What are necessary users used for2019 Community Moderator Electionwhich default Debian groups are safe to delete?What is the bin user for?Renaming the system users bin and man without doing harm?Allow a user to read some other users' home directoriesCan Process id and session id of a daemon differ?Is it allowed to assign one range of subordinate IDs to two different users?How to fully manage users and groups with web GUI and create templates for new users?Automatically set file group and permissions not by inheriting from a directoryHow are new user IDs calculated automatically by default in Linux?Prevent users from changing group of their own filesLimiting RAM for a group of users on Ubuntu MachineIn `/etc/passwd`, can different usernames for the same user ID have different group IDs?

Examples of a statistic that is not independent of sample's distribution?

How to draw cubes in a 3 dimensional plane

How can I ensure my trip to the UK will not have to be cancelled because of Brexit?

What's the "normal" opposite of flautando?

List elements digit difference sort

Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god exists

Vocabulary for giving just numbers, not a full answer

Does the nature of the Apocalypse in The Umbrella Academy change from the first to the last episode?

Contract Factories

What problems would a superhuman have whose skin is constantly hot?

What are the threaded holes in Manfrotto camera brackets?

How to secure an aircraft at a transient parking space?

Do I really need to have a scientific explanation for my premise?

In the late 1940’s to early 1950’s what technology was available that could melt a LOT of ice?

What are actual Tesla M60 models used by AWS?

Conservation of Mass and Energy

Why would one plane in this picture not have gear down yet?

Should I take out a loan for a friend to invest on my behalf?

PTIJ: wiping amalek’s memory?

Latex does not go to next line

Reversed Sudoku

Good for you! in Russian

An alternative proof of an application of Hahn-Banach

Does this video of collapsing warehouse shelves show a real incident?



What are necessary users used for



2019 Community Moderator Electionwhich default Debian groups are safe to delete?What is the bin user for?Renaming the system users bin and man without doing harm?Allow a user to read some other users' home directoriesCan Process id and session id of a daemon differ?Is it allowed to assign one range of subordinate IDs to two different users?How to fully manage users and groups with web GUI and create templates for new users?Automatically set file group and permissions not by inheriting from a directoryHow are new user IDs calculated automatically by default in Linux?Prevent users from changing group of their own filesLimiting RAM for a group of users on Ubuntu MachineIn `/etc/passwd`, can different usernames for the same user ID have different group IDs?










0















I want to know which users are necessary for an Unix/Linux system. Now I found a doc which told me that there were three necessary users: root, bin and daemon.



For the user bin and the user daemon, I still can't understand what they are used for. Here is how the doc described them:




Notes: The bin User ID/Group ID is included for compatibility with
legacy applications. New applications should no longer use the bin
User ID/Group ID.

The daemon User ID/Group ID was used as an
unprivileged User ID/Group ID for daemons to execute under in order to
limit their access to the system. Generally daemons should now run
under individual User ID/Group IDs in order to further partition
daemons from one another.











share|improve this question
























  • No other user than root is necessary. What is your goal?

    – Kusalananda
    Nov 28 '18 at 9:52











  • @Kusalananda My goal is to know which users are necessary, meaning that which users can't be removed otherwise the system will not work.

    – Yves
    Nov 28 '18 at 10:19















0















I want to know which users are necessary for an Unix/Linux system. Now I found a doc which told me that there were three necessary users: root, bin and daemon.



For the user bin and the user daemon, I still can't understand what they are used for. Here is how the doc described them:




Notes: The bin User ID/Group ID is included for compatibility with
legacy applications. New applications should no longer use the bin
User ID/Group ID.

The daemon User ID/Group ID was used as an
unprivileged User ID/Group ID for daemons to execute under in order to
limit their access to the system. Generally daemons should now run
under individual User ID/Group IDs in order to further partition
daemons from one another.











share|improve this question
























  • No other user than root is necessary. What is your goal?

    – Kusalananda
    Nov 28 '18 at 9:52











  • @Kusalananda My goal is to know which users are necessary, meaning that which users can't be removed otherwise the system will not work.

    – Yves
    Nov 28 '18 at 10:19













0












0








0








I want to know which users are necessary for an Unix/Linux system. Now I found a doc which told me that there were three necessary users: root, bin and daemon.



For the user bin and the user daemon, I still can't understand what they are used for. Here is how the doc described them:




Notes: The bin User ID/Group ID is included for compatibility with
legacy applications. New applications should no longer use the bin
User ID/Group ID.

