What is the domain of the function $f(x)=sqrt[3]x^3-x$? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)When should the antiderivative of a rational function be defined as a piecewise function?Domain of this functionWhat is the domain of the inverse functionDomain of the function and its simplified expressionIs this interval in the domain?Showing that $sum_n=2^infty f(frac 1n)$ converges using the MVTWhat does it mean for a function to be continuous on its domain?Finding the domain of $sqrtx^2-7$Maximum domain of definition of some $ln$ and $sqrtx$ functionNo Derivability at 0+ point, why not including 0 in function domain

Direct Experience of Meditation

Is 1 ppb equal to 1 μg/kg?

Complexity of many constant time steps with occasional logarithmic steps

Can a zero nonce be safely used with AES-GCM if the key is random and never used again?

How does modal jazz use chord progressions?

Can I throw a longsword at someone?

Strange behaviour of Check

Why is "Captain Marvel" translated as male in Portugal?

Determine whether f is a function, an injection, a surjection

How are presidential pardons supposed to be used?

How do you clear the ApexPages.getMessages() collection in a test?

Slither Like a Snake

Is there a service that would inform me whenever a new direct route is scheduled from a given airport?

When communicating altitude with a '9' in it, should it be pronounced "nine hundred" or "niner hundred"?

Is it possible to ask for a hotel room without minibar/extra services?

What to do with post with dry rot?

What is the order of Mitzvot in Rambam's Sefer Hamitzvot?

Biased dice probability question

What do you call a plan that's an alternative plan in case your initial plan fails?

What LEGO pieces have "real-world" functionality?

New Order #5: where Fibonacci and Beatty meet at Wythoff

How should I respond to a player wanting to catch a sword between their hands?

What computer would be fastest for Mathematica Home Edition?

I'm having difficulty getting my players to do stuff in a sandbox campaign



What is the domain of the function $f(x)=sqrt[3]x^3-x$?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)When should the antiderivative of a rational function be defined as a piecewise function?Domain of this functionWhat is the domain of the inverse functionDomain of the function and its simplified expressionIs this interval in the domain?Showing that $sum_n=2^infty f(frac 1n)$ converges using the MVTWhat does it mean for a function to be continuous on its domain?Finding the domain of $sqrtx^2-7$Maximum domain of definition of some $ln$ and $sqrtx$ functionNo Derivability at 0+ point, why not including 0 in function domain










5












$begingroup$


Let $f$ be: $f(x) = sqrt[3]x^3 -x$, an exercise book asked for the domain of definition. Isn't it over $mathbb R$. The book solution stated $Df = [-1,0] cup [1, +infty[$
I don t get it. Can you explain?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    It is $$x^3-xgeq 0$$
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think it's better $D(f)=mathbb R$, but if $g(x)=(x^3-x)^frac13$ so $D(g)=xinmathbb R.$ All these a definition only.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    19 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @Dr.SonnhardGraubner can you explain why?
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    $$g(0)=0$$ dear Michael.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Are you quite sure it wasn't $sqrtx^3-x$? Because the domain of $sqrt[3]x^3 -x$ is $Bbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    11 hours ago















5












$begingroup$


Let $f$ be: $f(x) = sqrt[3]x^3 -x$, an exercise book asked for the domain of definition. Isn't it over $mathbb R$. The book solution stated $Df = [-1,0] cup [1, +infty[$
I don t get it. Can you explain?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    It is $$x^3-xgeq 0$$
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think it's better $D(f)=mathbb R$, but if $g(x)=(x^3-x)^frac13$ so $D(g)=xinmathbb R.$ All these a definition only.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    19 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @Dr.SonnhardGraubner can you explain why?
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    $$g(0)=0$$ dear Michael.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Are you quite sure it wasn't $sqrtx^3-x$? Because the domain of $sqrt[3]x^3 -x$ is $Bbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    11 hours ago













5












5








5





$begingroup$


Let $f$ be: $f(x) = sqrt[3]x^3 -x$, an exercise book asked for the domain of definition. Isn't it over $mathbb R$. The book solution stated $Df = [-1,0] cup [1, +infty[$
I don t get it. Can you explain?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $f$ be: $f(x) = sqrt[3]x^3 -x$, an exercise book asked for the domain of definition. Isn't it over $mathbb R$. The book solution stated $Df = [-1,0] cup [1, +infty[$
I don t get it. Can you explain?







