What is meant by the term “i386” on the Ubuntu ISO file name? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How do I boot Ubuntu in VirtualBox complaining that my CPU is incompatible?Which ubuntu 12.04.3 is best for Device lc2430i ?This kernel requires an x84-64 CPU, but only detected an i686 CPUIntel Microcode Necessary?What is it with Ubuntu / Linux, Youtube / HTML5 videos and the high CPU load?logger -s prints <13> in Ubuntu 16 LTSSkipping acquire of configured file 'xxxx' as repository 'xxxx xenial InRelease' doesn't support architecture 'i386'"Behavior of powersave freq governor when cpu quota is setWhy is gcc-4.8 and gcc-5 on Ubuntu 16.04 linking to the same libgomp.so?Does an Intel 1.80GHz quad core processor meet the 2GHz dual core processor system requirements?

How can players take actions together that are impossible otherwise?

How are presidential pardons supposed to be used?

Can smartphones with the same camera sensor have different image quality?

Why don't the Weasley twins use magic outside of school if the Trace can only find the location of spells cast?

Slither Like a Snake

Need a suitable toxic chemical for a murder plot in my novel

How can you insert a "times/divide" symbol similar to the "plus/minus" (±) one?

Is it possible to ask for a hotel room without minibar/extra services?

Cold is to Refrigerator as warm is to?

How can I make names more distinctive without making them longer?

Statistical model of ligand substitution

Can I throw a longsword at someone?

3 doors, three guards, one stone

Simulating Exploding Dice

Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?

If I can make up priors, why can't I make up posteriors?

Using "nakedly" instead of "with nothing on"

Complexity of many constant time steps with occasional logarithmic steps

Is drag coefficient lowest at zero angle of attack?

Why does tar appear to skip file contents when output file is /dev/null?

Replacing HDD with SSD; what about non-APFS/APFS?

Unable to start mainnet node docker container

How do I automatically answer y in bash script?

What do I do if technical issues prevent me from filing my return on time?



What is meant by the term “i386” on the Ubuntu ISO file name?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How do I boot Ubuntu in VirtualBox complaining that my CPU is incompatible?Which ubuntu 12.04.3 is best for Device lc2430i ?This kernel requires an x84-64 CPU, but only detected an i686 CPUIntel Microcode Necessary?What is it with Ubuntu / Linux, Youtube / HTML5 videos and the high CPU load?logger -s prints <13> in Ubuntu 16 LTSSkipping acquire of configured file 'xxxx' as repository 'xxxx xenial InRelease' doesn't support architecture 'i386'"Behavior of powersave freq governor when cpu quota is setWhy is gcc-4.8 and gcc-5 on Ubuntu 16.04 linking to the same libgomp.so?Does an Intel 1.80GHz quad core processor meet the 2GHz dual core processor system requirements?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















I am trying to understand the different terminologies associated with the different CPU versions.



Ubuntu 16.04 uses the term "i386" to refer to their 32-bit version of Ubuntu:



http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/releases/yakkety/ubuntu-16.10-desktop-i386.iso



Does the term "i386" here mean that this version of Ubuntu can work on the Intel 80386 CPU (which was introduced in 1985), or does the term "i386" here just mean that this version of Ubuntu works on the CPUs that are decedents from the Intel 80386 CPU?










share|improve this question







New contributor




user7681202 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Ubuntu hasn't changed the i386 term regardless of which x86 cpu it relates to. The last of the x86 ISOs for x86 require a i686 class of cpu, so no they won't boot & run on a 80386, 80486 or older cpu classes. The 18.10 x86 ISOs (Xubuntu, Lubuntu desktops, plus 19.04 ISO's up until they stopped being produced Dec-2018 for those flavors) however will boot on a pentium 4/pentium M grade single-core 686 class. Descendants of x86 30386 would be correct using wording from your question. Even though many ISO's have stopped being produced, I have Lubuntu 19.04 kernel 5 running on a pentium 4 i686

    – guiverc
    21 hours ago


















2















I am trying to understand the different terminologies associated with the different CPU versions.



Ubuntu 16.04 uses the term "i386" to refer to their 32-bit version of Ubuntu:



http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/releases/yakkety/ubuntu-16.10-desktop-i386.iso



Does the term "i386" here mean that this version of Ubuntu can work on the Intel 80386 CPU (which was introduced in 1985), or does the term "i386" here just mean that this version of Ubuntu works on the CPUs that are decedents from the Intel 80386 CPU?










share|improve this question







New contributor




user7681202 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Ubuntu hasn't changed the i386 term regardless of which x86 cpu it relates to. The last of the x86 ISOs for x86 require a i686 class of cpu, so no they won't boot & run on a 80386, 80486 or older cpu classes. The 18.10 x86 ISOs (Xubuntu, Lubuntu desktops, plus 19.04 ISO's up until they stopped being produced Dec-2018 for those flavors) however will boot on a pentium 4/pentium M grade single-core 686 class. Descendants of x86 30386 would be correct using wording from your question. Even though many ISO's have stopped being produced, I have Lubuntu 19.04 kernel 5 running on a pentium 4 i686

    – guiverc
    21 hours ago














2












2








2








I am trying to understand the different terminologies associated with the different CPU versions.



