What is the domain of the function $f(x)=sqrt[3]x^3-x$? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)When should the antiderivative of a rational function be defined as a piecewise function?Domain of this functionWhat is the domain of the inverse functionDomain of the function and its simplified expressionIs this interval in the domain?Showing that $sum_n=2^infty f(frac 1n)$ converges using the MVTWhat does it mean for a function to be continuous on its domain?Finding the domain of $sqrtx^2-7$Maximum domain of definition of some $ln$ and $sqrtx$ functionNo Derivability at 0+ point, why not including 0 in function domain

Direct Experience of Meditation

Is 1 ppb equal to 1 μg/kg?

Complexity of many constant time steps with occasional logarithmic steps

Can a zero nonce be safely used with AES-GCM if the key is random and never used again?

How does modal jazz use chord progressions?

Can I throw a longsword at someone?

Strange behaviour of Check

Why is "Captain Marvel" translated as male in Portugal?

Determine whether f is a function, an injection, a surjection

How are presidential pardons supposed to be used?

How do you clear the ApexPages.getMessages() collection in a test?

Slither Like a Snake

Is there a service that would inform me whenever a new direct route is scheduled from a given airport?

When communicating altitude with a '9' in it, should it be pronounced "nine hundred" or "niner hundred"?

Is it possible to ask for a hotel room without minibar/extra services?

What to do with post with dry rot?

What is the order of Mitzvot in Rambam's Sefer Hamitzvot?

Biased dice probability question

What do you call a plan that's an alternative plan in case your initial plan fails?

What LEGO pieces have "real-world" functionality?

New Order #5: where Fibonacci and Beatty meet at Wythoff

How should I respond to a player wanting to catch a sword between their hands?

What computer would be fastest for Mathematica Home Edition?

I'm having difficulty getting my players to do stuff in a sandbox campaign



What is the domain of the function $f(x)=sqrt[3]x^3-x$?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)When should the antiderivative of a rational function be defined as a piecewise function?Domain of this functionWhat is the domain of the inverse functionDomain of the function and its simplified expressionIs this interval in the domain?Showing that $sum_n=2^infty f(frac 1n)$ converges using the MVTWhat does it mean for a function to be continuous on its domain?Finding the domain of $sqrtx^2-7$Maximum domain of definition of some $ln$ and $sqrtx$ functionNo Derivability at 0+ point, why not including 0 in function domain










5












$begingroup$


Let $f$ be: $f(x) = sqrt[3]x^3 -x$, an exercise book asked for the domain of definition. Isn't it over $mathbb R$. The book solution stated $Df = [-1,0] cup [1, +infty[$
I don t get it. Can you explain?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    It is $$x^3-xgeq 0$$
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think it's better $D(f)=mathbb R$, but if $g(x)=(x^3-x)^frac13$ so $D(g)=xinmathbb R.$ All these a definition only.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    19 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @Dr.SonnhardGraubner can you explain why?
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    $$g(0)=0$$ dear Michael.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Are you quite sure it wasn't $sqrtx^3-x$? Because the domain of $sqrt[3]x^3 -x$ is $Bbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    11 hours ago















5












$begingroup$


Let $f$ be: $f(x) = sqrt[3]x^3 -x$, an exercise book asked for the domain of definition. Isn't it over $mathbb R$. The book solution stated $Df = [-1,0] cup [1, +infty[$
I don t get it. Can you explain?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    It is $$x^3-xgeq 0$$
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think it's better $D(f)=mathbb R$, but if $g(x)=(x^3-x)^frac13$ so $D(g)=xinmathbb R.$ All these a definition only.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    19 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @Dr.SonnhardGraubner can you explain why?
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    $$g(0)=0$$ dear Michael.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Are you quite sure it wasn't $sqrtx^3-x$? Because the domain of $sqrt[3]x^3 -x$ is $Bbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    11 hours ago













5












5








5





$begingroup$


Let $f$ be: $f(x) = sqrt[3]x^3 -x$, an exercise book asked for the domain of definition. Isn't it over $mathbb R$. The book solution stated $Df = [-1,0] cup [1, +infty[$
I don t get it. Can you explain?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $f$ be: $f(x) = sqrt[3]x^3 -x$, an exercise book asked for the domain of definition. Isn't it over $mathbb R$. The book solution stated $Df = [-1,0] cup [1, +infty[$
I don t get it. Can you explain?







