Is the differential, dp, exact or not?How to make approximation of rotational partition function of diatomic linear molecules?How to derive the pressure dependency for the Gibbs free energy?Why is dU an exact differential and dq an inexact differential?Can a change in internal energy always be expressed as the product of the constant volume heat capacity and the change in temperature?How to prove that entropy is a state function?Gas expansion through adiabatic turbineDetermining pressure of sublimation of iodineHow to properly rearrange the first law of thermodynamics?Entropy and specific heat capacityExpression for fugacity coefficient derived from a pressure-explicite EOS

PTIJ: Sport in the Torah

What does *dead* mean in *What do you mean, dead?*?

Where is the License file location for Identity Server in Sitecore 9.1?

I've given my players a lot of magic items. Is it reasonable for me to give them harder encounters?

How to write a chaotic neutral protagonist and prevent my readers from thinking they are evil?

Ultrafilters as a double dual

Why do we say 'Pairwise Disjoint', rather than 'Disjoint'?

Short story about cities being connected by a conveyor belt

Create chunks from an array

Who has more? Ireland or Iceland?

How does a sound wave propagate?

Use Mercury as quenching liquid for swords?

The (Easy) Road to Code

Should we avoid writing fiction about historical events without extensive research?

Book where society has been split into 2 with a wall down the middle where one side embraced high tech whereas other side were totally against tech

Interpretation of linear regression interaction term plot

Unfamiliar notation in Diabelli's "Duet in D" for piano

I am the light that shines in the dark

Is there a math expression equivalent to the conditional ternary operator?

Why do phishing e-mails use faked e-mail addresses instead of the real one?

Will the concrete slab in a partially heated shed conduct a lot of heat to the unconditioned area?

Is this Paypal Github SDK reference really a dangerous site?

Why do we call complex numbers “numbers” but we don’t consider 2-vectors numbers?

Tabular environment - text vertically positions itself by bottom of tikz picture in adjacent cell



Is the differential, dp, exact or not?


How to make approximation of rotational partition function of diatomic linear molecules?How to derive the pressure dependency for the Gibbs free energy?Why is dU an exact differential and dq an inexact differential?Can a change in internal energy always be expressed as the product of the constant volume heat capacity and the change in temperature?How to prove that entropy is a state function?Gas expansion through adiabatic turbineDetermining pressure of sublimation of iodineHow to properly rearrange the first law of thermodynamics?Entropy and specific heat capacityExpression for fugacity coefficient derived from a pressure-explicite EOS













5












$begingroup$



Consider the differential $$mathrm dp=frac RV,mathrm dT+left(frac2aV^2-fracRTV^2right),mathrm dV$$ (where $a$ is a constant value)



(a) Determine whether the above differential, i.e. $mathrm dp$, is exact or not. Show all your steps and evaluation of the appropriate partial differentials!




I have no idea on how to even start this. As far as I can tell the differential is exact, but I don't know how to prove or show it. I'm really struggling to show the steps involved. I would appreciate any advice and thank you very much in advance.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is a mathmatics question.
    $endgroup$
    – A.K.
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Not all chemistry is done in a vial.
    $endgroup$
    – Charlie Crown
    1 hour ago















5












$begingroup$



Consider the differential $$mathrm dp=frac RV,mathrm dT+left(frac2aV^2-fracRTV^2right),mathrm dV$$ (where $a$ is a constant value)



(a) Determine whether the above differential, i.e. $mathrm dp$, is exact or not. Show all your steps and evaluation of the appropriate partial differentials!




I have no idea on how to even start this. As far as I can tell the differential is exact, but I don't know how to prove or show it. I'm really struggling to show the steps involved. I would appreciate any advice and thank you very much in advance.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is a mathmatics question.
    $endgroup$
    – A.K.
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Not all chemistry is done in a vial.
    $endgroup$
    – Charlie Crown
    1 hour ago













5












5








5


1



$begingroup$



Consider the differential $$mathrm dp=frac RV,mathrm dT+left(frac2aV^2-fracRTV^2right),mathrm dV$$ (where $a$ is a constant value)



(a) Determine whether the above differential, i.e. $mathrm dp$, is exact or not. Show all your steps and evaluation of the appropriate partial differentials!