Ubuntu 16.04 uses the term "i386" to refer to their 32-bit version of Ubuntu:



http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/releases/yakkety/ubuntu-16.10-desktop-i386.iso



Does the term "i386" here mean that this version of Ubuntu can work on the Intel 80386 CPU (which was introduced in 1985), or does the term "i386" here just mean that this version of Ubuntu works on the CPUs that are decedents from the Intel 80386 CPU?










share|improve this question







New contributor




user7681202 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I am trying to understand the different terminologies associated with the different CPU versions.



Ubuntu 16.04 uses the term "i386" to refer to their 32-bit version of Ubuntu:



http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/releases/yakkety/ubuntu-16.10-desktop-i386.iso



Does the term "i386" here mean that this version of Ubuntu can work on the Intel 80386 CPU (which was introduced in 1985), or does the term "i386" here just mean that this version of Ubuntu works on the CPUs that are decedents from the Intel 80386 CPU?







16.04 cpu terminology






share|improve this question







New contributor




user7681202 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




user7681202 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




user7681202 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 21 hours ago









user7681202user7681202

1111




1111




New contributor




user7681202 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user7681202 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user7681202 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • Ubuntu hasn't changed the i386 term regardless of which x86 cpu it relates to. The last of the x86 ISOs for x86 require a i686 class of cpu, so no they won't boot & run on a 80386, 80486 or older cpu classes. The 18.10 x86 ISOs (Xubuntu, Lubuntu desktops, plus 19.04 ISO's up until they stopped being produced Dec-2018 for those flavors) however will boot on a pentium 4/pentium M grade single-core 686 class. Descendants of x86 30386 would be correct using wording from your question. Even though many ISO's have stopped being produced, I have Lubuntu 19.04 kernel 5 running on a pentium 4 i686

    – guiverc
    21 hours ago


















  • Ubuntu hasn't changed the i386 term regardless of which x86 cpu it relates to. The last of the x86 ISOs for x86 require a i686 class of cpu, so no they won't boot & run on a 80386, 80486 or older cpu classes. The 18.10 x86 ISOs (Xubuntu, Lubuntu desktops, plus 19.04 ISO's up until they stopped being produced Dec-2018 for those flavors) however will boot on a pentium 4/pentium M grade single-core 686 class. Descendants of x86 30386 would be correct using wording from your question. Even though many ISO's have stopped being produced, I have Lubuntu 19.04 kernel 5 running on a pentium 4 i686

    – guiverc
    21 hours ago

















Ubuntu hasn't changed the i386 term regardless of which x86 cpu it relates to. The last of the x86 ISOs for x86 require a i686 class of cpu, so no they won't boot & run on a 80386, 80486 or older cpu classes. The 18.10 x86 ISOs (Xubuntu, Lubuntu desktops, plus 19.04 ISO's up until they stopped being produced Dec-2018 for those flavors) however will boot on a pentium 4/pentium M grade single-core 686 class. Descendants of x86 30386 would be correct using wording from your question. Even though many ISO's have stopped being produced, I have Lubuntu 19.04 kernel 5 running on a pentium 4 i686

– guiverc
21 hours ago






Ubuntu hasn't changed the i386 term regardless of which x86 cpu it relates to. The last of the x86 ISOs for x86 require a i686 class of cpu, so no they won't boot & run on a 80386, 80486 or older cpu classes. The 18.10 x86 ISOs (Xubuntu, Lubuntu desktops, plus 19.04 ISO's up until they stopped being produced Dec-2018 for those flavors) however will boot on a pentium 4/pentium M grade single-core 686 class. Descendants of x86 30386 would be correct using wording from your question. Even though many ISO's have stopped being produced, I have Lubuntu 19.04 kernel 5 running on a pentium 4 i686

– guiverc
21 hours ago











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1














The Intel 80386, also known as the i386, or just 386, was a 32-bit microprocessor introduced by Intel in 1985. This is termed x86, IA-32, or the i386-architecture, depending on context.



x86-64 is an extension of the x86 instruction set. It supports vastly larger virtual and physical address spaces than are possible on x86, thereby allowing programmers to conveniently work with much larger data sets... After launching the architecture under the "x86-64" name, AMD renamed it AMD64... x86-64 is still used by many in the industry as a vendor-neutral term, while others, notably Sun Microsystems (now Oracle Corporation) and Microsoft, use x64.