calculus






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 11 hours ago









Asaf Karagila

308k33441775




308k33441775










asked 19 hours ago









J.MohJ.Moh

695




695











  • $begingroup$
    It is $$x^3-xgeq 0$$
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think it's better $D(f)=mathbb R$, but if $g(x)=(x^3-x)^frac13$ so $D(g)=xinmathbb R.$ All these a definition only.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    19 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @Dr.SonnhardGraubner can you explain why?
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    $$g(0)=0$$ dear Michael.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Are you quite sure it wasn't $sqrtx^3-x$? Because the domain of $sqrt[3]x^3 -x$ is $Bbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    11 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    It is $$x^3-xgeq 0$$
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think it's better $D(f)=mathbb R$, but if $g(x)=(x^3-x)^frac13$ so $D(g)=xinmathbb R.$ All these a definition only.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    19 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @Dr.SonnhardGraubner can you explain why?
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    $$g(0)=0$$ dear Michael.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Are you quite sure it wasn't $sqrtx^3-x$? Because the domain of $sqrt[3]x^3 -x$ is $Bbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    11 hours ago















$begingroup$
It is $$x^3-xgeq 0$$
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
19 hours ago




$begingroup$
It is $$x^3-xgeq 0$$
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
19 hours ago












$begingroup$
I think it's better $D(f)=mathbb R$, but if $g(x)=(x^3-x)^frac13$ so $D(g)=xinmathbb R.$ All these a definition only.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
19 hours ago





$begingroup$
I think it's better $D(f)=mathbb R$, but if $g(x)=(x^3-x)^frac13$ so $D(g)=xinmathbb R.$ All these a definition only.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
19 hours ago













$begingroup$
@Dr.SonnhardGraubner can you explain why?
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
19 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Dr.SonnhardGraubner can you explain why?
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
19 hours ago












$begingroup$
$$g(0)=0$$ dear Michael.
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
19 hours ago




$begingroup$
$$g(0)=0$$ dear Michael.
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
19 hours ago












$begingroup$
Are you quite sure it wasn't $sqrtx^3-x$? Because the domain of $sqrt[3]x^3 -x$ is $Bbb R$.
$endgroup$
– TonyK
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
Are you quite sure it wasn't $sqrtx^3-x$? Because the domain of $sqrt[3]x^3 -x$ is $Bbb R$.
$endgroup$
– TonyK
11 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















12












$begingroup$

If your book reaches the domain $[-1,0]cup[1,+infty)$, it must be because the book only considers $sqrt[3]phantomX$ to be defined when the argument is a non-negative real.



Books (and people) differ in how they consider $sqrt[N]phantom X$ to be defined.



Some people find it okay to define odd roots on the entire real line -- after all, $xmapsto x^N$ is a bijection on $mathbb R$ when $N$ is positive odd, and every such bijection has a perfectly fine inverse.



Other people prefer to restrict these functions to non-negative reals, no matter what $N$ is -- partially to avoid creating a (confusing?) distinction between odd and even $N$, partially for more subtle reasons that unfortunately are not apparent when one first learns about roots.



(For even subtler reasons, one might even want to reserve the root notation to arguments that are strictly positive, such that $sqrt 0$ is considered undefined. It is somewhat rare to take that position consistently, though).



You'll just have to live with the fact that such questions cannot be answered without knowing which convention for the root sign is to be used. (Arguably it is bad form to let a find-the-domain-of-this-expression exercise depend on such choices, but that's purely the textbook's fault, of course).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    18 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]x$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbbR x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbbR$ to $mathbbR$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    13 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @user21820 I did
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    13 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3187198%2fwhat-is-the-domain-of-the-function-fx-sqrt3x3-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









12












$begingroup$

If your book reaches the domain $[-1,0]cup[1,+infty)$, it must be because the book only considers $sqrt[3]phantomX$ to be defined when the argument is a non-negative real.



Books (and people) differ in how they consider $sqrt[N]phantom X$ to be defined.



Some people find it okay to define odd roots on the entire real line -- after all, $xmapsto x^N$ is a bijection on $mathbb R$ when $N$ is positive odd, and every such bijection has a perfectly fine inverse.



Other people prefer to restrict these functions to non-negative reals, no matter what $N$ is -- partially to avoid creating a (confusing?) distinction between odd and even $N$, partially for more subtle reasons that unfortunately are not apparent when one first learns about roots.