I have no idea on how to even start this. As far as I can tell the differential is exact, but I don't know how to prove or show it. I'm really struggling to show the steps involved. I would appreciate any advice and thank you very much in advance.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$





Consider the differential $$mathrm dp=frac RV,mathrm dT+left(frac2aV^2-fracRTV^2right),mathrm dV$$ (where $a$ is a constant value)



(a) Determine whether the above differential, i.e. $mathrm dp$, is exact or not. Show all your steps and evaluation of the appropriate partial differentials!




I have no idea on how to even start this. As far as I can tell the differential is exact, but I don't know how to prove or show it. I'm really struggling to show the steps involved. I would appreciate any advice and thank you very much in advance.







thermodynamics






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 6 hours ago









Charlie Crown

368114




368114










asked 11 hours ago









NicciNicci

552




552











  • $begingroup$
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is a mathmatics question.
    $endgroup$
    – A.K.
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Not all chemistry is done in a vial.
    $endgroup$
    – Charlie Crown
    1 hour ago
















  • $begingroup$
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is a mathmatics question.
    $endgroup$
    – A.K.
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Not all chemistry is done in a vial.
    $endgroup$
    – Charlie Crown
    1 hour ago















$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is a mathmatics question.
$endgroup$
– A.K.
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is a mathmatics question.
$endgroup$
– A.K.
4 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
Not all chemistry is done in a vial.
$endgroup$
– Charlie Crown
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Not all chemistry is done in a vial.
$endgroup$
– Charlie Crown
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

Your function $p$ is a function of the independent variables $V$ and $T$ i.e., $p(V,T)$. The other variables, $a$, and $R$ are constants.



Let me rewrite the differential as



$$mathrmdp = A(V)mathrmdT + B(T,V),mathrmdV$$



where



$$A(V) = fracRV$$



and



$$ B(T,V) = left( frac2aV^3 - fracRTV^2 right) $$



A differential is exact if



$$left( fracpartial Apartial V right)_T = left( fracpartial Bpartial T right)_V $$



Note that subscripts denote that the variable is being held constant during the partial differentiation. The problem already told us what our $A$ and $B$ terms are, and I wrote them out explicitly above. Now, we just need to take the appropriate partial differentials and compare. If they are equal, then $mathrmdp$ is exact!



Writing out the formulas took awhile, it seems a shame to stop now... A little bit of differentiating, remembering to hold the appropriate variables constant during differentiation leads to



$$left( fracpartial Apartial V right)_T = -fracRV^2$$



$$left( fracpartial Bpartial T right)_V = -fracRV^2$$



If the two partial derivatives are the same, the differential is exact. I will let you be the judge.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I will figure it out one day, it can't be harder than thermo ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Charlie Crown
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    No worries, many find $mathrmLaTeX$ and mathJax syntax cumbersome and frustrating. There is a good reason for tools like pandoc and wrappers such as bookdown to exist:)
    $endgroup$
    – andselisk
    9 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In my experience people mess up the differentiation and then think they did everything wrong
    $endgroup$
    – Charlie Crown
    9 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Full solutions are fine! We encourage them: chemistry.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4287/…
    $endgroup$
    – orthocresol
    6 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No way around it being a Homework question, but I answered it because there was a time when I had the same question. I tried to provide a means for understanding the solution. The final answer is not that important, but the concept... I hope I showed the concept. If I did, then it is a worthwhile question to have, and solution to have.
    $endgroup$
    – Charlie Crown
    5 hours ago


















3












$begingroup$

For a given function, $F(x,y,z,...)$, it's differential $textdF$ is given by:
$$
textdF = left(fracpartial Fpartial xright)_y,z text d x +left(fracpartial Fpartial yright)_x,z text d y + left(fracpartial Fpartial zright)_x,y text d z +; ...
$$



To say that a differential is an exact differential is to say that is if the differential of a function and hence is of the form given about.



For the case given:



$$
mathrm dp(T,V)=frac RV,mathrm dT+left(frac2aV^2-fracRTV^2right),mathrm dV
$$



If $mathrm dp$ is an exact differential, that would mean that:



$$
left(fracpartial ppartial Tright)_V = frac RV textand left(fracpartial ppartial Vright)_T = left(frac2aV^2-fracRTV^2right)
$$



There are two equivalent way to determine whether this is true, you can integrate the partial derivatives of $p$ to recover a form for $p$, or you can differentiate each term once more to so that both give identical values for the mixed second derivative.