So ubuntu ISO support both the flavours.



What is this Multiarch?



Multiarch lets you install library packages from multiple architectures on the same machine. This is useful in various ways, but the most common is installing both 64 and 32-bit software on the same machine and having dependencies correctly resolved automatically. In general you can have libraries of more than one architecture installed together and applications from one architecture or another installed as alternatives. Note that it does not enable multiple architecture versions of applications to be installed simultaneously.



$ dpkg --print-architecture
enter image description hereFigure-1: This Computer system has 64-bit Kernel Architecture.



Multi-arch support allows you to use 32-bit libraries alongside 64-bit libraries.



$ dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
enter image description hereFigure-2: This Computer system also supports i386 Architecture (i.e. supports 32-bit Libraries too).






share|improve this answer






























    0














    You are correct...



    i386 line has been introduced in 1985, and it was the first publically available Intel 32 bit chip. 80286 and (little known) 80186 were 16 bit, and 8086 and 8088 were 8 bit.



    In this sense when you see i368 in the package names and installation images it means that it requires 32 bit operations, but does not require 64 bit ones. Now although 32 bits were introduced rather fast, 64 bit operations were slowly fazed in. Pentium pro line already had some 64 bit operations, but i am unsure if it could do everything that current 64 bit architecture can do. Therefore you do not see a processor version for 64 bit packages, but they actually state that they are actually 64 bit.




    Trivia: Did you know that even today when your machine boots the processor wakes up as an 8 bit machine and then needs to be told by a bios that it can do more?






    share|improve this answer























    • x86 processors have no "8-bit" mode. They wake up in 8086 compatibility mode which is 16 bit. You may have it confused with the 8088 which was used in the first IBM PCs -- but even that was a 16-bit core modified to work with 8-bit peripherals.

      – Henning Makholm
      17 hours ago



















    0














    Ubuntu hasn't changed the i386 term regardless of which x86 cpu it relates to. The reason for this is Debian refers to all x86 (32-bit) as i386, and Ubuntu (downstream) has followed suit. (https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch02s01.html.en#idm181)



    The last of the x86 ISOs for x86 require a i686 class of cpu, so no they won't boot & run on a 80386, 80486 or older cpu classes.



    The 18.10 flavor x86 desktop ISOs (Xubuntu, Lubuntu desktops, plus 19.04 ISO's up until they stopped being produced Dec-2018 for those flavors) however will boot on a pentium 4/pentium M grade single-core 686 class.



    Yes, 'descendants of x86 30386' would thus be correct using wording from your question. Even though many ISO's have stopped being produced, I have Lubuntu 19.04 kernel 5 running on a pentium 4 i686, and yes x86/i686 is still supported, but it now has minimal install options, and support is reduced (and may not extend to Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, but 18.04 LTS still works with i686/x86/i386)






    share|improve this answer























    • I looked for a good ubuntu reference (wiki/help) but didn't find one. The information is mostly release specific in lists.ubuntu.com ML notices with regard the dropping of x86 and what generation of cpu was required to boot each subsequent release (eg. as i386 moved to i586, i686 etc).

      – guiverc
      21 hours ago











    • I have a pentium 4 machine running Lubuntu 19.04 (5.0 kernel) on a (QA or quality-assurance) test box. Yes the machine would probably run mainstream Ubuntu 19.04 but is so under-powered I'd not want to try. When I referred to Mailing List notices; they were made only because upstream (eg. kernel, adobe or whoever) modified requirements for the upstream packages, so Canonical/Ubuntu just provided notice of the change when that package was in it's next release.

      – guiverc
      20 hours ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "89"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    user7681202 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1133736%2fwhat-is-meant-by-the-term-i386-on-the-ubuntu-iso-file-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    The Intel 80386, also known as the i386, or just 386, was a 32-bit microprocessor introduced by Intel in 1985. This is termed x86, IA-32, or the i386-architecture, depending on context.



    x86-64 is an extension of the x86 instruction set. It supports vastly larger virtual and physical address spaces than are possible on x86, thereby allowing programmers to conveniently work with much larger data sets... After launching the architecture under the "x86-64" name, AMD renamed it AMD64... x86-64 is still used by many in the industry as a vendor-neutral term, while others, notably Sun Microsystems (now Oracle Corporation) and Microsoft, use x64.



    So ubuntu ISO support both the flavours.



    What is this Multiarch?