(For even subtler reasons, one might even want to reserve the root notation to arguments that are strictly positive, such that $sqrt 0$ is considered undefined. It is somewhat rare to take that position consistently, though).



You'll just have to live with the fact that such questions cannot be answered without knowing which convention for the root sign is to be used. (Arguably it is bad form to let a find-the-domain-of-this-expression exercise depend on such choices, but that's purely the textbook's fault, of course).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    18 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]x$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbbR x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbbR$ to $mathbbR$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    13 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @user21820 I did
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    13 hours ago















12












$begingroup$

If your book reaches the domain $[-1,0]cup[1,+infty)$, it must be because the book only considers $sqrt[3]phantomX$ to be defined when the argument is a non-negative real.



Books (and people) differ in how they consider $sqrt[N]phantom X$ to be defined.



Some people find it okay to define odd roots on the entire real line -- after all, $xmapsto x^N$ is a bijection on $mathbb R$ when $N$ is positive odd, and every such bijection has a perfectly fine inverse.



Other people prefer to restrict these functions to non-negative reals, no matter what $N$ is -- partially to avoid creating a (confusing?) distinction between odd and even $N$, partially for more subtle reasons that unfortunately are not apparent when one first learns about roots.



(For even subtler reasons, one might even want to reserve the root notation to arguments that are strictly positive, such that $sqrt 0$ is considered undefined. It is somewhat rare to take that position consistently, though).



You'll just have to live with the fact that such questions cannot be answered without knowing which convention for the root sign is to be used. (Arguably it is bad form to let a find-the-domain-of-this-expression exercise depend on such choices, but that's purely the textbook's fault, of course).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    18 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]x$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbbR x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbbR$ to $mathbbR$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    13 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @user21820 I did
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    13 hours ago













12












12








12





$begingroup$

If your book reaches the domain $[-1,0]cup[1,+infty)$, it must be because the book only considers $sqrt[3]phantomX$ to be defined when the argument is a non-negative real.



Books (and people) differ in how they consider $sqrt[N]phantom X$ to be defined.



Some people find it okay to define odd roots on the entire real line -- after all, $xmapsto x^N$ is a bijection on $mathbb R$ when $N$ is positive odd, and every such bijection has a perfectly fine inverse.



Other people prefer to restrict these functions to non-negative reals, no matter what $N$ is -- partially to avoid creating a (confusing?) distinction between odd and even $N$, partially for more subtle reasons that unfortunately are not apparent when one first learns about roots.



(For even subtler reasons, one might even want to reserve the root notation to arguments that are strictly positive, such that $sqrt 0$ is considered undefined. It is somewhat rare to take that position consistently, though).



You'll just have to live with the fact that such questions cannot be answered without knowing which convention for the root sign is to be used. (Arguably it is bad form to let a find-the-domain-of-this-expression exercise depend on such choices, but that's purely the textbook's fault, of course).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



If your book reaches the domain $[-1,0]cup[1,+infty)$, it must be because the book only considers $sqrt[3]phantomX$ to be defined when the argument is a non-negative real.



Books (and people) differ in how they consider $sqrt[N]phantom X$ to be defined.



Some people find it okay to define odd roots on the entire real line -- after all, $xmapsto x^N$ is a bijection on $mathbb R$ when $N$ is positive odd, and every such bijection has a perfectly fine inverse.



Other people prefer to restrict these functions to non-negative reals, no matter what $N$ is -- partially to avoid creating a (confusing?) distinction between odd and even $N$, partially for more subtle reasons that unfortunately are not apparent when one first learns about roots.



(For even subtler reasons, one might even want to reserve the root notation to arguments that are strictly positive, such that $sqrt 0$ is considered undefined. It is somewhat rare to take that position consistently, though).



You'll just have to live with the fact that such questions cannot be answered without knowing which convention for the root sign is to be used. (Arguably it is bad form to let a find-the-domain-of-this-expression exercise depend on such choices, but that's purely the textbook's fault, of course).