Integration



Taking indefinite integrals of the suspected derivatives:



$$int frac RV mathrm d T = fracRTV + g(V) \
int left(frac2aV^2-fracRTV^2right) mathrm d V = frac-2a+RTV + h(T) \
implies p(T,V) = fracRT-2aV + c
$$



Differentiation



It is typically easier to compare the suspected derivative by differentiation. If $p$ is a true function of $T$ and $V$, by the symmetry of mixed derivatives:



$$
fracpartial partial T _V left(fracpartial p partial V right)_T = fracpartial partial V _T left( fracpartial p partial T right)_V
$$



Assuming:
$$ left(fracpartial ppartial Tright)_V = frac RV \
implies fracpartial partial V _T left( fracpartial p partial T right)_V = -fracRV^2
$$



Assuming



$$ left(fracpartial ppartial Vright)_T = left(frac2aV^2-fracRTV^2right) \
implies fracpartial partial T _V left( fracpartial p partial V right)_T = -fracRV^2
$$



Both terms of the differential $mathrm dp$ imply the same mixed second derivative, hence $mathrm dp$ is an exact differential.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "431"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f110639%2fis-the-differential-dp-exact-or-not%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8












    $begingroup$

    Your function $p$ is a function of the independent variables $V$ and $T$ i.e., $p(V,T)$. The other variables, $a$, and $R$ are constants.



    Let me rewrite the differential as



    $$mathrmdp = A(V)mathrmdT + B(T,V),mathrmdV$$



    where



    $$A(V) = fracRV$$



    and



    $$ B(T,V) = left( frac2aV^3 - fracRTV^2 right) $$



    A differential is exact if



    $$left( fracpartial Apartial V right)_T = left( fracpartial Bpartial T right)_V $$



    Note that subscripts denote that the variable is being held constant during the partial differentiation. The problem already told us what our $A$ and $B$ terms are, and I wrote them out explicitly above. Now, we just need to take the appropriate partial differentials and compare. If they are equal, then $mathrmdp$ is exact!



    Writing out the formulas took awhile, it seems a shame to stop now... A little bit of differentiating, remembering to hold the appropriate variables constant during differentiation leads to



    $$left( fracpartial Apartial V right)_T = -fracRV^2$$



    $$left( fracpartial Bpartial T right)_V = -fracRV^2$$



    If the two partial derivatives are the same, the differential is exact. I will let you be the judge.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I will figure it out one day, it can't be harder than thermo ;)
      $endgroup$
      – Charlie Crown
      9 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      No worries, many find $mathrmLaTeX$ and mathJax syntax cumbersome and frustrating. There is a good reason for tools like pandoc and wrappers such as bookdown to exist:)
      $endgroup$
      – andselisk
      9 hours ago







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      In my experience people mess up the differentiation and then think they did everything wrong
      $endgroup$
      – Charlie Crown
      9 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Full solutions are fine! We encourage them: chemistry.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4287/…
      $endgroup$
      – orthocresol
      6 hours ago







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      No way around it being a Homework question, but I answered it because there was a time when I had the same question. I tried to provide a means for understanding the solution. The final answer is not that important, but the concept... I hope I showed the concept. If I did, then it is a worthwhile question to have, and solution to have.
      $endgroup$
      – Charlie Crown
      5 hours ago















    8












    $begingroup$

    Your function $p$ is a function of the independent variables $V$ and $T$ i.e., $p(V,T)$. The other variables, $a$, and $R$ are constants.



    Let me rewrite the differential as



    $$mathrmdp = A(V)mathrmdT + B(T,V),mathrmdV$$



    where



    $$A(V) = fracRV$$



    and



    $$ B(T,V) = left( frac2aV^3 - fracRTV^2 right) $$



    A differential is exact if



    $$left( fracpartial Apartial V right)_T = left( fracpartial Bpartial T right)_V $$



    Note that subscripts denote that the variable is being held constant during the partial differentiation. The problem already told us what our $A$ and $B$ terms are, and I wrote them out explicitly above. Now, we just need to take the appropriate partial differentials and compare. If they are equal, then $mathrmdp$ is exact!