    Multiarch lets you install library packages from multiple architectures on the same machine. This is useful in various ways, but the most common is installing both 64 and 32-bit software on the same machine and having dependencies correctly resolved automatically. In general you can have libraries of more than one architecture installed together and applications from one architecture or another installed as alternatives. Note that it does not enable multiple architecture versions of applications to be installed simultaneously.



    $ dpkg --print-architecture
    enter image description hereFigure-1: This Computer system has 64-bit Kernel Architecture.



    Multi-arch support allows you to use 32-bit libraries alongside 64-bit libraries.



    $ dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
    enter image description hereFigure-2: This Computer system also supports i386 Architecture (i.e. supports 32-bit Libraries too).






    share|improve this answer



























      1














      The Intel 80386, also known as the i386, or just 386, was a 32-bit microprocessor introduced by Intel in 1985. This is termed x86, IA-32, or the i386-architecture, depending on context.



      x86-64 is an extension of the x86 instruction set. It supports vastly larger virtual and physical address spaces than are possible on x86, thereby allowing programmers to conveniently work with much larger data sets... After launching the architecture under the "x86-64" name, AMD renamed it AMD64... x86-64 is still used by many in the industry as a vendor-neutral term, while others, notably Sun Microsystems (now Oracle Corporation) and Microsoft, use x64.



      So ubuntu ISO support both the flavours.



      What is this Multiarch?



      Multiarch lets you install library packages from multiple architectures on the same machine. This is useful in various ways, but the most common is installing both 64 and 32-bit software on the same machine and having dependencies correctly resolved automatically. In general you can have libraries of more than one architecture installed together and applications from one architecture or another installed as alternatives. Note that it does not enable multiple architecture versions of applications to be installed simultaneously.



      $ dpkg --print-architecture
      enter image description hereFigure-1: This Computer system has 64-bit Kernel Architecture.



      Multi-arch support allows you to use 32-bit libraries alongside 64-bit libraries.



      $ dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
      enter image description hereFigure-2: This Computer system also supports i386 Architecture (i.e. supports 32-bit Libraries too).






      share|improve this answer

























        1












        1








        1







        The Intel 80386, also known as the i386, or just 386, was a 32-bit microprocessor introduced by Intel in 1985. This is termed x86, IA-32, or the i386-architecture, depending on context.



        x86-64 is an extension of the x86 instruction set. It supports vastly larger virtual and physical address spaces than are possible on x86, thereby allowing programmers to conveniently work with much larger data sets... After launching the architecture under the "x86-64" name, AMD renamed it AMD64... x86-64 is still used by many in the industry as a vendor-neutral term, while others, notably Sun Microsystems (now Oracle Corporation) and Microsoft, use x64.



        So ubuntu ISO support both the flavours.



        What is this Multiarch?



        Multiarch lets you install library packages from multiple architectures on the same machine. This is useful in various ways, but the most common is installing both 64 and 32-bit software on the same machine and having dependencies correctly resolved automatically. In general you can have libraries of more than one architecture installed together and applications from one architecture or another installed as alternatives. Note that it does not enable multiple architecture versions of applications to be installed simultaneously.



        $ dpkg --print-architecture
        enter image description hereFigure-1: This Computer system has 64-bit Kernel Architecture.



        Multi-arch support allows you to use 32-bit libraries alongside 64-bit libraries.



        $ dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
        enter image description hereFigure-2: This Computer system also supports i386 Architecture (i.e. supports 32-bit Libraries too).






        share|improve this answer













        The Intel 80386, also known as the i386, or just 386, was a 32-bit microprocessor introduced by Intel in 1985. This is termed x86, IA-32, or the i386-architecture, depending on context.



        x86-64 is an extension of the x86 instruction set. It supports vastly larger virtual and physical address spaces than are possible on x86, thereby allowing programmers to conveniently work with much larger data sets... After launching the architecture under the "x86-64" name, AMD renamed it AMD64... x86-64 is still used by many in the industry as a vendor-neutral term, while others, notably Sun Microsystems (now Oracle Corporation) and Microsoft, use x64.



        So ubuntu ISO support both the flavours.



        What is this Multiarch?



        Multiarch lets you install library packages from multiple architectures on the same machine. This is useful in various ways, but the most common is installing both 64 and 32-bit software on the same machine and having dependencies correctly resolved automatically. In general you can have libraries of more than one architecture installed together and applications from one architecture or another installed as alternatives. Note that it does not enable multiple architecture versions of applications to be installed simultaneously.



        $ dpkg --print-architecture
        enter image description hereFigure-1: This Computer system has 64-bit Kernel Architecture.



        Multi-arch support allows you to use 32-bit libraries alongside 64-bit libraries.



        $ dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
        enter image description hereFigure-2: This Computer system also supports i386 Architecture (i.e. supports 32-bit Libraries too).