The daemon User ID/Group ID was used as an
unprivileged User ID/Group ID for daemons to execute under in order to
limit their access to the system. Generally daemons should now run
under individual User ID/Group IDs in order to further partition
daemons from one another.











share|improve this question
















I want to know which users are necessary for an Unix/Linux system. Now I found a doc which told me that there were three necessary users: root, bin and daemon.



For the user bin and the user daemon, I still can't understand what they are used for. Here is how the doc described them:




Notes: The bin User ID/Group ID is included for compatibility with
legacy applications. New applications should no longer use the bin
User ID/Group ID.

The daemon User ID/Group ID was used as an
unprivileged User ID/Group ID for daemons to execute under in order to
limit their access to the system. Generally daemons should now run
under individual User ID/Group IDs in order to further partition
daemons from one another.








linux users daemon






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 28 '18 at 9:55









Stephen Kitt

175k24400478




175k24400478










asked Nov 28 '18 at 9:44









YvesYves

922722




922722












  • No other user than root is necessary. What is your goal?

    – Kusalananda
    Nov 28 '18 at 9:52











  • @Kusalananda My goal is to know which users are necessary, meaning that which users can't be removed otherwise the system will not work.

    – Yves
    Nov 28 '18 at 10:19

















  • No other user than root is necessary. What is your goal?

    – Kusalananda
    Nov 28 '18 at 9:52











  • @Kusalananda My goal is to know which users are necessary, meaning that which users can't be removed otherwise the system will not work.

    – Yves
    Nov 28 '18 at 10:19
















No other user than root is necessary. What is your goal?

– Kusalananda
Nov 28 '18 at 9:52





No other user than root is necessary. What is your goal?

– Kusalananda
Nov 28 '18 at 9:52













@Kusalananda My goal is to know which users are necessary, meaning that which users can't be removed otherwise the system will not work.

– Yves
Nov 28 '18 at 10:19





@Kusalananda My goal is to know which users are necessary, meaning that which users can't be removed otherwise the system will not work.

– Yves
Nov 28 '18 at 10:19










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














What are the bin and daemon users used for?



First, note that the document you’re referring to is the Linux Standard Base, and it lists requirements for systems to be considered LSB-compliant, not for them to be viable in general.



A long time ago, dæmons ran as root. This was eventually considered to be undesirable, since it meant that any dæmon could do anything it wanted in the system. So the daemon user was introduced: dæmons ran as user daemon, so they were limited to what that user could do.



The reasons for bin are in a similar vein, and have been obsolete for thirty years...



Nowadays, as mentioned in the LSB, they are only present for legacy reasons, i.e. to be able to run ancient software which assumes those users are present. Current software doesn’t need them.



What users are necessary on a Linux/Unix system?



The short answer to that is, whatever users are used by the system.



However, all Linux and Unix-style systems have policies which specify that a certain baseline can be assumed. This includes default system users and groups; see for example Debian Policy (which defines the framework) and the master list of Debian system users. Any Debian package can assume that those users are present: Policy specifies that they are




the same on every Debian system




(although Debian Policy is descriptive, not normative, it does set up a number of assumptions which the rest of Debian relies on).



So you can in theory remove any user and group which your system doesn’t currently use; however that may cause future breakage, as you install new packages or upgrade existing ones. (Admittedly, this is highly unlikely for bin and daemon.)






share|improve this answer
























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484618%2fwhat-are-necessary-users-used-for%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    What are the bin and daemon users used for?



    First, note that the document you’re referring to is the Linux Standard Base, and it lists requirements for systems to be considered LSB-compliant, not for them to be viable in general.



    A long time ago, dæmons ran as root. This was eventually considered to be undesirable, since it meant that any dæmon could do anything it wanted in the system. So the daemon user was introduced: dæmons ran as user daemon, so they were limited to what that user could do.



    The reasons for bin are in a similar vein, and have been obsolete for thirty years...



    Nowadays, as mentioned in the LSB, they are only present for legacy reasons, i.e. to be able to run ancient software which assumes those users are present. Current software doesn’t need them.



    What users are necessary on a Linux/Unix system?



    The short answer to that is, whatever users are used by the system.



    However, all Linux and Unix-style systems have policies which specify that a certain baseline can be assumed. This includes default system users and groups; see for example Debian Policy (which defines the framework) and the master list of Debian system users. Any Debian package can assume that those users are present: Policy specifies that they are




    the same on every Debian system




    (although Debian Policy is descriptive, not normative, it does set up a number of assumptions which the rest of Debian relies on).



    So you can in theory remove any user and group which your system doesn’t currently use; however that may cause future breakage, as you install new packages or upgrade existing ones. (Admittedly, this is highly unlikely for bin and daemon.)






    share|improve this answer





























      2














      What are the bin and daemon users used for?