calculus






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 11 hours ago









Asaf Karagila

308k33441775




308k33441775










asked 19 hours ago









J.MohJ.Moh

695




695











  • $begingroup$
    It is $$x^3-xgeq 0$$
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think it's better $D(f)=mathbb R$, but if $g(x)=(x^3-x)^frac13$ so $D(g)=xinmathbb R.$ All these a definition only.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    19 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @Dr.SonnhardGraubner can you explain why?
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    $$g(0)=0$$ dear Michael.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Are you quite sure it wasn't $sqrtx^3-x$? Because the domain of $sqrt[3]x^3 -x$ is $Bbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    11 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    It is $$x^3-xgeq 0$$
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think it's better $D(f)=mathbb R$, but if $g(x)=(x^3-x)^frac13$ so $D(g)=xinmathbb R.$ All these a definition only.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    19 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @Dr.SonnhardGraubner can you explain why?
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    $$g(0)=0$$ dear Michael.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Are you quite sure it wasn't $sqrtx^3-x$? Because the domain of $sqrt[3]x^3 -x$ is $Bbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    11 hours ago















$begingroup$
It is $$x^3-xgeq 0$$
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
19 hours ago




$begingroup$
It is $$x^3-xgeq 0$$
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
19 hours ago












$begingroup$
I think it's better $D(f)=mathbb R$, but if $g(x)=(x^3-x)^frac13$ so $D(g)=xinmathbb R.$ All these a definition only.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
19 hours ago





$begingroup$
I think it's better $D(f)=mathbb R$, but if $g(x)=(x^3-x)^frac13$ so $D(g)=xinmathbb R.$ All these a definition only.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
19 hours ago













$begingroup$
@Dr.SonnhardGraubner can you explain why?
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
19 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Dr.SonnhardGraubner can you explain why?
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
19 hours ago












$begingroup$
$$g(0)=0$$ dear Michael.
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
19 hours ago




$begingroup$
$$g(0)=0$$ dear Michael.
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
19 hours ago












$begingroup$
Are you quite sure it wasn't $sqrtx^3-x$? Because the domain of $sqrt[3]x^3 -x$ is $Bbb R$.
$endgroup$
– TonyK
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
Are you quite sure it wasn't $sqrtx^3-x$? Because the domain of $sqrt[3]x^3 -x$ is $Bbb R$.
$endgroup$
– TonyK
11 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















12












$begingroup$

If your book reaches the domain $[-1,0]cup[1,+infty)$, it must be because the book only considers $sqrt[3]phantomX$ to be defined when the argument is a non-negative real.



Books (and people) differ in how they consider $sqrt[N]phantom X$ to be defined.



Some people find it okay to define odd roots on the entire real line -- after all, $xmapsto x^N$ is a bijection on $mathbb R$ when $N$ is positive odd, and every such bijection has a perfectly fine inverse.



Other people prefer to restrict these functions to non-negative reals, no matter what $N$ is -- partially to avoid creating a (confusing?) distinction between odd and even $N$, partially for more subtle reasons that unfortunately are not apparent when one first learns about roots.



(For even subtler reasons, one might even want to reserve the root notation to arguments that are strictly positive, such that $sqrt 0$ is considered undefined. It is somewhat rare to take that position consistently, though).



You'll just have to live with the fact that such questions cannot be answered without knowing which convention for the root sign is to be used. (Arguably it is bad form to let a find-the-domain-of-this-expression exercise depend on such choices, but that's purely the textbook's fault, of course).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    18 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]x$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbbR x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbbR$ to $mathbbR$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    13 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @user21820 I did
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    13 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3187198%2fwhat-is-the-domain-of-the-function-fx-sqrt3x3-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









12












$begingroup$

If your book reaches the domain $[-1,0]cup[1,+infty)$, it must be because the book only considers $sqrt[3]phantomX$ to be defined when the argument is a non-negative real.



Books (and people) differ in how they consider $sqrt[N]phantom X$ to be defined.



Some people find it okay to define odd roots on the entire real line -- after all, $xmapsto x^N$ is a bijection on $mathbb R$ when $N$ is positive odd, and every such bijection has a perfectly fine inverse.



Other people prefer to restrict these functions to non-negative reals, no matter what $N$ is -- partially to avoid creating a (confusing?) distinction between odd and even $N$, partially for more subtle reasons that unfortunately are not apparent when one first learns about roots.



(For even subtler reasons, one might even want to reserve the root notation to arguments that are strictly positive, such that $sqrt 0$ is considered undefined. It is somewhat rare to take that position consistently, though).



You'll just have to live with the fact that such questions cannot be answered without knowing which convention for the root sign is to be used. (Arguably it is bad form to let a find-the-domain-of-this-expression exercise depend on such choices, but that's purely the textbook's fault, of course).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    18 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]x$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbbR x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbbR$ to $mathbbR$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    13 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @user21820 I did
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    13 hours ago















12












$begingroup$

If your book reaches the domain $[-1,0]cup[1,+infty)$, it must be because the book only considers $sqrt[3]phantomX$ to be defined when the argument is a non-negative real.