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 20 hours ago









        MarmayogiMarmayogi

        86047




        86047























            0














            You are correct...



            i386 line has been introduced in 1985, and it was the first publically available Intel 32 bit chip. 80286 and (little known) 80186 were 16 bit, and 8086 and 8088 were 8 bit.



            In this sense when you see i368 in the package names and installation images it means that it requires 32 bit operations, but does not require 64 bit ones. Now although 32 bits were introduced rather fast, 64 bit operations were slowly fazed in. Pentium pro line already had some 64 bit operations, but i am unsure if it could do everything that current 64 bit architecture can do. Therefore you do not see a processor version for 64 bit packages, but they actually state that they are actually 64 bit.




            Trivia: Did you know that even today when your machine boots the processor wakes up as an 8 bit machine and then needs to be told by a bios that it can do more?






            share|improve this answer























            • x86 processors have no "8-bit" mode. They wake up in 8086 compatibility mode which is 16 bit. You may have it confused with the 8088 which was used in the first IBM PCs -- but even that was a 16-bit core modified to work with 8-bit peripherals.

              – Henning Makholm
              17 hours ago
















            0














            You are correct...



            i386 line has been introduced in 1985, and it was the first publically available Intel 32 bit chip. 80286 and (little known) 80186 were 16 bit, and 8086 and 8088 were 8 bit.



            In this sense when you see i368 in the package names and installation images it means that it requires 32 bit operations, but does not require 64 bit ones. Now although 32 bits were introduced rather fast, 64 bit operations were slowly fazed in. Pentium pro line already had some 64 bit operations, but i am unsure if it could do everything that current 64 bit architecture can do. Therefore you do not see a processor version for 64 bit packages, but they actually state that they are actually 64 bit.




            Trivia: Did you know that even today when your machine boots the processor wakes up as an 8 bit machine and then needs to be told by a bios that it can do more?






            share|improve this answer























            • x86 processors have no "8-bit" mode. They wake up in 8086 compatibility mode which is 16 bit. You may have it confused with the 8088 which was used in the first IBM PCs -- but even that was a 16-bit core modified to work with 8-bit peripherals.

              – Henning Makholm
              17 hours ago














            0












            0








            0







            You are correct...



            i386 line has been introduced in 1985, and it was the first publically available Intel 32 bit chip. 80286 and (little known) 80186 were 16 bit, and 8086 and 8088 were 8 bit.



            In this sense when you see i368 in the package names and installation images it means that it requires 32 bit operations, but does not require 64 bit ones. Now although 32 bits were introduced rather fast, 64 bit operations were slowly fazed in. Pentium pro line already had some 64 bit operations, but i am unsure if it could do everything that current 64 bit architecture can do. Therefore you do not see a processor version for 64 bit packages, but they actually state that they are actually 64 bit.




            Trivia: Did you know that even today when your machine boots the processor wakes up as an 8 bit machine and then needs to be told by a bios that it can do more?






            share|improve this answer













            You are correct...



            i386 line has been introduced in 1985, and it was the first publically available Intel 32 bit chip. 80286 and (little known) 80186 were 16 bit, and 8086 and 8088 were 8 bit.



            In this sense when you see i368 in the package names and installation images it means that it requires 32 bit operations, but does not require 64 bit ones. Now although 32 bits were introduced rather fast, 64 bit operations were slowly fazed in. Pentium pro line already had some 64 bit operations, but i am unsure if it could do everything that current 64 bit architecture can do. Therefore you do not see a processor version for 64 bit packages, but they actually state that they are actually 64 bit.




            Trivia: Did you know that even today when your machine boots the processor wakes up as an 8 bit machine and then needs to be told by a bios that it can do more?







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 21 hours ago









            v010dyav010dya

            7022929




            7022929












            • x86 processors have no "8-bit" mode. They wake up in 8086 compatibility mode which is 16 bit. You may have it confused with the 8088 which was used in the first IBM PCs -- but even that was a 16-bit core modified to work with 8-bit peripherals.

              – Henning Makholm
              17 hours ago


















            • x86 processors have no "8-bit" mode. They wake up in 8086 compatibility mode which is 16 bit. You may have it confused with the 8088 which was used in the first IBM PCs -- but even that was a 16-bit core modified to work with 8-bit peripherals.

              – Henning Makholm
              17 hours ago

















            x86 processors have no "8-bit" mode. They wake up in 8086 compatibility mode which is 16 bit. You may have it confused with the 8088 which was used in the first IBM PCs -- but even that was a 16-bit core modified to work with 8-bit peripherals.

            – Henning Makholm
            17 hours ago






            x86 processors have no "8-bit" mode. They wake up in 8086 compatibility mode which is 16 bit. You may have it confused with the 8088 which was used in the first IBM PCs -- but even that was a 16-bit core modified to work with 8-bit peripherals.

