Suggestion on Missing Index CreationHow does SQL Server determine key column order in missing index requests?SQL Server: index creation dateDynamic temporary index creationParent-Child Tree Hierarchical ORDERAdding index to large mysql tablesFirebird Index Creation FailsMySQL Index Creation Internalsdeteriorating stored procedure running timesClustered Index Creationsp_BlitzIndex finding “Unknown” indexClustered index scan appears to be costed too low with row count spool

Bash method for viewing beginning and end of file

What is the intuitive meaning of having a linear relationship between the logs of two variables?

If you attempt to grapple an opponent that you are hidden from, do they roll at disadvantage?

Is there a problem with hiding "forgot password" until it's needed?

Curses work by shouting - How to avoid collateral damage?

Tiptoe or tiphoof? Adjusting words to better fit fantasy races

How does it work when somebody invests in my business?

What will be the benefits of Brexit?

Short story about space worker geeks who zone out by 'listening' to radiation from stars

is this a spam?

Was the picture area of a CRT a parallelogram (instead of a true rectangle)?

Modify casing of marked letters

Is there an Impartial Brexit Deal comparison site?

Ways to speed up user implemented RK4

Greatest common substring

Your magic is very sketchy

What is the oldest known work of fiction?

Efficiently merge handle parallel feature branches in SFDX

What is the term when two people sing in harmony, but they aren't singing the same notes?

Applicability of Single Responsibility Principle

There is only s̶i̶x̶t̶y one place he can be

Why "be dealt cards" rather than "be dealing cards"?

Can criminal fraud exist without damages?

Is expanding the research of a group into machine learning as a PhD student risky?



Suggestion on Missing Index Creation


How does SQL Server determine key column order in missing index requests?SQL Server: index creation dateDynamic temporary index creationParent-Child Tree Hierarchical ORDERAdding index to large mysql tablesFirebird Index Creation FailsMySQL Index Creation Internalsdeteriorating stored procedure running timesClustered Index Creationsp_BlitzIndex finding “Unknown” indexClustered index scan appears to be costed too low with row count spool













1















I have been using sp_blitzindex and it is very very helpful(Thanks to Brent Ozar and Team). I executed this procedure against my database and below is the finding for one table falling in Indexaphobia group:



sp_blitzindex output



below is definition of underlying table:



CREATE TABLE [dbo].[table_name](
[L] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[R] [varchar](15) NOT NULL,
[A] [int] NOT NULL,
[VAR32_01] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_02] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_03] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_04] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_05] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_06] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_07] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_08] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_09] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_10] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_11] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_12] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_13] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_14] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_15] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_16] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_17] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_18] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_19] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_20] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_21] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_22] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_23] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_24] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_25] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_26] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_27] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_28] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_29] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_30] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_31] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_32] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_33] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_34] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_35] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_36] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_37] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_38] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_39] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_40] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_41] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_42] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_43] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_44] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_45] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_46] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_47] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_48] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_49] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_50] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_51] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_52] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_53] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_54] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_55] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_56] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_57] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_58] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_59] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_60] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_61] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_62] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_63] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_64] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR64_01] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_02] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_03] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_04] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_05] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_06] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_07] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_08] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_09] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_10] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_11] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_12] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_13] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_14] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_15] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_16] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_17] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_18] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_19] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_20] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_21] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_22] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_23] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_24] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_25] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_26] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_27] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_28] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_29] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_30] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_31] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_32] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR128_01] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_02] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_03] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_04] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_05] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_06] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_07] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_08] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_09] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_10] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_11] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_12] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_13] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_14] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_15] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_16] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR256_01] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_02] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_03] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_04] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_05] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_06] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_07] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_08] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR512_01] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR512_02] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR512_03] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR512_04] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR1024_01] [varchar](1024) NULL,
[VAR1024_02] [varchar](1024) NULL,
[E] [varchar](20) NULL,
[M] [varchar](40) NULL,
[E] [varchar](50) NULL,
[N] [varchar](40) NULL,
[TN] [int] NULL,
[T] [numeric](1, 0) NULL,
[D] [numeric](1, 0) NULL,
CONSTRAINT [XPKtable_name] PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED
(
[L] ASC,
[R] ASC
)