Books (and people) differ in how they consider $sqrt[N]phantom X$ to be defined.



Some people find it okay to define odd roots on the entire real line -- after all, $xmapsto x^N$ is a bijection on $mathbb R$ when $N$ is positive odd, and every such bijection has a perfectly fine inverse.



Other people prefer to restrict these functions to non-negative reals, no matter what $N$ is -- partially to avoid creating a (confusing?) distinction between odd and even $N$, partially for more subtle reasons that unfortunately are not apparent when one first learns about roots.



(For even subtler reasons, one might even want to reserve the root notation to arguments that are strictly positive, such that $sqrt 0$ is considered undefined. It is somewhat rare to take that position consistently, though).



You'll just have to live with the fact that such questions cannot be answered without knowing which convention for the root sign is to be used. (Arguably it is bad form to let a find-the-domain-of-this-expression exercise depend on such choices, but that's purely the textbook's fault, of course).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    18 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]x$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbbR x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbbR$ to $mathbbR$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    13 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @user21820 I did
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    13 hours ago













12












12








12





$begingroup$

If your book reaches the domain $[-1,0]cup[1,+infty)$, it must be because the book only considers $sqrt[3]phantomX$ to be defined when the argument is a non-negative real.



Books (and people) differ in how they consider $sqrt[N]phantom X$ to be defined.



Some people find it okay to define odd roots on the entire real line -- after all, $xmapsto x^N$ is a bijection on $mathbb R$ when $N$ is positive odd, and every such bijection has a perfectly fine inverse.



Other people prefer to restrict these functions to non-negative reals, no matter what $N$ is -- partially to avoid creating a (confusing?) distinction between odd and even $N$, partially for more subtle reasons that unfortunately are not apparent when one first learns about roots.



(For even subtler reasons, one might even want to reserve the root notation to arguments that are strictly positive, such that $sqrt 0$ is considered undefined. It is somewhat rare to take that position consistently, though).



You'll just have to live with the fact that such questions cannot be answered without knowing which convention for the root sign is to be used. (Arguably it is bad form to let a find-the-domain-of-this-expression exercise depend on such choices, but that's purely the textbook's fault, of course).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



If your book reaches the domain $[-1,0]cup[1,+infty)$, it must be because the book only considers $sqrt[3]phantomX$ to be defined when the argument is a non-negative real.



Books (and people) differ in how they consider $sqrt[N]phantom X$ to be defined.



Some people find it okay to define odd roots on the entire real line -- after all, $xmapsto x^N$ is a bijection on $mathbb R$ when $N$ is positive odd, and every such bijection has a perfectly fine inverse.



Other people prefer to restrict these functions to non-negative reals, no matter what $N$ is -- partially to avoid creating a (confusing?) distinction between odd and even $N$, partially for more subtle reasons that unfortunately are not apparent when one first learns about roots.



(For even subtler reasons, one might even want to reserve the root notation to arguments that are strictly positive, such that $sqrt 0$ is considered undefined. It is somewhat rare to take that position consistently, though).



You'll just have to live with the fact that such questions cannot be answered without knowing which convention for the root sign is to be used. (Arguably it is bad form to let a find-the-domain-of-this-expression exercise depend on such choices, but that's purely the textbook's fault, of course).







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 19 hours ago

























answered 19 hours ago









Henning MakholmHenning Makholm

243k17312556




243k17312556











  • $begingroup$
    That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    18 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]x$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbbR x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbbR$ to $mathbbR$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    13 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @user21820 I did
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    13 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    18 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]x$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbbR x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbbR$ to $mathbbR$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    13 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @user21820 I did
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    13 hours ago















$begingroup$
That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
18 hours ago





$begingroup$
That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
18 hours ago





1




1




$begingroup$
@J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]x$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbbR x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbbR$ to $mathbbR$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
$endgroup$
– user21820
13 hours ago





$begingroup$
@J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]x$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbbR x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbbR$ to $mathbbR$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
$endgroup$
– user21820
13 hours ago













$begingroup$
@J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
$endgroup$
– user21820
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
@J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
$endgroup$
– user21820
13 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
13 hours ago












$begingroup$
@user21820 I did
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
@user21820 I did
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
13 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3187198%2fwhat-is-the-domain-of-the-function-fx-sqrt3x3-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-calculus

Popular posts from this blog

Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god existsWord for having a definite opinion while simultaneously withholding judgment?What's the opposite of “newcomer? Is ”veteran" OK?What do you call an “atheist” who might believe in an afterlife?What's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Word for someone who dismisses contrary opinions as irrational?Somone who thinks they are overly special/out of the ordinaryIs there a word, phrase or idiom for “a person who is incapable of thinking about the future”?The belief that a god is human-likeA word for a non-famous person/thing you have heard a lot aboutAdjective for a person who enjoys taking care of their appearance