            – Henning Makholm
            17 hours ago












            0














            Ubuntu hasn't changed the i386 term regardless of which x86 cpu it relates to. The reason for this is Debian refers to all x86 (32-bit) as i386, and Ubuntu (downstream) has followed suit. (https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch02s01.html.en#idm181)



            The last of the x86 ISOs for x86 require a i686 class of cpu, so no they won't boot & run on a 80386, 80486 or older cpu classes.



            The 18.10 flavor x86 desktop ISOs (Xubuntu, Lubuntu desktops, plus 19.04 ISO's up until they stopped being produced Dec-2018 for those flavors) however will boot on a pentium 4/pentium M grade single-core 686 class.



            Yes, 'descendants of x86 30386' would thus be correct using wording from your question. Even though many ISO's have stopped being produced, I have Lubuntu 19.04 kernel 5 running on a pentium 4 i686, and yes x86/i686 is still supported, but it now has minimal install options, and support is reduced (and may not extend to Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, but 18.04 LTS still works with i686/x86/i386)






            share|improve this answer























            • I looked for a good ubuntu reference (wiki/help) but didn't find one. The information is mostly release specific in lists.ubuntu.com ML notices with regard the dropping of x86 and what generation of cpu was required to boot each subsequent release (eg. as i386 moved to i586, i686 etc).

              – guiverc
              21 hours ago











            • I have a pentium 4 machine running Lubuntu 19.04 (5.0 kernel) on a (QA or quality-assurance) test box. Yes the machine would probably run mainstream Ubuntu 19.04 but is so under-powered I'd not want to try. When I referred to Mailing List notices; they were made only because upstream (eg. kernel, adobe or whoever) modified requirements for the upstream packages, so Canonical/Ubuntu just provided notice of the change when that package was in it's next release.

              – guiverc
              20 hours ago















            0














            Ubuntu hasn't changed the i386 term regardless of which x86 cpu it relates to. The reason for this is Debian refers to all x86 (32-bit) as i386, and Ubuntu (downstream) has followed suit. (https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch02s01.html.en#idm181)



            The last of the x86 ISOs for x86 require a i686 class of cpu, so no they won't boot & run on a 80386, 80486 or older cpu classes.



            The 18.10 flavor x86 desktop ISOs (Xubuntu, Lubuntu desktops, plus 19.04 ISO's up until they stopped being produced Dec-2018 for those flavors) however will boot on a pentium 4/pentium M grade single-core 686 class.



            Yes, 'descendants of x86 30386' would thus be correct using wording from your question. Even though many ISO's have stopped being produced, I have Lubuntu 19.04 kernel 5 running on a pentium 4 i686, and yes x86/i686 is still supported, but it now has minimal install options, and support is reduced (and may not extend to Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, but 18.04 LTS still works with i686/x86/i386)






            share|improve this answer























            • I looked for a good ubuntu reference (wiki/help) but didn't find one. The information is mostly release specific in lists.ubuntu.com ML notices with regard the dropping of x86 and what generation of cpu was required to boot each subsequent release (eg. as i386 moved to i586, i686 etc).

              – guiverc
              21 hours ago











            • I have a pentium 4 machine running Lubuntu 19.04 (5.0 kernel) on a (QA or quality-assurance) test box. Yes the machine would probably run mainstream Ubuntu 19.04 but is so under-powered I'd not want to try. When I referred to Mailing List notices; they were made only because upstream (eg. kernel, adobe or whoever) modified requirements for the upstream packages, so Canonical/Ubuntu just provided notice of the change when that package was in it's next release.

              – guiverc
              20 hours ago













            0












            0








            0







            Ubuntu hasn't changed the i386 term regardless of which x86 cpu it relates to. The reason for this is Debian refers to all x86 (32-bit) as i386, and Ubuntu (downstream) has followed suit. (https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch02s01.html.en#idm181)



            The last of the x86 ISOs for x86 require a i686 class of cpu, so no they won't boot & run on a 80386, 80486 or older cpu classes.



            The 18.10 flavor x86 desktop ISOs (Xubuntu, Lubuntu desktops, plus 19.04 ISO's up until they stopped being produced Dec-2018 for those flavors) however will boot on a pentium 4/pentium M grade single-core 686 class.