Following these missing index details, I am planning to create index with below definition:



create nonclustered index table_name_incl(A,VAR32_02) include(L,R,E,T,D,VAR32_10,VAR32_18,VAR32_19,VAR32_20,VAR64_11,VAR64_02,VAR32_42,VAR32_39,VAR32_38,VAR32_35,VAR32_39,VAR32_24,VAR32_25,VAR32_27)


I have arrived at above columns based on the number of occurrences of these columns in all 6 missing index stats.



As you can see from table definition, this is a heap and doesn't have clustered index on this table.



Appreciate your guidance or any assistance on this.



Version: Microsoft SQL Server 2014 (SP3) (KB4022619) - 12.0.6024.0 (X64) Sep 7 2018 01:37:51 Enterprise Edition: Core-based Licensing (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.3 (Build 9600: ) (Hypervisor)









share|improve this question

















  • 1





    Silly question: why not create a clustered index? it looks like if you created one on A, it would solve a few different problems? Is the identity column a nonclustered primary key?

    – Erik Darling
    yesterday











  • @ErikDarling Trying to learn from many experts in the forum. Apologies for silly question.I wish, I could have been in the position to create clustered index. Since, its a vendor supported code, don't have much room for change. Yes, primary key is created as non-clustered column.

    – Learning_DBAdmin
    yesterday











  • I didn't mean your question was silly, I meant mine was. I understand the pain of supporting a vendor database. But to get things right, you can create nonclustered indexes, but not clustered indexes?

    – Erik Darling
    yesterday











  • @ErikDarling Clustered index poses many constraints like null, duplicates etc whereas non-clustered doesn't pose any risk for vendor and they agree on it easily. I have tried many times for clustered index creation however have faced so much resistance from them.I will try once again with them to create clustered index on A column, I would also see if we can have clustered index on L & A; this would be safer for them(I guess).

    – Learning_DBAdmin
    yesterday






  • 1





    No, clustered indexes don't do that. See my demo here.

    – Erik Darling
    yesterday















1















I have been using sp_blitzindex and it is very very helpful(Thanks to Brent Ozar and Team). I executed this procedure against my database and below is the finding for one table falling in Indexaphobia group:



sp_blitzindex output



below is definition of underlying table:



CREATE TABLE [dbo].[table_name](
[L] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[R] [varchar](15) NOT NULL,
[A] [int] NOT NULL,
[VAR32_01] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_02] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_03] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_04] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_05] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_06] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_07] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_08] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_09] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_10] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_11] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_12] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_13] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_14] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_15] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_16] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_17] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_18] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_19] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_20] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_21] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_22] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_23] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_24] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_25] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_26] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_27] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_28] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_29] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_30] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_31] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_32] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_33] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_34] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_35] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_36] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_37] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_38] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_39] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_40] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_41] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_42] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_43] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_44] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_45] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_46] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_47] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_48] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_49] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_50] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_51] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_52] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_53] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_54] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_55] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_56] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_57] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_58] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_59] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_60] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_61] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_62] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_63] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_64] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR64_01] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_02] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_03] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_04] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_05] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_06] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_07] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_08] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_09] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_10] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_11] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_12] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_13] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_14] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_15] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_16] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_17] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_18] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_19] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_20] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_21] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_22] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_23] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_24] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_25] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_26] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_27] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_28] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_29] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_30] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_31] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_32] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR128_01] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_02] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_03] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_04] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_05] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_06] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_07] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_08] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_09] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_10] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_11] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_12] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_13] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_14] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_15] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_16] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR256_01] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_02] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_03] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_04] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_05] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_06] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_07] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_08] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR512_01] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR512_02] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR512_03] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR512_04] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR1024_01] [varchar](1024) NULL,
[VAR1024_02] [varchar](1024) NULL,
[E] [varchar](20) NULL,
[M] [varchar](40) NULL,
[E] [varchar](50) NULL,
[N] [varchar](40) NULL,
[TN] [int] NULL,
[T] [numeric](1, 0) NULL,
[D] [numeric](1, 0) NULL,
CONSTRAINT [XPKtable_name] PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED
(
[L] ASC,
[R] ASC
)