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 19 hours ago

























answered 19 hours ago









Henning MakholmHenning Makholm

243k17312556




243k17312556











  • $begingroup$
    That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    18 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]x$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbbR x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbbR$ to $mathbbR$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    13 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @user21820 I did
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    13 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    18 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]x$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbbR x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbbR$ to $mathbbR$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    13 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @user21820 I did
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    13 hours ago















$begingroup$
That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
18 hours ago





$begingroup$
That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
18 hours ago





1




1




$begingroup$
@J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]x$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbbR x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbbR$ to $mathbbR$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
$endgroup$
– user21820
13 hours ago





$begingroup$
@J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]x$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbbR x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbbR$ to $mathbbR$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
$endgroup$
– user21820
13 hours ago













$begingroup$
@J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
$endgroup$
– user21820
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
@J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
$endgroup$
– user21820
13 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
13 hours ago












$begingroup$
@user21820 I did
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
@user21820 I did
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
13 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3187198%2fwhat-is-the-domain-of-the-function-fx-sqrt3x3-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-calculus

Popular posts from this blog

Mobil Contents History Mobil brands Former Mobil brands Lukoil transaction Mobil UK Mobil Australia Mobil New Zealand Mobil Greece Mobil in Japan Mobil in Canada Mobil Egypt See also References External links Navigation menuwww.mobil.com"Mobil Corporation"the original"Our Houston campus""Business & Finance: Socony-Vacuum Corp.""Popular Mechanics""Lubrite Technologies""Exxon Mobil campus 'clearly happening'""Toledo Blade - Google News Archive Search""The Lion and the Moose - How 2 Executives Pulled off the Biggest Merger Ever""ExxonMobil Press Release""Lubricants""Archived copy"the original"Mobil 1™ and Mobil Super™ motor oil and synthetic motor oil - Mobil™ Motor Oils""Mobil Delvac""Mobil Industrial website""The State of Competition in Gasoline Marketing: The Effects of Refiner Operations at Retail""Mobil Travel Guide to become Forbes Travel Guide""Hotel Rankings: Forbes Merges with Mobil"the original"Jamieson oil industry history""Mobil news""Caltex pumps for control""Watchdog blocks Caltex bid""Exxon Mobil sells service station network""Mobil Oil New Zealand Limited is New Zealand's oldest oil company, with predecessor companies having first established a presence in the country in 1896""ExxonMobil subsidiaries have a business history in New Zealand stretching back more than 120 years. We are involved in petroleum refining and distribution and the marketing of fuels, lubricants and chemical products""Archived copy"the original"Exxon Mobil to Sell Its Japanese Arm for $3.9 Billion""Gas station merger will end Esso and Mobil's long run in Japan""Esso moves to affiliate itself with PC Optimum, no longer Aeroplan, in loyalty point switch""Mobil brand of gas stations to launch in Canada after deal for 213 Loblaws-owned locations""Mobil Nears Completion of Rebranding 200 Loblaw Gas Stations""Learn about ExxonMobil's operations in Egypt""Petrol and Diesel Service Stations in Egypt - Mobil"Official websiteExxon Mobil corporate websiteMobil Industrial official websiteeeeeeeeDA04275022275790-40000 0001 0860 5061n82045453134887257134887257

Identify plant with long narrow paired leaves and reddish stems Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?What is this plant with long sharp leaves? Is it a weed?What is this 3ft high, stalky plant, with mid sized narrow leaves?What is this young shrub with opposite ovate, crenate leaves and reddish stems?What is this plant with large broad serrated leaves?Identify this upright branching weed with long leaves and reddish stemsPlease help me identify this bulbous plant with long, broad leaves and white flowersWhat is this small annual with narrow gray/green leaves and rust colored daisy-type flowers?What is this chilli plant?Does anyone know what type of chilli plant this is?Help identify this plant

My Life (Mary J. Blige album) Contents Background Critical reception Accolades Commercial performance Track listing Personnel Charts Certifications See also References External links Navigation menu"1. Mary J Blige, My Life - The 50 Best R&B albums of the '90s""American album certifications – Mary J. Blige – My Life""Mary J. Blige's My Life LP (1994) revisited with co-producer Chucky Thompson | Return To The Classics"the original"Key Tracks: Mary J. Blige's My Life""My Life – Mary J. Blige""Worth The Wait""My Life""Forget '411,' Mary J., Better Call 911""Spins"My Life AccoladesThe 500 Greatest Albums of All TimeTime's All-TIME 100 Albums"Top RPM Albums: Issue chartid""Dutchcharts.nl – Mary J. Blige – My Life""Mary J. Blige | Artist | Official Charts""Mary J. Blige Chart History (Billboard 200)""Mary J. Blige Chart History (Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums)""Canadian album certifications – Mary J Blige – My Life""British album certifications – Mary J Blige – My Life""American album certifications – Mary J Blige – My Life"My LifeMy Life accoladesee