      First, note that the document you’re referring to is the Linux Standard Base, and it lists requirements for systems to be considered LSB-compliant, not for them to be viable in general.



      A long time ago, dæmons ran as root. This was eventually considered to be undesirable, since it meant that any dæmon could do anything it wanted in the system. So the daemon user was introduced: dæmons ran as user daemon, so they were limited to what that user could do.



      The reasons for bin are in a similar vein, and have been obsolete for thirty years...



      Nowadays, as mentioned in the LSB, they are only present for legacy reasons, i.e. to be able to run ancient software which assumes those users are present. Current software doesn’t need them.



      What users are necessary on a Linux/Unix system?



      The short answer to that is, whatever users are used by the system.



      However, all Linux and Unix-style systems have policies which specify that a certain baseline can be assumed. This includes default system users and groups; see for example Debian Policy (which defines the framework) and the master list of Debian system users. Any Debian package can assume that those users are present: Policy specifies that they are




      the same on every Debian system




      (although Debian Policy is descriptive, not normative, it does set up a number of assumptions which the rest of Debian relies on).



      So you can in theory remove any user and group which your system doesn’t currently use; however that may cause future breakage, as you install new packages or upgrade existing ones. (Admittedly, this is highly unlikely for bin and daemon.)






      share|improve this answer



























        2












        2








        2







        What are the bin and daemon users used for?



        First, note that the document you’re referring to is the Linux Standard Base, and it lists requirements for systems to be considered LSB-compliant, not for them to be viable in general.



        A long time ago, dæmons ran as root. This was eventually considered to be undesirable, since it meant that any dæmon could do anything it wanted in the system. So the daemon user was introduced: dæmons ran as user daemon, so they were limited to what that user could do.



        The reasons for bin are in a similar vein, and have been obsolete for thirty years...



        Nowadays, as mentioned in the LSB, they are only present for legacy reasons, i.e. to be able to run ancient software which assumes those users are present. Current software doesn’t need them.



        What users are necessary on a Linux/Unix system?



        The short answer to that is, whatever users are used by the system.



        However, all Linux and Unix-style systems have policies which specify that a certain baseline can be assumed. This includes default system users and groups; see for example Debian Policy (which defines the framework) and the master list of Debian system users. Any Debian package can assume that those users are present: Policy specifies that they are




        the same on every Debian system




        (although Debian Policy is descriptive, not normative, it does set up a number of assumptions which the rest of Debian relies on).



        So you can in theory remove any user and group which your system doesn’t currently use; however that may cause future breakage, as you install new packages or upgrade existing ones. (Admittedly, this is highly unlikely for bin and daemon.)






        share|improve this answer















        What are the bin and daemon users used for?



        First, note that the document you’re referring to is the Linux Standard Base, and it lists requirements for systems to be considered LSB-compliant, not for them to be viable in general.



        A long time ago, dæmons ran as root. This was eventually considered to be undesirable, since it meant that any dæmon could do anything it wanted in the system. So the daemon user was introduced: dæmons ran as user daemon, so they were limited to what that user could do.



        The reasons for bin are in a similar vein, and have been obsolete for thirty years...



        Nowadays, as mentioned in the LSB, they are only present for legacy reasons, i.e. to be able to run ancient software which assumes those users are present. Current software doesn’t need them.



        What users are necessary on a Linux/Unix system?



        The short answer to that is, whatever users are used by the system.



        However, all Linux and Unix-style systems have policies which specify that a certain baseline can be assumed. This includes default system users and groups; see for example Debian Policy (which defines the framework) and the master list of Debian system users. Any Debian package can assume that those users are present: Policy specifies that they are




        the same on every Debian system




        (although Debian Policy is descriptive, not normative, it does set up a number of assumptions which the rest of Debian relies on).



        So you can in theory remove any user and group which your system doesn’t currently use; however that may cause future breakage, as you install new packages or upgrade existing ones. (Admittedly, this is highly unlikely for bin and daemon.)







