it enters the body (it cannot be targeted by Geas once it does), you can deal damage to it when it acts "in a manner directly counter to your instructions". Of course, this is a rather constructed example, since it takes one minute to cast Geas.

        However, you could try to control an enemy politician by having a Geas'd Intellect Devourer teleport into its mind and telling the Intellect Devourer what to do. If it doesn't do so, it takes damage while inside a creature. Nevertheless, I don't think this is what you're looking for.




        Arcane Archer's Piercing Arrow



        The Ranger subclass Arcane Archer (XGtE, p. 28) has a Piercing Arrow feature:




        Piercing Arrow. You use transmutation magic to give your arrow an ethereal quality. When you use this option, you don't make an attack roll for the attack.
        Instead, the arrow shoots forward in a line, which is 1 foot wide and 30 feet long, before disappearing. The arrow passes harmlessly through objects, ignoring cover. Each creature in that line must make a Dexterity saving throw. On a failed save, a creature takes damage as if it were hit by the arrow, plus an extra 1d6 piercing damage. On a successful save, a target takes half as much damage.




        One could argue that the sentence indicates that cover provided by creatures isn't ignored. However, that is neither RAW nor do I believe it is intended by the feature - considering that it otherwise also affects all creatures in that line, and taking the "theme" of the feature into account.




        Wish



        Needless to say, Wish can accomplish anything, but that's probably not what you're interested in either.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Mar 12 at 20:15

























        answered Mar 12 at 19:31









        PixelMasterPixelMaster

        12k246113




        12k246113





















            1












            $begingroup$

            This feels like it may heavily come down to DM interpretation, but if you don't mind frying the host as well, another option might be the humble Fireball.



            Fireball states that:




            The fire spreads around corners.




            This allows fireball to hit enemies in total cover so long as they are within the AoE of the spell and a path exists to the target (no hitting a target in a Resilient Sphere)



            So, if the passageways of the ears/sinuses/whatever holes the Intellect Devourer made on the way in are not entirely blocked off, it could be interpreted as a series of tiny corners which the fireball is able to work its way around and through.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              How is the fire getting into the skull?
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              Mar 13 at 2:40






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Going around corners doesn't mean that the fireball can affect the contents of a sealed room. So, indeed, the DM would have to rule that the devourer is accessible via ears/sinuses as you suggest. Which is quite far-fetched, at least at my table. Combined with surgery, as described in David Coffron's answer, this might work, but there may be better options if you have that level of control over the situation.
              $endgroup$
              – Phlarx
              Mar 13 at 3:46










            • $begingroup$
              Thus the "heavily down to DM interpretation" part, but I could see logic arguing for it and figured it best to post it and let the votes fall as they may :)
              $endgroup$
              – Lunin
              Mar 13 at 22:06















            1












            $begingroup$

            This feels like it may heavily come down to DM interpretation, but if you don't mind frying the host as well, another option might be the humble Fireball.



            Fireball states that:




            The fire spreads around corners.




            This allows fireball to hit enemies in total cover so long as they are within the AoE of the spell and a path exists to the target (no hitting a target in a Resilient Sphere)



            So, if the passageways of the ears/sinuses/whatever holes the Intellect Devourer made on the way in are not entirely blocked off, it could be interpreted as a series of tiny corners which the fireball is able to work its way around and through.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              How is the fire getting into the skull?
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              Mar 13 at 2:40






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Going around corners doesn't mean that the fireball can affect the contents of a sealed room. So, indeed, the DM would have to rule that the devourer is accessible via ears/sinuses as you suggest. Which is quite far-fetched, at least at my table. Combined with surgery, as described in David Coffron's answer, this might work, but there may be better options if you have that level of control over the situation.
              $endgroup$
              – Phlarx
              Mar 13 at 3:46










            • $begingroup$
              Thus the "heavily down to DM interpretation" part, but I could see logic arguing for it and figured it best to post it and let the votes fall as they may :)
              $endgroup$
              – Lunin
              Mar 13 at 22:06













            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            This feels like it may heavily come down to DM interpretation, but if you don't mind frying the host as well, another option might be the humble Fireball.



            Fireball states that:




            The fire spreads around corners.




            This allows fireball to hit enemies in total cover so long as they are within the AoE of the spell and a path exists to the target (no hitting a target in a Resilient Sphere)



            So, if the passageways of the ears/sinuses/whatever holes the Intellect Devourer made on the way in are not entirely blocked off, it could be interpreted as a series of tiny corners which the fireball is able to work its way around and through.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            This feels like it may heavily come down to DM interpretation, but if you don't mind frying the host as well, another option might be the humble Fireball.



            Fireball states that:




            The fire spreads around corners.