    Writing out the formulas took awhile, it seems a shame to stop now... A little bit of differentiating, remembering to hold the appropriate variables constant during differentiation leads to



    $$left( fracpartial Apartial V right)_T = -fracRV^2$$



    $$left( fracpartial Bpartial T right)_V = -fracRV^2$$



    If the two partial derivatives are the same, the differential is exact. I will let you be the judge.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I will figure it out one day, it can't be harder than thermo ;)
      $endgroup$
      – Charlie Crown
      9 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      No worries, many find $mathrmLaTeX$ and mathJax syntax cumbersome and frustrating. There is a good reason for tools like pandoc and wrappers such as bookdown to exist:)
      $endgroup$
      – andselisk
      9 hours ago







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      In my experience people mess up the differentiation and then think they did everything wrong
      $endgroup$
      – Charlie Crown
      9 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Full solutions are fine! We encourage them: chemistry.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4287/…
      $endgroup$
      – orthocresol
      6 hours ago







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      No way around it being a Homework question, but I answered it because there was a time when I had the same question. I tried to provide a means for understanding the solution. The final answer is not that important, but the concept... I hope I showed the concept. If I did, then it is a worthwhile question to have, and solution to have.
      $endgroup$
      – Charlie Crown
      5 hours ago













    8












    8








    8





    $begingroup$

    Your function $p$ is a function of the independent variables $V$ and $T$ i.e., $p(V,T)$. The other variables, $a$, and $R$ are constants.



    Let me rewrite the differential as



    $$mathrmdp = A(V)mathrmdT + B(T,V),mathrmdV$$



    where



    $$A(V) = fracRV$$



    and



    $$ B(T,V) = left( frac2aV^3 - fracRTV^2 right) $$



    A differential is exact if



    $$left( fracpartial Apartial V right)_T = left( fracpartial Bpartial T right)_V $$



    Note that subscripts denote that the variable is being held constant during the partial differentiation. The problem already told us what our $A$ and $B$ terms are, and I wrote them out explicitly above. Now, we just need to take the appropriate partial differentials and compare. If they are equal, then $mathrmdp$ is exact!



    Writing out the formulas took awhile, it seems a shame to stop now... A little bit of differentiating, remembering to hold the appropriate variables constant during differentiation leads to



    $$left( fracpartial Apartial V right)_T = -fracRV^2$$



    $$left( fracpartial Bpartial T right)_V = -fracRV^2$$



    If the two partial derivatives are the same, the differential is exact. I will let you be the judge.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Your function $p$ is a function of the independent variables $V$ and $T$ i.e., $p(V,T)$. The other variables, $a$, and $R$ are constants.



    Let me rewrite the differential as



    $$mathrmdp = A(V)mathrmdT + B(T,V),mathrmdV$$



    where



    $$A(V) = fracRV$$



    and



    $$ B(T,V) = left( frac2aV^3 - fracRTV^2 right) $$



    A differential is exact if



    $$left( fracpartial Apartial V right)_T = left( fracpartial Bpartial T right)_V $$



    Note that subscripts denote that the variable is being held constant during the partial differentiation. The problem already told us what our $A$ and $B$ terms are, and I wrote them out explicitly above. Now, we just need to take the appropriate partial differentials and compare. If they are equal, then $mathrmdp$ is exact!



    Writing out the formulas took awhile, it seems a shame to stop now... A little bit of differentiating, remembering to hold the appropriate variables constant during differentiation leads to



    $$left( fracpartial Apartial V right)_T = -fracRV^2$$



    $$left( fracpartial Bpartial T right)_V = -fracRV^2$$



    If the two partial derivatives are the same, the differential is exact. I will let you be the judge.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 6 hours ago









    orthocresol

    39.4k7114241




    39.4k7114241










    answered 10 hours ago









    Charlie CrownCharlie Crown

    368114




    368114







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I will figure it out one day, it can't be harder than thermo ;)
      $endgroup$
      – Charlie Crown
      9 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      No worries, many find $mathrmLaTeX$ and mathJax syntax cumbersome and frustrating. There is a good reason for tools like pandoc and wrappers such as bookdown to exist:)
      $endgroup$
      – andselisk
      9 hours ago







