Hocutt v. Wilson Background References Navigation menu"Brown v. Board at Fifty: "With an Even Hand": A Century of Racial Segregation"23522330"Brown v. Board at Fifty: "With an Even Hand""e

Journey of ReconciliationMurder of Harry and Harriette MooreBrown v. Board of EducationBolling v. SharpeBriggs v. ElliottDavis v. County School Board of Prince Edward CountyGebhart v. BeltonWhite America, Inc.Sarah Keys v. Carolina Coach CompanyEmmett TillMontgomery bus boycottBrowder v. GayleTallahassee bus boycottMansfield school desegregation1957 Prayer Pilgrimage for FreedomGive Us the BallotRoyal Ice Cream sit-inLittle Rock NineNational Guard blockadeCivil Rights Act of 1957Kissing CaseBiloxi wade-insGreensboro sit-insNashville sit-insSit-in movementCivil Rights Act of 1960Gomillion v. LightfootBoynton v. VirginiaRock Hill sit-insRobert F. Kennedy's Law Day AddressFreedom RidesattacksGarner v. LouisianaAlbany MovementUniversity of Chicago sit-insSecond Emancipation ProclamationMeredith enrollment, Ole Miss riot"Segregation now, segregation forever"Stand in the Schoolhouse Door1963 Birmingham campaignLetter from Birmingham JailChildren's CrusadeBirmingham riot16th Street Baptist Church bombingJohn F. Kennedy's Report to the American People on Civil RightsMarch on Washington"I Have a Dream"St. Augustine movementTwenty-fourth AmendmentBloody TuesdayFreedom Summerworkers' murdersCivil Rights Act of 19641965 Selma to Montgomery marchesHow Long, Not LongVoting Rights Act of 1965Harper v. Virginia Board of ElectionsMarch Against FearWhite House Conference on Civil RightsChicago Freedom Movement/Chicago open housing movementMemphis sanitation strikeKing assassinationfuneralriotsPoor People's CampaignCivil Rights Act of 1968Green v. County School Board of New Kent CountyAlabama Christian Movement for Human RightsAtlanta Student MovementBrotherhood of Sleeping Car PortersCongress of Racial Equality (CORE)Committee on Appeal for Human RightsCouncil for United Civil Rights LeadershipCouncil of Federated OrganizationsDallas County Voters LeagueDeacons for Defense and JusticeGeorgia Council on Human RelationsHighlander Folk SchoolLeadership Conference on Civil and Human RightsMontgomery Improvement AssociationNashville Student MovementNAACPYouth CouncilNorthern Student MovementNational Council of Negro WomenNational Urban LeagueOperation BreadbasketRegional Council of Negro LeadershipSouthern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC)Southern Regional CouncilStudent Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC)The Freedom SingersWednesdays in MississippiWomen's Political CouncilNonviolencePadayatraSermon on the MountMahatma GandhiAhimsaSatyagrahaThe Kingdom of God Is Within YouFrederick DouglassW. E. B. Du BoisMary McLeod BethuneIn popular cultureMartin Luther King Jr. MemorialBirmingham Civil Rights National MonumentFreedom Riders National MonumentCivil Rights MemorialOther King memorials


History of North CarolinaHistory of Durham, North Carolina1933 in United States case lawNorth Carolina state case lawUnited States school desegregation case lawUniversity of North Carolina1933 in North CarolinaEducation in Durham, North CarolinaNorth Carolina Central University


desegregatehigher educationUnited StatesAfrican AmericanDurham, North CarolinaNational Association for the Advancement of Colored Peoplelack of standingsegregatedunconstitutionalNorth Carolina College for NegroesNorth Carolina Central UniversityUniversity of North CarolinaNorth Carolinacivil rightsDeep SouthWashington D.C.Howard UniversityBrooklyn Law SchoolWalter Francis WhiteMargold ReportdiscriminationHarvard




American desegregation case


Hocutt v. Wilson, N.C. Super. Ct. (1933) (unreported), was the first attempt to desegregate higher education in the United States.[1] It was initiated by two African American lawyers from Durham, North Carolina, Conrad O. Pearson and Cecil McCoy, with the support of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP).[2] The case was ultimately dismissed for lack of standing, but it served as a test case for challenging the "separate but equal" doctrine in education and was a precursor to Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) (holding that segregated public schools were unconstitutional).[3]



Background


Students at the North Carolina College for Negroes, which is now North Carolina Central University in Durham, were plaintiffs in desegregation suits against the all-white University of North Carolina system.[4]North Carolina was an ideal place for civil rights work because Durham had a generally non-violent racial status quo, the state was slightly more progressive than other Deep South states, and it was close to Washington D.C., where Charles Hamilton Houston taught the most prominent civil rights lawyers.[5] The plaintiff was Thomas Hocutt, a 24 year old student at the North Carolina College for Negroes who in March 1933 sought admission to the pharmacy school at the University of North Carolina.[6][7] Conrad Odell Pearson and Cecil McCoy brought the case in February 1933.[8]


Pearson graduated from Howard University's law school under Charles Hamilton Houston and began practicing in Durham in 1932. McCoy graduated from Brooklyn Law School in 1931 and also practiced in Durham.[9] Initially, Pearson and McCoy wrote to NAACP General Secretary Walter Francis White for financial support. White ratified the case and sent a copy of the Margold Report[10] on discrimination in public schools to support the attorneys.[9] The NAACP also sent Harvard-educated William Hastie to assist Pearson and McCoy on the case.[11] At the trial, Hastie became the lead lawyer.