            This allows fireball to hit enemies in total cover so long as they are within the AoE of the spell and a path exists to the target (no hitting a target in a Resilient Sphere)



            So, if the passageways of the ears/sinuses/whatever holes the Intellect Devourer made on the way in are not entirely blocked off, it could be interpreted as a series of tiny corners which the fireball is able to work its way around and through.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Mar 13 at 1:02









            LuninLunin

            2,9751517




            2,9751517







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              How is the fire getting into the skull?
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              Mar 13 at 2:40






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Going around corners doesn't mean that the fireball can affect the contents of a sealed room. So, indeed, the DM would have to rule that the devourer is accessible via ears/sinuses as you suggest. Which is quite far-fetched, at least at my table. Combined with surgery, as described in David Coffron's answer, this might work, but there may be better options if you have that level of control over the situation.
              $endgroup$
              – Phlarx
              Mar 13 at 3:46










            • $begingroup$
              Thus the "heavily down to DM interpretation" part, but I could see logic arguing for it and figured it best to post it and let the votes fall as they may :)
              $endgroup$
              – Lunin
              Mar 13 at 22:06












            • 1




              $begingroup$
              How is the fire getting into the skull?
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              Mar 13 at 2:40






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Going around corners doesn't mean that the fireball can affect the contents of a sealed room. So, indeed, the DM would have to rule that the devourer is accessible via ears/sinuses as you suggest. Which is quite far-fetched, at least at my table. Combined with surgery, as described in David Coffron's answer, this might work, but there may be better options if you have that level of control over the situation.
              $endgroup$
              – Phlarx
              Mar 13 at 3:46










            • $begingroup$
              Thus the "heavily down to DM interpretation" part, but I could see logic arguing for it and figured it best to post it and let the votes fall as they may :)
              $endgroup$
              – Lunin
              Mar 13 at 22:06







            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            How is the fire getting into the skull?
            $endgroup$
            – NautArch
            Mar 13 at 2:40




            $begingroup$
            How is the fire getting into the skull?
            $endgroup$
            – NautArch
            Mar 13 at 2:40




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            Going around corners doesn't mean that the fireball can affect the contents of a sealed room. So, indeed, the DM would have to rule that the devourer is accessible via ears/sinuses as you suggest. Which is quite far-fetched, at least at my table. Combined with surgery, as described in David Coffron's answer, this might work, but there may be better options if you have that level of control over the situation.
            $endgroup$
            – Phlarx
            Mar 13 at 3:46




            $begingroup$
            Going around corners doesn't mean that the fireball can affect the contents of a sealed room. So, indeed, the DM would have to rule that the devourer is accessible via ears/sinuses as you suggest. Which is quite far-fetched, at least at my table. Combined with surgery, as described in David Coffron's answer, this might work, but there may be better options if you have that level of control over the situation.
            $endgroup$
            – Phlarx
            Mar 13 at 3:46












            $begingroup$
            Thus the "heavily down to DM interpretation" part, but I could see logic arguing for it and figured it best to post it and let the votes fall as they may :)
            $endgroup$
            – Lunin
            Mar 13 at 22:06




            $begingroup$
            Thus the "heavily down to DM interpretation" part, but I could see logic arguing for it and figured it best to post it and let the votes fall as they may :)
            $endgroup$
            – Lunin
            Mar 13 at 22:06

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142975%2fis-there-any-way-to-damage-intellect-devourers-when-already-within-a-creature%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -dnd-5e, monsters

            Popular posts from this blog

            Creating 100m^2 grid automatically using QGIS?Creating grid constrained within polygon in QGIS?Createing polygon layer from point data using QGIS?Creating vector grid using QGIS?Creating grid polygons from coordinates using R or PythonCreating grid from spatio temporal point data?Creating fields in attributes table using other layers using QGISCreate .shp vector grid in QGISQGIS Creating 4km point grid within polygonsCreate a vector grid over a raster layerVector Grid Creates just one grid

            What is this called? Old film camera viewer?What makes a good film camera?What to do with an old film camera?What should one look for when buying a used film camera?What is the value and age of this pre-1967 Ricoh 35 mm camera?DSLR recommendation, question about old Canon 35mm film Camera & lensesCan anyone identify the silver rangefinder-style camera in this advertisement?What kind of a Polaroid 600-camera is this?Will an old film camera still work even when not used in a very long time?What is this camera / Can I develop the film?How to fit an action camera into antique (bellows) housing?What to check when buying used and old film bodies?

            Why is this plane circling around the Lucknow airport every day?Why do aircraft on Flight Radar 24 jump around randomly sometimes?What airport has this walkway over a taxiway?How does Chicago O'Hare's tower sequence aircraft at peak capacity?Which airport is featured in this Delta commercial?After a crash, for how long is the airport closed?Can a passenger plane stand still in the air, or hover at a fixed location above a ground?What are those trucks towing around, and why?What is this airport outside of Cairo, Egypt?Which US airport has the lowest circling MDH?What is this airport video?