Following these missing index details, I am planning to create index with below definition:



create nonclustered index table_name_incl(A,VAR32_02) include(L,R,E,T,D,VAR32_10,VAR32_18,VAR32_19,VAR32_20,VAR64_11,VAR64_02,VAR32_42,VAR32_39,VAR32_38,VAR32_35,VAR32_39,VAR32_24,VAR32_25,VAR32_27)


I have arrived at above columns based on the number of occurrences of these columns in all 6 missing index stats.



As you can see from table definition, this is a heap and doesn't have clustered index on this table.



Appreciate your guidance or any assistance on this.



Version: Microsoft SQL Server 2014 (SP3) (KB4022619) - 12.0.6024.0 (X64) Sep 7 2018 01:37:51 Enterprise Edition: Core-based Licensing (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.3 (Build 9600: ) (Hypervisor)









share|improve this question

















  • 1





    Silly question: why not create a clustered index? it looks like if you created one on A, it would solve a few different problems? Is the identity column a nonclustered primary key?

    – Erik Darling
    yesterday











  • @ErikDarling Trying to learn from many experts in the forum. Apologies for silly question.I wish, I could have been in the position to create clustered index. Since, its a vendor supported code, don't have much room for change. Yes, primary key is created as non-clustered column.

    – Learning_DBAdmin
    yesterday











  • I didn't mean your question was silly, I meant mine was. I understand the pain of supporting a vendor database. But to get things right, you can create nonclustered indexes, but not clustered indexes?

    – Erik Darling
    yesterday











  • @ErikDarling Clustered index poses many constraints like null, duplicates etc whereas non-clustered doesn't pose any risk for vendor and they agree on it easily. I have tried many times for clustered index creation however have faced so much resistance from them.I will try once again with them to create clustered index on A column, I would also see if we can have clustered index on L & A; this would be safer for them(I guess).

    – Learning_DBAdmin
    yesterday






  • 1





    No, clustered indexes don't do that. See my demo here.

    – Erik Darling
    yesterday













1












1








1








I have been using sp_blitzindex and it is very very helpful(Thanks to Brent Ozar and Team). I executed this procedure against my database and below is the finding for one table falling in Indexaphobia group:



sp_blitzindex output



below is definition of underlying table:



CREATE TABLE [dbo].[table_name](
[L] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[R] [varchar](15) NOT NULL,
[A] [int] NOT NULL,
[VAR32_01] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_02] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_03] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_04] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_05] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_06] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_07] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_08] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_09] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_10] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_11] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_12] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_13] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_14] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_15] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_16] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_17] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_18] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_19] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_20] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_21] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_22] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_23] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_24] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_25] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_26] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_27] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_28] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_29] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_30] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_31] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_32] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_33] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_34] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_35] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_36] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_37] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_38] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_39] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_40] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_41] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_42] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_43] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_44] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_45] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_46] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_47] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_48] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_49] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_50] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_51] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_52] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_53] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_54] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_55] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_56] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_57] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_58] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_59] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_60] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_61] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_62] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_63] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_64] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR64_01] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_02] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_03] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_04] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_05] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_06] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_07] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_08] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_09] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_10] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_11] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_12] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_13] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_14] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_15] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_16] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_17] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_18] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_19] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_20] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_21] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_22] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_23] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_24] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_25] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_26] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_27] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_28] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_29] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_30] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_31] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_32] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR128_01] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_02] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_03] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_04] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_05] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_06] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_07] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_08] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_09] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_10] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_11] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_12] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_13] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_14] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_15] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_16] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR256_01] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_02] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_03] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_04] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_05] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_06] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_07] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_08] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR512_01] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR512_02] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR512_03] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR512_04] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR1024_01] [varchar](1024) NULL,
[VAR1024_02] [varchar](1024) NULL,
[E] [varchar](20) NULL,
[M] [varchar](40) NULL,
[E] [varchar](50) NULL,
[N] [varchar](40) NULL,
[TN] [int] NULL,
[T] [numeric](1, 0) NULL,
[D] [numeric](1, 0) NULL,
CONSTRAINT [XPKtable_name] PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED
(
[L] ASC,
[R] ASC
)