The suit did not have the support of many black leaders in Durham. But it was supported by Louis Austin, the editor of the major black owned newspaper, The Carolina Times. The white-owned newspaper, Durham Morning Herald warned, "[t]o our way of thinking, [Pearson and McCoy] will find in the end that they have won not a victory but a costly defeat."[12] Additionally, James E. Shepard, president and founder of North Carolina College for Negroes (now North Carolina Central University) did not support the lawsuit, because he wanted the state to fund graduate programs for black students at his university. Shepard refused to release Hocutt's transcript.[13]


When Hastie, Pearson and McCoy failed to present an official transcript, Hocutt no longer satisfied the admission requirements for the Pharmacy School and the case was dismissed.[14] Despite defeat, the Hocutt case laid the groundwork for subsequent civil rights cases that challenged racial segregation in public education, leading to the landmark Brown v. Board of Education (1954) decision, which ruled that racially segregated public schools were unconstitutional.



References




  1. ^ "Brown v. Board at Fifty: "With an Even Hand": A Century of Racial Segregation". Library of Congress. 1849–1950. Retrieved 2013-04-24..mw-parser-output cite.citationfont-style:inherit.mw-parser-output .citation qquotes:"""""""'""'".mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-free abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/65/Lock-green.svg/9px-Lock-green.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-registration abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d6/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-gray-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-subscription abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/aa/Lock-red-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-red-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registrationcolor:#555.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription span,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration spanborder-bottom:1px dotted;cursor:help.mw-parser-output .cs1-ws-icon abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4c/Wikisource-logo.svg/12px-Wikisource-logo.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output code.cs1-codecolor:inherit;background:inherit;border:inherit;padding:inherit.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-errordisplay:none;font-size:100%.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-errorfont-size:100%.mw-parser-output .cs1-maintdisplay:none;color:#33aa33;margin-left:0.3em.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration,.mw-parser-output .cs1-formatfont-size:95%.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-leftpadding-left:0.2em.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-rightpadding-right:0.2em


  2. ^ The Center For Urban Affairs, North Carolina State University, Paths Toward Freedom: A Bibliographical History of Blacks and Indians in North Carolina by Blacks and Indians 172 (1976).


  3. ^ See, Durham Civil Rights Leader and Lawyer, Pearson, Dies, Durham Morning Herald, June 27, 1984, at 1A.


  4. ^ Samuel R. Diamont, Local Civil Rights Litigators: Durham's African American Attorneys 1933-1954, 21 (2008) (published Ph.D. dissertation, North Carolina Central University) (on file with North Carolina Central University Archives Department).


  5. ^ Id. at 31.


  6. ^ Id. at 30.


  7. ^ Jerry Gershenhorn (July 2001). Hocutt v. Wilson and Race Relations in Durham, North Carolina, during the 1930s. State Archives of North Carolina. JSTOR 23522330.


  8. ^ University of North Carolina, Documenting the American South, Oral History Interview with Conrad Odell Pearson, April 18, 1979. Interview H-0218. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007), http://docsouth.unc.edu/sohp/H-0218/menu.html.


  9. ^ ab Diamont, supra note 4, at 30.


  10. ^ Nathan R. Margold, Preliminary Report to the Joint Committee Supervising the Expenditure of the 1930 Appropriation by the American Fund for Public Service (1931).


  11. ^ Id. at 32.


  12. ^ Leslie Brown, Upbuilding Black Durham: Gender, Class, and Black Community Development in the Jim Crow South 310 (2008) quoting Editorial, Durham Morning Herald, Feb. 1933, at 21, 24.


  13. ^ "Brown v. Board at Fifty: "With an Even Hand"". Library of Congress. Retrieved 2015-09-11.


  14. ^ Id. at 33.








1933 in North Carolina, 1933 in United States case law, Education in Durham, History of Durham, History of North Carolina, North Carolina, North Carolina Central University, North Carolina state case law, United States school desegregation case law, University of North CarolinaUncategorized

Popular posts from this blog

Frič See also Navigation menuinternal link

Identify plant with long narrow paired leaves and reddish stems Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?What is this plant with long sharp leaves? Is it a weed?What is this 3ft high, stalky plant, with mid sized narrow leaves?What is this young shrub with opposite ovate, crenate leaves and reddish stems?What is this plant with large broad serrated leaves?Identify this upright branching weed with long leaves and reddish stemsPlease help me identify this bulbous plant with long, broad leaves and white flowersWhat is this small annual with narrow gray/green leaves and rust colored daisy-type flowers?What is this chilli plant?Does anyone know what type of chilli plant this is?Help identify this plant

fontconfig warning: “/etc/fonts/fonts.conf”, line 100: unknown “element blank” The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In“tar: unrecognized option --warning” during 'apt-get install'How to fix Fontconfig errorHow do I figure out which font file is chosen for a system generic font alias?Why are some apt-get-installed fonts being ignored by fc-list, xfontsel, etc?Reload settings in /etc/fonts/conf.dTaking 30 seconds longer to boot after upgrade from jessie to stretchHow to match multiple font names with a single <match> element?Adding a custom font to fontconfigRemoving fonts from fontconfig <match> resultsBroken fonts after upgrading Firefox ESR to latest Firefox