            Yes, 'descendants of x86 30386' would thus be correct using wording from your question. Even though many ISO's have stopped being produced, I have Lubuntu 19.04 kernel 5 running on a pentium 4 i686, and yes x86/i686 is still supported, but it now has minimal install options, and support is reduced (and may not extend to Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, but 18.04 LTS still works with i686/x86/i386)






            share|improve this answer













            Ubuntu hasn't changed the i386 term regardless of which x86 cpu it relates to. The reason for this is Debian refers to all x86 (32-bit) as i386, and Ubuntu (downstream) has followed suit. (https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch02s01.html.en#idm181)



            The last of the x86 ISOs for x86 require a i686 class of cpu, so no they won't boot & run on a 80386, 80486 or older cpu classes.



            The 18.10 flavor x86 desktop ISOs (Xubuntu, Lubuntu desktops, plus 19.04 ISO's up until they stopped being produced Dec-2018 for those flavors) however will boot on a pentium 4/pentium M grade single-core 686 class.



            Yes, 'descendants of x86 30386' would thus be correct using wording from your question. Even though many ISO's have stopped being produced, I have Lubuntu 19.04 kernel 5 running on a pentium 4 i686, and yes x86/i686 is still supported, but it now has minimal install options, and support is reduced (and may not extend to Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, but 18.04 LTS still works with i686/x86/i386)







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 21 hours ago









            guivercguiverc

            5,18921723




            5,18921723












            • I looked for a good ubuntu reference (wiki/help) but didn't find one. The information is mostly release specific in lists.ubuntu.com ML notices with regard the dropping of x86 and what generation of cpu was required to boot each subsequent release (eg. as i386 moved to i586, i686 etc).

              – guiverc
              21 hours ago











            • I have a pentium 4 machine running Lubuntu 19.04 (5.0 kernel) on a (QA or quality-assurance) test box. Yes the machine would probably run mainstream Ubuntu 19.04 but is so under-powered I'd not want to try. When I referred to Mailing List notices; they were made only because upstream (eg. kernel, adobe or whoever) modified requirements for the upstream packages, so Canonical/Ubuntu just provided notice of the change when that package was in it's next release.

              – guiverc
              20 hours ago

















            • I looked for a good ubuntu reference (wiki/help) but didn't find one. The information is mostly release specific in lists.ubuntu.com ML notices with regard the dropping of x86 and what generation of cpu was required to boot each subsequent release (eg. as i386 moved to i586, i686 etc).

              – guiverc
              21 hours ago











            • I have a pentium 4 machine running Lubuntu 19.04 (5.0 kernel) on a (QA or quality-assurance) test box. Yes the machine would probably run mainstream Ubuntu 19.04 but is so under-powered I'd not want to try. When I referred to Mailing List notices; they were made only because upstream (eg. kernel, adobe or whoever) modified requirements for the upstream packages, so Canonical/Ubuntu just provided notice of the change when that package was in it's next release.

              – guiverc
              20 hours ago
















            I looked for a good ubuntu reference (wiki/help) but didn't find one. The information is mostly release specific in lists.ubuntu.com ML notices with regard the dropping of x86 and what generation of cpu was required to boot each subsequent release (eg. as i386 moved to i586, i686 etc).

            – guiverc
            21 hours ago





            I looked for a good ubuntu reference (wiki/help) but didn't find one. The information is mostly release specific in lists.ubuntu.com ML notices with regard the dropping of x86 and what generation of cpu was required to boot each subsequent release (eg. as i386 moved to i586, i686 etc).

            – guiverc
            21 hours ago













            I have a pentium 4 machine running Lubuntu 19.04 (5.0 kernel) on a (QA or quality-assurance) test box. Yes the machine would probably run mainstream Ubuntu 19.04 but is so under-powered I'd not want to try. When I referred to Mailing List notices; they were made only because upstream (eg. kernel, adobe or whoever) modified requirements for the upstream packages, so Canonical/Ubuntu just provided notice of the change when that package was in it's next release.

            – guiverc
            20 hours ago





            I have a pentium 4 machine running Lubuntu 19.04 (5.0 kernel) on a (QA or quality-assurance) test box. Yes the machine would probably run mainstream Ubuntu 19.04 but is so under-powered I'd not want to try. When I referred to Mailing List notices; they were made only because upstream (eg. kernel, adobe or whoever) modified requirements for the upstream packages, so Canonical/Ubuntu just provided notice of the change when that package was in it's next release.