Following these missing index details, I am planning to create index with below definition:



create nonclustered index table_name_incl(A,VAR32_02) include(L,R,E,T,D,VAR32_10,VAR32_18,VAR32_19,VAR32_20,VAR64_11,VAR64_02,VAR32_42,VAR32_39,VAR32_38,VAR32_35,VAR32_39,VAR32_24,VAR32_25,VAR32_27)


I have arrived at above columns based on the number of occurrences of these columns in all 6 missing index stats.



As you can see from table definition, this is a heap and doesn't have clustered index on this table.



Appreciate your guidance or any assistance on this.



Version: Microsoft SQL Server 2014 (SP3) (KB4022619) - 12.0.6024.0 (X64) Sep 7 2018 01:37:51 Enterprise Edition: Core-based Licensing (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.3 (Build 9600: ) (Hypervisor)









share|improve this question














I have been using sp_blitzindex and it is very very helpful(Thanks to Brent Ozar and Team). I executed this procedure against my database and below is the finding for one table falling in Indexaphobia group:



sp_blitzindex output



below is definition of underlying table:



CREATE TABLE [dbo].[table_name](
[L] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[R] [varchar](15) NOT NULL,
[A] [int] NOT NULL,
[VAR32_01] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_02] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_03] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_04] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_05] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_06] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_07] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_08] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_09] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_10] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_11] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_12] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_13] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_14] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_15] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_16] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_17] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_18] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_19] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_20] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_21] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_22] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_23] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_24] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_25] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_26] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_27] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_28] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_29] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_30] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_31] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_32] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_33] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_34] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_35] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_36] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_37] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_38] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_39] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_40] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_41] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_42] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_43] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_44] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_45] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_46] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_47] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_48] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_49] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_50] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_51] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_52] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_53] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_54] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_55] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_56] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_57] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_58] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_59] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_60] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_61] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_62] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_63] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_64] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR64_01] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_02] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_03] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_04] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_05] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_06] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_07] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_08] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_09] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_10] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_11] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_12] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_13] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_14] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_15] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_16] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_17] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_18] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_19] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_20] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_21] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_22] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_23] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_24] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_25] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_26] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_27] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_28] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_29] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_30] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_31] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_32] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR128_01] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_02] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_03] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_04] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_05] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_06] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_07] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_08] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_09] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_10] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_11] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_12] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_13] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_14] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_15] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_16] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR256_01] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_02] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_03] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_04] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_05] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_06] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_07] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_08] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR512_01] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR512_02] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR512_03] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR512_04] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR1024_01] [varchar](1024) NULL,
[VAR1024_02] [varchar](1024) NULL,
[E] [varchar](20) NULL,
[M] [varchar](40) NULL,
[E] [varchar](50) NULL,
[N] [varchar](40) NULL,
[TN] [int] NULL,
[T] [numeric](1, 0) NULL,
[D] [numeric](1, 0) NULL,
CONSTRAINT [XPKtable_name] PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED
(
[L] ASC,
[R] ASC
)


Following these missing index details, I am planning to create index with below definition:



create nonclustered index table_name_incl(A,VAR32_02) include(L,R,E,T,D,VAR32_10,VAR32_18,VAR32_19,VAR32_20,VAR64_11,VAR64_02,VAR32_42,VAR32_39,VAR32_38,VAR32_35,VAR32_39,VAR32_24,VAR32_25,VAR32_27)


I have arrived at above columns based on the number of occurrences of these columns in all 6 missing index stats.