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      In my experience people mess up the differentiation and then think they did everything wrong
      $endgroup$
      – Charlie Crown
      9 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Full solutions are fine! We encourage them: chemistry.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4287/…
      $endgroup$
      – orthocresol
      6 hours ago







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      No way around it being a Homework question, but I answered it because there was a time when I had the same question. I tried to provide a means for understanding the solution. The final answer is not that important, but the concept... I hope I showed the concept. If I did, then it is a worthwhile question to have, and solution to have.
      $endgroup$
      – Charlie Crown
      5 hours ago












    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I will figure it out one day, it can't be harder than thermo ;)
      $endgroup$
      – Charlie Crown
      9 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      No worries, many find $mathrmLaTeX$ and mathJax syntax cumbersome and frustrating. There is a good reason for tools like pandoc and wrappers such as bookdown to exist:)
      $endgroup$
      – andselisk
      9 hours ago







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      In my experience people mess up the differentiation and then think they did everything wrong
      $endgroup$
      – Charlie Crown
      9 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Full solutions are fine! We encourage them: chemistry.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4287/…
      $endgroup$
      – orthocresol
      6 hours ago







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      No way around it being a Homework question, but I answered it because there was a time when I had the same question. I tried to provide a means for understanding the solution. The final answer is not that important, but the concept... I hope I showed the concept. If I did, then it is a worthwhile question to have, and solution to have.
      $endgroup$
      – Charlie Crown
      5 hours ago







    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    I will figure it out one day, it can't be harder than thermo ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Charlie Crown
    9 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    I will figure it out one day, it can't be harder than thermo ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Charlie Crown
    9 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    No worries, many find $mathrmLaTeX$ and mathJax syntax cumbersome and frustrating. There is a good reason for tools like pandoc and wrappers such as bookdown to exist:)
    $endgroup$
    – andselisk
    9 hours ago





    $begingroup$
    No worries, many find $mathrmLaTeX$ and mathJax syntax cumbersome and frustrating. There is a good reason for tools like pandoc and wrappers such as bookdown to exist:)
    $endgroup$
    – andselisk
    9 hours ago





    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    In my experience people mess up the differentiation and then think they did everything wrong
    $endgroup$
    – Charlie Crown
    9 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    In my experience people mess up the differentiation and then think they did everything wrong
    $endgroup$
    – Charlie Crown
    9 hours ago




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    Full solutions are fine! We encourage them: chemistry.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4287/…
    $endgroup$
    – orthocresol
    6 hours ago





    $begingroup$
    Full solutions are fine! We encourage them: chemistry.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4287/…
    $endgroup$
    – orthocresol
    6 hours ago





    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    No way around it being a Homework question, but I answered it because there was a time when I had the same question. I tried to provide a means for understanding the solution. The final answer is not that important, but the concept... I hope I showed the concept. If I did, then it is a worthwhile question to have, and solution to have.
    $endgroup$
    – Charlie Crown
    5 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    No way around it being a Homework question, but I answered it because there was a time when I had the same question. I tried to provide a means for understanding the solution. The final answer is not that important, but the concept... I hope I showed the concept. If I did, then it is a worthwhile question to have, and solution to have.
    $endgroup$
    – Charlie Crown
    5 hours ago











    3












    $begingroup$

    For a given function, $F(x,y,z,...)$, it's differential $textdF$ is given by:
    $$
    textdF = left(fracpartial Fpartial xright)_y,z text d x +left(fracpartial Fpartial yright)_x,z text d y + left(fracpartial Fpartial zright)_x,y text d z +; ...
    $$



    To say that a differential is an exact differential is to say that is if the differential of a function and hence is of the form given about.



    For the case given:



    $$
    mathrm dp(T,V)=frac RV,mathrm dT+left(frac2aV^2-fracRTV^2right),mathrm dV
    $$



    If $mathrm dp$ is an exact differential, that would mean that:



    $$
    left(fracpartial ppartial Tright)_V = frac RV textand left(fracpartial ppartial Vright)_T = left(frac2aV^2-fracRTV^2right)
    $$



    There are two equivalent way to determine whether this is true, you can integrate the partial derivatives of $p$ to recover a form for $p$, or you can differentiate each term once more to so that both give identical values for the mixed second derivative.