            – guiverc
            20 hours ago










            user7681202 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            user7681202 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            user7681202 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            user7681202 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1133736%2fwhat-is-meant-by-the-term-i386-on-the-ubuntu-iso-file-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -16.04, cpu, terminology

            Popular posts from this blog

            Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god existsWord for having a definite opinion while simultaneously withholding judgment?What's the opposite of “newcomer? Is ”veteran" OK?What do you call an “atheist” who might believe in an afterlife?What's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Word for someone who dismisses contrary opinions as irrational?Somone who thinks they are overly special/out of the ordinaryIs there a word, phrase or idiom for “a person who is incapable of thinking about the future”?The belief that a god is human-likeA word for a non-famous person/thing you have heard a lot aboutAdjective for a person who enjoys taking care of their appearance

            What was this official D&D 3.5e Lovecraft-flavored rulebook?What was this set of RPG tools called?As a first-time DM should I let my players play complex character classes and roles?Nymph's Kiss and the RelationshipWhat was the name of this Cleric Prestige Class that shapes metal with its bare hands?Are the 3.5e Dragonlance books third party or official works?What's up with the domain Vile Darkness?What was this 80s book about RPGs?What was the name of this Werewolf band?What book had Rituals to “upgrade” animal companions to keep them viable at higher levels?What was this RPG that had rules for player-owned businesses?

            2017 IndyCar Series Contents Series news Teams and drivers Schedule Season summary Footnotes References External links Navigation menu"INDYCAR: Initial 2018 bodywork concepts unveiled"the original"IndyCar confirms switch to Performance Friction brakes in 2017""AJ Foyt Racing will switch to Chevy"the original"Carlos Munoz, Conor Daly will drive for AJ Foyt Racing""Zach Veach's Indy 500 Debut Confirmed with Foyt""No mass exodus from Honda after Ganassi switch""Ex-F1 driver Sato joins Andretti Autosport for 2017 IndyCar season""IndyCar's Ryan Hunter-Reay, sponsor DHL paired through 2020""hhgregg and Andretti Autosport announce partnership for key races in 2016""INDYCAR: Rossi re-signs with Andretti"the original"McLaren Formula 1 - Fernando Alonso to race at Indy 500 with McLaren, Honda and Andretti Autosport""Shank will finally take part in Indy 500 with Harvey, Andretti | MotorSportsTalk""Andretti adds Jack Harvey to Indy 500 field""Ganassi switches to Honda power for 2017""INDYCAR: Chilton returns to Ganassi"the original"IndyCar silly season: Who's going where in 2017?""INDYCAR: Kanaan, NTT Data return to Ganassi"the original"Kimball to remain at Ganassi for 2017""Coyne confirms Bourdais for 2017 IndyCar season""Davison to sub for Bourdais in Indy 500"the original"Gutierrez confirmed for Detroit IndyCar debut""Gutierrez returns with Coyne for rest of 2017 season""Vautier to drive for Coyne at Texas"the original"INDYCAR: Coyne confirms Jones for 2017"the original"Pippa Mann returns to Coyne for Indy 500""Karam, Dreyer & Reinbold teaming up again for Indianapolis 500""Pigot to return to Ed Carpenter Racing""Hildebrand confirmed as full-time Ed Carpenter driver""Veach to replace injured Hildebrand at Barber"the originalNew Team Harding Racing Enters Chaves for 101st Indianapolis 500"Juncos Racing Announces Entry in 101st Running of the Indianapolis 500 :: Juncos Racing""Juncos confirms Pigot for Indy 500""Saavedra confirmed in Juncos' second 500 entry"the original"Lazier confirms Indy 500 run after son's USF2000 debut"the original"Claman DeMelo to race for RLLR at Sonoma"the original"Rahal signs Servia and ace engineer for 2017""IndyCar: Aleshin returns with Schmidt"the original"Aleshin replaced by Saavedra for Toronto""Jack Harvey will pilot SPM No. 7 car at Watkins Glen, Sonoma""Jay Howard confirmed in Tony Stewart's supported SPM Indy entry""INDYCAR: Newgarden to wave the flag at Penske"the original"Pagenaud opts for No. 1 in 2017"the original"Penske confirms Newgarden for 2017""Montoya to stay with Team Penske in 2017""Target leaving IndyCar after 27 seasons with Chip Ganassi""Cavin: IndyCar could see complete driver/team shakeup in 2017""End of the road for KV Racing?""KV Racing confirms closure, equipment sold to Juncos""Juncos confirms IndyCar Series entry"the original"Juncos readies IndyCar program, aims for '17 500"the original"Harding Racing to add Texas, Pocono to schedule"the original"Sato signs with Andretti Autosport for 2017""INDYCAR: Aleshin in Doubt at SPM"the original"Long Beach notebook: JR Hildebrand breaks hand""Hildebrand cleared to return at Phoenix"the original"Bourdais to undergo surgery on multiple fractures""Aleshin loses Schmidt Peterson IndyCar ride""Saavedra in at SPM for Pocono, Gateway"the original"Bourdais to make return at Gateway"the original"The IndyCar Grand Prix no longer is sponsored by Angie's List""2017 IndyCar Series rulebook""2017 Verizon IndyCar Series Official Rulebook"Official websiteeeeee