As you can see from table definition, this is a heap and doesn't have clustered index on this table.



Appreciate your guidance or any assistance on this.



Version: Microsoft SQL Server 2014 (SP3) (KB4022619) - 12.0.6024.0 (X64) Sep 7 2018 01:37:51 Enterprise Edition: Core-based Licensing (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.3 (Build 9600: ) (Hypervisor)






sql-server index sp-blitzindex






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked yesterday









Learning_DBAdminLearning_DBAdmin

380114




380114







  • 1





    Silly question: why not create a clustered index? it looks like if you created one on A, it would solve a few different problems? Is the identity column a nonclustered primary key?

    – Erik Darling
    yesterday











  • @ErikDarling Trying to learn from many experts in the forum. Apologies for silly question.I wish, I could have been in the position to create clustered index. Since, its a vendor supported code, don't have much room for change. Yes, primary key is created as non-clustered column.

    – Learning_DBAdmin
    yesterday











  • I didn't mean your question was silly, I meant mine was. I understand the pain of supporting a vendor database. But to get things right, you can create nonclustered indexes, but not clustered indexes?

    – Erik Darling
    yesterday











  • @ErikDarling Clustered index poses many constraints like null, duplicates etc whereas non-clustered doesn't pose any risk for vendor and they agree on it easily. I have tried many times for clustered index creation however have faced so much resistance from them.I will try once again with them to create clustered index on A column, I would also see if we can have clustered index on L & A; this would be safer for them(I guess).

    – Learning_DBAdmin
    yesterday






  • 1





    No, clustered indexes don't do that. See my demo here.

    – Erik Darling
    yesterday












  • 1





    Silly question: why not create a clustered index? it looks like if you created one on A, it would solve a few different problems? Is the identity column a nonclustered primary key?

    – Erik Darling
    yesterday











  • @ErikDarling Trying to learn from many experts in the forum. Apologies for silly question.I wish, I could have been in the position to create clustered index. Since, its a vendor supported code, don't have much room for change. Yes, primary key is created as non-clustered column.

    – Learning_DBAdmin
    yesterday











  • I didn't mean your question was silly, I meant mine was. I understand the pain of supporting a vendor database. But to get things right, you can create nonclustered indexes, but not clustered indexes?

    – Erik Darling
    yesterday











  • @ErikDarling Clustered index poses many constraints like null, duplicates etc whereas non-clustered doesn't pose any risk for vendor and they agree on it easily. I have tried many times for clustered index creation however have faced so much resistance from them.I will try once again with them to create clustered index on A column, I would also see if we can have clustered index on L & A; this would be safer for them(I guess).

    – Learning_DBAdmin
    yesterday






  • 1





    No, clustered indexes don't do that. See my demo here.

    – Erik Darling
    yesterday







1




1





Silly question: why not create a clustered index? it looks like if you created one on A, it would solve a few different problems? Is the identity column a nonclustered primary key?

– Erik Darling
yesterday





Silly question: why not create a clustered index? it looks like if you created one on A, it would solve a few different problems? Is the identity column a nonclustered primary key?

– Erik Darling
yesterday













@ErikDarling Trying to learn from many experts in the forum. Apologies for silly question.I wish, I could have been in the position to create clustered index. Since, its a vendor supported code, don't have much room for change. Yes, primary key is created as non-clustered column.

– Learning_DBAdmin
yesterday





@ErikDarling Trying to learn from many experts in the forum. Apologies for silly question.I wish, I could have been in the position to create clustered index. Since, its a vendor supported code, don't have much room for change. Yes, primary key is created as non-clustered column.

– Learning_DBAdmin
yesterday













I didn't mean your question was silly, I meant mine was. I understand the pain of supporting a vendor database. But to get things right, you can create nonclustered indexes, but not clustered indexes?