    Integration



    Taking indefinite integrals of the suspected derivatives:



    $$int frac RV mathrm d T = fracRTV + g(V) \
    int left(frac2aV^2-fracRTV^2right) mathrm d V = frac-2a+RTV + h(T) \
    implies p(T,V) = fracRT-2aV + c
    $$



    Differentiation



    It is typically easier to compare the suspected derivative by differentiation. If $p$ is a true function of $T$ and $V$, by the symmetry of mixed derivatives:



    $$
    fracpartial partial T _V left(fracpartial p partial V right)_T = fracpartial partial V _T left( fracpartial p partial T right)_V
    $$



    Assuming:
    $$ left(fracpartial ppartial Tright)_V = frac RV \
    implies fracpartial partial V _T left( fracpartial p partial T right)_V = -fracRV^2
    $$



    Assuming



    $$ left(fracpartial ppartial Vright)_T = left(frac2aV^2-fracRTV^2right) \
    implies fracpartial partial T _V left( fracpartial p partial V right)_T = -fracRV^2
    $$



    Both terms of the differential $mathrm dp$ imply the same mixed second derivative, hence $mathrm dp$ is an exact differential.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      3












      $begingroup$

      For a given function, $F(x,y,z,...)$, it's differential $textdF$ is given by:
      $$
      textdF = left(fracpartial Fpartial xright)_y,z text d x +left(fracpartial Fpartial yright)_x,z text d y + left(fracpartial Fpartial zright)_x,y text d z +; ...
      $$



      To say that a differential is an exact differential is to say that is if the differential of a function and hence is of the form given about.



      For the case given:



      $$
      mathrm dp(T,V)=frac RV,mathrm dT+left(frac2aV^2-fracRTV^2right),mathrm dV
      $$



      If $mathrm dp$ is an exact differential, that would mean that:



      $$
      left(fracpartial ppartial Tright)_V = frac RV textand left(fracpartial ppartial Vright)_T = left(frac2aV^2-fracRTV^2right)
      $$



      There are two equivalent way to determine whether this is true, you can integrate the partial derivatives of $p$ to recover a form for $p$, or you can differentiate each term once more to so that both give identical values for the mixed second derivative.



      Integration



      Taking indefinite integrals of the suspected derivatives:



      $$int frac RV mathrm d T = fracRTV + g(V) \
      int left(frac2aV^2-fracRTV^2right) mathrm d V = frac-2a+RTV + h(T) \
      implies p(T,V) = fracRT-2aV + c
      $$



      Differentiation



      It is typically easier to compare the suspected derivative by differentiation. If $p$ is a true function of $T$ and $V$, by the symmetry of mixed derivatives:



      $$
      fracpartial partial T _V left(fracpartial p partial V right)_T = fracpartial partial V _T left( fracpartial p partial T right)_V
      $$



      Assuming:
      $$ left(fracpartial ppartial Tright)_V = frac RV \
      implies fracpartial partial V _T left( fracpartial p partial T right)_V = -fracRV^2
      $$



      Assuming



      $$ left(fracpartial ppartial Vright)_T = left(frac2aV^2-fracRTV^2right) \
      implies fracpartial partial T _V left( fracpartial p partial V right)_T = -fracRV^2
      $$



      Both terms of the differential $mathrm dp$ imply the same mixed second derivative, hence $mathrm dp$ is an exact differential.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        For a given function, $F(x,y,z,...)$, it's differential $textdF$ is given by:
        $$
        textdF = left(fracpartial Fpartial xright)_y,z text d x +left(fracpartial Fpartial yright)_x,z text d y + left(fracpartial Fpartial zright)_x,y text d z +; ...
        $$



        To say that a differential is an exact differential is to say that is if the differential of a function and hence is of the form given about.



        For the case given:



        $$
        mathrm dp(T,V)=frac RV,mathrm dT+left(frac2aV^2-fracRTV^2right),mathrm dV
        $$



        If $mathrm dp$ is an exact differential, that would mean that:



        $$
        left(fracpartial ppartial Tright)_V = frac RV textand left(fracpartial ppartial Vright)_T = left(frac2aV^2-fracRTV^2right)
        $$



        There are two equivalent way to determine whether this is true, you can integrate the partial derivatives of $p$ to recover a form for $p$, or you can differentiate each term once more to so that both give identical values for the mixed second derivative.