What was this official D&D 3.5e Lovecraft-flavored rulebook?What was this set of RPG tools called?As a first-time DM should I let my players play complex character classes and roles?Nymph's Kiss and the RelationshipWhat was the name of this Cleric Prestige Class that shapes metal with its bare hands?Are the 3.5e Dragonlance books third party or official works?What's up with the domain Vile Darkness?What was this 80s book about RPGs?What was the name of this Werewolf band?What book had Rituals to “upgrade” animal companions to keep them viable at higher levels?What was this RPG that had rules for player-owned businesses?

2017 IndyCar Series Contents Series news Teams and drivers Schedule Season summary Footnotes References External links Navigation menu"INDYCAR: Initial 2018 bodywork concepts unveiled"the original"IndyCar confirms switch to Performance Friction brakes in 2017""AJ Foyt Racing will switch to Chevy"the original"Carlos Munoz, Conor Daly will drive for AJ Foyt Racing""Zach Veach's Indy 500 Debut Confirmed with Foyt""No mass exodus from Honda after Ganassi switch""Ex-F1 driver Sato joins Andretti Autosport for 2017 IndyCar season""IndyCar's Ryan Hunter-Reay, sponsor DHL paired through 2020""hhgregg and Andretti Autosport announce partnership for key races in 2016""INDYCAR: Rossi re-signs with Andretti"the original"McLaren Formula 1 - Fernando Alonso to race at Indy 500 with McLaren, Honda and Andretti Autosport""Shank will finally take part in Indy 500 with Harvey, Andretti | MotorSportsTalk""Andretti adds Jack Harvey to Indy 500 field""Ganassi switches to Honda power for 2017""INDYCAR: Chilton returns to Ganassi"the original"IndyCar silly season: Who's going where in 2017?""INDYCAR: Kanaan, NTT Data return to Ganassi"the original"Kimball to remain at Ganassi for 2017""Coyne confirms Bourdais for 2017 IndyCar season""Davison to sub for Bourdais in Indy 500"the original"Gutierrez confirmed for Detroit IndyCar debut""Gutierrez returns with Coyne for rest of 2017 season""Vautier to drive for Coyne at Texas"the original"INDYCAR: Coyne confirms Jones for 2017"the original"Pippa Mann returns to Coyne for Indy 500""Karam, Dreyer & Reinbold teaming up again for Indianapolis 500""Pigot to return to Ed Carpenter Racing""Hildebrand confirmed as full-time Ed Carpenter driver""Veach to replace injured Hildebrand at Barber"the originalNew Team Harding Racing Enters Chaves for 101st Indianapolis 500"Juncos Racing Announces Entry in 101st Running of the Indianapolis 500 :: Juncos Racing""Juncos confirms Pigot for Indy 500""Saavedra confirmed in Juncos' second 500 entry"the original"Lazier confirms Indy 500 run after son's USF2000 debut"the original"Claman DeMelo to race for RLLR at Sonoma"the original"Rahal signs Servia and ace engineer for 2017""IndyCar: Aleshin returns with Schmidt"the original"Aleshin replaced by Saavedra for Toronto""Jack Harvey will pilot SPM No. 7 car at Watkins Glen, Sonoma""Jay Howard confirmed in Tony Stewart's supported SPM Indy entry""INDYCAR: Newgarden to wave the flag at Penske"the original"Pagenaud opts for No. 1 in 2017"the original"Penske confirms Newgarden for 2017""Montoya to stay with Team Penske in 2017""Target leaving IndyCar after 27 seasons with Chip Ganassi""Cavin: IndyCar could see complete driver/team shakeup in 2017""End of the road for KV Racing?""KV Racing confirms closure, equipment sold to Juncos""Juncos confirms IndyCar Series entry"the original"Juncos readies IndyCar program, aims for '17 500"the original"Harding Racing to add Texas, Pocono to schedule"the original"Sato signs with Andretti Autosport for 2017""INDYCAR: Aleshin in Doubt at SPM"the original"Long Beach notebook: JR Hildebrand breaks hand""Hildebrand cleared to return at Phoenix"the original"Bourdais to undergo surgery on multiple fractures""Aleshin loses Schmidt Peterson IndyCar ride""Saavedra in at SPM for Pocono, Gateway"the original"Bourdais to make return at Gateway"the original"The IndyCar Grand Prix no longer is sponsored by Angie's List""2017 IndyCar Series rulebook""2017 Verizon IndyCar Series Official Rulebook"Official websiteeeeee