– Erik Darling
yesterday





I didn't mean your question was silly, I meant mine was. I understand the pain of supporting a vendor database. But to get things right, you can create nonclustered indexes, but not clustered indexes?

– Erik Darling
yesterday













@ErikDarling Clustered index poses many constraints like null, duplicates etc whereas non-clustered doesn't pose any risk for vendor and they agree on it easily. I have tried many times for clustered index creation however have faced so much resistance from them.I will try once again with them to create clustered index on A column, I would also see if we can have clustered index on L & A; this would be safer for them(I guess).

– Learning_DBAdmin
yesterday





@ErikDarling Clustered index poses many constraints like null, duplicates etc whereas non-clustered doesn't pose any risk for vendor and they agree on it easily. I have tried many times for clustered index creation however have faced so much resistance from them.I will try once again with them to create clustered index on A column, I would also see if we can have clustered index on L & A; this would be safer for them(I guess).

– Learning_DBAdmin
yesterday




1




1





No, clustered indexes don't do that. See my demo here.

– Erik Darling
yesterday





No, clustered indexes don't do that. See my demo here.

– Erik Darling
yesterday










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5














sp_BlitzIndex is just taking SQL Server's recommendations straight from sys.dm_db_missing_index_details, which have a lot of gotchas:



  • They'll recommend indexes similar to indexes that already exist

  • They have minimal concern about the speed of delete/update/insert (DUI) operations, and will recommend so many indexes that your DUIs will slow down

  • They'll recommend indexes that are way too large (too many fields) that your hardware may not be able to support

  • The fields aren't necessarily in the order - the missing index recommendation key order is driven by field order in the table

  • They won't recommend clustered indexes

With all that in mind, sp_BlitzIndex is a tool to be used with training, just like any other tool. You're on the right track by thinking about a clustered index first - I'd start there before adding nonclustered indexes.






share|improve this answer






















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "182"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f233020%2fsuggestion-on-missing-index-creation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5














    sp_BlitzIndex is just taking SQL Server's recommendations straight from sys.dm_db_missing_index_details, which have a lot of gotchas:



    • They'll recommend indexes similar to indexes that already exist

    • They have minimal concern about the speed of delete/update/insert (DUI) operations, and will recommend so many indexes that your DUIs will slow down

    • They'll recommend indexes that are way too large (too many fields) that your hardware may not be able to support

    • The fields aren't necessarily in the order - the missing index recommendation key order is driven by field order in the table

    • They won't recommend clustered indexes

    With all that in mind, sp_BlitzIndex is a tool to be used with training, just like any other tool. You're on the right track by thinking about a clustered index first - I'd start there before adding nonclustered indexes.






    share|improve this answer



























      5














      sp_BlitzIndex is just taking SQL Server's recommendations straight from sys.dm_db_missing_index_details, which have a lot of gotchas:



      • They'll recommend indexes similar to indexes that already exist

      • They have minimal concern about the speed of delete/update/insert (DUI) operations, and will recommend so many indexes that your DUIs will slow down

      • They'll recommend indexes that are way too large (too many fields) that your hardware may not be able to support

      • The fields aren't necessarily in the order - the missing index recommendation key order is driven by field order in the table

      • They won't recommend clustered indexes

      With all that in mind, sp_BlitzIndex is a tool to be used with training, just like any other tool. You're on the right track by thinking about a clustered index first - I'd start there before adding nonclustered indexes.






      share|improve this answer

























        5












        5








        5







        sp_BlitzIndex is just taking SQL Server's recommendations straight from sys.dm_db_missing_index_details, which have a lot of gotchas:



        • They'll recommend indexes similar to indexes that already exist

        • They have minimal concern about the speed of delete/update/insert (DUI) operations, and will recommend so many indexes that your DUIs will slow down

        • They'll recommend indexes that are way too large (too many fields) that your hardware may not be able to support

        • The fields aren't necessarily in the order - the missing index recommendation key order is driven by field order in the table