        Integration



        Taking indefinite integrals of the suspected derivatives:



        $$int frac RV mathrm d T = fracRTV + g(V) \
        int left(frac2aV^2-fracRTV^2right) mathrm d V = frac-2a+RTV + h(T) \
        implies p(T,V) = fracRT-2aV + c
        $$



        Differentiation



        It is typically easier to compare the suspected derivative by differentiation. If $p$ is a true function of $T$ and $V$, by the symmetry of mixed derivatives:



        $$
        fracpartial partial T _V left(fracpartial p partial V right)_T = fracpartial partial V _T left( fracpartial p partial T right)_V
        $$



        Assuming:
        $$ left(fracpartial ppartial Tright)_V = frac RV \
        implies fracpartial partial V _T left( fracpartial p partial T right)_V = -fracRV^2
        $$



        Assuming



        $$ left(fracpartial ppartial Vright)_T = left(frac2aV^2-fracRTV^2right) \
        implies fracpartial partial T _V left( fracpartial p partial V right)_T = -fracRV^2
        $$



        Both terms of the differential $mathrm dp$ imply the same mixed second derivative, hence $mathrm dp$ is an exact differential.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        For a given function, $F(x,y,z,...)$, it's differential $textdF$ is given by:
        $$
        textdF = left(fracpartial Fpartial xright)_y,z text d x +left(fracpartial Fpartial yright)_x,z text d y + left(fracpartial Fpartial zright)_x,y text d z +; ...
        $$



        To say that a differential is an exact differential is to say that is if the differential of a function and hence is of the form given about.



        For the case given:



        $$
        mathrm dp(T,V)=frac RV,mathrm dT+left(frac2aV^2-fracRTV^2right),mathrm dV
        $$



        If $mathrm dp$ is an exact differential, that would mean that:



        $$
        left(fracpartial ppartial Tright)_V = frac RV textand left(fracpartial ppartial Vright)_T = left(frac2aV^2-fracRTV^2right)
        $$



        There are two equivalent way to determine whether this is true, you can integrate the partial derivatives of $p$ to recover a form for $p$, or you can differentiate each term once more to so that both give identical values for the mixed second derivative.



        Integration



        Taking indefinite integrals of the suspected derivatives:



        $$int frac RV mathrm d T = fracRTV + g(V) \
        int left(frac2aV^2-fracRTV^2right) mathrm d V = frac-2a+RTV + h(T) \
        implies p(T,V) = fracRT-2aV + c
        $$



        Differentiation



        It is typically easier to compare the suspected derivative by differentiation. If $p$ is a true function of $T$ and $V$, by the symmetry of mixed derivatives:



        $$
        fracpartial partial T _V left(fracpartial p partial V right)_T = fracpartial partial V _T left( fracpartial p partial T right)_V
        $$



        Assuming:
        $$ left(fracpartial ppartial Tright)_V = frac RV \
        implies fracpartial partial V _T left( fracpartial p partial T right)_V = -fracRV^2
        $$



        Assuming



        $$ left(fracpartial ppartial Vright)_T = left(frac2aV^2-fracRTV^2right) \
        implies fracpartial partial T _V left( fracpartial p partial V right)_T = -fracRV^2
        $$



        Both terms of the differential $mathrm dp$ imply the same mixed second derivative, hence $mathrm dp$ is an exact differential.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 4 hours ago









        user213305user213305

        946416




        946416



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f110639%2fis-the-differential-dp-exact-or-not%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god existsWord for having a definite opinion while simultaneously withholding judgment?What's the opposite of “newcomer? Is ”veteran" OK?What do you call an “atheist” who might believe in an afterlife?What's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Word for someone who dismisses contrary opinions as irrational?Somone who thinks they are overly special/out of the ordinaryIs there a word, phrase or idiom for “a person who is incapable of thinking about the future”?The belief that a god is human-likeA word for a non-famous person/thing you have heard a lot aboutAdjective for a person who enjoys taking care of their appearance

            What was this official D&D 3.5e Lovecraft-flavored rulebook?What was this set of RPG tools called?As a first-time DM should I let my players play complex character classes and roles?Nymph's Kiss and the RelationshipWhat was the name of this Cleric Prestige Class that shapes metal with its bare hands?Are the 3.5e Dragonlance books third party or official works?What's up with the domain Vile Darkness?What was this 80s book about RPGs?What was the name of this Werewolf band?What book had Rituals to “upgrade” animal companions to keep them viable at higher levels?What was this RPG that had rules for player-owned businesses?