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Dec 2 '18 at 15:47

























        answered Nov 28 '18 at 10:34









        Stephen KittStephen Kitt

        175k24400478




        175k24400478



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484618%2fwhat-are-necessary-users-used-for%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -daemon, linux, users

            Popular posts from this blog

            Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god existsWord for having a definite opinion while simultaneously withholding judgment?What's the opposite of “newcomer? Is ”veteran" OK?What do you call an “atheist” who might believe in an afterlife?What's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Word for someone who dismisses contrary opinions as irrational?Somone who thinks they are overly special/out of the ordinaryIs there a word, phrase or idiom for “a person who is incapable of thinking about the future”?The belief that a god is human-likeA word for a non-famous person/thing you have heard a lot aboutAdjective for a person who enjoys taking care of their appearance

            What was this official D&D 3.5e Lovecraft-flavored rulebook?What was this set of RPG tools called?As a first-time DM should I let my players play complex character classes and roles?Nymph's Kiss and the RelationshipWhat was the name of this Cleric Prestige Class that shapes metal with its bare hands?Are the 3.5e Dragonlance books third party or official works?What's up with the domain Vile Darkness?What was this 80s book about RPGs?What was the name of this Werewolf band?What book had Rituals to “upgrade” animal companions to keep them viable at higher levels?What was this RPG that had rules for player-owned businesses?

            2017 IndyCar Series Contents Series news Teams and drivers Schedule Season summary Footnotes References External links Navigation menu"INDYCAR: Initial 2018 bodywork concepts unveiled"the original"IndyCar confirms switch to Performance Friction brakes in 2017""AJ Foyt Racing will switch to Chevy"the original"Carlos Munoz, Conor Daly will drive for AJ Foyt Racing""Zach Veach's Indy 500 Debut Confirmed with Foyt""No mass exodus from Honda after Ganassi switch""Ex-F1 driver Sato joins Andretti Autosport for 2017 IndyCar season""IndyCar's Ryan Hunter-Reay, sponsor DHL paired through 2020""hhgregg and Andretti Autosport announce partnership for key races in 2016""INDYCAR: Rossi re-signs with Andretti"the original"McLaren Formula 1 - Fernando Alonso to race at Indy 500 with McLaren, Honda and Andretti Autosport""Shank will finally take part in Indy 500 with Harvey, Andretti | MotorSportsTalk""Andretti adds Jack Harvey to Indy 500 field""Ganassi switches to Honda power for 2017""INDYCAR: Chilton returns to Ganassi"the original"IndyCar silly season: Who's going where in 2017?""INDYCAR: Kanaan, NTT Data return to Ganassi"the original"Kimball to remain at Ganassi for 2017""Coyne confirms Bourdais for 2017 IndyCar season""Davison to sub for Bourdais in Indy 500"the original"Gutierrez confirmed for Detroit IndyCar debut""Gutierrez returns with Coyne for rest of 2017 season""Vautier to drive for Coyne at Texas"the original"INDYCAR: Coyne confirms Jones for 2017"the original"Pippa Mann returns to Coyne for Indy 500""Karam, Dreyer & Reinbold teaming up again for Indianapolis 500""Pigot to return to Ed Carpenter Racing""Hildebrand confirmed as full-time Ed Carpenter driver""Veach to replace injured Hildebrand at Barber"the originalNew Team Harding Racing Enters Chaves for 101st Indianapolis 500"Juncos Racing Announces Entry in 101st Running of the Indianapolis 500 :: Juncos Racing""Juncos confirms Pigot for Indy 500""Saavedra confirmed in Juncos' second 500 entry"the original"Lazier confirms Indy 500 run after son's USF2000 debut"the original"Claman DeMelo to race for RLLR at Sonoma"the original"Rahal signs Servia and ace engineer for 2017""IndyCar: Aleshin returns with Schmidt"the original"Aleshin replaced by Saavedra for Toronto""Jack Harvey will pilot SPM No. 7 car at Watkins Glen, Sonoma""Jay Howard confirmed in Tony Stewart's supported SPM Indy entry""INDYCAR: Newgarden to wave the flag at Penske"the original"Pagenaud opts for No. 1 in 2017"the original"Penske confirms Newgarden for 2017""Montoya to stay with Team Penske in 2017""Target leaving IndyCar after 27 seasons with Chip Ganassi""Cavin: IndyCar could see complete driver/team shakeup in 2017""End of the road for KV Racing?""KV Racing confirms closure, equipment sold to Juncos""Juncos confirms IndyCar Series entry"the original"Juncos readies IndyCar program, aims for '17 500"the original"Harding Racing to add Texas, Pocono to schedule"the original"Sato signs with Andretti Autosport for 2017""INDYCAR: Aleshin in Doubt at SPM"the original"Long Beach notebook: JR Hildebrand breaks hand""Hildebrand cleared to return at Phoenix"the original"Bourdais to undergo surgery on multiple fractures""Aleshin loses Schmidt Peterson IndyCar ride""Saavedra in at SPM for Pocono, Gateway"the original"Bourdais to make return at Gateway"the original"The IndyCar Grand Prix no longer is sponsored by Angie's List""2017 IndyCar Series rulebook""2017 Verizon IndyCar Series Official Rulebook"Official websiteeeeee