        • They won't recommend clustered indexes

        With all that in mind, sp_BlitzIndex is a tool to be used with training, just like any other tool. You're on the right track by thinking about a clustered index first - I'd start there before adding nonclustered indexes.






        share|improve this answer













        sp_BlitzIndex is just taking SQL Server's recommendations straight from sys.dm_db_missing_index_details, which have a lot of gotchas:



        • They'll recommend indexes similar to indexes that already exist

        • They have minimal concern about the speed of delete/update/insert (DUI) operations, and will recommend so many indexes that your DUIs will slow down

        • They'll recommend indexes that are way too large (too many fields) that your hardware may not be able to support

        • The fields aren't necessarily in the order - the missing index recommendation key order is driven by field order in the table

        • They won't recommend clustered indexes

        With all that in mind, sp_BlitzIndex is a tool to be used with training, just like any other tool. You're on the right track by thinking about a clustered index first - I'd start there before adding nonclustered indexes.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        Brent OzarBrent Ozar

        35.5k19108241




        35.5k19108241



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f233020%2fsuggestion-on-missing-index-creation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -index, sp-blitzindex, sql-server

            Popular posts from this blog

            Mobil Contents History Mobil brands Former Mobil brands Lukoil transaction Mobil UK Mobil Australia Mobil New Zealand Mobil Greece Mobil in Japan Mobil in Canada Mobil Egypt See also References External links Navigation menuwww.mobil.com"Mobil Corporation"the original"Our Houston campus""Business & Finance: Socony-Vacuum Corp.""Popular Mechanics""Lubrite Technologies""Exxon Mobil campus 'clearly happening'""Toledo Blade - Google News Archive Search""The Lion and the Moose - How 2 Executives Pulled off the Biggest Merger Ever""ExxonMobil Press Release""Lubricants""Archived copy"the original"Mobil 1™ and Mobil Super™ motor oil and synthetic motor oil - Mobil™ Motor Oils""Mobil Delvac""Mobil Industrial website""The State of Competition in Gasoline Marketing: The Effects of Refiner Operations at Retail""Mobil Travel Guide to become Forbes Travel Guide""Hotel Rankings: Forbes Merges with Mobil"the original"Jamieson oil industry history""Mobil news""Caltex pumps for control""Watchdog blocks Caltex bid""Exxon Mobil sells service station network""Mobil Oil New Zealand Limited is New Zealand's oldest oil company, with predecessor companies having first established a presence in the country in 1896""ExxonMobil subsidiaries have a business history in New Zealand stretching back more than 120 years. We are involved in petroleum refining and distribution and the marketing of fuels, lubricants and chemical products""Archived copy"the original"Exxon Mobil to Sell Its Japanese Arm for $3.9 Billion""Gas station merger will end Esso and Mobil's long run in Japan""Esso moves to affiliate itself with PC Optimum, no longer Aeroplan, in loyalty point switch""Mobil brand of gas stations to launch in Canada after deal for 213 Loblaws-owned locations""Mobil Nears Completion of Rebranding 200 Loblaw Gas Stations""Learn about ExxonMobil's operations in Egypt""Petrol and Diesel Service Stations in Egypt - Mobil"Official websiteExxon Mobil corporate websiteMobil Industrial official websiteeeeeeeeDA04275022275790-40000 0001 0860 5061n82045453134887257134887257

            Frič See also Navigation menuinternal link

            Identify plant with long narrow paired leaves and reddish stems Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?What is this plant with long sharp leaves? Is it a weed?What is this 3ft high, stalky plant, with mid sized narrow leaves?What is this young shrub with opposite ovate, crenate leaves and reddish stems?What is this plant with large broad serrated leaves?Identify this upright branching weed with long leaves and reddish stemsPlease help me identify this bulbous plant with long, broad leaves and white flowersWhat is this small annual with narrow gray/green leaves and rust colored daisy-type flowers?What is this chilli plant?Does anyone know what type of chilli plant this is?Help identify this plant