            2017 IndyCar Series Contents Series news Teams and drivers Schedule Season summary Footnotes References External links Navigation menu"INDYCAR: Initial 2018 bodywork concepts unveiled"the original"IndyCar confirms switch to Performance Friction brakes in 2017""AJ Foyt Racing will switch to Chevy"the original"Carlos Munoz, Conor Daly will drive for AJ Foyt Racing""Zach Veach's Indy 500 Debut Confirmed with Foyt""No mass exodus from Honda after Ganassi switch""Ex-F1 driver Sato joins Andretti Autosport for 2017 IndyCar season""IndyCar's Ryan Hunter-Reay, sponsor DHL paired through 2020""hhgregg and Andretti Autosport announce partnership for key races in 2016""INDYCAR: Rossi re-signs with Andretti"the original"McLaren Formula 1 - Fernando Alonso to race at Indy 500 with McLaren, Honda and Andretti Autosport""Shank will finally take part in Indy 500 with Harvey, Andretti | MotorSportsTalk""Andretti adds Jack Harvey to Indy 500 field""Ganassi switches to Honda power for 2017""INDYCAR: Chilton returns to Ganassi"the original"IndyCar silly season: Who's going where in 2017?""INDYCAR: Kanaan, NTT Data return to Ganassi"the original"Kimball to remain at Ganassi for 2017""Coyne confirms Bourdais for 2017 IndyCar season""Davison to sub for Bourdais in Indy 500"the original"Gutierrez confirmed for Detroit IndyCar debut""Gutierrez returns with Coyne for rest of 2017 season""Vautier to drive for Coyne at Texas"the original"INDYCAR: Coyne confirms Jones for 2017"the original"Pippa Mann returns to Coyne for Indy 500""Karam, Dreyer & Reinbold teaming up again for Indianapolis 500""Pigot to return to Ed Carpenter Racing""Hildebrand confirmed as full-time Ed Carpenter driver""Veach to replace injured Hildebrand at Barber"the originalNew Team Harding Racing Enters Chaves for 101st Indianapolis 500"Juncos Racing Announces Entry in 101st Running of the Indianapolis 500 :: Juncos Racing""Juncos confirms Pigot for Indy 500""Saavedra confirmed in Juncos' second 500 entry"the original"Lazier confirms Indy 500 run after son's USF2000 debut"the original"Claman DeMelo to race for RLLR at Sonoma"the original"Rahal signs Servia and ace engineer for 2017""IndyCar: Aleshin returns with Schmidt"the original"Aleshin replaced by Saavedra for Toronto""Jack Harvey will pilot SPM No. 7 car at Watkins Glen, Sonoma""Jay Howard confirmed in Tony Stewart's supported SPM Indy entry""INDYCAR: Newgarden to wave the flag at Penske"the original"Pagenaud opts for No. 1 in 2017"the original"Penske confirms Newgarden for 2017""Montoya to stay with Team Penske in 2017""Target leaving IndyCar after 27 seasons with Chip Ganassi""Cavin: IndyCar could see complete driver/team shakeup in 2017""End of the road for KV Racing?""KV Racing confirms closure, equipment sold to Juncos""Juncos confirms IndyCar Series entry"the original"Juncos readies IndyCar program, aims for '17 500"the original"Harding Racing to add Texas, Pocono to schedule"the original"Sato signs with Andretti Autosport for 2017""INDYCAR: Aleshin in Doubt at SPM"the original"Long Beach notebook: JR Hildebrand breaks hand""Hildebrand cleared to return at Phoenix"the original"Bourdais to undergo surgery on multiple fractures""Aleshin loses Schmidt Peterson IndyCar ride""Saavedra in at SPM for Pocono, Gateway"the original"Bourdais to make return at Gateway"the original"The IndyCar Grand Prix no longer is sponsored by Angie's List""2017 IndyCar Series rulebook""2017 Verizon IndyCar Series Official Rulebook"Official websiteeeeee